An Interview With Ian Bailey
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 дек 2021
- I sit down to interview Ian Bailey on a trip to rugged West Cork. It's the 25th anniversary of the murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier. It's a divisive and compelling case that holds a grip on the nation as the fabric of this story continues to unravel. Ian talks about how he uses poetry as a means of escapism, the murder trial and the subsequent fallout from this decades long saga. Nobody was ever charged in connection with the murder and Ian remains a fugitive having being sentenced to twenty-five years in a French court.
#TonightWithKev
#Cork
#Ireland
#PureCork
#WestCork
#MurderAtTheCottage
#Schull
#SophieToscanduPlantier
#IanBailey
#Sophie
#ChatShow
#Drone
#TrueCrime
They never looked into that blue car. On an earlier Sophie programme 2 elderly farmers stated they saw a blue car speeding from the direction of Sophie's house at 7.30 am they remarked it had strange numberplates the same as the one driven by the wife of a gardai ( the garda was Sophie's lover,) they reported it to the garda . nothing done. The gardà didn't make a cock up of the case. They destroyed and ignored the evidence Why was that car there at 7.30 am and who was driving it? The two farmers couldn't see if driver was male or female it was travelling so fast down a boreen a dirt road. I feel so sorry for Ian.his whole life ruined for the sake of a cover up. There is room for another documentary, where all this evidence is included. The clump of hair clutched in Sophie's fist. didn't match Ian's DNA gardai said it was Sophie's why would her hair be in her fist. Hair has since been lost, blood in her boot,didn't match Baileys or Sophie's. Whos blood ? Has it disappeared as well?
Excellent view I totally agree with you regarding the case ,I believe he was an easy patsy for the gaurds ,the blue car has never been brought up really and should be been looked into ,personally think people turned a blind because of their dislike of bailey,also that area is bit strange been down a couple of times and you feel your been watched by the snobs yet they welcomed ex pats in for yrs yet look down at their own
He's told us not once but twice that he killed her. He broke down when drunk one new years eve when drinking with a local couple at their home. He also admitted it to a lad in a car one night he was giving a lift to. Innocent men don't confess to murdering someone.
@@carpe1959 People who are innocent don't admit to murder. No one else in the country was joking, pretending or trying to shock anyone by stating that they were responsible for her murder. Coincidentally, he remains the only suspect and lived only a few kilometres from her house. The locals were of the view that only a local would have known the byroads to the house.
@@carpe1959 He's confessed to it twice. Innocent people don't joke, shock or try to scare people by suggesting they killed her.
@@carpe1959 The 15 year old boy in the car didn't ask him. The couple drinking with him on New years eve didn't ask him. He came out because his defences were down with dfimm and he was overcome with guilt.
It's called attention seeking ,narcissist are great at it doesn't mean he did it was to easy for the gaurds to point fingers at him and say ye he did it ,he lived a fair distance from her and definitely couldn't of been near kill fada bridge ,I believe it was someone else closer to local to crookhaven, schull seems to be mentioned all the time but toomore is closer to goleen and crookhaven, she knew the person or she wouldn't have opened the door
" Innocent men don't confess to murdering someone."
It is fortunate then that he didn't confess to anybody, isn't it. If you had bothered to read the context of these so-called "confessions" to people, you would know that he was using sarcasm in response tor accusations made to him. It's all in the leaked 2001 Irish DPP report that you obviously haven't bothered to read before spouting your nonsense comment.
I just can’t make my mind up about his guilt. I find him grandiose and narcissistic but he also comes off as credible and even likeable at times. I am veering towards guilt but there’s part of me that thinks, God maybe he didn’t do it.
Regardless of that, we should remember Sophie not Ian Bailey. Rest in peace Sophie, a beautiful spirit who was loved by many people. The Netflix documentary showed the raw pain that is still so fresh even after 25 years.
@@cstevens1569
The Netflix one had Sophie's cousin as a producer. It is why it left out pretty much anything that pointed to Bailey being innocent.
You MUST read the leaked 2001 DPP which explain why they did not charge him on two occasions, it is what swung me to innocent.
Search for this term and you'll find it.
Sophie Toscan Du Plantier DPP File 2001 pdfcoffee
He’s a psychopath. They are often extremely charming and persuasive.
@@user-fb3pu3qx3t
It is irrelevant what you think of him, evidence matters and there is none of any worth pointing to Bailey.
I was in journalism college with Bailey and knew him most of his time afterwards living in the UK. I visited him Gloucestershire, Newent, where he lived with his first wife - who left him because of his violent nature - and subsequently in London. In 91, when he was in debt to the Inland Revenue and had reneged on a property mortgage in West London... I helped him load up a small van so that he could 'slip away' to hide in Ireland. He returned to London shortly after the du Plantier murder, where, over dinner in my apartment, I pressed him on his involvement after he told me that on the night she was killed he'd been howling drunk on the hills close to her home. He became very agitated, threatened me with a knife. And, after an argument, where it was patently obvious he was culpable, I managed to get him to leave. I know (knew) Ian Bailey very well. Friends for many years, I was always aware of his tendency to snap violence. Now, reading news and watching these videos (full of absolute trumped-up rubbish...) it's obvious that Bailey, in the face of such a grotesque crime, managed to hone his deceit to such an extent that many have been convinced (ie Jim Sheridan... who knows nothing of the man) of his innocence. His verbal tics, mannerism of deception are only to familiar to me... I hope soon the truth about his involvement in this tragic murder will be uncovered.
Who drank out of one of two wine glasses
Huge amount of detail on completely irrelevant things. People tend to do that when telling a story that might not be entirely true.
People tend to do it because they are the sort who ramble on. It means nothing. The guy is the pub bore.
May he rest in peace in God's Loving Embrace✝
What!
RIP Ian Bailey. Reading the 2001 director of public prosecutions report it's clear that not only did they believe that there wasn't enough evidence to charge him with the murder but that he was innocent man.
Recently watched the Netflix doc and read the 2001 director "ppr", plus a few other sources. I believe he was innocent.
@@thomasbroderick767 I think the same
Ian’s life was destroyed by those who were determined to protect the real perpetrator of this crime - he was framed by the Gardai. Anyone who cares for the truth should read the awardwinning journalist Gemma O’Doherty’s article about the framing of Ian by a corrupt police force and the Irish Government. Also the analysis by Bridget Chappuis, a former senior forensic investigator for the Met Police in the UK who revealed vital evidence that was overlooked by the Gardai. She concluded that he was 100% innocent. Finally, the DPP totally vindicated Ian. This entire saga is a shameful stain on the island of Ireland, that an innocent man was hounded to his death by ruthless people in positions of power in Ireland.
I'm 50/50 on it
He said he was not the killer. RIP
Could the person in the kitchen have have made any more noise? Very rude and ignorant, whomever it was.
Something is definitely off the charts about him. I wouldnt trust the Ian Bailey with my hamster. Does that make him a murderer? Tough one to call..
He is a good orator for sure a very charming man ,but he is hiding behind a fascade . Maybe it is time for Jules to tells what she knows.
Jules booted him out ages ago and insists he is innocent. Even Jules' daughters, who hate Bailey, support his innocence.
Get a grip.
She knows he is innocent, that he was framed
Calling Irish crafty! 😂 I'm be insulted if the question wasn't so backward.
After 26 Years, nobody but Bailey has fitted the profile for this murder (absolutely nobody else became a person of interest) After listening to the 13 episodes of West Cork produced by Jenifer & Sam Bungy, it’s clear listening to not only Bailey side of his story, but also the people that propagated his life in Schull, Bailey talked loosely about his involvement on that night, knowing more than he should have done when reporting back to news outlets and newspapers the day after the murder, his injury’s, and of course his history of violence towards women. The only reason Bailey is still free in Ireland is because the Irish police force was still in 1996 - 20 years behind technical forensic developments, there have been plenty of murders on the mizen peninsula over the years that were never recorded as murder but accidents, Jim Sheridan’s true crime documentary does an injustice to Sophie’s family alleging another phantom individual was in the frame for this murder, a new cold case investigation has been indicated, this might finally end all the conjecture with modern DNA procedures, we might finally get an answer.
Plenty of people fit the profile. The police had over fifty suspects, yet in only ten days that was one. How is that even possible? It demonstrates how much they bothered to investigate other suspects, such as George Pecout and Karl Heinz Wolney for example.
He did not know more than anybody else, that is nonsense. He knew her neighbour Alfie Lyons, within minutes of the discovery of the body they would have been on the telephone to their friends revealing who the victim was, the town would have known more than the Dublin detectives. Investigations into the police revealed that local police were leaking information to the media.
The reason he is free is because he has not been charged with the crime. The Irish DPP made it clear in their 2001 report why. There is nowhere near a level of evidence to charge him.
There was DNA tested by the French investigators, it was not Baileys.
What "profile" does Bailey actually fit Alun? He's a male (killer must have been male right?), he's quite tall and strong (must have been someone tall and strong to murder a woman so viciously?), and he has a history of domestic violence (because anyone who has a history of domestic violence against a partner is also capable of killing a woman they didn't know or barely knew).
That "profile" I just listed could apply to many many men in the area, unfortunately domestic violence isn't all that uncommon. Thing is, there's a big difference between violence against a partner (someone you share a life/home/finances, with) and a random woman who (depending on who you believe) Bailey didn't even know or very barely knew. Bailey isn't known to have a "history of violence towards women". He's known to have a history of violence towards one woman, his long term partner. That's very different to the idea of violence against women in general and I believe it's wrong to take it out of context.
For what it's worth, your comment regarding Bailey knowing more than he should have is very much false. A few months back a Reddit user went to the trouble of gathering over 300 articles relating to he case, all from the days and weeks after the murder. It was found that in general, Bailey DID NOT know more than he should have at any point. That any of the more "eyebrow raising" comments in Bailey's articles, were also featured in other newspapers, by other journalists on the same day or even the day previous! It amazes me that the narrative of him knowing too much continues. I'd be happy to link this Reddit post to you if you were interested in reviewing it for yourself.
I might add that I'm not saying that he's innocent. All I'm saying is that I find it amazing and frightening that people continue on this path of "it must be him, sure who else could it have been, and he's very strange and full of himself and creepy", without actually looking objectively at the evidence in the case.
Well constructed reply, I literally go be the original podcast that the Bungys had with Bailey in 2018, pretty much his first interviews given to a public forum since the murder, not the Jim sherrdan circus personally I would entertain the notion of a female murder due to the ferocious of the crime scene, a woman scorned and all, I would entertain where did Sofie go to shower as the boiler was not working in the house (who was elected to carry out repairs) I would also revisit her interaction with a promanant French family who she passed by visiting 3 castles head on the afternoon of the murder, pretty much the last people she interacted with, Yes Bailey has been the only person of interest and local people unresoundly feel he was the person responsible, however there have been a few murders in that area over the years, from pub rights / fatal assaults and brothers Killing each other and moving to America in the 70s and 80s. Let's see how the reopening of this case fairies over the coming year.
@@alunstevenfennell1042 Thanks Alun. I definitely feel the podcast is the best overall source of info on the case, but it's best to review as many sources as possible of course, including the DPP report. The JS and Netflix docs leave a lot to be desired.
Interesting point about the boiler and the shower etc. I have seen conflicting reports that the heating had been fixed by the time she arrived, or that it hadn't. I don't believe it actually was. I believe Sophie was quite friendly with that French family, (the Ungerers) particularly the husband who she was looking to work with on a project.
I feel the problem with this case is that its very much become "did Bailey kill Sophie?", when it should be "who killed Sophie?". You present your prime suspect and show how you can make him fit the case like that and you very much will have a scenario where the focus is placed entirely on that person. I believe it's not that difficult to make a person fit whatever you want to make them fit. It's known that Sophie didn't entirely get on with her neighbour Alfie, that she would complain about things like the entrance gate being left open, etc. It's also stated that Alfie actually had a bandage on his hand in the days after the murder as he had been bitten by a dog. Now lets say it transpired that Alfie had stayed up late that night on his own, and his partner didn't remember him coming to bed... Well now he has no alibi so maybe he should be in the frame? For the record, I certainly don't think it was Alfie, but I'm just making the point as to how easy it can be to sway public opinion with entirely circumstantial evidence.
Anyway, as you said, it will be interesting to see where this goes in the near future now that it's been reopened. Cheers.
Alun - I listened to all 13 episodes of the West Cork podcast, I did not come away with the impression Ian Bailey was the killer. The fact no one else was properly investigated is not evidence of Ian’s guilt, just evidence of the polices’ tunnel vision & incompetence. Ian is an unusual & charismatic person, I suspect he has neurodiversity issues & processes information differently which is evidenced in how he uses language & how he interacts with others in ways that can seem bizarre. Unfortunately for Ian, some people interpret his strangeness as meaning he is guilty without doubt. But I do doubt it. I also doubt anyone could maintain their innocence for 26 years without tripping themselves up, so I conclude he is innocent until proven guilty in an Irish court of law because France’s wholly one-sided kangaroo court does not count!
Can't believe you've asked him to recite his poem. 😂 🤦♂️ I admire your composure.
Haha love it❤!
@@brianmcginley2743What a disgusting comment
Regardless of whether or not he committed the murder, I find it absolutely disgusting how he relishes in the fame he has gained through this tragic event. He's a failed journalist, a failed poet, he vastly overestimates his own intelligence and he leaves out no opportunity to show off his pictures and poems and tell the world about himself. What a truly ghastly person.
Judge not lest thou be judged, your comment is disgusting, you obviously have some issues.
He’s had his life defined & ruined by the persistent accusation that he is a murderer without ever being charged with any crime. I don’t blame him for continuing to talk about it & protest his innocence.
@@mpat100 would argue that calling someone’s poetry shit is far less disgusting than beating your partner up, Ian 🙃 after all it is the truth.
@@wintergirll miss goody 2 shoes
@@mpat100 proud of it 🤓
Gives the same vibe as Richard Satchwell. Seems to enjoy the interviews a lot.
Great job Kevin, hope to see more of this. Barry OB - CBC
Thanks Barry
Jules said he never did a lick of work on her gardens but he did gardening for Sophie's neighbor?
Wouldn't read too much into that.
Would someone have not asked whomever the fk is in the kitchen do they want a loud hailer also to make a bit more noise, sweet J#sus
Exactly! Had to give up because it's so annoying. Maybe they hate Bailey.
Innocent man
Ball locks.
@@johnmc3862
Feel free to share your vast knowledge of the evidence you obviously have that the Barristers at the DPP, who refused to charge him TWICE, have not seen.
I suspect your "evidence" will be rambling nonsense from Netflix.
@@JackBurton-qp4hc
Or nothing at all since he has not replied and run away!
Poor police work never found closure for this lady's family. Perhaps the real murderer is still out there, who knows. Ian Bailey may have paid a high price for a crime he may never committed.
Most psychopathic murders have no recollection of the event..Most people would be devastated with a false accusation of murder...not turn it into self promotion..
That is interesting. I thought that if he did kill Sophie, he had blacked out somehow in rage and had no memory of it, hence his ability to say he had nothing to do with it (but he would know if he met her and went to her that night though). Jules had said that Ian's behaviour was sudden and explosive re his violence in past which is what the frenzied attack on sophie looked like.
@@browser6884
That's a lot of whataboutery when there is zero evidence that he was actually at the scene. Not remembering is irrelevant when there is no forensic evidence he was even there!
Has anyone read his book?
was that why the Gate went missing and other key evidence.
I don’t understand why everyone is stuck up on the missing gate... Evidence goes missing all the time, almost in every cold case something gets lost, that’s just part of life. I wish people would relax about the stupid gate
@@Julia_F_i_r
"Evidence goes missing all the time"
I am not sure the family of Sophie would take comfort in your indifference to evidence.
@@random6809 Ha! Are YOU one of them? Listen, we are all human, we make mistakes, loose shit and so on... I am not being indifferent, we all have to realize that it happens. For some reason people think police can read minds, predict crimes and store things well, they are not robots my friend, but even robots break 😆😆
@@Julia_F_i_r
Losing your glasses is not the same as losing evidence that could convict a murderer.
@@random6809 Of course it’s not the same thing, i agree.. And i agree, it shouldn’t have been lost, but we don’t know, maybe they swiped the blood or scraped it off, i don’t remember hearing anything like this though...
The evidence is kept in a large wearhouse or in a large basement, shelves and shelves of it. Case is not solved right away, it will be moved or lost, sometimes they misplace it and find it later, by accident. Could be lost on its way to the lab or back. It all comes to us being human and making mistakes, even the best of us. And what is the point of talking about lost evidence, it’s gone, just forget about it. Or you’d want to punish them for losing it? How is it gonna help in any way? I agree, it’s HORRIBLE that it was lost, there was blood on it, a lot of people actually think that’s exactly why it was lost, exactly because it had blood of supposable corrupt murder cop who killed her and framed the poor journalist. I don’t think so, i think not only that he did it, but i will bet that it is not the first murder (or maybe a near murder assault) he did. Why did he change his name (just his first name, but still) and moved across the country? People don’t do that just on a whim. USUALLY people don’t. Could happen though... We know he’s been beating his gf senseless, he didn’t just start doing it suddenly, most likely he was doing it to women before, he did have a wife, i would have given anything to interview her and ask her a few questions. That’s just my opinion though, but i didn’t just take it out of the sky, i think it’s logical and needs to be investigated. Or maybe it was and they couldn’t find any evidence to it. Or lost it 🤣🤣🤣
He and OJ Simpson would be excellent cell mates.
true, both innocent
Terrible interview. Bailey fully controlled the interviewer.
Irish state and French justice distorted this man,,Irish state set him up with false witness to lie, hope he found peace,
He does seem quiet sober n this interview, most interviews on radio r tv he looks n sounds drunk, Bailey is guilty, who else n west cork would do this murder, no its him alright, guards did mess up BIG time, n thats why Bailey isn't n Jail, he is a narcissistic person who feels no great remorse n still lives n west cork, just shows the neck of the man, wouldn't any person not from area accused of such a serious crime guilty r innocent hav left by now, no Bailey loves the attention n made a career out of the tragedy, doing interviews at drop of his hat, he is everywhere just check on RUclips alone all the interviews he has done... Shame he was never convicted here.
" Who else in West Cork would do this", thanks for your amazing factual evidence, you should look for a spare place in a linch mob sometime 😉
i reply to you both kinda :)
It’s a legitimate thought, if not him, then who else? I thought so too when i was watching netflix’s Sofie... then i took some time to think about it.. There were a lot of “blow-ins”, that kind of crowd has all sorts of people, someone could’ve just quickly left after the murder, and i mean move away, far away.. So only the locals and maybe the guardai would know that. And they all are SURE it was him 😊😊 Anyways, the question “if not him, then who” is a part of investigation, it is one of many many questions that needs to be answered in order to be sure “beyond doubt” Legally, there is a doubt, reasonable doubt, that’s why he is not charged.
@@Julia_F_i_r it may be a legitimate thought but as you know, people cannot be convicted on this basis. I think people need to be very careful here, there is huge pressure to find the killer, some people may believe Mr Bailey is not the nicest person in the world , this is a perfect atmosphere for a wrongful conviction. I would be careful about documentaries like " Sophie", like RTE fake news, they tend to be completely bias. Many people have told me it is a cover up, they know who did it but can't convict them. Remember, Ireland is a country with a lot of corruption. I am not mad about Bailey as a human being, but I do believe he is innocent.
@@patrickbruce187 Yea, I actually agree, there is more than enough of reasonable doubt in this case, and absence of physical evidence.. 😊 I just didn’t like the “linching” part of your comment 😊
@@Julia_F_i_r I understand Julia that you may not have liked the linching part but history has shown that this is exactly what happens if you start saying nonsense like, ' who else could have done it ", I think you should be more annoyed about that gross stupidity than my linching comment. I have lost count over the years of people wrongly convicted for not looking right or being different or locals saying, " Who else could it be",
Very Balanced Interview, I Have No Opinion As To Mr Baileys Innocence Or Guilt. Needless to say I Hope The Killer Of The Young Woman Is Identified. And If It’s Not Too Late. Brought To Justice… Question = Did Mr Bailey Take A Polygraph. 06.02.2024. Dublin.
Its a very odd story from start to finish.
Including the police handling and witnesses etc which is probably why he’s never been charged in Ireland.
It’s unlikely he’d get a fair trial anyway now.
But nothing forensic l believe and no reliable witnesses.
I can’t think why he’s stayed living there.
All very odd.
So we are into the first three minutes and all he has done has talked about himself and no mention of this poor girl tragedy. About six minutes he is pushing his book and a few of his poems dropped in. So he doesn’t mention her name and we are half way through we hear his experiences regarding his torture
So?
He had no reason to kill her, but her husband had when he found out she was cheating on him with Baiiley. Hit man sent over.
Why did you remove my comment ? Just because I said Ian bailey is guilty of the crime. The cops made a mess of it and bailey walks free . If you can break the jaw of your common law wife it's not much of a stretch.....
Domestic Violence does not mean you go on to murder. If you have evidence that he is guilty then present it to the Irish DPP who have see all the evidence and refused to charge him four times.
lol who are you judge and jury; you would make a very poor lawyer
@@random6809 exactly well said.
Abusing a partner (Jules was not his wife) is a very very far stretch from randomly murdering a woman who you didn't know, or very briefly knew (depending on who you believe).
Unfortunately domestic violence is not that uncommon in Ireland, it doesn't mean that those who commit it are murderers in the making.
@@jamesmy9221 the fact that something is 'not that uncommon' doesn''t somehow nullify it as scumbag behaviour, which it is
Guilty as hell
You have evidence that the experienced Barristers at the DPP have not seen? You know the DPP that refused to charge him, twice?
Guilty .
Feel free to state what evidence you have that the experienced Barristers at the DPP have not seen? He was not even charged, TWICE.
But hey, you know he is guilty, right?
There are videos about cats and dogs, videos of people fallng and other things that could be so funny, Im agree. That videos have millions visits, but when we have to be serious and talk with very important things and videos like this have only 22k visits I feel so sad. cause obviously we need to watch funny videos and we dont need to stay surrounded by crime and pain all days. But This cas in particular is not only a show, here we have a crime committed that have a lot of victims. The first onewas Sophie and we have other victim here, this man. Obviously the entire family of Sophie also. but in this case isnt involved only family, victim and acussed, other victim has been the justice and with it the enitire human sense of what must to be the real justice
Gloria a te Ian 🥂
Irelands oj Simpson
A hitman from France and the hoppy was part of thst
Bailey is innocent. This should be ipretty obvious.....
Malignant narcissist
If true, it does not mean murderer.
@@random6809 hi Ian, were you always this bad at poetry or did you have to work on it?
@@fantasyboxing71
Oh dear, found another silly comment from you about me being Bailey.
@@brianmcginley2743
Since Bailey is dead, I am clearly not Ian Bailey. Which proves that you are a lying, nasty, troll Brian McGinley.
@@random6809 hi Jules, how's things?
Ffs is he guilty or not
Not
@@patrickbruce187 I think I agree with you
If Bailey did it....he would never of told them that he got up to write in the studio on that night...only an innocent person would tell that truth.
@@freespeech4023 No he is innocent
not guilty
As my granny used to say guilty as sin
Your granny has access to evidence that the prosecutors who refused to charge him, TWICE, don't have?
@@random6809 her granny doesn't need evidence . Even though there is nothing to link Ian to the scene of the crime and even though the Gardai tried dirty tactics in order to get him convicted, that doesn't mean that he didn't do it. What i find missing when Ian is interviewed about the murder is the absence of anger. If i was accused of a crime like this one i would be mad as hell and everyone would know about it too. I probably wouldn't be though if i had done it.
@@malachy9400
Why do you believe that people should react how you think they should?
@@random6809 because a normal person wouln't like being accused of such a heinous crime.
@@malachy9400
How do you know he did or didn't like being accused?
You are missing the point. What makes *YOU* the judge on how people should react?
He didn't do it
yes you are right he didnt
The more I look at this case the more I agree. I see how little evidence they have and what they do is so weak.
Crap poetry 🤣
I quite like Ian. I’m interested in his work.
What?
Framed by the cops beacuse one of them killed her simple as
I think you're right... but who is this cop ....gate going missing is very sketchy
@@supernova101010 everyone down there no plenty about dirty cops and the woman lied about seeing him on the bridge that night cops are behind this end of🧤
How do you know that kojak
@@sallymolly67 oh I think he is right...
@@sallymolly67 everyone knows that Maria ur another one who's convinced Bailey did it yea jaysus
not guilty rest in paradise ian bailey
Not guilty , framed
INVISABLE WOMAN CRICKET COLUMBO PHYLLIS HIGGINS
Who are they covering for? If they framed Bailey
@@supernova101010 .... they don't need to be covering for anyone necessarily. The pressure on police to solve murders is always intense and can lead the cops to get tunnel vision about certain suspects, stop investigating others and then try to make the 'facts' fit their theory.
@@LouHillierPsych you're right
mommy issues
Maybe Sofia and her family can be at peace now,as the main suspect has died today!
I will say this ,I'm still after all I've watched and listened via podcasts still on the fence as to who killed Sofia 👀
Don’t be on a fence. He murdered her
@@mrsmacca126
Then send your evidence to the Barristers at the DPP who have looked at ALL the evidence and refused to charge him, twice.
You do have evidence for your allegation, yes? You obviously have something that the prosecutors don't, right?
Her name is Sophie, not Sofia, show some respect!
Stomach turning vanity and psicopathy .... Irish justice coundn't reallly be more mediocre !!!
Guilty guilty guilty
troll
Unless some hard physical evidence turns up we will never know if he is or not.
Fantasy Boxing : I’m not meaning to be a troll- I personally think there is a huge amount of circumstantial evidence. “ A bouquet of evidence” as the French would say!
@@katzolitamason6729
Evidence such as?
@@katzolitamason6729 he's definitely not a character that I'd trust and he seems to enjoy all of the attention that this situation has brought him, however I'm not convinced that he's a murderer and I feel that the guards have done everything in their power to botch the investigation, even managing to lose a 7 foot steel gate that had blood on it. Apparently a retired former guard was also a suspect but very little gets mentioned about this which seems suspicious. They really have tried to pin this on bailey but they've never come up with a shred of physical evidence. I'm not saying baileys innocent but I'm certainly not convinced of his guilt either.
If the Gardai didn’t botch up the investigation then…
They may have found the actual killer, not just went after the convenient local weirdo because Marie Farrel lied about seeing him.
@@brianmcginley2743
Since Bailey is dead, I am clearly not Ian Bailey. Which proves that you are a lying, nasty, troll Brian McGinley.
Certainly strange lack of contrition to the murder victim or himself
Long term substance abuse makes him the prime subject
If he lived amongst a large population for the same length of time
And having a short fuse he would be inside
An impulse killing was probably what happened knocking on the wrong door
And it being a woman would have been enough very sad for Sophie’s family
With a low density population overly gossiped has made it what it is
A result is likely despite the long and torturous journey
Misogynist
Now he’s convicted of murder in France, and has late stage cancer….. Jules has left him and he’s with a significantly younger woman. He and Jules need to be imprisoned, forever. Odious people
Get a grip.