Great interview, very relaxed and easy going. The whole sudden influx of murder mystery tourists will whittle down quickly but at the same time isn't it great to have more visitors to such a beautiful place. I did the trip myself recently but I parked the car at kaelfadda bridge and walked to the scene so as to not add any unnecessary extra annoyance to the locals. I found that so many cars drive up the wee road to the house and then have all kinds of problems turning and reversing, I can understand why the locals are annoyed with them. I also found it strange that so many didn't even get out of their cars, they didn't stand and give a thought or a prayer, nothing, I found that very sad. RIP Sophie.
Good story . Yes the interview was relaxed as there was no point in dwelling into the case again with so much content out there . This was a follow up and hopefully this investigation gets opened again for closure for all effected by this tragedy
Do people not talk getting interviewed ? Let’s not talk about me giving people a platform the man has just featured on a sky and Netflix documentary series . So if you want to have a go at a fella recording in a conservatory in Kilkenny go ahead but make sure you complain to those two big companies as well about platforms . Sound
The coat thing was ridiculous. On Netflix the senior detective was saying that the coat was missing. Maybe he should have looked in his own evidence locker, it was in there!
@@rusroydon8470 Which bit? The senior detective said the coat was missing, it is literally said by him on the documentary. Yet the Sky documentary shows the actual Gardai documents stating that the coat was taken as evidence and samples cut from it. Jules said it was never returned. The detective is a liar.
@@zed351 I haven't seen that documentary as I'm not joining sky for it, but I am doing my best to get it for free. I did read the dpp report, but don't remember anything about it. So is it fair to say Netflix documentary is probably garbage, and quite possibly Ian bailey is another Colin stagg or Barry George?
@@rusroydon8470 It is indeed quite possible that Bailey is a Colin Stagg. The Netflix one was very biased in presentation, anything that pointed to Bailey's innocence or Gardai corruption was played down or not mentioned at all. The Sky one shows the actual documents referring to the coat being taken as evidence and cut for samples. Why then does the Netflix one suggest that the coat was missing, why does the detective get to lie and say that it was missing? We know why, because they want you to believe it was burnt when it wasn't. That is how dishonest the maker of the Netflix one is and how much in bed he was with the Gardai and Sophie's family. Even the DPP report states the following, "At page 19 of Dr. Geraldine O'Donnell's statement she refers to Bailey's clothing which included one black/dark navy overcoat (P.J. 24) and states that she found no damage on the clothing of Ian Bailey." So even the DPP report shows that the coat was taken as evidence.
@@CheapHeatProductionsPodcast I didn’t care much for the Netflix documentary I found the JS more balanced abs we got to see the type of individual Bailey is abs how alcohol is very much at the centre of all his issues ..
@@opencurtinIt doesn’t make him the perpetrator of this crime. If alcohol only was a factor in such cases, half of Ireland could be equally deemed guilty of such a crime
Thanks for this. Very strange the way he doesn't show his whole face. No eye contact either. It's literally harder to look away from the camera phone you're holding.
The connection on Ian’s end was very bad visually and I don’t know if that effected his vision of me ! Rural broadband in a nutshell that one. Thanks for watching though
@@zed351 true, he may not have had video on so as to keep the signal. The thing I don't get is why is he so anti the Irish justice system when it's the only thing keeping him from being shipped to France already??? If this happened in France he'd be in prison or worse.
Have you seen the latest about the witness who has come forward? From The Mirror: "A witness has come forward to gardai working on the Sophie Toscan du Plantier case with a fresh statement about the 1996 murder. An elderly man gave an account claiming another person had confessed to him that they had helped clean blood-stained clothing after the murder. It is understood the West Cork resident, who knew the French filmmaker, got in touch with a solicitor in the wake of two new documentaries about the unsolved case. He made a new sworn statement at Bantry Garda station on Thursday in which he discloses the “confession” to him about bloodied garments. In a three-hour interview with gardai the man, who has previously given other statements, claims there was a face-to-face conversation at a named premises in 2001. He said the other person appeared to be in fear and he told them to contact gardai, but that did not happen."
He has been arrested and thrown into cells and had his life destroyed by accusation and innuendo for 25 years and it resulted in his relationship ending. He has been convicted of murder by a kangaroo court in France, had extradition requests and European arrest warrants. He has every right to talk about his life being affected.
Innocent people should never take a Polygraph test. If it shows that you are innocent, people will still think you are guilty anyway! If it gives an indeterminant result, people who think you are guilty will continue to say you are guilty. Polygraph testing is pseudo science nonsense, it is why courts don't allow them as evidence. There is absolutely no benefit from an innocent person taking one.
@@marcusregan4815 I am not being duped, I follow the evidence of which there is none of any worth. Read the DPP report to understand why they did not even charge Bailey.
@@marcusregan4815 It is more than a "lack of proof". It is highly critical of the "evidence" and this is coming from the PROSECUTION. When the prosecution themselves pull apart the evidence, then that reveals much about the guilt or innocence of the accused.
Great podcast, thank you!
Thanks for listening
Great interview, very relaxed and easy going. The whole sudden influx of murder mystery tourists will whittle down quickly but at the same time isn't it great to have more visitors to such a beautiful place. I did the trip myself recently but I parked the car at kaelfadda bridge and walked to the scene so as to not add any unnecessary extra annoyance to the locals. I found that so many cars drive up the wee road to the house and then have all kinds of problems turning and reversing, I can understand why the locals are annoyed with them. I also found it strange that so many didn't even get out of their cars, they didn't stand and give a thought or a prayer, nothing, I found that very sad. RIP Sophie.
Good story . Yes the interview was relaxed as there was no point in dwelling into the case again with so much content out there . This was a follow up and hopefully this investigation gets opened again for closure for all effected by this tragedy
That wasn’t an interview, you just gave him a platform to talk.
Do people not talk getting interviewed ? Let’s not talk about me giving people a platform the man has just featured on a sky and Netflix documentary series . So if you want to have a go at a fella recording in a conservatory in Kilkenny go ahead but make sure you complain to those two big companies as well about platforms . Sound
Paul,
Feel free to interview him yourself then.
Such a gentle giant. LOLZ!
The coat thing was ridiculous. On Netflix the senior detective was saying that the coat was missing. Maybe he should have looked in his own evidence locker, it was in there!
More questions than answers from the investigation team
Where is the proof of that statement?
@@rusroydon8470
Which bit? The senior detective said the coat was missing, it is literally said by him on the documentary. Yet the Sky documentary shows the actual Gardai documents stating that the coat was taken as evidence and samples cut from it. Jules said it was never returned.
The detective is a liar.
@@zed351 I haven't seen that documentary as I'm not joining sky for it, but I am doing my best to get it for free. I did read the dpp report, but don't remember anything about it. So is it fair to say Netflix documentary is probably garbage, and quite possibly Ian bailey is another Colin stagg or Barry George?
@@rusroydon8470
It is indeed quite possible that Bailey is a Colin Stagg.
The Netflix one was very biased in presentation, anything that pointed to Bailey's innocence or Gardai corruption was played down or not mentioned at all. The Sky one shows the actual documents referring to the coat being taken as evidence and cut for samples. Why then does the Netflix one suggest that the coat was missing, why does the detective get to lie and say that it was missing?
We know why, because they want you to believe it was burnt when it wasn't. That is how dishonest the maker of the Netflix one is and how much in bed he was with the Gardai and Sophie's family.
Even the DPP report states the following, "At page 19 of Dr. Geraldine O'Donnell's statement she refers to Bailey's clothing which
included one black/dark navy overcoat (P.J. 24) and states that she found no damage on the clothing of Ian Bailey." So even the DPP report shows that the coat was taken as evidence.
Garda got rid of the gate...
The Jim Sheridan showed how Bailey acts under the influence of alcohol thats the one thing I was waiting to see ..
It’s ten times more detailed that Netflix
@@CheapHeatProductionsPodcast I didn’t care much for the Netflix documentary I found the JS more balanced abs we got to see the type of individual Bailey is abs how alcohol is very much at the centre of all his issues ..
@@opencurtinIt doesn’t make him the perpetrator of this crime. If alcohol only was a factor in such cases, half of Ireland could be equally deemed guilty of such a crime
This was so good! I need to watch ALL the Sophie docs now.
Thank you. What Sinead O'Connor did was disgusting, she really is a very disturbed person.
What did Sinead O'Connor say? It's cutting out when he's talking about her.
Brilliant job bud 👏
Thanks dude
@PC correct
Thanks for this. Very strange the way he doesn't show his whole face. No eye contact either. It's literally harder to look away from the camera phone you're holding.
The connection on Ian’s end was very bad visually and I don’t know if that effected his vision of me ! Rural broadband in a nutshell that one. Thanks for watching though
He's not the brightest bloke when it comes to smartphones. It's what my parents would do, they have no idea where the camera is!
@@zed351 audio wise it’s fine that’s all that matters
@@CheapHeatProductionsPodcast
Indeed, it's just the assumption from others that everybody knows how to use a smartphone!
@@zed351 true, he may not have had video on so as to keep the signal.
The thing I don't get is why is he so anti the Irish justice system when it's the only thing keeping him from being shipped to France already???
If this happened in France he'd be in prison or worse.
Have you seen the latest about the witness who has come forward? From The Mirror:
"A witness has come forward to gardai working on the Sophie Toscan du Plantier case with a fresh statement about the 1996 murder.
An elderly man gave an account claiming another person had confessed to him that they had helped clean blood-stained clothing after the murder.
It is understood the West Cork resident, who knew the French filmmaker, got in touch with a solicitor in the wake of two new documentaries about the unsolved case.
He made a new sworn statement at Bantry Garda station on Thursday in which he discloses the “confession” to him about bloodied garments.
In a three-hour interview with gardai the man, who has previously given other statements, claims there was a face-to-face conversation at a named premises in 2001.
He said the other person appeared to be in fear and he told them to contact gardai, but that did not happen."
Read that this morning interesting to see what comes of it
@@CheapHeatProductionsPodcast i’m ian bailey
Class stuff maurice. I really don't think he did it
Thanks for watching bud
@@CheapHeatProductionsPodcast Ah sure look, anything for the local RUclipsr 😉
It was a sophisticated French hitman with intimate knowledge of rural West Cork, who left his gun and silencer on the nitelink bus from Skib.
@@marcusregan4815 Really? That sounds a bit strange, I couldn't see a sophisticated hitman leaving behind the murder weapon
@@Edvard.Munchkin its true.
18 Jack Burton Comments.
Jack Burtan is Ian Bailey
@@conflictmagazine5412
You are Pierre-Louis Baudey then. See how I can accuse you of being somebody you are not.
SMH
@@zed351 you'll be in France soon Bailey, and your thousands of youtube comments won't be worth a damn.
@@zed351 Bon voyage Bailey, you'll be eating French meat this time next year..
@@kayakwestnow4788Deplorable comment
Random Task Is Ian Bailey so is Jack Burton.
Hmmmmmm🤔
He talks about how it has _affected_ his life 🙄
He has been arrested and thrown into cells and had his life destroyed by accusation and innuendo for 25 years and it resulted in his relationship ending. He has been convicted of murder by a kangaroo court in France, had extradition requests and European arrest warrants. He has every right to talk about his life being affected.
@@marcusregan4815
FYI Your comments have disappeared from our conversation in the other thread.
Why Why Why does he not take a Lie Detector Test ? Why has this Country not Insisted on it ? Surely it would put an end to All speculation .
Innocent people should never take a Polygraph test.
If it shows that you are innocent, people will still think you are guilty anyway!
If it gives an indeterminant result, people who think you are guilty will continue to say you are guilty.
Polygraph testing is pseudo science nonsense, it is why courts don't allow them as evidence. There is absolutely no benefit from an innocent person taking one.
@@marcusregan4815
Not surprising since there is no evidence that he murdered Sophie.
@@marcusregan4815
Fortunately civilised countries don't throw people in jail based on village gossip.
@@marcusregan4815
I am not being duped, I follow the evidence of which there is none of any worth. Read the DPP report to understand why they did not even charge Bailey.
@@marcusregan4815
It is more than a "lack of proof". It is highly critical of the "evidence" and this is coming from the PROSECUTION.
When the prosecution themselves pull apart the evidence, then that reveals much about the guilt or innocence of the accused.