If they didn't, banks wouldn't look at your credit score before lending you money. If they didn't, insurance companies wouldn't base your rates on the cleanliness of your driving record.
Growing up Catholic, 20 years ago, I was being told how a higher body count led to marital problems, and since then, more and more data has come up affirming that.
You are talking about some 20 to 30% of top attractive men and women. And it is not about how many partners they had. It is about that they are grouping with other attractive men and women and they exchange tons of offers on a daily basis. And amongst those offers from time to time there is one they simply can not resist. Attraction, s_x, excitement, passion that each new relation brings are most powerful drives in the human psychology and biology. The other factor is their entitlement - feeling that they deserve the best and their ability to afford the best. Which creates a big time spoil in their expectations. So when the passions are over then they quit at the first sign of imperfection in their partner. Always jumping to the next and the next.
Not to say I disagree with the point you made, but the 230% sounds stupid and totally nullifies your argument. Statistic percentages only work from a range of 0-100%, there's no such thing as a statistic that could push 230%
Percentages over 100% are used all the time to represent increases beyond the baseline. if something grows by 230%, it’s 2.3 times its original size. This isn’t 'nullifying'; it’s basic math. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t mean it’s invalid.
@@MedicalNemesis You’re right about the final size being 3.3 times the original. To clarify, a 230% increase means you add 2.3x the original to the original itself. Final size = 1 (original) + 2.3 (increase) = 3.3 times the original 👍
Do past choices define your future relationships?
Yes.
1000% without a doubt
If they didn't, banks wouldn't look at your credit score before lending you money. If they didn't, insurance companies wouldn't base your rates on the cleanliness of your driving record.
high BC = there is not chance for a "future relationship" with that person
Body count may seem irrelevant to some, but past experiences can shape behaviors and expectations in relationships.
Growing up Catholic, 20 years ago, I was being told how a higher body count led to marital problems, and since then, more and more data has come up affirming that.
Exception: women who revert to Islam and abide by the physical and psychological modesty of it.
Which podcast was this from? Who is the guy talking? Thank you.
You are talking about some 20 to 30% of top attractive men and women.
And it is not about how many partners they had. It is about that they are grouping with other attractive men and women and they exchange tons of offers on a daily basis. And amongst those offers from time to time there is one they simply can not resist.
Attraction, s_x, excitement, passion that each new relation brings are most powerful drives in the human psychology and biology.
The other factor is their entitlement - feeling that they deserve the best and their ability to afford the best. Which creates a big time spoil in their expectations. So when the passions are over then they quit at the first sign of imperfection in their partner. Always jumping to the next and the next.
No this is a game of averages, this is not about exceptions.
Not to say I disagree with the point you made, but the 230% sounds stupid and totally nullifies your argument. Statistic percentages only work from a range of 0-100%, there's no such thing as a statistic that could push 230%
Percentages over 100% are used all the time to represent increases beyond the baseline. if something grows by 230%, it’s 2.3 times its original size. This isn’t 'nullifying'; it’s basic math. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t mean it’s invalid.
Was about to say the same thing. Great clarification.
@@BreakupBounceIt's actually 3.3 times more, a 100% growth means a doubling of the size.
@@MedicalNemesis You’re right about the final size being 3.3 times the original. To clarify, a 230% increase means you add 2.3x the original to the original itself. Final size = 1 (original) + 2.3 (increase) = 3.3 times the original 👍
Correlation =/= Causation. Whatever the truth of the matter is this guy's argument is trash.
Coping hard
The fact ur disagreeing with not being able to change a ho is crazy