Thanks Martin. I have been in the hunt to add a 2nd $4k+ mic to our studio. We have a Blue Bottle with the B0,B6,and B7 caps. I love the bottle. That said we added the REDD and are very happy with it. Thanks for your comments thay helped.
I'm so glad for you Bill. I've been helped so many times by experienced gearheads who've been incredibly generous with their knowledge. I began doing these videos to return the favor, sort of paying it forward. Good luck with your new Chandler!
Was looking for some REDD mic recordings and stumbled upon this. I'm still checking the REDD, but Martin is a keeper in my music library. Great music, great voice, awesome lyrics.
Thanks so much Alejandro, I miss the REDD a lot, just couldn't afford it at the time. Good luck in your mic search. My new album was just released if you'd like to check it out, store.cdbaby.com/cd/martinjohnbutler12
I have 2 REDD 47 preamp. It’s the finest preamp I’ve ever used. It makes mid tier mics sound great. I want this chandler mic but do you think it is worth it if I already have the preamp?
That's a great question. I do believe that eliminating the preamp cabling has a subtle but important effect on the tone you get when compared to a proper preamp. I would say it gains in transparency. That realism made it easier for me to sing because even when singing softly, I could still hear every nuance. Preamp or not, I think it's the best mic being made today. If you find you no longer need the preamp, then you can actually recoup some of your losses by selling it. Good luck. Let me know how it goes if you get one.
I have used a very simple single path because I was demoing the mic, I didn’t want to add much. So that is just the mic into the UAD Apollo with a little bit of reverb. Back then it was probably 480 XL for the little touch of reverb.. Today I would use the liquid sonics. That’s the only plug in used. I agree it’s just astonishing, the low level details are amazing .
Sound great. The Vox on the Christmas song sound perfect.Gorgeous. Sounds like c12 up close. The drive circuit sounds fab.. until it pushes a bit too much for me on the chorus.
Thanks for the great review Martin! I actually own the Soyuz 0-17 with the help of your review on that mic, which I love! I was curious as to more of your thoughts on the Soyuz vs the Chandler and if you think It is worth it to upgrade or extra difference in price for the Chandler over the Soyuz. I am still learning but I find myself having to eq and comp a bit more than I like still with the Soyuz. Sounds like with the Chandler less of this may be needed. Anyway love both mics, thanks for your help!
Hey Greg, it all depends on what you need or like. The 0-17 is similar to a U67, but smoother. The Chandler can be more versatile. You can use the REDD preamp to get that sound, or use your own. The Chandler has more highs than most high end mics, so you might find yourself EQ'ing that one too. The built in preamp improves transparency. It made me sing better. The Chandler has the presence the great Neumann's have. See if you can audition one.
Thanks so much ghostnotebeats, that's much appreciated. For video demos I keep it simple. On full productions I might use different processors, but for these tracks, I used the Chandler directly into my Apollo 8, (remember, the Chandler has the REDD 47 preamp built in), no EQ at all. I put a pinch of the Liquid Sonics 7th Heaven reverb on a send, (it's a Bricasti plug-in), then I use the UAD EMT-140 tape sim on the 2 bus. I might use a little of the Waves L2 or 3 if I need more level for posting, since these aren't mastered tracks yet, and that's it. For gear demos or shootouts, less is usually more.
It all depends upon your situation. For some, $4,500 can buy a small studio with some well chosen less expensive mics like the new Lewitt's. For others, it's a bargain, considering they don't necessarily have to get a vintage mic that costs $15,000 now. The only mic for me that would make me pause to think and consider would be a vintage U67, but that's typically $12,000 or more.
Yes, thanks Jonny, sometimes I mix up the numbers. I do use the EMT 140, but only in headphones while tracking, rarely on a track. For reverb I use either the Liquid Sonics 7th Heaven or the ReLab XL480. I use the ATR 102 on the 2 bus of almost every track I do.
Thanks Julian. When I got Charlie, he was a rescue. I wasn't sure how he'd behave when I was recording or teaching, and now when I work, he just lays down quietly at my feet.
Thanks Vincent. It takes times to become really familiar with a mic, but as I've been using some other very good mics since sending the REDD back, they're just not quite as finished and balanced as the REDD. Hopefully I can get one someday. It gave me confidence the vocal was as good as I can get it to be.
That's an interesting question because the REDD has the preamp circuit built in. I really don't know. I'll see if I can find out. As far as recording, you can do anything you do with your other mics with the REDD. I don't remember much about the Contour. I don't own one, so you'd have to ask Chandler or someone who has one.
I wish I had the Chandler. It was sent to me on loan to try, I wasn't able to afford to buy one. I think of the Soyuz as a slightly smoother/warmer U67, a great mic in its own right. I think of the Chandler as the mic to buy if you want a real U47 or ELA M 251 but don't have 20G's to indulge that fantasy. I personally would actually buy the Chandler, even if I had 20 G's for a mic. I use the Stam Audio SA67 as my main vocal mic now, and it's kick ass.
@@ConstantinoOfficial Yes. I believe the way the Chandler is directly connected to the REDD preamp circuitry creates more transparency versus the standard set up of Mic> Preamp > Interface.
Thank you for that video. This mic seems really wonderful. I don't have that kind of money, but is it worth waiting and get this mic instead of a Peluso or a Neumann ?
Hi Michel, the Chandler is too expensive for me too. But, for those people thinking on a vintage mic like a U47 or U67, the Chandler is definitely in that class, and is much less expensive in comparison. I'd buy it on a minute if I could.
@@martinjohnbutler Hello again (4 years later) I finally made the plunge and ordered the Chandler Redd microphone. I should get it within 4 to 6 weeks, I'm looking forward to it. It's always a pleasure to watch again and again your video about this mic, and I wish I had a wonderful voice like yours...
Hi, This is the best demo of the mic out there. Question please: How far back from the mic were you singing on the first Christmas tune? Reason I ask is I've heard that the sweet spot is 1-3 feet away. I find that problematic depending on the singer due to a too roomy sound or reflections. (Listen to a major chains demo of this; horrible roomy sound that doesn't show the mic in a good light) Yours sounded perfect. Closed sound, no room. So, just wondering . Thanks in advance.
One great thing about the Chandler REDD is that it doesn't seem to weaken the way other mics do as you move back, somehow it stays focused and full bodied. I'm in the worst possible recording environment. I have a laundry room below me, an elevator motor next door and a mail room 5' from my door as well as the typical NYC noise outside, dogs and sirens and planes, etc. I would say I might have been 4" further back than I typically stand with my other mics, but it didn't seem to pick up any more room than usual. I know, it kind of defies logic, but Chandler has done something special here. I wish I had been able to buy the demo mic. It would have saved me a lot of time and stress trying to find something equally good sounding I can afford.
@@martinjohnbutler Thanks. I'm considering it. I am vacillating between it and a reissue u67. Did you ever finish the Christmas song? Really nice tune with emotion.
@@mannixmusicmixingmastering8652 Thanks. If possible, audition both mics. The Chandler does give you more options, use the built in preamp or use our own, plus the Drive circuit is very cool. Here's a link to the finished "Champagne Christmas": soundcloud.com/martin-john-butler/a-champagne-christmas-sa67
Hi Darryl, that's a tough call. The Soyuz might be called a little "warmer", in the way it is super smooth, like the best ELam 251's, but the Chandler is the most transparent mic I've ever heard. To me, the REDD is like the best U67 you ever heard, but even better because of the built in preamp making the signal chain more direct. It's transparent in the way the low level details are so intelligible, with such beautiful tone, that your singing improves just using it. I found I could sing much more softly without the need for compression to bring up the volume in quiet sections, those parts remained perfectly audible and more natural. At this price range I would suggest you find a way to audition them both and see which is the better fit for your voice. If it's for a studio, and not your personal mic, I might lean toward the Chandler. Here's a link to a track I did with the Soyuz 0-17, it might help you to make a comparison. ruclips.net/video/i5iIDITlL9o/видео.html
Hello Marin, thanks for sharing. Did you used any outboard gear for processing? I like that vocal sounds huge but I want to divide a mic sound from effects just for myself. What chain(plugins etc) was used on the first track? What's your overall experience - how versatile Reed microphone during post-processing?
Hi Dmiti, the Chandler has the REDD preamp built in, so it's a two for one situation. You can dial it back and use another preamp, but that sort of defeats the purpose. It sounds incredible with it on. For these tracks, I used zero processing, other than adding reverb. I could probably have tweaked it a bit more, but I think for demos and comparisons, flat with a slight touch of reverb works best. The REDD is the most mix ready mic I've ever used. It truly is in the same league as the Neumann U47, U67, E LAM 251, and others, in fact, I prefer it to any other new mic being produced today, and I have some fantastic mics that I love. It was a bit out of my price range, or I would have bought it in a minute.
@@martinjohnbutler Hi Martin, thank you for your reply. Cold you specify it was any type of plugin or outboard reverb? And one more question: I think it's possible to chain a low-levels of reed build-in preamp with an external preamp like neve or tube tech etc pre for extra color or other tones - Did you try it yourself? Any good results experimenting with pres?
@@dmitribolt7060 Hi Dmitri, I didn't have time to experiment with other preamps. There's a Drive circuit on the REDD that adds harmonic color. That alone was enough to give me a wide range of tonal choices. Yes, you can use any preamp you like by turning the REDD preamp to zero. I would imagine using a different preamp would yield similar results to using that preamp with a Neumann U47 or U67. The REDD preamp is such an integral part of the Chandler though, and once you hear it, it's unlikely you'd look for a different preamp, but of course, whatever works for you. I used only the Liquid Sonics Seventh Heaven reverb. That's a Bricasti style plug-in. Typically I use a combination of two or three reverbs, but for this demo, I kept it plain and simple, so you could hear the mic.
Alright man you got attention with this demo. A few question because I'm not clear on a few things. What all instruments in this demo did you cut with the mic? Everything sounds huge. Can you give me a run down of your drum setup, mic placement etc? Sounds killer bro. Thanks. JH
Thanks Jeremy, glad to give you the details. The Chandler was on all acoustic guitars and vocals. All drums were Superior Drummer 2, sometimes the NY kit, sometimes the Americana kit. Piano was by Mark Rabuck using a Blackspade UM-17B mic, which is similar to a U47. I played bass direct. What I think is giving the tracks their vibe is first, the beautiful Chandler REDD, next the crazy good Stam Audio SA73 preamp, (a Neve 1073 clone), and then the Liquid Sonics 7th Heaven reverb plug-in that uses Bricasti algorithms. That reverb is so clean and big, added to the sparse arrangements, it gives a huge sense of space that especially compliments the big and intimate Chandler, and the incredible sound quality surprises me too! I use the UAD Apollo interface, Stam Audio SA73 preamp. On the final mix 2 bus, I use UAD's ATR-102 tape emulation, and Waves L2 for a little compression, but not much.The first track, "Champagne Christmas" was also mastered using ARIA online mastering type D. The Chandler's an A list artist mic, for sure. To get near this sound on a budget, don't despair, I've heard a few seriously good mics lately under $1,000. The Lewitt 640 sounds great, like a 414 with a better low end, the Roswell Delphos has a fantastic vibe, kind of U87-ish, the Warm Audio WA47 is really nice too. I'm getting a Stam Audio SA67 soon, it's a little more expensive, but that should keep me happy for quite a while ;-) Obviously, I'd love to have the Chandler too if I could afford it.
Just wanted to give you a heads up on a vocal mic I recently discovered which is a Miktek C7. If you get a chance to demo this mic I believe you will be impressed.
Thanks LJ. My friend Shannon at Mic Rehab does some modifications to the Miktek, and they do sound really good. Recently I was sent a Roswell Delphos, and that thing had vibe for days. I'm in good shape for mics with the Avantone CV-95 and the Soyuz 0-19. I have the Warm WA47 here on loan right now and it's really good. So the thing I look for now is a unique quality, or a sound that's equal to the best vintage mics.So far, the REDD's my first choice, but it's out of my price range right now. The iO Audio mod for the U87 and TLM 67 is superb, but I'm waiting to try the upcoming Stam SA67 before making a final decision on my main vocal mic. I'm very compatible with k67 style capsules, and I know Stam does a great job so we'll see.
Hi David, that was a demo model sent to me to try out. Unfortunately, I couldn't quite afford to buy one for myself. I have some great mics, but I've never stopped wishing I had the Chandler. That mic sounded so right you didn't have to think about it, you plugged it in and sounded world class instantly.
@@martinjohnbutler I understand! yeah its really seems to have that "wow" factor that i only think i heard on the right voice with a 251 or 47. I will propably go for the red or a bock 251.
@@martinjohnbutler Okay so i actually did get the chance to try one out in a session. The Redd really have that wow factor... So hard to decide if i should get a u87ai now and save up later for a neve1073. Or stay with my Slate for the moment and get a Redd with the inbuilt preamp in the next 1.5 year. The nice thing with my country is that the u87ai is "only" 2400 Dollars wheres the Redd is 5500 dollars so that makes the decision iven harder haha
@@Daviddosi Good luck David. The 87 is a workhorse, it won't let you down. The REDD is more like getting one of the classic vintage mics at $5,000 instead of $15,000.
Best. Mic. Ever. Secret weapon! had it over a year now, no regrets!
I think it's the best mic being produced today.
Sounds perfect on your voice. Absolutely larger than life.
Thanks Tareq. I wish I could afford one, I absolutely loved it.
Thanks Martin. I have been in the hunt to add a 2nd $4k+ mic to our studio. We have a Blue Bottle with the B0,B6,and B7 caps. I love the bottle. That said we added the REDD and are very happy with it. Thanks for your comments thay helped.
I'm so glad for you Bill. I've been helped so many times by experienced gearheads who've been incredibly generous with their knowledge. I began doing these videos to return the favor, sort of paying it forward. Good luck with your new Chandler!
Big fan of your voice buddy, truly amazing
Thanks Joshua, coming from you that's truly appreciated.
Thanks Martin; useful review. The recording and performances sound great.
Thanks Arthur, that's much appreciated.
Re-visiting this, a great microphone but an even greater voice. You are truly amazing Martin, I miss you man!!!
Can't wait for you to come to Nashville! I'm still loving my Stam SA-67!
Thank you mr. Martin John Butler fourth a grade video this microphone does everything you said and more it is a great microphone😎🎤
MY pleasure George. I'm glad you're enjoying the mic!
Was looking for some REDD mic recordings and stumbled upon this. I'm still checking the REDD, but Martin is a keeper in my music library. Great music, great voice, awesome lyrics.
Thanks so much Alejandro, I miss the REDD a lot, just couldn't afford it at the time. Good luck in your mic search. My new album was just released if you'd like to check it out, store.cdbaby.com/cd/martinjohnbutler12
Hey Martin! would you prefer it over the Ela m 251?
I just got the mic today and I'm pumped to trying.
Congratulations FerL !
Sounds amazing! Ever tried the TG Mic?
I have 2 REDD 47 preamp. It’s the finest preamp I’ve ever used. It makes mid tier mics sound great. I want this chandler mic but do you think it is worth it if I already have the preamp?
That's a great question. I do believe that eliminating the preamp cabling has a subtle but important effect on the tone you get when compared to a proper preamp. I would say it gains in transparency. That realism made it easier for me to sing because even when singing softly, I could still hear every nuance. Preamp or not, I think it's the best mic being made today. If you find you no longer need the preamp, then you can actually recoup some of your losses by selling it. Good luck. Let me know how it goes if you get one.
what settings were used on the microphone for that christmas song geez incredible
I have used a very simple single path because I was demoing the mic, I didn’t want to add much. So that is just the mic into the UAD Apollo with a little bit of reverb. Back then it was probably 480 XL for the little touch of reverb..
Today I would use the liquid sonics. That’s the only plug in used. I agree it’s just astonishing, the low level details are amazing .
Sound great. The Vox on the Christmas song sound perfect.Gorgeous. Sounds like c12 up close. The drive circuit sounds fab.. until it pushes a bit too much for me on the chorus.
Thanks WizardsMachine. I had the drive circuit a little too hot because I was experimenting. Just a pinch lower and it was amazing .
Really helpful review, thank you!
Thank Nick, that's much appreciated.
Thanks for the great review Martin! I actually own the Soyuz 0-17 with the help of your review on that mic, which I love! I was curious as to more of your thoughts on the Soyuz vs the Chandler and if you think It is worth it to upgrade or extra difference in price for the Chandler over the Soyuz. I am still learning but I find myself having to eq and comp a bit more than I like still with the Soyuz. Sounds like with the Chandler less of this may be needed. Anyway love both mics, thanks for your help!
Hey Greg, it all depends on what you need or like. The 0-17 is similar to a U67, but smoother. The Chandler can be more versatile. You can use the REDD preamp to get that sound, or use your own. The Chandler has more highs than most high end mics, so you might find yourself EQ'ing that one too. The built in preamp improves transparency. It made me sing better. The Chandler has the presence the great Neumann's have. See if you can audition one.
Thank you so much for that!!!
You are so welcome!
just want to say your mix game is on point.....what was the vocal chain
Thanks so much ghostnotebeats, that's much appreciated. For video demos I keep it simple. On full productions I might use different processors, but for these tracks, I used the Chandler directly into my Apollo 8, (remember, the Chandler has the REDD 47 preamp built in), no EQ at all. I put a pinch of the Liquid Sonics 7th Heaven reverb on a send, (it's a Bricasti plug-in), then I use the UAD EMT-140 tape sim on the 2 bus. I might use a little of the Waves L2 or 3 if I need more level for posting, since these aren't mastered tracks yet, and that's it. For gear demos or shootouts, less is usually more.
brillaint sir guess I'm going to have to give my right arm for this mic...lol sound like a awesome investment
It all depends upon your situation. For some, $4,500 can buy a small studio with some well chosen less expensive mics like the new Lewitt's. For others, it's a bargain, considering they don't necessarily have to get a vintage mic that costs $15,000 now. The only mic for me that would make me pause to think and consider would be a vintage U67, but that's typically $12,000 or more.
EMT 140 is a plate reverb, not tape sim. Did you mean the ATR 102?
Yes, thanks Jonny, sometimes I mix up the numbers. I do use the EMT 140, but only in headphones while tracking, rarely on a track. For reverb I use either the Liquid Sonics 7th Heaven or the ReLab XL480. I use the ATR 102 on the 2 bus of almost every track I do.
Sounds great, Martin... Thanks! haha, Charlie is cool! :D
Thanks Julian. When I got Charlie, he was a rescue. I wasn't sure how he'd behave when I was recording or teaching, and now when I work, he just lays down quietly at my feet.
haha, mine does the same. Dogs are the best! :D
Love that!
Nice video Martin. I just release my video showcasing the Chandler Limited REDD on crooning and operatic vocals.
Thanks Vincent, I'll check it out later.
Martin John Butler I’ve heard a number of Mics on your voice now. The REDD does something really special on your voice.
Thanks Vincent. It takes times to become really familiar with a mic, but as I've been using some other very good mics since sending the REDD back, they're just not quite as finished and balanced as the REDD. Hopefully I can get one someday. It gave me confidence the vocal was as good as I can get it to be.
can you plug it in a compressor directly when tracking? what about the lo cut (low contour) does it cut enough lows away. thanks
That's an interesting question because the REDD has the preamp circuit built in. I really don't know. I'll see if I can find out. As far as recording, you can do anything you do with your other mics with the REDD. I don't remember much about the Contour. I don't own one, so you'd have to ask Chandler or someone who has one.
still in love ? vs the U67 you love ?
Hi, do you still use this and what do you think of this compared to the Soyuz 017?
I wish I had the Chandler. It was sent to me on loan to try, I wasn't able to afford to buy one. I think of the Soyuz as a slightly smoother/warmer U67, a great mic in its own right. I think of the Chandler as the mic to buy if you want a real U47 or ELA M 251 but don't have 20G's to indulge that fantasy. I personally would actually buy the Chandler, even if I had 20 G's for a mic. I use the Stam Audio SA67 as my main vocal mic now, and it's kick ass.
@@martinjohnbutler Thanks for the reply fantastic
So would you personally take the Chandler over the Soyuz?
@@ConstantinoOfficial Yes. I believe the way the Chandler is directly connected to the REDD preamp circuitry creates more transparency versus the standard set up of Mic> Preamp > Interface.
Thank you for that video. This mic seems really wonderful. I don't have that kind of money, but is it worth waiting and get this mic instead of a Peluso or a Neumann ?
Hi Michel, the Chandler is too expensive for me too. But, for those people thinking on a vintage mic like a U47 or U67, the Chandler is definitely in that class, and is much less expensive in comparison. I'd buy it on a minute if I could.
yes. absolutely
@@martinjohnbutler Hello again (4 years later) I finally made the plunge and ordered the Chandler Redd microphone. I should get it within 4 to 6 weeks, I'm looking forward to it.
It's always a pleasure to watch again and again your video about this mic, and I wish I had a wonderful voice like yours...
Hi, This is the best demo of the mic out there. Question please: How far back from the mic were you singing on the first Christmas tune? Reason I ask is I've heard that the sweet spot is 1-3 feet away. I find that problematic depending on the singer due to a too roomy sound or reflections. (Listen to a major chains demo of this; horrible roomy sound that doesn't show the mic in a good light) Yours sounded perfect. Closed sound, no room. So, just wondering . Thanks in advance.
One great thing about the Chandler REDD is that it doesn't seem to weaken the way other mics do as you move back, somehow it stays focused and full bodied. I'm in the worst possible recording environment. I have a laundry room below me, an elevator motor next door and a mail room 5' from my door as well as the typical NYC noise outside, dogs and sirens and planes, etc. I would say I might have been 4" further back than I typically stand with my other mics, but it didn't seem to pick up any more room than usual. I know, it kind of defies logic, but Chandler has done something special here. I wish I had been able to buy the demo mic. It would have saved me a lot of time and stress trying to find something equally good sounding I can afford.
@@martinjohnbutler Thanks. I'm considering it. I am vacillating between it and a reissue u67. Did you ever finish the Christmas song? Really nice tune with emotion.
@@mannixmusicmixingmastering8652 Thanks. If possible, audition both mics. The Chandler does give you more options, use the built in preamp or use our own, plus the Drive circuit is very cool. Here's a link to the finished "Champagne Christmas": soundcloud.com/martin-john-butler/a-champagne-christmas-sa67
Between this or the Soyuz 017 tube any suggestions?
Hi Darryl, that's a tough call. The Soyuz might be called a little "warmer", in the way it is super smooth, like the best ELam 251's, but the Chandler is the most transparent mic I've ever heard. To me, the REDD is like the best U67 you ever heard, but even better because of the built in preamp making the signal chain more direct. It's transparent in the way the low level details are so intelligible, with such beautiful tone, that your singing improves just using it. I found I could sing much more softly without the need for compression to bring up the volume in quiet sections, those parts remained perfectly audible and more natural. At this price range I would suggest you find a way to audition them both and see which is the better fit for your voice. If it's for a studio, and not your personal mic, I might lean toward the Chandler. Here's a link to a track I did with the Soyuz 0-17, it might help you to make a comparison. ruclips.net/video/i5iIDITlL9o/видео.html
The redd mic sounds better then The 017.
Great voice.
Thanks so much Sean, that's much appreciated.
Hello Marin, thanks for sharing. Did you used any outboard gear for processing? I like that vocal sounds huge but I want to divide a mic sound from effects just for myself. What chain(plugins etc) was used on the first track? What's your overall experience - how versatile Reed microphone during post-processing?
Hi Dmiti, the Chandler has the REDD preamp built in, so it's a two for one situation. You can dial it back and use another preamp, but that sort of defeats the purpose. It sounds incredible with it on. For these tracks, I used zero processing, other than adding reverb. I could probably have tweaked it a bit more, but I think for demos and comparisons, flat with a slight touch of reverb works best. The REDD is the most mix ready mic I've ever used. It truly is in the same league as the Neumann U47, U67, E LAM 251, and others, in fact, I prefer it to any other new mic being produced today, and I have some fantastic mics that I love. It was a bit out of my price range, or I would have bought it in a minute.
@@martinjohnbutler Hi Martin, thank you for your reply. Cold you specify it was any type of plugin or outboard reverb? And one more question: I think it's possible to chain a low-levels of reed build-in preamp with an external preamp like neve or tube tech etc pre for extra color or other tones - Did you try it yourself? Any good results experimenting with pres?
@@dmitribolt7060 Hi Dmitri, I didn't have time to experiment with other preamps. There's a Drive circuit on the REDD that adds harmonic color. That alone was enough to give me a wide range of tonal choices. Yes, you can use any preamp you like by turning the REDD preamp to zero. I would imagine using a different preamp would yield similar results to using that preamp with a Neumann U47 or U67. The REDD preamp is such an integral part of the Chandler though, and once you hear it, it's unlikely you'd look for a different preamp, but of course, whatever works for you. I used only the Liquid Sonics Seventh Heaven reverb. That's a Bricasti style plug-in. Typically I use a combination of two or three reverbs, but for this demo, I kept it plain and simple, so you could hear the mic.
@@martinjohnbutler Got it, Martin, thanks a lot for sharing that. Wish you all the best!
Alright man you got attention with this demo. A few question because I'm not clear on a few things. What all instruments in this demo did you cut with the mic? Everything sounds huge. Can you give me a run down of your drum setup, mic placement etc? Sounds killer bro. Thanks. JH
Thanks Jeremy, glad to give you the details. The Chandler was on all acoustic guitars and vocals. All drums were Superior Drummer 2, sometimes the NY kit, sometimes the Americana kit. Piano was by Mark Rabuck using a Blackspade UM-17B mic, which is similar to a U47. I played bass direct. What I think is giving the tracks their vibe is first, the beautiful Chandler REDD, next the crazy good Stam Audio SA73 preamp, (a Neve 1073 clone), and then the Liquid Sonics 7th Heaven reverb plug-in that uses Bricasti algorithms. That reverb is so clean and big, added to the sparse arrangements, it gives a huge sense of space that especially compliments the big and intimate Chandler, and the incredible sound quality surprises me too!
I use the UAD Apollo interface, Stam Audio SA73 preamp. On the final mix 2 bus, I use UAD's ATR-102 tape emulation, and Waves L2 for a little compression, but not much.The first track, "Champagne Christmas" was also mastered using ARIA online mastering type D. The Chandler's an A list artist mic, for sure. To get near this sound on a budget, don't despair, I've heard a few seriously good mics lately under $1,000. The Lewitt 640 sounds great, like a 414 with a better low end, the Roswell Delphos has a fantastic vibe, kind of U87-ish, the Warm Audio WA47 is really nice too. I'm getting a Stam Audio SA67 soon, it's a little more expensive, but that should keep me happy for quite a while ;-) Obviously, I'd love to have the Chandler too if I could afford it.
Thanks man!
Another great review on a fantastic mic! Now you are going to cost me more money lol. By the way your vocal sounds a bit like Pierce Pettis.
Thanks LJ, and as for reminding you of Pierce Pettis, that's good company to be in, so thanks again.
Just wanted to give you a heads up on a vocal mic I recently discovered which is a Miktek C7. If you get a chance to demo this mic I believe you will be impressed.
Thanks LJ. My friend Shannon at Mic Rehab does some modifications to the Miktek, and they do sound really good. Recently I was sent a Roswell Delphos, and that thing had vibe for days. I'm in good shape for mics with the Avantone CV-95 and the Soyuz 0-19. I have the Warm WA47 here on loan right now and it's really good. So the thing I look for now is a unique quality, or a sound that's equal to the best vintage mics.So far, the REDD's my first choice, but it's out of my price range right now. The iO Audio mod for the U87 and TLM 67 is superb, but I'm waiting to try the upcoming Stam SA67 before making a final decision on my main vocal mic. I'm very compatible with k67 style capsules, and I know Stam does a great job so we'll see.
Sounds great man! Do you still like the Redd as much after this years?
Hi David, that was a demo model sent to me to try out. Unfortunately, I couldn't quite afford to buy one for myself. I have some great mics, but I've never stopped wishing I had the Chandler. That mic sounded so right you didn't have to think about it, you plugged it in and sounded world class instantly.
@@martinjohnbutler I understand! yeah its really seems to have that "wow" factor that i only think i heard on the right voice with a 251 or 47. I will propably go for the red or a bock 251.
@@martinjohnbutler Okay so i actually did get the chance to try one out in a session. The Redd really have that wow factor... So hard to decide if i should get a u87ai now and save up later for a neve1073. Or stay with my Slate for the moment and get a Redd with the inbuilt preamp in the next 1.5 year. The nice thing with my country is that the u87ai is "only" 2400 Dollars wheres the Redd is 5500 dollars so that makes the decision iven harder haha
@@Daviddosi Good luck David. The 87 is a workhorse, it won't let you down. The REDD is more like getting one of the classic vintage mics at $5,000 instead of $15,000.
шикарные мики
Please show us Charlie!! xD
Here ya go! ruclips.net/video/gjUUA8-pI1o/видео.html