Pretty sure the Zerrows are not made in the same factory as they are located in Ibaraki, northeast of Tokyo. And the Skoobs are made in Asakusa, Tokyo. The Lofgrens for sure are made in the same factory as other brands. They do have a similar aesthetic and certainly quality level. They do fit rather different though.
how do you compare the size with Mr. lou? like -1 as you said in the video? You are 11.5 E in mr. Lou and this one is 10.5D. it is really down one size! Thanks mate. The boots looks really cool. nice choice always!
@@jtang5210 I haven’t tried an Attractions 444 or any Attractions yet. What I gather from research though is that the Skoob has a higher instep and has a different toe shape that is Munson like in comparison. I don’t really need both a Skoob and an Attractions engineer, so I have these Skoobs that fit me well. I believe the sizing for the Attractions engineers is true to size, maybe a half down max.
@@jtang5210 Yeah, I take the Lou true to size as an 11.5E and the Skoob as a 10.5D. The Lou has a more varied shape/fit with an unnecessarily large heel cup, tighter waist, and wider ball followed with narrow/flat toe box. The Skoob feels more straight forward and anatomical but has a pretty high instep. They both fit mechanically well 🤷🏼😂
@@CsawBoots Yes I agreed with you, I also think the toe shape of Skoob is better than attractions especially after couples of wears. As I understood, Attractions are the same size as John lofegren and mr. Lou(E to D). The skoob is -1 size and -1width, it makes me more referring to whites. I am ok fit in mr. lou 9E and also fit on white's nomad 8D. does that happen to you the same or similar like this? Thank you for your reply mate. I share the same taste of your boots collections. very great.
@@jtang5210 That’s what works for me. I’m White’s I go with 10.5E and can do 11E 55 or 67 last. For the Wesco MP1339 (Mister Lou) I do tts 11.5E, and for the MP95 can do 11D. For Lofgren engineers I do tts again 11.5D with a thin insert because the instep is pretty high, I can fit into the 11D but the toes are a bit crowded. For Zerrows, the 11E fits perfect. The Role Club engineers are 29.5E and the best fit of all my pull ons. And Skoob, I like the 10.5D for the engineer and the m-43. The Skoobs are the most narrow of these but fit well.
Great boots! Skoob has some nice boondockers as well.
@@nvrp813 They really do! Now they I know the sizing, I’m definitely eyeing those m-43’s.
They look very similar to my leather things motor boots especially the shape of the last. Thx for the video.
@@davel2734 I was thinking the same exact thing. That’s really the closest comparison, which is a good thing.
Niicee,, i never heard of this brand, thanks for showing em to us 🙂
@@toneohm Definitely an underrated brand!
Those made by same factory as Zerrows and Lofgren? They look like it.
Pretty sure the Zerrows are not made in the same factory as they are located in Ibaraki, northeast of Tokyo. And the Skoobs are made in Asakusa, Tokyo. The Lofgrens for sure are made in the same factory as other brands. They do have a similar aesthetic and certainly quality level. They do fit rather different though.
Hi mate, do you think it is close to attractions Lot 444 horse butt engineering boots? You have good taste mate!
how do you compare the size with Mr. lou? like -1 as you said in the video?
You are 11.5 E in mr. Lou and this one is 10.5D. it is really down one size!
Thanks mate. The boots looks really cool. nice choice always!
@@jtang5210 I haven’t tried an Attractions 444 or any Attractions yet. What I gather from research though is that the Skoob has a higher instep and has a different toe shape that is Munson like in comparison. I don’t really need both a Skoob and an Attractions engineer, so I have these Skoobs that fit me well. I believe the sizing for the Attractions engineers is true to size, maybe a half down max.
@@jtang5210 Yeah, I take the Lou true to size as an 11.5E and the Skoob as a 10.5D. The Lou has a more varied shape/fit with an unnecessarily large heel cup, tighter waist, and wider ball followed with narrow/flat toe box. The Skoob feels more straight forward and anatomical but has a pretty high instep. They both fit mechanically well 🤷🏼😂
@@CsawBoots Yes I agreed with you, I also think the toe shape of Skoob is better than attractions especially after couples of wears. As I understood, Attractions are the same size as John lofegren and mr. Lou(E to D). The skoob is -1 size and -1width, it makes me more referring to whites. I am ok fit in mr. lou 9E and also fit on white's nomad 8D. does that happen to you the same or similar like this? Thank you for your reply mate. I share the same taste of your boots collections. very great.
@@jtang5210 That’s what works for me. I’m White’s I go with 10.5E and can do 11E 55 or 67 last. For the Wesco MP1339 (Mister Lou) I do tts 11.5E, and for the MP95 can do 11D. For Lofgren engineers I do tts again 11.5D with a thin insert because the instep is pretty high, I can fit into the 11D but the toes are a bit crowded. For Zerrows, the 11E fits perfect. The Role Club engineers are 29.5E and the best fit of all my pull ons. And Skoob, I like the 10.5D for the engineer and the m-43. The Skoobs are the most narrow of these but fit well.