I drove wheezy 4 cylinder cars all my life because I hate debt and I hate car payments and so does my wife. Since 2018 we've been saving up for a new car and got a CX-90 with the less powerful engine and it's wonderful. I know it's not a 911 turbo but compared to what we had both been driving since we were in high school it's smooth like butter and just takes off when you put your foot down. Unless you need to tow I can't imagine somebody not being satisfied with the base engine.
I have no need for a 3 row so I'm more interested in seeing the CX-70, but the enthusiast in me hopes they put this engine/transmission combo in a sedan (or better yet a wagon)!
Rumour has it that the CX 70 will be a CX 90 with five seats, not a smaller vehicle like the CX 60. Could this be a mistake made by Mazda? Cancel the CX 70, import the CX 60! Good review.
What I really hope is that the CX70 is to the CX90 what the Honda Passport is to the Pilot. I love my Passport, but if they really a Mazda equivalent I’d strongly consider it. I think the Passport is a brilliant Goldilocks vehicle in having room vs being compact, as well as being decent on the road vs being able to handle some rougher stuff. Don’t need an off roader, just something for beat to hell forest roads I’d REALLY consider it if they offered a CX70 that is a little more ruggedized (more ground clearance, higher volume tires, etc).
Wow..first real review I've watched with true candor on a car's performance. Great job guys. I liked the real world application on the body roll when turning. I was debating on whether the GTP was that much better than the GT and this review sorts it out. Not much besides the HP difference and families aren't really racing SUVs.
The US Turbo Premium Plus 280 hp has many more features than the Canadian GT version like, ventilated and heated front seats, the 12.3-inch digital gauge screen and the 12.3-inch dash screen, 360 cameras to name a few.
Someone buying lower trims are a bit more conscious of spending money on things like digital dash, power folding mirrors, etc. Just something that you'd dread having to pay to replace out of warranty. GT trim seems like it's the sweet spot for Canada. I think I prefer the rims on the GT over black painted, machined face type on higher trims.
Nice review folks, beautiful vehicle. I love the instrument cluster with minimum screen even for HVAC buttons. Great job Mazda, you guys are on a roll one hit after another. This vehicle beats any overpriced Honda.
It cx30 slides all of the road anywhich way possible not enough weigh to the vehicular to be able to ride a snowy slushy round even high was I was almost killed by a tractor trailer
It looks like every single reviewer I've watched has issue with the suspension, transmission and comfort, like they all say, its very responsive and handles very well but not as comfortable as it's competitors. Definitely not going this direction until Mazda figures it out
I turned off the auto stop/start on our Audi's via the OBD2 port. I wonder if the Mazda dealer can disable that function. Thanks for reviewing the standard 3.3T GT trim. That's what I am considering.
Great video! My first time on the channel. Just wanted to add a comment about the trim levels available to us in Canada for the CX-90 as opposed to the trims available in the US. I really wish we had one more trim in between the GT and the GT-P such as the Kuro. I would love to have the base engine with a few more options. Bring back the polymetal grey colour and the blacked out rims. I would love the option for the wine red seats as well as ventilated seats in the front. All of these extra options would be great for a family that doesn't need a high output engine that recommends premium fuel. I believe Mazda USA offers this with the Turbo Premium Plus trim (minus the wheels and seat colour). Thanks again for the great video!
The Platinum Quart Metallic, my favorite new color choice! I wish it was offered in other Mazda models. Leather seats are overrated; velour cloth seats should be an option.
Very nice review with unique insight! It looks like you can control the second row HVAC from the front, which would be great! Can you make any comment on how the power feel compared to the CX-9?
Thanks for your kind words! The CX-9 feels similarly powered, but it’s also got a smaller engine with less to move, so it makes sense that it balances out. Hope that helps! And thanks again for watching!
@@Modern.Motoring Unfortunately in the States parking sensors and 2nd row bench are only offered on the base Turbo S, the trim has limited color options. So either white or platinum.
I'd call front double wishbone suspension as pretty fancy (though it isn't adaptive, so maybe that's what you're alluding too.) The number of 3-row SUVs with double wishbone is pretty small (Acura MDX, anyone else?)
My issue is that you can't get all the features of the top inline 6 trims in this engine. I still want vented seats, HUD, the nicer tail lights/headlights, 360 cam whatever is missing, I don't have the option page next to me but this GT is missing quite a bit. Why do brands keep trying to reinvent the shifter? I have Acura and Mazda in the driveway, and I love the fact my Mazda, the least sporty and luxury of the 2 has a good ole fashioned shifter. I feel like I'm driving the Mazda, whereas the Acura feels like a video game with button shifters...and it's a Type S!
I test drove the cx 90 the other day and really wanted to love it and buy it...but the stutter was noticeable every stop and go we had...the seats were beautiful, but not comfortable...i was thinking it would feel silky smooth and float down the road...but it wasn't as nice as i was hoping...I also test drove a Santa Fe, Palisade, and pilot...the Santa Fe's were AMAZING!! I was in total shock...super responsive and the SILKY smooth...I'm still in shock...and the Palisade...WOW! Pilot is way too loose with the steering...The cx 90 was responsive and was smooth once you got moving, but it just wasn't what I thought it would be. The seats...Hyundai had the most comfortable seats...I didn't think the cx 90 was terrible but I was ready to get out of the seats pretty quick..I felt I could have driven the Hyundai's for 1000 miles. Writing this I'm still shocked...I can't lie about it...Space...the Santa Fe, Palisade, and Pilot were much more spacious. I'm hoping mazda listens to some of the criticisms and make some changes. Still a beautiful car, but with the DCT transmission, uncomfortable seats, and minimal cargo, and that stutter, just wasn't for me.
I hate that they made the lower trims with analog gauge cluster and you have to go higher in trim for the digital. Why do that? On every other vehicle I’ve test driven what ever gauge cluster is available is standard period with the only difference maybe being driving modes/color changes.
Would have loved to see a traditional engine/transmission in the lower trim models.. The CX-9s torque convertered 6spd auto was so tractable at low speeds/real world driving, and just falls away to do it's job, unnoticed. Hopefully Mazda can make some software updates to smooth things out.
@@yournightmare9999 Every road test is complaining about shuddering, and slow engagement during launch. Mazda is a small company that can't afford a reliability issue (even perceived).
@@yournightmare9999 Exactly the reason I'm worried they have switched from a bulletproof conventional automatic to a new design without a torque converter. I'm all in on Mazda, but a big part of that for me is that they keep their designs simple and refine over many years.
With the market being what it is these days, almost everything needs to be ordered. Best to check with your local dealer if you’re looking for lot inventory. We can’t comment on whether dealers are marking up except to say it’s not as common in Canada but it does happen, so it’s best to arrive to your negotiations prepared. Hope that helps.
@Modern Motoring good to know.. that might be good news.. as cars started arriving at usa dealers within a week of usa press meet.. Hopefully we get same now at Canadian dealers this week or next week as press meet completed..
add $15k for similar performance. My comparison to the MDX: The fiercest competitor to the new CX-90 is Acura’s MDX. It drives well and looks sharp. They trade points back and forth. Example: MDX has car-like steering/pedal feel while CX-90 displays Mazda’s design philosophy of road feedback and heavier steering/pedals. Do you want to drive a nicer Honda? Then buy the MDX. Do you want more of a driver’s car? Then buy the Mazda. I felt very confident while driving the CX-90 with it’s rear-wheel biased AWD, even in rain. The Acura seats are absolutely fantastic, the most comfortable out there. I seriously can’t gush enough over the MDX seats. Oh, and both front seats get identical treatment. The passenger isn’t relegated to second class adjustments, lol. The Mazda seats look nicer but are quite a bit firmer. We’ll see how my bottom end handles a long trip but after two hours I was ready to get out of my CX-90 for a bit. With the seat firmness addressed, the Mazda is still more refined overall. Despite the firmer seats, the overall ride is a little softer (and quieter) than the Acura . MDX has wind noise and floor vibration not present in the CX-90. I believe this is due to Mazda’s better suspension and noise damping control than the Advanced package Acura. The MDX Type S has air ride suspension but we did not test this trim back to back against the Mazda. Why not compare top trim to top trim? The MDX costs $15k more than a similarly dressed CX-90. I bought the very top trim Mazda for the bottom engine priced Acura. More pro’s and con’s: my Mazda has ventilated second row seats which are lacking in almost all competitors. The MDX has a removable second row console that converts between seat/armrest/removable. It’s a great design that everyone should copy. CX-90 has air conditioning vents and USB-C chargers in the third row that the Acura lacks. I can become accustomed to either entertainment control but the Mazda control ring is better than the Acura trackpad. Most of all, one must go up to the $75k Acura Type S to get decent sound. The non-S trim sound is horrific. I couldn’t listen to such bloated junk. Seriously, “she sounds hideous.” Even Mazda’s Bose sounded like even spectral response in comparison. With all the Bose 3D spatial mess turned off the CX-90 is fairly true to name, “linear.” I can live with it for a while. The dash is another area where Mazda simplicity shines. The MDX steering wheel and dash controls are much busier. In contrast I can quickly find what I need in the Mazda, which ranks high on my driving safety factor.
@Modern Motoring 1. I mean overall as a reliability and resale value in future.. 2. In canada palisade has 5years warranty powertrain and 3 years electronics warranty and Cx90 will have 3years warranty...Palisade is giving me extended warranty till 7years by paying extra $2300, so is it good to buy that for peace of mind or to increase resale value as it's transferable? 3. Also, cx90 is forcing leather seats and captain chairs to get 360 camera.. so how good is to have 360 camera in these bigger cars? Palisade is giving 360 camera even in lower trim with Fake leather seats and a bench in 2nd row.. 4. Cx90 even a demo car has not arrived yet in canada.. not sure when will my delivery will come may be another 4-6months.. but palisade is available next week. So should I cancel my deposit for cx90 and get palisade or cx90 is much better than palisade?
@@akhere07 That’s a lot to unpack! We can tell you this: people question it, but Hyundai has improved in recent years both in reliability and in resale value. It sounds like in your specific situation you may get more value out of the Palisade, mostly because you can get it now and it offers the balance of features you’re looking for. As for an extended warranty, we rarely recommend it when a vehicle is going to be well-maintained. Let us know if you have any more questions!
Korean twins Kia Telluride / Hyundai Palisade The Hyundai sales manager put it best, “on paper you can’t beat it.” He’s right, you know. That’s why we actually drive vehicles instead of just going by numbers. If you just HAVE to carry 8 passengers and are too cool for a minivan, this could be on your list. But it was quickly kicked off ours. Seats are less comfortable than the quite firm CX-90, ride was louder and rougher. Quite the vibration. The Korean twins just seemed cheap in comparison. The drive was not inspiring and the AWD system failed to maintain traction with just a little throttle into the dealership (car popped over the hill).
Mazda is on the mark with pricing, nowadays even crappy KIA cost close to 50K so this Mazda is a bargain. Hondas cost so much more with less fit and finish quality. Mazdas are hidden gems and they have moved upscale better than Infiniti and Acura.
@@Thankyou_3 I agree. I checked Palisade, Telluride and the new Pilot. All top trims. None of them matched the interior quality. It is definitely looks like a Premium product. I only wish the black wheel availability for the regular HP Premium Plus version.
Sorry but highlander and any lexus is a no no to me, except lc500 and LFA. My mom drives a gx460 and I don’t like it one bit, either 4runners such a bad fuel economy choice plus quality and ride comfort is not even there
Nice seeing a review on one of the lower trims. Love the review!
Thank you for the kind words!
I drove wheezy 4 cylinder cars all my life because I hate debt and I hate car payments and so does my wife. Since 2018 we've been saving up for a new car and got a CX-90 with the less powerful engine and it's wonderful. I know it's not a 911 turbo but compared to what we had both been driving since we were in high school it's smooth like butter and just takes off when you put your foot down. Unless you need to tow I can't imagine somebody not being satisfied with the base engine.
Congrats!!!
I have no need for a 3 row so I'm more interested in seeing the CX-70, but the enthusiast in me hopes they put this engine/transmission combo in a sedan (or better yet a wagon)!
If there’s any automaker out there that’s likely do to such a thing, it’s Mazda!
Cx70 is the exact same dimensions as cx90 so might as well put the seats down and you have a cx70 lol
Both cx9 and cx90 are great suvs,both unique in there own way.cant go wrong with either one,to me.
Rumour has it that the CX 70 will be a CX 90 with five seats, not a smaller vehicle like the CX 60. Could this be a mistake made by Mazda? Cancel the CX 70, import the CX 60! Good review.
👀
I don't think so I'm sure it isn't as big as the CX-90. It will be the same as cx-60 but a bit wider and longer.
CX60 is the same size as the 50
What I really hope is that the CX70 is to the CX90 what the Honda Passport is to the Pilot. I love my Passport, but if they really a Mazda equivalent I’d strongly consider it. I think the Passport is a brilliant Goldilocks vehicle in having room vs being compact, as well as being decent on the road vs being able to handle some rougher stuff. Don’t need an off roader, just something for beat to hell forest roads
I’d REALLY consider it if they offered a CX70 that is a little more ruggedized (more ground clearance, higher volume tires, etc).
RUMOUR???????
Wow..first real review I've watched with true candor on a car's performance. Great job guys. I liked the real world application on the body roll when turning. I was debating on whether the GTP was that much better than the GT and this review sorts it out. Not much besides the HP difference and families aren't really racing SUVs.
Thanks for the great review!🎉
That color looks great
It's a real pleasure to watch this video. Thank you
Thank YOU for watching and commenting, we appreciate it!
The US Turbo Premium Plus 280 hp has many more features than the Canadian GT version like, ventilated and heated front seats, the 12.3-inch digital gauge screen and the 12.3-inch dash screen, 360 cameras to name a few.
Someone buying lower trims are a bit more conscious of spending money on things like digital dash, power folding mirrors, etc. Just something that you'd dread having to pay to replace out of warranty. GT trim seems like it's the sweet spot for Canada. I think I prefer the rims on the GT over black painted, machined face type on higher trims.
Nice review folks, beautiful vehicle. I love the instrument cluster with minimum screen even for HVAC buttons. Great job Mazda, you guys are on a roll one hit after another.
This vehicle beats any overpriced Honda.
We truly appreciate your ongoing support, Rocky!
It cx30 slides all of the road anywhich way possible not enough weigh to the vehicular to be able to ride a snowy slushy round even high was I was almost killed by a tractor trailer
And snowy
I was almost killed by atractortrailer during a snow storm and slushy
Highway
It looks like every single reviewer I've watched has issue with the suspension, transmission and comfort, like they all say, its very responsive and handles very well but not as comfortable as it's competitors. Definitely not going this direction until Mazda figures it out
Nice review.
I turned off the auto stop/start on our Audi's via the OBD2 port. I wonder if the Mazda dealer can disable that function. Thanks for reviewing the standard 3.3T GT trim. That's what I am considering.
Great video! My first time on the channel. Just wanted to add a comment about the trim levels available to us in Canada for the CX-90 as opposed to the trims available in the US. I really wish we had one more trim in between the GT and the GT-P such as the Kuro. I would love to have the base engine with a few more options. Bring back the polymetal grey colour and the blacked out rims. I would love the option for the wine red seats as well as ventilated seats in the front. All of these extra options would be great for a family that doesn't need a high output engine that recommends premium fuel. I believe Mazda USA offers this with the Turbo Premium Plus trim (minus the wheels and seat colour). Thanks again for the great video!
Thank you for the kind words and welcome to the Modern Motoring community, Ryan!
at 600-700 and above for the 21inch tires your joy will be tested
The Platinum Quart Metallic, my favorite new color choice! I wish it was offered in other Mazda models. Leather seats are overrated; velour cloth seats should be an option.
Very nice review with unique insight! It looks like you can control the second row HVAC from the front, which would be great! Can you make any comment on how the power feel compared to the CX-9?
Thanks for your kind words! The CX-9 feels similarly powered, but it’s also got a smaller engine with less to move, so it makes sense that it balances out. Hope that helps! And thanks again for watching!
Nice review. I would buy coming from CX 5. What camera equipment you are using , i really want to know. Excellent quality.
Thanks! GoPro Hero 9 and a Canon 6D Mk2
Great review 🤗. Mazdas are great!
Thanks so much for watching!
Mazda for the first is combining the 3.3 turbo with the 8 speed snd start stop system..wonder how it holds up..
Thanks for a real review instead of the recital of features that could be found on any website.
Is the color Rhodium White or Platinum Quartz?
That's in the brochure
Thanks for the kind words, we appreciate them and you! Colour is Platinum Quartz Metallic :)
Which colour would you go with?
@@Modern.Motoring Unfortunately in the States parking sensors and 2nd row bench are only offered on the base Turbo S, the trim has limited color options. So either white or platinum.
@@TheFalconx00 parking sensors?
I'd call front double wishbone suspension as pretty fancy (though it isn't adaptive, so maybe that's what you're alluding too.) The number of 3-row SUVs with double wishbone is pretty small (Acura MDX, anyone else?)
My issue is that you can't get all the features of the top inline 6 trims in this engine. I still want vented seats, HUD, the nicer tail lights/headlights, 360 cam whatever is missing, I don't have the option page next to me but this GT is missing quite a bit. Why do brands keep trying to reinvent the shifter? I have Acura and Mazda in the driveway, and I love the fact my Mazda, the least sporty and luxury of the 2 has a good ole fashioned shifter. I feel like I'm driving the Mazda, whereas the Acura feels like a video game with button shifters...and it's a Type S!
Have you driven phev version? If so how it drives compared to turbo high output?
I test drove the cx 90 the other day and really wanted to love it and buy it...but the stutter was noticeable every stop and go we had...the seats were beautiful, but not comfortable...i was thinking it would feel silky smooth and float down the road...but it wasn't as nice as i was hoping...I also test drove a Santa Fe, Palisade, and pilot...the Santa Fe's were AMAZING!! I was in total shock...super responsive and the SILKY smooth...I'm still in shock...and the Palisade...WOW! Pilot is way too loose with the steering...The cx 90 was responsive and was smooth once you got moving, but it just wasn't what I thought it would be. The seats...Hyundai had the most comfortable seats...I didn't think the cx 90 was terrible but I was ready to get out of the seats pretty quick..I felt I could have driven the Hyundai's for 1000 miles. Writing this I'm still shocked...I can't lie about it...Space...the Santa Fe, Palisade, and Pilot were much more spacious. I'm hoping mazda listens to some of the criticisms and make some changes. Still a beautiful car, but with the DCT transmission, uncomfortable seats, and minimal cargo, and that stutter, just wasn't for me.
how is the wireless android auto and apple car play on this car? toyota cars are still having trouble with the connection
Are there fog lights on this trim?
I hate that they made the lower trims with analog gauge cluster and you have to go higher in trim for the digital. Why do that? On every other vehicle I’ve test driven what ever gauge cluster is available is standard period with the only difference maybe being driving modes/color changes.
Agreed.
what about toyota and honda?
Would have loved to see a traditional engine/transmission in the lower trim models.. The CX-9s torque convertered 6spd auto was so tractable at low speeds/real world driving, and just falls away to do it's job, unnoticed. Hopefully Mazda can make some software updates to smooth things out.
You know mazda 9 have 6 speed so why you buy and now cry here
@@yournightmare9999 Every road test is complaining about shuddering, and slow engagement during launch. Mazda is a small company that can't afford a reliability issue (even perceived).
@bonjournaste what you talking about now mazda is more reliable than toyota or lexus especially Japanese build cx5,9, cx90
@@yournightmare9999 Exactly the reason I'm worried they have switched from a bulletproof conventional automatic to a new design without a torque converter.
I'm all in on Mazda, but a big part of that for me is that they keep their designs simple and refine over many years.
How do you compare this with grand highlander hybrid max? which one you recommend, is there a big difference in their third rows?
The GH isn’t on the Canadian media fleet yet…we’ll review it as soon as it is.
Is this available yet in Canada or do you have to order one? Also, are they selling at MSPR?
With the market being what it is these days, almost everything needs to be ordered. Best to check with your local dealer if you’re looking for lot inventory. We can’t comment on whether dealers are marking up except to say it’s not as common in Canada but it does happen, so it’s best to arrive to your negotiations prepared. Hope that helps.
Turn off auto stop. Most engine wear comes during start, why do that several times a day?
i-Stop will not work (NOT TURN OFF ENGINE) if you Brake Lightly to any Stop therefore your Engne Remains ON and @ idle when stop.
Is this really Canadian cx90?
You didnt mention where you got this as even demo cars have not arrived yet in canada
.
This, like all of our vehicles, come from the Canadian media/press fleet.
So yes, this is really a Canadian CX-90.
@Modern Motoring good to know.. that might be good news.. as cars started arriving at usa dealers within a week of usa press meet..
Hopefully we get same now at Canadian dealers this week or next week as press meet completed..
So you’re saying we can shut off the start/stop feature? Seems to be confusion there. A deal breaker for some.
That’s what we are saying.
MDX Type S vs Mazda CX90?
add $15k for similar performance. My comparison to the MDX:
The fiercest competitor to the new CX-90 is Acura’s MDX. It drives well and looks sharp. They trade points back and forth. Example: MDX has car-like steering/pedal feel while CX-90 displays Mazda’s design philosophy of road feedback and heavier steering/pedals. Do you want to drive a nicer Honda? Then buy the MDX. Do you want more of a driver’s car? Then buy the Mazda. I felt very confident while driving the CX-90 with it’s rear-wheel biased AWD, even in rain.
The Acura seats are absolutely fantastic, the most comfortable out there. I seriously can’t gush enough over the MDX seats. Oh, and both front seats get identical treatment. The passenger isn’t relegated to second class adjustments, lol. The Mazda seats look nicer but are quite a bit firmer. We’ll see how my bottom end handles a long trip but after two hours I was ready to get out of my CX-90 for a bit.
With the seat firmness addressed, the Mazda is still more refined overall. Despite the firmer seats, the overall ride is a little softer (and quieter) than the Acura . MDX has wind noise and floor vibration not present in the CX-90. I believe this is due to Mazda’s better suspension and noise damping control than the Advanced package Acura. The MDX Type S has air ride suspension but we did not test this trim back to back against the Mazda. Why not compare top trim to top trim? The MDX costs $15k more than a similarly dressed CX-90. I bought the very top trim Mazda for the bottom engine priced Acura.
More pro’s and con’s: my Mazda has ventilated second row seats which are lacking in almost all competitors. The MDX has a removable second row console that converts between seat/armrest/removable. It’s a great design that everyone should copy. CX-90 has air conditioning vents and USB-C chargers in the third row that the Acura lacks. I can become accustomed to either entertainment control but the Mazda control ring is better than the Acura trackpad. Most of all, one must go up to the $75k Acura Type S to get decent sound. The non-S trim sound is horrific. I couldn’t listen to such bloated junk. Seriously, “she sounds hideous.” Even Mazda’s Bose sounded like even spectral response in comparison. With all the Bose 3D spatial mess turned off the CX-90 is fairly true to name, “linear.” I can live with it for a while. The dash is another area where Mazda simplicity shines. The MDX steering wheel and dash controls are much busier. In contrast I can quickly find what I need in the Mazda, which ranks high on my driving safety factor.
Really lovely Ontario test drive review
Thank you :)
Ontario?
How is hyundai palisade in comparison to this?
Happy to answer - which specific aspect(s) are you looking for?
@Modern Motoring
1. I mean overall as a reliability and resale value in future..
2. In canada palisade has 5years warranty powertrain and 3 years electronics warranty and Cx90 will have 3years warranty...Palisade is giving me extended warranty till 7years by paying extra $2300, so is it good to buy that for peace of mind or to increase resale value as it's transferable?
3. Also, cx90 is forcing leather seats and captain chairs to get 360 camera.. so how good is to have 360 camera in these bigger cars?
Palisade is giving 360 camera even in lower trim with Fake leather seats and a bench in 2nd row..
4. Cx90 even a demo car has not arrived yet in canada.. not sure when will my delivery will come may be another 4-6months.. but palisade is available next week. So should I cancel my deposit for cx90 and get palisade or cx90 is much better than palisade?
straightpipes just released a video on this comparison
@@akhere07 That’s a lot to unpack! We can tell you this: people question it, but Hyundai has improved in recent years both in reliability and in resale value. It sounds like in your specific situation you may get more value out of the Palisade, mostly because you can get it now and it offers the balance of features you’re looking for. As for an extended warranty, we rarely recommend it when a vehicle is going to be well-maintained. Let us know if you have any more questions!
Korean twins Kia Telluride / Hyundai Palisade
The Hyundai sales manager put it best, “on paper you can’t beat it.” He’s right, you know. That’s why we actually drive vehicles instead of just going by numbers. If you just HAVE to carry 8 passengers and are too cool for a minivan, this could be on your list. But it was quickly kicked off ours. Seats are less comfortable than the quite firm CX-90, ride was louder and rougher. Quite the vibration. The Korean twins just seemed cheap in comparison. The drive was not inspiring and the AWD system failed to maintain traction with just a little throttle into the dealership (car popped over the hill).
What is that exterior color name?
Platinum Quartz Metallic.
@@Modern.Motoringthank you. Looks like a nice light slate gray on camera. Is it more gray or gold?
@@mig3872 a touch of a gold tinge is what we see👀
@@Modern.Motoring thank you so much. Shopping between this, telluride and gv80. No idea which one to get. Lol
@@mig3872 there’s no bad option… let us know what you decide on :)
You can get a hifhlander platinium awd for mid 50s. MAZDA HAS BECOME OUT OF REACH
Mazda is on the mark with pricing, nowadays even crappy KIA cost close to 50K so this Mazda is a bargain.
Hondas cost so much more with less fit and finish quality.
Mazdas are hidden gems and they have moved upscale better than Infiniti and Acura.
@@Thankyou_3 I agree. I checked Palisade, Telluride and the new Pilot. All top trims. None of them matched the interior quality. It is definitely looks like a Premium product. I only wish the black wheel availability for the regular HP Premium Plus version.
Highlander????? Do u mean Lexus???????????
Sorry but highlander and any lexus is a no no to me, except lc500 and LFA. My mom drives a gx460 and I don’t like it one bit, either 4runners such a bad fuel economy choice plus quality and ride comfort is not even there
I did a test drive in the turbo S, I was not impressed with the vehicle! I am not a fan of Japan!
What specific parts were you unimpressed with?
Be more specific other than you don’t like Japan (whatever that may mean).