@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi Did you meant by Indian philosophy of upanishad and darshan because they are also finding answer and not stating they are correct and even there are multiple Shlok which say every one is invited to challenge it and give a new reasoning.Dont you think science student should also seek for Philosophical knowledge and then make claims.Because if a metaphysics or philosophical person claims science he is called pseudo should this be applied on science too. And let be clear sir all of us have a similar goal to achieve the true reality so shouldn't science also take help and co relate with Philosophy instead of having unnecessary pride. We have examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER and ALBERT EINSTEIN who have understood this and took inspiration and help from ancient philosophy like sankhya and vedant and Upanishads. Yes these texts don't formalize it but still can give relevant hypotheses and theory on which we can work as an initial stage. For example we are still working on dark matter as it came from a reliable source so there is a belief system in science too and where this belief system of science goes when Upanishads and darshan enters by these RUclipsrs. Shouldn't they study the darshan and Upanishads and make a conclusion. And if you say that I am a science person and do not believe in philosophy then you are ignorant because you have checked all the research papers but haven't taken a look at Upanishads or darshan. As an example I don't think Erwin scrodinger and Albert Einstein were foolish to take an initial step by ancient philosophy.So shouldn't science youtuber like you and other who are debunking should also have Upanishads knowledge if not for debunking but for understanding because this was sourced and inspiration for ALBERT EINSTEIN who took help from Upanishads which helped him to visualise and create a hypothesis and then formalize it so we can have philosophy in methadalogy of science
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi Did you meant by Indian philosophy of upanishad and darshan because they are also finding answer and not stating they are correct and even there are multiple Shlok which say every one is invited to challenge it and give a new reasoning.Dont you think science student should also seek for Philosophical knowledge and then make claims.Because if a metaphysics or philosophical person claims science he is called pseudo should this be applied on science too. And let be clear sir all of us have a similar goal to achieve the true reality so shouldn't science also take help and co relate with Philosophy instead of having unnecessary pride. We have examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER and ALBERT EINSTEIN who have understood this and took inspiration and help from ancient philosophy like sankhya and vedant and Upanishads. Yes these texts don't formalize it but still can give relevant hypotheses and theory on which we can work as an initial stage. For example we are still working on dark matter as it came from a reliable source so there is a belief system in science too and where this belief system of science goes when Upanishads and darshan enters by these RUclipsrs. Shouldn't they study the darshan and Upanishads and make a conclusion. And if you say that I am a science person and do not believe in philosophy then you are ignorant because you have checked all the research papers but haven't taken a look at Upanishads or darshan. As an example I don't think Erwin scrodinger and Albert Einstein were foolish to take an initial step by ancient philosophy.So shouldn't science youtuber like you and other who are debunking should also have Upanishads knowledge if not for debunking but for understanding because this was sourced and inspiration for ALBERT EINSTEIN who took help from Upanishads which helped him to visualise and create a hypothesis and then formalize it so we can have philosophy in methadalogy of science
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi Did you meant by Indian philosophy of upanishad and darshan because they are also finding answer and not stating they are correct and even there are multiple Shlok which say every one is invited to challenge it and give a new reasoning.Dont you think science student should also seek for Philosophical knowledge and then make claims.Because if a metaphysics or philosophical person claims science he is called pseudo should this be applied on science too. And let be clear sir all of us have a similar goal to achieve the true reality so shouldn't science also take help and co relate with Philosophy instead of having unnecessary pride. We have examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER and ALBERT EINSTEIN who have understood this and took inspiration and help from ancient philosophy like sankhya and vedant and Upanishads. Yes these texts don't formalize it but still can give relevant hypotheses and theory on which we can work as an initial stage. For example we are still working on dark matter as it came from a reliable source so there is a belief system in science too and where this belief system of science goes when Upanishads and darshan enters by these RUclipsrs. Shouldn't they study the darshan and Upanishads and make a conclusion. And if you say that I am a science person and do not believe in philosophy then you are ignorant because you have checked all the research papers but haven't taken a look at Upanishads or darshan. As an example I don't think Erwin scrodinger and Albert Einstein were foolish to take an initial step by ancient philosophy.So shouldn't science youtuber like you and other who are debunking should also have Upanishads knowledge if not for debunking but for understanding because this was sourced and inspiration for ALBERT EINSTEIN who took help from Upanishads which helped him to visualise and create a hypothesis and then formalize it so we can have philosophy in methadalogy of science
Here comes your blunder religion doesn't mean dharma and Hinduism is dharma where our Upanishads and darshan are not believing but stating there views by continuous improvement via thinking. They clearly say if you find any error just challenge it have debate and publish your work. For example:- Advait vedant challenged by dwait vedant and it was challenged by vishista adwait vedant.
@@Darshanik-ved that's just debate between philosophers. & Happened in other religions too. Dharma means Duty & also means religion as per context. All religions come with some duties so that doesn't differ anything between Hindudharm with any other.
@@a-youtube-user This means you are ignorant . how many darshan or Upanishads you have read brother I bet zero because if you have read it you will know. All abrahamic religions have belief systems that in every situation there is just one rule to follow god. But Vedic philosophy clearly says dharma keeps on changing with different situations and it is created by man for every situation. And we have great examples like during reformation when various scientists like Galileo gave his theory on the solar system and earth he was literally executed and same is with islam you can't question the authority of quran. But in Vedic philosophy they are inviting you to question then in SHASTRA ARTH to form an improved theory and I have already given an example of vedant. That advait vedant was challenged by various rishis and no one was killed
@@a-youtube-user This means you are ignorant . how many darshan or Upanishads you have read brother I bet zero because if you have read it you will know. All abrahamic religions have belief systems that in every situation there is just one rule to follow god. But Vedic philosophy clearly says dharma keeps on changing with different situations and it is created by man for every situation. And we have great examples like during reformation when various scientists like Galileo gave his theory on the solar system and earth he was literally executed and the same is with islam you can't question the authority of the Quran. But in Vedic philosophy they are inviting you to question then in SHASTRA ARTH to form an improved theory and I have already given an example of vedant. That advait vedant was challenged by various rishis and no one was killed. And give me any rigid duty of Hinduism we have Mahabharata were we have example that bhism was followed dharma of offering himself to King but not followed the reasoning and not changed his dharma according to situation so krishna had declared him Bhism should leave his king and take the side of dharma. So dharma is not rigid and always changing but other religions are rigid and non changeable
Bro Yaha kisi ko science and logic Mai interest nahi sab Manyata kee bhakt hai kise nae jo bhi kaha toh believe kar liya I’m really happy that you spread real and authentic information.❤
As a philosophy major student i say, science has its methodology ( experiment and research) same like metaphysics has it methodology ( analytical, logical and argumentative way discussion) Metaphysics discuss about unphysical things that we can't see through normal eye like God, Spirits etc.
Uske to asar najar nahi aa rahen hai! Universities me Yoga, Meditation, Astrology, Bhagwad Geeta jaise bakwas forcibly padhae ja rahen hai, ISCKON wale Aaj kaal giddh ki tarah University College ke hi ass pass mandra rahen hain,kya ganta Scientific Temper increase hoga?
Can't wait for more videos like this, let's show these people that science is study of surroundings and it includes questioning everything and yes , EVERYTHING. Its true that logic is also limited but why not use it wherever necessary!!!
Brother i have to ask one thing that he is just checking parallel thing between science and philosophy of upanishad ot darshans so when he says quantum physics in sankhya drashan he is just showing the laws of quantum physics and sankhya darshan are eventually talking on same conclusion yes conclusion may there subject are different he is not claiming that quantum physics is formulazied in sankhya darshan but the conclusion of quantum physics and sankhya darshan are same. What do you think of my reply 🤔
For example. Quantum physics says duality exists in a particular condition. Same thing sankhya says that there is a duality of consciousness that is the prakrit(our observable reality) and purush(the ultimate reality or conciousness)
Sankhya is philosophy and Quantum physics is not, it is a working model based on our observations and data available currently. Also, Quantum physics is not a single theory/model, it is a set of theories. The duality in sankhya darshan or the Greek philosophy, has nothing to do with duality of physics. Duality of sankhya pertains to the duality between consciousness and matter. It states that consciousness "Purush" and matter "Prakriti" are distinct from one another (unlike what non dualism states) Duality in quantum physics is wave-particle duality, where a quantum entities exhibit both particle and wave properties. As you can see, trying to find quantum physics in sankhya or any other iron age philosophy is "pseudoscience".
@@Darshanik-vedbro you are disgracing the Sankhya 😮💨 Edit: Duality in science means the dual nature of particles. Duality in philosophy (as far I know) means distinction of subject and object.
I have already said that I am not talking about the subject because both have different subjects but I am talking about the ultimate conclusion I am not saying duality of consciousness is duality of particle. Instead I am saying both are talking about duality so we can take help of science or science can take help of philosophy to build up new THEORY. And this is no new ee have many examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER who have read vedant philosophy and applied on science to get a hypothesis of quantum physics existence obviously vedant don't have formula but it does have conclusion similar to science so that why Erwin scrodinger used it. Hope you understood my point
@@yourguyin2554 I have replied you above I think you mis took me I am not claiming quantum physics but vo relating two great things, quantum physics and sankhya. And let say I am wrong but Erwin scrodinger also used this methodology only to relate vedant philosophy with science to get an HYPOTHESIS and if it get prooved we have discovered a new thing and it's contribution is totally to science but vedant acted as an initial path
Yes, the texts written by Nomadic Heardsmen (who probably didn't even know how to write ) were better than the Years of Hardwork by the Scientists, lol
@@basantprasadsgarden8365 If Your only way to success is by insulting others then you are in the wrong channel... The admin who describes the whole video didn't even insult anyone at any point of time but the viewer🤡
@@aritraroy1238 was I even talking to you? Whatever. But, you agree that the Vedas were written by Nomadic Heardsmen ! Being a Heardsmen is just a lifestyle and occupation and if you think that being called a "Heardsmen" is an insult, that's the defect with your mentality. Ultimately, your Religion or I say Dhrama, teaches you to judge people as "Pure" and "Impure" based upon their Occupation!
Mujhe ek baat samajh nahi atee...Whatsapp University Topper...Dushro Ki discoveries,Inventions ko Apne Pitaji K Hage main kyo search karke Claim Karte hai humare Pitaji k Hage hueye main pehle se tha🤔Khud kyo kuch naya nahi dete🤔Khair mere jaise Scientific temperament ko follow karne balo ko liye to yeh Garbage hai😁
1. Kshitij bhai, aapne phir se minor errors ko pakda (in starting), 1916 ka 1915 karne se kisi ko koi pareshani nahi hoti, agar kuch pakda ho to weak interpretation of observer effect ya aisa kuch pakdo jo real public misinformation phelay. 2. Do anyone knows in which video comment of Vishal got deleted? If he gives clarification, we should listen it, hope he will response someway and not get delete.
That's why you should learn science, philosophy, metaphysics, etc from books, college, professors,reputed research study papers, etc not from any youtube videos. Many people watch youtube video, podcast, explainer video, etc and think that they have gain some knowledge.
@@SungoddRa ha manta ha iska Matlab ya ha ki jiska theory or formulao ko Lekar tum bhasa kar re ho woh kudd bhagwan ko manta ha or tum yaha bakwas kar re ho ki Bhgwan exist nahi karta
At 10:10 are kshitij bhai , smjho pehle, kya vo apne channel per science pada rha hai nhi , jo vo sare string theory ke type ko bataye , he is just saying ki string theory bhi ek theory hai jo hamare granthon se match krti hai , vo metaphysics ki bate krte hai , smjho bhai pehle, every theory in science is not proven , even the big bang, he just saying ki sting theory bhi hai , jo is chij se match hoti hai , isme kya pseudo scientific hai , pehle ye bataiye bhai , jaise main khu ki evolution , hamare vishnu ke dash avtaro se resmble krta hai ,iska matlab ye nhi ki karta hi hai. Thik waise agar koi theory hai, iska matlab vo proven nhi hai to vo psheudo scientific hai kya , it is just an assumption , and I am again saying that metaphysics is no psheudo science,
"Complete nonsense to put it bluntly. I think one should read the scriptures in an allegorical way not take it literally." Dr Venki Ramakrishnan, Nobel Laureate 🫡🫡
i am thinking about you and suddenly your video upload....you know what i am big fan of you bcoz the way your explaining it is very useful...try to upload weekly videos...thank you
Why didn't you include "naturalism and empiricism" in the definition of science? You left important assumptions. Naturalism and empiricism must be assumed to make science, science.
wait doesn't that mean string theory lacks observation so it isn't considered in real science, now i understand difference between theoretical physics and physics
@@JustForFun-yv6wl idk if it lacks observation so I can't say anything. But no theoretical physics isn't purely out of science because it will still be based on laws of physics we observe
Okay, Feynman Lecture's Third volume is a great start, Cohen's Trilogy is next. You can also read DJ Griffith's book for introduction. Sakurai's book is very popular among the circle too.
@@Mehalkumarhyperquest khud he andhbhakto ko appeal karke apne videos ke through pakhand he faila raha hai, just pseudo science and superstitious dogmas
Bhaiya, please give scientific commentary over Sandeep Maheshwari's latest video on his spirituality channel, in which he is trying to relate spirituality with Quantum Mechanics!
@semicolon6499 your definition of spirituality, "related to humans and the mind," makes it essential for spiritual seekers to study science. This is because humans are made of the same things that the "other world" is made of, And the study of "Other world" is science...
@@semicolon6499 Indeed! That is why I asked a person of science to comment on the spiritual video of Sandeep Maheshwari, in which he is claiming something, which is allegedly based on QM!
@@agniswar3thats what im pointing out and so is this video, the dude tries to justify anything through any means cherry picking facts, whilst ignoring his own community's claims that oppose it. You can find plenty of comment in that video where people are saying its not gotra daan, but somehow ignore it
@@user_n-k44 I agree to you. Each person has their own unique perspective on this subject. Some say it is tradition so follow it while others say it is outdated. For Vishal bhaiya since women generally leave their parental home to live with her in-laws after marriage, the Kanya gives away her gotra so it is not completely illogical.
❤❤ Love you Kshitij... Keep it up... We are with you... Learn a lot from your channel... I recommend it to many youngsters.... Ready to pay the monthly amount to watch your channel....❤❤❤
At 16:50 agar koi chij hamare yha pehle se di gyi hai or koi ise bta rha hai to scientific temperament kaise kharab hota hai , isse bs logon ko ye pata chal jata hai ki pehle ke log bhi scientific temprament ke hote the or shayad isis bat ka apko dukh hai
Ye nahi mayine rakhta ki pehle se kya diya hua hai mayine ye rakhta hai ki usko kaise jaana gaaya kya method follow Kiya Gaya hai ye nahi diya hai Aur aise diya bhi kya hai philosophies ke alawa
@@AmitChaturvedi-t5h tum log to speed of light, time dilation oor pata nahi kya kya nikal rakha hai sabdo ko Todd marorke . Orr ejo purana purana laga rakhe ho isska chod do bhai picha. Kitna purana hai tumhara granth?
@@HarshitB-nt1fm can you prove big bang, can you prove sting theory there are many more theory that seems like philosophical. So we should neglect it? No you people think that ki every thing is experimental , this is not the truth , first we assume that that there is a big bang that happened for forming universe , then we research on it , so philosophies are not useless , I was only telling that ki pehle ke log bhi scientific temperament ke hote the ,at the time science was developing , iska matlab ye nhi hai ki tab science thi hi nhi , thanks
Is tarike ke log pahle wale ki tarha hi hai . Jaise pahle ke log bina khoj bin ke bhukump kyu aa rhe hai bta dete the.. ki shesh naag ne sir hilaya hoga.. thik aise hi log aa gye hai bas science k lambe lambe term de ke sachai ko koso dur tak le jate hai.. Aise hi hamre Vishal ji hai.. ❤😂
Did you meant by Indian philosophy of upanishad and darshan because they are also finding answer and not stating they are correct and even there are multiple Shlok which say every one is invited to challenge it and give a new reasoning.Dont you think science student should also seek for Philosophical knowledge and then make claims.Because if a metaphysics or philosophical person claims science he is called pseudo should this be applied on science too. And let be clear sir all of us have a similar goal to achieve the true reality so shouldn't science also take help and co relate with Philosophy instead of having unnecessary pride. We have examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER and ALBERT EINSTEIN who have understood this and took inspiration and help from ancient philosophy like sankhya and vedant and Upanishads. Yes these texts don't formalize it but still can give relevant hypotheses and theory on which we can work as an initial stage. For example we are still working on dark matter as it came from a reliable source so there is a belief system in science too and where this belief system of science goes when Upanishads and darshan enters by these RUclipsrs. Shouldn't they study the darshan and Upanishads and make a conclusion. And if you say that I am a science person and do not believe in philosophy then you are ignorant because you have checked all the research papers but haven't taken a look at Upanishads or darshan. As an example I don't think Erwin scrodinger and Albert Einstein were foolish to take an initial step by ancient philosophy.So shouldn't science youtuber like you and other who are debunking should also have Upanishads knowledge if not for debunking but for understanding because this was sourced and inspiration for ALBERT EINSTEIN who took help from Upanishads which helped him to visualise and create a hypothesis and then formalize it so we can have philosophy in methadalogy of science
Science is not just limited to discoveries and inventions. It is not just limited to the field of academia and research. But, science also involves cultivating a scientifically strong empirical mindset. Science involves experimentation, observation and conclusion. Do not accept everything at face value. In the book 'The Grand Design', Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow have said on this issue like this way: “..Because gravity shapes space and time, it allows space-time to be locally stable but globally unstable. On the scale of the entire universe, the positive energy of the matter can be balanced by the negative gravitational energy, and so there is no restriction on the creation of whole universes. Because there is a law like gravity, 'the universe can and will create itself from nothing' in the manner described in chapter 6. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist…” The same issue of creation from nothing can also be seen from the scientific explanation of various online websites too. Let’s have a look from the explanation of an online website below: “..Many scientists assume that the universe came from nothing, which is an idea that can only be true in light of quantum theory. Ultimately, quantum fluctuations could allow a universe to spontaneously form from nothing. However, without a mathematical proof, the idea that the universe spontaneously popped into existence has no real substance. And therein was the problem. We didn’t have the math to support the “universe from nothing” hypothesis. This is where Dongshan, he and his team from the Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics (WIPM) comes in. 'They have managed to develop the first mathematical proof' that the big bang could have been the result of quantum fluctuations. 'The Wheeler-Dewitt equation and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle are at the heart of this new proof.'….”
He claimed that our ancestors know about genetic inbreeding thus they created Gotra system. This was the point I pledged to not watch his next videos. 😅
There is a difference between misinformation and Baal ki khal nikalna ..aap sirf baal ki khal nikal rahe hai ....theory of relativity batane me singns aur dates ki mistake kya Hui aapne toh unhe pura hi galat bata diya.... Ab uper maine 'signs' ki spelling galat likhi hai pr usse mai jhoot failane wala toh nhi ho jaunga na
@astrokshitij Brother, your content is very good and need of the hour. But that by reading Astro I thought you make content related to "Astrology". Please do something about channal name. It is misleading to many.
If HyperQuest wants to preach his religion then he can so but glorifying the religious nonsense with the help of science without any proof is not acceptable. People like him need to be exposed completely
Bahut Badhiya kam kar rhe hai aap aaj ke Vaigyanik yug me janme aur vigyan ka sahara le rhe log vigyan ko hi galat thahra rhe kai shayad yahi Kalyug hai😊 Kuchh jyada to nhi ho gya....😂
यार ये लोग भी अजीब है हनुमानजी ने जब पर्वत उठाया तो वो ध्रुव राठी बोल रहा था की वैज्ञानिक तौर पर ये संभव नहीं है तो वो धर्म मे विज्ञान को मिक्स कर रहा है और जब धार्मिक पुस्तक को कोई विज्ञान की द्रष्टी से जानना चाहता है तो तुम लोग बोलते हो धर्म और विज्ञान को अलग रखो तो लोग चाहते क्या है आज तक समज ने नहीं आया। मेरा सवाल इतना है धर्म और विज्ञान अलग अलग है तो फिर ये धार्मिक पुस्तकों को भी विज्ञान की द्रष्टी से क्यू देखते हो की एक व्यक्ति पहाड़ नहीं उठा सकता अगर धर्म और विज्ञान अलग अलग है तो रामायण और महाभारत के वैज्ञानिक प्रूफ क्यू मांगते हो???
Bilkul sahi hume science aur dharm ko alag rakhna chahiye aur use science k nazariye se nhi dekhna chahiye. Ramayan humen courage or friendship sikhati hai aur ye bhi batati hai ki agar ghar ka bhedi hath se nikal jaye to puri lanka lga sakta hai. Dhruv sayad Ramayan k historical hone k upar baat kr rha tha.
@@SungoddRa bilkul mein bhi yahi maanta hu ki ramayan kisne likhi?? aur kab likhi?? is baat se important ye hai ki ramayan se sikhne ko kya mila. lekin dhruv ne yahi bola tha video me वैज्ञानिक तौर पर ये संभव नहीं है iska saaf meaning yahi hai ki wo dharm aur vigyan ko mix kar raha tha dusri baat ramayan ke historical hone par usne alag vahiyat hi logic diya tha ki just because ramsetu real me exist karta hai iska matlab ye nahi ki ram bhi real me exist karte the. is logic se to tum har ek biography par sawal utha sakte ho for e.g. gandhiji ka janm porbandar me hua tha to aaj se 1000 saal gandhiji ki biography padhkar dhruv jaisa bolega ki just because porbandar real me exist karta hai iska matlab ye nahi ki gandhiji bhi real me exist karte the had to tab hui jab usne ramayan ko marvel ki kisi comic book pe based movie(spiderman) se compare kiya. matlab koi itna galat kaise ho sakta hai tum ramayan to kya koi bhi biography ko kisi fictional movie ke saath compare karoge koi bhi biography fictional hi lagegi
Religion is a well settled business which is lead by All religious leaders , Like brahmins and all , and Dharma is fucking shit which comes out of the human's This is the difference b/w Religion and Dharma .In Which you come from ?? Religion or Dharma ???🤓
Agar main apki har video ko bariki se dekhu to kam se kam 100 galtiyan nikalu jahan pr apne galti se 1 ki jagah 2 bol diya ho ya lemda ki jagah delta bol diya ho , or ap ise ek bda issue bna rhe ho , it is very simple
Thank you for pointing this out. Like everyone, I am also susceptible to errors. While I make every effort to cross-check everything I say, there is always the possibility of a mistake. However, the point here, for example, is regarding concepts like lambda. In physics, we take such things very seriously, and anyone engaged in effective science communication is expected to do the same. If I am ever found to commit such a fallacy, I will willingly accept it and take steps to correct it. I am human, and I can (and often will) be wrong. However, as long as we remain open to acknowledging our mistakes and improving upon them, I believe that is what truly matters.
Theories improve hote hain. Ache hote hain science ke vaje se. Purane theories ko pakadke log rote nahi hain. Konsa theory ekdam badal gaya hai, example please?
@@Indgaming108 Geocentrism is a religious idea. Not science 🤦🏽♂️... Scientists were killed when they proposed heliocentrism with empirical observable evidence.
Itni pseudoscience hai hyperquest ki jabki ye khud ek IITian hain. Jabki metaphysics is no longer a branch of science rather a branch of philosophy, why r they still calling it as a branch of science
I agree that metaphysics is philosophy then , what's wrong with it , he is just co relating science with philosophy, there is nothing wrong about it. That's how we progress, it is not like that ki jab tum khali science hi padoge tabhi tarakki karoge , isme dhandha jaisa kya hai
He himself said that he is not teaching science rather he is teaching metaphysics and philosophy. And even though all the debates there are points where the two merges. So metaphysics is still somewhat relevant even to this day.
no one called metaphysics a part of science clown. philosophy lead to creation of science and all the subjects you see today. science is itself a philosophy of trying to reach the truth and understand the reality but clowns have destroyed the essence of science and have make it a circus where no free thinkers exist but just sheeps
@astrokshitij the misinformation part you mentioned will be more acceptable in context of govt job exam only, as years are most crucial there. But If the message was true regardless of the year mentioned, then it will not be referred to as complete misinformation.
Science Ka Equipment use karne Bale Andbhakt....Apne Baap K Goo main Vigyan doondh rahe hai,Jo Vigyan Ko Explain kar rahe hai Unko Gali de rahe,Tera Papa to Bandar ko Suraj Khilane k sath Suraj per Hawan bhi karta tha
😂 Sanatan me bohot scientific elements hota hai because it is life style related And baki majhab and bohot saare science streams kuch specific thoughts ko mann kar chalta hai Science ka pehla proposition hi hai,, what is not directly observable that is not in existence So for this reason a big chunk of these scientists long time rejected schordinger model
Nice work! 👌 Science thrives on questions, not answers. One who claims to know all the answers, knows nothing at all.
Bhai waiting for more videos from you... but take care and keep us informed with your well made videos. 🥰♥️ They are nice
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi Did you meant by Indian philosophy of upanishad and darshan because they are also finding answer and not stating they are correct and even there are multiple Shlok which say every one is invited to challenge it and give a new reasoning.Dont you think science student should also seek for Philosophical knowledge and then make claims.Because if a metaphysics or philosophical person claims science he is called pseudo should this be applied on science too.
And let be clear sir all of us have a similar goal to achieve the true reality so shouldn't science also take help and co relate with Philosophy instead of having unnecessary pride.
We have examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER and ALBERT EINSTEIN who have understood this and took inspiration and help from ancient philosophy like sankhya and vedant and Upanishads. Yes these texts don't formalize it but still can give relevant hypotheses and theory on which we can work as an initial stage.
For example we are still working on dark matter as it came from a reliable source so there is a belief system in science too and where this belief system of science goes when Upanishads and darshan enters by these RUclipsrs. Shouldn't they study the darshan and Upanishads and make a conclusion.
And if you say that I am a science person and do not believe in philosophy then you are ignorant because you have checked all the research papers but haven't taken a look at Upanishads or darshan.
As an example I don't think Erwin scrodinger and Albert Einstein were foolish to take an initial step by ancient philosophy.So shouldn't science youtuber like you and other who are debunking should also have Upanishads knowledge if not for debunking but for understanding because this was sourced and inspiration for ALBERT EINSTEIN who took help from Upanishads which helped him to visualise and create a hypothesis and then formalize it so we can have philosophy in methadalogy of science
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi Did you meant by Indian philosophy of upanishad and darshan because they are also finding answer and not stating they are correct and even there are multiple Shlok which say every one is invited to challenge it and give a new reasoning.Dont you think science student should also seek for Philosophical knowledge and then make claims.Because if a metaphysics or philosophical person claims science he is called pseudo should this be applied on science too.
And let be clear sir all of us have a similar goal to achieve the true reality so shouldn't science also take help and co relate with Philosophy instead of having unnecessary pride.
We have examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER and ALBERT EINSTEIN who have understood this and took inspiration and help from ancient philosophy like sankhya and vedant and Upanishads. Yes these texts don't formalize it but still can give relevant hypotheses and theory on which we can work as an initial stage.
For example we are still working on dark matter as it came from a reliable source so there is a belief system in science too and where this belief system of science goes when Upanishads and darshan enters by these RUclipsrs. Shouldn't they study the darshan and Upanishads and make a conclusion.
And if you say that I am a science person and do not believe in philosophy then you are ignorant because you have checked all the research papers but haven't taken a look at Upanishads or darshan.
As an example I don't think Erwin scrodinger and Albert Einstein were foolish to take an initial step by ancient philosophy.So shouldn't science youtuber like you and other who are debunking should also have Upanishads knowledge if not for debunking but for understanding because this was sourced and inspiration for ALBERT EINSTEIN who took help from Upanishads which helped him to visualise and create a hypothesis and then formalize it so we can have philosophy in methadalogy of science
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi Did you meant by Indian philosophy of upanishad and darshan because they are also finding answer and not stating they are correct and even there are multiple Shlok which say every one is invited to challenge it and give a new reasoning.Dont you think science student should also seek for Philosophical knowledge and then make claims.Because if a metaphysics or philosophical person claims science he is called pseudo should this be applied on science too.
And let be clear sir all of us have a similar goal to achieve the true reality so shouldn't science also take help and co relate with Philosophy instead of having unnecessary pride.
We have examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER and ALBERT EINSTEIN who have understood this and took inspiration and help from ancient philosophy like sankhya and vedant and Upanishads. Yes these texts don't formalize it but still can give relevant hypotheses and theory on which we can work as an initial stage.
For example we are still working on dark matter as it came from a reliable source so there is a belief system in science too and where this belief system of science goes when Upanishads and darshan enters by these RUclipsrs. Shouldn't they study the darshan and Upanishads and make a conclusion.
And if you say that I am a science person and do not believe in philosophy then you are ignorant because you have checked all the research papers but haven't taken a look at Upanishads or darshan.
As an example I don't think Erwin scrodinger and Albert Einstein were foolish to take an initial step by ancient philosophy.So shouldn't science youtuber like you and other who are debunking should also have Upanishads knowledge if not for debunking but for understanding because this was sourced and inspiration for ALBERT EINSTEIN who took help from Upanishads which helped him to visualise and create a hypothesis and then formalize it so we can have philosophy in methadalogy of science
Yes sir waiting for your videos...
"Religion is where you follow everything. Science is where you challenge everything."
~A.S Rana
Badmoshi🕺🏻
Here comes your blunder religion doesn't mean dharma and Hinduism is dharma where our Upanishads and darshan are not believing but stating there views by continuous improvement via thinking. They clearly say if you find any error just challenge it have debate and publish your work.
For example:-
Advait vedant challenged by dwait vedant and it was challenged by vishista adwait vedant.
@@Darshanik-ved that's just debate between philosophers. & Happened in other religions too.
Dharma means Duty & also means religion as per context.
All religions come with some duties so that doesn't differ anything between Hindudharm with any other.
@@a-youtube-user This means you are ignorant . how many darshan or Upanishads you have read brother I bet zero because if you have read it you will know.
All abrahamic religions have belief systems that in every situation there is just one rule to follow god.
But Vedic philosophy clearly says dharma keeps on changing with different situations and it is created by man for every situation.
And we have great examples like during reformation when various scientists like Galileo gave his theory on the solar system and earth he was literally executed and same is with islam you can't question the authority of quran.
But in Vedic philosophy they are inviting you to question then in SHASTRA ARTH to form an improved theory and I have already given an example of vedant.
That advait vedant was challenged by various rishis and no one was killed
@@a-youtube-user This means you are ignorant . how many darshan or Upanishads you have read brother I bet zero because if you have read it you will know.
All abrahamic religions have belief systems that in every situation there is just one rule to follow god.
But Vedic philosophy clearly says dharma keeps on changing with different situations and it is created by man for every situation.
And we have great examples like during reformation when various scientists like Galileo gave his theory on the solar system and earth he was literally executed and the same is with islam you can't question the authority of the Quran.
But in Vedic philosophy they are inviting you to question then in SHASTRA ARTH to form an improved theory and I have already given an example of vedant.
That advait vedant was challenged by various rishis and no one was killed.
And give me any rigid duty of Hinduism we have Mahabharata were we have example that bhism was followed dharma of offering himself to King but not followed the reasoning and not changed his dharma according to situation so krishna had declared him Bhism should leave his king and take the side of dharma.
So dharma is not rigid and always changing but other religions are rigid and non changeable
Pseudo metaphysician new term in the town ✨️
😂😂
😂
Lmao
i was also wondering abt it
I have studied philosophy a lot and I get dissatisfied seeing people use metaphysics like this
That’s true
Beliefs, doctrines, sermons do not make religion. It is realisation, perception of God which alone is religion.
-SWAMI VIVEKANANDA
Good
Source?
@@B-ni1xo Book name?
@@Advait_AshwaniPRACTICAL VEDANTA by SWAMI VIVEKANANDA.
@@Advait_AshwaniPRACTICAL VEDANTA BY SWAMI VIVEKANANDA
Bro Yaha kisi ko science and logic Mai interest nahi sab Manyata kee bhakt hai kise nae jo bhi kaha toh believe kar liya I’m really happy that you spread real and authentic information.❤
As a philosophy major student i say, science has its methodology ( experiment and research) same like metaphysics has it methodology ( analytical, logical and argumentative way discussion)
Metaphysics discuss about unphysical things that we can't see through normal eye like God, Spirits etc.
That's a great perspective. Thanks for sharing!
India mai scientific temperament increase karna hoga.
1st of all improve your education system then think of anything else
@wisdoomwaves4u bas ek rationality subject add karde kam ban jaega.
Uske to asar najar nahi aa rahen hai!
Universities me Yoga, Meditation, Astrology, Bhagwad Geeta jaise bakwas forcibly padhae ja rahen hai, ISCKON wale Aaj kaal giddh ki tarah University College ke hi ass pass mandra rahen hain,kya ganta Scientific Temper increase hoga?
@@basantprasadsgarden8365 hojaega bhai. Ab internet hai jo log ye sab chutiyappa pardhenge vo ghar aake youtube pe usko debunk hote dekhnge
Originally ya he sci ha beta 😂i@@basantprasadsgarden8365
Love watching kshitij growth These days ✨📈
Can't wait for more videos like this, let's show these people that science is study of surroundings and it includes questioning everything and yes , EVERYTHING.
Its true that logic is also limited but why not use it wherever necessary!!!
Brother i have to ask one thing that he is just checking parallel thing between science and philosophy of upanishad ot darshans so when he says quantum physics in sankhya drashan he is just showing the laws of quantum physics and sankhya darshan are eventually talking on same conclusion yes conclusion may there subject are different he is not claiming that quantum physics is formulazied in sankhya darshan but the conclusion of quantum physics and sankhya darshan are same.
What do you think of my reply 🤔
For example.
Quantum physics says duality exists in a particular condition.
Same thing sankhya says that there is a duality of consciousness that is the prakrit(our observable reality) and purush(the ultimate reality or conciousness)
Sankhya is philosophy and Quantum physics is not, it is a working model based on our observations and data available currently.
Also, Quantum physics is not a single theory/model, it is a set of theories.
The duality in sankhya darshan or the Greek philosophy, has nothing to do with duality of physics.
Duality of sankhya pertains to the duality between consciousness and matter. It states that consciousness "Purush" and matter "Prakriti" are distinct from one another (unlike what non dualism states)
Duality in quantum physics is wave-particle duality, where a quantum entities exhibit both particle and wave properties.
As you can see, trying to find quantum physics in sankhya or any other iron age philosophy is "pseudoscience".
@@Darshanik-vedbro you are disgracing the Sankhya 😮💨
Edit:
Duality in science means the dual nature of particles.
Duality in philosophy (as far I know) means distinction of subject and object.
I have already said that I am not talking about the subject because both have different subjects but I am talking about the ultimate conclusion I am not saying duality of consciousness is duality of particle.
Instead I am saying both are talking about duality so we can take help of science or science can take help of philosophy to build up new THEORY.
And this is no new ee have many examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER who have read vedant philosophy and applied on science to get a hypothesis of quantum physics existence obviously vedant don't have formula but it does have conclusion similar to science so that why Erwin scrodinger used it.
Hope you understood my point
@@yourguyin2554 I have replied you above I think you mis took me I am not claiming quantum physics but vo relating two great things, quantum physics and sankhya.
And let say I am wrong but Erwin scrodinger also used this methodology only to relate vedant philosophy with science to get an HYPOTHESIS and if it get prooved we have discovered a new thing and it's contribution is totally to science but vedant acted as an initial path
Great work bro
Ved DICKKKKKKKK Physic✅Metaphysics ❎
Sabas bhai aise hi tumhe success milega.... Sahi raha par ja rahe ho tum ...❤❤
😂😂
Yes, the texts written by Nomadic Heardsmen (who probably didn't even know how to write ) were better than the Years of Hardwork by the Scientists, lol
@@basantprasadsgarden8365 If Your only way to success is by insulting others then you are in the wrong channel... The admin who describes the whole video didn't even insult anyone at any point of time but the viewer🤡
@@aritraroy1238 was I even talking to you? Whatever.
But, you agree that the Vedas were written by Nomadic Heardsmen ! Being a Heardsmen is just a lifestyle and occupation and if you think that being called a "Heardsmen" is an insult, that's the defect with your mentality.
Ultimately, your Religion or I say Dhrama, teaches you to judge people as "Pure" and "Impure" based upon their Occupation!
Sir ap andho ke sehar me chasma bech rahe ho😢
Agr aisa hota hai o tm ye comments nhi kr rahe hote .. change aa raha h
@@imranmuhammad7321tum log bhi padhte ho kya science 🔭
Mujhe ek baat samajh nahi atee...Whatsapp University Topper...Dushro Ki discoveries,Inventions ko Apne Pitaji K Hage main kyo search karke Claim Karte hai humare Pitaji k Hage hueye main pehle se tha🤔Khud kyo kuch naya nahi dete🤔Khair mere jaise Scientific temperament ko follow karne balo ko liye to yeh Garbage hai😁
1. Kshitij bhai, aapne phir se minor errors ko pakda (in starting), 1916 ka 1915 karne se kisi ko koi pareshani nahi hoti, agar kuch pakda ho to weak interpretation of observer effect ya aisa kuch pakdo jo real public misinformation phelay.
2. Do anyone knows in which video comment of Vishal got deleted? If he gives clarification, we should listen it, hope he will response someway and not get delete.
I think you are confused between disinformation and misinformation bro. Check it😊
@@aryangupta-t8o6z
mis = by intention
dis = without intention
Is this right?
@@tdj461 it's opposite bro
@@aryangupta-t8o6z Oh! How can I spread this big *misinformation* ? Sorry for that 😂
RUclipsRS INDIAN NEEDED ❤❤❤❤❤
That's why you should learn science, philosophy, metaphysics, etc from books, college, professors,reputed research study papers, etc not from any youtube videos. Many people watch youtube video, podcast, explainer video, etc and think that they have gain some knowledge.
You’re right, there’s no substitute for a good education.
A good education !!!...if don't know English, please don't use...😂😂😂@@astrokshitij
India me scientist ki jagah baba log famous hai 😂😂
Not only in India but everywhere. Dalai lama ya fit Pope ko he dekh lo.
@@SungoddRawoh scientist bhi Bhgwan ko he manta ha 😂
@@factsjano7178Mai nhi samjha bhai?
Bahut sare scientists bhagwan ko mante hai.
@@SungoddRa ha manta ha iska Matlab ya ha ki jiska theory or formulao ko Lekar tum bhasa kar re ho woh kudd bhagwan ko manta ha or tum yaha bakwas kar re ho ki Bhgwan exist nahi karta
@@factsjano7178 Maind kaha bola ki bhagwan exist nhi karta ?
Waise bahut se scientist bhagwan ko nhi mante.
At 10:10 are kshitij bhai , smjho pehle, kya vo apne channel per science pada rha hai nhi , jo vo sare string theory ke type ko bataye , he is just saying ki string theory bhi ek theory hai jo hamare granthon se match krti hai , vo metaphysics ki bate krte hai , smjho bhai pehle, every theory in science is not proven , even the big bang, he just saying ki sting theory bhi hai , jo is chij se match hoti hai , isme kya pseudo scientific hai , pehle ye bataiye bhai , jaise main khu ki evolution , hamare vishnu ke dash avtaro se resmble krta hai ,iska matlab ye nhi ki karta hi hai. Thik waise agar koi theory hai, iska matlab vo proven nhi hai to vo psheudo scientific hai kya , it is just an assumption , and I am again saying that metaphysics is no psheudo science,
Very good work ✅️👍
Thank you so much
well i think i might be dumb, i need to make myself much better so that i can understand what is misinformation rightaway or i'll fall for them
Get a job and then engage in this things
@@femiwayeksaap1069 Is getting job necessary for learning this thing, i don't think so
"Complete nonsense to put it bluntly. I think one should read the scriptures in an allegorical way not take it literally."
Dr Venki Ramakrishnan, Nobel Laureate 🫡🫡
Bahut badhiya video Kshitij bhai. ❤
Thank you so much 😊
i am thinking about you and suddenly your video upload....you know what i am big fan of you bcoz the way your explaining it is very useful...try to upload weekly videos...thank you
This channel deserves a shoutout!!!
Thanks
Excellent Work🙌
Thank sir😊
Why didn't you include "naturalism and empiricism" in the definition of science? You left important assumptions. Naturalism and empiricism must be assumed to make science, science.
wait doesn't that mean string theory lacks observation so it isn't considered in real science, now i understand difference between theoretical physics and physics
@@JustForFun-yv6wl idk if it lacks observation so I can't say anything. But no theoretical physics isn't purely out of science because it will still be based on laws of physics we observe
@@gamereviews7112K got it!
I am really fan of your videos I would suggest take a podcast with Hyperquest I want you see both What's your opinion🎉
India needs more and more education and developing environment
Why such things are not challenged in court
12:12 he initially often included pure scientific videos but later his channel became completely dedicated to philosophy.
Philosophy bhi nahin, ab to philosophy ka use karke kuchh bhi bole jata hai
@upamanyu.baishya But atleast uske wajha se ham upanishad ke barein mein to Jan rahe hein.
@upamanyu.baishya Haa. Hame bhi uski khamiyon kon nazar andaz nahi karna chahiye.
@@agniswar3 Upanishads Jaan na hai to khud parh lo. Dusro ka interpretation kyu sun rahe hai..khud padhke samjho
@upamanyu.baishya Khud parna bohut acha hei parantu sab kuch aapne aap se nahi samjha ja sakta. Ek ache sikshak ki bhi zaroorat hoti hein.
Sir , are you atheist? 😊
I subscribed You by seeing this video ❤
Please suggest some books on quantum mechanics 😊
ऋगवेदादिभाष्य भूमिका
@@quantasoul007😂😂
in search of schrodinger's cat 😺😺 by john gribbin
@@quantasoul007 Na bhai, voh to *वेद विज्ञान आलोक* ka kaam hai 😂
Okay, Feynman Lecture's Third volume is a great start, Cohen's Trilogy is next. You can also read DJ Griffith's book for introduction. Sakurai's book is very popular among the circle too.
Scientific lafda 🗿😂
me watching your ring lights from your specs😅😅😅
😂
After hyperquest one video everyone is thinking that they can get view by creating a controversy 😂😂😂😂😂
Hyperquest himself earns millions of views like an astrologer by fooling people
@@descendantofbharatbharatva7155 aree usnae khud kaha hae astrology pae usse bishwas nhi tha pakhand lagta hae 1 video mae bolo to link bhi bhej du
@@Mehalkumarhyperquest khud he andhbhakto ko appeal karke apne videos ke through pakhand he faila raha hai, just pseudo science and superstitious dogmas
Good video
Man , you are doing great
At least some science and factbased content
Baki sab toh yuhin kuch bhi science bol ke bech de rahe hai
Now I'm waiting for his comment ...😉😏
Le aagiya bol kiya karega tu😂
Bhaiya, please give scientific commentary over Sandeep Maheshwari's latest video on his spirituality channel, in which he is trying to relate spirituality with Quantum Mechanics!
Spirituality is related to humans or minds not the other world .
@semicolon6499
your definition of spirituality, "related to humans and the mind," makes it essential for spiritual seekers to study science. This is because humans are made of the same things that the "other world" is made of, And the study of "Other world" is science...
@CriticisedLoveGirl yes . Exactly every spiritual seeker needs to be scientific .
@@semicolon6499 Indeed! That is why I asked a person of science to comment on the spiritual video of Sandeep Maheshwari, in which he is claiming something, which is allegedly based on QM!
I am first one to comment omg. Btw i appreciate ur work kshitij. Ur efforts to debunk those pseudoscience is commendable
The dude called kanya daan scientific, he's capable of anything 😂
He said that it means the daan of her gotra and not in the sense of some property.
@@agniswar3thats what im pointing out and so is this video, the dude tries to justify anything through any means cherry picking facts, whilst ignoring his own community's claims that oppose it. You can find plenty of comment in that video where people are saying its not gotra daan, but somehow ignore it
@@user_n-k44 I agree to you. Each person has their own unique perspective on this subject. Some say it is tradition so follow it while others say it is outdated. For Vishal bhaiya since women generally leave their parental home to live with her in-laws after marriage, the Kanya gives away her gotra so it is not completely illogical.
So that's Scientific?
Good job...
Keep doing
Mind blowing difference between science and pseudoscience 💯
I am glad you like it
❤❤ Love you Kshitij... Keep it up... We are with you... Learn a lot from your channel... I recommend it to many youngsters.... Ready to pay the monthly amount to watch your channel....❤❤❤
Thanks a lot for your support. It means a lot to me.
Bhai physics ko begtar kaise kre
At 16:50 agar koi chij hamare yha pehle se di gyi hai or koi ise bta rha hai to scientific temperament kaise kharab hota hai , isse bs logon ko ye pata chal jata hai ki pehle ke log bhi scientific temprament ke hote the or shayad isis bat ka apko dukh hai
Ye nahi mayine rakhta ki pehle se kya diya hua hai mayine ye rakhta hai ki usko kaise jaana gaaya kya method follow Kiya Gaya hai ye nahi diya hai
Aur aise diya bhi kya hai philosophies ke alawa
Pehle se kitna pehle ?? Or kya scientific hai bhai? Kuch scientific nahi hai bhai sabdo ko Todd marorke koi bhi matlab bata doge kya!
@BiplabAditya-k6g koi example dedo fir main batata hu bhai kya janna hai apko
@@AmitChaturvedi-t5h tum log to speed of light, time dilation oor pata nahi kya kya nikal rakha hai sabdo ko Todd marorke . Orr ejo purana purana laga rakhe ho isska chod do bhai picha. Kitna purana hai tumhara granth?
@@HarshitB-nt1fm can you prove big bang, can you prove sting theory there are many more theory that seems like philosophical. So we should neglect it? No you people think that ki every thing is experimental , this is not the truth , first we assume that that there is a big bang that happened for forming universe , then we research on it , so philosophies are not useless , I was only telling that ki pehle ke log bhi scientific temperament ke hote the ,at the time science was developing , iska matlab ye nhi hai ki tab science thi hi nhi , thanks
a small correction: Metaphysicist not Metaphysician
It’s metaphysician, please google it
Dark matter,time travel ,time dilation sab vedon me already likha hua hai..
Science kuch nahi hai vedon k aaage
Jai shree 8gb ram
@kumalgasm
Rehne de bhai zada mt soch.
😂😂
आपको आचार्य प्रशांत को सुनना चाइए ।
I listen to him sometimes
@astrokshitij cool . आपको थोडा टाईम होगा तो देख ते तहीये उनको . 💯✌️
Fir bhi woh nhi manenge bro ...
Is tarike ke log pahle wale ki tarha hi hai . Jaise pahle ke log bina khoj bin ke bhukump kyu aa rhe hai bta dete the.. ki shesh naag ne sir hilaya hoga.. thik aise hi log aa gye hai bas science k lambe lambe term de ke sachai ko koso dur tak le jate hai..
Aise hi hamre Vishal ji hai.. ❤😂
bhai even i am against pseudoscience , but vishal bhai ka comment delete karna bhi galat hai
I never deleted any comment (never)
Sab controversy karne me hi Lage h
HyperGoo ✅🤡
Aise logon ne hamare Puri youth ko superstitious banaa Diya hai 🤬😡
Did you meant by Indian philosophy of upanishad and darshan because they are also finding answer and not stating they are correct and even there are multiple Shlok which say every one is invited to challenge it and give a new reasoning.Dont you think science student should also seek for Philosophical knowledge and then make claims.Because if a metaphysics or philosophical person claims science he is called pseudo should this be applied on science too.
And let be clear sir all of us have a similar goal to achieve the true reality so shouldn't science also take help and co relate with Philosophy instead of having unnecessary pride.
We have examples like ERWIN SCHRODINGER and ALBERT EINSTEIN who have understood this and took inspiration and help from ancient philosophy like sankhya and vedant and Upanishads. Yes these texts don't formalize it but still can give relevant hypotheses and theory on which we can work as an initial stage.
For example we are still working on dark matter as it came from a reliable source so there is a belief system in science too and where this belief system of science goes when Upanishads and darshan enters by these RUclipsrs. Shouldn't they study the darshan and Upanishads and make a conclusion.
And if you say that I am a science person and do not believe in philosophy then you are ignorant because you have checked all the research papers but haven't taken a look at Upanishads or darshan.
As an example I don't think Erwin scrodinger and Albert Einstein were foolish to take an initial step by ancient philosophy.So shouldn't science youtuber like you and other who are debunking should also have Upanishads knowledge if not for debunking but for understanding because this was sourced and inspiration for ALBERT EINSTEIN who took help from Upanishads which helped him to visualise and create a hypothesis and then formalize it so we can have philosophy in methadalogy of science
Science is not just limited to discoveries and inventions.
It is not just limited to the field of academia and research.
But, science also involves cultivating a scientifically strong empirical mindset.
Science involves experimentation, observation and conclusion. Do not accept everything at face value.
In the book 'The Grand Design', Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow have said on this issue like this way:
“..Because gravity shapes space and time, it allows space-time to be locally stable but globally unstable. On the scale of the entire universe, the positive energy of the matter can be balanced by the negative gravitational energy, and so there is no restriction on the creation of whole universes.
Because there is a law like gravity, 'the universe can and will create itself from nothing' in the manner described in chapter 6. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist…” The same issue of creation from nothing can also be seen from the scientific explanation of various online websites too. Let’s have a look from the explanation of an online website below:
“..Many scientists assume that the universe came from nothing, which is an idea that can only be true in light of quantum theory. Ultimately, quantum fluctuations could allow a universe to spontaneously form from nothing. However, without a mathematical proof, the idea that the universe spontaneously popped into existence has no real substance. And therein was the problem. We didn’t have the math to support the “universe from nothing” hypothesis.
This is where Dongshan, he and his team from the Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics (WIPM) comes in.
'They have managed to develop the first mathematical proof' that the big bang could have been the result of quantum fluctuations.
'The Wheeler-Dewitt equation and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle are at the heart of this new proof.'….”
He claimed that our ancestors know about genetic inbreeding thus they created Gotra system. This was the point I pledged to not watch his next videos.
😅
Good work🎉
Be rational⚛️❤
Nice video keep promoting rationality ❤❤❤
Thank you, I will
Lots of terminology, I am confused but try to understand.thanks for aware us
👍👍👍👍
वुडा छेद 62 के छेद छेदम छेद
क्या आप अपना संपर्क सूत्र दे सकते हैं
कुछ लोग बता रहें हैं कि ये ब्राह्मणवाद और अंबेडकर वाद के बीच सुपर मेशी वार है।
great great job bro
There is a difference between misinformation and Baal ki khal nikalna ..aap sirf baal ki khal nikal rahe hai ....theory of relativity batane me singns aur dates ki mistake kya Hui aapne toh unhe pura hi galat bata diya.... Ab uper maine 'signs' ki spelling galat likhi hai pr usse mai jhoot failane wala toh nhi ho jaunga na
Why you name your channal Astro? Does it mean Astrology?
Astrology itself a pseudoscience.
Astro stands for astrophysics
@astrokshitij Brother, your content is very good and need of the hour. But that by reading Astro I thought you make content related to "Astrology". Please do something about channal name. It is misleading to many.
@@Ajayadav1997Astro Means Space so if you don't know nobody cares
SUPER 💥💥💥💥
If HyperQuest wants to preach his religion then he can so but glorifying the religious nonsense with the help of science without any proof is not acceptable. People like him need to be exposed completely
Chinta mat karo dhire dhire sab ke mukh badhlenge .......🤞
🧡Hare krishna ✨⭐
Good expose everyone
Bahut Badhiya kam kar rhe hai aap aaj ke Vaigyanik yug me janme aur vigyan ka sahara le rhe log vigyan ko hi galat thahra rhe kai shayad yahi Kalyug hai😊
Kuchh jyada to nhi ho gya....😂
Dot. 4:45
Hair transplant karwaya kya aapne?
Agar karvata to hairline aur better rakhta na bhai 😂
@astrokshitij main 3 hafte phle ganja ho gya tha thand ho rhi h ab firse hone ka man nhi kr rha 🥲🥲hair loss Se pareshan h
यार ये लोग भी अजीब है
हनुमानजी ने जब पर्वत उठाया तो वो ध्रुव राठी बोल रहा था की वैज्ञानिक तौर पर ये संभव नहीं है तो वो धर्म मे विज्ञान को मिक्स कर रहा है
और जब धार्मिक पुस्तक को कोई विज्ञान की द्रष्टी से जानना चाहता है तो तुम लोग बोलते हो धर्म और विज्ञान को अलग रखो
तो लोग चाहते क्या है आज तक समज ने नहीं आया। मेरा सवाल इतना है धर्म और विज्ञान अलग अलग है तो फिर ये धार्मिक पुस्तकों को भी विज्ञान की द्रष्टी से क्यू देखते हो की एक व्यक्ति पहाड़ नहीं उठा सकता
अगर धर्म और विज्ञान अलग अलग है तो रामायण और महाभारत के वैज्ञानिक प्रूफ क्यू मांगते हो???
Bilkul sahi hume science aur dharm ko alag rakhna chahiye aur use science k nazariye se nhi dekhna chahiye. Ramayan humen courage or friendship sikhati hai aur ye bhi batati hai ki agar ghar ka bhedi hath se nikal jaye to puri lanka lga sakta hai.
Dhruv sayad Ramayan k historical hone k upar baat kr rha tha.
@@SungoddRa bilkul mein bhi yahi maanta hu ki ramayan kisne likhi?? aur kab likhi?? is baat se important ye hai ki ramayan se sikhne ko kya mila.
lekin dhruv ne yahi bola tha video me वैज्ञानिक तौर पर ये संभव नहीं है iska saaf meaning yahi hai ki wo dharm aur vigyan ko mix kar raha tha
dusri baat ramayan ke historical hone par usne alag vahiyat hi logic diya tha ki just because ramsetu real me exist karta hai iska matlab ye nahi ki ram bhi real me exist karte the.
is logic se to tum har ek biography par sawal utha sakte ho
for e.g. gandhiji ka janm porbandar me hua tha to aaj se 1000 saal gandhiji ki biography padhkar dhruv jaisa bolega ki just because porbandar real me exist karta hai iska matlab ye nahi ki gandhiji bhi real me exist karte the
had to tab hui jab usne ramayan ko marvel ki kisi comic book pe based movie(spiderman) se compare kiya. matlab koi itna galat kaise ho sakta hai tum ramayan to kya koi bhi biography ko kisi fictional movie ke saath compare karoge koi bhi biography fictional hi lagegi
Bro doesn't even know the difference between religion and dharma 💀
Religion is a well settled business which is lead by All religious leaders , Like brahmins and all , and Dharma is fucking shit which comes out of the human's This is the difference b/w Religion and Dharma .In Which you come from ?? Religion or Dharma ???🤓
Noooo sarr history and Itihasa diff sarr Dharm and religion diff sarrrrr😭😭Shut up bro.
@@SungoddRa there is a difference
Dharma is entirely different
I'm not even a hindu anymore
@huklo6331 How is it different?
Brave boy
Agar main apki har video ko bariki se dekhu to kam se kam 100 galtiyan nikalu jahan pr apne galti se 1 ki jagah 2 bol diya ho ya lemda ki jagah delta bol diya ho , or ap ise ek bda issue bna rhe ho , it is very simple
*lambda, also nikaliye galtiyan, kaun rok raha hai?
Thank you for pointing this out. Like everyone, I am also susceptible to errors. While I make every effort to cross-check everything I say, there is always the possibility of a mistake. However, the point here, for example, is regarding concepts like lambda. In physics, we take such things very seriously, and anyone engaged in effective science communication is expected to do the same.
If I am ever found to commit such a fallacy, I will willingly accept it and take steps to correct it. I am human, and I can (and often will) be wrong. However, as long as we remain open to acknowledging our mistakes and improving upon them, I believe that is what truly matters.
Jay shri ram❤❤
थ्योरी तो बदलती रहती है साइंस में तो कैसे रिलायबल हुआ, 😂😂
Theories improve hote hain. Ache hote hain science ke vaje se. Purane theories ko pakadke log rote nahi hain. Konsa theory ekdam badal gaya hai, example please?
@godlessparticle geocentric, etc
@@Indgaming108 Geocentrism is a religious idea. Not science 🤦🏽♂️... Scientists were killed when they proposed heliocentrism with empirical observable evidence.
@@godlessparticle please go and get some knowledge 😂
@@Indgaming108 you please stop basking in your ignorance 😭
Shi bola, ye science ke domain me ghuste hai, hame inke domain me ghusna padega
Kyu science tere maa ne pichware se nikali kya?😂 Aise bolrha h science iske baap ka h😂
Bhai ek kaam krr... Direct debate krr le. Lmfao!!
Itni pseudoscience hai hyperquest ki jabki ye khud ek IITian hain. Jabki metaphysics is no longer a branch of science rather a branch of philosophy, why r they still calling it as a branch of science
Dhandha chala rahe hain bhaai, unko pata hai aise religious appeasement karke jaldi famous hua jaa sakta hai.
I agree that metaphysics is philosophy then , what's wrong with it , he is just co relating science with philosophy, there is nothing wrong about it. That's how we progress, it is not like that ki jab tum khali science hi padoge tabhi tarakki karoge , isme dhandha jaisa kya hai
He himself said that he is not teaching science rather he is teaching metaphysics and philosophy. And even though all the debates there are points where the two merges. So metaphysics is still somewhat relevant even to this day.
no one called metaphysics a part of science clown. philosophy lead to creation of science and all the subjects you see today. science is itself a philosophy of trying to reach the truth and understand the reality but clowns have destroyed the essence of science and have make it a circus where no free thinkers exist but just sheeps
@@aishwarynigam605 achcha bhai jara batao to kya dhandha chal rha hai?
Latex 💀
Aap k taraf se kuch contribution kab ayega science mein kyun ki vishal se toh nehi hoga kuch as he is a pseudo science enthusiast.
Yes I am also working on something while it is related to dark matter I will try to make my contribution.
@astrokshitij the misinformation part you mentioned will be more acceptable in context of govt job exam only, as years are most crucial there. But If the message was true regardless of the year mentioned, then it will not be referred to as complete misinformation.
Vishal is big fool
❤
Can you derive one moral value using science!!?? Know the limits of science...
That what binds you from understanding value of morals it's easy you determind it's for your self
Yes, social cooperation. Which arises due to need for survival
@@acidiccritic5171,I am asking you guys to use science to derive moral values...
@@SteveOmnipotent, Survival of what!!??
@@achyuthcn2555yes for this we have branch of science called moral science 😺 u must have read uptil class 8
🇮🇳💙
super❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Thanks a lot!
❤️💯
कभी डिबेट में बुला लिया तो रोने मत लगाना जिस तरह से सनातन रिव्यूज ने रुलाया था
Science Ka Equipment use karne Bale Andbhakt....Apne Baap K Goo main Vigyan doondh rahe hai,Jo Vigyan Ko Explain kar rahe hai Unko Gali de rahe,Tera Papa to Bandar ko Suraj Khilane k sath Suraj per Hawan bhi karta tha
Haa usne to bahot bada research kar rakha tha
Apna dimag use kar dono ke response ko neutral hokr dekh ki kaun fallacies commit kr rha h
@@arv1536matlab
Astro kshitij is amazing
Am i first?
@@RimaDesu00 we dont know but it doesn't matter. All the things that really matter are what we learn from his videos.
Islam pe video bnao na 😊😊 hindu sabse bure h kya?
Bhai hindu Muslim ki to baat hi nhi thi 😂😊
@@Anoymous69.Ye log hamesha mil jate hai 😂
Bro hindu muslim kaha se aaya isme, it's about pseudoscience, aap galat channel pr aa gye ho 😊
@@abhijitsingh9571 haa magar wo hindu h which makes you hate him
Muslim log kab science dhundhe quran me?
@HyperQuest
😂 Sanatan me bohot scientific elements hota hai because it is life style related
And baki majhab and bohot saare science streams kuch specific thoughts ko mann kar chalta hai
Science ka pehla proposition hi hai,, what is not directly observable that is not in existence
So for this reason a big chunk of these scientists long time rejected schordinger model
Bhai jiske baare ma na pata ho voh bolna nahi chahiye