@@bobchoate4403 well I mean the North Carolina was there first before the South Dakota took over with Washington following after when South Dakota went back for repairs and then escorted convoys with Alabama before going to the pacific before Guadalcanal where she took part in escort duties with the Massachusetts being in the Atlantic for operation torch fighting the Vichy battleship Jean Bart which was deployed before completion to halt the landings with Iowa being the last American battleship to be stationed in the Atlantic to deter the Tirpitz the battleships Indiana, Missouri, Wisconsin and finally the one you mentioned New Jersey were never stationed in the Atlantic
I know it's pRoBaBlY going to be one-sided, but I still really want to see this: The Battle of the Sisters: Fusō & Yamashiro vs Nelson & Rodney /// 2v2 It's late 1941, the British Admiralty has agreed to send the HMS Nelson and HMS Rodney to the far-east to reinforce their presence instead of sending HMS Repulse and HMS Prince of Wales--the thought being that the two sister ships should compliment each other well with regards to performance and firepower. The Japanese are waiting and have set a trap--while the main strike force sent to Hawaii is commencing the raid on Pearl Harbor, the Fusō and Yamashiro have been dispatched to the Indian Ocean to blockade any reinforcements being sent via the Suez Canal. The pairs of ships both have the same maximum speed of 23 knots while their armament could also be considered a draw. It's a battle of sisters as the aging dreadnought style ships hold their ground against the advancing British treaty-built battleships. Fusō-class battleship Displacement 35,900 long tons (36,500 t) (full load) Length 202.7 m (665 ft) (overall) Beam 28.7 m (94 ft 2 in) Installed power 24 × Miyahara water-tube boilers 40,000 shp (30,000 kW) Propulsion 4 × shafts; 2 × steam turbine sets Speed 23 knots (43 km/h; 26 mph) Range 8,000 nmi (15,000 km; 9,200 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph) Complement 1,198 Armament 6 × twin 356 mm (14 in) guns 16 × single 152 mm (6 in) guns 6 × 533 mm (21 in) torpedo tubes Armor Waterline belt 229-305 mm (9-12 in) Deck: 32-51 mm (1.3-2.0 in) Gun turrets: 229-279 mm (9-11 in) Barbettes: 203-305 mm (8-12 in) Conning tower: 351 mm (13.8 in) Nelson-class battleship Displacement 37,780 long tons (38,390 t) (full load) Length 709 ft 10 in (216.4 m) o/a Beam 106 ft (32.3 m) Installed power 8 × Admiralty 3-drum boilers 45,000 shp (34,000 kW) Propulsion 2 shafts; 2 geared steam turbines Speed 23 knots (43 km/h; 26 mph) Range 7,000 nmi (13,000 km; 8,100 mi) at 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph) Complement 1,361 (flagship) Armament 3 × triple 16 in (406 mm) guns 6 × twin 6 in (152 mm) guns 6 × single 4.7 in (120 mm) AA guns 8 × single 2 pdr (40 mm (1.6 in)) AA guns 2 × 24.5 in (622 mm) torpedo tubes Armour Waterline belt: 13-14 in (330-356 mm) Deck: 3.75-6.25 in (95-159 mm) Barbettes: 12-15 in (305-381 mm) Gun turrets: 9-16 in (229-406 mm) Conning tower: 12-14 in (305-356 mm) Bulkheads: 4-12 in (102-305 mm)
Though wouldn't Vanguard be a better pick for the other Royal Navy ship, with slightly different build priorities the Vanguard would have been ready in time so not unrealistic.
There were 5 Yamato class ships, One converted to an aircraft carrier, Two actually laid down, Two more no named, but one laid down, the other just planned
Yea, the aircraft carrier was named Shinano and is considered to be one of the first super carriers in history. Too bad it never saw any action as it was sunk by US submarine Archerfish just days after finishing sea trials.
@@evanlong6119 would it actually be beneficial if Shinano were to actually come into service? The Navy was pretty much decimated one way or another so even if they were able to get her online what could she do? Just curious
@@memeologist21 Not really, by late 1944 (which was when the carrier was launched and sunk) the veteran pilots of the Japanese navy were mostly gone. What pilots remained were undertrained rookies who had been rushed to the front to try and stop the allies who were rapidly advancing on japan. The Shinano would have likely been sunk by US aircraft at some point or would have had little impact on the war itself.
Note: The German main and secondary towers have significant base accuracy and accuracy modifiers compared to other towers. Tower modifiers are a factor for me in design, such as the Japanese towers being exceptional for spotting and long range gunnery since they are so tall.
Turret Names on German BBs are: Main Turret 1: Anton Main Turret 2: Bruno Main Turret 3: Caesar Main Turret 4: Dora Also my suggestion is: 1 Design A150 vs 1 H44 A Couple Other Suggestions: Number 13 Class Battleship vs South Dakota Class (1920 Cancelled Class of ships not the 1939 Design of the same name) Tosa-Class Battleship vs Pennsylvania Class (Post Refit - Arizona) USS Texas vs Amagi Class Battlecruiser
@@halfgecko3202 The Bismarck's turrets were only four in number and turrets were named in line with the turret configuration AB-CD. Hood had a similar naming scheme except it wasn't the turrets themselves, it was the guns which were in this case named after characters in Snow White and the seven dwarfs. In essence, historically, no turrets had actual names to them; however some famous ships had their turrets or individual guns named as "batteries" similar to how they were named for coastal fortifications such as the Atlantic Wall as one example.
Tsesarevich vs Mikasa Both ship fought and trade blows in battle of the yellow sea in 1904. You could argue that this fight is just France vs England since both ship were built by foreign nations. Tsesarevich was based on French battleship Jauréguiberry and built at the Forges et Chantiers de la Méditerranée shipyard in La Seyne-sur-Mer, France , while Mikasa was based on the Formidable-class battleships of the Royal Navy with two additional 6-inch and built by Vickers at their Barrow-in-Furness shipyard, Cumbria, North-West England.
Indeed. I always remembered that part of an old book I had when I was younger (it was about the Bismark, specifically going back and forth between accounts from some of the sailors, and the guys who were operating the Alvin submersible and its support ship to find and explore its wreck).
@@Cat-y4w Well, its possible that it was at least intended to be able to take on the Bismarck evenly, but that it was indeed also meant to keep up with carriers. Perhaps it was first being designed one way, but then had its design altered a bit. Or perhaps Tyler's comment is indeed just hearsay that wasn't actually the case.
It was meant for escorting carriers, and being a counter to the supposed 50,000 ton Yamato... But it would be a counter to Bismarck too, just not intended historically
US foreign policy was more concerned with Japan and protecting US interests in the Pacific than whatever squabbles went on in continental Europe. The American government used the excuses that the Kongo class was a violation of the washington naval treaty and the fact Japan back out of the London naval treaty to invoke the escalator clause of the London Naval treaty for the Iowa Class.
The Battleship New Jersey was used in case the Tirpitz broke out into the atlantic. During it's uneventful tour of the North Atlantic they needed a closed weather deck due to it being far colder than designed as the Iowas were designed to escort fast carriers in the warmer Pacific. There's a far more informative video on the battleship New Jersey channel.
Going bow in with Yamato class allows for a far smaller target whilst still keeping 2/3rds of the firepower. A more aggressive design as opposed to all round firepower of a AB XY design.
I will repeat my gaggle of battle requests, bar River Plate since that apparently can't be done properly. Tegethoff vs Gangut; battle of the triple turret WWI dreadnoughts Admiral Hipper vs Berwick (probably unfair fight) Nachi vs Salt Lake City Alaska vs B-65 (might be a bit hard to create)
Yamato just wanted to help course correct her sister ship as her rudder was damaged. :) About patches/delays to the games development, i purchased it on steam as soon as it came available and don´t regret it since. The way the game is right now it already provided me hours of building and skirmishing around with various scenarios. Sure patches are welcome with fixes and new stuff but to a certain extend i wonder how long the devs can keep this up without selling more content with dlc´s to make some bucks. Either way, its a great game as is and it is probably only getting better over time either way.
Since this game seems well designed for it and for a change of pace from Dreadnought era ships I want to see the veteran of the Spanish-American and First World War protected cruiser USS Olympia go up against Russo-Japanese war and survivor of the battle of Tsushima the Russian protected cruiser Aurora. Winner faces pre-dreadnought Mikasa.
I think making these battles not strict 1v1 but different numbers will help balance them out and make them more interesting. This was my favourite one so far.
If I remember corretly, the german's doctrin was made for cqc as the weather and sea in the nothern Atlantic was very poor, so long range duals were "not planed for"
The damage instability debuff gets lower as the time goes on, so a massive hit and reduction in structural integrity causes a really big and sudden drop in accuracy, that will be regained over time. Whereas if the damage coming in is gradual it is counteracted by the repairs over a longer time producing a longer lasting but lower drop in accuracy overall.
I'm surprised that the light shells were doing so much. Btw I am working on a custom campaign for from the depths that is heavily inspired by this game.
In custom battle, they don't go away after battle. They just stay in the custom battle file. This can lead to you fighting your own ships if you fight a nation at a year you have made ships for, but don't specify what ships they are using. You cannot currently save/export/import a ship design, unless you goto the custom battle save file and just manually use wordpad or something to extract the ship from it and give it to someone who knows how to insert it into their own file. Someone should really make an open source program that does that for you so that people can trade ships around until the devs actually consider putting in an import/export feature themselves.
I would say the A-150 was probably the most realistic design for 20 inch gun with 6 20 inch guns. Getting 8 on a ship is sacrificing to much of other things. 9 18 inch 50's I would say is the max without haven't to sacrifice speed and armour
Speaking of Armor Quality; And I hope you read this here Stealth. If the Yamato in game (or any ship, but lets use Yamato here) has 16 inches of of main belt which im guessing is historically accurate? So with the armor quality of 120% that gives the Yamato a belt of 19.2 Inches of armor. Wouldn't accounting for the increase of armor protection allow you to scale down the inches of belt armor as the % increase can make up for it due to strength and save some weight? This going for every type of armor on the ship.
I think the coefficients for module damage and for damage in general should be significantly decreased depending on the armor hit. For instance a 20 inch HE shell hitting 10 or 100 inches of armor does the same damage. I tested this myself.
Stealth great video as always..... German turrets where Anton, Bruno, Caesar and Dora..... They went in order of A,B,C,D and so on if more ... I know that both these ships had great careers and sadly bad endings but would be an interesting battle to see if HMS Hood against USS Arizona would be like to see which 1 would have went the distance if it was to have happened then.... Of course may there souls RIP all who served on both them great ships but it is just the way both went quick makes me wonder... Keep up good work.
I think Hood vs Arizona would be solidly in favor of the Hood. Hood is so much faster than Arizona that it can easily control the engagement and retreat if it starts to take too much damage, her armor is quite good, almost on par with Arizona's. Armament wise I would say they are about even, maybe Arizona has the edge with more but lighter guns.
Just one question since i don't own the game, has the yamato tower the secondary bridge? the one usually placed between the conning tower and the main bridge. I can see the shape but i can't really see the windows in it
correct me if I'm wrong but weren't the H classes set to be armed with 406/420mm guns respectively if they were built? 20" would mean they were mounted with 508's which seems a little large
Japanese armor plate was shown to be of a significantly inferior quality to American or German armor plate quality. It might even be closer to Krupp II
Idk but I think there was a design of American battle ship that was 70,000 tons the Vermont I think but idk where I remember this exactly but would be interesting to see it fight H-44
@@surlyboomergaming2517 what lead to the loss of all eight of Russia's battleships in 1905 was the fact of untrained crews, poor leadership, an all or nothing armor scheme on the Russian ships as well as the fact Tsar has his ships commit to an 18,000 mile voyage. And they just blundered into the strait without having a scouting force make sure it prudent to do so.
@@nikidesignsolutionsandgami1518 Along with the journey there reducing moral... Seriously, the 2nd pacific squadron was a mess They did technically inform the Japanese of there whereabouts by a scout force... Misidentification
Can you do a rebuild of the Yamato, but using the Modern Battleship II hull since it's the accurate one? It could also save you a bit of weight due to the hull form reduces the needed engine horsepower, thus reduces the engine's weight.
de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-Klasse_(Schlachtschiff) This is the german Wikipedia for h-44. You need to translate it, but there are a few more details for this class. For example it's only 63.400 t, 16 Inch guns and 30kn fast.
Would you take control of the H-44, the AI only sank the one ship then escaped. To me that's incomplete. Pocket BB vs. BC would be nice content. Battle of the H-CA's maybe?
If by Pocket battleships you mean the Panzerschiffes, that would be no contest at all. Deutschland class had only 6 11 inch guns and very weak armor even by cruiser standards. Even Alaska would easily overpower Deutschland.
I'm curious if a single 100k ton German battleship with 4 triple 17" gun could defeat an entire American battle fleet of 2 escalator clause battleships, 4 light cruisers and 6 destroyers... Total displacement of 150k tons, with a 55k ton limit on battleship sizes
![Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts - The Super Bismarck (Alpha 10) [Battleship]](/img/1.gif)
The USS Iowa was sent off to the North Atlantic to block the Tirpitz. Would be cool if see them in action
Yes that would be, it was New Jersey not Iowa but still cool to see
@@bobchoate4403 well I mean the North Carolina was there first before the South Dakota took over with Washington following after when South Dakota went back for repairs and then escorted convoys with Alabama before going to the pacific before Guadalcanal where she took part in escort duties with the Massachusetts being in the Atlantic for operation torch fighting the Vichy battleship Jean Bart which was deployed before completion to halt the landings with Iowa being the last American battleship to be stationed in the Atlantic to deter the Tirpitz the battleships Indiana, Missouri, Wisconsin and finally the one you mentioned New Jersey were never stationed in the Atlantic
@@ussenterprisecv6805 cool I guess
I know it's pRoBaBlY going to be one-sided, but I still really want to see this:
The Battle of the Sisters:
Fusō & Yamashiro vs Nelson & Rodney /// 2v2
It's late 1941, the British Admiralty has agreed to send the HMS Nelson and HMS Rodney to the far-east to reinforce their presence instead of sending HMS Repulse and HMS Prince of Wales--the thought being that the two sister ships should compliment each other well with regards to performance and firepower. The Japanese are waiting and have set a trap--while the main strike force sent to Hawaii is commencing the raid on Pearl Harbor, the Fusō and Yamashiro have been dispatched to the Indian Ocean to blockade any reinforcements being sent via the Suez Canal. The pairs of ships both have the same maximum speed of 23 knots while their armament could also be considered a draw. It's a battle of sisters as the aging dreadnought style ships hold their ground against the advancing British treaty-built battleships.
Fusō-class battleship
Displacement
35,900 long tons (36,500 t) (full load)
Length
202.7 m (665 ft) (overall)
Beam 28.7 m (94 ft 2 in)
Installed power
24 × Miyahara water-tube boilers
40,000 shp (30,000 kW)
Propulsion 4 × shafts; 2 × steam turbine sets
Speed 23 knots (43 km/h; 26 mph)
Range 8,000 nmi (15,000 km; 9,200 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph)
Complement 1,198
Armament
6 × twin 356 mm (14 in) guns
16 × single 152 mm (6 in) guns
6 × 533 mm (21 in) torpedo tubes
Armor
Waterline belt 229-305 mm (9-12 in)
Deck: 32-51 mm (1.3-2.0 in)
Gun turrets: 229-279 mm (9-11 in)
Barbettes: 203-305 mm (8-12 in)
Conning tower: 351 mm (13.8 in)
Nelson-class battleship
Displacement
37,780 long tons (38,390 t) (full load)
Length 709 ft 10 in (216.4 m) o/a
Beam 106 ft (32.3 m)
Installed power
8 × Admiralty 3-drum boilers
45,000 shp (34,000 kW)
Propulsion 2 shafts; 2 geared steam turbines
Speed 23 knots (43 km/h; 26 mph)
Range 7,000 nmi (13,000 km; 8,100 mi) at 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph)
Complement
1,361 (flagship)
Armament
3 × triple 16 in (406 mm) guns
6 × twin 6 in (152 mm) guns
6 × single 4.7 in (120 mm) AA guns
8 × single 2 pdr (40 mm (1.6 in)) AA guns
2 × 24.5 in (622 mm) torpedo tubes
Armour
Waterline belt: 13-14 in (330-356 mm)
Deck: 3.75-6.25 in (95-159 mm)
Barbettes: 12-15 in (305-381 mm)
Gun turrets: 9-16 in (229-406 mm)
Conning tower: 12-14 in (305-356 mm)
Bulkheads: 4-12 in (102-305 mm)
with a comment like that he has to do it
Though wouldn't Vanguard be a better pick for the other Royal Navy ship, with slightly different build priorities the Vanguard would have been ready in time so not unrealistic.
@@dwaynejohnson6644
X3
There were 5 Yamato class ships,
One converted to an aircraft carrier,
Two actually laid down,
Two more no named, but one laid down, the other just planned
Yea, the aircraft carrier was named Shinano and is considered to be one of the first super carriers in history. Too bad it never saw any action as it was sunk by US submarine Archerfish just days after finishing sea trials.
@@evanlong6119 Wasn't even loaded with aircraft I believe
@@evanlong6119 would it actually be beneficial if Shinano were to actually come into service? The Navy was pretty much decimated one way or another so even if they were able to get her online what could she do? Just curious
@@memeologist21 Not really, by late 1944 (which was when the carrier was launched and sunk) the veteran pilots of the Japanese navy were mostly gone. What pilots remained were undertrained rookies who had been rushed to the front to try and stop the allies who were rapidly advancing on japan. The Shinano would have likely been sunk by US aircraft at some point or would have had little impact on the war itself.
Note: The German main and secondary towers have significant base accuracy and accuracy modifiers compared to other towers. Tower modifiers are a factor for me in design, such as the Japanese towers being exceptional for spotting and long range gunnery since they are so tall.
Turret Names on German BBs are:
Main Turret 1: Anton
Main Turret 2: Bruno
Main Turret 3: Caesar
Main Turret 4: Dora
Also my suggestion is:
1 Design A150
vs
1 H44
A Couple Other Suggestions:
Number 13 Class Battleship vs South Dakota Class (1920 Cancelled Class of ships not the 1939 Design of the same name)
Tosa-Class Battleship vs Pennsylvania Class (Post Refit - Arizona)
USS Texas vs Amagi Class Battlecruiser
Do German turrets have names past Dora?
@@halfgecko3202 The Bismarck's turrets were only four in number and turrets were named in line with the turret configuration AB-CD. Hood had a similar naming scheme except it wasn't the turrets themselves, it was the guns which were in this case named after characters in Snow White and the seven dwarfs. In essence, historically, no turrets had actual names to them; however some famous ships had their turrets or individual guns named as "batteries" similar to how they were named for coastal fortifications such as the Atlantic Wall as one example.
Loving these videos.
Would really like to see the uss North Carolina vs the Bismark
Thank you Stealth, it always makes my day seeing the videos you post! Keep up the great work. Once the finances free up, I'll be joining your Patreon!
Going to agree thanks stealth, look forward to these videos everyday!
Thanks man. Glad to hear I'm providing so much entertainment for you :)
@@Stealth17Gaming well i say yes
I am sure a 2 yamato combine to be catamaran will be a powerfull aa defense more big guns to fight
My best wish to Game Lab. We can sit in our home playing games with peace in mind, they don't have that luxury.
Richleu vs. Littorio
Reduce the amount of Krup IV armor to make its effective thickness the same as Krup III. Then you won't get the weight issue :)
Tsesarevich vs Mikasa
Both ship fought and trade blows in battle of the yellow sea in 1904.
You could argue that this fight is just France vs England since both ship were built by foreign nations. Tsesarevich was based on French battleship Jauréguiberry and built at the Forges et Chantiers de la Méditerranée shipyard in La Seyne-sur-Mer, France , while Mikasa was based on the Formidable-class battleships of the Royal Navy with two additional 6-inch and built by Vickers at their Barrow-in-Furness shipyard, Cumbria, North-West England.
Amagi class fast battleship design (it can be the Amagi, or the Tosa, or even the Kii) Vs the Bismarck
That would be cool
If you want to know, the the turrets were "anton bruno caesar dora"
Indeed. I always remembered that part of an old book I had when I was younger (it was about the Bismark, specifically going back and forth between accounts from some of the sailors, and the guys who were operating the Alvin submersible and its support ship to find and explore its wreck).
@@SephirothRyu Kind of an alphabet to be honest
i heard that the iowa class battleship was built to counter the Bismark i would like to see the result if the iowa met the bismark
I doubt this was the case, the iowa was intended to keep up with aircraft carriers.
@@Cat-y4w Well, its possible that it was at least intended to be able to take on the Bismarck evenly, but that it was indeed also meant to keep up with carriers. Perhaps it was first being designed one way, but then had its design altered a bit. Or perhaps Tyler's comment is indeed just hearsay that wasn't actually the case.
It was meant for escorting carriers, and being a counter to the supposed 50,000 ton Yamato...
But it would be a counter to Bismarck too, just not intended historically
US foreign policy was more concerned with Japan and protecting US interests in the Pacific than whatever squabbles went on in continental Europe. The American government used the excuses that the Kongo class was a violation of the washington naval treaty and the fact Japan back out of the London naval treaty to invoke the escalator clause of the London Naval treaty for the Iowa Class.
The Battleship New Jersey was used in case the Tirpitz broke out into the atlantic.
During it's uneventful tour of the North Atlantic they needed a closed weather deck due to it being far colder than designed as the Iowas were designed to escort fast carriers in the warmer Pacific.
There's a far more informative video on the battleship New Jersey channel.
Hey Stealth. How about HMS Warspite and Barham in WW1 build vs RN Vittorio Veneto?
The editor does seem to struggle with super battleships for some reason, especially when messing with the armor.
Can be a fight between kirov and prinz eugen or an other ship of this class?
Potentialy also with leningrad and one of the z destroyers
i do want to note that the montana vs H-44 battle, H-44 was given super heavy shells for it.
Let’s see who rules the waves
Nelson vs Iowa
Iowa is about a decade more advanced...
@@glauberglousger6643 yes I am aware I know he would balance them out if he had too but I would be pretty cool to see
i think you should compare the Nelson to Colorado.
Going bow in with Yamato class allows for a far smaller target whilst still keeping 2/3rds of the firepower.
A more aggressive design as opposed to all round firepower of a AB XY design.
I will repeat my gaggle of battle requests, bar River Plate since that apparently can't be done properly.
Tegethoff vs Gangut; battle of the triple turret WWI dreadnoughts
Admiral Hipper vs Berwick (probably unfair fight)
Nachi vs Salt Lake City
Alaska vs B-65 (might be a bit hard to create)
Yamato just wanted to help course correct her sister ship as her rudder was damaged. :)
About patches/delays to the games development, i purchased it on steam as soon as it came available and don´t regret it since. The way the game is right now it already provided me hours of building and skirmishing around with various scenarios. Sure patches are welcome with fixes and new stuff but to a certain extend i wonder how long the devs can keep this up without selling more content with dlc´s to make some bucks.
Either way, its a great game as is and it is probably only getting better over time either way.
Since this game seems well designed for it and for a change of pace from Dreadnought era ships I want to see the veteran of the Spanish-American and First World War protected cruiser USS Olympia go up against Russo-Japanese war and survivor of the battle of Tsushima the Russian protected cruiser Aurora.
Winner faces pre-dreadnought Mikasa.
Maybe you can make the german Admidal Hipper vs. the american Baltimore
I think making these battles not strict 1v1 but different numbers will help balance them out and make them more interesting. This was my favourite one so far.
If I remember corretly, the german's doctrin was made for cqc as the weather and sea in the nothern Atlantic was very poor, so long range duals were "not planed for"
Anton Bruno Caesar and Dora are what the turrets called in German
The damage instability debuff gets lower as the time goes on, so a massive hit and reduction in structural integrity causes a really big and sudden drop in accuracy, that will be regained over time. Whereas if the damage coming in is gradual it is counteracted by the repairs over a longer time producing a longer lasting but lower drop in accuracy overall.
I'm surprised that the light shells were doing so much. Btw I am working on a custom campaign for from the depths that is heavily inspired by this game.
The power of 20inch guns
U.S.S. Arizona vs IJN Naganto
The Yamato had a bit of a refit after the Musashi sank which gave it more AA guns and the AA guns were triple barrel Type 97 25mm AA guns.
can you do every battleship that sucked in Pearl Harbour vs yamato for revenge
He did do something similar
a battle of the north cape would be decent, scharnhorst v duke of york.
Anton, Bruno, Caesar, Dora. At least, is what i think i recall seeing in a book on Bismarck...
How do you save ship designs in ultimate admiral?
In custom battle, they don't go away after battle. They just stay in the custom battle file. This can lead to you fighting your own ships if you fight a nation at a year you have made ships for, but don't specify what ships they are using.
You cannot currently save/export/import a ship design, unless you goto the custom battle save file and just manually use wordpad or something to extract the ship from it and give it to someone who knows how to insert it into their own file.
Someone should really make an open source program that does that for you so that people can trade ships around until the devs actually consider putting in an import/export feature themselves.
@@SephirothRyu Thanks
8:35 - C turret - Cäsar, D turret - Dora
I would say the A-150 was probably the most realistic design for 20 inch gun with 6 20 inch guns. Getting 8 on a ship is sacrificing to much of other things. 9 18 inch 50's I would say is the max without haven't to sacrifice speed and armour
Speaking of Armor Quality; And I hope you read this here Stealth.
If the Yamato in game (or any ship, but lets use Yamato here) has 16 inches of of main belt which im guessing is historically accurate? So with the armor quality of 120% that gives the Yamato a belt of 19.2 Inches of armor. Wouldn't accounting for the increase of armor protection allow you to scale down the inches of belt armor as the % increase can make up for it due to strength and save some weight? This going for every type of armor on the ship.
HE shells might be a tad bit over-powered.
I think the coefficients for module damage and for damage in general should be significantly decreased depending on the armor hit. For instance a 20 inch HE shell hitting 10 or 100 inches of armor does the same damage. I tested this myself.
IJN Ise vs. USS Texas
Stealth great video as always..... German turrets where Anton, Bruno, Caesar and Dora..... They went in order of A,B,C,D and so on if more ... I know that both these ships had great careers and sadly bad endings but would be an interesting battle to see if HMS Hood against USS Arizona would be like to see which 1 would have went the distance if it was to have happened then.... Of course may there souls RIP all who served on both them great ships but it is just the way both went quick makes me wonder... Keep up good work.
I think Hood vs Arizona would be solidly in favor of the Hood. Hood is so much faster than Arizona that it can easily control the engagement and retreat if it starts to take too much damage, her armor is quite good, almost on par with Arizona's.
Armament wise I would say they are about even, maybe Arizona has the edge with more but lighter guns.
Yes,I want a Yamato catamaran now
HMS Belfast vs IJN Mogami
KMS Hipper vs IJN Takao
As a German I would say the C turret would be Ceasar
1 h-44 and 2 other battle cruisers vs 15 heavy cruisers of ur choice (armed with 11 inch main guns)
Pov you see secondary rush and sniper player in brawler
Id love to see KGV vs Scharnshorst
yay I love ur vids so much :)
Main turrets for German BB's are Anton, Bertha, Caesar, and Dora.
French Alsace, Jean Bart or Republique might be interesting
There is now a hull which basically is Yamato’s Hull
Tournament of Legends perhaps soon?
There was an old PS/PS2 game that had a catamarran Yamato. I think it was Warship Gunner series?
Would love to see the Italian Battleship Littorio vs Bismarck
Jean Bart vs Massachusetts
Great Gameplay Bro 💪😎
U.S.S. Arizona vs IJN
Just one question since i don't own the game, has the yamato tower the secondary bridge? the one usually placed between the conning tower and the main bridge. I can see the shape but i can't really see the windows in it
USS. Massachusetts vs Jean bart round 2
I believe the turrets for the Germans were Anton, Bruno, Ceaser, and Dora.
A,B,C and D turrets wich is Alpha Bravo Charlie and Delta.
"Imagine not firing HE at angle BB"
-Yuro
Maybe try out Battle of North Cape. Duke of York VS Scharnhorst but play as Scharnhorst.
ARA Rivadavia vs Almirante Latorre (Clash on the South)
Jaja Aguante Argentina.
correct me if I'm wrong but weren't the H classes set to be armed with 406/420mm guns respectively if they were built? 20" would mean they were mounted with 508's which seems a little large
Various H-classes seemed to carry various different armaments.
Japanese armor plate was shown to be of a significantly inferior quality to American or German armor plate quality. It might even be closer to Krupp II
Hello, Stealth.
The USS Tennessee versus the HMS Royal oak
The USS Missouri and the HMS Queen Elizabeth versus the Tirpitz and Musashi
What about a fight between shikishima and H-44 ,that would be battel of the big gun 😯😯
What would H45 vs. Super Yamato A-150 or Montana Class be?
Anton, Berta, Caesar, Dora
Gotta commend the germans. Even paper ships can get horribly over-engineered. I'd like to see something under AI control kill this thing
If I recall correctly, Bismarck had a double hull bottom, not triple.
Idk but I think there was a design of American battle ship that was 70,000 tons the Vermont I think but idk where I remember this exactly but would be interesting to see it fight H-44
Vermont class is pure fantasy made up by Wargaming.
@@Silamon2 still would an interesting fight tho
Love the videos Arizona against Fuso
German Turrets - Anton / Bruno / Caesar / Dora
How about Super Yamato vs H-44 triple barrel version
you should do H-44 vs Super alsasc
Anton - Bruno - Caesar - Dora
Can we conclude that HE is OP? Just thinking if HE was so effective, why wasn't it used in r/l fleet encounters...or was it?
The Russo Japanese war. The IJN used all HE in their ships, and sunk most of the Russian Baltic fleet in 1905 during the battle of the tsushima strait
@@nikidesignsolutionsandgami1518 did not know this. Thanks! Now I wonder about WWII battles, especially those around Guadalcanal.
@@surlyboomergaming2517 what lead to the loss of all eight of Russia's battleships in 1905 was the fact of untrained crews, poor leadership, an all or nothing armor scheme on the Russian ships as well as the fact Tsar has his ships commit to an 18,000 mile voyage. And they just blundered into the strait without having a scouting force make sure it prudent to do so.
@@nikidesignsolutionsandgami1518 Along with the journey there reducing moral...
Seriously, the 2nd pacific squadron was a mess
They did technically inform the Japanese of there whereabouts by a scout force...
Misidentification
Can you do pls the roma class batleships against like bismarck and tirpitz i think that would be a great battle legendary ships against one a nother
The H-44 is basically Preussen from Warships lol
How about KMS Tirpitz vs HMS Vanguard?
Can you do a rebuild of the Yamato, but using the Modern Battleship II hull since it's the accurate one? It could also save you a bit of weight due to the hull form reduces the needed engine horsepower, thus reduces the engine's weight.
Hi stealth!
Hello there!
Fight the Yamato against 2 Montanas
Do the IJN A-150 vs the H-44
de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-Klasse_(Schlachtschiff)
This is the german Wikipedia for h-44.
You need to translate it, but there are a few more details for this class.
For example it's only 63.400 t, 16 Inch guns and 30kn fast.
That is but the H41. If you read a bit further, you will find that the H44 in fact was much bigger
Oh shit, you are right. I completely missed that.
@@stinkerchen2006 you're welcome. Finally my intense reading on Wikipedia has payed off
Would you take control of the H-44, the AI only sank the one ship then escaped. To me that's incomplete. Pocket BB vs. BC would be nice content. Battle of the H-CA's maybe?
If by Pocket battleships you mean the Panzerschiffes, that would be no contest at all. Deutschland class had only 6 11 inch guns and very weak armor even by cruiser standards. Even Alaska would easily overpower Deutschland.
I also wanna see andria Doria vs. scharnhorest (11inch gun variant)
24:40 - you can tell yamashiro is the flagship because it has a flag over its hp bar.
Oh never noticed that. Thanks!
Satsuma vs H-44
Still not equal, USS Tillman would be a better match
U know satsuma is a super battleship right?
The super bb from wows
Scharnhorst vs Alaska
I see steath is using WoW tactics, load HE and just let the ship burn.
I'm curious if a single 100k ton German battleship with 4 triple 17" gun could defeat an entire American battle fleet of 2 escalator clause battleships, 4 light cruisers and 6 destroyers... Total displacement of 150k tons, with a 55k ton limit on battleship sizes
It's Anton, Bruno, Cesar, Dora
YAMATO VS BISMARCK
So when do the ARP ships come out
6:10 why does the game think a heavy cruiser will have 20 inch guns
Iowa vs Tirpitz
Anton Bravo Caesar and DIETRICH