Crazy Vegas Judge Loses it when he won’t Worship Her!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июн 2017
- Here come the pretend patriots to loyally defend their fascist State. Follow my friend Josh here... / @joshuamartinez4553
Yes those are pink chains. Some vegas judges are even past adult performers. Ann Elworth locked Josh in the back room because he asked her questions. After a while, she brings him back and gives him an arbitrary sentence with no trial or appeal.
Follow Josh: / @joshuamartinez4553
these judges have too much power. She sends him away for two weeks in jail because she did not like his attitude or what he said. It's sickening when you think about the other ramifications of her sentence. What about his job, loss of income,family while he is sent to jail for two weeks.....she does not care one bit and neither do the rest of people in the criminal justice system. As long as tyrants get their overpaid checks off the misery of others it's ok.
HE WAS TALKING OVER HER IN HER COURTROOM HER COURTROOM NOT HIS. I WOULD HAVE FOUND HIM IN CONTEMPT TOO YOU PEOPLE ARE ALL INSANE TO THINK UOU CAN WALK INTO A COUTROOM AND TALK OVER THE JUDGE. TO BAD SHE WASNT A MALE JUDGE CUZ HE WOULD HAVE BEEN JUST AS HARSH MAYBE MORE. AND IF YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT MISSING OUT ON WORK, CARETAKING A FAMILY OR WHATEVER CUZ YOURE IN JAIL DONT DISRESPECT Judges in their own courtrooms and learn the rules of court.
You can’t tell a judge you run her courtroom.
@@kendrakinard7580 SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT EXPOSE THE SCAM
Clearfield Trust Co. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363 (1942) [APPENDIX A]
In 1942 the Supreme Court made a decision that exposed the corporate government. It resulted in what is now
called the Clearfield Doctrine.
Summary of the Clearfield Doctrine
As all of our government "entities" (listed on Dun and Bradstreet) are doing business using private commercial
paper (the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE), they have no more rights or privileges than any other corporation.
Because of the private currency we are all forced to use called the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE, our so-called
government has lost its sovereignty and has become no different than a mere private corporation. As such,
government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private corporations. Therefore, if they intend
to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon their corporate statutes or rules, then they, like
any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement between it
and the one upon who demands for specific performance is made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial agreement into evidence before
trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called statutes. Without the contract, enforcement cannot take place
lawfully . . . unless you consent.
Bond vs. UNITED STATES 529 US 334 (2000) [APPENDIX B]
In 2000 the Supreme Court held that the American people are in fact sovereign and not the STATES or the
government. The court went on to define that local state and federal law enforcement officers were committing
unlawful action against the sovereign people by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their
actions.
The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, state legislatures, city councils,
municipalities and all state and federal courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of
government. All laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public
law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Since these government bodies are not sovereign,
they cannot promulgate or enforce criminal laws. Corporate 'governments' can only create and enforce civil laws,
which are bound to comply with the Law of Contracts.
@@sandragasman901you really missed the point . And I definitely am not gonna try and cut thru all your cognitive dissonance.
In short , our courts have become tyrannical .
We had a judge in Florida Florida that was a complete lunatic and sentenced a girl to jail because she was afraid to show up for a domestic violence case.... but I am happy to report she was actually reprimanded and eventually I believe she was thrown off the bench! Thank God because she was completely insane and hated women I worked in the court system in new all about her.
Imagine if Josh was her son, would she treated him like that and having him go to jail just because he doesn't listen to what she said. Probably not! But I wish her kids would have done the same thing to see how will she do to them. I can't believe that people can go to jail when they exercise theirs rights in court.
It should be retitled as a sovereign citizen gets his comeuppance.
I was think the same thing.🤣
May your chains rest lightly upon you.
He never claimed to be a sovereign of his own country. That's a different movement. He was simply exercising his constitutional rights. But I agree with the host of this video that we should not be angry and aggressive towards people like you who disagree with us. I don't say to you "STFU". please feel free to speak your mind but also be willing to listen to reasoned discussion of the contrary.
Lol 😂 ruclips.net/video/iz1y4kFHdiw/видео.html
bootlickers
I knew when he called himself an "Activist" that his point of view is skewed. The dude was driving with a suspended license and was talking over her. The judge acted appropriately.
GBLynden's RC I totally agree! The guy was being disrespectful. There is no way I would speak to a judge in this way. He was a total butthole.
GBLynden's RC No license is regulation. Hovernment has a responsibility to regulate commerce but not rights. Judge is wrong. Needs to read law snd forget statutes which most often are contrary to constitution
rick miller True. Citizen is slave look in blacks law. Free persons are in a different category from doses. You are getting s minute amount of intellict here
"Driving / Driver" is a Commercial activity. Roadsigns are made specifically as a reminder of liability to all who possess access to public Roadways. While a car, truck, motorcycle, boat, airplane are all described as motor vehicles, they are only motor vehicles in Commerce Law, Motor Vehicle Acts. Outside of Commerce, they are cars, trucks, motorcycles, boats and airplanes that are private property, not to be Regulated by Commerce Law and Motor Vehicle Acts. They are private possessions of conveyance, with full Right to Travel over any area of Land, water, and airspace in NorthAmerica. If you remain ignorant, tis all on you. Drivers License, Motorcycle License, Boaters License, Pilots License. Let's talk, seriously. Ask your favorite Lawyer a simple thing... to take a picture of their Lawyers License. Let's see what you bring me.
@rick miller THEY ARE CITIZENS OF GOVERNMENT. ARE YOU ?? Do you have a Signed and Dated Contractual Agreement with a Government,Union,Association,Group,Company? If yes, you are a Citizen. If not, you are a Denizen.
A judge can commit criminal contempt for the court
You’re absolutely right. We need good people everywhere. Let’s expose all the crazy evil doers. This judge needs to be mentally evaluated. Take our power back! Hold evil doers accountable record and post all evil. Expose them!
I been through the court system like there’s no tomorrow 😂
They are not judges they are defacto administrators.
The guy starts talking over the Judge while she is speaking then says he"s in charge of the court ahhh not going to end well for you buddy
researcher 55 actually he said "we" are control meaning the people the american government was created as a dictatorship he was in the right.
Mason Jones actually at 3:04 when Mr Martinez is brought back into court , the Judge clearly states that Mr Martinez said he was in charge of court and she was in contempt then again at 3:46 at this point Mr Martinez does not challenge the Judge ???
researcher 55 if you can go listen he says “we” just because she misconstrued what he said doesn’t make her correct.
DontTreadOnMeXXX he said “we”
DontTreadOnMeXXX i know i think he just wasnt trying to keep instigating the situation the judge was obviously making it personal and forgot about the law
When we trade our freedoms for safety, we end up with neither one. Thomas Jefferson
That is true but dose not apply in this case. We have had our rights stripped after 9/11 and that is what would apply, not a douchebag wanting to drive without a license or insurance.
First of all, it was Benjamin Franklin who made that statement. What he actually said:
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
Second - he wasn’t talking about liberty in the context you are implying. It was in a letter to the Pennsylvania Governor from the Pennsylvania State Assembly regarding taxes on the Penn families land to raise money to defend the frontier during the French/Indian conflicts.
Third - Franklin OWNED two slaves. Jefferson OWNED over 600. These are not the type of men that I look to when I need pointers on Liberty.
Contextomy. Look it up.
How much money do judges pay for courtrooms I'll wait
@Barb Rowley it's not her courtroom and with what you just said is the reason that judges think that way police stations courtrooms all that shit is paid for by the citizens that pay taxes period
Pretty bad example of the point you are trying to make.
look that's disrespect to the judge
I completely agree..
Veronica Webb i agree whit you
total bullshit!
that judge is the one out of line. we give these idiot judges WAY TO MUCH POWER! WAY TO MUCH. THIS GUY IN THE BEGINNING WAS NOT DISPLAYING ANYTHING OUT OF LINE. yea putting someone in jail. and she seriously is the one who needs a mh eval.
she is a disgrace!!!
get her OFF the bench!
omg!!!
Lawfully the judge is not out of line. Just because your feelings are hurt doesn't make that change. If you don't like the power that judges or legal representative hold there is a correct way to change it. This moron did not use the correct form. Driving is a privilege, not a right. Nowhere in the constitution does it say you have the right to jump in a motorized vehicle and do whatever crap you want. Traveling is a right, but that includes two feet and a heartbeat not a piece of the motorized machinery. I may not like this judges attitude or the way she handled things, but lawfully it is her right to do so as it's set right now.
This is normal in Las Vegas and My story of what happened to me on multiple occasions, between the police and judges makes this look like nothing. It was bad enough for me to leave the US permanently. Good luck with your corrupt and unprofessional system.
If he knows the law so much he should know its the law to have a valid license 😂
I ABSOLUTELY concur with the judge. The poster of this video (Josh) represents a demographic of scofflaws in this country that has little to no respect for the rule of law. I wish I were a judge and he (Josh) comes before me. I would throw the book of him.
thats false imprisonment!....and someone needs to take her off that court room put her back in her liveing room that she does own hahahaha
Where is Due process for the contempt of court then there wasnt any that is clear
Ignore the troll...tamedawg...paid shill (rejected LEO).
The discretion permitted to judges in determining what is contempt and how to punish it has led some legal scholars to argue that the contempt power gives too much authority to judges. Earl C. Dudley, University of Virginia law professor, wrote that in the contempt power, "the roles of victim, prosecutor and judge are dangerously commingled." I am aware but more people need to know about how Due process that is completely ignored. This is one more way the legal system is broke. It is unconstitutional there for not enforceable by a judge as they take an oath to the constitution.
Lol she isn’t sweating I can promise that😂 if any punishment has been done for what she did then I would be amazingly surprised.
Shes always...always on the rag...with fumes...
Power corrupts...absolute power corrupts absolutely.
No, these people are perverts from the very beginning. There is a perverts' power network. They're probably stealing people's kids and passing them to the paedos in exchange for cash and favours.
@@bashisobsolete.pythonismyn6321 "Stupid boy"
No one in the court had absolute power.
So you’re saying she’s as good as Superman. Got it.
One time someone made up a fake contract and signed my name to it. I told the judge I never signed it and honestly never did. The judge said I owed the money and didn't believe me that I didn't sign it. I looked at the judge and said you can believe what you want and you can order me to pay. But that doesn't make it true. Everyone in the courtroom gasped. The judge told me I had 2 options. Admit I signed it or he was going to sentence me to 90 days in jail on contempt of court.
What was your attorney's advice? I'm sure it wouldn't have been to act in contempt of court.
Story that never happened.
@@OR2891 I didn't have an attorney. It was in small claims. I represented myself.
@@MrOoglebog I assure you it did.
Land of the free is a myth
So is home of the brave, if so many were brave the corporate govt would not exist because the militia would've taken them out by force long ago
Chris Manley - Exactly.
Four more idiots to add to the Christmas list. Hay, the line is very short if you want to leave, I do not think many would cry if you left.
mike53153
Exactly, either you accept all the bullshit and take it like a man if you want to stay or live. The choice is yours, so stop crying like a baby 🤣🤣
Chris Manley Survival of the fittest: The prisoners Bible. By Chief Shuaib Y. Israel. Google The book! FACE THE Music!
If a man can't pay child support. He goes to jail.meanwhile our government doesn't pay back any money it owes.let that sink in..
If a man decides to take drug(s), risk his own body. Goverment steps in. You know why? You aint free, they own your sorry ass body. GET THAT? More then 50% of people in jail is non-violence drug addicts. They threat them as criminals, while it's obvious it's a mental health problem.
This is the world we live in, this is what they call justice. They thought me to respect the police but how the fuck can I respect this shit? It's impossible. Yes, we need police.. No, they aint doing their job they are PISSING on us 24/7 and because we got ALOOOOT of braindead neighbors, they can do whatever the FUCK they want.
Doe Mea T if they wanna use drugs and die then so be it.
Doe Mea T let them do so
yup
Oh I agree, Her court room is as fake as the paper gold she wants. If you aint learn to hate them mfr on paper your gunna get steamrolled. Believe me, i just slammed a state trooper with a public pretender who didnt do nothing but beg me to plea out. That mf'r can prononce death but couldnt tell the difference between a motorcycle + a air cooled clutchless scooter. Bet he wont try that bs again. I hate these young evangelical punks with a badge. Law is an idea, not reality
Sorry, but in this instance I'm squarely behind the judge.
He would have had the opportunity to air his grievances at the next hearing date by simply pleading not guilty.
I agree, but what's up with the pink chains?
Than make all lawyers free. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for us but it gets cops off the hook every day.
@@jerrysmith5782 to humiliate him
@@brianMcGranahan0311 court appointed attorney?
Sorry Josh, but you sound like one of those "Social Justice Warriors" Judge was very tolerant and allowed the fellow to interrupt her numerous times. Are you aware Josh that the judge in the courtroom not only has ultimate authority, but if the President himself went into her courtroom, he could not over rule her, she would have authority over him.
The truth is , she can be overruled , that's why there are 3 branches of our government , to oversee each other . This just played out in a courtroom , they drug the judge out of court , tried and convicted her , then had to drag her off to jail , for 6 months . That's just the most recent in the judiciary shakeup happening lately , now Trump is in charge , many have resigned in shame .
@@mikeevans7560 Mike, yes there are the 3 branches of government and that is why one can not intrude on the other without due process. If the President enters the courtroom, he is subject to the head of the court. Just like if he comes before a house or Senate Committee to answer questions-now he may claim Executive Privilege but I'm not certain. For sure, there are a lot of judges who abuse their authority and I'm glad they are being exposed and removed from the bench. Interesting conversation Mike-have a good day.
That is while the President is in the court, but when he leaves the courtroom he assumes his' mantel of authority.
You're an idiot
This guy thinks he's Batman
Wait, he's not
He is Batman
That guy is a clown
EvenStar LoveAnanda . Iv red the constitution so what does that have to do with both the commentator and the defendant being a clown .the guy was clearly in contempt of court . When your in a courtroom there is only one person in charge that's the judge .
H.O FL350
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She was denying him do process so the judge lost jurisdiction over him.
And he took control of the court room.
You are a dumb ass and you don't understand how the law works.
The guy did everything right, but the judge is corrupt.
You Americans are your own worst enemy.
You always argue against your own rights and best interest.
And you have no idea what you have inherited from your founding fathers.
Shame on you ALL.
@Nik Kingman ... That's funny! :))
EvenStar loveAnanda . Please tell me your not a sovereign citizen nut . Iv dealt with a few and the one thing Iv learned was not to wast my time arguing with them . If you can't live by the laws move on . And why is it that most sovereign citizens have past criminal records and they try anything thing they can not to follow are laws . This will be my only time I respond to you no matter what you write so you have a great life and maybe will meet one day when your traveling down one of the roads I patrol . And will see how far you get with I'm not driveing I'm traveling so I don't need a drivers license . Take it easy .
The presence of consequences for these individuals are literally getting away with murder in some cases.
It’s almost like the gentleman in the video also titled this video because it seems clear the Judge wasn’t in the wrong.
The servers don't want to serve .
“My court.” I thought it was the People’s court.
The judge is correct - it is in fact her court
Well if it is her court
And not the peoples court,
Is the same if it is your personal house, I don't wanna go or be at your personal house
@@brownbear9072 If you want to live in America, you follow our Constitution. America does not follow your rules. If you do not want to have a driver's license, then don't drive on our roads.
@@alanmcentee3035
I don't care if you're in america and have a driver license or not
Or you drive the roads in america or not
My comment was about been the peoples court, not her own personal court
You watch too much television. It is the People's Court and she represents the people of the country. That doesn't mean she represents you individually.
You should have learned this in school. Assuming you're not a Russian sock puppet trying to sew discord. (Which is very possible with you're understanding of us legal system)
judge avoided saying mental health for what reason? was this an accusation of having MH problems>?
Of course it was. The jackass was doing the sovereign citizen nonsense and he was clearly in contempt. He’s mentally ill, like all the sovereign citizen morons.
@@MrJamberee This made me laugh because you just called all judges and police officers mentally ill and morons. Cheers 🍻🍻
@@Vermino You seem to have a problem with reading comprehension.
@@Colgate64 I acknowledged your 1st amendment, as you have did mine.
@@Vermino You do understand that the First Amendment is only applicable to government, not private individuals?
Josh gets out august 15th almost almost :(
Minnesota case. I was ordered to Show cause why summary judgment should not be granted, per court order I came and presented evidence, in which judge refused to take and claimed that the court hearing is to show cause why I should not be found in the contempt. I said I do not understand what the judge attempting to order here, when clearly it states show cause why summary judgment should not be granted and that is the reason I am here to do so, due to the fact I have material evidence that shows I was defrauded, misrepresented.
The judge said show cause is the same as show cause, contempt. I said that orders here are two different orders and should be void for vagueness and that I demand a fair trial. I was alleged with contempt of the court. Next morning Judge again demanded to comply with their order, in which I replied that he violated my civil and constitutional rights and without due process. I was sentenced for 180days/6 month, in which later released without an official hearing, no trial.
Next day after I was released, I went to the court. I demanded this case to be tried by Jury and the judge confirmed and made a claim that Jury will be established. I was tricked into a bench trial. No jury was established.
Still fighting this case as a pro se.
Fighters of Rights. Men of God. Keep up the good fight against corruption, injustice, and servants of bad faith.
This guy was warned a few times. Besides that every one in the free world knows driving on a suspended liscence is a crime. Stop being some cry babies and man up when you get caught breaking the law
15 days in jail is a bit over the top though
@@dillydillypickle9620 In the UK it would be six months
Darrell Kimberling
She has a god mentality
I agree that his suspended liscence is a crime and he should have sucked it up but she needs to be held to a higher standard. The way she acts like she physically owns that courtroom is ridiculous
@@naturaltranquillityaudioim1916 but this is America not the UK. we have rights that no one can take away from us . Like him legally asking questions about his own case. He was also representing himself so he needed to ask those questions. The judge was in the wrong
HoneyBadger MalDog. That court room is jers to run just like your house hold is yours to run. You wouldnt let me come in and talk to you anyway i felt and disrespect yiur home. That guy needed to just close his mouth and face the consequences of his actions.
Have you seen the one with the crazy judge being drug out and jailed! She got what was coming to her!
I got locked up for winning a fight that the other guy started with i was guilty of defending myself self.i would have got 2 min in the penality box @ a hockey game i got 60 days for Knocking Out a dude that came @ me.juges will be judged them selfs.
ps now i can't get a job.
ps. I also had 2 pay a lawyer 2500 then go to anger management 800 then 18 months of probation, and a piss test every wk. 25 a week, i wasn't even smoking weed or drinking she the judge took the advice of the da. that i had a past DUI.
Some child molesters don't even get 15 days.
You guys are mixing up the constitution with the law book
I think the blood spilled for the dream was that they should be one and the same 😕
The constitution is law jackass. And non debatable..people like you who take it up the tail pipe are the reason everyone else has to follow suit..
Lmao. This is the single dumbest comment I’ve ever seen. Have you never heard of “constitutional law”?? The constitution is a legal document designed to lay out the MOST important and basis of ALL laws governing this land. What the hell did you think the constitution was? The bill of rights ? What do you think the SUPREME court decides ? They decide if judgements and laws are CONSTITUTIONAL or not and then rule accordingly. The fact that people like you exist is the reason our rights are being stripped away daily. Maybe educate yourself. I can’t imagine being this uneducated on a subject and cocky enough about it to come into a public forum and comment complete nonsense with total confidence. Enjoying your freedoms and rights while pretending they don’t exist. Idiot. Men fought and died for these rights and this level of freedom. I personally served during war. This is unbelievable the amount of people commenting that share this level of ignorance.
I just learned something new today. LOL SMH
Every one needs to start holding all people who think they are above the law and can abuse their power accountable like all of you!
I hope your talking to the judge
There is no law, just enforcement
No matter what, by acting as one humans above other human this is a crime
And for you and you relative I hope tommorow law won't be breathing or talking as you told by this law, bcz if you disagree, you can't be above that law right? sound very common sense?
@@profribasmat217 the 1st ammendent shouldnt have any stature of limitation. And its people like you who willingly take it up the tail pipe that make it so that i have to follow suit...facts
Wait.....so was he driving on a suspended license? Haha I think so.
I'm with you my friend..
This was not the trial. All he had to say was not guilty and then say what's needs to be said at trial. He would have not got locked up. At trial is when you do all the talking. Or ask for dismissal instead of trying to get somewhere when that was not the time to do it
Yeah that SOUNDS good, but that is not the way it really works is it? Just say what needs to be said at trial right? That is part of the scam. I have had more than my share or experience dealing with the legal system, far more than I care to admit. Most people do not have the time to show up to court for an arraignment, then show up for continuance after continuance, missing day after day of work, to finally get to defend themselves. The system is set up like that so you just pay the fine and they get their money.
He is a lawyer, I think he knows what he is doing and talking about.
@@TracyGunz Really? Because it looks like he is defending himself and has a public defender seated next to him..Just saying..ya know the old saying about a person who defends himself has a fool for a client? yeah pretty much. Poor guy didn't stand a chance.
@@axlef1513 Wrong, that is how it works.
If you want to claim the protection of our Constitution then you also have to accept the responsibilities of that Constitution. That includes the part where the courts get to decide the law and settle disputes between citizens and between citizens and their government. You do not get to cherry pick only the parts you like.
Remember, if you do not like our social order then no one is preventing you from leaving. I understand Somalia has lots of beach front property available with no taxes or gun laws. They also don't have any courts or police. Or government, unless you consider the warlord with the most guns the government.
It will never be a real trial as a trial is criminal matter all he's broken a policy he has not consented to.
I have some experience with courts and that is clearly contempt of court. The judge conducts the proceedings of the court and not the accused or their lawyers. The judge doesn’t need to answer any questions of the accused.
If the accused doesn't want to answer questions then they say 'no comment' or something to that effect and then they keep their mouth shut. They don't repeatedly try and take over the proceedings. This judge was good. The contempt of court was justified.
DarkLight753 Absolutely.
If I talked stupid and rude in a court ,I'd expect slammer time . His parents never checked his manners as a kid .They're as bad as him .
Don't ever go beyond that witness bench.
Josh was his own worst enemy here.
these people complain a lot for someone who lacks ....tact.... a basic adult reasoning tool to deescalate and correlate in adult conversation. wow.
deuce - he was ignoring and speaking over the judge, what he needed to do was plea innocent then make his case. The questions he was asking had nothing to do with proving him innocent. The guy was driving with a suspended license, i would assume since the video got choppy.
deucedeuce You are wrong about him doing nothing wrong. He said that he was in charge of the court room, that is what he did wrong. You can't say if there is no victim there is no crime. For example... he could have been picked up for drunk driving, there doesn't have to be a victim does there? Same as driving with a suspended license, he broke the law.
deucedeuce22oz , she let him ask questions and she answered them. Its when he said that he controlled the court that he committed contempt. She told him she was charging him with contempt as the Marshal led him into the hall. After that she told him if he apologized she would drop the contempt. He wouldnt so she sentenced him to 15 days. Thats how contempt charges work. They are immediate. Read a friggin law book.
He has the right to ask legal questions in court, only a fucking moron would agree with this judge.
When god ask her questions then let’s see what she does then
There is no god...tooth fairy...Santa...Bigfoot or leprechaun.
which God ??? Budda Visnoo Thor ....
Plus he may have lost his job ruining lives all over this country love my country hate my goverment
We need to stand up as one...
Where did this clown with the goatee go to law school? As for the other clown, he should have hired a lawyer. He go what he deserved.
Umm.. i disagree. Under Corpus Juris Appendum under the subheading "Attorney & Client" it explains attorney's have a dual obligation, and their primary obligation is to the government, not their client. Legally if you hire an attorney you are, by law, a "client" to the court. Consequently a "client" is defined as a "ward of the court". When you look up "ward of the court" in blacks law dictionary it says "a ward of the court is an infant or a person of unsound mind" so by definition, if you hire an attorney, you're of unsound mind.. basically.. saying if you hire an attorney you're an idiot.
Where did YOU go to law school?
Eric Bland Georgetown. Recheck your reply. Just SMH
It was a driving charge. He could stop driving but since it is considered a priveledge, the injured party doesn’t apply. Should people be allowed to drive totally drunk and put everyone at risk if no one calls the cops on them? Sometimes common sense needs to be used
Our friend, Common Sense, died a long time ago. R.I.P.
He kept passing up good opportunities to shut up.
Its not her courtroom it belongs to the people that she is supposed to work for. I don't know why they think they deserve respect, they have done nothing to earn it.
Abraham Lincoln said you give the power to the courts and the people will suffer
masen the cool kid my uncle Luis said that too!
not entirely true, what he actually said was ''We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts''
I heard him say that on the "Bebe kids" movie.
Not the exact quote but he did say... and I quote “Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves; and, under a just God, can not long retain it.”
Lincoln also said "In law it is a good policy to never plead what you need not, lest you oblige yourself to prove what you can not." This video is the example to the fullest...
1 Timothy 2:12
“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.”
Damn straight and a woman will abuse authority and exercise great disrespect towards a man when given such a position... Those sworn by the "Oath" to uphold the Law spit in the face of it and the "Constitution,"
this is why God clearly states the following as in the KJV:
(1) A woman should learn in quietness and full submission.
(2) I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.
(3) For Adam was formed first, then Eve.
(4) And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.
@@thespearodiver No. God doesn't state it. These were both written by Paul. Not God. Not Jesus.
@Robin Justice
Man hater, lmfao!
@Robin Justice
Silence Robin, Silence! 🙊
@Robin Justice
Why don't you go take a powder, preferably arsenic, LOL.
Public court room?
Every judge I have been in front of, about 10, have all totally sucked. Treated me as a rented mule.
Judge seemed fair to me
No way, by the looks of things, she knew that the guy caught her for doing the wrong thing so she got him arrested just to feel better about it. That is really what happened!!
Nothing will change, except the powerful will become more powerful
Honest sad truth
Love that painting.
He still has enter a plea no matter what questions he asks
Yea, what obligates him to "HAVE TO" do a goddamn thing?
@@ItsMeScareCro THE LAW!!!
@@gerardochavez8108 - You mean some human's scribbling on a piece of paper becomes soooo magical it MUST be obeyed? You're a good boy and deserve a bone for your obedience to magic paper and ink. IT'S THE LAW... LMFAO!!!!
And BTW, the guy who posted this video needs a psych evaluation as well.
He needs something. The sad thing is that he does have a bit of a point but the fact that he used this particular case to sound off about completely negates any legit point that he might have had. I knew the secondary that he said "activist" thats this was going to be a cluster.
What a strange fellow the presenter is. People like that who are anal know it alls and argue for thecsake of arguing are oxygen thieves. The guy in court got what he deserved for being a clever bastard. Funny he got got sent to jail for a crime commited at a hearing for another crime, and as soon as he got out he was arrested again for yet another crime. But oh no he is the victim all of a sudden. If he had shot someone would he have still claimed the same? Those crimes says that he is a criminal. It's that simple to me. The weirdo presenter needs a pyshc evaluation for sure!
Nik Kingman official eval or common sense eval?
Sarad Thamia both!
That and he needs to pick up a law book. He’s out of his mind.
It's the judges courtroom.. that's why they're called a judge... Selected by our Congress.. truly the jury is in charge of a certain case but when you break the law, you get made an example of.. that's how it works. Stop whining and obey the law and there won't be a problem. Don't start no shit, won't be none.
*judge's
Joseph Naron this judge was elected
But he was in the wrong tho. He has an suspended license. What did you expect.
America is only a country to native Americans, otherwise it's a corporation. United States For America, not "Of."
Totally stolen comment, i seen it elsewhere
@@ianfixter2881 HAHAHAAHA!
she dont get to deside the manner the manner is set out under the law
She was in compliance with the law -- he was not.
That's a lovely painting in the background.
Absolutely, draws you into the center with a myriad of colours and depth, Bow to my authoritie.. Peasant
I think the judge gave him ample opportunities to not get himself locked up. First warnings was being sent to the holding tank. Even after he came back in the judge practically begged him to apologise repeatedly and he didn’t so he got himself locked up. You where already charged with driving with a suspended license so it’s an open n shut case. But this idiot went n got himself locked up. I thought the judge showed patience with him n gave him ample times to apologise. But saying that he is in fact in charge of the court is ridiculous.
degree7 yup
The inside of a holding tank? No thank you.
She'd love a Moor.
Anyone else like the painting on backround
Mee!! I loved it. I think I am gonna try to paint it myself. It is a beautiful scenery.
@@harleenkaur8122 that would be great
Yes
thats a genuine BOB ROSS piece of art !!!!! check him out !!
The city is the injured party?🤔
No. Just no.
sure they are... they all pay for their license, why should he be special and not have to have one.
@@smokinjoe4709
The city pays for licenses?
He said we lmao
Excuse me? I thought it was the people's court.
Oh, so he thought that it was HIS courtroom, and she was in contempt. All I saw was his unbelievable arrogance talking over her. He’s lucky he only got 15 days.
He said OUR courtroom... the judge was partial and that's enough for a mistrial
Agree 100%!
EXACTLY
Why not plead NOT guilty and wait to present your case?
Because he stood up for himself, unlike most "Sheep" in America....
Plead guilty to what... when charged with a crime, you have a right to face your accuser... a right to an attorney... etc... none of that was going on... the state was simply trying to generate revenue out of the populace.
@@rurome2151 You have the right to know the charge, If he claimed the charge was ambiguous, unknown, or unconstitutional, he should have challenged the jurisdiction of the court. He didn't. The judge is under no obligation to explain the charge.
The only time the police must advise you of your right to a lawyer is if they intend on questioning you. He was not arrested.
There was no trial. This was an arraignment , an administrative function for the court to claim jurisdiction over the offense and the party. The accuser need not be present for an administrative procedure.
Whether the State was just trying to get revenue is irrelevant to the discussion. He was in direct contempt and is being punished for it.
That is what he was supposed to do.
@@alanmcentee3035 The charge was driving on a suspended license.
That is why she is still in traffic court, she is considered a lame judge by her own.
using that logic, thats why hes in court (on the wrong side of it) to begin with, cause hes a fucking idiot that deserves to be there.
she sent him away, took no time out of her day. im sure she drove home just fine that night and enjoyed a nice evening at home while he was in jail hashing out the definition of what victim is in the courts eyes.
I am so glad you are pointing this type of crime out. The way they act in the courtrooms put fear in people and make them not question them. Thank you for pointing out exactly what is wrong with our justice system.
Lol
There are many examples online of judges with egregious behavior. This video is a poor example, and undermines the point you are trying to make. Is that what you want? It sounds like you were 😭 butt hurt over a personal account and now obsess about judges PERIOD. Deal with it bro and move on. Actually, you do sound like a petty, vindictive person. Not the judge. It’s time for you to hold yourself accountable for the junk you upload.
Dr. Lori Smith 1mil viewers watched this junk 😂
dr. lori smith, a little bit of education of what constitutional rights we have and what purpose a judge serves in a criminal case would be good.
Demanding an apology or sentencing the man to 15 days in jail and then sentences him to a mental health evaluation without an opportunity to answer the charge? The poster might be everything you describe, I wouldn't know, however the judges behavior is very appalling.
Appalling or not, morally reprehensible or not, it is her lawful right to do this. Do I agree with it? No I don't think if you are being contemptuous of a judge that the very same Judge should be able to decide it arbitrarily without consulting an outside source on the matter. I mean there's no appeal, no way to argue your position without making the situation worse, and no way to right a wrong if there has been one. As the laws are written right now that is it, what the judge says goes, set in stone.
I wish this guy would have posted a link in the description below to a petition advocating change rather than doing what he did. I hope if someone does this in the future that the video gives a better example then the one he manufactured/instigated. At least then maybe some changes could be made to make the process a lot more fair for those standing before a judge who is either arrogant or had an extremely bad day and is taking it out on the people in front of them.
This whole video is a waste of time and shows that Joshua is an asshole. He was driving on a suspended license. Instead of playing word games with the court he should have paid the fine and went home. You believe that it's wrong to make people pay money for a plastic card that allows you to drive in Vegas? Don't drive in Vegas. Simple huh?
All of Joshua's legalese and double speak means nothing. If Joshua were to win his case it would set a precedent . Other people addressing the court with the same infraction would be able to say "Your Honor, what about case number 12378...City of Las Vegas v. Douchebag? The defendant in that case didn't need a drivers license, why do I"?
So gavin is never going to win.
If you believe that a license isn't necessary to drive a car then work to have the law changed.
I hate our criminal courts. I am not a big fan of the police. BUT, this situation is not a good example of the abuses some judges commit. There are procedures that everyone must follow in court, and you must respect the court. If the judge says quiet - then you be quiet. Too many "activists" think breaking the law is permissible when they feel a judge or authority figure has done so - not true. The higher court is where you bring that grievance and let them decide. The man should have taken it to the higher court that he felt this court should not be able to decide his guilt or innocence, and you do so AFTER this court has done that. During the procedure, you do not talk over the judge, disrespect the court - or, basically, commit contempt of court, which is what you are doing when you do those things.
It is the equivalent of fighting a cop when you believe the arrest to be unlawful. The law doesn't say it is ok to assault a police officer because you think you are being wrongfully arrested. Whenever you believe your civil rights have been violated, your recourse is to take them to court - Your recourse is not to assault anyone, or commit another crime. It is the same as the idiot activists who say "You don't have the right to ask me that!" A police officer has the right to ask you anything they want, even ask for id, YOU have the right to refuse. I think 15 days is a little steep for talking out of turn, but other than that, this judge was not abusing her power. It is her job to make sure the court remains orderly.
The law is a bunch of words on a piece of paper, which constitute an opinion with an agenda. Saying the law is being broken all depends on who's breaking it and under what circumstances, isn't it?
Actually, in Nevada there is not Nevada statue that says you “open carry” legally, there’s also, no statue that says you can’t open carry. It’s at the Officers’ discretion. I’ve checked. Called the Nevada AG and couldn’t get a clear answer. So either get a ccw or don’t carry because you will be scrutinized.
Is this judge still on the bench?
So wrong,,,,,, wOwwwww
Jeffrey Anderson hey dummy the judge rules the court go to law school then make a statement
If youre licence was suspended, I don't want you on the road either.
You think you are sharing a display of injustice, but this video just further discredits you
monty fresh licenses are only a legality which can be suspended for pissy civil crap like unpaid fines, therefore making them irrelevant to proving driver safety and skill. So by extension you're saying all because someone didn't or couldn't afford to pay a bullshit fine, they shouldn't be allowed to drive on the road? Are we so chauvinistically high and mighty, maybe you should wear a suit and look the part too. Careful your neck doesn't cramp holding that nose so high in the air 😂
Merv Griffin you don't know the circumstances... you have to draw the line somewhere. If he had an issue with an unfair ticket, he would have been disputing the ticket.
Merv Griffin your attempt in trying to sound clever is pathetic. Why are you even taking it personal. It takes a lot to get your licence suspended, it doesnt just happen for no reason. How many times have you been unjustly caught for driving on a suspended license? I havn' t. Not only did he get his licence suspended, but he got pulled over because he was driving with such skill and safety.
his suspended licence is not the point of this video!
If you had any common sense Monty fresh you would realize that people should not even need to have a license at all to travel freely within this country. Second of all, if you had any common sense you would also realize that they are suspending peoples licenses so that they can extort people out of money unlawfully through means of fraud and tyranny.
It is a human right to be able to travel freely around this country so that we can go to the store and buy medications, food and other supplies. They have conned people into thinking that driving is a privileged instead of a natural human right and you are a damn traitor to all Americans with your corrupted and twisted thinking that shows that you want to be a boot licker to tyrants. Most normal Americans who are educated however do not want this for us or our children! Please shut up and sit back down until you educate yourself on human rights and freedom.
He got way to may participation trophies as a child.
She is power hungry and doesn’t care about anything else.
She asserted her authority appropriately.
Whether anyone thinks the judge is corrupt isn't my issue with what happened here. What I see is a citizen being charged with driving on a suspended license then telling a judge she is not in charge of her court room. Are you kidding me????? Last time I checked driving on a suspended license is an offense in any state.
Debra D amazing! You got to the heart of this and I bet you’re not even a lawyer. He deserves every second in custody he got and only himself to blame. These idiots always pull this and always end up in jail or prison.
You guys are both idiots keep bending over for the corrupted I don’t understand what’s wrong with standing up for our rights and to uphold the constitution.
@@madskillzgaming4465 That's right! These people are part of the problem, they've been brainwashed! They will bend over and take it up the arse without lube cuz someone told them its the law! They have no clue about their constitutional rights! When you don't use them, you lose them!
Or country for that matter, nutter tried to be a smartass and got his ass handed to him.
@@america1403 Getting your legal education from RUclips College is not a good idea. Anyone that thinks the moron presenting this video is anywhere near correct, is just asking to end up behind bars for the same reason.
It is her court. She is the boss here. And it is Constitutional.
the city/state can not be a victim because it is not a living being.
Spot on
Actually a person representing the state can be the complainant. So a ticket is a complaint to the state. In my state if the person being abused by their partner refuses to press charges the state can be the complainant and add domestic violence charges to the aggressor.
The city/state is the people that live in it. They are living beings.
@@dd1862 did you hear the judge say "victim has a different *legal* meaning?
The "State" has a different legal meaning than the "people " believe it does. This is why when "the city" owns something, you being a citizen, ie " the city" aren't just allowed to use it freely, such as the roads without a license.
Therefore it is not "the people" as you suggest . It is a *thing* claimed by the people in common ( communism) which you can't use freely. Basically, yes it yours but you can only use it when someone else determines you are fit to use it. Now we can see how the term "big brother" came into being. In the end it is something that belongs to everyone but also no one
These people got balls and I love it...fee America!
No, what they get is ball's slapping against their ass in prison for being stupid.
Come on, spouting nonsense to try and weasel out of a traffic violation? This guy fills half of my Sovereign Citizens bingo card.
I thought that was two paintings behind you, until I seen the leaves blowing!!,😮🤭 Beautiful backyard you have!! Like if you thought the same 😂
Hahaha 😎😷 yeah .. When I read your coment . I paid attention to 🍃 leafs moving
You can be clever all you want and find loopholes but his liscence was suspended for a reason... if he was good to have on the road, he wouldnt have a suspended liscebce lol.
defending your constitutional rights is not a LOOPHOLE.
You know driver liscenes are only for bussinesa right
How would you know ? He was dead before you were born.
Driving with a Suspended License and playing dump. Do your homework before court day. More if is a Monday and is over 100 degrees outside. OBEY state laws.
I am an attorney and I see absolutely nothing wrong with what the Judge did or said. He is in contempt of court. If he doesn't understand court procedure, he should retain counsel. There are rules of court for a reason and he is not, in any way, complying with those rules. He is refusing to answer the court's questions and not giving the court any indication he understands these proceedings.
I have sued 16 Judges in Texas (12 "STATE" and 4 Federal) in the last 14 months, after Judge Andrew Hathcock, and Judge Scott Jenkins, took away my children in court case #: D-1-FM-03-000048, in spite of me committing NO CRIMES, simply because I went public with the TRUE STORY of my black girlfriend (Jenna Lenee Jackson) being RAPED, and sadly tricked into getting an ABORTION, by a PIMP named: Vadik Marmer, who PROUDLY posted a video on Facebook titled: "HOW TO BRAINWASH GIRLS INTO THE BURNING MAN CULT", for the whole world to see. Isn't it funny that I had to file the suits against the Judges "Pro Se" because NO ATTORNEY WOULD HELP ME AS AN INDIGENT PERSON???
Why are they called Honarable, if ya don't even know em;!
Borinstein Springer, LLP contempt of court? What is that ?
Blah blah blah.....Hey sunshine....Anyone can file a lawsuit.
Stop whining and become a productive member of society
Look it up.....Jesus Christ.
here ...chew on this.
And then ask more stupid questions
www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByArticle/Chapter_5A/Article_2.pdf
This right here and the problem with Gavin, is they think they dont have to be accountable for their actions. I'm all for standing up for my rights and standing against abuse of power, but this isnt any of that. This is someone who broke the law and because they dont agree with it, thinks they can act however they want. When we hold our civil leaders and civil employees accountable of the law and want to point out every time they break the law, we also need to respect the law ourselves.
jeffrey thomas all he did was ask legal questions
And laws are made to protect others rights there were no rights violated
Donovan thats what i was saying...that no rights were violated...reading is fundamental.
jeffrey thomas oh sorry think i had a conformation bias with all the comments being the same
He wasn't simply asking legal questions, he was beginning to make a legal argument. That's just wasting everyone's time at an arraignment.
RC Slyman he stayed in the bounds of legal questions it only went off to a legal argument I guess you could call it when she stated its her court and he stated its the peoples court
She was asking for his plea. This was not the argument phase of the case as he was treating it. He couldn’t even get Step 1 correct.
Organize your own ways to fight for justice in what you consider crime. Justice is yours if you believe you are free. You may otherwise become one of the brave.
Homeboy should keep quiet and file a lawsuit against the judge after cause, you will never win a judge in their courtroom.
It is not their courtroom, the court and its chambers belong to the citizens that pay for them!
@@lillianpalmer6554 ofcourse but the judge is appointed to run the room. So who at the time is going to tell the judge otherwise?
The 'judge' is given authority to preside over a court of law. This is NOT a court of law. A court of law deals with crime and is a court of record with a jury of the defendants' peers. This court is none of those things so she is 'running' a fraudulent racket and should be in jail! This man told the judge otherwise and he challenged her jurisdiction which she was unable to prove - no victim, no crime, no law!
@@mcruz4467 Run it, not own it...big difference.
Judge should spend 6 months in jail for kidnapping.
Harry Tzianskis The God of Speed Are we still burning witches at the stake?
if thats what it takes to get things right then let it be
The Judge did no wrong and in her courtroom, the judge is perfect and can do no wrong on the other hand the woman ACTING as Judge could do wrong BUT the problem is the one appearing Doesn't Know who he is and what is the Status of the DEFENDANT and Jurisdiction of the court, etc.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse... what law? who's law? who or what is the DEFENDANT?
These are quasi private administrative tribunals - Not Constitutional Courts.
Vital Rights GO FUCK YOUR SELF TROLL
Ha ha ha. Just another example of sovereign bullshit getting owned in court. I think the 15 days was a bit steep, but sovereigns always lose, unless a judge takes pity on them.
Retired California lawyer, retired Oregon judge here. When I ask you for a plea during your arraignment, I expect to hear "guilty" or "not guilty" or "no contest" (I never got to hear "not guilty by reason of insanity.") I have the authority to enter a "not guilty" plea on your behalf and set the matter for trial. I am generally not in the mood for extensive conversation, because I have other matters on the calendar. I have no problem with the way the judge handled the situation in this video.
Well i guess you should have chose a different profession.
The fact that someone might get locked in a box because of your mood shows that there is a problem with the system.
The result of the "everyone gets a gold star" generation in full effect.
Karen, guess who was handing out those gold stars. Not the generation receiving them. The generation receiving them did not want them because they do not mean anything. we've got that? Okay good deal. :-)
@@legalfictionnaturalfact3969 wow. Good point
It’s weird how boomers always complain about shit like this when they were the ones to give us those stars. I remember getting them and I also remember not giving a shit about it either lmao