these judges have too much power. She sends him away for two weeks in jail because she did not like his attitude or what he said. It's sickening when you think about the other ramifications of her sentence. What about his job, loss of income,family while he is sent to jail for two weeks.....she does not care one bit and neither do the rest of people in the criminal justice system. As long as tyrants get their overpaid checks off the misery of others it's ok.
HE WAS TALKING OVER HER IN HER COURTROOM HER COURTROOM NOT HIS. I WOULD HAVE FOUND HIM IN CONTEMPT TOO YOU PEOPLE ARE ALL INSANE TO THINK UOU CAN WALK INTO A COUTROOM AND TALK OVER THE JUDGE. TO BAD SHE WASNT A MALE JUDGE CUZ HE WOULD HAVE BEEN JUST AS HARSH MAYBE MORE. AND IF YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT MISSING OUT ON WORK, CARETAKING A FAMILY OR WHATEVER CUZ YOURE IN JAIL DONT DISRESPECT Judges in their own courtrooms and learn the rules of court.
@@kendrakinard7580 SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT EXPOSE THE SCAM Clearfield Trust Co. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363 (1942) [APPENDIX A] In 1942 the Supreme Court made a decision that exposed the corporate government. It resulted in what is now called the Clearfield Doctrine. Summary of the Clearfield Doctrine As all of our government "entities" (listed on Dun and Bradstreet) are doing business using private commercial paper (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE), they have no more rights or privileges than any other corporation. Because of the private currency we are all forced to use called the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE, our so-called government has lost its sovereignty and has become no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations. Therefore, if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon their corporate statutes or rules, then they, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance is made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. Without the contract, enforcement cannot take place lawfully . . . unless you consent. Bond vs. UNITED STATES 529 US 334 (2000) [APPENDIX B] In 2000 the Supreme Court held that the American people are in fact sovereign and not the STATES or the government. The court went on to define that local state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful action against the sovereign people by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions. The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, state legislatures, city councils, municipalities and all state and federal courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government. All laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Since these government bodies are not sovereign, they cannot promulgate or enforce criminal laws. Corporate 'governments' can only create and enforce civil laws, which are bound to comply with the Law of Contracts.
@@sandragasman901you really missed the point . And I definitely am not gonna try and cut thru all your cognitive dissonance. In short , our courts have become tyrannical .
He never claimed to be a sovereign of his own country. That's a different movement. He was simply exercising his constitutional rights. But I agree with the host of this video that we should not be angry and aggressive towards people like you who disagree with us. I don't say to you "STFU". please feel free to speak your mind but also be willing to listen to reasoned discussion of the contrary.
Sorry, but in this instance I'm squarely behind the judge. He would have had the opportunity to air his grievances at the next hearing date by simply pleading not guilty.
Sorry Josh, but you sound like one of those "Social Justice Warriors" Judge was very tolerant and allowed the fellow to interrupt her numerous times. Are you aware Josh that the judge in the courtroom not only has ultimate authority, but if the President himself went into her courtroom, he could not over rule her, she would have authority over him.
The truth is , she can be overruled , that's why there are 3 branches of our government , to oversee each other . This just played out in a courtroom , they drug the judge out of court , tried and convicted her , then had to drag her off to jail , for 6 months . That's just the most recent in the judiciary shakeup happening lately , now Trump is in charge , many have resigned in shame .
@@mikeevans7560 Mike, yes there are the 3 branches of government and that is why one can not intrude on the other without due process. If the President enters the courtroom, he is subject to the head of the court. Just like if he comes before a house or Senate Committee to answer questions-now he may claim Executive Privilege but I'm not certain. For sure, there are a lot of judges who abuse their authority and I'm glad they are being exposed and removed from the bench. Interesting conversation Mike-have a good day.
You’re absolutely right. We need good people everywhere. Let’s expose all the crazy evil doers. This judge needs to be mentally evaluated. Take our power back! Hold evil doers accountable record and post all evil. Expose them!
We had a judge in Florida Florida that was a complete lunatic and sentenced a girl to jail because she was afraid to show up for a domestic violence case.... but I am happy to report she was actually reprimanded and eventually I believe she was thrown off the bench! Thank God because she was completely insane and hated women I worked in the court system in new all about her.
Imagine if Josh was her son, would she treated him like that and having him go to jail just because he doesn't listen to what she said. Probably not! But I wish her kids would have done the same thing to see how will she do to them. I can't believe that people can go to jail when they exercise theirs rights in court.
I am an attorney and I see absolutely nothing wrong with what the Judge did or said. He is in contempt of court. If he doesn't understand court procedure, he should retain counsel. There are rules of court for a reason and he is not, in any way, complying with those rules. He is refusing to answer the court's questions and not giving the court any indication he understands these proceedings.
I have sued 16 Judges in Texas (12 "STATE" and 4 Federal) in the last 14 months, after Judge Andrew Hathcock, and Judge Scott Jenkins, took away my children in court case #: D-1-FM-03-000048, in spite of me committing NO CRIMES, simply because I went public with the TRUE STORY of my black girlfriend (Jenna Lenee Jackson) being RAPED, and sadly tricked into getting an ABORTION, by a PIMP named: Vadik Marmer, who PROUDLY posted a video on Facebook titled: "HOW TO BRAINWASH GIRLS INTO THE BURNING MAN CULT", for the whole world to see. Isn't it funny that I had to file the suits against the Judges "Pro Se" because NO ATTORNEY WOULD HELP ME AS AN INDIGENT PERSON???
Look it up.....Jesus Christ. here ...chew on this. And then ask more stupid questions www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByArticle/Chapter_5A/Article_2.pdf
I’m interested- was this man actually guilty of driving without a valid drivers license? If so, he has broken the law. You don’t do something against the law then try and just talk your way out of it. It’s like the old saying goes. You want to do the crime, be prepared to do the time
Exactly the guy who made this video just wasted everyone's time and proven that he only has this stance is because she has brought a lot of negative attention to himself most likely in a courtroom like doing what you're not supposed to be doing and now he feels like this Warrior fighting for justice but in reality she's most likely one of those people who blame everyone else
Am I missing something? All I saw was a judge doing her job correctly. The time for questions has passed at this point, this is a plea hearing. Well done judge.
She was professional. This is a court. He can't go in there with his interpretation of the law amd do what he wants. This guy is a fool.. and so is the guy who posted it.
This guy was warned a few times. Besides that every one in the free world knows driving on a suspended liscence is a crime. Stop being some cry babies and man up when you get caught breaking the law
Darrell Kimberling She has a god mentality I agree that his suspended liscence is a crime and he should have sucked it up but she needs to be held to a higher standard. The way she acts like she physically owns that courtroom is ridiculous
@@naturaltranquillityaudioim1916 but this is America not the UK. we have rights that no one can take away from us . Like him legally asking questions about his own case. He was also representing himself so he needed to ask those questions. The judge was in the wrong
HoneyBadger MalDog. That court room is jers to run just like your house hold is yours to run. You wouldnt let me come in and talk to you anyway i felt and disrespect yiur home. That guy needed to just close his mouth and face the consequences of his actions.
Oh, so he thought that it was HIS courtroom, and she was in contempt. All I saw was his unbelievable arrogance talking over her. He’s lucky he only got 15 days.
Whether anyone thinks the judge is corrupt isn't my issue with what happened here. What I see is a citizen being charged with driving on a suspended license then telling a judge she is not in charge of her court room. Are you kidding me????? Last time I checked driving on a suspended license is an offense in any state.
Debra D amazing! You got to the heart of this and I bet you’re not even a lawyer. He deserves every second in custody he got and only himself to blame. These idiots always pull this and always end up in jail or prison.
You guys are both idiots keep bending over for the corrupted I don’t understand what’s wrong with standing up for our rights and to uphold the constitution.
@@madskillzgaming4465 That's right! These people are part of the problem, they've been brainwashed! They will bend over and take it up the arse without lube cuz someone told them its the law! They have no clue about their constitutional rights! When you don't use them, you lose them!
@@america1403 Getting your legal education from RUclips College is not a good idea. Anyone that thinks the moron presenting this video is anywhere near correct, is just asking to end up behind bars for the same reason. It is her court. She is the boss here. And it is Constitutional.
This is normal in Las Vegas and My story of what happened to me on multiple occasions, between the police and judges makes this look like nothing. It was bad enough for me to leave the US permanently. Good luck with your corrupt and unprofessional system.
The original question was "Are you guilty or Not guilty of driving without a licence". I don't like our legal system either but just because you want to try and bamboozle the judge with crap, does not make you a legal genius or a defender of civil rights.
Carlos Chevalier Chevalier Don't know what country you're talking about, but it sure as hell ain't the United States where this man was charged. You can't operate a motor vehicle on the road without a license, dumb ass. Suggest you do your own research, because you pull that shit with any cop and you're going to find your ass standing before a Judge too.
Do you need a license to drive a bicycle? Can you get a DUI on a bicycle? See by signing a drivers license you are bound by CONTRACT law, hence why you have to PAY aka consideration to get a license. Ever wonder why they are not free?
You can operate a motor vehicle without a licence if its not being used for a commercial activity, read the federal laws. Licences only hold water if you got one from the state in the first place and signed the contract for it(and made an exchange of money for said contract, aka fee for licence) read the laws and you will see this is a system used by the states to trap people into something that is essentially unconstitutional.
Mason Jones actually at 3:04 when Mr Martinez is brought back into court , the Judge clearly states that Mr Martinez said he was in charge of court and she was in contempt then again at 3:46 at this point Mr Martinez does not challenge the Judge ???
DontTreadOnMeXXX i know i think he just wasnt trying to keep instigating the situation the judge was obviously making it personal and forgot about the law
I ABSOLUTELY concur with the judge. The poster of this video (Josh) represents a demographic of scofflaws in this country that has little to no respect for the rule of law. I wish I were a judge and he (Josh) comes before me. I would throw the book of him.
Damn straight and a woman will abuse authority and exercise great disrespect towards a man when given such a position... Those sworn by the "Oath" to uphold the Law spit in the face of it and the "Constitution," this is why God clearly states the following as in the KJV: (1) A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. (2) I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. (3) For Adam was formed first, then Eve. (4) And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.
She was a five star judge. Her actions had nothing to do with worshipping her. He showed total lack of respect for the court. She could've gave him 30 days.
@@statinskill I can understand your point of view but there's a right and a wrong way of conducting yourself. Our system of justice definitely has its problems.
@@michaelmcintosh5818 -- Yes, but we are now at the point where we need to purge and liquidate to fix * any * sort of institution, not just the courts. Don't let that put you off, these things happen regularly and are important for the health of the political body. Just think what would have happened in Chile, if Allende and his cronies had been permitted to carry out their filthy work. Or what would have happened in Indonesia if they had not destroyed millions of leftists in 1965.
Driving is a privilege and not a right so why waste the courts time with bullshit. Maybe he should get a valid permit for that privilege instead of ranting about victims.
It was a driving charge. He could stop driving but since it is considered a priveledge, the injured party doesn’t apply. Should people be allowed to drive totally drunk and put everyone at risk if no one calls the cops on them? Sometimes common sense needs to be used
This was not the trial. All he had to say was not guilty and then say what's needs to be said at trial. He would have not got locked up. At trial is when you do all the talking. Or ask for dismissal instead of trying to get somewhere when that was not the time to do it
Yeah that SOUNDS good, but that is not the way it really works is it? Just say what needs to be said at trial right? That is part of the scam. I have had more than my share or experience dealing with the legal system, far more than I care to admit. Most people do not have the time to show up to court for an arraignment, then show up for continuance after continuance, missing day after day of work, to finally get to defend themselves. The system is set up like that so you just pay the fine and they get their money.
@@TracyGunz Really? Because it looks like he is defending himself and has a public defender seated next to him..Just saying..ya know the old saying about a person who defends himself has a fool for a client? yeah pretty much. Poor guy didn't stand a chance.
@@axlef1513 Wrong, that is how it works. If you want to claim the protection of our Constitution then you also have to accept the responsibilities of that Constitution. That includes the part where the courts get to decide the law and settle disputes between citizens and between citizens and their government. You do not get to cherry pick only the parts you like. Remember, if you do not like our social order then no one is preventing you from leaving. I understand Somalia has lots of beach front property available with no taxes or gun laws. They also don't have any courts or police. Or government, unless you consider the warlord with the most guns the government.
I’m usually the first one to stand up and point a finger at corrupt or fascist leaning officials. But his comment challenging the judges authority was quite simply counter productive to his own line of questions. You can tell cops on the street they are working for you all day but you can’t step into a damn court and expect to argue semantics with the judge! And this is coming from someone who HATES admitting when police or judges are in the right.
EvenStar LoveAnanda . Iv red the constitution so what does that have to do with both the commentator and the defendant being a clown .the guy was clearly in contempt of court . When your in a courtroom there is only one person in charge that's the judge .
H.O FL350 WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She was denying him do process so the judge lost jurisdiction over him. And he took control of the court room. You are a dumb ass and you don't understand how the law works. The guy did everything right, but the judge is corrupt. You Americans are your own worst enemy. You always argue against your own rights and best interest. And you have no idea what you have inherited from your founding fathers. Shame on you ALL.
EvenStar loveAnanda . Please tell me your not a sovereign citizen nut . Iv dealt with a few and the one thing Iv learned was not to wast my time arguing with them . If you can't live by the laws move on . And why is it that most sovereign citizens have past criminal records and they try anything thing they can not to follow are laws . This will be my only time I respond to you no matter what you write so you have a great life and maybe will meet one day when your traveling down one of the roads I patrol . And will see how far you get with I'm not driveing I'm traveling so I don't need a drivers license . Take it easy .
This was not the judge's fault. I'm not really big on the 'system" but this was an arraignment where there is only one question: How do you plead? She immediately asked that question. At that point there are only two possible answers: Guilty, or not guilty. If he pleaded guilty, the case is over. If he pleaded NOT guilty, the trial can begin, he can request a trial by jury, and ask all the questions he wants. Instead, he chose a "third" option that does NOT exist -- an argument! He may as well have started to ask her why she drives a certain kind of car. Nothing else mattered at that time. He WAS in contempt. He was/is a trouble-maker. She might have explained the situation to him better and cited the fact that there are only two lawfully acceptable responses to "guilty or not guilty."
That is true but dose not apply in this case. We have had our rights stripped after 9/11 and that is what would apply, not a douchebag wanting to drive without a license or insurance.
First of all, it was Benjamin Franklin who made that statement. What he actually said: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” Second - he wasn’t talking about liberty in the context you are implying. It was in a letter to the Pennsylvania Governor from the Pennsylvania State Assembly regarding taxes on the Penn families land to raise money to defend the frontier during the French/Indian conflicts. Third - Franklin OWNED two slaves. Jefferson OWNED over 600. These are not the type of men that I look to when I need pointers on Liberty. Contextomy. Look it up.
No way, by the looks of things, she knew that the guy caught her for doing the wrong thing so she got him arrested just to feel better about it. That is really what happened!!
It's the judges courtroom.. that's why they're called a judge... Selected by our Congress.. truly the jury is in charge of a certain case but when you break the law, you get made an example of.. that's how it works. Stop whining and obey the law and there won't be a problem. Don't start no shit, won't be none.
Josh trying to show off in court and got his ass handed to him. Imagine your driving to the corner store and out of nowhere Josh hits you in his car. He has a suspended license, good luck getting insurance money from Josh. Now your in the hospital and paying out of pocket because this nit-wit thinks the laws and rules don't apply to him. Kinda wish the Judge gave him 30 days.
Its not her courtroom it belongs to the people that she is supposed to work for. I don't know why they think they deserve respect, they have done nothing to earn it.
Judge is doing well considering the perp is being a jerk. He’ll get attitude adjustment shortly. Furthermore this is why america is failing. Don’t drive without licence, and if you get caught, be a man not a punk and take your lumps. There was a good reason to put him in the clink.
I totally agree with you. Wow! He was just being an ass. I don't believe for a minute she wanted to b worshipped. I wholeheartedly believe she only wanted the respect that she deserves in that Court room.
If a man decides to take drug(s), risk his own body. Goverment steps in. You know why? You aint free, they own your sorry ass body. GET THAT? More then 50% of people in jail is non-violence drug addicts. They threat them as criminals, while it's obvious it's a mental health problem. This is the world we live in, this is what they call justice. They thought me to respect the police but how the fuck can I respect this shit? It's impossible. Yes, we need police.. No, they aint doing their job they are PISSING on us 24/7 and because we got ALOOOOT of braindead neighbors, they can do whatever the FUCK they want.
Oh I agree, Her court room is as fake as the paper gold she wants. If you aint learn to hate them mfr on paper your gunna get steamrolled. Believe me, i just slammed a state trooper with a public pretender who didnt do nothing but beg me to plea out. That mf'r can prononce death but couldnt tell the difference between a motorcycle + a air cooled clutchless scooter. Bet he wont try that bs again. I hate these young evangelical punks with a badge. Law is an idea, not reality
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT EXPOSE THE SCAM Clearfield Trust Co. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363 (1942) [APPENDIX A] In 1942 the Supreme Court made a decision that exposed the corporate government. It resulted in what is now called the Clearfield Doctrine. Summary of the Clearfield Doctrine As all of our government "entities" (listed on Dun and Bradstreet) are doing business using private commercial paper (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE), they have no more rights or privileges than any other corporation. Because of the private currency we are all forced to use called the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE, our so-called government has lost its sovereignty and has become no different than a mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations. Therefore, if they intend to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon their corporate statutes or rules, then they, like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance is made. And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. Without the contract, enforcement cannot take place lawfully . . . unless you consent. Bond vs. UNITED STATES 529 US 334 (2000) [APPENDIX B] In 2000 the Supreme Court held that the American people are in fact sovereign and not the STATES or the government. The court went on to define that local state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful action against the sovereign people by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions. The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, state legislatures, city councils, municipalities and all state and federal courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government. All laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Since these government bodies are not sovereign, they cannot promulgate or enforce criminal laws. Corporate 'governments' can only create and enforce civil laws, which are bound to comply with the Law of Contracts.
He asked completely legal questions until he actually said "we are in control of this court." At that point he stepped out of line. Stop trying to be a shock vlogger. He was in contempt of court and you are just spouting crap.
anonimous chicka... technically the people are in control of the courts as tax payers. Technically, judges work for us as appointed officers of court. Without taxes there'd be no judges.
You may not like it but it is the law. You don't talk over judge and if judge decides somebody is disrupting proceedings he/she is well within rights to restore the order by issuing fines and sometimes even jail time. This is very practical matter and has nothing to do with worshipping. There must be a written record of everything anybody said and it is impossible when people are talking over each other. Anybody would be able to drag any proceeding indefinitely if he/she was allowed to disrupt proceeding however they liked. Judge's role is to remind of the rules and enforce them when necessary. Within court room, there is nothing you can accomplish that you could not accomplish by answering questions, filing motions and generally proceeding within established process.
This is not a court of record idiot which is the point that this man was making. Not a court of record then not a court of law! Therefore the judge has NO JURISDICTION AND IS ACTING IN TREASON!
Minnesota case. I was ordered to Show cause why summary judgment should not be granted, per court order I came and presented evidence, in which judge refused to take and claimed that the court hearing is to show cause why I should not be found in the contempt. I said I do not understand what the judge attempting to order here, when clearly it states show cause why summary judgment should not be granted and that is the reason I am here to do so, due to the fact I have material evidence that shows I was defrauded, misrepresented. The judge said show cause is the same as show cause, contempt. I said that orders here are two different orders and should be void for vagueness and that I demand a fair trial. I was alleged with contempt of the court. Next morning Judge again demanded to comply with their order, in which I replied that he violated my civil and constitutional rights and without due process. I was sentenced for 180days/6 month, in which later released without an official hearing, no trial. Next day after I was released, I went to the court. I demanded this case to be tried by Jury and the judge confirmed and made a claim that Jury will be established. I was tricked into a bench trial. No jury was established. Still fighting this case as a pro se. Fighters of Rights. Men of God. Keep up the good fight against corruption, injustice, and servants of bad faith.
mike53153 Exactly, either you accept all the bullshit and take it like a man if you want to stay or live. The choice is yours, so stop crying like a baby 🤣🤣
U evidently believe that people should not b held accountable for their actions. Hooray 4 the judge doing what is necessary to keep the peace even in the court of law.
Umm.. i disagree. Under Corpus Juris Appendum under the subheading "Attorney & Client" it explains attorney's have a dual obligation, and their primary obligation is to the government, not their client. Legally if you hire an attorney you are, by law, a "client" to the court. Consequently a "client" is defined as a "ward of the court". When you look up "ward of the court" in blacks law dictionary it says "a ward of the court is an infant or a person of unsound mind" so by definition, if you hire an attorney, you're of unsound mind.. basically.. saying if you hire an attorney you're an idiot.
Yes it is absolutely OK for a judge to behave that way. You do not talk over the judge, you do not claim you are in charge of the courtroom, because you are not. He was rightfully sentenced for being in contempt of court. She gave him even the chance to apologize and avoid the sentence, but he was too stupid to do it.
Retired California lawyer, retired Oregon judge here. When I ask you for a plea during your arraignment, I expect to hear "guilty" or "not guilty" or "no contest" (I never got to hear "not guilty by reason of insanity.") I have the authority to enter a "not guilty" plea on your behalf and set the matter for trial. I am generally not in the mood for extensive conversation, because I have other matters on the calendar. I have no problem with the way the judge handled the situation in this video.
There is no law, just enforcement No matter what, by acting as one humans above other human this is a crime And for you and you relative I hope tommorow law won't be breathing or talking as you told by this law, bcz if you disagree, you can't be above that law right? sound very common sense?
@@profribasmat217 the 1st ammendent shouldnt have any stature of limitation. And its people like you who willingly take it up the tail pipe that make it so that i have to follow suit...facts
I don't care who you think you are or what laws you think you know. When in a court of law, the judge has total authority, absolute!! And they will prove it to you every time!! Don't think you can school a judge on the law, in her courtroom or you will pay the price. A judge is Always right, when in her gown, in her courtroom. weather she is wrong or not. It doesn't matter!! A judge is immune to prosecution, as long as she is the one behind the pulpit. During the procedings she is the one in control. Sorry but we, the American people gave her that authority when we voted for her. You need to read up on the law before posting. Yes we have our rights but so does she, when sitting in the judges seat. She has the power to set you free or put you in jail. A higher court might rule in your favor but she still keeps her job because she was doing her job the best she knew at the time. She was not knowingly committing any crime. And the point he was trying to make, should have been done in another court, not hers.
Nick you are an idiot. You are a bootlicking kiss ass cop loving moron. This judge was out of order. She is corrupt!! I hope you get sentenced to some jail time and they throw away the key. Because people like you should be locked up for life.
HORRIBLE JUDGE! Completely over stepping her authority! Law enforcement needs to do better! It's continually gotten worse and worse these past years. I'm honestly more scared of them than others!
@@brownbear9072 If you want to live in America, you follow our Constitution. America does not follow your rules. If you do not want to have a driver's license, then don't drive on our roads.
@@alanmcentee3035 I don't care if you're in america and have a driver license or not Or you drive the roads in america or not My comment was about been the peoples court, not her own personal court
You watch too much television. It is the People's Court and she represents the people of the country. That doesn't mean she represents you individually. You should have learned this in school. Assuming you're not a Russian sock puppet trying to sew discord. (Which is very possible with you're understanding of us legal system)
The guy broke the law,he got caught and instead of doing the intelligent thing and respect the court he decided to try and be smart even though he is obviously ill equipped.He was given the opportunity to apologize and chose instead to try and be smart again........she should have given him more than 15 days.
Dan261178 oh you mean more days after the punishment of being put in time out and then pink cuffs and dragged out so she could basically say "look who's really in charge you peasant"
Personally I dont believe the "pink cuffs" part but I stand by what I said.She spent many years studying law and more years earning the title of "judge" which,to my mind,earns rather more respect than his "smart" remarks after committing a crime and not having the sense to accept responsibility for his actions.
I feel bad for Gav. This is a case of not being able cope with the real world when the first grasp how it is. Much like Mr. Martinez. His questions were answered; he didn't like the answers. 🤷🏼♂️ If "sovereign citizens" really want to make a difference the should get a J.D. and get their name on a ballot. And btw, yes; this is justice. Contempt is a crime. 🤷🏼♂️
I think the judge gave him ample opportunities to not get himself locked up. First warnings was being sent to the holding tank. Even after he came back in the judge practically begged him to apologise repeatedly and he didn’t so he got himself locked up. You where already charged with driving with a suspended license so it’s an open n shut case. But this idiot went n got himself locked up. I thought the judge showed patience with him n gave him ample times to apologise. But saying that he is in fact in charge of the court is ridiculous.
Karen, guess who was handing out those gold stars. Not the generation receiving them. The generation receiving them did not want them because they do not mean anything. we've got that? Okay good deal. :-)
It’s weird how boomers always complain about shit like this when they were the ones to give us those stars. I remember getting them and I also remember not giving a shit about it either lmao
First off the description in the video is very misogynistic and sexist. That said, she did nothing wrong at all. This is an arraignment, you are there to plead guilty or not guilty, not fight the case. If u think it's wrong, plead not guilty and plead ur case at trial. But to get smart with a judge in their courtroom, is asinine. Seriously this is a stupid and misleading video.
The discretion permitted to judges in determining what is contempt and how to punish it has led some legal scholars to argue that the contempt power gives too much authority to judges. Earl C. Dudley, University of Virginia law professor, wrote that in the contempt power, "the roles of victim, prosecutor and judge are dangerously commingled." I am aware but more people need to know about how Due process that is completely ignored. This is one more way the legal system is broke. It is unconstitutional there for not enforceable by a judge as they take an oath to the constitution.
Ya ummmmmm I don’t see anything wrong here. He wouldn’t let the judge speak he kept talking over her. By the way it is her court room she is the judge lol. Maybe he shouldn’t drive on a suspended license.
I got locked up for winning a fight that the other guy started with i was guilty of defending myself self.i would have got 2 min in the penality box @ a hockey game i got 60 days for Knocking Out a dude that came @ me.juges will be judged them selfs.
ps. I also had 2 pay a lawyer 2500 then go to anger management 800 then 18 months of probation, and a piss test every wk. 25 a week, i wasn't even smoking weed or drinking she the judge took the advice of the da. that i had a past DUI.
I am so glad you are pointing this type of crime out. The way they act in the courtrooms put fear in people and make them not question them. Thank you for pointing out exactly what is wrong with our justice system.
using that logic, thats why hes in court (on the wrong side of it) to begin with, cause hes a fucking idiot that deserves to be there. she sent him away, took no time out of her day. im sure she drove home just fine that night and enjoyed a nice evening at home while he was in jail hashing out the definition of what victim is in the courts eyes.
“Victim” is a term for civil actions...he seems like abit of a jerk....I really don’t think she’s needing to be worshipped...I think she runs her court as any judge does...if any appointed officer of the court doesn’t go by the letter of the law..thennn, we have legal recourse...you, jumping the gun...being reactionary...doesn’t change that...just my opinion...one of millions...butttt...mine does have legal standing..
Eduardo Carrochio does that “reading” ever work?.....the law by design is a thing to be interpreted....but with that...i, you, Anyone has to still adhere to the LETTER of the law...meaning working within confines...the whole sovereign thing is flawed from the gate...using, driving on, living in, utilizing all that’s here...thennn, not wanting to adhere to the guidelines created to work for us all...is being abit of a brat, crying because you didn’t get the toy you wanted...you can be free and still appreciate the freedoms, I, and many I know, represented proudly serving this country...I’m no flag waver...we definitely, esp now...have morons running my country...that will never mean i can pick and choose our laws...judges have latitude, within the laws to run a court as they see...but the laws remain whole for us all...
Oh, LEGAL standing. But not lawful standing. Opinions are just opinions. The letter of the law killers. It is the spirit of the law, lest we all be embarrassed and doomed. And if the law is to be interpreted, then it really isn’t “by the letter,” now is it?
This guy is a sovereign citizen and just ignores the law when ever it is adverse to his agenda. The fact that this channel is now backing sovereign citizens shows that he is not just trying to hold the government accountable but rather side skirt the government with nonsense. That said I am generally against the concept of contempt charges.
Plead guilty to what... when charged with a crime, you have a right to face your accuser... a right to an attorney... etc... none of that was going on... the state was simply trying to generate revenue out of the populace.
@@rurome2151 You have the right to know the charge, If he claimed the charge was ambiguous, unknown, or unconstitutional, he should have challenged the jurisdiction of the court. He didn't. The judge is under no obligation to explain the charge. The only time the police must advise you of your right to a lawyer is if they intend on questioning you. He was not arrested. There was no trial. This was an arraignment , an administrative function for the court to claim jurisdiction over the offense and the party. The accuser need not be present for an administrative procedure. Whether the State was just trying to get revenue is irrelevant to the discussion. He was in direct contempt and is being punished for it.
One time someone made up a fake contract and signed my name to it. I told the judge I never signed it and honestly never did. The judge said I owed the money and didn't believe me that I didn't sign it. I looked at the judge and said you can believe what you want and you can order me to pay. But that doesn't make it true. Everyone in the courtroom gasped. The judge told me I had 2 options. Admit I signed it or he was going to sentence me to 90 days in jail on contempt of court.
it shouldnt have been a criminal offense, they upgrade it to have a higher fine, but, if they are going to make it criminal, the rules of courtroom procedure and how the charge is handled changes completely from a misdemeanor. once it becomes criminal the prosecution is required to produce a victim and PROVE damages, they dont' have to do this when it is a simple misdemeanor, but when it becomes a criminal case EVERYTHING changes. What most people are missing here is a lack of education in the justice system and the rules that apply concerning criminal cases, most here think that the judge has unbridled and absolutely authority in a case like this and she doesn't, when a case becomes a criminal charge the defendant has a right to a jury trial, not a bench trial, which occurs for simple traffic violations, the JURY is the one who decides a defendants guilt or innocense, the purpose of the judge is to make sure the defendant's rights are not violated and the attorney's on both sides don't try to operate outside of the law and rules of courtroom procedure, this guy was absolutely right in all he said and did, the sad thing is that the rights of the populous are being violated to such a degree that society is not only getting used to it, but actually thinks it is normal, that is what you are seeing in this case. The defendant has every right to have the court explain the nature of the charges and have the court prove jurisdiction, the defendant has a right to question the charges made against him and the JUDGE is NOT the ruling authority, the JUDGE is supposed to only oversee that courtroom procedure is followed. these JUDGES are overstepping the bounds of the law when they believe they are judge, jury, and executioner, they are supposed to be NEUTRAL but they are not and are really supposed to make sure the defendants rights are not violated and they ARE supposed to explain the rights the defendant has and as I said, make sure they are not violated. A judge is not supposed to have any bias in a case at all but judges nowadays consider you guilty from the time you walk in the door absent of proof from the prosecution. AS ILLOGICAL AS IT MAY SEEM TO YOU, THE GUILT OR INNOCENSE OF A DEFENDANT IS IRRELEVANT IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL, THE ONLY RELEVANCE IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL IS WHETHER THE COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION TO OVERSEE THE TRIAL AND IF THE PROSECUTION CAN PROVE THEIR CASE. I tool law for a year before I realized america does not have a justice system, only a LEGAL system, that is why many guilty defendants go free and many innocents are found guilty. Like I said, the sad thing here is the ignorance of those who would question the legality of what the man was doing, he was well within his rights to say and do all he did but all the untrained eye sees is someone trying to get out of a ticket and being rude to judge when just the opposite was true, very sad, it was the judge who was out of line and abusing her position.
Truth be told, the court is the victim in a case of direct contempt. And the case does not go to the jury. You don;t know jack. You took law for a year at Ed's Law School.
@Let the truth be told... While I understand what your saying and can agree with it, there is one part I'm not quite sure about. This video really had nothing to do with the defendants original charge of driving on a suspended license, but rather the charge of being in contempt of court. Being rude and/or sarcastic towards a judge I would think can get you into some hot watet, in this case it got the defendant 15 days in jail! The defendant may have started out by asking legitimate questions regarding his original charge, but when he told the judge that he was in charge of the courtroom and that she was in contempt, well.., that's where he fu**** up. That type of rhetoric is just asking for trouble in my opinion.
I agree luv, proper courtroom decorum and respect should be shown to judge. the nitwit comment was to the wannabe attorney david. the comment about producing a victim and proving damages I responded to was that of the citation, not contempt of court, also, the court being a victim is laughable.
@@@gladiator8325 LOL! My dad used to call me a nit wit all the time when I was a kid. Now that I'm all grown up and have had the pleasure of being a parent, (sigh) I look back and have to say my dad was right! LOL!! For once it wasn't directed at me though! I was thinking, one year of Law School may not qualify you to have your own practice, nor would it impress a Harvard professor, but that one year has given you far more knowledge than the average "Joe", David or myself. I don't know why people have to be so pugnacious, society gets no benefit from that kind of behavior at all. I'm ashamed to admit that I've been arrested a few times... like 5, 6 or 7? I lost count. Some of them were rather serious and of course, I was guilty as charged. However, other than a holding cell until I posted bail or was OR'd, I've never done any time yet I should've. Case in point: Fourteen years ago in CA I was charged with brandishing a handgun at 2 off duty Officers while in excess of 100mph with my two small children in the back seat, 7 more weapons in the trunk and over $400 worth of "dangerous fireworks" onboard. I had eluded the officers, however I then pulled off the interstate and had lunch at a McDonalds where I was subsequently discovered. For the very first time in my life I was rude and belligerent towards a peace officer. My weapons were confiscated, I wasn't given a receipt nor a citation nor handcuffed or detained. I was told I'd receive a letter notifying me of the date of my arraignment. I retained council to the tune of $15,000 and never went to court on the 3 felonies. One year later my attorney told me I had to choose which charge I would be found guilty of, all knocked down to misdemeanors. I was sentenced to 30 days with an anklet, $100 fine, 3 years probation during which I was to attend 52 parenting classes. I didn't take a single one! I signed up to satisfy the court at the time and the instructor was a total jerk. F*** him! Just before the end of my probation I made my attorney aware of what I hadn't done. Another $2,000 and all was well. Case closed. Yes, I was a fool, a stupid, ignorant, selfish dumbass that should've done some time, however I didn't. That brings me to what you said so, so correctly. "We have a legal system in this country, not a justice system." That is the absolute truth! Just ask myself or O.J. Simpson. Money and a good attorney buys a person freedom and there's no justice in that. All of this took place in CA about 14 years ago. The law frowned on the combination of guns and children back then, like they still do, but all 7 weapons were returned when the case was closed. Thank goodness, otherwise I'd have retained another attorney My son eventually learned to shoot those guns as well as others when he got a little older, like 8 or 9y/o. UNDER adult supervision, of course. I grew up in a very rural area in SoCal and at 9y/o I had my own .22 rifle. At 13 y/o a 12 guage shotgun and at 18y/o the local D.A. gave me a choice between jail or the service for GTA. So Uncle Sam presented me with a brand new , slightly used, metal and plastic black M-16 and s jeep. I wasn't allowed to keep either though. ;) I think part of the reason the court showed me leniency was because I'd just become a widower only 6 months prior to the crime. My 33y/o wiife had committed suicide leaving me and our 3 & 5 y/o children. By the time probation ended I had both kids attending a top notch, $10,000+_yr private academy where they wore uniforms and I had to drop them off, pick them up, pack their lunches and physically go over their homework every night. My kids were straight A students, had perfect attendence and were doing simple Geometry and Algebra by the 4th grade. Tell me that isn't a real live parenting class! That's why I never attended the court mandated one. I could've been found in contempt of court I suppose. Also, I'd previously spent 9 years in the USMC, received 3 Honorable Discharges and was part of Desert Shield & Desert Storm in Saudia Arabia & Iraq. My service record was/is exemplary. I think those factors may have helped me, but what about society? A combat vet, suffering from PTSD, caught speeding down the freeway pointing a gun at two morons that had badges ( and they were exactly that) while being armed and ready to confront the Republican Guard again if necessary shortly after losing his wife of 16 years! Damn, put like that I'm scaring myself! Bellevue, here I come! It's said that with age comes wisdom and maturity, I'm still looking for both! ;) I no longer drive a vehicle that I'd consider driving over 100mph. Instead I drive a 3/4 ton crew cab with an 18" lift and 46" tires that'll squash any import (or police car). I still carry a weapon, just one though, legally of course. I sold my house in CA, moved to another state and have no regrets doing so! At 53 y/o I'm retired, own my own home outright on 5 acres and can come and go wherever I want, when I want. I've since replaced the children with a female pit bull and (replaced the first wife)* with two more. However, the bad news is that before I turned 45 y/o I'd buried all three wives. The good news is... I'm not a suspect! LOL! No, there is no good news when burying a loved one. Three seperate incidents all unrelated, leaving behind 3 sets of grieving parents, a total of 6 children, a couple of ex husbands and me. Sometimes I think maybe the good Lord saw fit to give me a break in my legal matters, but punished me in my marital relationships. My last wife and I were only married 63 days. It isn't fair. Not only was I devastated upon getting the news, but my children had now lost 3 frickin' wonderful moms! Three of the best women a man could ever hope to meet! To me, Hell on Earth is watching your children in mental agony and as a parent there's nothing you can do to ease their suffering. THAT is Hell. If there was ever a good reason to go bonkers down a CA highway in excess of 100mph, that would be a good one. However, I'm tired of handing money out to attorneys and making them rich. Also I love my freedom and it would be reckless of me to put innocent people's lives in danger, possibly causing the very thing that my children and I went through three different times. Ha! There's that wisdom & maturity! LOL! Finally! ;) You Sir, or Ma'am, have yourself a wonderful day! I've texted your ear off and my finger to the bone while ranting and reminiscing! Thank you for the insight into a court room although I plan on never seeing the inside of one as a defendant ever again! ...but then, who actually plans on doing that? ;) Ciao! * "...replaced the first wife..." There's no such thing as replacing a wife. A wife is a human being, an individual, not an appliance from the local Sears store! When I wrote that it was just an easier way for me to make my point, is all. So for all you haters out there that want to rip me a new one for saying that or anything else I wrote, just don't. I have enough guilt to carry around as it is without spiteful idiots adding hatred to my burden!
@Scott Jacobsen How exactly am I part of the problem. Because I don't go and make a fool of my self, push the law and show disrespect to people. Ya'll think being confrontational is the answer to everything. So please explain How exactly I am part of the problem
@Scott Jacobsen you still have yet to tell me how I am part of the problem.To go into a court room and tell the Judge that it's not her court room was stupid. Just shows how arrogant people get when they think they now the law and let it get to there head. he was not there for a hearing, he was there to say his plea and get a court date. so he did not know the law and saw a cell block
@Mendoza Juan first off Juan, I for one dont get brought in front of judges for being stupid. 2. know why your there. He was not there for his day in court. he was there to find out when his day I court was. You act a fool, get treated like a fool. Be smart about what your doing. I am all for protecting you rights, But you have to know when the time to fight is and be properly prepared. He did not k ow when the time was, and was prepared like a fool.
What a waist of my time ... if everyone acted as this gentleman did we would have an even higher court backlog than we already do. Do you realize that we all pay for these institutions to operate? These are not buildings staffed with people for the pure entertainment for people with a chip on their shoulders.
if he was not driving for profit,cab driver,delivery driver,than he was not required to have a driver's license.he is a traveler.their is,and has never been a law stating drivers license is required to operate a mother vehicle.what was he pulled over for. it is our constitutional right to travel un molested by law enforcement or any other agencies.he broke no law.the judge did.also she blatantly disregarded the Constitution that she was sworn in to uphold.she is a disgrace
Norman Nichols im totally into all this shit if really gets me thinking. But you and me both know dosent matter how true that statement is it will get you NO WHERE. Other than adults bitching like children. Thats all ive seen so far.
So go in her courtroom and tell her she’s in contempt you yapping small dog. Dude was driving with suspended license, that’s illegal, it ain’t a constitutional issue.
With all due respect sir but are you nuts?? Of course the judge is always in charge!! That sir is the law!! If the nut driving with a suspended license had not done so then, guess what?? He wouldn't be in her court!! If you think he is right then your wrong too.Case closed.
He was wrongly convicted and was over powered by her lust of corrupted power, the justice system is corrupted and if you dont think so well my friend, i guess when you get wrongly convicted dont cry when that hammer drops on your balls and you get caught up in the corrupted system
The 'judge' is given authority to preside over a court of law. This is NOT a court of law. A court of law deals with crime and is a court of record with a jury of the defendants' peers. This court is none of those things so she is 'running' a fraudulent racket and should be in jail! This man told the judge otherwise and he challenged her jurisdiction which she was unable to prove - no victim, no crime, no law!
Come on do you see what being disrespectful brings you.. Jail time it brings you jail time .. If one of you're employee ( if you had any ) talk that way to you ... You would fire them...
kitty s we are citizens not an employee that can be gotten rid of because you dont like them, what you speak of is literal corruption and abuse of power. We are the ones supposed to hold the power not dumb power hungry cops
these judges have too much power. She sends him away for two weeks in jail because she did not like his attitude or what he said. It's sickening when you think about the other ramifications of her sentence. What about his job, loss of income,family while he is sent to jail for two weeks.....she does not care one bit and neither do the rest of people in the criminal justice system. As long as tyrants get their overpaid checks off the misery of others it's ok.
HE WAS TALKING OVER HER IN HER COURTROOM HER COURTROOM NOT HIS. I WOULD HAVE FOUND HIM IN CONTEMPT TOO YOU PEOPLE ARE ALL INSANE TO THINK UOU CAN WALK INTO A COUTROOM AND TALK OVER THE JUDGE. TO BAD SHE WASNT A MALE JUDGE CUZ HE WOULD HAVE BEEN JUST AS HARSH MAYBE MORE. AND IF YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT MISSING OUT ON WORK, CARETAKING A FAMILY OR WHATEVER CUZ YOURE IN JAIL DONT DISRESPECT Judges in their own courtrooms and learn the rules of court.
You can’t tell a judge you run her courtroom.
@@kendrakinard7580 SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT EXPOSE THE SCAM
Clearfield Trust Co. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363 (1942) [APPENDIX A]
In 1942 the Supreme Court made a decision that exposed the corporate government. It resulted in what is now
called the Clearfield Doctrine.
Summary of the Clearfield Doctrine
As all of our government "entities" (listed on Dun and Bradstreet) are doing business using private commercial
paper (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE), they have no more rights or privileges than any other corporation.
Because of the private currency we are all forced to use called the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE, our so-called
government has lost its sovereignty and has become no different than a mere private corporation. As such,
government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations. Therefore, if they intend
to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon their corporate statutes or rules, then they, like
any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it
and the one upon who demands for specific performance is made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before
trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. Without the contract, enforcement cannot take place
lawfully . . . unless you consent.
Bond vs. UNITED STATES 529 US 334 (2000) [APPENDIX B]
In 2000 the Supreme Court held that the American people are in fact sovereign and not the STATES or the
government. The court went on to define that local state and federal law enforcement officers were committing
unlawful action against the sovereign people by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their
actions.
The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, state legislatures, city councils,
municipalities and all state and federal courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of
government. All laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public
law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Since these government bodies are not sovereign,
they cannot promulgate or enforce criminal laws. Corporate 'governments' can only create and enforce civil laws,
which are bound to comply with the Law of Contracts.
@@sandragasman901you really missed the point . And I definitely am not gonna try and cut thru all your cognitive dissonance.
In short , our courts have become tyrannical .
@@sandragasman901 you're deluded
It should be retitled as a sovereign citizen gets his comeuppance.
STFU ! LMFAO !
I was think the same thing.🤣
May your chains rest lightly upon you.
He never claimed to be a sovereign of his own country. That's a different movement. He was simply exercising his constitutional rights. But I agree with the host of this video that we should not be angry and aggressive towards people like you who disagree with us. I don't say to you "STFU". please feel free to speak your mind but also be willing to listen to reasoned discussion of the contrary.
Lol 😂 ruclips.net/video/iz1y4kFHdiw/видео.html
Sorry, but in this instance I'm squarely behind the judge.
He would have had the opportunity to air his grievances at the next hearing date by simply pleading not guilty.
I agree, but what's up with the pink chains?
Than make all lawyers free. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for us but it gets cops off the hook every day.
@@jerrysmith5782 to humiliate him
@@brianMcGranahan0311 court appointed attorney?
Sorry Josh, but you sound like one of those "Social Justice Warriors" Judge was very tolerant and allowed the fellow to interrupt her numerous times. Are you aware Josh that the judge in the courtroom not only has ultimate authority, but if the President himself went into her courtroom, he could not over rule her, she would have authority over him.
The truth is , she can be overruled , that's why there are 3 branches of our government , to oversee each other . This just played out in a courtroom , they drug the judge out of court , tried and convicted her , then had to drag her off to jail , for 6 months . That's just the most recent in the judiciary shakeup happening lately , now Trump is in charge , many have resigned in shame .
@@mikeevans7560 Mike, yes there are the 3 branches of government and that is why one can not intrude on the other without due process. If the President enters the courtroom, he is subject to the head of the court. Just like if he comes before a house or Senate Committee to answer questions-now he may claim Executive Privilege but I'm not certain. For sure, there are a lot of judges who abuse their authority and I'm glad they are being exposed and removed from the bench. Interesting conversation Mike-have a good day.
That is while the President is in the court, but when he leaves the courtroom he assumes his' mantel of authority.
You're an idiot
You’re absolutely right. We need good people everywhere. Let’s expose all the crazy evil doers. This judge needs to be mentally evaluated. Take our power back! Hold evil doers accountable record and post all evil. Expose them!
We had a judge in Florida Florida that was a complete lunatic and sentenced a girl to jail because she was afraid to show up for a domestic violence case.... but I am happy to report she was actually reprimanded and eventually I believe she was thrown off the bench! Thank God because she was completely insane and hated women I worked in the court system in new all about her.
Imagine if Josh was her son, would she treated him like that and having him go to jail just because he doesn't listen to what she said. Probably not! But I wish her kids would have done the same thing to see how will she do to them. I can't believe that people can go to jail when they exercise theirs rights in court.
Come on, spouting nonsense to try and weasel out of a traffic violation? This guy fills half of my Sovereign Citizens bingo card.
I am an attorney and I see absolutely nothing wrong with what the Judge did or said. He is in contempt of court. If he doesn't understand court procedure, he should retain counsel. There are rules of court for a reason and he is not, in any way, complying with those rules. He is refusing to answer the court's questions and not giving the court any indication he understands these proceedings.
I have sued 16 Judges in Texas (12 "STATE" and 4 Federal) in the last 14 months, after Judge Andrew Hathcock, and Judge Scott Jenkins, took away my children in court case #: D-1-FM-03-000048, in spite of me committing NO CRIMES, simply because I went public with the TRUE STORY of my black girlfriend (Jenna Lenee Jackson) being RAPED, and sadly tricked into getting an ABORTION, by a PIMP named: Vadik Marmer, who PROUDLY posted a video on Facebook titled: "HOW TO BRAINWASH GIRLS INTO THE BURNING MAN CULT", for the whole world to see. Isn't it funny that I had to file the suits against the Judges "Pro Se" because NO ATTORNEY WOULD HELP ME AS AN INDIGENT PERSON???
Why are they called Honarable, if ya don't even know em;!
Borinstein Springer, LLP contempt of court? What is that ?
Blah blah blah.....Hey sunshine....Anyone can file a lawsuit.
Stop whining and become a productive member of society
Look it up.....Jesus Christ.
here ...chew on this.
And then ask more stupid questions
www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByArticle/Chapter_5A/Article_2.pdf
I’m interested- was this man actually guilty of driving without a valid drivers license? If so, he has broken the law. You don’t do something against the law then try and just talk your way out of it. It’s like the old saying goes. You want to do the crime, be prepared to do the time
Ummm ever here of the old saying Let the punishment for the crime?
ABSOLUTELY jack. Good for you. The sanity of most the comments on this video are refreshing.
Exactly the guy who made this video just wasted everyone's time and proven that he only has this stance is because she has brought a lot of negative attention to himself most likely in a courtroom like doing what you're not supposed to be doing and now he feels like this Warrior fighting for justice but in reality she's most likely one of those people who blame everyone else
Am I missing something? All I saw was a judge doing her job correctly. The time for questions has passed at this point, this is a plea hearing. Well done judge.
She was professional. This is a court. He can't go in there with his interpretation of the law amd do what he wants. This guy is a fool.. and so is the guy who posted it.
EXACTLY, Tbis youtuber just doesn't like the Justice system.
I agree. 15 days however does seem excessive.
The judge is not having the SovCit nonsense. She was quick and to the point. Good for her
This guy was warned a few times. Besides that every one in the free world knows driving on a suspended liscence is a crime. Stop being some cry babies and man up when you get caught breaking the law
15 days in jail is a bit over the top though
@@dillydillypickle9620 In the UK it would be six months
Darrell Kimberling
She has a god mentality
I agree that his suspended liscence is a crime and he should have sucked it up but she needs to be held to a higher standard. The way she acts like she physically owns that courtroom is ridiculous
@@naturaltranquillityaudioim1916 but this is America not the UK. we have rights that no one can take away from us . Like him legally asking questions about his own case. He was also representing himself so he needed to ask those questions. The judge was in the wrong
HoneyBadger MalDog. That court room is jers to run just like your house hold is yours to run. You wouldnt let me come in and talk to you anyway i felt and disrespect yiur home. That guy needed to just close his mouth and face the consequences of his actions.
Oh, so he thought that it was HIS courtroom, and she was in contempt. All I saw was his unbelievable arrogance talking over her. He’s lucky he only got 15 days.
He said OUR courtroom... the judge was partial and that's enough for a mistrial
Agree 100%!
EXACTLY
Whether anyone thinks the judge is corrupt isn't my issue with what happened here. What I see is a citizen being charged with driving on a suspended license then telling a judge she is not in charge of her court room. Are you kidding me????? Last time I checked driving on a suspended license is an offense in any state.
Debra D amazing! You got to the heart of this and I bet you’re not even a lawyer. He deserves every second in custody he got and only himself to blame. These idiots always pull this and always end up in jail or prison.
You guys are both idiots keep bending over for the corrupted I don’t understand what’s wrong with standing up for our rights and to uphold the constitution.
@@madskillzgaming4465 That's right! These people are part of the problem, they've been brainwashed! They will bend over and take it up the arse without lube cuz someone told them its the law! They have no clue about their constitutional rights! When you don't use them, you lose them!
Or country for that matter, nutter tried to be a smartass and got his ass handed to him.
@@america1403 Getting your legal education from RUclips College is not a good idea. Anyone that thinks the moron presenting this video is anywhere near correct, is just asking to end up behind bars for the same reason.
It is her court. She is the boss here. And it is Constitutional.
Get these tyrants out of this free country.
This is normal in Las Vegas and My story of what happened to me on multiple occasions, between the police and judges makes this look like nothing. It was bad enough for me to leave the US permanently. Good luck with your corrupt and unprofessional system.
The original question was "Are you guilty or Not guilty of driving without a licence". I don't like our legal system either but just because you want to try and bamboozle the judge with crap, does not make you a legal genius or a defender of civil rights.
blthetube1 guilty of what . in reality you don't need a license to drive unless is for business. do your research that guy obviously did.
Carlos Chevalier Chevalier Don't know what country you're talking about, but it sure as hell ain't the United States where this man was charged. You can't operate a motor vehicle on the road without a license, dumb ass. Suggest you do your own research, because you pull that shit with any cop and you're going to find your ass standing before a Judge too.
Saber Redd Carlos is from a shithole country.
Do you need a license to drive a bicycle? Can you get a DUI on a bicycle? See by signing a drivers license you are bound by CONTRACT law, hence why you have to PAY aka consideration to get a license. Ever wonder why they are not free?
You can operate a motor vehicle without a licence if its not being used for a commercial activity, read the federal laws. Licences only hold water if you got one from the state in the first place and signed the contract for it(and made an exchange of money for said contract, aka fee for licence) read the laws and you will see this is a system used by the states to trap people into something that is essentially unconstitutional.
The guy starts talking over the Judge while she is speaking then says he"s in charge of the court ahhh not going to end well for you buddy
researcher 55 actually he said "we" are control meaning the people the american government was created as a dictatorship he was in the right.
Mason Jones actually at 3:04 when Mr Martinez is brought back into court , the Judge clearly states that Mr Martinez said he was in charge of court and she was in contempt then again at 3:46 at this point Mr Martinez does not challenge the Judge ???
researcher 55 if you can go listen he says “we” just because she misconstrued what he said doesn’t make her correct.
DontTreadOnMeXXX he said “we”
DontTreadOnMeXXX i know i think he just wasnt trying to keep instigating the situation the judge was obviously making it personal and forgot about the law
I ABSOLUTELY concur with the judge. The poster of this video (Josh) represents a demographic of scofflaws in this country that has little to no respect for the rule of law. I wish I were a judge and he (Josh) comes before me. I would throw the book of him.
A judge can commit criminal contempt for the court
1 Timothy 2:12
“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.”
Damn straight and a woman will abuse authority and exercise great disrespect towards a man when given such a position... Those sworn by the "Oath" to uphold the Law spit in the face of it and the "Constitution,"
this is why God clearly states the following as in the KJV:
(1) A woman should learn in quietness and full submission.
(2) I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.
(3) For Adam was formed first, then Eve.
(4) And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.
@@thespearodiver No. God doesn't state it. These were both written by Paul. Not God. Not Jesus.
@Robin Justice
Man hater, lmfao!
@Robin Justice
Silence Robin, Silence! 🙊
@Robin Justice
Why don't you go take a powder, preferably arsenic, LOL.
He is one of those 'sovereign citizens' who speak gibberish. The judge did the right thing.
She was a five star judge. Her actions had nothing to do with worshipping her. He showed total lack of respect for the court. She could've gave him 30 days.
Yes! This channel is just as stupid as this guy!
@@mikemcintosh295 I'm sorry, but I find it hard to feel any respect for any of the institutions in this country .
@@statinskill I can understand your point of view but there's a right and a wrong way of conducting yourself. Our system of justice definitely has its problems.
@@michaelmcintosh5818 -- Yes, but we are now at the point where we need to purge and liquidate to fix * any * sort of institution, not just the courts. Don't let that put you off, these things happen regularly and are important for the health of the political body. Just think what would have happened in Chile, if Allende and his cronies had been permitted to carry out their filthy work. Or what would have happened in Indonesia if they had not destroyed millions of leftists in 1965.
The judge behaved completely correctly. Mr Martinez is an idiot, wasting the court’s time.
Gavin: It might help if you actually learned a little about the actual law before jumping on your hobby horse to try and defend the indefensible.
Truly an arrogant dick. I wish he would STFU and just show the video.
This is the BIGGEST problem in this country. KANGAROO Courts
They are not judges they are defacto administrators.
Driving is a privilege and not a right so why waste the courts time with bullshit.
Maybe he should get a valid permit for that privilege instead of ranting about victims.
It was a driving charge. He could stop driving but since it is considered a priveledge, the injured party doesn’t apply. Should people be allowed to drive totally drunk and put everyone at risk if no one calls the cops on them? Sometimes common sense needs to be used
Our friend, Common Sense, died a long time ago. R.I.P.
Dammed. I am with the judge on this one. Disrupt the court with the crazy sovereign rants and you get to visit your local county jail.
Maya Sativa mouth off at a judge get sent to county jail. That’s the rule in any courtroom. Learn humility.
No shit.
How about not drive on a suspended license....
Whenever a person labels someone as "intelligent, well-spoken, polite" or any other obviously observable trait, they instantly lose all credibility.
Uh...What?
The judge is in charge of their court. people are disrepectiful!
Judge Judy would put him in his place like her. he should have been locked up.
This was not the trial. All he had to say was not guilty and then say what's needs to be said at trial. He would have not got locked up. At trial is when you do all the talking. Or ask for dismissal instead of trying to get somewhere when that was not the time to do it
Yeah that SOUNDS good, but that is not the way it really works is it? Just say what needs to be said at trial right? That is part of the scam. I have had more than my share or experience dealing with the legal system, far more than I care to admit. Most people do not have the time to show up to court for an arraignment, then show up for continuance after continuance, missing day after day of work, to finally get to defend themselves. The system is set up like that so you just pay the fine and they get their money.
He is a lawyer, I think he knows what he is doing and talking about.
@@TracyGunz Really? Because it looks like he is defending himself and has a public defender seated next to him..Just saying..ya know the old saying about a person who defends himself has a fool for a client? yeah pretty much. Poor guy didn't stand a chance.
@@axlef1513 Wrong, that is how it works.
If you want to claim the protection of our Constitution then you also have to accept the responsibilities of that Constitution. That includes the part where the courts get to decide the law and settle disputes between citizens and between citizens and their government. You do not get to cherry pick only the parts you like.
Remember, if you do not like our social order then no one is preventing you from leaving. I understand Somalia has lots of beach front property available with no taxes or gun laws. They also don't have any courts or police. Or government, unless you consider the warlord with the most guns the government.
It will never be a real trial as a trial is criminal matter all he's broken a policy he has not consented to.
I have an idea...Don't let ur license get suspended. Don't have a reason to go to court and you wont need reasons to twist the law in ur favor.
Domenick Shaget finally some common sense!
That is why you dont represent yourself before court...
I’m usually the first one to stand up and point a finger at corrupt or fascist leaning officials. But his comment challenging the judges authority was quite simply counter productive to his own line of questions. You can tell cops on the street they are working for you all day but you can’t step into a damn court and expect to argue semantics with the judge! And this is coming from someone who HATES admitting when police or judges are in the right.
You guys are mixing up the constitution with the law book
I think the blood spilled for the dream was that they should be one and the same 😕
The constitution is law jackass. And non debatable..people like you who take it up the tail pipe are the reason everyone else has to follow suit..
I just learned something new today. LOL SMH
That guy is a clown
EvenStar LoveAnanda . Iv red the constitution so what does that have to do with both the commentator and the defendant being a clown .the guy was clearly in contempt of court . When your in a courtroom there is only one person in charge that's the judge .
H.O FL350
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She was denying him do process so the judge lost jurisdiction over him.
And he took control of the court room.
You are a dumb ass and you don't understand how the law works.
The guy did everything right, but the judge is corrupt.
You Americans are your own worst enemy.
You always argue against your own rights and best interest.
And you have no idea what you have inherited from your founding fathers.
Shame on you ALL.
@Nik Kingman ... That's funny! :))
EvenStar loveAnanda . Please tell me your not a sovereign citizen nut . Iv dealt with a few and the one thing Iv learned was not to wast my time arguing with them . If you can't live by the laws move on . And why is it that most sovereign citizens have past criminal records and they try anything thing they can not to follow are laws . This will be my only time I respond to you no matter what you write so you have a great life and maybe will meet one day when your traveling down one of the roads I patrol . And will see how far you get with I'm not driveing I'm traveling so I don't need a drivers license . Take it easy .
This was not the judge's fault. I'm not really big on the 'system" but this was an arraignment where there is only one question: How do you plead? She immediately asked that question. At that point there are only two possible answers: Guilty, or not guilty. If he pleaded guilty, the case is over. If he pleaded NOT guilty, the trial can begin, he can request a trial by jury, and ask all the questions he wants. Instead, he chose a "third" option that does NOT exist -- an argument! He may as well have started to ask her why she drives a certain kind of car. Nothing else mattered at that time. He WAS in contempt. He was/is a trouble-maker. She might have explained the situation to him better and cited the fact that there are only two lawfully acceptable responses to "guilty or not guilty."
You and people like you are the problem.....!!
Or no contest
When we trade our freedoms for safety, we end up with neither one. Thomas Jefferson
That is true but dose not apply in this case. We have had our rights stripped after 9/11 and that is what would apply, not a douchebag wanting to drive without a license or insurance.
First of all, it was Benjamin Franklin who made that statement. What he actually said:
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
Second - he wasn’t talking about liberty in the context you are implying. It was in a letter to the Pennsylvania Governor from the Pennsylvania State Assembly regarding taxes on the Penn families land to raise money to defend the frontier during the French/Indian conflicts.
Third - Franklin OWNED two slaves. Jefferson OWNED over 600. These are not the type of men that I look to when I need pointers on Liberty.
Contextomy. Look it up.
Judge seemed fair to me
No way, by the looks of things, she knew that the guy caught her for doing the wrong thing so she got him arrested just to feel better about it. That is really what happened!!
It's the judges courtroom.. that's why they're called a judge... Selected by our Congress.. truly the jury is in charge of a certain case but when you break the law, you get made an example of.. that's how it works. Stop whining and obey the law and there won't be a problem. Don't start no shit, won't be none.
*judge's
Joseph Naron this judge was elected
Josh trying to show off in court and got his ass handed to him. Imagine your driving to the corner store and out of nowhere Josh hits you in his car. He has a suspended license, good luck getting insurance money from Josh. Now your in the hospital and paying out of pocket because this nit-wit thinks the laws and rules don't apply to him. Kinda wish the Judge gave him 30 days.
Its not her courtroom it belongs to the people that she is supposed to work for. I don't know why they think they deserve respect, they have done nothing to earn it.
Judge is doing well considering the perp is being a jerk. He’ll get attitude adjustment shortly.
Furthermore this is why america is failing. Don’t drive without licence, and if you get caught, be a man not a punk and take your lumps. There was a good reason to put him in the clink.
I totally agree with you. Wow! He was just being an ass. I don't believe for a minute she wanted to b worshipped. I wholeheartedly believe she only wanted the respect that she deserves in that Court room.
If a man can't pay child support. He goes to jail.meanwhile our government doesn't pay back any money it owes.let that sink in..
If a man decides to take drug(s), risk his own body. Goverment steps in. You know why? You aint free, they own your sorry ass body. GET THAT? More then 50% of people in jail is non-violence drug addicts. They threat them as criminals, while it's obvious it's a mental health problem.
This is the world we live in, this is what they call justice. They thought me to respect the police but how the fuck can I respect this shit? It's impossible. Yes, we need police.. No, they aint doing their job they are PISSING on us 24/7 and because we got ALOOOOT of braindead neighbors, they can do whatever the FUCK they want.
Doe Mea T if they wanna use drugs and die then so be it.
Doe Mea T let them do so
yup
Oh I agree, Her court room is as fake as the paper gold she wants. If you aint learn to hate them mfr on paper your gunna get steamrolled. Believe me, i just slammed a state trooper with a public pretender who didnt do nothing but beg me to plea out. That mf'r can prononce death but couldnt tell the difference between a motorcycle + a air cooled clutchless scooter. Bet he wont try that bs again. I hate these young evangelical punks with a badge. Law is an idea, not reality
Good job judge, for not taking his BS. Thank you for not wasting the court time and public money.
The lady deserves respect..you young punks have no respect today...he broke the law and is a smart ads...get a life..
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT EXPOSE THE SCAM
Clearfield Trust Co. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363 (1942) [APPENDIX A]
In 1942 the Supreme Court made a decision that exposed the corporate government. It resulted in what is now
called the Clearfield Doctrine.
Summary of the Clearfield Doctrine
As all of our government "entities" (listed on Dun and Bradstreet) are doing business using private commercial
paper (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE), they have no more rights or privileges than any other corporation.
Because of the private currency we are all forced to use called the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE, our so-called
government has lost its sovereignty and has become no different than a mere private corporation. As such,
government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations. Therefore, if they intend
to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon their corporate statutes or rules, then they, like
any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it
and the one upon who demands for specific performance is made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before
trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. Without the contract, enforcement cannot take place
lawfully . . . unless you consent.
Bond vs. UNITED STATES 529 US 334 (2000) [APPENDIX B]
In 2000 the Supreme Court held that the American people are in fact sovereign and not the STATES or the
government. The court went on to define that local state and federal law enforcement officers were committing
unlawful action against the sovereign people by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their
actions.
The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, state legislatures, city councils,
municipalities and all state and federal courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of
government. All laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public
law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Since these government bodies are not sovereign,
they cannot promulgate or enforce criminal laws. Corporate 'governments' can only create and enforce civil laws,
which are bound to comply with the Law of Contracts.
He kept passing up good opportunities to shut up.
He asked completely legal questions until he actually said "we are in control of this court." At that point he stepped out of line.
Stop trying to be a shock vlogger.
He was in contempt of court and you are just spouting crap.
anonimous chicka... technically the people are in control of the courts as tax payers. Technically, judges work for us as appointed officers of court. Without taxes there'd be no judges.
You may not like it but it is the law. You don't talk over judge and if judge decides somebody is disrupting proceedings he/she is well within rights to restore the order by issuing fines and sometimes even jail time. This is very practical matter and has nothing to do with worshipping. There must be a written record of everything anybody said and it is impossible when people are talking over each other. Anybody would be able to drag any proceeding indefinitely if he/she was allowed to disrupt proceeding however they liked. Judge's role is to remind of the rules and enforce them when necessary. Within court room, there is nothing you can accomplish that you could not accomplish by answering questions, filing motions and generally proceeding within established process.
This is not a court of record idiot which is the point that this man was making. Not a court of record then not a court of law! Therefore the judge has NO JURISDICTION AND IS ACTING IN TREASON!
But he was in the wrong tho. He has an suspended license. What did you expect.
America is only a country to native Americans, otherwise it's a corporation. United States For America, not "Of."
Totally stolen comment, i seen it elsewhere
@@ianfixter2881 HAHAHAAHA!
I think the judge handle this perfectly good for her
Minnesota case. I was ordered to Show cause why summary judgment should not be granted, per court order I came and presented evidence, in which judge refused to take and claimed that the court hearing is to show cause why I should not be found in the contempt. I said I do not understand what the judge attempting to order here, when clearly it states show cause why summary judgment should not be granted and that is the reason I am here to do so, due to the fact I have material evidence that shows I was defrauded, misrepresented.
The judge said show cause is the same as show cause, contempt. I said that orders here are two different orders and should be void for vagueness and that I demand a fair trial. I was alleged with contempt of the court. Next morning Judge again demanded to comply with their order, in which I replied that he violated my civil and constitutional rights and without due process. I was sentenced for 180days/6 month, in which later released without an official hearing, no trial.
Next day after I was released, I went to the court. I demanded this case to be tried by Jury and the judge confirmed and made a claim that Jury will be established. I was tricked into a bench trial. No jury was established.
Still fighting this case as a pro se.
Fighters of Rights. Men of God. Keep up the good fight against corruption, injustice, and servants of bad faith.
You're not going to go into ANY courtroom and tell a judge you're in charge.
I will one day
Land of the free is a myth
So is home of the brave, if so many were brave the corporate govt would not exist because the militia would've taken them out by force long ago
Chris Manley - Exactly.
Four more idiots to add to the Christmas list. Hay, the line is very short if you want to leave, I do not think many would cry if you left.
mike53153
Exactly, either you accept all the bullshit and take it like a man if you want to stay or live. The choice is yours, so stop crying like a baby 🤣🤣
Chris Manley Survival of the fittest: The prisoners Bible. By Chief Shuaib Y. Israel. Google The book! FACE THE Music!
U evidently believe that people should not b held accountable for their actions. Hooray 4 the judge doing what is necessary to keep the peace even in the court of law.
Where did this clown with the goatee go to law school? As for the other clown, he should have hired a lawyer. He go what he deserved.
Umm.. i disagree. Under Corpus Juris Appendum under the subheading "Attorney & Client" it explains attorney's have a dual obligation, and their primary obligation is to the government, not their client. Legally if you hire an attorney you are, by law, a "client" to the court. Consequently a "client" is defined as a "ward of the court". When you look up "ward of the court" in blacks law dictionary it says "a ward of the court is an infant or a person of unsound mind" so by definition, if you hire an attorney, you're of unsound mind.. basically.. saying if you hire an attorney you're an idiot.
Where did YOU go to law school?
Eric Bland Georgetown. Recheck your reply. Just SMH
Yes it is absolutely OK for a judge to behave that way. You do not talk over the judge, you do not claim you are in charge of the courtroom, because you are not. He was rightfully sentenced for being in contempt of court. She gave him even the chance to apologize and avoid the sentence, but he was too stupid to do it.
At the same time, the judge clearly stated "the city is the victim, yes". Which makes this a federal case, to be heard in a federal court.
@terry.....you are a very obedient little slave. Congratulations, you get a gold 🌟 from this phsyco, ignorant medium level Master so called judge.
Lol she isn’t sweating I can promise that😂 if any punishment has been done for what she did then I would be amazingly surprised.
Shes always...always on the rag...with fumes...
Retired California lawyer, retired Oregon judge here. When I ask you for a plea during your arraignment, I expect to hear "guilty" or "not guilty" or "no contest" (I never got to hear "not guilty by reason of insanity.") I have the authority to enter a "not guilty" plea on your behalf and set the matter for trial. I am generally not in the mood for extensive conversation, because I have other matters on the calendar. I have no problem with the way the judge handled the situation in this video.
Well i guess you should have chose a different profession.
The fact that someone might get locked in a box because of your mood shows that there is a problem with the system.
Judge right. Martinez wrong. So simple.
Jon McLane wow what a real intellectual
Every one needs to start holding all people who think they are above the law and can abuse their power accountable like all of you!
I hope your talking to the judge
There is no law, just enforcement
No matter what, by acting as one humans above other human this is a crime
And for you and you relative I hope tommorow law won't be breathing or talking as you told by this law, bcz if you disagree, you can't be above that law right? sound very common sense?
@@profribasmat217 the 1st ammendent shouldnt have any stature of limitation. And its people like you who willingly take it up the tail pipe that make it so that i have to follow suit...facts
I don't care who you think you are or what laws you think you know. When in a court of law, the judge has total authority, absolute!! And they will prove it to you every time!! Don't think you can school a judge on the law, in her courtroom or you will pay the price. A judge is Always right, when in her gown, in her courtroom. weather she is wrong or not. It doesn't matter!! A judge is immune to prosecution, as long as she is the one behind the pulpit. During the procedings she is the one in control. Sorry but we, the American people gave her that authority when we voted for her. You need to read up on the law before posting. Yes we have our rights but so does she, when sitting in the judges seat. She has the power to set you free or put you in jail. A higher court might rule in your favor but she still keeps her job because she was doing her job the best she knew at the time. She was not knowingly committing any crime. And the point he was trying to make, should have been done in another court, not hers.
Nick you are an idiot. You are a bootlicking kiss ass cop loving moron. This judge was out of order. She is corrupt!! I hope you get sentenced to some jail time and they throw away the key. Because people like you should be locked up for life.
HORRIBLE JUDGE! Completely over stepping her authority! Law enforcement needs to do better! It's continually gotten worse and worse these past years. I'm honestly more scared of them than others!
Lol. The author of this video is a prime example of why the world laughs at Americans
“My court.” I thought it was the People’s court.
The judge is correct - it is in fact her court
Well if it is her court
And not the peoples court,
Is the same if it is your personal house, I don't wanna go or be at your personal house
@@brownbear9072 If you want to live in America, you follow our Constitution. America does not follow your rules. If you do not want to have a driver's license, then don't drive on our roads.
@@alanmcentee3035
I don't care if you're in america and have a driver license or not
Or you drive the roads in america or not
My comment was about been the peoples court, not her own personal court
You watch too much television. It is the People's Court and she represents the people of the country. That doesn't mean she represents you individually.
You should have learned this in school. Assuming you're not a Russian sock puppet trying to sew discord. (Which is very possible with you're understanding of us legal system)
The guy broke the law,he got caught and instead of doing the intelligent thing and respect the court he decided to try and be smart even though he is obviously ill equipped.He was given the opportunity to apologize and chose instead to try and be smart again........she should have given him more than 15 days.
Dan261178 oh you mean more days after the punishment of being put in time out and then pink cuffs and dragged out so she could basically say "look who's really in charge you peasant"
Personally I dont believe the "pink cuffs" part but I stand by what I said.She spent many years studying law and more years earning the title of "judge" which,to my mind,earns rather more respect than his "smart" remarks after committing a crime and not having the sense to accept responsibility for his actions.
She should have given him a pink tight leather pants too with matching pink collar.
He talked over her when she was trying to speak. She is the judge. though 24 hours would have been a bit more appropriate I think)
I feel bad for Gav. This is a case of not being able cope with the real world when the first grasp how it is.
Much like Mr. Martinez. His questions were answered; he didn't like the answers. 🤷🏼♂️
If "sovereign citizens" really want to make a difference the should get a J.D. and get their name on a ballot.
And btw, yes; this is justice. Contempt is a crime. 🤷🏼♂️
Sorry it is the judges court room, she is where the buck stops. She kept cool and he was in contempt of court and got what he deserved!
I think the judge gave him ample opportunities to not get himself locked up. First warnings was being sent to the holding tank. Even after he came back in the judge practically begged him to apologise repeatedly and he didn’t so he got himself locked up. You where already charged with driving with a suspended license so it’s an open n shut case. But this idiot went n got himself locked up. I thought the judge showed patience with him n gave him ample times to apologise. But saying that he is in fact in charge of the court is ridiculous.
degree7 yup
Some child molesters don't even get 15 days.
The result of the "everyone gets a gold star" generation in full effect.
Karen, guess who was handing out those gold stars. Not the generation receiving them. The generation receiving them did not want them because they do not mean anything. we've got that? Okay good deal. :-)
@@legalfictionnaturalfact3969 wow. Good point
It’s weird how boomers always complain about shit like this when they were the ones to give us those stars. I remember getting them and I also remember not giving a shit about it either lmao
First off the description in the video is very misogynistic and sexist. That said, she did nothing wrong at all. This is an arraignment, you are there to plead guilty or not guilty, not fight the case. If u think it's wrong, plead not guilty and plead ur case at trial. But to get smart with a judge in their courtroom, is asinine. Seriously this is a stupid and misleading video.
thats false imprisonment!....and someone needs to take her off that court room put her back in her liveing room that she does own hahahaha
Where is Due process for the contempt of court then there wasnt any that is clear
Ignore the troll...tamedawg...paid shill (rejected LEO).
The discretion permitted to judges in determining what is contempt and how to punish it has led some legal scholars to argue that the contempt power gives too much authority to judges. Earl C. Dudley, University of Virginia law professor, wrote that in the contempt power, "the roles of victim, prosecutor and judge are dangerously commingled." I am aware but more people need to know about how Due process that is completely ignored. This is one more way the legal system is broke. It is unconstitutional there for not enforceable by a judge as they take an oath to the constitution.
If I talked stupid and rude in a court ,I'd expect slammer time . His parents never checked his manners as a kid .They're as bad as him .
Ya ummmmmm I don’t see anything wrong here. He wouldn’t let the judge speak he kept talking over her. By the way it is her court room she is the judge lol. Maybe he shouldn’t drive on a suspended license.
It ISN'T her courtroom... It was paid for by the CITIZENS of the United States, she works for us! Don't ever forget that you pay them!
Have you seen the one with the crazy judge being drug out and jailed! She got what was coming to her!
I got locked up for winning a fight that the other guy started with i was guilty of defending myself self.i would have got 2 min in the penality box @ a hockey game i got 60 days for Knocking Out a dude that came @ me.juges will be judged them selfs.
ps now i can't get a job.
ps. I also had 2 pay a lawyer 2500 then go to anger management 800 then 18 months of probation, and a piss test every wk. 25 a week, i wasn't even smoking weed or drinking she the judge took the advice of the da. that i had a past DUI.
I am so glad you are pointing this type of crime out. The way they act in the courtrooms put fear in people and make them not question them. Thank you for pointing out exactly what is wrong with our justice system.
Lol
If he knows the law so much he should know its the law to have a valid license 😂
That is why she is still in traffic court, she is considered a lame judge by her own.
using that logic, thats why hes in court (on the wrong side of it) to begin with, cause hes a fucking idiot that deserves to be there.
she sent him away, took no time out of her day. im sure she drove home just fine that night and enjoyed a nice evening at home while he was in jail hashing out the definition of what victim is in the courts eyes.
“Victim” is a term for civil actions...he seems like abit of a jerk....I really don’t think she’s needing to be worshipped...I think she runs her court as any judge does...if any appointed officer of the court doesn’t go by the letter of the law..thennn, we have legal recourse...you, jumping the gun...being reactionary...doesn’t change that...just my opinion...one of millions...butttt...mine does have legal standing..
he was reading from the sovereign citizen playbook.
Eduardo Carrochio does that “reading” ever work?.....the law by design is a thing to be interpreted....but with that...i, you, Anyone has to still adhere to the LETTER of the law...meaning working within confines...the whole sovereign thing is flawed from the gate...using, driving on, living in, utilizing all that’s here...thennn, not wanting to adhere to the guidelines created to work for us all...is being abit of a brat, crying because you didn’t get the toy you wanted...you can be free and still appreciate the freedoms, I, and many I know, represented proudly serving this country...I’m no flag waver...we definitely, esp now...have morons running my country...that will never mean i can pick and choose our laws...judges have latitude, within the laws to run a court as they see...but the laws remain whole for us all...
Heidi.....I’m hardly brilliant...lol...I strive for “passable” at best..but thank you..pays to be married to a lawyer here...for sixteen years...lol
Oh, LEGAL standing. But not lawful standing. Opinions are just opinions.
The letter of the law killers. It is the spirit of the law, lest we all be embarrassed and doomed.
And if the law is to be interpreted, then it really isn’t “by the letter,” now is it?
MAVEN FELICIANO ...nothing more dangerous than someone with more opinions than knowledge about the law...you’re that person...and it’s scary
Bro, was your license suspended or not??? Jesus!
That has nothing to do with prohibiting his right to ask legal questions? You must be one of those that doesn't know your rights and doesn't care to.
@@dreamsentinelproductions852 No, actually I'm just nosy! LOL
This guy is a sovereign citizen and just ignores the law when ever it is adverse to his agenda. The fact that this channel is now backing sovereign citizens shows that he is not just trying to hold the government accountable but rather side skirt the government with nonsense. That said I am generally against the concept of contempt charges.
When god ask her questions then let’s see what she does then
There is no god...tooth fairy...Santa...Bigfoot or leprechaun.
which God ??? Budda Visnoo Thor ....
This guy thinks he's Batman
Wait, he's not
He is Batman
Why not plead NOT guilty and wait to present your case?
Because he stood up for himself, unlike most "Sheep" in America....
Plead guilty to what... when charged with a crime, you have a right to face your accuser... a right to an attorney... etc... none of that was going on... the state was simply trying to generate revenue out of the populace.
@@rurome2151 You have the right to know the charge, If he claimed the charge was ambiguous, unknown, or unconstitutional, he should have challenged the jurisdiction of the court. He didn't. The judge is under no obligation to explain the charge.
The only time the police must advise you of your right to a lawyer is if they intend on questioning you. He was not arrested.
There was no trial. This was an arraignment , an administrative function for the court to claim jurisdiction over the offense and the party. The accuser need not be present for an administrative procedure.
Whether the State was just trying to get revenue is irrelevant to the discussion. He was in direct contempt and is being punished for it.
That is what he was supposed to do.
@@alanmcentee3035 The charge was driving on a suspended license.
One time someone made up a fake contract and signed my name to it. I told the judge I never signed it and honestly never did. The judge said I owed the money and didn't believe me that I didn't sign it. I looked at the judge and said you can believe what you want and you can order me to pay. But that doesn't make it true. Everyone in the courtroom gasped. The judge told me I had 2 options. Admit I signed it or he was going to sentence me to 90 days in jail on contempt of court.
What was your attorney's advice? I'm sure it wouldn't have been to act in contempt of court.
Story that never happened.
@@OR2891 I didn't have an attorney. It was in small claims. I represented myself.
@@MrOoglebog I assure you it did.
it shouldnt have been a criminal offense, they upgrade it to have a higher fine, but, if they are going to make it criminal, the rules of courtroom procedure and how the charge is handled changes completely from a misdemeanor. once it becomes criminal the prosecution is required to produce a victim and PROVE damages, they dont' have to do this when it is a simple misdemeanor, but when it becomes a criminal case EVERYTHING changes. What most people are missing here is a lack of education in the justice system and the rules that apply concerning criminal cases, most here think that the judge has unbridled and absolutely authority in a case like this and she doesn't, when a case becomes a criminal charge the defendant has a right to a jury trial, not a bench trial, which occurs for simple traffic violations, the JURY is the one who decides a defendants guilt or innocense, the purpose of the judge is to make sure the defendant's rights are not violated and the attorney's on both sides don't try to operate outside of the law and rules of courtroom procedure, this guy was absolutely right in all he said and did, the sad thing is that the rights of the populous are being violated to such a degree that society is not only getting used to it, but actually thinks it is normal, that is what you are seeing in this case. The defendant has every right to have the court explain the nature of the charges and have the court prove jurisdiction, the defendant has a right to question the charges made against him and the JUDGE is NOT the ruling authority, the JUDGE is supposed to only oversee that courtroom procedure is followed. these JUDGES are overstepping the bounds of the law when they believe they are judge, jury, and executioner, they are supposed to be NEUTRAL but they are not and are really supposed to make sure the defendants rights are not violated and they ARE supposed to explain the rights the defendant has and as I said, make sure they are not violated. A judge is not supposed to have any bias in a case at all but judges nowadays consider you guilty from the time you walk in the door absent of proof from the prosecution. AS ILLOGICAL AS IT MAY SEEM TO YOU, THE GUILT OR INNOCENSE OF A DEFENDANT IS IRRELEVANT IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL, THE ONLY RELEVANCE IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL IS WHETHER THE COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY AND JURISDICTION TO OVERSEE THE TRIAL AND IF THE PROSECUTION CAN PROVE THEIR CASE. I tool law for a year before I realized america does not have a justice system, only a LEGAL system, that is why many guilty defendants go free and many innocents are found guilty. Like I said, the sad thing here is the ignorance of those who would question the legality of what the man was doing, he was well within his rights to say and do all he did but all the untrained eye sees is someone trying to get out of a ticket and being rude to judge when just the opposite was true, very sad, it was the judge who was out of line and abusing her position.
Truth be told, the court is the victim in a case of direct contempt. And the case does not go to the jury. You don;t know jack. You took law for a year at Ed's Law School.
@Let the truth be told...
While I understand what your saying and can agree with it, there is one part I'm not quite sure about. This video really had nothing to do with the defendants original charge of driving on a suspended license, but rather the charge of being in contempt of court. Being rude and/or sarcastic towards a judge I would think can get you into some hot watet, in this case it got the defendant 15 days in jail! The defendant may have started out by asking legitimate questions regarding his original charge, but when he told the judge that he was in charge of the courtroom and that she was in contempt, well.., that's where he fu**** up. That type of rhetoric is just asking for trouble in my opinion.
your comment shows you don't know jack. there has to be evidence of proveable damages nitwit.
I agree luv, proper courtroom decorum and respect should be shown to judge. the nitwit comment was to the wannabe attorney david. the comment about producing a victim and proving damages I responded to was that of the citation, not contempt of court, also, the court being a victim is laughable.
@@@gladiator8325
LOL! My dad used to call me a nit wit all the time when I was a kid. Now that I'm all grown up and have had the pleasure of being a parent, (sigh) I look back and have to say my dad was right! LOL!! For once it wasn't directed at me though!
I was thinking, one year of Law School may not qualify you to have your own practice, nor would it impress a Harvard professor, but that one year has given you far more knowledge than the average "Joe", David or myself. I don't know why people have to be so pugnacious, society gets no benefit from that kind of behavior at all.
I'm ashamed to admit that I've been arrested a few times... like 5, 6 or 7? I lost count. Some of them were rather serious and of course, I was guilty as charged. However, other than a holding cell until I posted bail or was OR'd, I've never done any time yet I should've.
Case in point: Fourteen years ago in CA I was charged with brandishing a handgun at 2 off duty Officers while in excess of 100mph with my two small children in the back seat, 7 more weapons in the trunk and over $400 worth of "dangerous fireworks" onboard. I had eluded the officers, however I then pulled off the interstate and had lunch at a McDonalds where I was subsequently discovered. For the very first time in my life I was rude and belligerent towards a peace officer. My weapons were confiscated, I wasn't given a receipt nor a citation nor handcuffed or detained. I was told I'd receive a letter notifying me of the date of my arraignment. I retained council to the tune of $15,000 and never went to court on the 3 felonies. One year later my attorney told me I had to choose which charge I would be found guilty of, all knocked down to misdemeanors. I was sentenced to 30 days with an anklet, $100 fine, 3 years probation during which I was to attend 52 parenting classes. I didn't take a single one! I signed up to satisfy the court at the time and the instructor was a total jerk. F*** him! Just before the end of my probation I made my attorney aware of what I hadn't done. Another $2,000 and all was well. Case closed. Yes, I was a fool, a stupid, ignorant, selfish dumbass that should've done some time, however I didn't. That brings me to what you said so, so correctly. "We have a legal system in this country, not a justice system." That is the absolute truth! Just ask myself or O.J. Simpson. Money and a good attorney buys a person freedom and there's no justice in that.
All of this took place in CA about 14 years ago. The law frowned on the combination of guns and children back then, like they still do, but all 7 weapons were returned when the case was closed. Thank goodness, otherwise I'd have retained another attorney My son eventually learned to shoot those guns as well as others when he got a little older, like 8 or 9y/o. UNDER adult supervision, of course. I grew up in a very rural area in SoCal and at 9y/o I had my own .22 rifle. At 13 y/o a 12 guage shotgun and at 18y/o the local D.A. gave me a choice between jail or the service for GTA. So Uncle Sam presented me with a brand new , slightly used, metal and plastic black M-16 and s jeep. I wasn't allowed to keep either though. ;) I think part of the reason the court showed me leniency was because I'd just become a widower only 6 months prior to the crime. My 33y/o wiife had committed suicide leaving me and our 3 & 5 y/o children. By the time probation ended I had both kids attending a top notch, $10,000+_yr private academy where they wore uniforms and I had to drop them off, pick them up, pack their lunches and physically go over their homework every night. My kids were straight A students, had perfect attendence and were doing simple Geometry and Algebra by the 4th grade. Tell me that isn't a real live parenting class! That's why I never attended the court mandated one. I could've been found in contempt of court I suppose. Also, I'd previously spent 9 years in the USMC, received 3 Honorable Discharges and was part of Desert Shield & Desert Storm in Saudia Arabia & Iraq. My service record was/is exemplary. I think those factors may have helped me, but what about society? A combat vet, suffering from PTSD, caught speeding down the freeway pointing a gun at two morons that had badges ( and they were exactly that) while being armed and ready to confront the Republican Guard again if necessary shortly after losing his wife of 16 years! Damn, put like that I'm scaring myself! Bellevue, here I come!
It's said that with age comes wisdom and maturity, I'm still looking for both! ;) I no longer drive a vehicle that I'd consider driving over 100mph. Instead I drive a 3/4 ton crew cab with an 18" lift and 46" tires that'll squash any import (or police car). I still carry a weapon, just one though, legally of course. I sold my house in CA, moved to another state and have no regrets doing so! At 53 y/o I'm retired, own my own home outright on 5 acres and can come and go wherever I want, when I want. I've since replaced the children with a female pit bull and (replaced the first wife)* with two more. However, the bad news is that before I turned 45 y/o I'd buried all three wives. The good news is... I'm not a suspect! LOL! No, there is no good news when burying a loved one. Three seperate incidents all unrelated, leaving behind 3 sets of grieving parents, a total of 6 children, a couple of ex husbands and me. Sometimes I think maybe the good Lord saw fit to give me a break in my legal matters, but punished me in my marital relationships. My last wife and I were only married 63 days. It isn't fair. Not only was I devastated upon getting the news, but my children had now lost 3 frickin' wonderful moms! Three of the best women a man could ever hope to meet! To me, Hell on Earth is watching your children in mental agony and as a parent there's nothing you can do to ease their suffering. THAT is Hell. If there was ever a good reason to go bonkers down a CA highway in excess of 100mph, that would be a good one. However, I'm tired of handing money out to attorneys and making them rich. Also I love my freedom and it would be reckless of me to put innocent people's lives in danger, possibly causing the very thing that my children and I went through three different times. Ha! There's that wisdom & maturity! LOL! Finally! ;)
You Sir, or Ma'am, have yourself a wonderful day! I've texted your ear off and my finger to the bone while ranting and reminiscing! Thank you for the insight into a court room although I plan on never seeing the inside of one as a defendant ever again! ...but then, who actually plans on doing that? ;)
Ciao!
* "...replaced the first wife..."
There's no such thing as replacing a wife. A wife is a human being, an individual, not an appliance from the local Sears store!
When I wrote that it was just an easier way for me to make my point, is all. So for all you haters out there that want to rip me a new one for saying that or anything else I wrote, just don't. I have enough guilt to carry around as it is without spiteful idiots adding hatred to my burden!
He got exactly what he was asking for. You think you know the law because you read some B.S books and then get pissed when yall get called out on it
penis
@Scott Jacobsen How exactly am I part of the problem. Because I don't go and make a fool of my self, push the law and show disrespect to people. Ya'll think being confrontational is the answer to everything. So please explain How exactly I am part of the problem
@Scott Jacobsen you still have yet to tell me how I am part of the problem.To go into a court room and tell the Judge that it's not her court room was stupid. Just shows how arrogant people get when they think they now the law and let it get to there head. he was not there for a hearing, he was there to say his plea and get a court date. so he did not know the law and saw a cell block
@@TheCWARREN23 You're just another STUPID clown. SIGH….No debate me....
@Mendoza Juan first off Juan, I for one dont get brought in front of judges for being stupid. 2. know why your there. He was not there for his day in court. he was there to find out when his day I court was. You act a fool, get treated like a fool. Be smart about what your doing. I am all for protecting you rights, But you have to know when the time to fight is and be properly prepared. He did not k ow when the time was, and was prepared like a fool.
What a waist of my time ... if everyone acted as this gentleman did we would have an even higher court backlog than we already do. Do you realize that we all pay for these institutions to operate? These are not buildings staffed with people for the pure entertainment for people with a chip on their shoulders.
Your waist is where your navel is; W-a-s-t-e is the spelling of the word you wanted to use.
Youre a fucking moron. I hope one day you fet convicted of a crime you didnt so and judge sentences you to life in prison. You fucking moron.
Clear display of power abused.
He was driving withouth a licence. He broke the law ffs
He was traveling not driving dummy
if he was not driving for profit,cab driver,delivery driver,than he was not required to have a driver's license.he is a traveler.their is,and has never been a law stating drivers license is required to operate a mother vehicle.what was he pulled over for. it is our constitutional right to travel un molested by law enforcement or any other agencies.he broke no law.the judge did.also she blatantly disregarded the Constitution that she was sworn in to uphold.she is a disgrace
Norman Nichols im totally into all this shit if really gets me thinking. But you and me both know dosent matter how true that statement is it will get you NO WHERE. Other than adults bitching like children. Thats all ive seen so far.
If not driving commercially you dont need a licence. read the federal laws
Give me your papers, I must have your papers or we will take you to GISTAPO HQ.
So go in her courtroom and tell her she’s in contempt you yapping small dog. Dude was driving with suspended license, that’s illegal, it ain’t a constitutional issue.
James Crane Jr. Define a drivers licence for me please?
James Crane Jr. Hey Big dog answer some questions :)
With all due respect sir but are you nuts?? Of course the judge is always in charge!! That sir is the law!! If the nut driving with a suspended license had not done so then, guess what?? He wouldn't be in her court!! If you think he is right then your wrong too.Case closed.
Well if you here him you would think different so stfh
He was wrongly convicted and was over powered by her lust of corrupted power, the justice system is corrupted and if you dont think so well my friend, i guess when you get wrongly convicted dont cry when that hammer drops on your balls and you get caught up in the corrupted system
And if you dont get caught up in it and you dont realize the truth of it, then your just a blind fool
They both made a MOCKERY of the JUSTICE SYSTEM...BOTH OF THEM!
Homeboy should keep quiet and file a lawsuit against the judge after cause, you will never win a judge in their courtroom.
It is not their courtroom, the court and its chambers belong to the citizens that pay for them!
@@lillianpalmer6554 ofcourse but the judge is appointed to run the room. So who at the time is going to tell the judge otherwise?
The 'judge' is given authority to preside over a court of law. This is NOT a court of law. A court of law deals with crime and is a court of record with a jury of the defendants' peers. This court is none of those things so she is 'running' a fraudulent racket and should be in jail! This man told the judge otherwise and he challenged her jurisdiction which she was unable to prove - no victim, no crime, no law!
@@mcruz4467 Run it, not own it...big difference.
Just say not guilty. Jeez! Would had his day in court to prove his innocence.
He got the normal reaction to SovCit nonsense.
Come on do you see what being disrespectful brings you.. Jail time it brings you jail time .. If one of you're employee ( if you had any ) talk that way to you ... You would fire them...
kitty s No, only a tortured soul thinks their employees are subjects. I had people work for me, they're in put was appreciated.
kitty s we are citizens not an employee that can be gotten rid of because you dont like them, what you speak of is literal corruption and abuse of power. We are the ones supposed to hold the power not dumb power hungry cops
kitty s she's a public servant she's our employee you moron
He was in contempt. He interrupted her and he failed to realize that a court is run very differently than your rights outside a courtroom