@@recklessglitch I'm waiting on your 4 second video, where you explain a beginner what it is and show how to use it on premiere pro. Keep up the good work brother.
Finally! Someone who can explain not only WHAT these two things are, but can explain WHY you would use one vs. the other in different situations!!! Thank You!
I stumbled onto your tutorial and... WOW! Soooo glad I clicked play! I appreciate the way you dive right in without wasting time. Your instructions are perfectly understandable and easy to follow. Thank you for creating this video - I look forward to watching many more.
THANK YOU SO MUCH! This is how a video should be! To the point and relevant to the issue presented. I hated nests because of the compression, they are good for somethings but can be very limiting too. I’m going to start making subsequences now for what I need. THANK YOU!!!
I was literally asking myself what the difference between these 2 sequences are... 2 minutes later, I typed out my query, saw your video on top of the search and clicked on it immediately haha! Thanks for the clear explanation.
So basically the subsequence creates a copy of the elements and throws them inside a new sequence. If this is so I'd rather have it called "Copy elements and create new sequence" because "subsequence" implies a hierarchy between the original sequence and the new sequence, but seemingly there is none.
Oh man, now I'm confused about Groups and Subsequences, and I'll have to take a better look at subsequences considering what you said about it. Nested Sequences are exactly what I was looking for though, Thank you
groups is just linking selected items locally on CURRENT timeline as opposed to subsequence being an independent item, groups are good for syncing segments in your timeline so when you drag a clip within a group, the entire group follows and doesn't break that sync, local segment control basically, while a subsequence can be something you use quite often and just copy paste it alot like show openers and closers and such, i don't know how to explain it further
subsequences are useful when you want the video to follow two different directions. Example : you're making two RUclips videos, they have the same content, but one have graphics in English and the other in Spanish. Just make the full video, and when you're adding graphics, make one subsequence to Spanish, and the main one will be in English.
I've never used a sub-sequence, and now that I heard you describe it, I am not sure that I ever would. Nests, on the other hand, are a really useful tool that I use all the time - sort of a quick way to effectively get a (limited) version of an AE style "pre-comp" within Premiere. But it sounds like a Sub-Sequence is just a way to save a version of the timeline - and wouldn't it be more efficient and effective to just duplicate and version out the sequence. It's just hard to imagine a scenario where a sub-sequence would be a good option. Am I missing something?
I know this is an old comment but I'm going to respond in case anyone sees this now and is curious. I'm intermediate-ish in Premiere and just learning some advanced editing techniques. After watching this, subsequences are exactly what I was looking to do with a current project. I'm editing 3 hours of footage down to a "highlight reel". However, I'm doing a version for the client and then a fancier, more experimental cut for myself (as practice for other techniques that the client doesn't necessarily want or care about). The director's cut, you could say. I think saving my selects as a subsequence is a good option because I can then just come back to the subsequence quickly and edit from there. It feels faster/better to do it that way because it's just a right click away and isn't saving it as a separate project file. That's my thinking anyway.
@@killerqueendopamine Thanks for the comment, subsequences are actually exactly what I have been looking for. Sometimes, I want to play with my video edit, but don't want to screw up the original. So I end up with a bunch of separate projects all of the same set of clips edited differently. It seems like making a subsequence, will keep my work flow more tidy.
I'm wondering if this would help me if my sequence is bogged down and using too much RAM. I am already using proxy files. Actually I feel like the proxies made the project slower.
This is great!!! I have one additional question though....If I have added effects and edits to a video clip in a sequence that I would like to perhaps save for another use later on...is there a quick way (outside of exporting that out as a new video clip ) to simply save it as a new video right there inside of the project or is that really only done through an actual exporting of the sequence through the traditional export and render function? OR ..... is it possible to copy and paste a subsequenced clip from one project to another?
Thank you, this was very helpful. If you have one main sequence that contains several sub sequences and you make a change to one of the sub-sequences that alters the length, is there an easy way to update the main sequence?
At 1.56 when you demonstrate the zoom, why does it look like the position is also key framed as it looks like the smaller clip is moving up screen as it zooms then suddenly changes direction. My premiere Pro has started doing this also and Adobe claim they don't know what I'm talking about.
There's one more important thing about subsequences that bothers me. Usually i use the subsequence to separete teasers of my videos and edit it in a different timeline, but the subsequence starts in the original time of the first sequence. So, the new sequence doesn't start in 00:00:00:00. Is there any way to change it, and make the new sequence start at 00?
Useless explanation of the subsequence. Does not clear its purpose. Especially once you get to know that if you change anything in the SUB sequence the changes won't reveal to that subsequence in the main sequence.
I love it when an instructor just comes down to the point with no bs.
Thank you!
Hasan, same here brother! No life stories or what they had for lunch etc...just a quick intro and then right to it!
Huh? Nested sequences ARE subsequences. Period. I can say that in 4 seconds. So what does he take 4 minutes for and how is it getting to the point?
@@recklessglitch I'm waiting on your 4 second video, where you explain a beginner what it is and show how to use it on premiere pro. Keep up the good work brother.
Finally! Someone who can explain not only WHAT these two things are, but can explain WHY you would use one vs. the other in different situations!!! Thank You!
thanks for making a video about this seemingly random topic, it's just what I needed
That’s great to hear! Thank you
Short, precise and well presented. Gold.
Thank you son much!
I stumbled onto your tutorial and... WOW! Soooo glad I clicked play! I appreciate the way you dive right in without wasting time. Your instructions are perfectly understandable and easy to follow. Thank you for creating this video - I look forward to watching many more.
Thank you ever so much! I really appreciate that.
THANK YOU SO MUCH! This is how a video should be! To the point and relevant to the issue presented. I hated nests because of the compression, they are good for somethings but can be very limiting too. I’m going to start making subsequences now for what I need. THANK YOU!!!
Very well explained thanks!
I was literally asking myself what the difference between these 2 sequences are... 2 minutes later, I typed out my query, saw your video on top of the search and clicked on it immediately haha! Thanks for the clear explanation.
New premiere pro user here, migrating from using only After Effects and nothing else to edit my videos... this saved my bacon. Thanks a ton.
Dude, super well done. Thank you!
Perfectly clear explanation. Just what I needed. Thank you!
brilliant explanation
great info thanks bruv
Very, very helpful! Thanks for the concise explanation.
You’re welcome! Thanks for your support
Super helpful. Thanks! Going to use this on my next video. 🔥
Loved your video.
thank you for the explanation! now understand 🔥
Amazing! Thank you for your support 🙌🏻🙌🏻
you're always the best. thx
Awesome dude. Thanks for the help.
fast and easy. Thanks !
Masterfully explained!
Absolutely incredible instructions. I gained more brain cells that I usually lose in 4m40s.
Thanks a lot, dude! :D
Brilliant. Thank you so much.
Thank you!
An Eye Opener Lesson😍👏 thanks chris all the way from the philippines 🇵🇭
Thank you so much! Your explanation is very clear and concise. It helps a lot for a beginner like me ☺️
liked and followed because you got to the point and didnt ask me to haha! Very helpful and direct video thank you!
Thank you, great explanation.
Awesome explaination!
Great video, great eyelashes. Thanks!
Haha, thank you very much!
Thanks!
you are the man.
thanks
So basically the subsequence creates a copy of the elements and throws them inside a new sequence. If this is so I'd rather have it called "Copy elements and create new sequence" because "subsequence" implies a hierarchy between the original sequence and the new sequence, but seemingly there is none.
Oh man, now I'm confused about Groups and Subsequences, and I'll have to take a better look at subsequences considering what you said about it. Nested Sequences are exactly what I was looking for though, Thank you
groups is just linking selected items locally on CURRENT timeline as opposed to subsequence being an independent item, groups are good for syncing segments in your timeline so when you drag a clip within a group, the entire group follows and doesn't break that sync, local segment control basically, while a subsequence can be something you use quite often and just copy paste it alot like show openers and closers and such, i don't know how to explain it further
subsequences are useful when you want the video to follow two different directions.
Example : you're making two RUclips videos, they have the same content, but one have graphics in English and the other in Spanish.
Just make the full video, and when you're adding graphics, make one subsequence to Spanish, and the main one will be in English.
Thanks for this lovely information
I've never used a sub-sequence, and now that I heard you describe it, I am not sure that I ever would. Nests, on the other hand, are a really useful tool that I use all the time - sort of a quick way to effectively get a (limited) version of an AE style "pre-comp" within Premiere. But it sounds like a Sub-Sequence is just a way to save a version of the timeline - and wouldn't it be more efficient and effective to just duplicate and version out the sequence. It's just hard to imagine a scenario where a sub-sequence would be a good option. Am I missing something?
I know this is an old comment but I'm going to respond in case anyone sees this now and is curious. I'm intermediate-ish in Premiere and just learning some advanced editing techniques. After watching this, subsequences are exactly what I was looking to do with a current project. I'm editing 3 hours of footage down to a "highlight reel". However, I'm doing a version for the client and then a fancier, more experimental cut for myself (as practice for other techniques that the client doesn't necessarily want or care about). The director's cut, you could say. I think saving my selects as a subsequence is a good option because I can then just come back to the subsequence quickly and edit from there. It feels faster/better to do it that way because it's just a right click away and isn't saving it as a separate project file. That's my thinking anyway.
@@killerqueendopamine So yeah, subsequence is literally just a copy...
@@killerqueendopamine Thanks for the comment, subsequences are actually exactly what I have been looking for. Sometimes, I want to play with my video edit, but don't want to screw up the original. So I end up with a bunch of separate projects all of the same set of clips edited differently. It seems like making a subsequence, will keep my work flow more tidy.
helpful!
This was helpful, thank you.
question totally answered, thank you
You’re welcome! Thanks for your support
Thanks
I'm a bit late to the party but solid video. Helped out a bunch.
Thank you!
Thank you for this wonderful tutorial ❤
Great video thank you
That was extremely useful. Thanks
Thank you so much!
nice! that very useful!!! ❕❕❕❕🔅
Thank you~~
nice video!
I'm wondering if this would help me if my sequence is bogged down and using too much RAM. I am already using proxy files. Actually I feel like the proxies made the project slower.
This is great!!! I have one additional question though....If I have added effects and edits to a video clip in a sequence that I would like to perhaps save for another use later on...is there a quick way (outside of exporting that out as a new video clip ) to simply save it as a new video right there inside of the project or is that really only done through an actual exporting of the sequence through the traditional export and render function? OR ..... is it possible to copy and paste a subsequenced clip from one project to another?
Thank you, this was very helpful. If you have one main sequence that contains several sub sequences and you make a change to one of the sub-sequences that alters the length, is there an easy way to update the main sequence?
That looks very helpful even though I won't use it but thank you for putting that much effort into it ❤❤ you literally deserve more subscribers
Does Nested Sequence Renders Faster Then Subsequence?
so to my knowledge a nested sequence wont lesson the quality....correct?
Correct
At 1.56 when you demonstrate the zoom, why does it look like the position is also key framed as it looks like the smaller clip is moving up screen as it zooms then suddenly changes direction. My premiere Pro has started doing this also and Adobe claim they don't know what I'm talking about.
Hey man, just wondering if you saw this comment? Just curious of this 'issue'
How do you create the same template for different images?
I tried to replace the different footages that were copied, but template 1 changed too :(
There's one more important thing about subsequences that bothers me. Usually i use the subsequence to separete teasers of my videos and edit it in a different timeline, but the subsequence starts in the original time of the first sequence. So, the new sequence doesn't start in 00:00:00:00. Is there any way to change it, and make the new sequence start at 00?
click on the sequence tab top right of the sequence in timeline. START TIME>type 0000000
Which app you use for screen recording ? Is it free ?😅
It’s free. I use QuickTime
Useless explanation of the subsequence. Does not clear its purpose. Especially once you get to know that if you change anything in the SUB sequence the changes won't reveal to that subsequence in the main sequence.
Thank you Chris!
You’re welcome! Thank you for your comment