@@jhg699 if it would be 2014 than i would have not been this excited as apple dominated back then. Now things are interesting and as you can see galaxy 24 ultra being 8 months old, tied the speed test with millisecond difference
I think we have reached a point where we almost always end up with a draw. However, there are rare occasions when one smartphone is significantly faster in certain situations.
Yeah in my opinion it depends on the app, snapseed is a Google app so it would make sense to be more optimised in android phones than in iOS , that’s why the galaxy is significantly faster
@@kongukaran well let me disagree cause snapseed is the same for all android phones since they all download it from Google Play Store , while they need to reprogram it for the iOS software since they have a tottaly different app architecture and system API’s and also different guidelines before being published in App Store . It’s propably written in a different programming language too like snapseed in android is probably written in Java while in iOS is written in Swift or Objective-C and to do that developers usually use cross-platform development frameworks like React Native or Flutter which usually result in a slower performance. I highly doubt that Google developers put the same effort to make snapseed fast on iOS . Just like macOS the Google chrome is veeery slow on simple tasks compared to safari , they are just not optimised
I'm a bit concerned about operating systems. For example, I'm still using Apple because I don't want to adapt to Android, but I must say that the battery life of the S24ultra seems incredible to me.
The battery is a differential, just like the fast charge, but the iPhone has its little something with the new camera button that really makes it easier to take photos.
True, although that made it a bit difficult for me to get a good case until I saw the Vionentus Elites, which are well adapted to the changes in iPhones.
@Akhan776_4 if ur used to ios there shouldn't be a reason to switch, the battery life is similar and even if the samsung has better battery life, it would be better by an hour max maybe the samsung is better in charging but tbh I think software is more important as the battery life is not that big of a difference, coming from a samsung user, I won't get an iPhone as I'm used to one ui
And update to ios 18.01 i came out last night and the geekbench scores were alot higher. The 16 pro did slower then 15 pm shows us it needed ios 18.01.
I’m more hyped for the battery test this year than the speed test lol. Speed is plenty fast already. Videos show how the 16 pro max is on a new level but I want to see if that’s true
True, actually this loading test already a joke for a couple of years.. i mean nobody close the messenger after he used it, and opening it 2 mins later (so the round 1 actually not even exists, almost everything is round 2.. and actually the 1-2 sec diff in a 2-3 mins duration is not even a huge difference just to make you consider to buy that model..)
@@fatehranks Not true, Not Even Samsung S23 Ultra Can Beat The 14 Pro Max And Not Even The Samsung S24 Ultra Can Beat The iPhone 15 Pro Max So The iPhone 16 Pro Max May Kill The Samsung S24 Ultra And Even The Oneplus 12😂😂😂😂
@@x3aga971well every single test besides that of MrWhoseTheBoss used a 10 months old S24U. This tells that either he did something wrong in the test, the battery degradation on the S24U is very bad or that the test included areas the S24U exceeds at.
First round: iPhone 16: 3 double swipes and S24U: 4 double swipes Second round: iPhone 16: 1 double swipe and S24U: 4 double swipes So if the S24U had the same double swipes as the iPhone it would win (u could even disable them completly on S24U)
But what’s up with the Disney animation playing faster on the S24U? Is that because Disney includes a shorter animation on Android or Samsung has system animations at 1.2x or something?
@B.D.F. usually animations are set higher to reduce perceived loading times. The time taken is same but the animations makes you feel that it is faster due to well there being an animstion
@@abdullahafzalkhan8414 But the time taken isn’t the same. If the iPhone has a 1-second loading animation and a 3-second Disney logo animation, but the S24U has a 0.5 second loading animation and a 1.5 second Disney logo animation that’s a 2-second animation loading lead the S24U gets over the iPhone, a measurable difference that isn’t necessarily related to loading the app.
@@d4mterro320 ? He literally states that the Samsung had more double swipe apps? At least in the second row. You can see it yourself. They’re both great, stop hating.
But the question us that, how often you close your messenger app for example completly when you switching apps..? Because if you are nit doing that, anything in the round 1 is actually a rare case, mist of the things are opened from memory, alias round 2 result is more accurate.. and that 1-2 extra double swipe won't cost you a total of 2 sec.. (because even iPhone is also required double swipe on apps, just on a bit less amount..)
@@d4mterro320 😂😂 You yourself are assuming it. I didn't say anything about which one better or not, I just mentioned the double swipe thing, it's my perception. Why are you so angry, iSheep ? 😂😂😂
Oh God, stop crying, fangirl! it's just a pointless test. Nobody uses their phone like that. In everyday usage, you won't notice any differences between them.
What iOS version though? 18.0.1 has a pretty big boost in performance for the 16 Pro’s. I’m on iOS 18.1 B5 and it’s fast AF. Geekbench even says so with a 3515/8774 score.
Geekbench isn't the true to life test, the real life test when you can really confirm the speeds of the phone was just provided in the video. Geekbench provides the superficial performance of a phone which includes the software optimizations too!
@@pacpep5086 A18 Pro does not need a test to prove it’s faster than last generation 4NM processors which snapdragon are using. 4NM design has peaked in performance and there isn’t much to squeeze out of it not without getting major issues. Apple is slowly creeping away. The 3NM processor design is what Samsung really need to keep on the heels of Apple with the iPhone but I don’t see that as a possibility not when Apple own and bought every 3NM chip out there. By the time Samsung get another major boost in performance, Apple will be using the 2NM processor design/chipset.
@@JesusChrist30000 you know that snapdragon 8 gen 4 is 3nm? and samsung is producing 3nm chips for 2 years, so the new samsung s25 will also the same process
If swiping is the cause of significant time differences then I would count that as margin of error. Day to day use is never consistent and as clearly shown each device has their own strengths and weaknesses. We are literally under 5 nm and having so much performance for just less than 20Wh of energy.
Behind the scenes, ex Apple engineers that gave Apple such the strong competition advantage wanted to make server chips, so created Nuvia because Apple did not want to work in that space. It turns out Nuvia was acquired by Snapdragon🤣. Apple still has some talent, but it’s going to be a fun next few years with competition. Right now the only big advantage of Apple is earlier access to TSMC’s smaller transistors.
The issue with a test like this is that it assumes the phones are opening the same app. They're not. Not even close. Speaking as a mobile engineer, when I worked at Chase, it was well known that the quality of engineering (particularly with performance) was far better from our iOS team than our Android team. That isn't to say this test isn't valuable, it's incredibly valuable and provides a ton of insight into the performance one can expect day to day with a given device; but it doesn't measure phone speed, it measures respective platform app speed, which is incredibly variable, based on how the devs of that platform handled things like image loading, caching, threading, memory management, etc.
As an iPhone user for years, the S24 is a freaking peace of hardware!!! I'm in love with it and I am waiting for the S25 to arrive to see what's next from Samsung!!!💪🏾
@@sanskarmohanty9939 s24u lost even against the 15 pro max. And now against the 16 pro max. Even tho apple did not fix performance before the ios 18.01 update that launched yesterday, a retest would make the differense even bigger
@@edk1124 that was mainly just some optimisation, if you watch that test, it kinda struggled with google trends which is where the 15 pro max made up a lot of ground and the double swipes in the second lap. I thought that was odd cuz of how big the gap was in the video render before. This time it loaded google trends way faster than it before.
I still consider the S24 Ultra won because S24 Ultra required double swap on some apps. Also, the iPhone 16 Pro Max has a faster CPU which should be significantly faster.
Samsung has optimized their smartphones more than iphones, let me explain , Samsung is using google's stock android for the main software foundation , and also they are using one ui on that stock android os and it is also well optimized powerful ui , even snapdragon latest chipset doesn't powerful as the latest bionic chipset , but the performance is supirior on samsung with these hard efforts , their ONE UI Is really incredible , Hats off for the Hard Works!🥺
@@SilencyGamer Android isn't made by Samsung. Apple makes both the phone and the OS. It will always be more optimized. This is why even with it's smaller battery it beat the s24 Ultra in Phonebuff's latest battery test.
@@JAYJAYBEBE Lol , Samsung's Display Resolution is much higher and better than apple and also the Refresh rate , and also brightness of the display is 2600 nits , Samsung is using adaptive refresh rate technology , and the chipset from qualcomm , they are totally fair with 5000mAh battery , and also phonebuff's never mentioned that they have used a brand new s24 ultra with new battery cycles , that's their wrong! s24 ultra came near one year ago after few months and 16 pro came couple months ago , so i don't believe that thing over than mrwhosethebosses comparisons. samsung is really the king of all rounder. even iphone isn't enough to beat with their own chipsets , os versus samsung's hard efforts , android is not their own os , and the chipsets also ,in this situation , their one ui performs so much greater and better optimized , no doubt about it!
Then imagine how the 17 pro max will perform😮 Bro if u want to compare samsung vs apple try to use the phones that are launched on the same year will ya?🤯🤡
Don’t forget, the galaxy s24 ultra had 7 months of time to optimize over the iPhone 16 pro max. Imagine how the galaxy s25 ultra will perform without those 7 months of optimization 🤓🤓🥶
Let's set the record straight. Comparing the Galaxy S24 Ultra and the iPhone 15 Pro Max makes sense because they were released just a few months apart, falling within the same tech cycle (2023-2024). Both represent the best technology their companies had to offer during that period. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max, released nearly 8 months after the S24 Ultra, features newer hardware and software, making it a different generation altogether. It’s not accurate to say the S24 Ultra had time to 'optimize' over the 16 Pro Max; they simply belong to different release windows. The fair comparison is clearly between the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Galaxy S24 Ultra, as they both reflect the cutting edge tech of their respective companies for the same timeframe. Looking ahead, comparisons with the iPhone 16 Pro Max should be reserved for future models like the Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Equally, because there isn't much room for improvement with the current state of technology. We will have to wait like 2 years for a significant improvement. I remember watching this 3-5 years ago, and watching these phones struggle to reload the apps, now it's near instantaneous. 3-5 years later, we will definitely see it becoming faster, but not in the short term. This is due to numerous reasons like Die sizes and optimizations etc.
@emiliapeabea except it needs it less seeing the s25 ultra is switching to custom oryon cores from qualcomm with massive performance increases vs iphone that only gets like +5% every year so the optimisation sometimes beats out the new chip in importance
@@luthfi1008thats the one he is talking about i guess. All tests show iphone winning with 1 - 2 hours and in hes test the samsung won by almost 1 hour😂 something was very wrong with that test.
@@Randomdude21-eIt's not fake. Mrwhosetheboss uses a new phone for every such test. 99% other youtubers use the same phones they got during the releases. It's only fair if two phones go head to head right out of the box.
Ya, because when we get the chip completely coincides with when it's developed right? lol Both chips were already ready at the same time, one just rolled out earlier than the other. The a18 is just as old as the latest snapdragon, it just didn't get released to the public till later.
@@JAYJAYBEBE Bro... Apple processors are way ahead in speed and technology since many years, i donno whether you know it or not. Now recently Qualcomm and mediatek started doing better in terms of performance, thermals and efficiency. But still Gaming and overall optimisation is still better with Apple and iOS
you should have tested after 18.0.1 its much faster. apple said there were some ram management problems and ios 18.0.1 is much faster. if you guys are hoping to see another speed test after 18.1 like this comment. cause its been 7 months galaxy has been optimizing.
I don't think anyone is claiming that the iPhone won't get better, considering he already said the 16PM did worse than the 15PM in one app. Anyway there will probably be another test once the S25 series comes out in a few months
@@nathanross4036 but then samsung will have to optimize and has to wait for patch updates. its always better to test after the 0.1 update on both phones
Woooow you are genius. How can u know this? Are you 16 pro max and now you are taking the skyrocket upgrade. Now you know that you have been scammed by Apple, but you can't admit it to yourself.
@@EmreKonyar I was android user for many years, and then I tried ios. And i realize how bad android is. I’m also linux user so its funny to hear about customization from windows sheep Os choose can’t be objective, people have different preferences, but u are android fanboy
I don’t understand the point of a “speed test” where preventable slow downs still exist, this is a real world speed test it should be the most raw a chip can handle apps and tasks, the “out of box experience” doesn’t matter in this case so you should’ve disabled the extra swipes to get out of apps.
To all complaining that PB needs to redo the test for iOS 18.1... it's not their responsibility to test with the "correct" software, it's on Apple to release the damn phone in a proper condition. They can afford to have these subpar phone launches because YOU keep buying them.
There will be some that think the iPhone being a fraction of a second faster in this first lap…in reality they are equal and that’s a good thing. These companies will only continue to compete.
The iPhone beat the Galaxy Ultra in the speed test and battery test. It's the best phone of 2024...results matter of feelings and emotions from Android fanboys
@@snappycd would say the same thing about double swiping on Samsung. It was Samsung's decision to require a double swipe, the test is done exactly how a regular user who just took it out of the box would. The test is still valid.
@@snappycd thats allways the case with new ios and launches. It takes a few weeks to optimize apps and chips. Update is already here and it did very well.
The iPhone with its new processor and new and the galaxy almost 1 year after being released is just as fast as the iPhone 16 Pro Max, hahaha I already want to see the new S25 Ultra in January.
My happiness is that, before the s25 ultra will come out, the iPhone must have also gone through a lot of software update, which will speed things up and still get the iPhone 16 pro max a win over the s25 ultra
😂 TBF android 15 is being released and Samsung will also released their new oneUI already based on android 15 so there's that too. I still think phone should be compared when their closest released to keep it "fair". So S24U Vs 15pm, S25U Vs 16pm and so on.
@@GabrielRM I’m still waiting on the day where a new device will be beaten by an old device just like we saw on this channel the iPhone 12 Pro max Vs the s21 ultra 2020-2021
It is necessary to take into account the fact on the galaxy you need to pull the bottom line up and then perform the home gesture, on the iPhone the home gesture is performed immediately so that both phones opened applications in the same time
We’ve basically reached the point where it’s simply a matter of which ecosystem you prefer, at least when it comes to the flag ships. The Galaxy 24S is a really good phone and the 16 Pro Max is a really good phone. Stop fighting about things that don’t matter and get whatever phone you want.
Suggestions: Categorize apps like the following 1. Day to day apps Video player, music player, youtube, browser speed, Excel sheets, mail, book reading app 2. Content creators apps Video editing apps etc 3. Gamers games //////// Also compare the smoothness and optimisation and give points based on that.
There is a setting in Samsung that enables a single swipe to exit full screen apps (just like on the iPhone). I think it should be enabled in those tests, to make it even.
@@fatehranks by 2 seconds, which is small enough of a gap to put it largely in margin of error. So they are about just as fast. But even winning a race by a sliver of an inch is still winning the race
the iphone had 3 double swipes and the Samsung had 4, at least for this video. Taking that in account, the s24 is probably .20-.50 milliseconds faster. You samsung fanboys always make this seem like there's a bigger gap than there actually is lmao
@@bubbleirin the first test, the difference was only about 0.1 seconds so yeah it would have changed the 'winner'. And for the second test the galaxy obviously had more double swipes that made the galaxy take a few more seconds because both of the phones did not experience any refresh yet the gap widened.
@@bubbleirso, the nearly one year old S24U would still beat the brand new iPhone flagship? And Android 15 coming out, S25U around the corner and the gen4 Qualcomm rumoured faster than a18 chip? Oh boi, these apple fanbois are something else
@@Randomdude21-e try reading the thread before replying 💀 the guy is saying Samsung would've won marginally if it wasn't for the extra swipe the galaxy needs, you special twinkle
They always test with standard settings; otherwise, you could overclock and other stuff. It is about optimisations, and Samsung should get rid of double-swipe, but I suspect they don't due to too many people, when playing games, swiping out of the game with one swipe enabled.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Finally the moment have come we all have been waiting for... I got my popcorn ready too
It's not 2014...
@@jhg699 let him be happy dude
iSwear
I'm waiting for the battery test.
@@jhg699 if it would be 2014 than i would have not been this excited as apple dominated back then. Now things are interesting and as you can see galaxy 24 ultra being 8 months old, tied the speed test with millisecond difference
I think we have reached a point where we almost always end up with a draw. However, there are rare occasions when one smartphone is significantly faster in certain situations.
Yeah in my opinion it depends on the app, snapseed is a Google app so it would make sense to be more optimised in android phones than in iOS , that’s why the galaxy is significantly faster
That certain situation is when you compare any flagship phone to pixel.
I miss the days of the A14 (i12) and A15 (i13). These chips were killing the industry. But since then it feels like apple stopped trying
@@kongukaran well let me disagree cause snapseed is the same for all android phones since they all download it from Google Play Store , while they need to reprogram it for the iOS software since they have a tottaly different app architecture and system API’s and also different guidelines before being published in App Store . It’s propably written in a different programming language too like snapseed in android is probably written in Java while in iOS is written in Swift or Objective-C and to do that developers usually use cross-platform development frameworks like React Native or Flutter which usually result in a slower performance. I highly doubt that Google developers put the same effort to make snapseed fast on iOS . Just like macOS the Google chrome is veeery slow on simple tasks compared to safari , they are just not optimised
But why?
Now onto the battery test.
Which samsung will win, again.
@@richieb1990 heck no
@@richieb1990 s24 ultra lost to the 15 pro max
@@richieb1990galaxy allways loose batterytests against iphones
iPhone will gonna win
Because it's compettor is S25 Ultra not S24 Ultra
This shows that both phones are pretty good and super powerful.
I'm a bit concerned about operating systems. For example, I'm still using Apple because I don't want to adapt to Android, but I must say that the battery life of the S24ultra seems incredible to me.
The battery is a differential, just like the fast charge, but the iPhone has its little something with the new camera button that really makes it easier to take photos.
True, although that made it a bit difficult for me to get a good case until I saw the Vionentus Elites, which are well adapted to the changes in iPhones.
@Akhan776_4 if ur used to ios there shouldn't be a reason to switch, the battery life is similar and even if the samsung has better battery life, it would be better by an hour max maybe the samsung is better in charging but tbh I think software is more important as the battery life is not that big of a difference, coming from a samsung user, I won't get an iPhone as I'm used to one ui
Naah the the s25 will dominate iphone 16promax
You can disable the double swipe on games on the Galaxy, then it would be much faster
And update to ios 18.01 i came out last night and the geekbench scores were alot higher. The 16 pro did slower then 15 pm shows us it needed ios 18.01.
You can also just swipe left on the iPhone homebar to go through opened apps, which would make it unbeatable in the second part.
@12Nervu you can do the same on the Galaxy too
@@12Nervu omg I just learned this
You can do that on the Samsung too. But that's not the point here. @@12Nervu
Literally just milliseconds of difference between the 2. Thats crazy
Nope quite a few seconds for the samsung, apple is trash
Yeah, just a few thousand
and with one phone being a generation older and about to be replaced.
@@DennisGr and then there’ll be the iPhone 17. It’s gonna be a never ending tug of war.
@@DerangedScout galaxy s24 is 10 months old at this point. it's obviously closer to the release of iphone 15 than 16, galaxy s25 will come soon.
bro killed it on that intro
I’m more hyped for the battery test this year than the speed test lol. Speed is plenty fast already. Videos show how the 16 pro max is on a new level but I want to see if that’s true
S24 ultra battery is better
@@fatehranksno is not. Every single test on the internet except mrwhosetheboss shows that iPhone has a better battery
True, actually this loading test already a joke for a couple of years.. i mean nobody close the messenger after he used it, and opening it 2 mins later (so the round 1 actually not even exists, almost everything is round 2.. and actually the 1-2 sec diff in a 2-3 mins duration is not even a huge difference just to make you consider to buy that model..)
@@fatehranks Not true, Not Even Samsung S23 Ultra Can Beat The 14 Pro Max And Not Even The Samsung S24 Ultra Can Beat The iPhone 15 Pro Max So The iPhone 16 Pro Max May Kill The Samsung S24 Ultra And Even The Oneplus 12😂😂😂😂
@@x3aga971well every single test besides that of MrWhoseTheBoss used a 10 months old S24U. This tells that either he did something wrong in the test, the battery degradation on the S24U is very bad or that the test included areas the S24U exceeds at.
The Galaxy S25 with Snap Gen 4 is around the corner. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
And 16 gigs of ram 💀
@@usmanjs7621and a kid with 100$ xiaomi in the comments💀
iPhone 17 is around the corner 😂😂
It will lose to the iPhone 16 Pro with the latest iOS 18 update.
@@lp4342Galaxy S26 Ultra around the corner 🤣
The Real speed test
The fact that Samsung needs to double swipe to exit an app and still neck to neck with the iPhone is insane
@@NoName-jh3th same on iPhone lol are you blind?!
@cia4gent128 there are much more apps on galaxy that requires this than the iphone
@@cia4gent128 iphone requires much less double swipe than galaxy
@@cia4gent128in second row there's no need to double swipe on the iPhone
@@razvanendl9900 apps like?? Normal apps require one swipe to exit…and games require 2 swipes! It’s the same on iPhone and android.
First round: iPhone 16: 3 double swipes and S24U: 4 double swipes
Second round: iPhone 16: 1 double swipe and S24U: 4 double swipes
So if the S24U had the same double swipes as the iPhone it would win (u could even disable them completly on S24U)
But what’s up with the Disney animation playing faster on the S24U? Is that because Disney includes a shorter animation on Android or Samsung has system animations at 1.2x or something?
@B.D.F. usually animations are set higher to reduce perceived loading times. The time taken is same but the animations makes you feel that it is faster due to well there being an animstion
@@abdullahafzalkhan8414 But the time taken isn’t the same. If the iPhone has a 1-second loading animation and a 3-second Disney logo animation, but the S24U has a 0.5 second loading animation and a 1.5 second Disney logo animation that’s a 2-second animation loading lead the S24U gets over the iPhone, a measurable difference that isn’t necessarily related to loading the app.
dont use snapseed and there is no contest. but who cares. both are mega fast.
You guys are literally debating which phones swipes more... speed test does not matter anyways
Double swipe does matter in speed test.
Iphone also had to do double swipe a couple times. Stop spamming comments without watching the video .Samsung is the INFERIOR phone
@@d4mterro320 ? He literally states that the Samsung had more double swipe apps? At least in the second row. You can see it yourself. They’re both great, stop hating.
@@d4mterro320 Samsung had to double swipe way more than the iPhone did.
But the question us that, how often you close your messenger app for example completly when you switching apps..? Because if you are nit doing that, anything in the round 1 is actually a rare case, mist of the things are opened from memory, alias round 2 result is more accurate.. and that 1-2 extra double swipe won't cost you a total of 2 sec.. (because even iPhone is also required double swipe on apps, just on a bit less amount..)
@@d4mterro320 😂😂 You yourself are assuming it. I didn't say anything about which one better or not, I just mentioned the double swipe thing, it's my perception. Why are you so angry, iSheep ? 😂😂😂
2:46 what was that? Don't you think those seconds would make a difference to redo this trial?
yeah @phonebuff what's going on
What's wrong??? I don't see it?
Oh God, stop crying, fangirl! it's just a pointless test. Nobody uses their phone like that. In everyday usage, you won't notice any differences between them.
Both phones did that
Now, the speed test turns down to app developers' optimization test.😂
Would like to see this same test done again after a few more IOS 18 upgrades just to see what difference the software can make.
Ios 18.01 shows huge gains in geekbench actually
@@Randomdude21-estill my iPad m4 has a 1k less multicore on Geekbench with 18.01 than it did with 17.6.1😪
What iOS version though? 18.0.1 has a pretty big boost in performance for the 16 Pro’s.
I’m on iOS 18.1 B5 and it’s fast AF. Geekbench even says so with a 3515/8774 score.
Geekbench isn't the true to life test, the real life test when you can really confirm the speeds of the phone was just provided in the video. Geekbench provides the superficial performance of a phone which includes the software optimizations too!
@@pacpep5086 it’s not but it’s just another way to show there’s been performance improvements
@@pacpep5086 A18 Pro does not need a test to prove it’s faster than last generation 4NM processors which snapdragon are using.
4NM design has peaked in performance and there isn’t much to squeeze out of it not without getting major issues.
Apple is slowly creeping away. The 3NM processor design is what Samsung really need to keep on the heels of Apple with the iPhone but I don’t see that as a possibility not when Apple own and bought every 3NM chip out there.
By the time Samsung get another major boost in performance, Apple will be using the 2NM processor design/chipset.
@@JesusChrist30000 you know that snapdragon 8 gen 4 is 3nm? and samsung is producing 3nm chips for 2 years, so the new samsung s25 will also the same process
Now waiting for the 16 Pro Max vs s25 Ultra Phonebuff speed test 🔥🔥🔥
At this point whole youtube community was waiting for this and battery test which is yet to come
Samsung would've been faster if it didn't do those double swipes
If swiping is the cause of significant time differences then I would count that as margin of error. Day to day use is never consistent and as clearly shown each device has their own strengths and weaknesses. We are literally under 5 nm and having so much performance for just less than 20Wh of energy.
Oh boohoo, it didn’t, get over it Samsung fanboy 😂
OMG! I was expecting the S24 Ultra to slip but I am so impressed how it kept up with the performance for 1 year. Biggest thumbs up to Samsung. SALUTE!
Samsung Fanboy.
@@Agaubruder59 its funny he called it a draw but iPhone did 2 seconds faster, if the galaxy won by 2 second he would call it a win
@@antiplayer7759I think it's because of the double swipe thing
@@agastinmathew1630 that wouldn't matter because iPhones have smoother animations that take longer so you gotta take that into account
@@Agaubruder59 and?
A tieeee😂 dang. Ngl bith companies have come a long way and lowkey the closest that its ever been.
Behind the scenes, ex Apple engineers that gave Apple such the strong competition advantage wanted to make server chips, so created Nuvia because Apple did not want to work in that space.
It turns out Nuvia was acquired by Snapdragon🤣. Apple still has some talent, but it’s going to be a fun next few years with competition. Right now the only big advantage of Apple is earlier access to TSMC’s smaller transistors.
A nearly year old phone still holding strong in the highest end is impressive
The issue with a test like this is that it assumes the phones are opening the same app.
They're not. Not even close. Speaking as a mobile engineer, when I worked at Chase, it was well known that the quality of engineering (particularly with performance) was far better from our iOS team than our Android team.
That isn't to say this test isn't valuable, it's incredibly valuable and provides a ton of insight into the performance one can expect day to day with a given device; but it doesn't measure phone speed, it measures respective platform app speed, which is incredibly variable, based on how the devs of that platform handled things like image loading, caching, threading, memory management, etc.
This year Galaxy is a killer phone. Excited for 25 Ultra.
Ios 18.01 did 10% higher in geekbench. The iphone 16 pm on ios 18 was not well optimized.
These RUclips guys always discrediting iPhones indirectly,
The fact that Samsung’s geek bench is 7000, and apple is 8000, makes this even more impressive. Well done Samsung.
I've been waiting for this video since the iPhone 16 Pro Max came out. Brilliant intro. Great work David. Keep it up. This video is on fire.
4nm chip can match the performance of 3nm one. Excellent Samsung.
Excellent Qualcomm
In my opinion both made a good job, and it's an excellent cooperation. Two parts working in perfect harmony.
Cudos Qualcomm made for Galaxy!!!
Kolkom
@@GGGrandMasterit's also about software.
Bro..qualcomm is nothing without a very optimized os..Samsung has done it very much..
DISABLE THE DOUBLE SWOIPE ON THE GALAXY AND IT WILL WIN,
As an iPhone user for years, the S24 is a freaking peace of hardware!!! I'm in love with it and I am waiting for the S25 to arrive to see what's next from Samsung!!!💪🏾
It will loose against 16 pm same as every year
@@Randomdude21-e I saw a draw here, so it will be better!!! Don't be a fan boy and just appreciate what others do better!!!
@@Randomdude21-e did it loose though ?
grainy screen tho
@@sanskarmohanty9939 s24u lost even against the 15 pro max.
And now against the 16 pro max. Even tho apple did not fix performance before the ios 18.01 update that launched yesterday, a retest would make the differense even bigger
Your battery comparison videos are always helpful as they are similar to my battery usage patterns. I look forward to your tests.
the fact that a flagship released in the beginning of the year has tied with the A18 pro is actually insane.
and after samsung did some optimizing
Well, the S24 Ultra lost against the 15 pro max in the speed test a few months ago, although it was only 3 seconds behind.
@@edk1124 that was mainly just some optimisation, if you watch that test, it kinda struggled with google trends which is where the 15 pro max made up a lot of ground and the double swipes in the second lap. I thought that was odd cuz of how big the gap was in the video render before. This time it loaded google trends way faster than it before.
@@sidthiru1509thats the same with iphone now, ios18.01 came out last night and boost performance alot.
Finally...... Most awaited video 😮
I still consider the S24 Ultra won because S24 Ultra required double swap on some apps. Also, the iPhone 16 Pro Max has a faster CPU which should be significantly faster.
No , it's was only due to snapseed was not optimised for iphone .
iPhone 16 also has to double swipe in some apps.
@@behehsvdiiw73yh but Samsung had to double swipe on all the games tested
Apple also just released iOS 8.0.1 which fixed a RAM issue so it could actually be even faster now
@@spugattihey what about the application is not optimized for s24
These speed tests are more interesting to me than any actual sport
Been watching since 2014 and they're always so intense
I think the double swipes on Samsung should be calculated out of the final results
3:41 in here 16 pro max home bar didn’t disappeared like S24U. If it’s hidden like S24U it’s also need to drag two times. Agree with me?
They think you can't go home if u swipe it once on the Galaxy in games, but you can easily do that in settings, so
Yesterday's technology at tomorrow's price
Can't wait for the battery test!!!!
Awesome Intro!
We’ve been waiting for the battery test for ages where is it ?
Samsung has optimized their smartphones more than iphones, let me explain , Samsung is using google's stock android for the main software foundation , and also they are using one ui on that stock android os and it is also well optimized powerful ui , even snapdragon latest chipset doesn't powerful as the latest bionic chipset , but the performance is supirior on samsung with these hard efforts , their ONE UI Is really incredible , Hats off for the Hard Works!🥺
None of that proves better optimization lol
@@JAYJAYBEBE why not ? just open your eyes lol..
@@SilencyGamer
Your argument was a non-sequitor.
@@SilencyGamer Android isn't made by Samsung.
Apple makes both the phone and the OS.
It will always be more optimized.
This is why even with it's smaller battery it beat the s24 Ultra in Phonebuff's latest battery test.
@@JAYJAYBEBE Lol , Samsung's Display Resolution is much higher and better than apple and also the Refresh rate , and also brightness of the display is 2600 nits , Samsung is using adaptive refresh rate technology , and the chipset from qualcomm , they are totally fair with 5000mAh battery , and also phonebuff's never mentioned that they have used a brand new s24 ultra with new battery cycles , that's their wrong! s24 ultra came near one year ago after few months and 16 pro came couple months ago , so i don't believe that thing over than mrwhosethebosses comparisons. samsung is really the king of all rounder. even iphone isn't enough to beat with their own chipsets , os versus samsung's hard efforts , android is not their own os , and the chipsets also ,in this situation , their one ui performs so much greater and better optimized , no doubt about it!
I was just about to watch it, but then i remembered i have a life to live.
Don't forget, the Galaxy S24 Ultra is 7 months older than the iPhone 16 Pro Max. Imagine how the Galaxy S25 Ultra will perform.
Then imagine how the 17 pro max will perform😮
Bro if u want to compare samsung vs apple try to use the phones that are launched on the same year will ya?🤯🤡
Don’t forget, the galaxy s24 ultra had 7 months of time to optimize over the iPhone 16 pro max. Imagine how the galaxy s25 ultra will perform without those 7 months of optimization 🤓🤓🥶
Let's set the record straight. Comparing the Galaxy S24 Ultra and the iPhone 15 Pro Max makes sense because they were released just a few months apart, falling within the same tech cycle (2023-2024). Both represent the best technology their companies had to offer during that period.
On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max, released nearly 8 months after the S24 Ultra, features newer hardware and software, making it a different generation altogether. It’s not accurate to say the S24 Ultra had time to 'optimize' over the 16 Pro Max; they simply belong to different release windows.
The fair comparison is clearly between the iPhone 15 Pro Max and the Galaxy S24 Ultra, as they both reflect the cutting edge tech of their respective companies for the same timeframe. Looking ahead, comparisons with the iPhone 16 Pro Max should be reserved for future models like the Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Equally, because there isn't much room for improvement with the current state of technology.
We will have to wait like 2 years for a significant improvement.
I remember watching this 3-5 years ago, and watching these phones struggle to reload the apps, now it's near instantaneous.
3-5 years later, we will definitely see it becoming faster, but not in the short term. This is due to numerous reasons like Die sizes and optimizations etc.
@emiliapeabea except it needs it less seeing the s25 ultra is switching to custom oryon cores from qualcomm with massive performance increases vs iphone that only gets like +5% every year so the optimisation sometimes beats out the new chip in importance
Been patiently waiting for this beautiful creation.
Battery test please :)
We need a real battery test, unlike most of the fake ones on other YT channels.
Have you seen mrwhosetheboss test?
Thats controlled test, you can see lover of tech's real life test where iphone crushed samsung@@luthfi1008
@@luthfi1008thats the one he is talking about i guess. All tests show iphone winning with 1 - 2 hours and in hes test the samsung won by almost 1 hour😂 something was very wrong with that test.
@@luthfi1008 yepp, thats the fake one he talking about :D
@@Randomdude21-eIt's not fake. Mrwhosetheboss uses a new phone for every such test. 99% other youtubers use the same phones they got during the releases.
It's only fair if two phones go head to head right out of the box.
Great video. Was waiting for this one. Next up. Battery test
Damn it's really cool to see Samsung even with an year old chip- competes neck to neck with A18 pro chip of apple 🔥🔥
Ya, because when we get the chip completely coincides with when it's developed right? lol Both chips were already ready at the same time, one just rolled out earlier than the other. The a18 is just as old as the latest snapdragon, it just didn't get released to the public till later.
@@JAYJAYBEBE Bro... Apple processors are way ahead in speed and technology since many years, i donno whether you know it or not. Now recently Qualcomm and mediatek started doing better in terms of performance, thermals and efficiency. But still Gaming and overall optimisation is still better with Apple and iOS
This has always been the best way to test the speed of new phones. Keep it up
you should have tested after 18.0.1 its much faster. apple said there were some ram management problems and ios 18.0.1 is much faster. if you guys are hoping to see another speed test after 18.1 like this comment. cause its been 7 months galaxy has been optimizing.
I don't think anyone is claiming that the iPhone won't get better, considering he already said the 16PM did worse than the 15PM in one app. Anyway there will probably be another test once the S25 series comes out in a few months
@@nathanross4036 but then samsung will have to optimize and has to wait for patch updates. its always better to test after the 0.1 update on both phones
🤣🤣
Apple fanboys are heartbroken
@@anand.chaudhari Oh that the unoptimized 16PM tied with your flagship that has been optimized for months already?
If you have a galaxy you can set it to have only 1 swipe in any app in any orientation to go home with goodlock.
The speed test is now more of a whether the phone is optimized.
As expected, these tests are negligibly close now, pick whichever software features you like more essentially.
With IOS 18.0.1 AND EVEN THE 18.1 THE Perfromance of the 16 pro max skyrocheting, maybe with ios 18.1 is necessary to re-do a test
Woooow you are genius. How can u know this? Are you 16 pro max and now you are taking the skyrocket upgrade. Now you know that you have been scammed by Apple, but you can't admit it to yourself.
Omagaad skyrockettt 😆😆😆
@@EmreKonyar Normal users doesnt care, they just don't want to use phone with awful design and android aka trash os
@@artur9782 you know nothing and just fan of one brand. Android is like a lego. So dont write if you can not be objective
@@EmreKonyar I was android user for many years, and then I tried ios. And i realize how bad android is. I’m also linux user so its funny to hear about customization from windows sheep
Os choose can’t be objective, people have different preferences, but u are android fanboy
I don’t understand the point of a “speed test” where preventable slow downs still exist, this is a real world speed test it should be the most raw a chip can handle apps and tasks, the “out of box experience” doesn’t matter in this case so you should’ve disabled the extra swipes to get out of apps.
To all complaining that PB needs to redo the test for iOS 18.1... it's not their responsibility to test with the "correct" software, it's on Apple to release the damn phone in a proper condition. They can afford to have these subpar phone launches because YOU keep buying them.
we have been waiting man
Next time you can use goodlock on the samsung. So that a double swipe is not needed
There will be some that think the iPhone being a fraction of a second faster in this first lap…in reality they are equal and that’s a good thing. These companies will only continue to compete.
The iPhone beat the Galaxy Ultra in the speed test and battery test. It's the best phone of 2024...results matter of feelings and emotions from Android fanboys
@@lamar310 I use an iPhone, but it doesn’t matter. It’s a tiny computer and a phone. “Fanboys”. WTf is that anyway? Who cares?
Geekbench scores on ios 18.01 is 3600 and 9073
Thats alot higher then on 18.0.
Guess that’s iPhones fault for not optimising it sooner. Scores could go up when one ui 7 drops for Samsung doesn’t mean the test is invalid
@@snappycd would say the same thing about double swiping on Samsung. It was Samsung's decision to require a double swipe, the test is done exactly how a regular user who just took it out of the box would. The test is still valid.
@@snappycd??? What kinda shitty logic is that lmfao then the test should’ve used the base Samsung OS when s24u launched ?
@@snappycd thats allways the case with new ios and launches. It takes a few weeks to optimize apps and chips. Update is already here and it did very well.
@@emiliapeabeaIt means the tests should be done regularly as the software gets updated.
That iPhone comeback was absolutely unreal 😱😱😱🔥
The iPhone with its new processor and new and the galaxy almost 1 year after being released is just as fast as the iPhone 16 Pro Max, hahaha I already want to see the new S25 Ultra in January.
Iphone 16 pm will still beat the s25u by alot.
@@Randomdude21-eit didn't even beat the 24 ultra thats almost a year old 💀
@@louismoses5937 did you watch this test? S24u have not won against iphone 15 pm or 16 pm and s25u will loose too them also
Well very good performance from s24 ultra, can’t wait for s25 ultra with 8gen4 & 16 gb ram
My happiness is that, before the s25 ultra will come out, the iPhone must have also gone through a lot of software update, which will speed things up and still get the iPhone 16 pro max a win over the s25 ultra
😂 TBF android 15 is being released and Samsung will also released their new oneUI already based on android 15 so there's that too.
I still think phone should be compared when their closest released to keep it "fair". So S24U Vs 15pm, S25U Vs 16pm and so on.
@@GabrielRM I’m still waiting on the day where a new device will be beaten by an old device just like we saw on this channel the iPhone 12 Pro max Vs the s21 ultra
2020-2021
@@MGVTPRO well, the 15pm did beat the s24 ultra
@@shreyass2447 ohh yeah
That’s true, but mehhh did you watch the iPhone 12 Pro Max race?
I need something like that again
@@shreyass2447 barely and a 3 sec difference ain't that big accounting for the double swipes. I'd say its more a like a sec and a half difference
It is necessary to take into account the fact on the galaxy you need to pull the bottom line up and then perform the home gesture, on the iPhone the home gesture is performed immediately so that both phones opened applications in the same time
iOS 18.0.1?
Should have been. But its not. It had performance gains over ios 18.0.
We’ve basically reached the point where it’s simply a matter of which ecosystem you prefer, at least when it comes to the flag ships. The Galaxy 24S is a really good phone and the 16 Pro Max is a really good phone. Stop fighting about things that don’t matter and get whatever phone you want.
I don t regret switching from 15 pro to s24 ultra. Samsung is just easy to use and better overall
How's the size and the weight for you? Because my wrist got sore after gaming on it for half an hour.
@@renofumi28 i have big hands, it s very ok for me and in gaming i like the way you hold it
Iphone is better for gaming
Not here to judge but isn’t buying another phone when your previous one is only a few months old a waste of money?
@@Zomboy4313 Oh no, did he use your money?
Now this is a historical event in technology industry.
Damn that was pretty intense!
This is why I use navigation buttons on galaxy. Not swipe from the bottom up. More accurate and faster
am i the only one who still feels that S24U is more luxurious ?! 🤔
Suggestions:
Categorize apps like the following
1. Day to day apps
Video player, music player, youtube, browser speed, Excel sheets, mail, book reading app
2. Content creators apps
Video editing apps etc
3. Gamers games
////////
Also compare the smoothness and optimisation and give points based on that.
Bro iOS 18.0.1 just dropped last night and it brings a lot of improvements.
There is a setting in Samsung that enables a single swipe to exit full screen apps (just like on the iPhone).
I think it should be enabled in those tests, to make it even.
The IPhone needs optimization 😂😂
Been waiting
“It don't matter if you win by an inch or a mile. Winning's winning.”
S25 ultra will beat thr iphone 16 with sd 8 gen 4
@@fatehranks This video is not testing the S25U. It's testing the S24U. And iPhone wins against S24U.
@@tdrg_ it didnt win though did it.
@@fatehranks by 2 seconds, which is small enough of a gap to put it largely in margin of error. So they are about just as fast. But even winning a race by a sliver of an inch is still winning the race
@@fatehranks and the A19 Pro in the iPhone 17 will beat the S25 ultra. Why’re you talking about things that don’t even exist?
Wow that was crazy just WOW 😮
AMAZING performance from the galaxy btw
Turn off the double swipe to go home on the Samsung so it's more fair
Iphone did double swipe some that samsung didnt
I will say the Dynamic Island showing the time elapsing on the iPhone was pretty interesting
We want battery
Last year’s 15pm vs s24 was a bigger difference for iphone, what is apple doing? Going backwards?
test battery ip16 PM & S24 Ultra
I was waiting for the classic random phone buff "stutter in 1 app allowing the iphone to catch up" on the samsung
Never clicked so fast😂
Haha apple new 3 nanometer iPhone couldn't win😂😂
ios 18.0.1?
No unfortunatly
@@Randomdude21-e they fix performance on ios 18.0.1
Please redo the battery & speed tests with the iPhone being on 18.0.1.
Just a solid proof that apple's overexaggerated claims about their chipsets doesn't translate to real world test
Unless into gaming, the iPhone hammers thw Samsung
@@tawsiaislam2855 The Qualcomm chip gpu is netter than iphone gpu , sp ots just optimisation .
You changed the video export task compared to the last test, which explains the different results.
The Galaxy has an obvious disadvantage because you have to swipe twice to exit games while on the iPhone you only have to swipe once.
the iphone had 3 double swipes and the Samsung had 4, at least for this video. Taking that in account, the s24 is probably .20-.50 milliseconds faster. You samsung fanboys always make this seem like there's a bigger gap than there actually is lmao
@@bubbleirin the first test, the difference was only about 0.1 seconds so yeah it would have changed the 'winner'. And for the second test the galaxy obviously had more double swipes that made the galaxy take a few more seconds because both of the phones did not experience any refresh yet the gap widened.
@@bubbleirso, the nearly one year old S24U would still beat the brand new iPhone flagship? And Android 15 coming out, S25U around the corner and the gen4 Qualcomm rumoured faster than a18 chip? Oh boi, these apple fanbois are something else
@@GabrielRMiphone won and will win against the s25u no doubt about it.
@@Randomdude21-e try reading the thread before replying 💀 the guy is saying Samsung would've won marginally if it wasn't for the extra swipe the galaxy needs, you special twinkle
This goes to show that you can get either of these two and enjoy a fluid experience, you don't need to choose one over another for speed.
i just love the galaxy 😍
Finally. It’s time 🤺
Why you not changing with “good luck”
to- once swipe out.. on the Samsung S24 ultra, to make it more of a comparison!??
I suggested that once
It's actually "Good Lock"
They always test with standard settings; otherwise, you could overclock and other stuff. It is about optimisations, and Samsung should get rid of double-swipe, but I suspect they don't due to too many people, when playing games, swiping out of the game with one swipe enabled.
@@andyH_England yea that was what i thought then never asked again
👍👍video, Would be interesting to see these devices go head to head again in 1 yr 2yrs & 3yrs after daily use to see how they hold up in long term test
You have not updated the iOS 18.0.1 system, which they have improved the performance and s24ultra for many months and it is receiving system updates
Your phone tests are the most accurate and fair on the internet no cap 🧢