The Chinese gov't is pragmatic, its stand never changed, China's stand back from 1962 is: doesn't recognize both Johnson's line in the west and McDonald Line in the east as border lines because those lines were drawn randomly and unilaterally by Englishmen, not agreed by both sides back then. However, China willing to do a swap, i.e. India takes what currently held in the east part territory (roughly 90K square KM), and China takes currently held in the west part territory (roughly 30K square KM). From India's stand, India wants both, this what the real problem lies.
Your statement is correct and I agree. Dr. Sawhney spent many minutes explaining the methods of war. To me, it is war-mongering and promoting fear. His message should be NO WAR, ONLY PEACE!!! India should settle all their border disputes. Make Love, Not Wars! Promote development, not destruction! China does not have colonizing in their DNA! They take protection of their sovereignty very seriously though.
Not really, china doesn't want a swap or looking for any other similar form of deals, they want what they already presented in the new map published officially.
While I mostly agree with Mr Sawhney, I must say that China doesn’t want a war with India. Its primary concern is Taiwan’s independence clandestinely supported by the US. I believe India’s top leadership doesn’t want a war either. The two should resume the border talks and settle the border dispute asap. So many Indians including in the comments below keep saying that it’s all India’s territory and there is no dispute.
no Indian politicians alive have the political capital to settle the border dispute with China. lest the party not in power accuses the government gives away too much.
India which is a good friend of Russia should consult with Russia how they have thousands of border miles with China and they are happily living each other as neighbors while india has been having problem after problem with where the line ends and where it begins . And the border is short with China compare to China and Russia
Dr. Sawhney has an excellent grasp of the outcome, should military hubris try to relive the 1962 border war. This is how military leaders think. Their mind is trying to fight the past wars. The British created the border issues with China by drawing lines on a map and not consulting the Chinese who never agreed to what the arrogant British did. China has borders with 14 countries and the once the CPC won its civil war in 1949, it began a process and settled its land borders will all its neighbours, except one. To settle borders, each side gives up a little to create peace and stability. If the border is not agreed to, then expect this situation and its burden on India to last forever.
This fellow Sawhney must have recently read about some English fiction and must have lost sleep .... Why he is advising military chief of India when mil chief is not responsible in those domains. Sawhney thinks Indian think tank does not know all those he is talking about.
India needs wars and external enemies to keep this sheethole of a country intact. Generations of politicians used war and border conflict to rally nationalism and ride that to power. It will never change.
You don't expect the silly people of India to talk intelligently about economic development. But everyone is a military guru in India including the maker of this video.
Why would either India or China engage in another border war when the costs to both sides may far exceed tangible benefits? There doesn't seem to be any appetite in Beijing or New Delhi for a second Sino-Indian War that will cause even more long-term problems between the two nations, so who really benefit from the chaos, death, and destruction?
He is funded by information warfare wing of chinese MSS a indian hacker revealed it ...but this shameless is doing his job because of money just see his all videos ind vs china 😂 its a tactic of information warfare both side can't afford a war
The answer is USA, Russians at this point is most hated by the Poland, polish people have the most negative view of Russians, and have been taking the brunt of refugees between the war of ukraine and russia as far as I know Bu why do the polish hate each other its because of constant US propaganda fed to them through US lobbyed politicians and media same goes with India, most of India is under tight grips of USA funded propaganda the same way it was once with Soviet Union, Most children of Indian politician and media moghuls study in USA, they are heavily funded by USA, and it has deep infiltration in the Indian political system through foreign funded NGO's and Indo American think as an Indian I think its quite unfortunate that I feel for a fact in case if there is a third world war India might play the same roles for the Americans as it did for the Britishers during the second world war
Thank you, Mr. Sawhney, for doing an objective analysis. I have one comment for my Indian friends: Gen. Manoj Pande, the Indian Chief of Staff, is not qualified to be an Army Chief. His statement about war with China is an idiotic thought process.
Pravin Sawhney, retired as a very junior officer from Artillery. His friends tell me that he did not get permanent commission. Has been working for foreign magazines as a journalist for 25 years. Mainly as a fear monger including his books. He was many years my junior in the Army. I was commissioned in 1067
@@c.s.narula8714 Thanks for the introduction of Mr. Sawhney. He must be an officer of the Indian Army's Short Service Commission. Since the country's president awards the commission, the officer is an officer, irrespective of the length of training at the military academy. Mr. Sawhney may have yet to earn his PhD However, a few Ph.D. generals in the US Army, like Gen. Petraeus, have done no good to their country. The Afghan Fiasco cost the US taxpayers over two trillion dollars, two lost decades and over a million PTSD diagnoses. Mr. Sawhney has published a few books and is doing his best to educate the Indian public and policymakers not to follow US footsteps with China. India's conflict with China would overrun the US-Afghan financial quagmire, over US $2 trillion in the following decades in terms of lost opportunity to alleviate poverty and develop infrastructure to uplift and end poverty for 800 million Indians.
❤ China India Pakistan should focus on energy security and food security, along with water resources management, and industrialization, education and health
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj. In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC. However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal. Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want. A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
The earliest Tibetan historical texts identify the Zhang Zhung culture as a people who migrated from the Amdo region into what is now the region of Guge in western Tibet. Zhang Zhung is considered to be the original home of the Bön religion. By the 1st century BCE, a neighboring kingdom arose in the Yarlung valley, and the Yarlung king, Drigum Tsenpo, attempted to remove the influence of the Zhang Zhung by expelling the Zhang's Bön priests from Yarlung. He was assassinated and Zhang Zhung continued its dominance of the region until it was annexed by Songtsen Gampo in the 7th century.
The history of a unified Tibet begins with the rule of Songtsen Gampo (604-650 CE), who united parts of the Yarlung River Valley and founded the Tibetan Empire. He also brought in many reforms, and Tibetan power spread rapidly, creating a large and powerful empire. It is traditionally considered that his first wife was the Princess of Nepal, Bhrikuti, and that she played a great role in the establishment of Buddhism in Tibet. In 640, he married Princess Wencheng, the niece of the Chinese emperor Taizong of Tang China
Tibet never belonged to China. It was a part of China when China herself was under Mongol rule . Tibet had a claim over only the Tawang region which she relinquished in 1914. There was no Tibet/China south of the Himalayas. The Mcmahon Line is not an arbitrary line drawn illogically like the Radcliffe Line. It is based on the internationally recognized principle of watershed demarcation with the boundary running along the crest of the mountains. It's base on geographically sound principles. Neither geographically nor historically nor culturally has Arunachal Pradesh been a part of Tibet. Tibet is a plateau to the north of Himalayas and Arunachal lies yo the South of this chain much like Nepal , Bhutan, Himachal or Uttarakhand. Hence it is a part of India .And the people there speak Hindi neither Mandarin nor Tibetan . And have chosen their representatives in electing after election thus reposting their faith in India. Therefore India will fight to the end if it ever comes to Arunachal. Make no mistake. China better not start a war with India over what is a non negotiable matter for India. Even if its a nuclear war.
There are rules for war and this is why no country can win wars any more. Israel ignoring the rules and that’s why it’s a genocide and even then they’re failing a total occupancy of Gaza…. Another issue is people are not willing to join the army, people are sick of wars… only Governments talk of wars… In reality if you take out politics, Chinese and Indians get along…. There is a country which I forgot the name where Russians and Ukrainians fled to because of the war and they get along there no problem…
There is a reason why the Indian government is not willing to talk it through… China never agreed where the border lies but the British push this to the Indians and they took it as the border, so the Indian government is stuck with this narrative and can’t look weak in front of it’s own people, only way is to push forward and claim all of it rather than negotiate something realistic…
@@santhugowda7179you drank too much from ganges 😂 nothing India can do to those 2 without fckn herself up. If it is possible it would have been done already by your delusional leadership.
Basically, the Modi Government wanted this issue to champion his national election agenda! That is all. They will keep on talking on this issue for another century!
I think Dr. Sawhney should be more concern with the possibility that having conflict with US than with China based on the last 30 years of US intervention and the demographic of India society.
Super power India has Brahmos missiles, 2 state of the art aircraft carriers, home grown Tejas fighter jets, so what's the worry.? Added to that India has powerful western allies and admirers. Indians are rightlfully proud of their powerful status.
Sir, your analysis is fair but a worst case scenario. In truth, China's eye ball is on Taiwan, and the tussle in South China Sea, because these are of strategic interests. So China cannot commit so much resource to border issue with India. In fact, the border issue between India and China can be attributed to 2 fundamental issues: 1. both sides have inherited poorly marked borders from British Empire and ROC/ Qing Dynasty. 2. Tibet issue. If both sides have political wisdom, border issues can be resolved. May peace prevail!
Modi in 2018(?) solved the border disputes. He colored in all disputed territories as sovereign India on their new map. This is what caused the flare up & nothing's changed.
@@alanhamford2538 Guess India just like US, needs a booygey like China to divert the facts that China is just far, far, far....ahead of India despite whatever India wish to brag about today or the western propaganda which to manipulate negative narratives of China. Even the border issues are the legacy of the colonial eras, weak and collapsing Qing Dynasty/Nationalist government. Taiwan nowadays is a good example, the ever existence is dependent of an imperialist or hegemon like US/West before CCP. But India politicians and media prefer to portrayed China as a expansionist power or land grabber. Fascinating to note, reckon India (being a nation/nations of long history) is still entrapped with their colonial mentality or prefer to live under the hegemon powers as before by being a junior partner. On the other hand, probably wishing to be the "Big Bully Brother" of South Asia.
The truth hurts, but it is the best medicine for saving innocent lives. We are seeing miscalculation problems in Ukraine 🇺🇦. India should be thankful to have someone like you
@@safashaikh2894 just search the map of Pakistan before 1971 and after 1971 and let me tell you India never attacked Pakistan be it 1948,1965,1971 or 1999 it always Pakistan who attacked us
I see India talking about war with China frequently but I don't see much talk about war with India from the China side. Perhaps less talking is better because the more you talk about war the more it could become a reality.
@nirmalbhel3231 A border clash is not a war. No airforce, artillery and heavy weapons were used. Please wake up and stop embarrassing yourself and your fellow countrymen.
I will call Modi a great man if he finds a way to engage with China at the highest level of government, negotiate a mutually agreeable border agreement and establish eternal peace between these two great nations.
very imaginative narrative. A portrayal of a worst scenario, shich mostly likely will not happen. The question remains... under what circumstances will China be forced to do this?
Exactly!!! Dr. Sawhney spent many minutes explaining the methods of war. To me, it is war-mongering and promoting fear. His message should be NO WAR, ONLY PEACE!!! India should settle all their border disputes. Make Love, Not Wars! Promote development, not destruction! China does not have colonizing in their DNA! They take protection of their sovereignty very seriously though. The Indian public should listen closely to what the Chinese leadership says. They are always promoting peace and development. One should also look closely at their actions. They have not dropped any bombs on any country. They have built a lot of infrastructure though, which has certainly helped a lot of countries in the global south in Asia, Africa, South America, etc. PEACE, brothers and sisters!!!
@@IronMan-nu3rb Kashmir kisi k baap ki jageer thori hai. Aur kisi ko free karna chaiye toh woh india karega, kyunki unho ne hi kabza kia hua hai. Kashmiri logo ki marzi k bina kabza liya hai.
Focus should be to resolve the border issue. Otherwise this issue will be just passed on from one generation to another in both countries and peoples of 2 most populated countries having not good relationship is not good for Asia and for overall world especially developing world as they look forward to both India and China for collaboration in future. Border issue is very easy so resolve. China wants connectivity while India wants security. By declaring certain disputed areas as buffer zones or economic zones or no military zones this problem can be easily resolved. There is already an agreement that in areas where there is settled population there will be no changes so Arunachal Pradesh is non negotiable. Same way India must uphold the One China Policy which it has always done and this will help create mutual trust. Most important thing would be POK. India should let go of POK as it's never gonna come and let's accept this reality and move on. Convert it into international boundary and make kashmir whatever we have into its best version should be the focus. Otherwise POK is also just politicised from both side of political spectrum whether internally or externally. Let's show maturity and move forward. If we can solve these issues we can focus on areas of economic development which is more important to every Indian and Pakistani and Chinese and Global South. Peace 🙏
I don't think China will accept that proposed solution and neither will India. Both countries has grown large enough and so does their ego or self perceived strength. I think peaceful resolution possibility is basically over without huge status change in one or both countries, e.g. one country suddenly in political and social turmoil and is on a civil war. China resolved its border with Russia soon after it broke up post soviet era. At least the serious discussion started then and eventually resolved a few years later. China has also resolved its border issue with most other small nations along its border because the parties were clear on who they are dealing with. Countries backed by the US such as the philipines and Japan won't resolve territorial dispute until the withdrawal of the US from western pacific. US backing also create self perceived strength and ego. I think both nations understood this and both are waiting for the other to suffer large calamity before starting negotiation in earnest. Few nation will sacrifice an inch of their territory if they think they are superior or equal to the others. In fact, China is probably one of the few major nation that is willing to compromise on territories through negotiation. But even then, I don't think the indian side will compromise.
Without the border issues alive, India does not have good excuse: 1) to keep distant from China, 2) to play a significant role in Quad, thus asking more tecknology och financial support from the west to develop its economy as so called "other alternative".
India didn't have any border issue before Xi took over. The border accord between India and China was going well till Xi's regime. India had no choice asking help from West
@@nirmalbhel3231you are still slaves of the Anglo-Saxon White's Colonails.........!!!!!!!!!! The border issue was the Anglo-Saxon British maked........!!!!!!!!!! If India not stop been stupid and want to take Chinese land you will get smack for sure.........?????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everytime i listen to Mr Sahwney's video, i need to do it 3 times to understand it fully.. Seems like India will suffer humiliating defeats in its next wars as their doctrine is still Land or army heavy... that is sooooooo outdated😂🤣
Dr Sawhney is really describing the military technologies and capabilities of USA. India is a respectable and strategic regional power. China and India shares a common colonial history as well as trade. They could and should collaborate to enhance their respective economies and security through building bridges, making the world a safer and better place
Excellent sir. So, India is not prepared for war with China . A simplified position (that may also be supported by advanced analysis) may show that there is very low probability of full fledged war with China in next 25/50 years. However, there is high probability of war in near future with Pakistan, so India is preparing to defeat Pakistan in 5/7 days and Indian armed forces preparedness should be seen in this scenario.
Parveen jee, need of the hour is that Asia and South Asia, has a common enemy of poverty, hunger. Food security, energy security, and enormous population ❤❤ they need to fight this common enemy
as a Chinese we don't want to fight a war with India. let's settle on what we have now. Actually China settled all land border dispute with its neighbors except india.
Dr. Sawhney, have you got connection with the govt of India? Please tell them that they need to take action and be ready for fight. I am a Malaysian and that's my 5 cents worth of comments. Have a great day.
Great respect to Mr Sawhney who n whom all so-called Political Leaders of Nations should heed d facts of realities. Mr Sawhney is crystal clear of his analysis of d strength of China 🇨🇳 where a war could be fought without boots oñ d ground. Best to let sleeping 🐉 Dragon sleep 😴 💤 Peace be with U ✌️
This video is very hard to translate in Hindi/Urdu or any Indian language because these languages lack the modern warfare terminology/nomenclature. Basic understanding of English is required to understand this video.
Mr Sawhney. They say "LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS". your narrative is ok but conclusions are cockeyed . This includes few of the comments below, which are totally unprofessional. Please leave this to ARMED FORCES. we are professionals and we know aur strengths and limitations. Please do not misguide INDIAN PUBLIC with your partial mastery over few military terms which your 65 K followers may not understand. Gen Pandey and our leadership is seized of the matter and so far they have proved themselves in an outstanding manner. A word of advice- please avoid commenting on the matters of national security in which you are a brilliant ROOKY. Regards and if you feel I am ready to debate with you not for your sake but for the sake of my brave INDIANS who may lose their self respect just coz of few of of you who are motivated against a great nation i.e India
so what 3 wars have india fought and won in the same 25yrs .? None . You are also missing what the video speaker has said . War with China will be different type of war for the reasons he explained. So no country has the experience of fighting this different war. You better not wish for it
The important issue here is, where are our MAIN priorities Is it in creating our own systems or rely on outsiders who are not reliable. Do we have our focus there, especially the focus of the politicians, or is it elsewhere?
If the scenario outlined here is a possibility, then why has it not been applied in the Ukrainian domain. Surely Russia has capabilities similar to China's?
the major mistake pravin sawhney is making is that when it comes to space and intelligence & communication is the US presence. But he is right, cyber attack capability & AI is an issue
Law and State Trading Rights for own resources 1. Ban Private banking (Abraham Lincoln first State bank) Currency conversion by State owned bank - Personal (money changer), State Reserves (forex) 2. Ban Private ownership of State assets 2. Ban LGBT, Drugs 3. Limit personal wealth 4. Ban tuition (wealth is grades) 5. Ban bonus (bonus for tuition for grades or buy labour products) 6. Blue collar worker hourly wage same as white collar
When China was founded,Most border lines have been confirmed one meter by one.The China India border line is one of the few that has not been confirmed.
What is the issue with China- land borders. So if China wants this land, then the Chinse has to physically occupy it. The Russia- Ukraine war has shown that despite all the modern technological domains of warfare, the need for boots on the ground has been prime donna. The whole of the nation approach is required in modern war. China is powerful but it too has limitations. Mr Sawhney has a point but it is an exaggerated view.
He said minimal boots. And god knows what the chinese are cooking up in their vibratn defence complex, maybe they deploy robots to fight india in war like the once in the hollywood movie terminator.
China wants Arunachal Pradesh . It has water resources and China needs water . Apart from that China wants to control Andaman to secure energy lines . China wants a skirmish just like 1962 so that india can be kept under its thumb. As India develops economically it will be difficult for China in future . It’s either now or never . Can China afford to go for a war with India ? India can hold off China in case of skirmish , but if the war goes on for a year or 2 , will India or China sustain ? The economy in both countries will collapse and we all will become poor .
War front par arunachal v Ladakh me OFC cable network bichhana chahiye ese hi alternative land communication ka jal har jegah bichana chahiye jisko mobile communication se rakh kar alg kathin hai asambhav nehi jiska hal
Himalayan mountains are a permanent border between India and China, it would be foolish for China to capture and retain territory in India. Their aim is simply to maintain an offensive form of Defense.
Dear sir, we need more people like you in the world to maintain peace. With your understanding of the situation, most leaders of various countries will be more willing to compromise and negotiate. China has no intention to fight with India, but I’m worried that the Indians may be encouraged by external support to do so like Ukraine.
Understand what? A non aggression pact & that's elementary inn'it. The reason for the Chinese behaviours correlate directly with the Americans military build ups, a missile siege actually with PLA entranced assumptions of India getting on the action if the Americans start a military conflict.
Only way is India changes its nuclear doctrine, it should be first use policy similar to the posture Pakistan has for India and it should be given for both Pakistan as well as China in case of threat from either.
@@turtlesoup8134 it's called revision and enhancement of your existing deterrence,. After that India would just expect China to do nothing. Being afraid or not is in their scope of control. Just see the whole region, who can be best ally for China, and dont say Pakistan unless you are a Pakistani
@@REGHat-c7q Why would a first use policy be more of a deterrence than a no first use policy? I assure your it made zero difference when it comes to nukes. Russia has first use policy, so does the US. Does it deter the houthis? or make the ukranian scared of russia? Country won't be scared of nukes especially when they also have nukes. It just means that they won't use it first if the other side has one too. Essentially, all countries have an unofficial no first use policy against other nuke power.
@@turtlesoup8134 so would you say similar outcomes might have come in current Ukraine-Russia scenario if Ukraine had nukes with first use policy? its always about having a stick who has a bigger one is next level discussion and who uses it to beat or just to threaten the other. India should use same policy towards China as Pakistan uses towards India there is no other way considering we are neighbors with big differences.
I don't know anything about defence, but i don't believe Indian defence forces is that much ignorant, or it will be that easy for Chinese as stated in the video.
Well we cannot ignore the capabilities that the chinese possess. India is certainly at the backfoot here given the lack of operational capabilities. Given that it is presumed "EASY" for the chinese.
The Chinese gov't is pragmatic, its stand never changed, China's stand back from 1962 is: doesn't recognize both Johnson's line in the west and McDonald Line in the east as border lines because those lines were drawn randomly and unilaterally by Englishmen, not agreed by both sides back then. However, China willing to do a swap, i.e. India takes what currently held in the east part territory (roughly 90K square KM), and China takes currently held in the west part territory (roughly 30K square KM). From India's stand, India wants both, this what the real problem lies.
Your statement is correct and I agree. Dr. Sawhney spent many minutes explaining the methods of war. To me, it is war-mongering and promoting fear. His message should be NO WAR, ONLY PEACE!!! India should settle all their border disputes. Make Love, Not Wars! Promote development, not destruction! China does not have colonizing in their DNA! They take protection of their sovereignty very seriously though.
Not really, china doesn't want a swap or looking for any other similar form of deals, they want what they already presented in the new map published officially.
While I mostly agree with Mr Sawhney, I must say that China doesn’t want a war with India. Its primary concern is Taiwan’s independence clandestinely supported by the US. I believe India’s top leadership doesn’t want a war either. The two should resume the border talks and settle the border dispute asap. So many Indians including in the comments below keep saying that it’s all India’s territory and there is no dispute.
o
no Indian politicians alive have the political capital to settle the border dispute with China. lest the party not in power accuses the government gives away too much.
You are asking the pollies to put the betterment of the country before the need to retain power.
India which is a good friend of Russia should consult with Russia how they have thousands of border miles with China and they are happily living each other as neighbors while india has been having problem after problem with where the line ends and where it begins . And the border is short with China compare to China and Russia
@@willengel2458ask Russia how they settle their thousands of miles border with China
Dr. Sawhney has an excellent grasp of the outcome, should military hubris try to relive the 1962 border war. This is how military leaders think. Their mind is trying to fight the past wars.
The British created the border issues with China by drawing lines on a map and not consulting the Chinese who never agreed to what the arrogant British did. China has borders with 14 countries and the once the CPC won its civil war in 1949, it began a process and settled its land borders will all its neighbours, except one.
To settle borders, each side gives up a little to create peace and stability.
If the border is not agreed to, then expect this situation and its burden on India to last forever.
Coloniser drug dealer and thief brit stolen China land when China was weak during qin govt...
This fellow Sawhney must have recently read about some English fiction and must have lost sleep .... Why he is advising military chief of India when mil chief is not responsible in those domains. Sawhney thinks Indian think tank does not know all those he is talking about.
India needs wars and external enemies to keep this sheethole of a country intact. Generations of politicians used war and border conflict to rally nationalism and ride that to power. It will never change.
Without external enemies like China or Pakistan, India will fall apart.
You don't expect the silly people of India to talk intelligently about economic development. But everyone is a military guru in India including the maker of this video.
Why would either India or China engage in another border war when the costs to both sides may far exceed tangible benefits? There doesn't seem to be any appetite in Beijing or New Delhi for a second Sino-Indian War that will cause even more long-term problems between the two nations, so who really benefit from the chaos, death, and destruction?
In a Western type of democracy, fear and hate generate votes.
He is funded by information warfare wing of chinese MSS a indian hacker revealed it ...but this shameless is doing his job because of money just see his all videos ind vs china 😂 its a tactic of information warfare both side can't afford a war
The answer is USA, Russians at this point is most hated by the Poland, polish people have the most negative view of Russians, and have been taking the brunt of refugees between the war of ukraine and russia as far as I know Bu why do the polish hate each other its because of constant US propaganda fed to them through US lobbyed politicians and media same goes with India, most of India is under tight grips of USA funded propaganda the same way it was once with Soviet Union, Most children of Indian politician and media moghuls study in USA, they are heavily funded by USA, and it has deep infiltration in the Indian political system through foreign funded NGO's and Indo American think as an Indian I think its quite unfortunate that I feel for a fact in case if there is a third world war India might play the same roles for the Americans as it did for the Britishers during the second world war
USA will benefit.
Best you listen again to the video. China's plan is close to zero Chinese casualties.
I see from your face that you seems sick or weak. Do take care of your health. You are a very valuable person for your country.
i dont agree with you. He is absolutely fine. You need an eye sight test. Any one in his age should look the same as he is
6G Revolution: China's Quantum Leap in Wireless Technology
ruclips.net/video/R1HK4FEnOh0/видео.html
Only idiots think like this, maybe you should looking after yourselves
Indian should refer to more feedback rather than listening and into believing what their politicians said.
Thank you, Mr. Sawhney, for doing an objective analysis. I have one comment for my Indian friends: Gen. Manoj Pande, the Indian Chief of Staff, is not qualified to be an Army Chief. His statement about war with China is an idiotic thought process.
Pravin Sawhney, retired as a very junior officer from Artillery. His friends tell me that he did not get permanent commission. Has been working for foreign magazines as a journalist for 25 years. Mainly as a fear monger including his books. He was many years my junior in the Army. I was commissioned in 1067
Pravin Sawhney may not be addressed as "Doctor"
@@c.s.narula8714 Thanks.
@@c.s.narula8714 Thanks for the introduction of Mr. Sawhney. He must be an officer of the Indian Army's Short Service Commission. Since the country's president awards the commission, the officer is an officer, irrespective of the length of training at the military academy.
Mr. Sawhney may have yet to earn his PhD However, a few Ph.D. generals in the US Army, like Gen. Petraeus, have done no good to their country. The Afghan Fiasco cost the US taxpayers over two trillion dollars, two lost decades and over a million PTSD diagnoses. Mr. Sawhney has published a few books and is doing his best to educate the Indian public and policymakers not to follow US footsteps with China. India's conflict with China would overrun the US-Afghan financial quagmire, over US $2 trillion in the following decades in terms of lost opportunity to alleviate poverty and develop infrastructure to uplift and end poverty for 800 million Indians.
@@c.s.narula8714
Commisioned in 1067?
❤ China India Pakistan should focus on energy security and food security, along with water resources management, and industrialization, education and health
It is monotonous 😂😂😂😂
In other words India keeps Kashmir & the disputed areas with China & they should all be happy with that?
The McMahon Line was first drafted in 1913, and the treaty to ratify them (Simla Accords) was never signed by the Republic Of China(ROC) who had just overthrown the Qing dynasty. There was no such thing as the McMahon Line in 1890, and China isn't disputing where the Line was drawn, she's disputing the validity of the Line in its entirety. The primary Indian claim is that the ROC did sign the Simla Accords because a British official called Olaf Caroe fabricated a narrative in 1938 where the ROC signed the Simla Accords (they didn't) and ceded parts of Tibet to the Raj.
In 1963 a British diplomat compared a pre-1938 treaties compendium with the post-Caroe compendium and found that Caroe had changed the note on the ROC's not signing the Simla Accords into one where the ROC signed it and considers the Indo-Tibetan border finalised. Nehru picked up a copy of Caroe's fabricated compendium so he got the impression that his country was legally entitled to more than she actually was. Compounding this was the US' decision to add fuel to the flames by declaring the McMahon Line as the legitimate boundary in an attempt to contain the spread of communism, despite reservations from the US State Department and protests from the fiercely non-communist Chiang Kai-Shek, leader of the ROC.
However, we all know Nehru irreversibly altered his country's relations with China in 1962, so by 1963, when the fabrication was discovered, it was already too late to stem the tide of Indian nationalism based on the false compendium entry. And that leaves us with the situation today, in the aftermath of a British attempt to de jure carve out a piece of Chinese territory which failed but had some success de facto, then a British fabrication of her failed attempt to carve out Chinese territory, then an Indian acceptance of the British fabrication alongside American endorsement, and a Chinese refusal to accept the fabrication as anything remotely legal.
Some Indians recognise that they don't actually have a legal claim to South Tibet, so they've begun using a different claim in that the people living in South Tibet want to be part of India more than China; in essence, a claim based on the principle of self-determination. This is India's secondary claim. However, as history has shown time and time again (Catalonia, Confederate States, Taiwan, Corsica, Chechnya, Tibet, Naxalites), without the permission of the larger body, a smaller section of the population will not be allowed to separate from its original country regardless of what they want.
A much more detailed account of the McMahon Line and its history is available here, written by Peter Lee who, contrary to impressions given by his surname, is not at all Chinese.
available where?
The earliest Tibetan historical texts identify the Zhang Zhung culture as a people who migrated from the Amdo region into what is now the region of Guge in western Tibet. Zhang Zhung is considered to be the original home of the Bön religion. By the 1st century BCE, a neighboring kingdom arose in the Yarlung valley, and the Yarlung king, Drigum Tsenpo, attempted to remove the influence of the Zhang Zhung by expelling the Zhang's Bön priests from Yarlung. He was assassinated and Zhang Zhung continued its dominance of the region until it was annexed by Songtsen Gampo in the 7th century.
The history of a unified Tibet begins with the rule of Songtsen Gampo (604-650 CE), who united parts of the Yarlung River Valley and founded the Tibetan Empire. He also brought in many reforms, and Tibetan power spread rapidly, creating a large and powerful empire. It is traditionally considered that his first wife was the Princess of Nepal, Bhrikuti, and that she played a great role in the establishment of Buddhism in Tibet. In 640, he married Princess Wencheng, the niece of the Chinese emperor Taizong of Tang China
Exactly 👍👍👍👍
Tibet never belonged to China. It was a part of China when China herself was under Mongol rule . Tibet had a claim over only the Tawang region which she relinquished in 1914. There was no Tibet/China south of the Himalayas. The Mcmahon Line is not an arbitrary line drawn illogically like the Radcliffe Line. It is based on the internationally recognized principle of watershed demarcation with the boundary running along the crest of the mountains. It's base on geographically sound principles. Neither geographically nor historically nor culturally has Arunachal Pradesh been a part of Tibet. Tibet is a plateau to the north of Himalayas and Arunachal lies yo the South of this chain much like Nepal , Bhutan, Himachal or Uttarakhand. Hence it is a part of India .And the people there speak Hindi neither Mandarin nor Tibetan . And have chosen their representatives in electing after election thus reposting their faith in India. Therefore India will fight to the end if it ever comes to Arunachal. Make no mistake. China better not start a war with India over what is a non negotiable matter for India. Even if its a nuclear war.
Why does the Indian government & media constatly talk about war and not peace?
No no one talking about war this man is having his fantasy of defeat india ...bcz he kicked out from army bcz of spying
Because Pakistan is an islamic state and China is an economic state.😂😂😂😂
There are rules for war and this is why no country can win wars any more. Israel ignoring the rules and that’s why it’s a genocide and even then they’re failing a total occupancy of Gaza…. Another issue is people are not willing to join the army, people are sick of wars… only Governments talk of wars…
In reality if you take out politics, Chinese and Indians get along…. There is a country which I forgot the name where Russians and Ukrainians fled to because of the war and they get along there no problem…
@@santhugowda7179wrong. Because no one can beat India in delusion of grandeur. The last winning army from India were the Aurengzeb's😂
godi regime need to tell bogeyman story as a way to distract the pple away from their socio econ woes n issues n the regime bad policies.
Honestly India should change these western policies of thinking about war, plz engage in diplomatic talks and solve
There is a reason why the Indian government is not willing to talk it through… China never agreed where the border lies but the British push this to the Indians and they took it as the border, so the Indian government is stuck with this narrative and can’t look weak in front of it’s own people, only way is to push forward and claim all of it rather than negotiate something realistic…
Your gem of knowledge sir
Tatti knowledge 😂😂😂😂
The title should be Narendra Modi's army doesn't understand China's war.
But Pakistani army and Chinese army well understand what indian army will do to them😂😂😂😂
@@santhugowda7179What Indian army did to China??😂😂😂
Modi ji’s RSS army , trained in 90 days to be battle ready. 🤔
@@santhugowda7179you drank too much from ganges 😂 nothing India can do to those 2 without fckn herself up. If it is possible it would have been done already by your delusional leadership.
Basically, the Modi Government wanted this issue to champion his national election agenda! That is all. They will keep on talking on this issue for another century!
I think Dr. Sawhney should be more concern with the possibility that having conflict with US than with China based on the last 30 years of US intervention and the demographic of India society.
Super power India has Brahmos missiles, 2 state of the art aircraft carriers, home grown Tejas fighter jets, so what's the worry.? Added to that India has powerful western allies and admirers. Indians are rightlfully proud of their powerful status.
😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sarcasm 🤣😆😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Always fcking mention about west , can’t India fight alone ? Always asking Master to help ? Just listen to Dr S . Said
Sir, your analysis is fair but a worst case scenario. In truth, China's eye ball is on Taiwan, and the tussle in South China Sea, because these are of strategic interests. So China cannot commit so much resource to border issue with India. In fact, the border issue between India and China can be attributed to 2 fundamental issues: 1. both sides have inherited poorly marked borders from British Empire and ROC/ Qing Dynasty. 2. Tibet issue. If both sides have political wisdom, border issues can be resolved. May peace prevail!
India has a big brother dream of the region, that's the problem!
@@Facts..Checker True
India even wants to Include Bangladesh region under it
Modi in 2018(?) solved the border disputes. He colored in all disputed territories as sovereign India on their new map. This is what caused the flare up & nothing's changed.
@@alanhamford2538 Guess India just like US, needs a booygey like China to divert the facts that China is just far, far, far....ahead of India despite whatever India wish to brag about today or the western propaganda which to manipulate negative narratives of China. Even the border issues are the legacy of the colonial eras, weak and collapsing Qing Dynasty/Nationalist government. Taiwan nowadays is a good example, the ever existence is dependent of an imperialist or hegemon like US/West before CCP.
But India politicians and media prefer to portrayed China as a expansionist power or land grabber. Fascinating to note, reckon India (being a nation/nations of long history) is still entrapped with their colonial mentality or prefer to live under the hegemon powers as before by being a junior partner. On the other hand, probably wishing to be the "Big Bully Brother" of South Asia.
The truth hurts, but it is the best medicine for saving innocent lives.
We are seeing miscalculation problems in Ukraine 🇺🇦. India should be thankful to have someone like you
India can't even win a war with Pakistan but you wanted a war with China¿???🤔😂🤣
Then who surrendered in 71.
@@Anonymous-kd2yy then why does pakistan still exist
@@safashaikh2894 just search the map of Pakistan before 1971 and after 1971 and let me tell you India never attacked Pakistan be it 1948,1965,1971 or 1999 it always Pakistan who attacked us
@@Anonymous-kd2yy, u did not even attack china but it did!
Pakistan have habit to tell lie to themselves. They dint even remember original pakistan doesn't exist after 1971.
If you do this sheet to the USA, India would have been a hole in the ground in 1962.
Wow, nice new winter coat for the Chinese New Year. Happy Chinese New Years, @Praween Sawheny!
I see India talking about war with China frequently but I don't see much talk about war with India from the China side.
Perhaps less talking is better because the more you talk about war the more it could become a reality.
Mr Sawhney, would you please do a series on what has India learn from their 1962 war with China? Thank you
China has learnt a lesson after their defeat in 1967 war
Never heard of 1967 war.@@nirmalbhel3231
@@nirmalbhel3231 it was not a war but a border clash!
@@nirmalbhel3231 67 so called phantom war a fake disinformation by india
@nirmalbhel3231 A border clash is not a war. No airforce, artillery and heavy weapons were used. Please wake up and stop embarrassing yourself and your fellow countrymen.
I will call Modi a great man if he finds a way to engage with China at the highest level of government, negotiate a mutually agreeable border agreement and establish eternal peace between these two great nations.
That will not happen. Modi already told xing ping pong. Vacate aksai chin.
Tiwan is already gone case 😂😂😂😂
who cares about what you call Modi?
@@santhugowda7179The cows are not stop been stupid will get smack for for sure........!!!!!!!!!!
The recording volume is a bit low
very imaginative narrative. A portrayal of a worst scenario, shich mostly likely will not happen.
The question remains... under what circumstances will China be forced to do this?
Exactly!!! Dr. Sawhney spent many minutes explaining the methods of war. To me, it is war-mongering and promoting fear. His message should be NO WAR, ONLY PEACE!!! India should settle all their border disputes. Make Love, Not Wars! Promote development, not destruction! China does not have colonizing in their DNA! They take protection of their sovereignty very seriously though. The Indian public should listen closely to what the Chinese leadership says. They are always promoting peace and development. One should also look closely at their actions. They have not dropped any bombs on any country. They have built a lot of infrastructure though, which has certainly helped a lot of countries in the global south in Asia, Africa, South America, etc. PEACE, brothers and sisters!!!
Praween Sawheny
Sahab
I always ,always watch and listen
to your videos
You are the best
Thank you
Hartford/CT/USA
Kashmir ko free karna dijiye...apke Army ko boliye Kashmir ko free kardein. Kab tak Occupation chalta rahega🥺
@@IronMan-nu3rb bhai tu todha pagal hai kya
@@IronMan-nu3rb Kashmir kisi k baap ki jageer thori hai. Aur kisi ko free karna chaiye toh woh india karega, kyunki unho ne hi kabza kia hua hai. Kashmiri logo ki marzi k bina kabza liya hai.
@@farissyed4564 to dear vikhari, UN ka charter jake pardle. Unpard gawar.
Dr S is great
U didnt told the Quantum domain expertise fo china . And china developing antman suit to enter the quantum realm
Guntaam quantum phabton😂😂😂😂
Hahahahaha, LMAO
Fortunately, it seems that the old man is the only one in the whole of India that has clear mind and vision.
Stay happy in ur dream the rest Indias...
His not old he doing great , I guess your parents never teach you how to respect others
Agniveer means india's capabilities are zero
TRUE
AGNIVEER IS A SCAM
@@dhurjatinarayangiri6995 how come??
@@safashaikh2894 It's not a scam but it will decrease the Quality of fighters in Indian Army
@@safashaikh2894
AGNIVEER is about Getting Cheap Expandable Soldiers
When In reality We need advanced system to Fight
@@dhurjatinarayangiri6995 You indian forest gumps?
Indian army should send more trainees or old generals for refresher course, in Westpoint and MIT, rather than Eaton, Sandhurst or Cambridge
What's in Westpoint and MIT regarding Military course?
Combining AI and Computer sciences with military courses in MIT
@@WhiskeyFatimah Any Indian or Pakistani military officer studies in MIT??
No matter how hard India tries India will never be w
Chinese and Pakistan never try at all. Because they know they are not fighting India. They will be fighting Israel, Russian, France etc
😂😂😂😂😂
Always waiting for your analysis and video.Only facts no propoganda.Great❤🎉
Focus should be to resolve the border issue. Otherwise this issue will be just passed on from one generation to another in both countries and peoples of 2 most populated countries having not good relationship is not good for Asia and for overall world especially developing world as they look forward to both India and China for collaboration in future.
Border issue is very easy so resolve. China wants connectivity while India wants security. By declaring certain disputed areas as buffer zones or economic zones or no military zones this problem can be easily resolved.
There is already an agreement that in areas where there is settled population there will be no changes so Arunachal Pradesh is non negotiable. Same way India must uphold the One China Policy which it has always done and this will help create mutual trust.
Most important thing would be POK. India should let go of POK as it's never gonna come and let's accept this reality and move on. Convert it into international boundary and make kashmir whatever we have into its best version should be the focus.
Otherwise POK is also just politicised from both side of political spectrum whether internally or externally.
Let's show maturity and move forward. If we can solve these issues we can focus on areas of economic development which is more important to every Indian and Pakistani and Chinese and Global South.
Peace 🙏
I don't think China will accept that proposed solution and neither will India. Both countries has grown large enough and so does their ego or self perceived strength. I think peaceful resolution possibility is basically over without huge status change in one or both countries, e.g. one country suddenly in political and social turmoil and is on a civil war. China resolved its border with Russia soon after it broke up post soviet era. At least the serious discussion started then and eventually resolved a few years later. China has also resolved its border issue with most other small nations along its border because the parties were clear on who they are dealing with. Countries backed by the US such as the philipines and Japan won't resolve territorial dispute until the withdrawal of the US from western pacific. US backing also create self perceived strength and ego. I think both nations understood this and both are waiting for the other to suffer large calamity before starting negotiation in earnest. Few nation will sacrifice an inch of their territory if they think they are superior or equal to the others. In fact, China is probably one of the few major nation that is willing to compromise on territories through negotiation. But even then, I don't think the indian side will compromise.
Great insight
Without the border issues alive, India does not have good excuse: 1) to keep distant from China, 2) to play a significant role in Quad, thus asking more tecknology och financial support from the west to develop its economy as so called "other alternative".
India didn't have any border issue before Xi took over. The border accord between India and China was going well till Xi's regime. India had no choice asking help from West
u should replace Xi with ur PM Modi
@@wenyang-hk2pq Indian can change Govt.. unfortunate Chinese can't. I have a few Chinese working with me so I know Chinese running away from China.
@@nirmalbhel3231you are still slaves of the Anglo-Saxon White's Colonails.........!!!!!!!!!! The border issue was the Anglo-Saxon British maked........!!!!!!!!!! If India not stop been stupid and want to take Chinese land you will get smack for sure.........?????!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everytime i listen to Mr Sahwney's video, i need to do it 3 times to understand it fully.. Seems like India will suffer humiliating defeats in its next wars as their doctrine is still Land or army heavy... that is sooooooo outdated😂🤣
Joke of the century 😂😂😂😂😂
In the Ookraine war, both sides use mainly army only.
😂😂That was shown in Galwan😂😂😂😂
India is a superpower, love from China
😂😂😂😂 I love it when India wrote like this … peace ☮️ that what you should post ☮️
India will has no zero chance to cope against China due to geographical and industrial.
Does junkina have man power who have fought any war for the last 30 years, in original situation do you think junkina will be able to match India
Dr Sawhney is really describing the military technologies and capabilities of USA. India is a respectable and strategic regional power. China and India shares a common colonial history as well as trade. They could and should collaborate to enhance their respective economies and security through building bridges, making the world a safer and better place
Excellent sir. So, India is not prepared for war with China . A simplified position (that may also be supported by advanced analysis) may show that there is very low probability of full fledged war with China in next 25/50 years. However, there is high probability of war in near future with Pakistan, so India is preparing to defeat Pakistan in 5/7 days and Indian armed forces preparedness should be seen in this scenario.
So can Pak win that war in future? Will China help Pak? Will it be a Nuclear War??
Pakistan army generals ready to sign surrender papers and Chinese ready to go for cease fire in UNSC 😂😂😂😂
Parveen jee, need of the hour is that Asia and South Asia, has a common enemy of poverty, hunger. Food security, energy security, and enormous population ❤❤ they need to fight this common enemy
Agree absolutely...a most sane comment n thot..
Rgds
as a Chinese we don't want to fight a war with India. let's settle on what we have now. Actually China settled all land border dispute with its neighbors except india.
Dr. Sawhney, have you got connection with the govt of India? Please tell them that they need to take action and be ready for fight. I am a Malaysian and that's my 5 cents worth of comments. Have a great day.
Indian army is like government a blind telling deaf man which way to go.
Good analyses. Sir, please use collar mic.🙏
Good analysis report Mr Pravin. I like real reports like this rather than just name calling.
Great respect to Mr Sawhney who n whom all so-called Political Leaders of Nations should heed d facts of realities. Mr Sawhney is crystal clear of his analysis of d strength of China 🇨🇳 where a war could be fought without boots oñ d ground. Best to let sleeping 🐉 Dragon sleep 😴 💤 Peace be with U ✌️
This video is very hard to translate in Hindi/Urdu or any Indian language because these languages lack the modern warfare terminology/nomenclature. Basic understanding of English is required to understand this video.
I love to see urs views because of urs HONESTY & TRUTH analysis
Sir, as always you are a fountain of knowledge ❤
Damage is already done. India should really stop.
Chinese never started war how will India stop😂😂😂
Very excellent analysis.
Praveen saheb hamare pass feku - Chand hai
That’s enough😂
When we cannot match someone then we have to build a image of ourselves as someone who can outmatch our opponent.
Mr Sawhney. They say "LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS". your narrative is ok but conclusions are cockeyed . This includes few of the comments below, which are totally unprofessional. Please leave this to ARMED FORCES. we are professionals and we know aur strengths and limitations. Please do not misguide INDIAN PUBLIC with your partial mastery over few military terms which your 65 K followers may not understand. Gen Pandey and our leadership is seized of the matter and so far they have proved themselves in an outstanding manner. A word of advice- please avoid commenting on the matters of national security in which you are a brilliant ROOKY. Regards and if you feel I am ready to debate with you not for your sake but for the sake of my brave INDIANS who may lose their self respect just coz of few of of you who are motivated against a great nation i.e India
@@brigadierguidesyou lol 😂
Very thought provoking remarks Sir
China India Pakistan should not fight for few hundred km of mountains. ❤
Name 3 wars that China has fought and won in past 25 years. It will help your audience to verify your claims.
so what 3 wars have india fought and won in the same 25yrs .? None . You are also missing what the video speaker has said . War with China will be different type of war for the reasons he explained. So no country has the experience of fighting this different war. You better not wish for it
Excellent. Most Indians will view thi as negtive.
How does the Russo-Ukraine war compare with a future Sino-India war?
This is something totally new, a weaker power trying to grab land from stronger power and play colonialism.
The deadline is 2048.
@@ParkerAt941 藏南地区实实在在在清朝的地图上，人种也是西藏人。。。印度要吞并文化有差异地区，还迫害小数民族。。。还振振有词的说成自己是受害人。
Can the Chinese cyber weapon also counter the drone attacks.
The scary thing about China is that he never admits defeat and doesn't back down when it gets across his core interests.
Great job. I love it and thank you for spoke the truth
The important issue here is, where are our MAIN priorities Is it in creating our own systems or rely on outsiders who are not reliable. Do we have our focus there, especially the focus of the politicians, or is it elsewhere?
If the scenario outlined here is a possibility, then why has it not been applied in the Ukrainian domain. Surely Russia has capabilities similar to China's?
Is being used by Russia
Industrial capacity. DJI, ring a bell?
the major mistake pravin sawhney is making is that when it comes to space and intelligence & communication is the US presence. But he is right, cyber attack capability & AI is an issue
He said this story many times, nothing new
🎉 L❤OVE your dress - Sir 🎉
The cause of all evil in this world Britton !!!
Law and State Trading Rights for own resources
1. Ban Private banking (Abraham Lincoln first State bank)
Currency conversion by State owned bank - Personal (money changer), State Reserves (forex)
2.
Ban Private ownership of State assets
2. Ban LGBT, Drugs
3. Limit personal wealth
4. Ban tuition (wealth is grades)
5. Ban bonus (bonus for tuition for grades or buy labour products)
6. Blue collar worker hourly wage same as white collar
Remember they are schooled in the very best western military institutions.
When China was founded,Most border lines have been confirmed one meter by one.The China India border line is one of the few that has not been confirmed.
Tibet
If Tibet is freed there is NO China India border
What is the issue with China- land borders. So if China wants this land, then the Chinse has to physically occupy it. The Russia- Ukraine war has shown that despite all the modern technological domains of warfare, the need for boots on the ground has been prime donna. The whole of the nation approach is required in modern war. China is powerful but it too has limitations. Mr Sawhney has a point but it is an exaggerated view.
He said minimal boots. And god knows what the chinese are cooking up in their vibratn defence complex, maybe they deploy robots to fight india in war like the once in the hollywood movie terminator.
Truths hurts lol 😅
Even America don't dare to confront China. You can guess how powerful Chinese is.
@@aungaisum8654: CCP doesnt dare collect its debt from Iron Brother Pakistan. Pak Army is the strongest.
❤❤ CV ost to benefit ratio is very low in war among India Pakistan and China
From the occasional verbiage, it appears they don't even understand themselves. If they do, they won't be talking nonsense 😂😂
As if you know.
INFOAMATIVE V.LOG ABOUT LATEST TECHNOLOGIES OF POWER.😮
Great analysis.
China wants Arunachal Pradesh . It has water resources and China needs water . Apart from that China wants to control Andaman to secure energy lines .
China wants a skirmish just like 1962 so that india can be kept under its thumb.
As India develops economically it will be difficult for China in future . It’s either now or never .
Can China afford to go for a war with India ?
India can hold off China in case of skirmish , but if the war goes on for a year or 2 , will India or China sustain ?
The economy in both countries will collapse and we all will become poor .
Sir, Star link. Look Ukraine they still have faster internet than ours during peak of the war.
War front par arunachal v Ladakh me OFC cable network bichhana chahiye ese hi alternative land communication ka jal har jegah bichana chahiye jisko mobile communication se rakh kar alg kathin hai asambhav nehi jiska hal
Haan bhai,sari Warfare knowledge apke paas hi h. Baki toh bechare Picnic ke liye aye hue h.
Just by the name we know it’s not Chinese, who gave this one to draw any lines?
Modi knows all this. Issue is if he admits, he is going home -
permanently for he only talks unrealistic smack
War talks gain voted for Indian politicians.
Himalayan mountains are a permanent border between India and China, it would be foolish for China to capture and retain territory in India. Their aim is simply to maintain an offensive form of Defense.
Border conflict doesn’t mean war.
But will something like this possible? Can it happen?
Sir plz vlog on pak ship 🚢 nuclear materials
There are rumours that you were court marshalled . Is it true
No but I know who has rape allegations against him while calling himself a patriot
Double Agent. Work for RAW & collect information acting as friend with enemy countries & pass on information to RAW. Useful RAW mole😂
Dear sir, we need more people like you in the world to maintain peace. With your understanding of the situation, most leaders of various countries will be more willing to compromise and negotiate. China has no intention to fight with India, but I’m worried that the Indians may be encouraged by external support to do so like Ukraine.
Understand what? A non aggression pact & that's elementary inn'it. The reason for the Chinese behaviours correlate directly with the Americans military build ups, a missile siege actually with PLA entranced assumptions of India getting on the action if the Americans start a military conflict.
EXPLAIN IT IN RESPECT OF MIGHTY RUSSIA AND WEAK UKRAINE WAR.
I really don't see a good future of North east.
How do you know that war will be fought in North East? Did galwan happen in North East? Don't be a joker.
white collar, blue collar
knowledge , labour
bonus, hourly wage
private owners , public owner
land owner, farmer
Only way is India changes its nuclear doctrine, it should be first use policy similar to the posture Pakistan has for India and it should be given for both Pakistan as well as China in case of threat from either.
change to first use and what? what do you expect China to do? be afraid of India?
@@turtlesoup8134 it's called revision and enhancement of your existing deterrence,. After that India would just expect China to do nothing. Being afraid or not is in their scope of control. Just see the whole region, who can be best ally for China, and dont say Pakistan unless you are a Pakistani
@@REGHat-c7q Why would a first use policy be more of a deterrence than a no first use policy? I assure your it made zero difference when it comes to nukes. Russia has first use policy, so does the US. Does it deter the houthis? or make the ukranian scared of russia? Country won't be scared of nukes especially when they also have nukes. It just means that they won't use it first if the other side has one too. Essentially, all countries have an unofficial no first use policy against other nuke power.
@@turtlesoup8134 so would you say similar outcomes might have come in current Ukraine-Russia scenario if Ukraine had nukes with first use policy? its always about having a stick who has a bigger one is next level discussion and who uses it to beat or just to threaten the other. India should use same policy towards China as Pakistan uses towards India there is no other way considering we are neighbors with big differences.
I don't know anything about defence, but i don't believe Indian defence forces is that much ignorant, or it will be that easy for Chinese as stated in the video.
Well we cannot ignore the capabilities that the chinese possess. India is certainly at the backfoot here given the lack of operational capabilities. Given that it is presumed "EASY" for the chinese.
India will disintegrate because of Chanakya policy towards neighbours.
It will be called Karma for 1971.