I like your content but I'm taking this one (and most of your other CPU-related content) with a huge grain of salt. My 5950x/3090Strix rig can maintain 200+ fps easily while using competitive settings. I play in 3440x1440 on a PG35V monitor. The 10900k is a great CPU because of the product price and availability compared to its competition. It's not the King, nor is the 10900K an upgrade. I will also never recommend that anyone build a 5950X rig because of its price/gaming performance; you either want it or you need it. I've learned a great few things from your channel, but I feel like you omit information in your 10900K/5950X related uploads.
That building has killed my FPS everywhere in warzone apart from farmland and mili base like you said, use to get 200-230 1440p everywhere now I can barely pull 200 with my 5950x/3080😂
Great videos man. Have learned a ton from them. Can’t stop watching...Was the 5950x tuned to all core oc? Or pbo2? What were the final settings? Curious about the comparison, since you laid out the tuned 10900k.
@@youngtwang he wants you to buy a "consult" so he can charge you $250. but truth is you dont need it. just use *DRAM Calculator for Ryzen 1.7.3 by 1usmus* . If you dont know what memory chips you have you probably dont have b-die But you can check using *Thaiphoon Burner* just use the "read" button. Setting ram timings for ryzen will make a huge difference and with a little bit of time and effort even a novice can do this very easily with these tools. Take small steps and remember to save a bios profile incase you have to reset your CMOS (bios) back to defaults to get the pc to power on again.
So every 10900k can do 5200mhz on the cores, and 4800mhz on the ring? Does some know what the "average" voltage people use for that? I can't hit that without going over 1.4.
its not ONLY the cpu you have to think about here, you have different mobo's psu's and cooling. these can all effect your overclock. If you have done your research and have a good mobo,psu, then i would look into cooling(cooling is generally the biggest factor get those delta's down LOW). or even possibly your ambient room temp is just much higher than others. The other thing to remember is "stable" is a very relative term. Stable doing WHAT. every game puts a slightly different type of load on the cpu. so what might be stable for some games might crash every time in a different game.
But isn't the 10900k going to really suffer in 3 years by being on PCIE 3.0? I like to buy the best gaming CPU possible then upgrade the GPU 3-4 years later and keep using the system rather than replacing everything. Trying to decide between 10900k, 10850k, 5900x, and 5800x for CPU bound gaming and the occasional RUclips video/stream, GPU will be 3080 reference from Nvidia.
That's if pcie 3.0 cards are not the bottleneck lol pcie 4.0 hasn't shown any results at all vs 3.0 lol your comment is irrelevant just stick with the 10900k like I did
@@redclaw72666 No shit it's not about current cards, but rather the vastly superior ones coming as soon as 1 year with RDNA 3 that will likely get nerfed performance from PCIE 3.0. Hopper will almost certainly lose performance from 3.0
@@LordBattleSmurf I doubt it but okay lol you do you mate and source lmaooooo? Don't you dare say Moores law your looking at the future waaay too much to judge that but if it makes you feel better go with amd and upgrade with every amd platform lol its that simple but do you really think nvidia or amd will force everyone to use something better than pcie 3.0? Don't think soo bud lol
What ya think about the 5950X - 3090 and 4k VR? You think I'm giving up frame rates compared to the Intel? MSI x570 GL 5950X ClockTuner 4 Ryzen = P1 4500 - P2 4800 - PX 5ghz 32gb 3800mhz 3090ftw3 165/1100 Dual custom loop Predator 4k 120hz HP Reverb G2 Did I go with the wrong platform?
have you done any other benches on other games other than warzone comparing those 2 cpus? warzone is definitely weird for zen. if my son would have played more warzone i probably would have gone with the 10900k instead of the 5800x but i didnt come across your channel until after i built him the rig thinking that would be his best option. great content brother as usual
Imagine to have the best of the best rig on the market ,360hz monitor,10900k 5.5ghz,and a cheters with a patato pc 30fps max , comining to ruin your dreams! :D
I Genuinely like and respect what your doing here with your channel and like your video's. However not this one and here is why. At the start of this clip you show tha amd cpu is 4.32% faster entering the building, once into the building the amd system is 5.05% slower. One major issue with this clip the amd system was engaging in combat and all the extras from the person and the loot and the dmg icon as well as the boarder of the screen flashing. all of this vs the intel system doing a clean walk though. I i mean it just looks bad reguadless if the results are the same or not. This clip is a bad example and makes it look like a intel sponsored title or something. I genuinely think this is not the case and i know you need dat money but i feel this is a bad look. Best of luck not hating just explaining why i gave the thumbs down for THIS video (not others).
@@sagerdood OP made a legitimate point - the tests were not even which resulted in a flawed conclusion. The AMD machine had an engagement with another player, the Intel one did not. This DOES make a difference whether you like to admit it or not. Enough with the AMD bashing.
I have a 10850k and AMD Radeon RX 6700xt. How much can I overclock my PC? but so that nothing breaks or I have a system crash all the time. and can you maybe help me with that?
I have a 5900X and 3090. I have Bdie ram with 57ns in Aida after lowering trfc and tightening a few timings. I get 120-140 in that damn building when I get 190-240 FPS in GPU bound areas. This video was perfect timing.
@@xlinnaeus man warzone optimization is such shit it wont even make that much of a difference. i wish i had this system before raven took over and tanked performance.
@@joshjbeats huh i got min. 180fps in that building with my 5900x and 3080 with 57 ns ram and resolutionscaling to 121% U got some filters on or nvidia broadcast?
@@erosandolina4785 no i dont. i play on 1440p with everything on low and disabled except for high textures. i may have to try a clean install of windows or the game.
You should get more than 120-140, i have a 5900x and 3090 with 3800 ram at 56.5 ns and i get 190 in downtonw rarerly below 180, but overall in game it ranges from 175 to 225
Your wife's RiG is one of the highest tuned out there? I, As someone in the Firestrike HOF, it would be cool for you to do a benching video on that machine 😉👍
What are everyone's realistic fps averages lately? I always hear 300 but never see it. My 11900k water-blocked 3080, is in the range of 195-225 90% of the time. The other 10% either down to 190 or above to 235.
Also not overclocked. just standard z590 removing turbo limits and MCE. Also my buddy had a 5900x 6900xt liquid devil and his frames are nearly identical every time we check, maybe just 5 ahead at times (if he's being honest).
Why not show the specs of the comparative system - way too many variables to determine that the CPU is the culprit and as of now this issue doesn't arise but perhaps thats drivers
ROG STRIX 3090 OC (overclocked with MSI AB), i9-10900k (AI Overclock to 5Ghz), Asus Z-490E, 32 GB Dominator 3600 CL16 - I'm getting 170 FPS in 1080 low/ultra and 1440 low/ultra in Warzone, absolutely no FPS change when switching resolution or settings. Also, in multiplayer I'm getting 270 FPS. This doesn't make sense, and I've tried every optimization and setting trick on RUclips and reddit. Please help me understand why I can't break 200 FPS with this 3090.
I have a i7 4770k with a 1080ti, thinking of getting a 10850k with 3600mhz ram... i got a arctic freezer 2 240mm aio. Can anyone reccomend what a good cpu upgrade is if im off the wall with the 10850k
Gots a question. i recently became the proud owner of a 10900K 3090 FTW3 rig... what's a good cpu overclock to run daily? & should i overclock my gpu as well ?
im torn between amd and intel for my itx 2nd pc build.. 3080ti either 10850k or 5900x... theres a difference of 440 bucks amd more of course.. opinions?
What type of people bro in i9 11900k also same 178fps avg sometimes and comparing to Ryzen 9 wtf never compare to monster i9 is still child dragon its to far to touch
An average 10900k has a SP rating of 63. These will hardly get 5.2ghz all core. You just got lucky and received a golden bin and 2 above average chips. Also your memory latency will not be easy to achieve for other people seeing as most will have a penalty of 2-4 due to memory traces. Ram also is only b die which can achieve this frequency and timings and I suspect not even all bdie kits will run 4000 c17. This all to say that this setup is anything but average and to achieve these results they need the best hardware(Mobo,Cpu,Ram,Psu) and some binning luck even. This isn't Max 5950x vs average 10900k more like very good 10900k setup.
@@sagerdood And this isn't even the complete story seeing as I have bought 8 samples and the best out of the bunch was SP 83 and all others were lower. This SP83 chip can run warzone at 5.3Ghz but needs 1.44V LLC6. So I run it at 5.2 with 1.38V LLC6 but almost prime 95 max stable except one core. I have now ordered an z590 apex to see if with the improved load transient delta control I can decrease voltage and improve stability. Also the apex memory traces should give me a reduction of 3-4 on latency and improved stability for higher frequency. I have a 4800c17 bdie kit incoming together with the apex board to see if the higher frequecy tighter timing of the 2x8 can outperform my 4300c17 2x16kit.
@@sagerdood Only the z590 apex and maximus extreme have the feature to give a readout of the min and max voltage during transient. They also have the best power delivery and power plane of all the asus boards. The hero is more focused on extra features besides pure performance while the apex is equal or better than the extreme when it comes to max performance benefits.
@@sagerdood Buildzoid also made a video of some z590 boards which show the actual vcore voltage with the current buos setting for vcore and the llc. On the asus boards he reviewed the llc4 was the best in keeping the delta low in transient but llc5 and llc 6 were still acceptable and have less vdroop. anything above llc6 shouldnt be used. My z490 strix e seems to be giving far less voltage than the msi or gigabyte boards do with the same settings I suspect the lower tier boards performance wise(probably hero is in this category) have bad vdroop and transient response in comparison with msi and gigabyte.
@@sagerdood 2 vs 4 ram slots is a huge penalty for ram latency and signal integrity. Also Apex has much better Power delivery and also plane due to the fact is isnt using pins for iGpu voltage. Like I said before the hero is feature based premium. The apex is ultimate performance premium as I suspect the apex board also outperforms the extreme. I highly doubt the hero can compete with the apex when it comes to max memory and cpu performance.
You might be held back due to your mobo memory trace layout. My current board also has a penalty of 4ns in comparison with an itx or apex board. the 2 instead of 4 ram slots increase signal integrity and reduce the distance of the trace path. the best I can achieve with daily voltage dram 1.45v vccio 1.25 vccsa 1.30 is 4300 17-17-17 with very tight secondary and tertiary timings. is read 64666 write 66704 copy 62500 latency 39.7 Cpu 5.2Ghz and ring at 4.9 Ghz.
2x16GB 4100 16-16-16-34, I also hit a wall of 41ns. Gigabyte Z490 Aorus Elite AC. My guess is some motherboards just have a limitation in how low you can go. Back when I was tuning timings on my X99 platform, my latency kept dropping even while doing the very last subtimings. On this one I started at 47ns with XMP and quickly dropped to 44ns, then gradually to 41ns, but never below it.
Proves intel is the more reliable brand. For all AMD great marketing, it's just not with intel. Only got to look at my 3900x, when this game first came out i was getting 180+ fps now im averaging 120-130fps paired with a 2080ti.
Dude I'm really tired of seeing shitty Warzone stuff all the time in my news feed, I don't care if you get 100 or 3k FPS, other stuff on your Chanel was interesting, but last few months a lame as hell.
@@BorealSine I haven’t ran any stability testing like that if it hasn’t crashed on normal day to day use and if it doesn’t I consider it stable to me anyway
put the aida 64 of the 5950x next to the 10900k please
This right here! Using shit games compiled with Intel's compiler and then being like omg my last gen cpu without pcie4 runs awesome is priceless.
@@ThePazuzu What does PCIE gen 4 change?
I like your content but I'm taking this one (and most of your other CPU-related content) with a huge grain of salt. My 5950x/3090Strix rig can maintain 200+ fps easily while using competitive settings. I play in 3440x1440 on a PG35V monitor. The 10900k is a great CPU because of the product price and availability compared to its competition. It's not the King, nor is the 10900K an upgrade. I will also never recommend that anyone build a 5950X rig because of its price/gaming performance; you either want it or you need it. I've learned a great few things from your channel, but I feel like you omit information in your 10900K/5950X related uploads.
What ram specs you running at ?
@@yov023 I don't mind sharing my specs, but this isn't my channel, and I'm not known here.
@@sagerdood I'm happy with my system. I was fortunate enough to be in a position to buy the best hardware available and build a banger of a PC =)
That building has killed my FPS everywhere in warzone apart from farmland and mili base like you said, use to get 200-230 1440p everywhere now I can barely pull 200 with my 5950x/3080😂
Great videos man. Have learned a ton from them. Can’t stop watching...Was the 5950x tuned to all core oc? Or pbo2? What were the final settings? Curious about the comparison, since you laid out the tuned 10900k.
I’ve watched them all. Didn’t see the final settings. Could you let me know the name of the video you saw it in?
@@youngtwang he wants you to buy a "consult" so he can charge you $250. but truth is you dont need it. just use *DRAM Calculator for Ryzen 1.7.3 by 1usmus* .
If you dont know what memory chips you have you probably dont have b-die But you can check using *Thaiphoon Burner* just use the "read" button.
Setting ram timings for ryzen will make a huge difference and with a little bit of time and effort even a novice can do this very easily with these tools. Take small steps and remember to save a bios profile incase you have to reset your CMOS (bios) back to defaults to get the pc to power on again.
@@sagerdood LOL wut. no one was talking about better or worse than anything.. What are you on about?
@@sagerdood Actually Intel latency is horrible with 10-core loads. Way worse than 5950x with 16. Read up.
So every 10900k can do 5200mhz on the cores, and 4800mhz on the ring? Does some know what the "average" voltage people use for that? I can't hit that without going over 1.4.
That is strange... Even my 10850k can do 5.2ghz 1.35v.
try with ht off
its not ONLY the cpu you have to think about here, you have different mobo's psu's and cooling. these can all effect your overclock. If you have done your research and have a good mobo,psu, then i would look into cooling(cooling is generally the biggest factor get those delta's down LOW). or even possibly your ambient room temp is just much higher than others. The other thing to remember is "stable" is a very relative term. Stable doing WHAT. every game puts a slightly different type of load on the cpu. so what might be stable for some games might crash every time in a different game.
Yeah, it's simply not true.
But isn't the 10900k going to really suffer in 3 years by being on PCIE 3.0? I like to buy the best gaming CPU possible then upgrade the GPU 3-4 years later and keep using the system rather than replacing everything. Trying to decide between 10900k, 10850k, 5900x, and 5800x for CPU bound gaming and the occasional RUclips video/stream, GPU will be 3080 reference from Nvidia.
That's if pcie 3.0 cards are not the bottleneck lol pcie 4.0 hasn't shown any results at all vs 3.0 lol your comment is irrelevant just stick with the 10900k like I did
@@redclaw72666 No shit it's not about current cards, but rather the vastly superior ones coming as soon as 1 year with RDNA 3 that will likely get nerfed performance from PCIE 3.0. Hopper will almost certainly lose performance from 3.0
@@LordBattleSmurf I doubt it but okay lol you do you mate and source lmaooooo? Don't you dare say Moores law your looking at the future waaay too much to judge that but if it makes you feel better go with amd and upgrade with every amd platform lol its that simple but do you really think nvidia or amd will force everyone to use something better than pcie 3.0? Don't think soo bud lol
@@redclaw72666 facts
How about minimums like 1% and 0,1% fps? How hard they will be hit on 5950x?
Pretty bad lol they don't do well
Perfect video as usual
What ya think about the 5950X - 3090 and 4k VR? You think I'm giving up frame rates compared to the Intel?
MSI x570 GL 5950X ClockTuner 4 Ryzen = P1 4500 - P2 4800 - PX 5ghz
32gb 3800mhz
3090ftw3 165/1100
Dual custom loop
Predator 4k 120hz
HP Reverb G2
Did I go with the wrong platform?
My 5900x with 6900xt has 240fps down town with ease
Yeah would love to see this. If so then I only need to sell my cpu and not my mobo. Otherwise I'll prob be buying an i9
Good troll lol
have you done any other benches on other games other than warzone comparing those 2 cpus? warzone is definitely weird for zen. if my son would have played more warzone i probably would have gone with the 10900k instead of the 5800x but i didnt come across your channel until after i built him the rig thinking that would be his best option. great content brother as usual
Yep long time ago when the 5950X launched, you have the 5950X winning in valorant, CSgo, and division 2. 10900k wins everything else
@@FrameChasers copy that ghost rider...amd buyers remorse but i dont think my kid will notice
I really wanna make the switch just hate having to switch everything out
No this is definitely a downgrade and will see diminishing returns on future titles that take advantage of more cores.
Imagine to have the best of the best rig on the market ,360hz monitor,10900k 5.5ghz,and a cheters with a patato pc 30fps max , comining to ruin your dreams! :D
im getting 185 to 195 in that building on my 5950x with a 3080 and 32 gigs ram playing on 1440
I Genuinely like and respect what your doing here with your channel and like your video's. However not this one and here is why. At the start of this clip you show tha amd cpu is 4.32% faster entering the building, once into the building the amd system is 5.05% slower. One major issue with this clip the amd system was engaging in combat and all the extras from the person and the loot and the dmg icon as well as the boarder of the screen flashing. all of this vs the intel system doing a clean walk though. I i mean it just looks bad reguadless if the results are the same or not. This clip is a bad example and makes it look like a intel sponsored title or something. I genuinely think this is not the case and i know you need dat money but i feel this is a bad look. Best of luck not hating just explaining why i gave the thumbs down for THIS video (not others).
I just provide data and findings, up to you if you want to believe it, doesn’t matter to me. I’m here for max FPS, nothing else
@@FrameChasers - Doesn't matter to you if your viewers like your content or not? Wow 🤣🤦♂️
@@sagerdood OP made a legitimate point - the tests were not even which resulted in a flawed conclusion. The AMD machine had an engagement with another player, the Intel one did not. This DOES make a difference whether you like to admit it or not. Enough with the AMD bashing.
Love the content bro. Surprised how your channel hasn’t blown up yet
How many cores does warzone use actually?
Man you couldn't pay me to make that 'upgrade'
I have a 10850k and AMD Radeon RX 6700xt. How much can I overclock my PC? but so that nothing breaks or I have a system crash all the time. and can you maybe help me with that?
I have a 5900X and 3090. I have Bdie ram with 57ns in Aida after lowering trfc and tightening a few timings. I get 120-140 in that damn building when I get 190-240 FPS in GPU bound areas. This video was perfect timing.
Lmaooo bruh. I’ll swap you my 3700x Hynix C/DJR 3733 cl16 kit 😂
@@xlinnaeus man warzone optimization is such shit it wont even make that much of a difference. i wish i had this system before raven took over and tanked performance.
@@joshjbeats huh i got min. 180fps in that building with my 5900x and 3080 with 57 ns ram and resolutionscaling to 121%
U got some filters on or nvidia broadcast?
@@erosandolina4785 no i dont. i play on 1440p with everything on low and disabled except for high textures. i may have to try a clean install of windows or the game.
You should get more than 120-140, i have a 5900x and 3090 with 3800 ram at 56.5 ns and i get 190 in downtonw rarerly below 180, but overall in game it ranges from 175 to 225
Your wife's RiG is one of the highest tuned out there? I, As someone in the Firestrike HOF, it would be cool for you to do a benching video on that machine 😉👍
Yes - I am a 5950x user.
What are everyone's realistic fps averages lately? I always hear 300 but never see it. My 11900k water-blocked 3080, is in the range of 195-225 90% of the time. The other 10% either down to 190 or above to 235.
Also not overclocked. just standard z590 removing turbo limits and MCE. Also my buddy had a 5900x 6900xt liquid devil and his frames are nearly identical every time we check, maybe just 5 ahead at times (if he's being honest).
What res?
@@Rhomzy 1080 pretty low settings
Why not show the specs of the comparative system - way too many variables to determine that the CPU is the culprit and as of now this issue doesn't arise but perhaps thats drivers
ROG STRIX 3090 OC (overclocked with MSI AB), i9-10900k (AI Overclock to 5Ghz), Asus Z-490E, 32 GB Dominator 3600 CL16 - I'm getting 170 FPS in 1080 low/ultra and 1440 low/ultra in Warzone, absolutely no FPS change when switching resolution or settings. Also, in multiplayer I'm getting 270 FPS. This doesn't make sense, and I've tried every optimization and setting trick on RUclips and reddit. Please help me understand why I can't break 200 FPS with this 3090.
rams
I have a i7 4770k with a 1080ti, thinking of getting a 10850k with 3600mhz ram... i got a arctic freezer 2 240mm aio.
Can anyone reccomend what a good cpu upgrade is if im off the wall with the 10850k
I upgraded to tht from a 8700 was well worth u need at least a 9900k lvl cpu for this game
“ Be like water my friend “ loving the content - look forward to sats stream man👍🏻
Gots a question. i recently became the proud owner of a 10900K 3090 FTW3 rig... what's a good cpu overclock to run daily? & should i overclock my gpu as well ?
Why even bother? Are you running in 480p @ 1000fps on some 1000hz monitor nobody's ever heard of? Lol
im torn between amd and intel for my itx 2nd pc build.. 3080ti either 10850k or 5900x... theres a difference of 440 bucks amd more of course.. opinions?
10850k games better when coupled with better ram
@@FrameChasers well what ram should I go with then for it? Need atleast 32gb.. I'm building itx 2nd pc build in corsair 250d with 3080 ti fe
"The title is NOT a typo" bro AND you were too easy on the 10900k overclock like theres nothing more to say
I saw more like 195 vs 185. One game. Only one game. Doesn't matter to anyone even competitive gamers.
How did you fix the Z590 unify? I have it and it keeps black screen rebooting on any kind of reasonably tuned RAM - it's driving me insane!
update bios, pull the ram OC back step by step until you find the OC your chipset couldn't handle.
What type of people bro in i9 11900k also same 178fps avg sometimes and comparing to Ryzen 9 wtf never compare to monster i9 is still child dragon its to far to touch
time for Ryzen people to upgrade to a 6950X
(kek)
Intel fanboy level
Hey framechasers I'm trying to lower my ram latency on zen 3 I'm sitting high 50s ns. How low have you seen it go on zen 3?
54ns lol
@@redclaw72666 I hit 57 and though I could go low 50s but it seems almost impossible
An average 10900k has a SP rating of 63. These will hardly get 5.2ghz all core. You just got lucky and received a golden bin and 2 above average chips. Also your memory latency will not be easy to achieve for other people seeing as most will have a penalty of 2-4 due to memory traces. Ram also is only b die which can achieve this frequency and timings and I suspect not even all bdie kits will run 4000 c17. This all to say that this setup is anything but average and to achieve these results they need the best hardware(Mobo,Cpu,Ram,Psu) and some binning luck even. This isn't Max 5950x vs average 10900k more like very good 10900k setup.
@@sagerdood And this isn't even the complete story seeing as I have bought 8 samples and the best out of the bunch was SP 83 and all others were lower. This SP83 chip can run warzone at 5.3Ghz but needs 1.44V LLC6. So I run it at 5.2 with 1.38V LLC6 but almost prime 95 max stable except one core. I have now ordered an z590 apex to see if with the improved load transient delta control I can decrease voltage and improve stability. Also the apex memory traces should give me a reduction of 3-4 on latency and improved stability for higher frequency. I have a 4800c17 bdie kit incoming together with the apex board to see if the higher frequecy tighter timing of the 2x8 can outperform my 4300c17 2x16kit.
Keep us posted
@@sagerdood Only the z590 apex and maximus extreme have the feature to give a readout of the min and max voltage during transient. They also have the best power delivery and power plane of all the asus boards. The hero is more focused on extra features besides pure performance while the apex is equal or better than the extreme when it comes to max performance benefits.
@@sagerdood Buildzoid also made a video of some z590 boards which show the actual vcore voltage with the current buos setting for vcore and the llc. On the asus boards he reviewed the llc4 was the best in keeping the delta low in transient but llc5 and llc 6 were still acceptable and have less vdroop. anything above llc6 shouldnt be used. My z490 strix e seems to be giving far less voltage than the msi or gigabyte boards do with the same settings I suspect the lower tier boards performance wise(probably hero is in this category) have bad vdroop and transient response in comparison with msi and gigabyte.
@@sagerdood 2 vs 4 ram slots is a huge penalty for ram latency and signal integrity. Also Apex has much better Power delivery and also plane due to the fact is isnt using pins for iGpu voltage. Like I said before the hero is feature based premium. The apex is ultimate performance premium as I suspect the apex board also outperforms the extreme. I highly doubt the hero can compete with the apex when it comes to max memory and cpu performance.
INTERESTING
i would just cap the game with rtss..144 should be real good
Man I am using 4000mhz 16-16-16-32 two sticks and I can’t get it below 41ns. Do a vid on memory tuning maybe? Please 😭
You might be held back due to your mobo memory trace layout. My current board also has a penalty of 4ns in comparison with an itx or apex board. the 2 instead of 4 ram slots increase signal integrity and reduce the distance of the trace path. the best I can achieve with daily voltage dram 1.45v vccio 1.25 vccsa 1.30 is 4300 17-17-17 with very tight secondary and tertiary timings. is read 64666 write 66704 copy 62500 latency 39.7 Cpu 5.2Ghz and ring at 4.9 Ghz.
2x16GB 4100 16-16-16-34, I also hit a wall of 41ns.
Gigabyte Z490 Aorus Elite AC.
My guess is some motherboards just have a limitation in how low you can go.
Back when I was tuning timings on my X99 platform, my latency kept dropping even while doing the very last subtimings. On this one I started at 47ns with XMP and quickly dropped to 44ns, then gradually to 41ns, but never below it.
@@bombba5359 does cpu clock affect latency?
@@ShafGG I'm not 100% on that but think if you increase your ring clock you will have better latency.
@@ShafGG at what frequency is it running now
Oh yeahhh
What about 11900K ? 🤔
Terrible in everything
Oh? Thank you.I just canceled my order for ibuy power pc with 11900k.
Good video.That screen tearing...
dammn
Nope wrong bro I had one
Proves intel is the more reliable brand. For all AMD great marketing, it's just not with intel. Only got to look at my 3900x, when this game first came out i was getting 180+ fps now im averaging 120-130fps paired with a 2080ti.
LOL
What if’s lmao 😂
💪
Dude I'm really tired of seeing shitty Warzone stuff all the time in my news feed, I don't care if you get 100 or 3k FPS, other stuff on your Chanel was interesting, but last few months a lame as hell.
Nothing I can do about it, hardware videos get 1/4 the clicks as warzone ones. No one cares about hardware anymore
That's cute. I don't play Warzone though.
👍
This makes me feel special that my 10900k with 92 sp can hit 5.3 ghz and 50 ring.
@@sagerdood 1.32
@@BorealSine I haven’t ran any stability testing like that if it hasn’t crashed on normal day to day use and if it doesn’t I consider it stable to me anyway
@@BorealSine whoa settle down there sparky. I’m not running avx-0, never said I was -2 I believe on avx.
My 9900k and my 10900k outperforms my 3950x very ez. In gaming . Sorry AMD
And my 9900k was at 4.9ghz
Warzone is one of the bad coding game i see in my entire gaming life(30 years gaming)