HERE I GO FROGGING AGAIN! Glarb Control- Modern MTG

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 дек 2024

Комментарии • 34

  • @briandixon9140
    @briandixon9140 7 дней назад +19

    Frog Power! (When it isn't Psychic Frog)

  • @Kristjan0209
    @Kristjan0209 3 дня назад +24

    game 1 you forgot mite is noncreature

  • @Tambanti
    @Tambanti 3 дня назад +16

    "This is not enjoyable" tag line for the current state of modern

    • @Insharai
      @Insharai День назад

      aint that the statement of the century... good lord I legit didn't realize this wasn't legacy as I skipped the deck tech xD

  • @SorcerySpeedConcede
    @SorcerySpeedConcede 3 дня назад +13

    Round 1 I would have considered endurance to get rid of the pesky removal creatures after they got used up.

  • @GGun1t
    @GGun1t 2 дня назад +2

    I wanna see Glarb in legacy post frog ban

  • @nuparuchi
    @nuparuchi 3 дня назад +4

    I feel like this deck is greatly improved by the one ring getting banned (and probably something from energy) since as is, being a durdley deck doesnt really beat anything in the metagame. Energy is insanely efficient and the combo decks that fight it are faster than you

  • @veggiesblowup8785
    @veggiesblowup8785 2 дня назад +1

    At the end of round 4, you could have used Valakut to kill Gaddock Teeg- Overlord attack makes an Everywhere token, which is your last mountain to turn the Valakut on. In fact, I'm pretty sure you should have had Valakut on earlier that game, and just weren't thinking about it / playing towards it.

  • @MrLogistician
    @MrLogistician 3 дня назад +3

    Really cool deck, thanks for sharing Phil. Im not a professional but i really think you should take out glarb instead of the leyline.
    1. Leyline combos hard with Scion. Leyline + scion forces opponents to deal with the leyline enchantment because leyline gives scion hexproof. Even if they static prison, they have to pick leyline before they can pick scion.
    2. Leyline fixes mana
    3. Glarb is the only card that needs black mana(im pretty sure anyway). So boarding out glarb might have also let you board out the 2 tapland triomes and go up on removal
    I do feel like a bit of an ass because glarb is cool and opponents LOVED to target it for removal but i just think scion + leyline beats glarb + scion
    Edit to add: ok i saw your wrap up at the end. Sorry i usually skip that. Anyway i agree with your comments about the mana base and i dont mean to sound so harsh about how you sideboarded. I think Dryad of the Ilysian Grove could have a home in this deck with or without the ring. Without the ring glard becomes a lot more important for card advantage/card selection, although thats a problem for many modern decks.

  • @Qbr12
    @Qbr12 3 дня назад +5

    In round 1, that haywire mite only hits noncreature artifacts and enchantments. So overlords that are not impending aren't legal targets, nor are Scions of Draco.

  • @TROLOLOLOLO007
    @TROLOLOLOLO007 3 дня назад +4

    Back to back games with your plan being ruined by Thraben charm is ironic...

  • @tylermfdurden
    @tylermfdurden 3 дня назад +3

    I really miss the good old days of Modern before they started rotating the format

  • @luxaeturna1892
    @luxaeturna1892 4 дня назад +5

    Is there anything to legacy glarb beans? Cast force of will of the top+draw a card=profit?

  • @oscar15suarez
    @oscar15suarez 3 дня назад +2

    Maybe 1 Palantir could be a fun addition to this deck since the mana values are that high

  • @vitaly2422
    @vitaly2422 3 дня назад +5

    That round one deck is sooooo anti on-ring lol
    Haywire mite in multiples with multiple angles of recursion, plus consigns!

    • @data_abort
      @data_abort 3 дня назад +3

      Yeah I don't play modern much atm, but you can see from the video how much the format is warped around Ring exiling.

    • @ThrabenUniversity
      @ThrabenUniversity  2 дня назад +1

      I got so wrecked. XD

    • @chiknsmack
      @chiknsmack 2 дня назад

      I've been out of the loop on Modern for a while so, while I knew about Martyr Proc splashing green for Haywire Mite and sometimes blue for Supreme Verdict, the Fungi and Consigns were a surprise.

  • @epsilon8597
    @epsilon8597 3 дня назад +1

    GG for the decks !

  • @skirk248
    @skirk248 3 дня назад +1

    Phil's cries of pain bring me joy

  • @RiKSh4w
    @RiKSh4w 3 дня назад +1

    Prismatic Ending is the only card which disqualifies the deck from having Keruga, The Macrosage as a companion. That's not an insignificant cut but it could be interesting if Pending's replacement is okay.

  • @tribus6220
    @tribus6220 3 дня назад +6

    How did we manage to forget keruga in this deck? Pending is literally the only sub 3

    • @Luciferian.Latino
      @Luciferian.Latino 3 дня назад +1

      Pending is not a permanent. This deck is Keruga Compliant™ already.

    • @foxokon94
      @foxokon94 3 дня назад +2

      Sadly, Keruga had a readonable wording, so the x spells make it not compatible

    • @Luciferian.Latino
      @Luciferian.Latino 3 дня назад +2

      Ahh shit, it's not permanents - it's all cards.
      Keruga Compliance denied. Wrath of the Skies and Pending both invalidate.

  • @dustinfurness2155
    @dustinfurness2155 3 дня назад

    I’m pretty sure 2 instances of The One Ring ETB trigger is just 2 instances of protection from everything in the same turn. The second instance of that is redundant and possibly even fizzles upon resolving unless you can be targeted twice simultaneously. If they trigger sequentially in the same turn then you already have protection from everything with the first and can’t be targeted by the second.

  • @Eisenwulf666
    @Eisenwulf666 3 дня назад

    Everyday i'm Glarbin',Glarbin', Glarbin' ...Party frog is in the house tonight!

  • @IeuroI
    @IeuroI 3 дня назад +3

    oof, modern seems miserable atm

  • @Zauzzie
    @Zauzzie 2 дня назад

    I dont keep up much with modern, does every deck play 4 copies of The One Ring? that seems healthy..

  • @darienmckenzie7729
    @darienmckenzie7729 3 дня назад +1

    Round 3 not replacing one ring effect whn you had way better board presence was bit greedy pro everything would helped maybe just a thought

  • @GlichCentral
    @GlichCentral 3 дня назад

    We unfortunately got stomped a little, but at least the opponents in games 1 and 4 were cool.

  • @considerthehumbleworm
    @considerthehumbleworm 3 дня назад

    Poor guy's named GLARB :(

  • @JacoDeltaco
    @JacoDeltaco 3 дня назад +1

    one ring should be limit to one in the deck (I am not sure it a good idea but I like the flavour) or ban