@Jacqueles Twali Although western countries' governments & HRW organizations are pushing her for her acknowledgement & announcement for Myanmar military brutal crackdown in Rakhine state, the fact that she did not voice any blaming words towards Myanmar military's action in Rakhine state although she doesn't like nor approve the way Myanmar military handled is that she is infect trying to push for very difficult obhective of stopping the decades-long civil war with many ethnic groups and to push for nation-wide peace process which is vital for the country's future. But much of the world doesn't know that she and elected government president has no authority to command Myanmar military which is specifically granted special permission and separate power organization under 2008 Constitution. In order for her to stop the suffering of people from civil wars through out the country, she has no choice but to negotiate with the military leader which is standing as separate power organization apart from president & parliment to stop fighting with ethnic armed groups. If she somehow blame separate entity military organization, the country reconciloation & peace process will more hinder which is currently at road blocked with many of the ethnic states strongly distrust the military which is not under the control of central quasi-democracy government. Therefore, instead of blaming & pointing fingers as western countries' desire, she has chosen to sacrifice her name, fame & herself for her country's peaceful future by trying to reconcile the armed conflict between the country's out-of-contol military organization and ethnic groups, and to heed for her words for peace process. The actual facts that most of the people do not know: 1. Although Myanmar is transitioned to democracy, the 2008 constitution was specially prepared by previous military dictator regime which allows military to stand as separate organization not to be commanded by country president. Only the senior general can control and command the military. 2. Military general will directly appoint 25% of the seats in all parliments of Myanmar (both central and all states/regional parliments); not by people vote. 3. If elected government wants to change the law, mostly it needs >75% of vote in parliment so basically the elected government cannot change the laws or do anything without military approval. 4. The 2008 Constitution allows military General not only control the military itself but also all the armed forces of Myanmar; therefore the country's police force is under the direct authority of the Military; not by the president.
As someone who lived in Myanmar, this video misses a few key points about the state of Burmese politics and the 2008 constitution. While the military is guaranteed 25% of seats in parliament by the constitution, it also retained control of the ministries of home affairs, defense, and border affairs. This means they control both the police and the military. Aung San Suu Kyi has little to no influence over those forces. The state of Rakhine is also one of the few in Myanmar that is not controlled by Aung San Suu Kyi’s party so she holds no influence over political or military matters in that state. It is easy to say that she is in the wrong, but in reality, what can she really do? Yes, she could (and probably should) speak out about the atrocities in Rakhine when she is abroad, but there is almost nothing she can do domestically. I am not saying she is innocent but the world has glossed over the current complexities of Myanmar’s government to find her as the face of the genocide.
I think ur not watched the video , It said she is promoting non- violence government but in the end why is this happened as a leader should is not the right word but ITS Have to Shes have to speak about that
say this prsn is 👎 and still got nobel.. I obviously should be leading against stray strain say skip don't do that y jail ur own heroes being too good(?) s leong that horrible what the hel is the coup about so unnecessary deaths
Same. I only happened to see the detainment news story of her on Al Jezeera, flicking through the Channels.. Painting her a 'hero of the people', and "baseless" and no evidence of election fraud. Since AJ is Cultural Marxist with a pro Globalist UN agenda anyways, I'm digging for the truth about this Woman, and how todays events came to be. Don't trust the msm narrative.
Continuing the disappointing trend of Nobel peace prize winner, perhaps the Nobel community should consider nominating Thanos for his work in peace to the universe
@chemicalhorror A)They have a history of taking actions against religions that aren't their own especially Muslims. B) They are one of Burma's top trade partners
I believe the people of Myanmar voted for her because she was the only person who stood against the military regime. The people chose her because they wanted freedom. She only fought for her people and I don’t think it’s fair to blame her for doing so. The entire problem is so complicated. The people of Myanmar are still in the grasp of the military regime till this day. It’s only a matter of time till they retake control and commit more atrocities.
a comment from Thailand : It's easy to put all the blame on her, without taking note that she can't control even one conscript in the army. Why don't you help her to get full democracy first.
But he could have denounced them instead of protecting the military and if you say that he will get fired for critisizing the government than he should go with it if he truly belive and uphold his principale rather than ignoring the atrocities that is happening in his country just so he could keep his position as president albeit a ceremonial president who didnt have the power to control the military
Well in that case if she’s so innocent why doesn’t she resign ? She clearly supports the politics and actions of the politics, she’s clearly not what she was portrayed to be that’s why some in denial people will continue wagging their tails behind this murderer and try justify her actions, that are outright inhumane and oppressive.
This kind of video is precisely why I tend to avoid western (especially american) sources on international matters. As many have pointed out in the comments, she never really had too much power to begin with. Myanmar was more of an experimental democracy rather than a real functioning democratic state. Military still controls at least 25% of the seats (as part of a constitutional law) and have entire control over several factions of the government, including internal security. The video falls on its face when dealing with the complexity of the issue. As usual, everything is analyzed and understood through the highly biased lens of american ideology and it just ends up vomiting a useless speech that doesn't really gets us any closer to understanding the situation.
I've been Burma myself. A beautiful place with an interesting culture and beautiful people. The story of Suu Kyi is perceived differently from the people of Burma to Western Social Media. This guy like many can't get enough info about the stem issues of Burma. I was lucky to meet a local who was brave enough to talk to me about the politics. Don't believe everything you hear. Research and open your perspective.
The perfect example of: "You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become a villain." I remember a girl cosplayed her during a peace rally in my school.
@@jonnathan7908 Yea, She just changed her hairdo, wore that colourful dress... While, I was made Dalai Lama and shaved my hair off. Some people get off easy...
I still remember how western politician praise her and west media gave her compliment, but I think we can say this, maybe just for developing country, if your leader pleased everyone in west, that s means he or she did what west want, not their own people want.
I do not think that is necessarily true... I think she has been very compliant with what the majority of Burmans want, that is to say, the expulsion of Rohingya. The issue is not that she is disobeying the will of Burmans; it is that the will of Burmans is genocidal.
So what you are saying is that she is not a villian, but the people of Myanmar are murdering bigots and she enables them in order to hold onto power. How very very sad.
@Rouli Kumari listen u first!!!! firstly, not all the forces are controlled by DASSK, secondly,, things are not as easy as u may well think stupid!! politics is complicated!!
@rollykumari 25% in parliament is military. It was never the winning party i.e sukyi's party doing . The constitution was written by millitary government. The winning party has been trying to change it for years but military is stopping it. Military would meddle with politics getting attention elsewhere and doing things. It is indeed complicated to say the least.
Imagine your family were denounced from their civilian rights and then burnt alive, raped and banished into the rivers, would you have the same love for her as a government. Please don’t forget humanity and the livelihood of others. Remover whatever you do to people comes back to you.
well nobody cares about 'your people's' heart only. your people are not the only people there. when looking at the overall rohingya issue and the number of civillians who were murdered, and her inaction, its clear that she's still an utter disgusting failure
I think the way to democracy and peace among the different ethnical groups is still a struggle. We, as Westerners, have long forgotten how difficult it was and how many compromises should be made to protect an infant and still fragile democracy. I think time will tell what she truly is. I wish for the best.
What she truly is, is that she's a powerless leader. She's just a symbol, an idol of Myanmar democracy. This is why she complied to the Junta narratives, becoming their mouthpiece to spread lies about the genocide of Rohingnya. Which the consequence still feel today across nations with the mounting problems of refugees and the desperate actions to fulfill their needs. Now she's just an obscure old woman that the world shun and forget about.
“…. Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson explains what is really happening in Burma/Myanmar and why it is relevant to us. On February 1, the Burmese military took over the country, nullifying the results of a fraudulent election from November which had installed liberal, color revolutionary, media darling Aung San Suu Kyi. From a westernized, very wealthy family, Kyi was educated in the west and serves the CIA and the Soros-banker fronts explicitly. In the aftermath of the November 8 elections, the color revolutionaries allegedly won 396 out of 476 seats in parliament, cutting the military-based parties from political relevance. The military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) insists that the CIA and its local agents rigged the elections, citing 10.5 million cases of irregularities. These have led to mass protests in all major states and cities of the country. The purpose of this fraudulent election is to enshrine liberalism over the political life of the country, which is a way to pull Burma out of its pro-China policy. More broadly, the point is to break the development of the New Silk Road project, a multi-trillion dollar, anti-liberal infrastructure project unifying the Eurasian plain against the west. If liberalism has the IMF, the WTO and Davos as its institutional representatives, the anti-liberal movement has the New Silk Road. The coup against liberalism in Burma has immense geopolitical consequences few realize…..”
The problem with the reporting of Suu Kyi is that people assume that the NLD has the power to do what it wants. They cannot. The military would overthrow them at a seconds notice if given the opportunity. The country’s security forces are therefore free to conduct a campaign to deliberately undermine her on the world stage by imprisoning journalists and conducting a major genocide - or at least allowing paramilitary groups to. I’m not sure if - given she has no real power to stop it - it is worth praising her for bringing democracy to Myanmar and I’m certainly not sure that remaining silent and not taking a stand and bidding her time is the right decision, but I do believe that she has been badly misunderstood and the calls to strip her of her Noble Peace Prize are misguided and will give the military what it wants, her government damage.
@@sakuradeva555 both sides have hurt and i guess that's right to say " fear on both sides" and besides , some media are overacting on this thing from the side of rohingyas. in my opinion, only real and true and fair news and opinions should be liberated.
@@sakuradeva555 first, this whole thing ( as u say, genocide) is not just done by the military but also AA is involving. So if someone wants to complain this, they should be aware that this case is responsible not just to the myanmar military. Second, myanmar military is not under the control of DASSK and all those shootings and battles are not ordered by DASSK . so in brief, military literally doesn't obey the officially elected authority of myanmar in which DASSK is leading. plus, i don't really know who's behind these tragic murders but let me tell you something, this thing is not done by DASSK, nor ordered by her and the whole planned things (idk) are done without her knowledge. and media are sharing the unsure news about this thing, maximizing the problems and making the people all over the world to misunderstand all the situations including you. i haven't been to the war zone , neither you and all of us, and there could be many possibilities between these and plus, even these news are real or whatever,, what else can we do except sittin g on the chair , keep up to date the news and kindly wish the victims the best. please don't judge so fast. ps. rohingyas ( the term u used ) is actually fake. there aren't no rohingyas and the whole made up story of those people. there were some indians or bangaladesh living there hundreds of years but they aren't rohingyas at all. the ancestors of indians or bangaladesh living there were brought to here to work in the early industrialization in the industries. ( factual record!! thanks me later) the population of those people wasn't that great that time. so the growth of those people must be due to the rapid child births and plus, across the border, huge amount of people from bangaladesh illegally came into myanmar many times and see? now they are asking for their own land. that's what happen when we just ignored for years, their population is unbelievable now.
@@sakuradeva555 I surely believe now you know mass support mean nothing compare to power of guns. But get your facts straight before you put sensitive topics on table.
@@sakuradeva555 As for the inaccurate reporting, You should really check Human Rights Watch (HRW),International Crisis Group . Reliable report boldly report against propaganda. I not saying military did not committed ferocious responses. They even killing their own people for power. I just want you to know to point at right direction.
As a southeast asian, I am regretful of the current situation in Myanmar in contrast to the development in other southeast asian countries. This just perfectly shows how political unrest can hamper the progress of a country.
I'm a Burmese and after seeing this documentary, I feel very disappointed to be point out to our leader. We have been under our own government for over 50 years by so called "Military". And many people died and sacrifices for their life to get freedom for Aung San Su Kyi who is a daughter of General Aung San. She brings peace and democracy which we didn't have since President U Thein Sain (Military). Falls for her would be the trash she have to face that the last government had left. She have to clean those trash while other military based party people want to rebel against her to get military back. So I don't want any of those cold war within our country and being tortured by military so called "Union Solidarity and Development Party" for a long year since my grandparent's parent. The generation from Union Solidarity and Development Party people are not willing to win Aung San Su Kyi 'cause they are afraid that their freedom and trade will stop and their money income will close. So I don't want people from the world to see Daw Aung San Su Kyi as a bad leader, instead she is fixing the country fault by those people from Union Solidarity and Development Party. Thank you.
Then i think the whole population have a problem in their mindset. Whatever you say you cant defend myanmar for the killing of Rohingya. She is expressing her true self now, or someone evil doing it from behind. But it is evil work. Not only the west we the neighbour bangladeshis think the same.
@@TracyDomenica wow 2 million people? Living there for 400 years Spies? Or a country which is in neutrality with Myanmar Either your ISLAMOPHOBIC, xenophobic, racist , dumb or not well educated about this exact matter
@Arun s well... The civil war in chattagram ended in 1980s and yes violence between the chakma and Bangladeshi government forces break down once in a while But it's not a *Genocide* like Myanmar
its really sad that one low IQ video can have so much influence and that most people will not go on to do further research. Those who posted this video either is not aware of the harm it has caused or doesn't care because it's making profit from it. Heartbreaking.
As mentioned in this video multiple times, she was given unimaginable choices throughout her political career, and the Rohingya crisis was one of them. She never held the power to command the military, but she took the blame because she was the leader of the government at the time on paper. And as always, she made the difficult decision to not go up against the military generals which would have resulted in another coup. She chose to keep one hand on the wheel to steer instead of letting go of both hands. If you think this is some bs, just look at what happened on Feb 1st, 2021. Another military coup the day before the parliament was due to swear in the NLD members who won the 2020 election by a landslide. The generals are still in complete control of the military. But fortunately for burmese people, everything she sacrificed and faced, which would break a normal person hundred times over, are for the country and its people, not for a prize. One thing to be clear, in the hearts of burmese people across the world, there will never, NEVER be “the fall of Aung San Suu Kyi”. Because she is a mother to us.
“…. Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson explains what is really happening in Burma/Myanmar and why it is relevant to us. On February 1, the Burmese military took over the country, nullifying the results of a fraudulent election from November which had installed liberal, color revolutionary, media darling Aung San Suu Kyi. From a westernized, very wealthy family, Kyi was educated in the west and serves the CIA and the Soros-banker fronts explicitly. In the aftermath of the November 8 elections, the color revolutionaries allegedly won 396 out of 476 seats in parliament, cutting the military-based parties from political relevance. The military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) insists that the CIA and its local agents rigged the elections, citing 10.5 million cases of irregularities. These have led to mass protests in all major states and cities of the country. The purpose of this fraudulent election is to enshrine liberalism over the political life of the country, which is a way to pull Burma out of its pro-China policy. More broadly, the point is to break the development of the New Silk Road project, a multi-trillion dollar, anti-liberal infrastructure project unifying the Eurasian plain against the west. If liberalism has the IMF, the WTO and Davos as its institutional representatives, the anti-liberal movement has the New Silk Road. The coup against liberalism in Burma has immense geopolitical consequences few realize…..”
She is the daughter of someone who could be termed as 'father of the nation', military hero if you will. She was also supported by the vast majority of the people. Her army was every single member of the country. If anything had happened to her civil war would have been inevitable. So the army than gave her a filmsy position and she accepted, even knowing that she wouldn't have any real power. Which I believe was pretty cowardly.
How can you call her cowardly when she took on so much to improve the lives of the Burmese people and spent a good part of her life in prison for the cause of a free Burma?
She is trying to reconcile the elected government and the army . The military took advantage of that doing what they want.Everybody blame this for Suu Kyi.
"you die early to see yourself a hero or Live long enough to see yourself a villain" So this got me thinking like this: She got into power and understood the geopolitical situation of her country and what it actually takes to keep her country together. After she understood this she was still willing to do good by her country even if it meant sullying her own good name in the world and becoming the villain responsible for thousands or even tens of thousands of deaths. In a twisted turn of black irony she has finally proven herself to be a true patriot.
The conclusion of this essay is really off. You can never compare how western philosophy to the philosophy of Myanmar. It's their country and I believe people there are strong enough to do what is best for their own country.
Aung San Suu Kyi is doing what she can with the limited scope that she has and a bunch of imbeciles here talking about her fall. Do you have any idea about the situation was in and still now?
From a personal standpoint, I can understand why she has become the leader she is. It took her over two decades to win her fight to end military rule in Myanmar, and now that she's in power to rule the country, she doesn't want to do anything that risks her being disposed. This is not a justification for what she's allowed since coming to power of course; just an explanation for why she may be governing the way she is.
We support the Burmese people against tyranny, but we don't forget the Rohingyas, all people being equal, deserving life free from harm and peril. It is a pity that Aung San Suu Kyi ruined her reputation and image before the world community.
@@sawlawehwahwahpoehtoo4624 i just want to laugh to your comment. I was born and live in kayin state and all of my karen friends love her so much than me.
it takes time. She knows feel good words wont solve a broken country. Has the Dalai lama freed Tibet no. Has Hilary become president. No. Unlike Nelson Mandela, Myanmar is not a black and white issue. She has said nothing negative about the rohingyas. In fact, constant repatriation efforts are being made. Just because shes not speaking loudly does not mean she is not doing something. What about new zealand that agreed to assist myanmar in repatriation efforts. fifty muslim folks are shot by a white folk in a country where cohabitation of two cultures are politically forced but minds are not changed. Where in the non muslim world are muslims safe. Do muslim countries also willingly house the Rohingya muslim brothers. Furthermore, this is a race issue, not a religious issue. Muslims of every other ethnicity and Buddhist majority in Myanmar coexist in the imperfect, impoverished, dictator ruled world that is Myanmar for over sixty years. It is only with the Rohingya rebels who attacked rohingya hindus and villages, massacring hundreds. Look at amnesty international. Since the time of the world wars, they fought with the enemy to get land from Myanmar to join with bangladesh, and in the end were hated for it and made stateless by the army that found them a threat. Instead of assimilating into Myanmar, rebels still largely exist, always attacking the resting monster that is the Myanmar army. Mind you the myanmar army does not care for the country and will eliminate anything in its way to attack Aung San Suu Kyi. And they just became the target. Even then, Suu Kyi is trying what she can do. Rohingyas can come back, the identification process is still long and tedious. And yet there are rohingya rebels lurking among the innocent refugees, refusing to go back demanding land from Rakhine region, land that historically belonged to the rakhine folks since ancient times, its not even Burmese historical land. Imagine the chaos the country would be in if Suu Kyi became a yes man to the international world and not see the traps laid out for her
Allah gives rope to the opressors for a while... So that they will increase in their blindness... Then he will pull the rope in and all will be judged... And the punishment of the oppressors will begin... And it won't end... EVER
She never fall (definitely for us). Ask everyone in Myanmar. Most says she is still the best. We just had municipal elections for Yangon and her party backed candidates won. We want a leader who will build our future, not a puppet who always listens to the west. Stop mentioning one sided story and stop bullying us via big media.
exactly!! im from myanmar too and i completely agree that she is the best leader who's trying her best during these hard struggles! and media is too overacting on the side from the refugees.
She's still alive, that's what matters. Look at her father, assassinated at 32. Then look at the military dictator, lived till 92 and probably died of natural causes. I'm sure she's bidding her time for the greater good. Hellota good she would be for her country if she's 6 feet under. She's not perfect but I genuinely believe that SHE WILL PREVAIL.
@Salterino Kripperino That does not Justified all of the stupid things they did. you know that all nation in south east asia were colonized at one time right. Do they committing genocide to the descendants of the people that colonized them ? NO. because the war is OVER. Myanmar is being ruled by Fear and propaganda. They need an enemy so they can have public support
@AcidicPlant Studios well i agree with you that calling it propaganda maybe an exaggeration and no i dont think she did this. Its more likely that the military faction just join the hatred and use it to gain more support since rohingya can be seen as "invader" and military as the "savior"
What if the military is forcing her to do what shes doing, and if she doesn't they will cause mass devastation no one like her can just change like that
2 D'Auteuil Yes! That is exactly the case, all these westerners in the comment section are just focusing their sights on the "atrocities" That Aung San Su Kyi committed, we Burmese people know this fact. Aung San Su Kyi still does not have enough power to create a long lasting change however she is fighting and still very much fighting for it. It's so painful to see our national hero considered a mass murderer and power hungry politician
Recently found out I am a little bit of Rohingya. Even though she is not handling the Rohingya situation well, I still believe she is a good human being. "A bad thing cannot make a good person bad" - The Power Rangers Movie
She still has the option to denounce the inhumane genocide or even show some kind of empathy you’d expect a human to show, but she has shown nothing but hostility ?! Imagine you and your loved ones, were denounced from their civilian rights and then burnt alive, raped and banished would you have the same acceptance of her as a ‘powerless government’ ? If you have any love for humanity you wouldn’t say what you have said.
Aung San Sukyi is a Burmese first of all. She was fighting for Burmese freedom, not for the foreigners in Burma. Foreigners may not adore her anymore, but she is still her father's daughter, and all Burmese understand and respect that.
The first thing that comes to my mind after watching this film is "Why do I expect others to be all perfect and saintly when I am definitely not". I am just a human being babe.
From a cosmic perspective.. This lady literally fought an army without an army of her own.. I understand she has the populis on her side, but how can an entire army be kept at Bay by a single woman
I think you haven't taken into account all the factors here. She is the daughter of someone who could be termed as 'father of the nation', military hero if you will. She was also supported by the vast majority of the people. Her army was every single member of the country. If anything had happened to her civil war would have been inevitable. So the army than gave her a filmsy position and she accepted, even knowing that she wouldn't have any real power. Which I believe was pretty cowardly.
Myanmar deserves to define its own destiny not according to the west's definition. It all started from the west dethroning the country's royal ruler which dimmed the vision of the people's national identity. Myanmar has its own way of finding itself. So let it be. One with your struggles in prayer Myanmar.
Do you know about Myanmar politics????? I am sure you don't know clearly. Because you only see cover of myanmar . But most of politicial and mass are know how her standing.
if she had made some mining contracts with western companies she would have been regarded in far higher regards. This is very much frustrating western freedom capitalists.
I have no respect for the Noble Peace Prize and ALL of its winners. The nomination and selection of the winners are very arbitrary. So often they are awarded to the so-called "Human Rights" fighters. In reality, the world peace has almost nothing to do with the "Human Rights".
it's not just that she didn't have control over the military but the military already took 25% of unelected spots in the parliament and you need 75% votes to change anything on the 2008 Constitution written by the military government. You also have the USDP party (ex-military) in the parliament and the nonelected 25% plus them always refuse to change anything in Constitution that will lessen the power and control they have over the country
She never fall .We Myanmar people love her.Your western master can retake all the prize which was given to her but they can never claim the love of myanmar 🇲🇲 people on her.
She has been under house arrest for a majority of her life to fight for democracy for the people of Burma to have equal rights. She does not appear to me as power hungry politician nor a person behind the genocide, it’s the military regime that control this power and killing innocent ppl as they always had. She took no place in harming other human beings in her mother country.
The British government invaded and occupied Bangladesh and Myanmar. They created this situation, and now they want to transfer blame to this 78 year old woman who sits in a Myanmar prison. This is her reward for her loyalty to western intel agencies.
Was this an additional prize to the frogman they sent to her house in 2009? I have a hard time imagining her working for foreign powers than it is to believe they're the very ones keeping her out to ensure the countries opium productions maintained.
I'm from Burma you can ask me any questions regarding this issue. You deserve to know what is actually happening here and not what the western media portrays
Hi, I'm doing some research for my world politics class. I'm curious, how do the people of Burma see the violence and claimed ethnic cleansing against the Rohingya? Do you guys agree with the governments handling of them, or do you think it is bad? What are your general thoughts on the Rohingya?
Imagine you and your loved ones, were denounced from their civilian rights and then burnt alive, raped and banished would you have the same acceptance of her as a ‘powerless government’ ? If you have any love for humanity you wouldn’t spread ignorance.
@@yayeetyoyae362 The people here including myself sees the violence committed in the rakhine state as horrible. The goverment's plan to solve the crisis has backfired with us getting a terrible reputation in the west. However, the goverment here still contains remnants of the military junta with them having 25 percent of the parliamentary seats by default so the new elected democratic government is still quite limited in their choices. Our globalized generation mainly consisting of millenials and gen z acknowledge the horrible atrocities committed from both sides by our government attempting to control the crisis resulting several casualities considered to be ethnic cleansing and extermist rohingyas groups such as ARSA wreaking havoc on our soil.
@@NotAleenaAlt2 I understand where you are coming from and I respect that. We are not spreading ignorance either. But I would like you to listen to both sides of the story because this problem is incredibly complicated since it started during Birtish occupation in Myanmar. Many of our homes has been burnt down to the ground and our police stations attacked by their extremist groups too. No one is the innocent victim in this conflict when both sides commit horrible atrocities. We just gained our democractic rights just 4years ago and change will take a very long time for things to go right. Not to mention the remainings of the military junta that ruled burma with an iron fist since 1960 still has 25 percent of the power by default and the votes given to the party isnt even included yet. We are not just accpecting the democractic government as powerless either. New attempts have been made to abolish the 25 percent seats law that keeps giving the military rights to commit whatever atrocities they commit in rakhine state. The rohingyas were never denounced civilian rights because there was never one in the first place and we are all trying to grant them to get recognised as an official ethnic group of Myanmar.
That's why people of myanmar treat her like their own mother. Out side world know as The Lady. Inside myanmar know as The Mother. They always proud of call her mother.... She is the One..... The only one..
Norway and Sweden both pushed the prizes for propaganda purposes that has blown up in their faces time and time again. Worse was 1968 when Sweden's central bank "donated" a "large sum" of money to hand out prizes in economics to celebrate their 300th anniversary. A. Nobel specifically wrote that he did not want to give prizes in economics because it is too akin to philosophy with very little objectivity and predictive capacity therefore can be used to demagoguery/propaganda toward a person not the science or philosophy discovered. Nobel left out mathematics, it would have made sense to add that one. But nope. Economics instead. I wonder why?
she was awarded it for her earlier works, why take that away from her? She's done more for the people of Myanmar than you or any of the millions of people in the world ever could.
No one ever thought that maybe the military wanted to destroy the public and international image of Suu Kyi, and thus making her no longer a threat for them?
she could have resigned the power and told her party to give up the power that they are holding. But No, it is about numbers (majority is Buddhist, that will help her win again).
@@musadiqnoor1 that would just make her look more like the good person that was forced by the "baddies" to resign power. By not letting her resign power and making her as a forced puppet, they would make her look like the evil woman that ordered the genocide and that the military is innocent and was just following orders.
I don't understand do you support her actions today or not. My point is when one knows that nothing is in one's hands then why stay in power (unless one is comfortable with the genocide).
@@musadiqnoor1 Well maybe because she can't. As i explained in my previous comment, if she does that, she would just be seen as the good guy. By resigning, as you said, would signify that she didn't really want this to happen and that maybe she was forced to take it all in.
While it is true that Aung San Suu Kyi doesn’t have much control over military, that does not excuse her from defending their genocide of the Rohingya Muslims. It also does not excuse her for cracking down on free speech and jailing journalists. This video also failed to mention how she has made virtually no progress regarding democracy since she’s taken power, and that she is defending the very military that had held her hostage. The Burmese government has remained as repressive as it was before she took power, and she has made no attempt at changing it. Her party holds legislative power yet they have changed very little in this country. I believe Suu Kyi has become obsessed with holding power.
@@eya3477 come to my country before you judge from the media. Some came and they know the truth what is really happening out here. Should a parents protect their own kids from stranger who abuse them? that's what she did. I'm just telling there is a story which media portrait only small portion of it.
The commentators in the comment section acts like they know enough to judge her. If you're a citizen of them I will give you a pass but even still, leaders has several informations at her that even their citizens doesn't know and to act having those informations is a careful decisive choice as a leader and not based on emotions.
I don’t know but it seems that this video is very one sided on the Rohingya case. I’ve seen better videos explaining Rohingya on both sides and understood the situation better.
@@rumblefish9 Rotten Apple just cause they have the same religion doesn't make them there people , they are from myanmar it's their country too you have no right to try to kick them out just cause they are minority
She is hero and never fall ... Love her from India🇮🇳. Satan forgot that they killed 100 million hindu in medieval period . Myanmar🇲🇲 and china incident is their karma.
@@thanglaka9543 protecting her country and people from islam is not being a puppet and she is sacrificing her own reputation and interest for it.. the european leaders who made their countries islamic sh*tholes full of no go zones , those are real puppets
@@aunlii7843 sorry? Even killing baby? Your reason so reasonable. Everyone all over the world what Myanmar doing to Rohingya. Killing thousands of people. We call them buddhist-terrorists. Because the terrorists who killed Rohingya ethnic are buddhist. I dont know are they armies or not. But for sure they are the terrorists.
Gandhi has bigger balls than her. She is nothing compared to that legend. India’s freedom struggle was much more bloodier than myanmar can ever cook up. The more i grew up, the more I appreciated Gandhi.
Aung San Suu Kui "rose" because she loved her country and the way she pursuit Myanmar's national interest met the taste of the West. Aung San Suu Jui "felt" because she loved her country and the way she pursuit Myanmar's national interest was against the taste of the West. As far as I am concerned, she has remained the same all the time. And who are the people from the West to determine whether she was right or wrong? The Muslim minority in Rohingya was made up of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh and they were talking about carving the Rakhine State of Burma to build their own country. If the West is so benevolent, why don't they just take in the Muslim minority to their own countries and let them build their own nation there? Hypocrisy.
thumbs up to your comment!! illegal immigrants from bangaladesh is messing this up since they want the SPACE, WHICH IS CALLED THEIR OWN COUNTRY BY THE OVERLY RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND DASSK IS STUCKING BETWEEEN THESE THINGS WHICH EVEN MADE HER CALLED ''''POWER HUNGRY POLITICIAN''' . so sick of those people who only know to judge and blame on their non-business things
It si not about “freedom fighter” or “heroine “ in the eyes of the west . Ridiculous, political morality as seen in the west is a way of governing people . Who or what give them the right to judge all other cultures under same standards . She is doing what needs to be done in Myanmar for the yes and for the culture of those people . You people in the west can not understand, because you people are not Burmese.
Aung San Suu Kyi literally proved the adage "...think globally.. act locally...". I think her conscious stand on rohinga issue was in the long-term interest of Myanmar. Future will show that her critical decision in fact justified the spirit of Nobel peace prize. The potential of perpetual violence in Myanmar will be less than it would have been. She proved herself a patriot who sacrificed her personal interests in favor of her country.
In 2005, I went to Burma on two week holiday. During sightseeing tour of Rangoon, I told my guide to show me the house of The Lady who was under house arrest. The guide turned pale, looked terrified and didn't take me near her house.
You are just an arrogant freak who knows nothing regarding the incident. Yet you Have the audacity to comment. See her interviews you moron. According to her Rohingya's are to blame for their condition.
All those defending her - have you not heard her PUBLIC statements which amount to hate speech against the Rohingya population? She knows her words have an impact and that’s how she chooses to use said impact. It’s not about whether the Junta still holds real power - of course it does. It’s about a ‘non violence icon’ contributing immensely to a genocidal climate.
Myanmar is an underdeveloped country and there are many problems in different sectors; in politics, economics, education, health etc. As a leader of such a poor country, which is trying to stand on the road of democracy, she needs to think in different perspectives/angles- not just one side so that our country doesn't fall back to rule of the old government. We, the majority of Myanmar citizens who want Democracy, believe in her. We have faith in her. Please judge when you do know her situation. Please ask yourself how much you know about Myanmar before you judge? ( P.S We respect your concern about our country and care for Rohingya in Rakhine, thanks.)
It is funny that this does not speak how the military in still in charge of the country. And that Suu Kyi power is actually not that strong if indeed you want to criticize her be honest about the realities on ground. Yes she should be stronger in her criticism of the military but painting the situation on ground as a simply she is the reason why is happening is happening is just silly.please stop making simple narratives about important issues
We used to live across from her when I was a kid. There was a lake and our house was on the opposite side. There was so many silent protests that turned violent from the government with massive deaths of the people
Why do Burmese people hate and oppress the Rohingya? What did this powerless minority to the Burmese majority? She also supported the genocide. Do you have an answer to that question? Because I would like to hear your point of view.
Google recommends this and I'm watching video that have been uploaded a year ago. This is a good insight of what happened in the last 2 weeks in myanmar. Thanks for recommendations.
![Gunna - HIM ALL ALONG [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HiCxoDeo0hc/mqdefault.jpg)
It's funny. Her rise happened under captivity. And her fall when she became free
pratik dutta "With great power comes great responsibility. "
When she was captive her brain worked like Aristotle, when she was free she became Kardashian.
She may have fell from world grace but still be supported by her constituents. Unless the world is going to embargo myanmar, she doesn't care.
Brainwashed
Nice poetry
She may be the prime minister/ president, but the army isn't effectively under her command.
I imagine so. The military dominated her life, and the parliament. Maybe the only thing that's changed is the appearance.
Shu Meister facts
That’s right. People think she the head of Burma like wtf.
That's so true.
@Jacqueles Twali
Although western countries' governments & HRW organizations are pushing her for her acknowledgement & announcement for Myanmar military brutal crackdown in Rakhine state, the fact that she did not voice any blaming words towards Myanmar military's action in Rakhine state although she doesn't like nor approve the way Myanmar military handled is that she is infect trying to push for very difficult obhective of stopping the decades-long civil war with many ethnic groups and to push for nation-wide peace process which is vital for the country's future. But much of the world doesn't know that she and elected government president has no authority to command Myanmar military which is specifically granted special permission and separate power organization under 2008 Constitution. In order for her to stop the suffering of people from civil wars through out the country, she has no choice but to negotiate with the military leader which is standing as separate power organization apart from president & parliment to stop fighting with ethnic armed groups. If she somehow blame separate entity military organization, the country reconciloation & peace process will more hinder which is currently at road blocked with many of the ethnic states strongly distrust the military which is not under the control of central quasi-democracy government.
Therefore, instead of blaming & pointing fingers as western countries' desire, she has chosen to sacrifice her name, fame & herself for her country's peaceful future by trying to reconcile the armed conflict between the country's out-of-contol military organization and ethnic groups, and to heed for her words for peace process.
The actual facts that most of the people do not know:
1. Although Myanmar is transitioned to democracy, the 2008 constitution was specially prepared by previous military dictator regime which allows military to stand as separate organization not to be commanded by country president. Only the senior general can control and command the military.
2. Military general will directly appoint 25% of the seats in all parliments of Myanmar (both central and all states/regional parliments); not by people vote.
3. If elected government wants to change the law, mostly it needs >75% of vote in parliment so basically the elected government cannot change the laws or do anything without military approval.
4. The 2008 Constitution allows military General not only control the military itself but also all the armed forces of Myanmar; therefore the country's police force is under the direct authority of the Military; not by the president.
As someone who lived in Myanmar, this video misses a few key points about the state of Burmese politics and the 2008 constitution. While the military is guaranteed 25% of seats in parliament by the constitution, it also retained control of the ministries of home affairs, defense, and border affairs. This means they control both the police and the military. Aung San Suu Kyi has little to no influence over those forces. The state of Rakhine is also one of the few in Myanmar that is not controlled by Aung San Suu Kyi’s party so she holds no influence over political or military matters in that state.
It is easy to say that she is in the wrong, but in reality, what can she really do? Yes, she could (and probably should) speak out about the atrocities in Rakhine when she is abroad, but there is almost nothing she can do domestically. I am not saying she is innocent but the world has glossed over the current complexities of Myanmar’s government to find her as the face of the genocide.
So she's useless
No she isn't
Well, she supported the genocide!
I think ur not watched the video ,
It said she is promoting non- violence government but in the end why is this happened as a leader should is not the right word but ITS Have to
Shes have to speak about that
say this prsn is 👎 and still got nobel.. I obviously should be leading against stray strain
say skip don't do that
y jail ur own
heroes being too good(?)
s leong that horrible
what the hel is the coup about
so unnecessary deaths
I’m here after military took power
yhh
What Happened?
Same. I only happened to see the detainment news story of her on Al Jezeera, flicking through the Channels.. Painting her a 'hero of the people', and "baseless" and no evidence of election fraud. Since AJ is Cultural Marxist with a pro Globalist UN agenda anyways, I'm digging for the truth about this Woman, and how todays events came to be. Don't trust the msm narrative.
pls subscribe to my channel :)))
Al jajira
Continuing the disappointing trend of Nobel peace prize winner, perhaps the Nobel community should consider nominating Thanos for his work in peace to the universe
Gon Freecs 👏🏽👏🏽😂😂😂
@Papyrus Okagbue Yasser Arafat was not a terrorist leader! You watch too much TV
They should only give out peace prize long after the person is dead. That's how Chinese created their gods and sages.
Love you. Be my friend 🤩
@Papyrus Okagbue Palestine
This video didn't spend enough time speaking about her "fall"
Bcz she has not fallen yet..she still in power
@@Gamer_2047_ Her fall is about her actions and perception, not just simply being in power or not. She rose in captivity fam.
@@Gamer_2047_ from fighting for freedom to genocide is a bloody fall in my eyes.
@@Alex632 doesnt matter what you perceive. If a ruler has to kill few thousands to protect millions, i m fine with it
@@Dim.g0v hmm so i think its time to bring freedom and democracy to Myanmar??
Did not go into enough detail about the ethnic cleansing
Boss Lax316 i think its bcs NTW already has a stand alone video regarding to that issue
Boss Lax316 Can you explain what happened? I’ve never heard of her
i agree with u and this is my comeent as well
@@aazizpratama2683 ah, didn't know that
@chemicalhorror A)They have a history of taking actions against religions that aren't their own especially Muslims. B) They are one of Burma's top trade partners
I believe the people of Myanmar voted for her because she was the only person who stood against the military regime. The people chose her because they wanted freedom. She only fought for her people and I don’t think it’s fair to blame her for doing so. The entire problem is so complicated.
The people of Myanmar are still in the grasp of the military regime till this day. It’s only a matter of time till they retake control and commit more atrocities.
dude i feel so sorry for some people blaming her for all the things she hasn't done and can't help cuz she hasn't got full authoritative power
I imagine that Aung San Suu Kyi is still being pressured by the military.
You were right. They have taken back control
You called it
Genocide is not an atrocitie under your witch’s charge?
a comment from Thailand :
It's easy to put all the blame on her, without taking note that she can't control even one conscript in the army. Why don't you help her to get full democracy first.
Thanks Thailand 🇹🇭, love you guys a lot! ❤️
But he could have denounced them instead of protecting the military and if you say that he will get fired for critisizing the government than he should go with it if he truly belive and uphold his principale rather than ignoring the atrocities that is happening in his country just so he could keep his position as president albeit a ceremonial president who didnt have the power to control the military
@@jkokbar1261 They would definitely assassinate her before you even know.
@@jkokbar1261 it’s like she’s standing up with a dagger on her chin.
Well in that case if she’s so innocent why doesn’t she resign ? She clearly supports the politics and actions of the politics, she’s clearly not what she was portrayed to be that’s why some in denial people will continue wagging their tails behind this murderer and try justify her actions, that are outright inhumane and oppressive.
This kind of video is precisely why I tend to avoid western (especially american) sources on international matters. As many have pointed out in the comments, she never really had too much power to begin with. Myanmar was more of an experimental democracy rather than a real functioning democratic state. Military still controls at least 25% of the seats (as part of a constitutional law) and have entire control over several factions of the government, including internal security.
The video falls on its face when dealing with the complexity of the issue. As usual, everything is analyzed and understood through the highly biased lens of american ideology and it just ends up vomiting a useless speech that doesn't really gets us any closer to understanding the situation.
YES OF COURSE, Pretty Much More Clear And Precise You Are Mr.??? God Is The Greatest. Very Good! SNR.
They killed Gaddaffi
I've been Burma myself. A beautiful place with an interesting culture and beautiful people. The story of Suu Kyi is perceived differently from the people of Burma to Western Social Media. This guy like many can't get enough info about the stem issues of Burma. I was lucky to meet a local who was brave enough to talk to me about the politics. Don't believe everything you hear. Research and open your perspective.
You're right! People want to make some noise rather than take care of heir own things.....that's a piece of life...
Lol, if your family where lifelong detained from there rights and burned alive, you wouldn’t be advocating her crimes.
Felicia, your comment has fair judgement and wise suggestion.
True they don't want know how Burma is, the reporter vew is from western world perspective,
Bring back the remains of king Thibow and crown his great grandson..
The perfect example of:
"You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become a villain."
I remember a girl cosplayed her during a peace rally in my school.
Her Peace Prize should be revoked...
Wait,a girl *cosplayed* Aung San Suu Kyi?? Wtf?😂😂😂😂
@Xx BigBoss xX
Nah, people leave from Burma, from her rule...can't really be good
Dhimmi
@@jonnathan7908
Yea,
She just changed her hairdo, wore that colourful dress...
While, I was made Dalai Lama and shaved my hair off.
Some people get off easy...
I still remember how western politician praise her and west media gave her compliment, but I think we can say this, maybe just for developing country, if your leader pleased everyone in west, that
s means he or she did what west want, not their own people want.
Well now it's the opposite. The west doesn't like her anymore, but her own people do.
I do not think that is necessarily true... I think she has been very compliant with what the majority of Burmans want, that is to say, the expulsion of Rohingya. The issue is not that she is disobeying the will of Burmans; it is that the will of Burmans is genocidal.
So what you are saying is that she is not a villian, but the people of Myanmar are murdering bigots and she enables them in order to hold onto power. How very very sad.
true
Jokowi, the president of Indonesia is one of them.
Listen, people! She does not have the power, the military does.
@Rouli Kumari listen u first!!!! firstly, not all the forces are controlled by DASSK, secondly,, things are not as easy as u may well think stupid!! politics is complicated!!
@Rolly Kumari she can lose her power of she do so.
@rollykumari 25% in parliament is military. It was never the winning party i.e sukyi's party doing . The constitution was written by millitary government. The winning party has been trying to change it for years but military is stopping it. Military would meddle with politics getting attention elsewhere and doing things. It is indeed complicated to say the least.
@Rolly Kumari stfu librandu i support Myanmar love from india
@@abhimanyujha5550 You definitely know about those Bangladeshis, Assam also had the same issue years ago. Thanks for the support India 🇮🇳!
She rises and will still remain the same. There will be never ‘fall’ of her in Myanmar people’s heart.
Imagine your family were denounced from their civilian rights and then burnt alive, raped and banished into the rivers, would you have the same love for her as a government. Please don’t forget humanity and the livelihood of others. Remover whatever you do to people comes back to you.
Wai Yan Minn Aung .
@@NotAleenaAlt2 dude that guy is from burma also me im commenting this in yangon
well nobody cares about 'your people's' heart only. your people are not the only people there. when looking at the overall rohingya issue and the number of civillians who were murdered, and her inaction, its clear that she's still an utter disgusting failure
Yes our family and villages were burned. We still love her.
I think the way to democracy and peace among the different ethnical groups is still a struggle. We, as Westerners, have long forgotten how difficult it was and how many compromises should be made to protect an infant and still fragile democracy. I think time will tell what she truly is. I wish for the best.
What she truly is, is that she's a powerless leader. She's just a symbol, an idol of Myanmar democracy. This is why she complied to the Junta narratives, becoming their mouthpiece to spread lies about the genocide of Rohingnya. Which the consequence still feel today across nations with the mounting problems of refugees and the desperate actions to fulfill their needs.
Now she's just an obscure old woman that the world shun and forget about.
@@vuvuvu6291 are you from myanmar?
@@vuvuvu6291 are you from myanmar?
@@bluecircle06 I'm from Indonesia
“…. Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson explains what is really happening in Burma/Myanmar and why it is relevant to us.
On February 1, the Burmese military took over the country, nullifying the results of a fraudulent election from November which had installed liberal, color revolutionary, media darling Aung San Suu Kyi. From a westernized, very wealthy family, Kyi was educated in the west and serves the CIA and the Soros-banker fronts explicitly.
In the aftermath of the November 8 elections, the color revolutionaries allegedly won 396 out of 476 seats in parliament, cutting the military-based parties from political relevance. The military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) insists that the CIA and its local agents rigged the elections, citing 10.5 million cases of irregularities. These have led to mass protests in all major states and cities of the country.
The purpose of this fraudulent election is to enshrine liberalism over the political life of the country, which is a way to pull Burma out of its pro-China policy. More broadly, the point is to break the development of the New Silk Road project, a multi-trillion dollar, anti-liberal infrastructure project unifying the Eurasian plain against the west. If liberalism has the IMF, the WTO and Davos as its institutional representatives, the anti-liberal movement has the New Silk Road. The coup against liberalism in Burma has immense geopolitical consequences few realize…..”
The problem with the reporting of Suu Kyi is that people assume that the NLD has the power to do what it wants. They cannot. The military would overthrow them at a seconds notice if given the opportunity. The country’s security forces are therefore free to conduct a campaign to deliberately undermine her on the world stage by imprisoning journalists and conducting a major genocide - or at least allowing paramilitary groups to. I’m not sure if - given she has no real power to stop it - it is worth praising her for bringing democracy to Myanmar and I’m certainly not sure that remaining silent and not taking a stand and bidding her time is the right decision, but I do believe that she has been badly misunderstood and the calls to strip her of her Noble Peace Prize are misguided and will give the military what it wants, her government damage.
@@sakuradeva555 both sides have hurt and i guess that's right to say " fear on both sides" and besides , some media are overacting on this thing from the side of rohingyas. in my opinion, only real and true and fair news and opinions should be liberated.
@@sakuradeva555 first, this whole thing ( as u say, genocide) is not just done by the military but also AA is involving. So if someone wants to complain this, they should be aware that this case is responsible not just to the myanmar military. Second, myanmar military is not under the control of DASSK and all those shootings and battles are not ordered by DASSK . so in brief, military literally doesn't obey the officially elected authority of myanmar in which DASSK is leading. plus, i don't really know who's behind these tragic murders but let me tell you something, this thing is not done by DASSK, nor ordered by her and the whole planned things (idk) are done without her knowledge. and media are sharing the unsure news about this thing, maximizing the problems and making the people all over the world to misunderstand all the situations including you. i haven't been to the war zone , neither you and all of us, and there could be many possibilities between these and plus, even these news are real or whatever,, what else can we do except sittin g on the chair , keep up to date the news and kindly wish the victims the best. please don't judge so fast.
ps. rohingyas ( the term u used ) is actually fake. there aren't no rohingyas and the whole made up story of those people. there were some indians or bangaladesh living there hundreds of years but they aren't rohingyas at all. the ancestors of indians or bangaladesh living there were brought to here to work in the early industrialization in the industries. ( factual record!! thanks me later)
the population of those people wasn't that great that time. so the growth of those people must be due to the rapid child births and plus, across the border, huge amount of people from bangaladesh illegally came into myanmar many times and see? now they are asking for their own land. that's what happen when we just ignored for years, their population is unbelievable now.
@@sakuradeva555 I surely believe now you know mass support mean nothing compare to power of guns. But get your facts straight before you put sensitive topics on table.
@@sakuradeva555 As for the inaccurate reporting, You should really check Human Rights Watch (HRW),International Crisis Group . Reliable report boldly report against propaganda. I not saying military did not committed ferocious responses. They even killing their own people for power. I just want you to know to point at right direction.
Yes-exactly. Most are quick to call her "fallen" and do not spend time to educate themselves on the complexities of it all.
As a southeast asian, I am regretful of the current situation in Myanmar in contrast to the development in other southeast asian countries. This just perfectly shows how political unrest can hamper the progress of a country.
@Papyrus Okagbue I am sorry to hear that and to have made hasty conclusions.
I wish peace to you and your country.
I'm a Burmese and after seeing this documentary, I feel very disappointed to be point out to our leader. We have been under our own government for over 50 years by so called "Military". And many people died and sacrifices for their life to get freedom for Aung San Su Kyi who is a daughter of General Aung San. She brings peace and democracy which we didn't have since President U Thein Sain (Military). Falls for her would be the trash she have to face that the last government had left. She have to clean those trash while other military based party people want to rebel against her to get military back. So I don't want any of those cold war within our country and being tortured by military so called "Union Solidarity and Development Party" for a long year since my grandparent's parent. The generation from Union Solidarity and Development Party people are not willing to win Aung San Su Kyi 'cause they are afraid that their freedom and trade will stop and their money income will close. So I don't want people from the world to see Daw Aung San Su Kyi as a bad leader, instead she is fixing the country fault by those people from Union Solidarity and Development Party. Thank you.
Aung San Suu Kyi never falls. She is always rising. We support her
Ha, the moment when west hates her is the moment she became the real hero of her people
she just became against the taste of west. and the hateness of them began
Then i think the whole population have a problem in their mindset. Whatever you say you cant defend myanmar for the killing of Rohingya.
She is expressing her true self now, or someone evil doing it from behind. But it is evil work. Not only the west we the neighbour bangladeshis think the same.
Of course you think that way. The Rohingya are Bangladeshi spies planted into Burma.
@@TracyDomenica wow 2 million people?
Living there for 400 years
Spies?
Or a country which is in neutrality with Myanmar
Either your ISLAMOPHOBIC, xenophobic, racist , dumb or not well educated about this exact matter
@Arun s well...
The civil war in chattagram ended in 1980s and yes violence between the chakma and Bangladeshi government forces break down once in a while
But it's not a *Genocide* like Myanmar
Most people in comment say like they know every problem in Myanmar in detail because of this single video
its really sad that one low IQ video can have so much influence and that most people will not go on to do further research. Those who posted this video either is not aware of the harm it has caused or doesn't care because it's making profit from it. Heartbreaking.
@@uziaoki3532 The power of internationl news my friend, really sad the ones who actually know can't change it.
U seem now much tell me more
As mentioned in this video multiple times, she was given unimaginable choices throughout her political career, and the Rohingya crisis was one of them. She never held the power to command the military, but she took the blame because she was the leader of the government at the time on paper. And as always, she made the difficult decision to not go up against the military generals which would have resulted in another coup. She chose to keep one hand on the wheel to steer instead of letting go of both hands. If you think this is some bs, just look at what happened on Feb 1st, 2021. Another military coup the day before the parliament was due to swear in the NLD members who won the 2020 election by a landslide. The generals are still in complete control of the military. But fortunately for burmese people, everything she sacrificed and faced, which would break a normal person hundred times over, are for the country and its people, not for a prize. One thing to be clear, in the hearts of burmese people across the world, there will never, NEVER be “the fall of Aung San Suu Kyi”. Because she is a mother to us.
She even supported the genocide and said about the Rohingya, that she doesn't care, because "they are not even burmese".
She never said.
@@kikikoko607 when did she said? Prove it mf. Don't fking believe the rumors of others.
@@pantherhmtd2683 I watched a videpo with her saying those things. This woman is a monster!
“…. Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson explains what is really happening in Burma/Myanmar and why it is relevant to us.
On February 1, the Burmese military took over the country, nullifying the results of a fraudulent election from November which had installed liberal, color revolutionary, media darling Aung San Suu Kyi. From a westernized, very wealthy family, Kyi was educated in the west and serves the CIA and the Soros-banker fronts explicitly.
In the aftermath of the November 8 elections, the color revolutionaries allegedly won 396 out of 476 seats in parliament, cutting the military-based parties from political relevance. The military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) insists that the CIA and its local agents rigged the elections, citing 10.5 million cases of irregularities. These have led to mass protests in all major states and cities of the country.
The purpose of this fraudulent election is to enshrine liberalism over the political life of the country, which is a way to pull Burma out of its pro-China policy. More broadly, the point is to break the development of the New Silk Road project, a multi-trillion dollar, anti-liberal infrastructure project unifying the Eurasian plain against the west. If liberalism has the IMF, the WTO and Davos as its institutional representatives, the anti-liberal movement has the New Silk Road. The coup against liberalism in Burma has immense geopolitical consequences few realize…..”
POV: You're here because of the military coup.
The west stands united in judging other countries' matters!
She is the daughter of someone who could be termed as 'father of the nation', military hero if you will. She was also supported by the vast majority of the people. Her army was every single member of the country. If anything had happened to her civil war would have been inevitable. So the army than gave her a filmsy position and she accepted, even knowing that she wouldn't have any real power. Which I believe was pretty cowardly.
How can you call her cowardly when she took on so much to improve the lives of the Burmese people and spent a good part of her life in prison for the cause of a free Burma?
this comment aged so well
We need Myanmar to be democratic. If they are, that’s one more huge loss for China and the CCP
her "fall" is a western term to say she was doing her country interests and not the west's
She is trying to reconcile the elected government and the army . The military took advantage of that doing what they want.Everybody blame this for Suu Kyi.
"you die early to see yourself a hero or Live long enough to see yourself a villain"
So this got me thinking like this:
She got into power and understood the geopolitical situation of her country and what it actually takes to keep her country together. After she understood this she was still willing to do good by her country even if it meant sullying her own good name in the world and becoming the villain responsible for thousands or even tens of thousands of deaths.
In a twisted turn of black irony she has finally proven herself to be a true patriot.
The conclusion of this essay is really off. You can never compare how western philosophy to the philosophy of Myanmar. It's their country and I believe people there are strong enough to do what is best for their own country.
Aung San Suu Kyi is doing what she can with the limited scope that she has and a bunch of imbeciles here talking about her fall. Do you have any idea about the situation was in and still now?
From a personal standpoint, I can understand why she has become the leader she is. It took her over two decades to win her fight to end military rule in Myanmar, and now that she's in power to rule the country, she doesn't want to do anything that risks her being disposed. This is not a justification for what she's allowed since coming to power of course; just an explanation for why she may be governing the way she is.
We support the Burmese people against tyranny, but we don't forget the Rohingyas, all people being equal, deserving life free from harm and peril. It is a pity that Aung San Suu Kyi ruined her reputation and image before the world community.
And it's also the only budhist country to have laws against lgbt people
@@maavet2351 That's a good thing.
Propaganda can ruin alot of things.
Everyone in the comment section is either being racist towards Burmese people or being racist towards Westerners. Haha, I love this world :D
SAVAGE COMMENT 😂😂😂
@P M ah well thanks I guess? idk I'm not updated on my own politics + I'm pretty young
@@fancycream833 ty Qiyana ;)
When does she falls?
She still winning Myanmar people's heart.
She’s definitely not winning the hearts of the ethnics
@@sawlawehwahwahpoehtoo4624 i just want to laugh to your comment. I was born and live in kayin state and all of my karen friends love her so much than me.
@@aunghlaing4649and I know many there who don’t 😂🤷♂️
@@sawlawehwahwahpoehtoo4624 I was born and raised in Mon state, she’s one of the reasons why we’re still living in Myanmar :)
Inside the mind of politicians:
"MORE POWER BABY!!!"
it takes time. She knows feel good words wont solve a broken country. Has the Dalai lama freed Tibet no. Has Hilary become president. No. Unlike Nelson Mandela, Myanmar is not a black and white issue. She has said nothing negative about the rohingyas. In fact, constant repatriation efforts are being made. Just because shes not speaking loudly does not mean she is not doing something. What about new zealand that agreed to assist myanmar in repatriation efforts. fifty muslim folks are shot by a white folk in a country where cohabitation of two cultures are politically forced but minds are not changed. Where in the non muslim world are muslims safe. Do muslim countries also willingly house the Rohingya muslim brothers.
Furthermore, this is a race issue, not a religious issue. Muslims of every other ethnicity and Buddhist majority in Myanmar coexist in the imperfect, impoverished, dictator ruled world that is Myanmar for over sixty years. It is only with the Rohingya rebels who attacked rohingya hindus and villages, massacring hundreds. Look at amnesty international. Since the time of the world wars, they fought with the enemy to get land from Myanmar to join with bangladesh, and in the end were hated for it and made stateless by the army that found them a threat. Instead of assimilating into Myanmar, rebels still largely exist, always attacking the resting monster that is the Myanmar army. Mind you the myanmar army does not care for the country and will eliminate anything in its way to attack Aung San Suu Kyi. And they just became the target. Even then, Suu Kyi is trying what she can do. Rohingyas can come back, the identification process is still long and tedious. And yet there are rohingya rebels lurking among the innocent refugees, refusing to go back demanding land from Rakhine region, land that historically belonged to the rakhine folks since ancient times, its not even Burmese historical land. Imagine the chaos the country would be in if Suu Kyi became a yes man to the international world and not see the traps laid out for her
MO POWA BEBEH !!!!
@@porkoholic u have no idea what Myanmar is like do you?
Allah gives rope to the opressors for a while... So that they will increase in their blindness... Then he will pull the rope in and all will be judged... And the punishment of the oppressors will begin... And it won't end... EVER
Omfg this allah cult everywhere.
she rose as a western puppet, she "fell" as a national hero.
Precisely!
Exactly
Weill If she was a puppet by western, why she hated by them now? Pls explain it logically.
Pong Poull The Khmer Nationalist but you said she was a puppet, so for sure she did that because the puppet master wanted her to.
her so called fell in the west is the best proof of her being a patriot.
She never fall (definitely for us). Ask everyone in Myanmar. Most says she is still the best. We just had municipal elections for Yangon and her party backed candidates won.
We want a leader who will build our future, not a puppet who always listens to the west.
Stop mentioning one sided story and stop bullying us via big media.
She just wants to defend her nation from radical groups who had already eaten the middle-central Asia.
exactly!! im from myanmar too and i completely agree that she is the best leader who's trying her best during these hard struggles! and media is too overacting on the side from the refugees.
Ask anyone? does that include the people, who are being killed?
She's still alive, that's what matters.
Look at her father, assassinated at 32.
Then look at the military dictator, lived till 92 and probably died of natural causes.
I'm sure she's bidding her time for the greater good.
Hellota good she would be for her country if she's 6 feet under.
She's not perfect but I genuinely believe that SHE WILL PREVAIL.
good people die faster than evils do. that's how saturn works.
@@phyuphyuthin4260 wtf?
she did the right thing, to ignore the wierd west double standard.
Well, fall only in the eyes of International community. Not in Myanmar.
Too true. It is horrific to see a nation who's unity rests on the genocide of a million of their countrymen.
@Salterino Kripperino That does not Justified all of the stupid things they did. you know that all nation in south east asia were colonized at one time right. Do they committing genocide to the descendants of the people that colonized them ? NO. because the war is OVER. Myanmar is being ruled by Fear and propaganda. They need an enemy so they can have public support
@AcidicPlant Studios well i agree with you that calling it propaganda maybe an exaggeration and no i dont think she did this. Its more likely that the military faction just join the hatred and use it to gain more support since rohingya can be seen as "invader" and military as the "savior"
@@appleislander8536
Mass slaughter of terrorists*
Totally justified.
Now that she's got rid of those naughty Muslim minority Rohingyas
What if the military is forcing her to do what shes doing, and if she doesn't they will cause mass devastation no one like her can just change like that
2 D'Auteuil Yes! That is exactly the case, all these westerners in the comment section are just focusing their sights on the "atrocities" That Aung San Su Kyi committed, we Burmese people know this fact. Aung San Su Kyi still does not have enough power to create a long lasting change however she is fighting and still very much fighting for it. It's so painful to see our national hero considered a mass murderer and power hungry politician
Recently found out I am a little bit of Rohingya. Even though she is not handling the Rohingya situation well, I still believe she is a good human being.
"A bad thing cannot make a good person bad"
- The Power Rangers Movie
thumbs up!
Agree. She barely has any power over the military
She still has the option to denounce the inhumane genocide or even show some kind of empathy you’d expect a human to show, but she has shown nothing but hostility ?! Imagine you and your loved ones, were denounced from their civilian rights and then burnt alive, raped and banished would you have the same acceptance of her as a ‘powerless government’ ? If you have any love for humanity you wouldn’t say what you have said.
She can't really help the rohingya people, She'd be shot dead. The military is the one killing and torturing the Rohingya people.
Aung San Sukyi is a Burmese first of all. She was fighting for Burmese freedom, not for the foreigners in Burma. Foreigners may not adore her anymore, but she is still her father's daughter, and all Burmese understand and respect that.
The first thing that comes to my mind after watching this film is "Why do I expect others to be all perfect and saintly when I am definitely not". I am just a human being babe.
From a cosmic perspective.. This lady literally fought an army without an army of her own.. I understand she has the populis on her side, but how can an entire army be kept at Bay by a single woman
I think you haven't taken into account all the factors here. She is the daughter of someone who could be termed as 'father of the nation', military hero if you will. She was also supported by the vast majority of the people. Her army was every single member of the country. If anything had happened to her civil war would have been inevitable. So the army than gave her a filmsy position and she accepted, even knowing that she wouldn't have any real power. Which I believe was pretty cowardly.
am i the only one who feels bad for Michael (Suu Kyi’s husband) 😞☹️😢RIP MICHAEL
he was a humble man and he fully understood the struggle she was facing
He died - as we all do and for a Buddhist that's no big deal
I feel bad for the Rohingya
@@ZaidKhan-dc4wo so true....
@@ZaidKhan-dc4wo Didn’t ask
Myanmar deserves to define its own destiny not according to the west's definition. It all started from the west dethroning the country's royal ruler which dimmed the vision of the people's national identity. Myanmar has its own way of finding itself. So let it be. One with your struggles in prayer Myanmar.
A woman experienced with such tragedy should've had an empathy but I guess she rather satisfy greed for power. Ironic!
well we guess we know now that she was never in power in the first place
Do you know about Myanmar politics????? I am sure you don't know clearly. Because you only see cover of myanmar . But most of politicial and mass are know how her standing.
using the past as a political tool to genocide the innocent decendent of the Rohingiya people. You are cold blooded spineless rat
Sir I am literally from Burma.. and i think u need to open ur eyes and educate urself 😐
@@Aester Military's Genocide has nothing to do with her...
give us facts on your side instead of "you dont know anything "
if she had made some mining contracts with western companies she would have been regarded in far higher regards. This is very much frustrating western freedom capitalists.
It's a shame all these contracts are already made with China when military backed party controlled the government.
I have no respect for the Noble Peace Prize and ALL of its winners.
The nomination and selection of the winners are very arbitrary. So often they are awarded to the so-called "Human Rights" fighters.
In reality, the world peace has almost nothing to do with the "Human Rights".
this info is just what is made public, behind the scenes its totally different.
Thanks
Your comment stands for both sides, fair and wise thought.
yup
it's not just that she didn't have control over the military but the military already took 25% of unelected spots in the parliament and you need 75% votes to change anything on the 2008 Constitution written by the military government. You also have the USDP party (ex-military) in the parliament and the nonelected 25% plus them always refuse to change anything in Constitution that will lessen the power and control they have over the country
She never fall .We Myanmar people love her.Your western master can retake all the prize which was given to her but they can never claim the love of myanmar 🇲🇲 people on her.
She is non violent when the violence is directed at her,
She is the mother of Myanmar and the people will always love her after all the sacrifice that she did for her country
She has been under house arrest for a majority of her life to fight for democracy for the people of Burma to have equal rights. She does not appear to me as power hungry politician nor a person behind the genocide, it’s the military regime that control this power and killing innocent ppl as they always had. She took no place in harming other human beings in her mother country.
Agreed.
The British government invaded and occupied Bangladesh and Myanmar. They created this situation, and now they want to transfer blame to this 78 year old woman who sits in a Myanmar prison. This is her reward for her loyalty to western intel agencies.
Was this an additional prize to the frogman they sent to her house in 2009?
I have a hard time imagining her working for foreign powers than it is to believe they're the very ones keeping her out to ensure the countries opium productions maintained.
I'm from Burma you can ask me any questions regarding this issue. You deserve to know what is actually happening here and not what the western media portrays
Hi, I'm doing some research for my world politics class. I'm curious, how do the people of Burma see the violence and claimed ethnic cleansing against the Rohingya? Do you guys agree with the governments handling of them, or do you think it is bad? What are your general thoughts on the Rohingya?
Imagine you and your loved ones, were denounced from their civilian rights and then burnt alive, raped and banished would you have the same acceptance of her as a ‘powerless government’ ? If you have any love for humanity you wouldn’t spread ignorance.
@@yayeetyoyae362 The people here including myself sees the violence committed in the rakhine state as horrible. The goverment's plan to solve the crisis has backfired with us getting a terrible reputation in the west. However, the goverment here still contains remnants of the military junta with them having 25 percent of the parliamentary seats by default so the new elected democratic government is still quite limited in their choices. Our globalized generation mainly consisting of millenials and gen z acknowledge the horrible atrocities committed from both sides by our government attempting to control the crisis resulting several casualities considered to be ethnic cleansing and extermist rohingyas groups such as ARSA wreaking havoc on our soil.
@@NotAleenaAlt2 I understand where you are coming from and I respect that. We are not spreading ignorance either. But I would like you to listen to both sides of the story because this problem is incredibly complicated since it started during Birtish occupation in Myanmar. Many of our homes has been burnt down to the ground and our police stations attacked by their extremist groups too. No one is the innocent victim in this conflict when both sides commit horrible atrocities. We just gained our democractic rights just 4years ago and change will take a very long time for things to go right. Not to mention the remainings of the military junta that ruled burma with an iron fist since 1960 still has 25 percent of the power by default and the votes given to the party isnt even included yet. We are not just accpecting the democractic government as powerless either. New attempts have been made to abolish the 25 percent seats law that keeps giving the military rights to commit whatever atrocities they commit in rakhine state. The rohingyas were never denounced civilian rights because there was never one in the first place and we are all trying to grant them to get recognised as an official ethnic group of Myanmar.
I still can't believe that her husband died without her by his side omG
that's why they say she had sacrificed so much for myanmar. she's not a good wife nor a good mother but seems to be a good leader
because millions of people's freedom??
Pedro OK
No
That's why people of myanmar treat her like their own mother. Out side world know as The Lady. Inside myanmar know as The Mother. They always proud of call her mother.... She is the One..... The only one..
You get a noble prize and you get a noble prize and YOU to!
No..the noble prize has lost its value imo.
Norway and Sweden both pushed the prizes for propaganda purposes that has blown up in their faces time and time again.
Worse was 1968 when Sweden's central bank "donated" a "large sum" of money to hand out prizes in economics to celebrate their 300th anniversary.
A. Nobel specifically wrote that he did not want to give prizes in economics because it is too akin to philosophy with very little objectivity and predictive capacity therefore can be used to demagoguery/propaganda toward a person not the science or philosophy discovered.
Nobel left out mathematics, it would have made sense to add that one. But nope. Economics instead.
I wonder why?
not the noble prize in general, but only the noble 'peace' price
she was awarded it for her earlier works, why take that away from her? She's done more for the people of Myanmar than you or any of the millions of people in the world ever could.
It was never worth much considering it was established by the guy that invented dynamite
No one ever thought that maybe the military wanted to destroy the public and international image of Suu Kyi, and thus making her no longer a threat for them?
she could have resigned the power and told her party to give up the power that they are holding. But No, it is about numbers (majority is Buddhist, that will help her win again).
@@musadiqnoor1 that would just make her look more like the good person that was forced by the "baddies" to resign power.
By not letting her resign power and making her as a forced puppet, they would make her look like the evil woman that ordered the genocide and that the military is innocent and was just following orders.
I don't understand do you support her actions today or not. My point is when one knows that nothing is in one's hands then why stay in power (unless one is comfortable with the genocide).
@@musadiqnoor1 Well maybe because she can't. As i explained in my previous comment, if she does that, she would just be seen as the good guy. By resigning, as you said, would signify that she didn't really want this to happen and that maybe she was forced to take it all in.
She destroyed her image all by herself, by supporting and downplaying the genocide on the Rohingya with her own words! Live on TV!
While it is true that Aung San Suu Kyi doesn’t have much control over military, that does not excuse her from defending their genocide of the Rohingya Muslims. It also does not excuse her for cracking down on free speech and jailing journalists. This video also failed to mention how she has made virtually no progress regarding democracy since she’s taken power, and that she is defending the very military that had held her hostage. The Burmese government has remained as repressive as it was before she took power, and she has made no attempt at changing it. Her party holds legislative power yet they have changed very little in this country. I believe Suu Kyi has become obsessed with holding power.
I know it's been 2 years since you commented this but It's a totally a good excuse,in fact it doesn't even an excuse, It's a fact
It's not fair to judge her fall only from international point of view. She's still being loved by her citizen.
we love our Mother!!
@@williamdin3414 your mother act like nothing bad is happening in your country just because it's happening to a minority
@@eya3477 come to my country before you judge from the media. Some came and they know the truth what is really happening out here. Should a parents protect their own kids from stranger who abuse them? that's what she did. I'm just telling there is a story which media portrait only small portion of it.
She tried but she had to make difficult decisions maybe she is tired 😓 😩 exhausted 💤 of all the obstacles
trauma she had to face
The commentators in the comment section acts like they know enough to judge her. If you're a citizen of them I will give you a pass but even still, leaders has several informations at her that even their citizens doesn't know and to act having those informations is a careful decisive choice as a leader and not based on emotions.
John Mark ikr
She like
Before coming to power:oppose everything
After coming to power:support everything
When my lecturer showed this video to the class, I literally stood up and walked away.
Now you know how stupid person you're. 😀😀😀😀
@T T everyone growing with stupid things and i did it before so i am ok with your view.
Somehow Myanmar became a developed nation under her leadership
Developing brutallity and violence against innocent Rohingyas!
I don’t know but it seems that this video is very one sided on the Rohingya case. I’ve seen better videos explaining Rohingya on both sides and understood the situation better.
can you provide th links please i also wish to look into this matter in more depth
Myanmar doesn't want the Rohingya. We should instead pressure rich Muslim countries to take these people as refugees. Its their own people.
@@saiphapale2763 watch Geography Now
@@rumblefish9 yes. if myanmar is not yet ok to accept them, why don't bangaldesh accept all of them?? they are their people with same religion.
@@rumblefish9 Rotten Apple just cause they have the same religion doesn't make them there people , they are from myanmar it's their country too you have no right to try to kick them out just cause they are minority
Indeed, fear of losing power does corrupt.
She is hero and never fall ... Love her from India🇮🇳. Satan forgot that they killed 100 million hindu in medieval period . Myanmar🇲🇲 and china incident is their karma.
it turned out she is not a western puppet, but a real patriot instead. respect from China.
_she's now China's puppet_
@@thanglaka9543 protecting her country and people from islam is not being a puppet and she is sacrificing her own reputation and interest for it.. the european leaders who made their countries islamic sh*tholes full of no go zones , those are real puppets
@@poli4869 _getting more craps from you than expected_
Rising or falling determined by supporters in her country not by those biased western medias and so called human rights activists.
Most of the people commenting do not have a clue about what is happening inside Myanmar........including the video narrator
You can hate her but without her Myanmar won’t get the independent they have now
Independent then doing ethnic cleansing?? Clap your hand..
@@budakgombak8065 no.. just sending illegal aliens back to where they came from
@@aunlii7843 , woww.. you are so human.. you mean sending back by killing them all right..
@@budakgombak8065 no again. just fighting against ARSA terrorists and anyone who support them
@@aunlii7843 sorry? Even killing baby? Your reason so reasonable. Everyone all over the world what Myanmar doing to Rohingya. Killing thousands of people. We call them buddhist-terrorists. Because the terrorists who killed Rohingya ethnic are buddhist. I dont know are they armies or not. But for sure they are the terrorists.
You do realize that Military Junta still hold immense power in Burma, yeah?
True, she could be saying what she is saying, so they won't shoot her in the face.
@@bishop51807 yep, maybe she biding time untill she gets the full power over her countryl. But it's unlikely to happen tho.
This video portrays her as a sort of Churchill to Myanmar, but the comments have been ripping this apart.
Gandhi has bigger balls than her. She is nothing compared to that legend. India’s freedom struggle was much more bloodier than myanmar can ever cook up. The more i grew up, the more I appreciated Gandhi.
Aung San Suu Kui "rose" because she loved her country and the way she pursuit Myanmar's national interest met the taste of the West. Aung San Suu Jui "felt" because she loved her country and the way she pursuit Myanmar's national interest was against the taste of the West. As far as I am concerned, she has remained the same all the time. And who are the people from the West to determine whether she was right or wrong? The Muslim minority in Rohingya was made up of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh and they were talking about carving the Rakhine State of Burma to build their own country. If the West is so benevolent, why don't they just take in the Muslim minority to their own countries and let them build their own nation there? Hypocrisy.
thumbs up to your comment!! illegal immigrants from bangaladesh is messing this up since they want the SPACE, WHICH IS CALLED THEIR OWN COUNTRY BY THE OVERLY RELIGIOUS PEOPLE AND DASSK IS STUCKING BETWEEEN THESE THINGS WHICH EVEN MADE HER CALLED ''''POWER HUNGRY POLITICIAN''' . so sick of those people who only know to judge and blame on their non-business things
It si not about “freedom fighter” or “heroine “ in the eyes of the west . Ridiculous, political morality as seen in the west is a way of governing people . Who or what give them the right to judge all other cultures under same standards . She is doing what needs to be done in Myanmar for the yes and for the culture of those people . You people in the west can not understand, because you people are not Burmese.
Aung San Suu Kyi literally proved the adage "...think globally.. act locally...". I think her conscious stand on rohinga issue was in the long-term interest of Myanmar. Future will show that her critical decision in fact justified the spirit of Nobel peace prize. The potential of perpetual violence in Myanmar will be less than it would have been. She proved herself a patriot who sacrificed her personal interests in favor of her country.
In 2005, I went to Burma on two week holiday. During sightseeing tour of Rangoon, I told my guide to show me the house of The Lady who was under house arrest. The guide turned pale, looked terrified and didn't take me near her house.
Non violence is not an answer to violence. Peace isn't the only state that is necessary War is good and needed for freedom.
I think someone is pulling trigger from her shoulder. Feel sad for Rohingyas. 😢
I think she is under some pressure...once she had all, she'll show her power...
Something is missing...
before u criticize Suu Kyi, should know a little bit about Myanmar's constitution.
She should be remembered for her stubbornness and her self righteousness, and her unwillingness to help the helpless and oppressed.
Do something for Rohingya people. Then we will show compassion for you....
She will be known for the ethnic cleansing of Rohingya people.
that is not her fault because myanmar's army is not under her control
@@akaisora415 see her past interviews about this incident. You will understand.
@@TiimelessTales i have seen it already and i know what is real and what is fake because i live there
You are just an arrogant freak who knows nothing regarding the incident. Yet you Have the audacity to comment. See her interviews you moron. According to her Rohingya's are to blame for their condition.
@@TiimelessTales i may be the arrogant freak but i dont act like i know everything about other country's political stuffs
The coup took me here. Praying for peace ☮️
The Rohingya in SEA is more like taliban in Middle East
Very rarely freedom fighters are good presidents/country leaders, it requires different leadership qualities.
They often leave power the same way they got in and rule their nations. By violence.
For a lady whom delivers such strong message and the people change the mind. It's more than enough.
All those defending her - have you not heard her PUBLIC statements which amount to hate speech against the Rohingya population? She knows her words have an impact and that’s how she chooses to use said impact. It’s not about whether the Junta still holds real power - of course it does. It’s about a ‘non violence icon’ contributing immensely to a genocidal climate.
Myanmar is an underdeveloped country and there are many problems in different sectors; in politics, economics, education, health etc. As a leader of such a poor country, which is trying to stand on the road of democracy, she needs to think in different perspectives/angles- not just one side so that our country doesn't fall back to rule of the old government. We, the majority of Myanmar citizens who want Democracy, believe in her. We have faith in her. Please judge when you do know her situation. Please ask yourself how much you know about Myanmar before you judge? ( P.S We respect your concern about our country and care for Rohingya in Rakhine, thanks.)
It is funny that this does not speak how the military in still in charge of the country. And that Suu Kyi power is actually not that strong if indeed you want to criticize her be honest about the realities on ground. Yes she should be stronger in her criticism of the military but painting the situation on ground as a simply she is the reason why is happening is happening is just silly.please stop making simple narratives about important issues
We used to live across from her when I was a kid. There was a lake and our house was on the opposite side. There was so many silent protests that turned violent from the government with massive deaths of the people
Why do Burmese people hate and oppress the Rohingya? What did this powerless minority to the Burmese majority? She also supported the genocide. Do you have an answer to that question? Because I would like to hear your point of view.
Google recommends this and I'm watching video that have been uploaded a year ago. This is a good insight of what happened in the last 2 weeks in myanmar. Thanks for recommendations.
She is still a hero...they sacrificed their life to free MYANMAR thats all you must understand Duh....