@@AFGuidesHD Hey, CNN said it not me. I guess when they aren’t being sexual deviants with children (look it up) they apparently are harder on Biden than Trump.
When the so called bad guy basically says exactly all the things that were thinking yes he's a bad guy but he's right people don't want f****** freedom they want rules order they want to protection they are like children humans are like children they need protection not just from others but from themselves you look on the TV and you see if you arguing over not getting a f****** shot or people arguing over which f****** book is the best give me a break
@@Hawaiian_Pizza_Enjoyer Well, within the context of the game's story, he's a villain. He has prior knowledge of a terrorist attack that plans to cause a nuclear meltdown at a power plant but he lets it happen so he can make money and influence off of intervening, and there basically ends up being a small scale chernobyl. He also blows up the Golden Gate bridge while there's tons of civilians on it. He might say a lot of things that make sense, but that doesn't really justify his actions if you ask me.
In part yes, he's wrong about democracy being a bad thing, but he isn't wrong when he says the US has a horrendous track record of actually successfully setting up other democracies besides there own.
You know, this scene can relate with another cod villain's speech, Gen. Shepherd "We can't give you freedom, but we can give you the know how to acquire it."
Jingoistic and realistic are two different things. Shepard gave nothing but war. He didn’t want to give tools, he wanted to save face and be a hero. There is a big difference here.
@@sebastiankrueger6209 Shepherd's speech is as realistic as Irons' speech on democracy. You can't give a country democracy right off the bat, they must be given the tools to learn how to use it. Heck, you're forgetting that even Irons is just as hawkish as Shepherd, both men wanted a war for their own goals. The difference between the two is that Shepherd got his war the way he wanted but Irons lost.
@@imgvillasrc1608 A war with no reason outside of saving his own face cause of the Marines that died under his command, and saving his own ass cause the double cross he did to PVT Allen. At least irons says people don’t want democracy, they want rules. He was clear from the git go of his ideas after his son died. Shepard’s Idea of giving democracy is extremely jingoistic, and his actions show nothing but saving his own reputation by igniting a war.
@@dakinoytc986 the freedoom is a ilussion Made by politicians to enforce their flawed rule, we dont really choose, because being a politician is today a career, not something earned and won. He is evil, but only a villain because he want to destroy the status quo Made by the United States
Even I as someone who has never once contemplated playing a Call of Duty game cannot help but find this game's villain to be one of Kevin Spacey's most brilliant performances. One day I might even give this game a try... if this character is anything to go by, it certainly would have one of the more compelling stories of the franchise.
There is far to much truth in his sentiments. Not just in what people want, but in why you cant just turn a country into a democracy. Its a shame that they decided to send the story in the most clichéd direction possible half way through. Would have loved the choice of actually joining Irons in his plans. Would have been a far more interesting story.
@@diligentone-six2688 truth, it's immersive but mw2019 plot seems super realistic but when you look closer it makes zero sense, urzikstan is a desert country placed next to georgia, one of the greenest countries in the world, it's filled with arabs in a region where they should be speaking a turkic language, the whole general barkov thing is kinda weird, it's also unclear where verdansk and kastovia are...
Hardly. Look at South Korea, Japan or Germany. We still have nearly 100,000 troops stationed across them after intervening. The problem is it takes about 50-70 years to be functional, at least two generations need to be born under the new system/government. However, people want it to start working after a few 4-year presidential terms and if it doesn't then leftists demand we pull all the troops, and after it collapses, then those very same leftists claim the collapse (they caused) is evidence of it being a failure the whole time. It's like going to the gym to lose weight and then after 1 day, you scream how you didn't lose 100 pounds thus going to the gym won't ever do anything.
I've been reading political science for a while. Believe me or not this is one of the best short speech on political science. They way he described the reason why democracy doesn't work in those country is impeccable.
I mean it's simplified into a 1 minute monologue. To keep CoD brainlettes from getting bored. So it gets straight to the point. But nothing deep or complex is being stated here.
@@SuperCatacata simplyfying a concept into 1 minutes is the hardest part. Everyone can talk about a complex idea indefinitely. But explaining it in short speech is more helpful.
@@shishirshohan1690 Oversimplifying something so complex into one minute to the point that it isn't even correct in some scenario's isn't difficult. At that point you have ruined the whole argument in order to communicate it to people who don't actually care in the first place. Anyone taking this 1 minute talk a PS 101 professor in highschool would give as absolute fact is being ignorant.. The issue is MUCH more complex and nuanced than that. Nothing deep or complex is being stated here. The fact that you think it is says a lot about your own PS education level. This is literally like trying to argue how Justin Bieber lyrics are super deep and a work of art. They aren't, it's low effort and nothing of substance is actually being said.
@@SuperCatacata when something is so obvious, "oversimplifying" isn't that hard. If you see most of the country without democracy, you will see something common. Most of the people of those countries don't understand how to handle disagreement. Western countries knows how to do this , that's why democracy work in the west. Most intolerant region in the world is middle east. That's why there are no democracy in middle east. So called Arab spring trowed off dictator but they couldn't create democratic countries. You don't know much about geopolitics. You're taking this in the perspective of pop culture, I'm talking this in the perspective of political science. And I think he sums up very obvious things here. Yes there are a lot of explanation and details about that, but what he said is true and fundamental.
This is why I actually align myself with the antagonists and villains in most video games and movies. In this very scene he's proving what went wrong with the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and what happened in Afghanistan in last august
@@albertoquinones1173 Iraq is a republic now. Japan, Germany, and South Korea all work under democratic systems as well. Honestly, the US has a pretty good record in setting up democratic governments. It's really only Afghanistan and Vietnam where they failed. Vietnam was only a failure because public support turned against the conflict. Afghanistan was an absolute shitshow with no coherent plan to maintain a government in a place that had been relatively lawless for most of it's existence. Kevin's rant only really works if your memory only goes back 10 years.
No, he's like all dictators. Freedom rings in the hearts of all people, and eventually they'll manage to mature and overcome these kinds of leaders, and govern themselves. It's the story of England and Scotland, and countless other examples. He's fundamentally wrong, don't be so quick to give into him.
No not of America. About Democracy in general. The US is not the only country with a Democracy however it was until the last 4 years been its greatest flag waving champion. The issue is that what the character said was true. Democracy doesn't work in nation states that don't have the neccessary establishments to support a democracy. In the case of the Middle East. They run by strong leadership and action. If you can protect the people, feed, them shelter them and insure the well-being of them. They will follow you. Can you set up a democracy then? Sure can but only if the people follows you into it and you prove its capable of being done and they create the neccessary steps needed to create and run a democracy.
@@mwroleplay7950 China is a example of what Irons said, Mao massacred millions from hunger but then provided the Chinese security in a war torn land, and the Chinese followed him
@@stephenjenkins7971 No, the dictators are a cost center for American foreign policy makers. Those crackpot leaders are expensive and have to be paid off and given protection in order for us to gain their obedience. From our perspective it is an investment because those dictators make sure American companies are given favorable terms and unrestricted access to their domestic markets. Preferably our pet dictators will kick out all foreign competitors from their countries and give US companies a monopoly. Even better would be if there is nepotism and those dictators breed and make a bunch of spoiled entitled future dictators with expensive tastes. In those cases, we can even manipulate them into letting Americans run their banking system for them. Pull the same old trick that Mayer Amschel Bauer (aka Rothschild) used. Get the national leaders hooked on spending, loan them money that they can't repay on their own so that they have to pawn off national taxes to make their interest payments. All that money then rolls into the US banking system which we use to buy off American voters with cheap mortgages, car loans, student loans, and credit cards to subsidize their lives. That is basically the whole game. It is to take foreigners' money to keep them poor and destabilized so that they will never be able to challenge our supremacy. It also stabilize our position of political power and influence back home, by letting just enough trickle down to peasants so they feel content and don't question anything. Easy peasy.
If you've seen Charlie Wilson's War or Generation Kill you know he's actually speaking straight facts. Democracy requires infrastructure, both physical and social
I mean, he's not entirely wrong. Democracy itself is fragile and, as he said, needs a country with the right building blocks in order to support it. Shortly after the United States was formed, a woman asked Ben Franklin, "What do we have, Mr. Franklin?" "A republic ma'am, if you can keep it," he responds.
@F3DE A., he's wrong about a few things. America hasn't been "trying to establish democracies around the world". It's always been about economic and territorial interests. He also said we do it based on "fundamentalist religious principles". This was laughable. Again, we do it for economic and territorial interests.
@@smokingcrab2290 He didn't said the US did it out of fundamentalist religious principles, he's saying that the US is trying to start democracies on countries based on fundamentalist religious principles. Just a minor pet peeve
@Gamer_Gangster7 But hes correct, when it is more convenient the US has established dictatorships, not democracies. Like in many places in south and central america.
As a historian the first part he said about Democracy is very true. Western democracy is a product of thousands of years of experimentation. While the ancient democracies of ancient Greece and Rome established the building blocks with debate and the sharing of ideas it took the complete collapse of Western civilization with the fall of Rome to begin individualism which evolved first during the Renaissance, then the Protestant Reformation, then the Enlightenment, and even then it would take the American and French Revolutions to bring about Democracy as we know it today. That is over 2000 years of development and you are asking these backward 3rd world countries whose only forms of government they have ever experienced such as absolute monarchy, iron-fisted dictatorship, or tribalism to skip all those stages I previously mentioned and become a modern democracy. It just doesn't work
Im not disagreeing with your point. But it worked for Korea and Japan. Just requires the countries involved to get the proper support required to develop. The Western countries haven't tried nearly as hard to develop the middle east compared to Japan and Korea.
"As a historian..." -- *proceeds to spew a bunch of bullshit that demonstrates an understanding of the world that is below 10th grade history and is clearly biased from a Western perspective, completely ignoring other historical regional perspectives*
To be fair, the whole rogue PMCs versus real militaries is a super interesting concept it's just a shame it was done with the gameplay of advanced warfare. But the same setting with a modern shooter? GOLD.
Today PMCs, unlike in the 60s-90s are shadows of themselves. They are no longer free to take contracts everywere they want, now they are dependant of governments and can only fight those the governments want to, it's shame to see, and why the Mercenary culture has been lost on the face of government controled corpos
@@miguelluisgorospe8417 True, but Russian Wagner and Chinese PMCs are able to challenge developing countries. Looks at the Central African Republic, Syria, Ukraine, and Libya. But yes you're right, the U.S.A. or France will never collapse at the moment to PMCs. Would personally still find it interesting in such settings.
PMCs could never go head to head against a major power during the cold war. Easy to pick on bananna republics, but they were never juggernauts in their own right. A western PMC could never outlast the USSR, they would eventually get ground down. Just like a western PMC couldnt topple the US or a US ally because the US would shutoff its supply or send in Solid Snake
For those who paid attention in the campaign, one of the Atlas primary bases is in New Baghdad, Iraq. Irons explains that Atlas occupied the city for only 10 years and handled it better than the 40 years prior under U.S. control. Showing how Atlas unlimited policy outweighs U.S. foreign policies because they are a private company, and can focus 100% on their priority without worrying about public opinion and politics.
Although taken to the utter extreme, Iron's views here are not unfounded. It's the three key principles of life that he talks about that so many dictators exploit to gain power. The average citizen, the standard joe who works a 9-5 with a wife and kids, cares about only three things. If you promise, and provide, these three things then they will turn the other way so long as those three things are meet. They are; a means to provide for their family, shelter and food, and stability. It's how Hitler, Mussolini, Gaddafi, Hussein, and so many others gained power. Hitler actually hit all three when he took power. Germany, in economic ruin, was desperate for any chance at survival and Hitler provided it through his brutal seizures of Jewish monetary capital which he then redistributed among the German people, ending the near 20 year economic collapse.
The Nazis looted an entire continent and still couldn't win because at the end of the day they were just glorified pirates who didn't know how to manage a country
@@Pierce1996h The Nazi's lost the war for a variety of reasons. Note: I do not support them I merely try to provide all points of view and information I have. But anyways; probably the biggest reason(s) they lost was Hitler himself as apposed to the Nazi's at large. Remember, they held off the combined might of the entire world for over 6-7 years before finally collapsing. Hitler just didn't know when to stop while he was ahead (Poland) and was to impatient.
He is spitting the truth. People think democracy is inarguable answer but they don't consider societies also applies in natural selection. If there was democracy in 14th century the nation is going to fall in a month and become a chaos. Same with poor nations today.
Liberal democracy is an idea, and it has truth and validity to it. If you take the position of government to its most logical conclusion, you always find authoritarianism. But if you take the position of people, then the issue becomes how to protect them. Ideas like democracy, rights and rule of law all protect people from others and themselves. But i suppose it depends what you want to support. The rights of government or the rights of people.
@@Srindal4657 Democracy doesn't exist, that's the problem. It's a false god of the modern system. If the people were capable of governing themselves, why have government in the first place? All "democracies" are, in reality, plutocracies. Democracy is seen as desirable by the rich because it paralyses government from interfering in their business. It's as simple as that.
You know you grown up when the villain you once hated as a child starts to make sense and actually makes very valid points to justify his actions. Questionable methods but valid objective.
don't know what i could say about the second half but the first half is a very solid theory in political science as far as i know: what he describes is basically the political norms of mutual tolerance (acknowledging the legitimacy of political opponents despite disagreements) and institutional forbearance (refraining from using technically legal tactics to work around or antagonize/eliminate those political opponents), without which democracies do in fact fail source: a semester of a us political science course and the 2018 book "How Democracies Die"
@@Admiral45-10 yup that's the plan, it felt like something very relevant and interesting to study given the political climate in the us as well as even in some other nations
He’s right you know. While Irons’ actions weren’t justified by any means, his thoughts on democracy and government were spot on. For some reason our government has this idea that we can just fly over to some third world country that’s been at war with itself for thousands of years, drop a couple bombs, topple a few tyrants and regimes, and just magically set up a democratic government in a place that likely doesn’t even want one, much less have the means to support one if they did. Places like that have been unstable for longer than our relatively young nation has even existed, and somehow we think that we can play World Police and install stable democracies in these places when we can’t even get our own country under control. The US has been trying to do this for decades and all it leads to is more death and destruction. Take Afghanistan for example, we spent 20 something years over there and billions of dollars that could’ve went towards something else, all for what? We just recently pulled our troops out and left billions of dollars in military equipment over there, just for those very same people we used that equipment against to now use to oppress even more people. After the US relinquished control, The Taliban swept across that entire country, taking it back in less than 2 weeks. 20 years, thousands dead, billions wasted, just to be right back where we started.
He's got a point Democracy is a lovely thing, but it requires a lot of foundations to be put in place and a lot of things to go right in order to avoid descending into chaos after the end of the first president's term. Most 3rd world countries simply aren't ready for a republic.
Even in a first world country Democracy fails talk to the average voter for about 5 minutes and you can see why. Having a popularity contest to decide leaders should never happen. Read some Socrates
@@mysteryjunkie9808 I agree with you but if you want to understand modern democracy you must read much more than Socrate. Socrate and Plato lived in ancient time were the most liberal system they knew, Athens, was an exclusive system designed to only favour the few (true, during Themistocles and Cimon that few grew in size but it was still barred from the huge majority of the population), whose roles and duties where much more than just voting but also fight and die for their city (a duty that is far less present in today's world for instance). It wasn't based so much on tolerance or respect but on freedom and bringing advantages to crucial portions of the population. If you want to understand modern (not contemporary) democracy you can read Locke, Montesquieu or even Tocqueville for later works.
Democracy is a lie that deludes the common man that he has authority. In actuality, it allows those with money to control media and newspapers without limit and manufacture public opinion. I suggest looking into Edward Bernays if it isn't blatantly obvious at this point. Liberal democracy also continually erodes morals and stability, and is uncompromising in this path it in the name of freedom.
@O Apeleftherotís ton Anthropón Aftís tis epochís besides all democracys will either give way to subversive dishonest tyranny or total chaos. Either way even in todays world, my faith in democracy is irreparably shattered. I rather live in a sensibly stable society than a so-called "free" one
Yeah but if we let oligarch technocrats rule they'll become corrupt feudal overlords. Democracy, for all its flaws, at least allows governments to be ousted if they prove to be damaging
He's not wrong though. I got a 93 on a Political science paper outlining the necessity for democratic culture over the structure. When people are in a disposition where democratic values are not at the forefront, they'll turn to anyone and any system with enough security, force of will, and in most cases high charisma. The 20th century is synonymous with this, and I am genuinely impressed about how well this scene is written
Kevin Spacey is a master of acting arts. A true artist. His way to talk, the tone of his voice, they way he moves, his stare, what he says. It's rare to find such good actors around.
@@thajemm4371 I think its the genocidal weapon route that seals the deal. There isn't much of a capitalisitic motive to that one. Killing lots of people based on ethnicity doesn't improve you're productivity.
@@thajemm4371 That's literally the part that makes him the good guy. Which is why he turns into a bad guy when he starts ignoring profit and starts trying to control the world with globalism.
This comment section is missing one of the most glaringly obvious errors Irons makes: the US in the past century has never intervened in other countries to “establish a democracy”. It’s done so to ensure global American hegemony. Nothing more, nothing less.
manifest destiny was the genocidal expansion of America (funnily enough when Germany adopted its own genocidal expansion, this was deemed bad) the Monroe doctrine was an imperialist sphere of influence, which again is funny because apparently according to America spheres of influence are bad you can start to see how essentially, whenever America does something its "good" but when another country does it, its "bad".
@Johan Liebert I don't disagree with you that much, it's just funny when we apply your logic to other things in history for example "90% of the decrease in Native American population was because of diseases" is an argument used in another genocide but if anyone were to say this they would be an evil villainous outcast lol
You'd fight for someone who ideals are that he's going to seize authoritarian power and go to war? Kinda weird man. Also this dude does exist in real life and he's a sex offender whose accusers keep mysteriously dying before his trials
It’s sad when you realize he’s talking facts and for a moment, I support him in the idea that you can’t topple a dictator ship overnight or even in a couple of months. They needs strong leader and strong sense of what it means to be a citizen
You know a cruel and terrible as it sounds, I isn't wrong. Sometimes even the villain could always tell the truth. Now this is just my opinion of course.
Actually Ion's words are quite true. People especially non-military background won't care about democracy if their country can ensure better economy, prosperity, safety and better lifestyle. Take Hitler and Mosolline for example, lot of people followed them as they promised better life for their lower suffering class. They rose to the power of dictator becoz lots of people believed in them that they can bring back their country from struggling times.
And they did. The communists teamed up with the Western powers to destroy fascism in Europe but in reality, fascism in Europe sole purpose was to destroy communism, it had no ambition to destroy western civilization, it was a lie. The reason why fascism has been temporarily destroyed is because of the propaganda the western world has made of it and that people currently are happy and love living in their tiny bubble. The moment all hell breaks close and their bubble pops and their leaders are incompetent, democracy will fail and never rise again. Fascism will rise when there is sorrow in a state that has patriotic people. Democracies only succeed domestically if the country is rich, safe and everyone believes almost the same. Once people believe differently in a democracy, everyone will tear each other apart. Iron says this with great wisdom, a leader is meant to keep the people in check so they don't go tearing themselves up.
That’s why I value authoritarianism and see democracy as the enemy. Order, stability and a firm hand is what’s needed. Have that and freedom will follow after.
@O Apeleftherotís ton Anthropón Aftís tis epochís Militaristic Christianity with some authoritarian elements with a combination of capitalism and socialism in the essentials just to appease the masses. I was wondering when the time would come but with everyone against China that time is fast approaching to unite people behind a common cause.
I am actually shocked. This isn't even the usual "villain makes an iota of a point" type of speech. His commentary on Democracy requiring the foundations of tolerance and freedoms is actually insightful.
"The most precious possession in this world in one's own people. For this people and for the sake of this people, well will struggle and we will fight. We will never slacken. Never tire. Never lose courage and never lose faith." -Kevin Spacy
Yes. And democratic regimes are just the way of government more familiar to the USA. If they were monarchists, you'd see monarchies being established around the globe. Same with communists etc...
@@ΧΡΗΣΤΟΣΑΜΑΝΑΤΙΔΗΣ-β7μ dude American government had legit toppled democratically elected regimes to installed dictators that obey the American government, it has nothing to do with democracy period
@@Harry-tm3ck the fact they’ve openly said it’s for America’s interest Or the fact that they’ve toppled government that were democratically elected and installed military dictators
Making a speech does not make a person villian, action does. The speech was spot on: yes there are problem we face in democratic societies but that just simply cannot justify tyranny.
Exactly. Villains are villains because they cherry pick problems with democracy and use them to forward their own fascist agenda showing it as a better solution. Yes, democracies aren't perfect, but they're damn well better than any other alternative. He did hit the nail on the head about US Foreign policy though. It's idiotic to try and establish democracies in countries where the people don't even know what a democracy is nor do they care for one.
@@MohamedRamadan-qi4hl a) middle east isn't one country b) you and the people you know don't represent everyone there. The simple fact that terrorist organisations and religious fundamentalists keep finding support from the people means that democracy isn't the prime agenda on the table. That's why the US lost in Iraq, that's why it lost in Afghanistan. You can seat a puppet and call it democracy but it ain't shit if the people don't prefer it and the various cogs and gears that form a democratic government care more about lining their own pockets.
@@zippyparakeet1074 I see that you are not a native because I can use the example of how long the Muslim brother hood lasted here in Egypt. You see almost every country in the region is not ruled some religious fundamentals but by courpt political elite that is hated by there population
After watching this video Social credits went up over 9000. Jokes aside, Jonothan Irons was actually right about the democracy. (This game was the only thing that Sledgehammer done it right in the 1st place.)
China supports democracies though (China became communist through democratic movement backed by FDR), which is why all the politicians they control try to get America to create democracies because it creates mob rule which allows central control to be established. America is a republic and that's the form of government we really should be establishing as it puts checks on majority rule to prevent dictators.
Iron is damn right about democracy , look how america prove for other country , it's full corpution or collapse like south Vietnam , afghanistan , ... . This is how i like Iron . He is speaking the truth .
@Roniixx instead they became a cheap factory of the Southeastern Asia for West. After all prices need to be as low as possible and more ambitious vietnamese can still migrate westward.
Fun fact. The US was railroaded into the Vietnam Conflict. The South was not a US creation it was a French creation. Vietnam also known as Indo-China was one of the last French Colonies after WW2 and growing resentment of the French government resulted in political and social unrest which resulted in Vietnam having elections, choosing communism and the eventual split of both countries. The US wanted nothing to do with the matter initially but the French whined and pointed out that another Communist government in Asia was another step to the world becoming communist essentially railroading the US into the conflict it didn't want to go into. The US knew indeed most of the nations knew the Southern Vietnam government was corupt tot he core. Everyone knew it. The US knew it, the North knew, the French damn well knew it. Everyone all universally agreed that the North was the better government even the US although in the US case it pointed out that had the south and the french not pissed off a number of the northern leaders its likely they would have ended up more socialist than communist. Afghanistain is known as the graveyard of empires. Not in the way people think. That poor country is the site of thousands of battles going back most of human history empires grew and fell and Afghanistain usually was in someones hands for a few years a few centuries then in someone elses. When the US invaded in 2001 it was to remove the Taliban and its leaders, and the US would have succeeded had the GOP not gone after Iraq. The problem is the US like many nations before it wished to install a democratic or democratic friendly government into Afghanistain but didn't truly understand the situation of its people. Later in the ending years it correctly made the right choice trying to influence the younger generation however what the US should have done was establish a federation for the tribes or a kingdom (puppet state) that would have stabilized the region and gave its people a sense of control over the nation. Have the younger generation learn of democracy and similar so they could take over at a later date. I think in the end the US could have pulled a victory but the last 4 years especially after what the former US leader did allowing the taliban to have representation destroyed the thin morale of the afghanistan government literally bringing its demise a year later during the pullout.
@@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent Even simpler than that: America's major rivals are China, Russia, Europe, and India, and Afghanistan is between all of them.
@@MK_ULTRA420 Yeah. The sad fact to is the Afghanistan is home to large deposits of valuable minerals that can literally turn it into a powerhouse of technological progress if it ever got its act together. All those countries knows it to. In the end Afghanistain likely will end up in the crosshairs soon and all the major powers will end up back to the war torn country. I have a feeling the US will end up back in Afghanistain at some point. Likely the next time working with other allies and not running on the GOP fear mongering that lead it to fight a multi-front war on terror. It has too as well. With China now on more aggressive footing to India and other nearby nations. Its only a matter of time before something happens and that country is right smack as a crossroads.
Comments talking so proudly of democracy in the comments section seems to ignore the last and most important part of the monologue about democracy not being what people truly want.
Technically speaking, Germany, France, Russia, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Greece, and Japan went from autocracy, dictatorship, or monarchy to democracy due to direct or indirect military intervention by the US in the past century ( give or take 10 years).
When a villian monologues and points out flaws in something thrn declares how he/she will take advantage of it... best to better pay attention. It's like a thief saying he/she found a security breach that's making stealing something easier.
@@TwoDollarGararge no kiddies involved ffs, person was 18 (with evidence that it was consensual) so, let's all admit it was mistake to jump to conclusions and give this extraordinary actor more roles!!
This is why America needs to be isolationist to fix its own problems first. We forced ourselves into everything that does not even benefit us. If only we had listened to George Washington and remained neutral.
The United States will not survive now if it went isolationist. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a country to be totally isolationist in this time. Hell, even North Korea still maintains diplomatic relations to its non-enemies.
@@PRubin-rh4sr US is one of the few countries that can. Isolationism doesnt mean zero contact, it means zero international political activism. US still had commercial interactions with other countries during its last isolationism. Hell the westward expansion in the US was in part fueled by the need to find a route to china, to trade with them. US businesses still did business with countries, US government backed them but the govt didnt really have its own agenda it tried to enforce on other countries. You mentioned NKorea, Pacific and Atlantic rim states are instrumental to US's security, thats the extend of your security needs. Why is america involved Ukraine ? Russia doesnt even have meaningful populations on its Pacific end. Americans are manic depressive idiots.
Tell you what, he’s entirely right. This is basically what the templars say in Assassins Creed. People don’t want freedom. They want rules and someone strong to follow
"And you think you can walk into this country based on fundamentalist religious principles, drop a couple of bombs, topple a dictator, and start a democracy?," I mean, I don't 100% agree with the character but he did hit the nail right on the head.
![All Kevin Spacey Scenes in Call of Duty Advanced Warfare [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JjJGi2Ft5OM/mqdefault.jpg)
![All Kevin Spacey Scenes in Call of Duty Advanced Warfare [4K]](/img/tr.png)
"I promise I won't get political"
Irons after one drink:
“CNN harder on Biden than Trump” give me a break.
🦖
@@murphyjackedoff5970 what ?
@@AFGuidesHD Hey, CNN said it not me. I guess when they aren’t being sexual deviants with children (look it up) they apparently are harder on Biden than Trump.
@@AFGuidesHD Daily mail covered Don lemon.
I’ve seen a lot of villain monologues but this was an eye opener.
I know, it’s truly touching.
When the so called bad guy basically says exactly all the things that were thinking yes he's a bad guy but he's right people don't want f****** freedom they want rules order they want to protection they are like children humans are like children they need protection not just from others but from themselves you look on the TV and you see if you arguing over not getting a f****** shot or people arguing over which f****** book is the best give me a break
Villain?
@@Hawaiian_Pizza_Enjoyer Well, within the context of the game's story, he's a villain. He has prior knowledge of a terrorist attack that plans to cause a nuclear meltdown at a power plant but he lets it happen so he can make money and influence off of intervening, and there basically ends up being a small scale chernobyl. He also blows up the Golden Gate bridge while there's tons of civilians on it. He might say a lot of things that make sense, but that doesn't really justify his actions if you ask me.
For edgy 14 year olds maybe
Damm, for a villain he sure knows the world he's on.
that's why they're the "villains"
@@AFGuidesHD what do you mean by that?
This discourse is based on the United States involvement in Iraq
@@andrewiannelli7635 he means that ppl speaking facts are considered the villains
@@canaluludorel5838 meh I guess. You can’t apply that often though.
You know it’s bad when even the villains start talking the truth about society
The joker
The rapist tells the truth? About what?
@@SteveVi0lence Judge the character not actor
@@SteveVi0lence He did what?
@@RussellAdlerCIA he's been accused of sexually assaulting at least 15 kids
To be fair to him, he's hit the nail on the head.
The biggest argument against democracy is having a 5 minute conversation with the average voter
In part yes, he's wrong about democracy being a bad thing, but he isn't wrong when he says the US has a horrendous track record of actually successfully setting up other democracies besides there own.
That is a very meaningful speech. I agree with his speech. I am from China
@@NYG5 or 1 minute with the average villain
@@mwroleplay7950 Indeed
You know, this scene can relate with another cod villain's speech, Gen. Shepherd
"We can't give you freedom, but we can give you the know how to acquire it."
When did he say that?
@@Deathmare235 Team Player
Jingoistic and realistic are two different things. Shepard gave nothing but war. He didn’t want to give tools, he wanted to save face and be a hero.
There is a big difference here.
@@sebastiankrueger6209 Shepherd's speech is as realistic as Irons' speech on democracy.
You can't give a country democracy right off the bat, they must be given the tools to learn how to use it.
Heck, you're forgetting that even Irons is just as hawkish as Shepherd, both men wanted a war for their own goals.
The difference between the two is that Shepherd got his war the way he wanted but Irons lost.
@@imgvillasrc1608 A war with no reason outside of saving his own face cause of the Marines that died under his command, and saving his own ass cause the double cross he did to PVT Allen.
At least irons says people don’t want democracy, they want rules. He was clear from the git go of his ideas after his son died.
Shepard’s Idea of giving democracy is extremely jingoistic, and his actions show nothing but saving his own reputation by igniting a war.
He might be a villiain but he rightfully roasted the entire United States outside policy in *1* minute
Definitely a critique of the position USA was in at the time, Iraq War and all
@@guadalupe8589 yup, it described it perfectly
Rip we can't choose to help him. We only choose Betray. He is really à vilain or he try to do à better world with less freedom?
@@dakinoytc986 the freedoom is a ilussion Made by politicians to enforce their flawed rule, we dont really choose, because being a politician is today a career, not something earned and won.
He is evil, but only a villain because he want to destroy the status quo Made by the United States
@@guadalupe8589 Nothing's changed
When a video game character has more common sense than actual politicians.
Another example senator Armstrong from Metal Gear 😂😂😂
Let's see Paul Allens opinion
that's not even mentioning he is the villain
How about we get Paul Allen’s opinion first
Video game writers > politicians
Palpatine disagrees: He loves democracy, especially when he can turn it into an empire.
He loves adhering to his democracy and let the wheels turn
@@Deathmare235 he loves the republic
One man, one vote, one time!
He loved Democracy so much he shut down the Galactic Senate after being criticized from several senators! 😂
Didn't his empire fall apart in 30 years though.
Even I as someone who has never once contemplated playing a Call of Duty game cannot help but find this game's villain to be one of Kevin Spacey's most brilliant performances.
One day I might even give this game a try... if this character is anything to go by, it certainly would have one of the more compelling stories of the franchise.
If you can stomach mere 5 hours of campaign for 40-60 bucks, yeah.
@@cool06alt guess it's only worth picking up on sale then.
@@HouseOfAlastrian it's not 40-60 bucks anymore lol
@@cool06alt bruh this game is old, prob can get it for 5-10 bucks
@@cool06alt i got it for $3
There is far to much truth in his sentiments. Not just in what people want, but in why you cant just turn a country into a democracy.
Its a shame that they decided to send the story in the most clichéd direction possible half way through. Would have loved the choice of actually joining Irons in his plans. Would have been a far more interesting story.
Can’t really because it’s cod you need to be with America though the sentinel is definitely the bad guys from my pov
Yeah me too, but you now call of duty is scripted from the bones
Unfortunately, Kevin Spacey is Cancelled.
But at least the Remake Modern Warfare Trilogy delivers a strong narrative.
@@diligentone-six2688 truth, it's immersive but mw2019 plot seems super realistic but when you look closer it makes zero sense, urzikstan is a desert country placed next to georgia, one of the greenest countries in the world, it's filled with arabs in a region where they should be speaking a turkic language, the whole general barkov thing is kinda weird, it's also unclear where verdansk and kastovia are...
Hardly. Look at South Korea, Japan or Germany. We still have nearly 100,000 troops stationed across them after intervening. The problem is it takes about 50-70 years to be functional, at least two generations need to be born under the new system/government. However, people want it to start working after a few 4-year presidential terms and if it doesn't then leftists demand we pull all the troops, and after it collapses, then those very same leftists claim the collapse (they caused) is evidence of it being a failure the whole time. It's like going to the gym to lose weight and then after 1 day, you scream how you didn't lose 100 pounds thus going to the gym won't ever do anything.
The irony is, that the "chaos" doesn't even have to be real. People just need to believe it's real.
Just look at mainstream media. Create chaos wherever possible to distract from actual issues.
@@SuperCatacata Precisely.
@@AndrewTheMandrew531 McCarthy did nothing wrong
@@AndrewTheMandrew531 Based and history pilled.
@@AndrewTheMandrew531, so was the army full of communists since the 1960s?
I've been reading political science for a while. Believe me or not this is one of the best short speech on political science. They way he described the reason why democracy doesn't work in those country is impeccable.
I mean it's simplified into a 1 minute monologue. To keep CoD brainlettes from getting bored. So it gets straight to the point.
But nothing deep or complex is being stated here.
@@SuperCatacata simplyfying a concept into 1 minutes is the hardest part. Everyone can talk about a complex idea indefinitely. But explaining it in short speech is more helpful.
I mean it's a pretty tired and rehashed point
@@shishirshohan1690 Oversimplifying something so complex into one minute to the point that it isn't even correct in some scenario's isn't difficult. At that point you have ruined the whole argument in order to communicate it to people who don't actually care in the first place.
Anyone taking this 1 minute talk a PS 101 professor in highschool would give as absolute fact is being ignorant.. The issue is MUCH more complex and nuanced than that.
Nothing deep or complex is being stated here. The fact that you think it is says a lot about your own PS education level.
This is literally like trying to argue how Justin Bieber lyrics are super deep and a work of art. They aren't, it's low effort and nothing of substance is actually being said.
@@SuperCatacata when something is so obvious, "oversimplifying" isn't that hard. If you see most of the country without democracy, you will see something common. Most of the people of those countries don't understand how to handle disagreement. Western countries knows how to do this , that's why democracy work in the west. Most intolerant region in the world is middle east. That's why there are no democracy in middle east. So called Arab spring trowed off dictator but they couldn't create democratic countries. You don't know much about geopolitics. You're taking this in the perspective of pop culture, I'm talking this in the perspective of political science. And I think he sums up very obvious things here. Yes there are a lot of explanation and details about that, but what he said is true and fundamental.
Love him or hate him, he's speaking facts right there.
This is why I actually align myself with the antagonists and villains in most video games and movies. In this very scene he's proving what went wrong with the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and what happened in Afghanistan in last august
@@albertoquinones1173 Iraq is a republic now. Japan, Germany, and South Korea all work under democratic systems as well. Honestly, the US has a pretty good record in setting up democratic governments. It's really only Afghanistan and Vietnam where they failed. Vietnam was only a failure because public support turned against the conflict. Afghanistan was an absolute shitshow with no coherent plan to maintain a government in a place that had been relatively lawless for most of it's existence.
Kevin's rant only really works if your memory only goes back 10 years.
Facts about the state of the US itself
No, he's like all dictators. Freedom rings in the hearts of all people, and eventually they'll manage to mature and overcome these kinds of leaders, and govern themselves. It's the story of England and Scotland, and countless other examples. He's fundamentally wrong, don't be so quick to give into him.
@@Chopstorm. THANK YOU! Finally someone with some damn historical intelligence.
The writers for his monologue, without knowing of course, actually said something that’s very true about democracy and America.
They totally knew, thats why is a reflect of Irak
They knew. You don't write such words "accidentally" while just trying to make the antagonist sound evil, and talk evil antagonist stuff.
No not of America. About Democracy in general.
The US is not the only country with a Democracy however it was until the last 4 years been its greatest flag waving champion.
The issue is that what the character said was true. Democracy doesn't work in nation states that don't have the neccessary establishments to support a democracy.
In the case of the Middle East. They run by strong leadership and action. If you can protect the people, feed, them shelter them and insure the well-being of them. They will follow you. Can you set up a democracy then? Sure can but only if the people follows you into it and you prove its capable of being done and they create the neccessary steps needed to create and run a democracy.
That is a very meaningful speech. I agree with his speech. I am from China
@@mwroleplay7950 China is a example of what Irons said, Mao massacred millions from hunger but then provided the Chinese security in a war torn land, and the Chinese followed him
As Palpatine said in Attack of the Clones:"I love democracy. I love the Republic."
Way better than the Obi Wan comment
As he silently builds an authoritarian regime behind everybody's backs.
@@balashibuyeeter2704 that's the point
All the other CEOs in the room be like
"Shut up dude. Dysfunctional democracies is how we make our bread. Did you miss orientation or something?"
Well they actually make far more bread from dictators feeding off of the misery of their people, but we like to ignore that.
@@stephenjenkins7971 No, the dictators are a cost center for American foreign policy makers. Those crackpot leaders are expensive and have to be paid off and given protection in order for us to gain their obedience.
From our perspective it is an investment because those dictators make sure American companies are given favorable terms and unrestricted access to their domestic markets. Preferably our pet dictators will kick out all foreign competitors from their countries and give US companies a monopoly.
Even better would be if there is nepotism and those dictators breed and make a bunch of spoiled entitled future dictators with expensive tastes. In those cases, we can even manipulate them into letting Americans run their banking system for them. Pull the same old trick that Mayer Amschel Bauer (aka Rothschild) used. Get the national leaders hooked on spending, loan them money that they can't repay on their own so that they have to pawn off national taxes to make their interest payments. All that money then rolls into the US banking system which we use to buy off American voters with cheap mortgages, car loans, student loans, and credit cards to subsidize their lives.
That is basically the whole game. It is to take foreigners' money to keep them poor and destabilized so that they will never be able to challenge our supremacy.
It also stabilize our position of political power and influence back home, by letting just enough trickle down to peasants so they feel content and don't question anything. Easy peasy.
Irons is tired of making money. He has all the money he could ever need. He wants to make *change.*
@@MemeMarine
"That's why my priorities changed from profits to policy."
@@MemeMarine and HE is the bad guy?
If you've seen Charlie Wilson's War or Generation Kill you know he's actually speaking straight facts. Democracy requires infrastructure, both physical and social
That assumes democracy works
@@ninjadragon5661 and it doesnt, democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on who to eat
@@ninjadragon5661 works for a few countries in Europe
@@ninjadragon5661 Winston Churchill once said that: “democracy is the worst form of government - except for all the others that have been tried
@@ProjectEkerTest33 best quote
I mean, he's not entirely wrong. Democracy itself is fragile and, as he said, needs a country with the right building blocks in order to support it.
Shortly after the United States was formed, a woman asked Ben Franklin, "What do we have, Mr. Franklin?"
"A republic ma'am, if you can keep it," he responds.
Pre-Constitution or Post-Constitution?
"not entirely wrong" what was the part where he was wrong again?
@F3DE A., he's wrong about a few things. America hasn't been "trying to establish democracies around the world". It's always been about economic and territorial interests. He also said we do it based on "fundamentalist religious principles". This was laughable. Again, we do it for economic and territorial interests.
@@smokingcrab2290 He didn't said the US did it out of fundamentalist religious principles, he's saying that the US is trying to start democracies on countries based on fundamentalist religious principles. Just a minor pet peeve
@Gamer_Gangster7 But hes correct, when it is more convenient the US has established dictatorships, not democracies. Like in many places in south and central america.
It's scary how exactly true every word he said was.
I'm more scared by the fact it's Kevin Spacey
As a historian the first part he said about Democracy is very true. Western democracy is a product of thousands of years of experimentation. While the ancient democracies of ancient Greece and Rome established the building blocks with debate and the sharing of ideas it took the complete collapse of Western civilization with the fall of Rome to begin individualism which evolved first during the Renaissance, then the Protestant Reformation, then the Enlightenment, and even then it would take the American and French Revolutions to bring about Democracy as we know it today. That is over 2000 years of development and you are asking these backward 3rd world countries whose only forms of government they have ever experienced such as absolute monarchy, iron-fisted dictatorship, or tribalism to skip all those stages I previously mentioned and become a modern democracy. It just doesn't work
Im not disagreeing with your point. But it worked for Korea and Japan. Just requires the countries involved to get the proper support required to develop.
The Western countries haven't tried nearly as hard to develop the middle east compared to Japan and Korea.
@@SuperCatacata Japan is essentially a one party state with an illusion of democracy. Korea is a dictatorship disguised as a democracy.
Definitely not a historian
"As a historian..." -- *proceeds to spew a bunch of bullshit that demonstrates an understanding of the world that is below 10th grade history and is clearly biased from a Western perspective, completely ignoring other historical regional perspectives*
@@Pqndchannel Hey, South Korean here, I think you have the northern half bunched up as Korea as a whole.
To be fair, the whole rogue PMCs versus real militaries is a super interesting concept it's just a shame it was done with the gameplay of advanced warfare. But the same setting with a modern shooter? GOLD.
PMCs of today simply aren't in the position to challenge entire nations and the main thing that they're more interested in is profit.
Today PMCs, unlike in the 60s-90s are shadows of themselves. They are no longer free to take contracts everywere they want, now they are dependant of governments and can only fight those the governments want to, it's shame to see, and why the Mercenary culture has been lost on the face of government controled corpos
@@miguelluisgorospe8417 True, but Russian Wagner and Chinese PMCs are able to challenge developing countries. Looks at the Central African Republic, Syria, Ukraine, and Libya. But yes you're right, the U.S.A. or France will never collapse at the moment to PMCs. Would personally still find it interesting in such settings.
@@Shorthairification It's not exactly fair to use Wagner in this situation, it's less of a PMC and more of a front organisation.
PMCs could never go head to head against a major power during the cold war. Easy to pick on bananna republics, but they were never juggernauts in their own right. A western PMC could never outlast the USSR, they would eventually get ground down. Just like a western PMC couldnt topple the US or a US ally because the US would shutoff its supply or send in Solid Snake
For those who paid attention in the campaign, one of the Atlas primary bases is in New Baghdad, Iraq. Irons explains that Atlas occupied the city for only 10 years and handled it better than the 40 years prior under U.S. control. Showing how Atlas unlimited policy outweighs U.S. foreign policies because they are a private company, and can focus 100% on their priority without worrying about public opinion and politics.
The point:
Democracy is gay
-----------
< ---- -- -----------
Your head o
Although taken to the utter extreme, Iron's views here are not unfounded. It's the three key principles of life that he talks about that so many dictators exploit to gain power. The average citizen, the standard joe who works a 9-5 with a wife and kids, cares about only three things. If you promise, and provide, these three things then they will turn the other way so long as those three things are meet. They are; a means to provide for their family, shelter and food, and stability. It's how Hitler, Mussolini, Gaddafi, Hussein, and so many others gained power. Hitler actually hit all three when he took power. Germany, in economic ruin, was desperate for any chance at survival and Hitler provided it through his brutal seizures of Jewish monetary capital which he then redistributed among the German people, ending the near 20 year economic collapse.
Search up the “stabbed in the back” myth. It explains basically what your saying and how Hitler was able to do it.
The Nazis looted an entire continent and still couldn't win because at the end of the day they were just glorified pirates who didn't know how to manage a country
@@Pierce1996h The Nazi's lost the war for a variety of reasons. Note: I do not support them I merely try to provide all points of view and information I have. But anyways; probably the biggest reason(s) they lost was Hitler himself as apposed to the Nazi's at large. Remember, they held off the combined might of the entire world for over 6-7 years before finally collapsing. Hitler just didn't know when to stop while he was ahead (Poland) and was to impatient.
@@marcusrelicus728 so Hitler’s problem was starting the war in the first place
@@Pierce1996h wait what continent I mean the allies ransacked Africa and parts of Asia
He is spitting the truth. People think democracy is inarguable answer but they don't consider societies also applies in natural selection. If there was democracy in 14th century the nation is going to fall in a month and become a chaos. Same with poor nations today.
The writing here has aged like fucking fine wine
8 years later and we’ve recently seen this speech proven
Liberal democracy is an idea, and it has truth and validity to it. If you take the position of government to its most logical conclusion, you always find authoritarianism. But if you take the position of people, then the issue becomes how to protect them. Ideas like democracy, rights and rule of law all protect people from others and themselves. But i suppose it depends what you want to support. The rights of government or the rights of people.
@@Srindal4657 Democracy doesn't exist, that's the problem. It's a false god of the modern system. If the people were capable of governing themselves, why have government in the first place? All "democracies" are, in reality, plutocracies. Democracy is seen as desirable by the rich because it paralyses government from interfering in their business. It's as simple as that.
@@Srindal4657Democracy at the end of the day is always a oligarchy.
@@dapperbunch5029 if the oligarchs have no power to enforce over people, what does it matter?
@@Srindal4657Read on Italian elite theory
You know you grown up when the villain you once hated as a child starts to make sense and actually makes very valid points to justify his actions. Questionable methods but valid objective.
don't know what i could say about the second half but the first half is a very solid theory in political science as far as i know: what he describes is basically the political norms of mutual tolerance (acknowledging the legitimacy of political opponents despite disagreements) and institutional forbearance (refraining from using technically legal tactics to work around or antagonize/eliminate those political opponents), without which democracies do in fact fail
source: a semester of a us political science course and the 2018 book "How Democracies Die"
So, you're studying Pollitical Science?
@@Admiral45-10 yup that's the plan, it felt like something very relevant and interesting to study given the political climate in the us as well as even in some other nations
@@ARgmffn Ok, that's nice... what you're planning to do in the future after you graduate?
@@ARgmffn Bro read Carl Schmitt please
@@epicbill7446 I am here 2 years later to tell you to not, in fact, read an unrepentant n@zi-lawyer’s pro-totalitarian writings 😊
He’s right you know. While Irons’ actions weren’t justified by any means, his thoughts on democracy and government were spot on. For some reason our government has this idea that we can just fly over to some third world country that’s been at war with itself for thousands of years, drop a couple bombs, topple a few tyrants and regimes, and just magically set up a democratic government in a place that likely doesn’t even want one, much less have the means to support one if they did. Places like that have been unstable for longer than our relatively young nation has even existed, and somehow we think that we can play World Police and install stable democracies in these places when we can’t even get our own country under control. The US has been trying to do this for decades and all it leads to is more death and destruction. Take Afghanistan for example, we spent 20 something years over there and billions of dollars that could’ve went towards something else, all for what? We just recently pulled our troops out and left billions of dollars in military equipment over there, just for those very same people we used that equipment against to now use to oppress even more people. After the US relinquished control, The Taliban swept across that entire country, taking it back in less than 2 weeks. 20 years, thousands dead, billions wasted, just to be right back where we started.
He's got a point
Democracy is a lovely thing, but it requires a lot of foundations to be put in place and a lot of things to go right in order to avoid descending into chaos after the end of the first president's term.
Most 3rd world countries simply aren't ready for a republic.
Even in a first world country Democracy fails talk to the average voter for about 5 minutes and you can see why. Having a popularity contest to decide leaders should never happen. Read some Socrates
@@mysteryjunkie9808 I agree with you but if you want to understand modern democracy you must read much more than Socrate. Socrate and Plato lived in ancient time were the most liberal system they knew, Athens, was an exclusive system designed to only favour the few (true, during Themistocles and Cimon that few grew in size but it was still barred from the huge majority of the population), whose roles and duties where much more than just voting but also fight and die for their city (a duty that is far less present in today's world for instance). It wasn't based so much on tolerance or respect but on freedom and bringing advantages to crucial portions of the population.
If you want to understand modern (not contemporary) democracy you can read Locke, Montesquieu or even Tocqueville for later works.
Democracy is a lie that deludes the common man that he has authority. In actuality, it allows those with money to control media and newspapers without limit and manufacture public opinion. I suggest looking into Edward Bernays if it isn't blatantly obvious at this point. Liberal democracy also continually erodes morals and stability, and is uncompromising in this path it in the name of freedom.
@O Apeleftherotís ton Anthropón Aftís tis epochís besides all democracys will either give way to subversive dishonest tyranny or total chaos. Either way even in todays world, my faith in democracy is irreparably shattered. I rather live in a sensibly stable society than a so-called "free" one
Yeah but if we let oligarch technocrats rule they'll become corrupt feudal overlords. Democracy, for all its flaws, at least allows governments to be ousted if they prove to be damaging
It's crazy how the writers for Advanced Warfare made every single line Irons say complete and absolute fire
He may be a fictional villain in a video game but he described the US’s foreign policy nearly perfectly.
He's not wrong though. I got a 93 on a Political science paper outlining the necessity for democratic culture over the structure. When people are in a disposition where democratic values are not at the forefront, they'll turn to anyone and any system with enough security, force of will, and in most cases high charisma. The 20th century is synonymous with this, and I am genuinely impressed about how well this scene is written
Kevin, my allegiance is to the Republic to Democracy!
Based Obi Wan
@Jamezzz 003. *LONG LIVE THE EMPIRE* 😈
If you're not with him, you are his enemy!
@@dogbert14 Only a Sith deals with absolutes. I will do what I must.
@@TheWarmachine375 You will try!
It’s sad it takes a video game to tell you the truth. It truly is.
Kevin Spacey is a master of acting arts.
A true artist. His way to talk, the tone of his voice, they way he moves, his stare, what he says.
It's rare to find such good actors around.
He's literally the good guy.
No he’s not
Except for the capitalism and private corporation for hire part, yeah he is tbh.
@@thajemm4371 I think its the genocidal weapon route that seals the deal. There isn't much of a capitalisitic motive to that one. Killing lots of people based on ethnicity doesn't improve you're productivity.
@@thajemm4371 That's literally the part that makes him the good guy. Which is why he turns into a bad guy when he starts ignoring profit and starts trying to control the world with globalism.
This comment section is missing one of the most glaringly obvious errors Irons makes: the US in the past century has never intervened in other countries to “establish a democracy”. It’s done so to ensure global American hegemony. Nothing more, nothing less.
manifest destiny was the genocidal expansion of America (funnily enough when Germany adopted its own genocidal expansion, this was deemed bad)
the Monroe doctrine was an imperialist sphere of influence, which again is funny because apparently according to America spheres of influence are bad
you can start to see how essentially, whenever America does something its "good" but when another country does it, its "bad".
@Johan Liebert I don't disagree with you that much, it's just funny when we apply your logic to other things in history for example "90% of the decrease in Native American population was because of diseases" is an argument used in another genocide but if anyone were to say this they would be an evil villainous outcast lol
@Johan Liebert So what disproves that most deaths weren't caused by diseases ?
Then why did we stay in Afghanistan for 20 whole years, most of which were after we killed Bin Laden?
Ive seen hours upon hours of political content, but ive seen such a short and accurate description of US geo politics.
Jokes aside, If this dude was real i would fight for him
he's real. His name is Kevin Spacey
@@1992zorro My guy thinks this is Twitter, he's already out trying to (unsuccessfully) cancel people.
@@olsenfernandes3634 Sadly you cannot cancel him. He cancels you after each christmas message after he kills you with 'kindness'
Join the ATLAS Corporation
You'd fight for someone who ideals are that he's going to seize authoritarian power and go to war? Kinda weird man. Also this dude does exist in real life and he's a sex offender whose accusers keep mysteriously dying before his trials
Irons was spitting some facts
Democracy is a luxury the average person doesn’t have time for when the question on their mind is “where is drinkable water”
It’s sad when you realize he’s talking facts and for a moment, I support him in the idea that you can’t topple a dictator ship overnight or even in a couple of months. They needs strong leader and strong sense of what it means to be a citizen
He's right though
As an american in 2024, i have never felt this is more true
and the sad part is what he told was all true
I can't wait for a Helldiver to stumble across this video
for democracy!
The super earth government is literally built on the ideas irons propose lol
Very touching monologue. I bet Kevin went on to do great things after this performance.
THE WORLD NOW NEEDS PEOPLE LIKE JONATHAN IRONS AND HIS PMC
You know a cruel and terrible as it sounds, I isn't wrong. Sometimes even the villain could always tell the truth. Now this is just my opinion of course.
Actually Ion's words are quite true. People especially non-military background won't care about democracy if their country can ensure better economy, prosperity, safety and better lifestyle. Take Hitler and Mosolline for example, lot of people followed them as they promised better life for their lower suffering class. They rose to the power of dictator becoz lots of people believed in them that they can bring back their country from struggling times.
And they did. The communists teamed up with the Western powers to destroy fascism in Europe but in reality, fascism in Europe sole purpose was to destroy communism, it had no ambition to destroy western civilization, it was a lie. The reason why fascism has been temporarily destroyed is because of the propaganda the western world has made of it and that people currently are happy and love living in their tiny bubble. The moment all hell breaks close and their bubble pops and their leaders are incompetent, democracy will fail and never rise again. Fascism will rise when there is sorrow in a state that has patriotic people. Democracies only succeed domestically if the country is rich, safe and everyone believes almost the same. Once people believe differently in a democracy, everyone will tear each other apart. Iron says this with great wisdom, a leader is meant to keep the people in check so they don't go tearing themselves up.
When the villain is the most down to earth guy in the room
This character is born in 1996 and the game is set in 2054 I can see how he turned out this way after the 2020s
Born the same year as me
Me after, one Starbucks, Mocha Coffee: "0:03"
When the villain is actually the hero of the game
That’s why I value authoritarianism and see democracy as the enemy. Order, stability and a firm hand is what’s needed. Have that and freedom will follow after.
@@kateofone vased
vased and potterpilled
@@kateofone Based
@O Apeleftherotís ton Anthropón Aftís tis epochís
Militaristic Christianity with some authoritarian elements with a combination of capitalism and socialism in the essentials just to appease the masses. I was wondering when the time would come but with everyone against China that time is fast approaching to unite people behind a common cause.
I am actually shocked. This isn't even the usual "villain makes an iota of a point" type of speech. His commentary on Democracy requiring the foundations of tolerance and freedoms is actually insightful.
Jesus shit, this dude speaking straight fax, no printer.
When you grow up you understand villians.
Me: I promise I won’t get political
*Me 3 beers later*
"The most precious possession in this world in one's own people. For this people and for the sake of this people, well will struggle and we will fight. We will never slacken. Never tire. Never lose courage and never lose faith." -Kevin Spacy
Nice square pfp
@@henrycrabs3497 thanks
@@davidward3848 JUST KIDDING LOL YOU DORK! WHAT IS THAT!? ASTROLOGY FOR REDDITORS!?😂😂😂😂
@@henrycrabs3497 I'm not a redditor and it's a 7 or 8 year old political alignment result
@@henrycrabs3497 also I don't believe in astrology
It’s never about installing democracy, it’s about installing ruling power that agrees with America
Yes. And democratic regimes are just the way of government more familiar to the USA. If they were monarchists, you'd see monarchies being established around the globe. Same with communists etc...
@@ΧΡΗΣΤΟΣΑΜΑΝΑΤΙΔΗΣ-β7μ dude American government had legit toppled democratically elected regimes to installed dictators that obey the American government, it has nothing to do with democracy period
Source @@KageNoTenshi
@@Harry-tm3ck the fact they’ve openly said it’s for America’s interest
Or the fact that they’ve toppled government that were democratically elected and installed military dictators
@@Harry-tm3ck the fact that they’ve openly said it’s for America’s interest instead of
Making a speech does not make a person villian, action does. The speech was spot on: yes there are problem we face in democratic societies but that just simply cannot justify tyranny.
Exactly. Villains are villains because they cherry pick problems with democracy and use them to forward their own fascist agenda showing it as a better solution.
Yes, democracies aren't perfect, but they're damn well better than any other alternative.
He did hit the nail on the head about US Foreign policy though. It's idiotic to try and establish democracies in countries where the people don't even know what a democracy is nor do they care for one.
@@zippyparakeet1074 actually I live in the middle east you don't know what you are talking about EVERY ONE HERE WANTS A DEMOCRACY.
@@MohamedRamadan-qi4hl a) middle east isn't one country
b) you and the people you know don't represent everyone there.
The simple fact that terrorist organisations and religious fundamentalists keep finding support from the people means that democracy isn't the prime agenda on the table. That's why the US lost in Iraq, that's why it lost in Afghanistan. You can seat a puppet and call it democracy but it ain't shit if the people don't prefer it and the various cogs and gears that form a democratic government care more about lining their own pockets.
@@zippyparakeet1074 I see that you are not a native because I can use the example of how long the Muslim brother hood lasted here in Egypt. You see almost every country in the region is not ruled some religious fundamentals but by courpt political elite that is hated by there population
@@MohamedRamadan-qi4hl Why are most middle eastern countries authoritarian then?
After watching this video Social credits went up over 9000.
Jokes aside, Jonothan Irons was actually right about the democracy. (This game was the only thing that Sledgehammer done it right in the 1st place.)
Jhonatan Irons**
@@ME262MKI Jahnotan Irons***
China supports democracies though (China became communist through democratic movement backed by FDR), which is why all the politicians they control try to get America to create democracies because it creates mob rule which allows central control to be established. America is a republic and that's the form of government we really should be establishing as it puts checks on majority rule to prevent dictators.
Ok despite Kevin Spaceys reputation. He makes a badass villain still.
Quite true
Is it only me who daydreams with this speech every single day?
It's pretty scary when a little voice in the back of your head pops up whispering "Jonathan Irons did nothing wrong."
Golden words. One of of the best CODs ever!
Iron is damn right about democracy , look how america prove for other country , it's full corpution or collapse like south Vietnam , afghanistan , ... . This is how i like Iron . He is speaking the truth .
@Roniixx instead they became a cheap factory of the Southeastern Asia for West. After all prices need to be as low as possible and more ambitious vietnamese can still migrate westward.
@Roniixx Thats not true. Look at China for instance. Things are not always that simple.
Fun fact. The US was railroaded into the Vietnam Conflict.
The South was not a US creation it was a French creation. Vietnam also known as Indo-China was one of the last French Colonies after WW2 and growing resentment of the French government resulted in political and social unrest which resulted in Vietnam having elections, choosing communism and the eventual split of both countries.
The US wanted nothing to do with the matter initially but the French whined and pointed out that another Communist government in Asia was another step to the world becoming communist essentially railroading the US into the conflict it didn't want to go into. The US knew indeed most of the nations knew the Southern Vietnam government was corupt tot he core. Everyone knew it. The US knew it, the North knew, the French damn well knew it. Everyone all universally agreed that the North was the better government even the US although in the US case it pointed out that had the south and the french not pissed off a number of the northern leaders its likely they would have ended up more socialist than communist.
Afghanistain is known as the graveyard of empires. Not in the way people think. That poor country is the site of thousands of battles going back most of human history empires grew and fell and Afghanistain usually was in someones hands for a few years a few centuries then in someone elses. When the US invaded in 2001 it was to remove the Taliban and its leaders, and the US would have succeeded had the GOP not gone after Iraq. The problem is the US like many nations before it wished to install a democratic or democratic friendly government into Afghanistain but didn't truly understand the situation of its people. Later in the ending years it correctly made the right choice trying to influence the younger generation however what the US should have done was establish a federation for the tribes or a kingdom (puppet state) that would have stabilized the region and gave its people a sense of control over the nation. Have the younger generation learn of democracy and similar so they could take over at a later date. I think in the end the US could have pulled a victory but the last 4 years especially after what the former US leader did allowing the taliban to have representation destroyed the thin morale of the afghanistan government literally bringing its demise a year later during the pullout.
@@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent Even simpler than that: America's major rivals are China, Russia, Europe, and India, and Afghanistan is between all of them.
@@MK_ULTRA420 Yeah. The sad fact to is the Afghanistan is home to large deposits of valuable minerals that can literally turn it into a powerhouse of technological progress if it ever got its act together. All those countries knows it to. In the end Afghanistain likely will end up in the crosshairs soon and all the major powers will end up back to the war torn country. I have a feeling the US will end up back in Afghanistain at some point. Likely the next time working with other allies and not running on the GOP fear mongering that lead it to fight a multi-front war on terror. It has too as well. With China now on more aggressive footing to India and other nearby nations. Its only a matter of time before something happens and that country is right smack as a crossroads.
Comments talking so proudly of democracy in the comments section seems to ignore the last and most important part of the monologue about democracy not being what people truly want.
1:19 when Kevin Spacey sees an unattended child.
This caught me off guard 💀
Finally someone talks abt the sh1t he does irl
AYOOOOOOOOO ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
Not funny, lil brat.
Technically speaking, Germany, France, Russia, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Israel, Egypt, Turkey, Greece, and Japan went from autocracy, dictatorship, or monarchy to democracy due to direct or indirect military intervention by the US in the past century ( give or take 10 years).
Grenada
>Egypt
>Democracy
Hahahahaha.
>Turkey
HAHAHAHAHAHA
>RUSSIA
HAHHAHAAAAA
Goddanm it you are hilarious
Not for Thailand.
US brag about democracy and freedom but also sell weapons to dictator king's personal army to abuse Thai civilians.
Most heroic villain of COD.
Advanced warfare was 10 years ahead of its time
Wished they gave an option to side with him.
My man speaking the truth
You know, if he didn't just randomly attack the US at the end of this campaign for no reason, irons definitely would be the hero of this story.
For a guy who made the racist bomb, he gives some good pointers
Kevin Spacey really tapped on his personal experiences for his role as Jonathan Irons, such a perfectionist.
Uhh
Here's to a wasted potential of an alternate ending where we can side with him instead.
This is pretty much 100% accurate.
What's accurate is how people, like you and the rest of this comment section, are so quick to give into people like this ...
i mean, yeah, trying to make a democracy in a society that can't support a democracy is like telling a toddler to run
Like the game or not, like the CoD franchise or not, the animation in this game was at an entirely new level of awesome.
Because it wasn't animation. It was motion-capture.
@@selohcin MoCap is still a form of animation, and there's quite a few instances where it is done badly.
This is how you write a templar, Assassin's Creed
When a villian monologues and points out flaws in something thrn declares how he/she will take advantage of it... best to better pay attention.
It's like a thief saying he/she found a security breach that's making stealing something easier.
People slept on Advanced Warfare's story.
It aged well.
The president of Super Earth.
Love him or hate him he's spitting facts (We need a Johnathan Irons more than ever)
This aged uncomfortably well....
Imagine Irons teaming up with Sen. Armstrong from Metal Gear
He has a point
Ngl, despite the villainous portrayal, what he's saying here actually makes sense. Aaaaaand I'm on a watchlist lmao
He be speaking facts
I’m gonna say it, Spacey needs to do more roles in games….
No he got caught with some kiddies his career is over
@@TwoDollarGararge no kiddies involved ffs, person was 18 (with evidence that it was consensual) so, let's all admit it was mistake to jump to conclusions and give this extraordinary actor more roles!!
@@guadalupe8589 Bring him back to House of Cards. That last season was absolutely embarrassing.
@@guadalupe8589 At least they were young men (over 18) but it was alleged sexual assault so its still discusting.
don’t care, he’s the best, bring him back
Best villian of the series , amazing kevin spacey , love this game , his speech is soooo true
Honestly at least the plot of this game was ahead of its time. His speech is a lot more impactful after the failure of the US war in Afghanistan
This is why America needs to be isolationist to fix its own problems first. We forced ourselves into everything that does not even benefit us. If only we had listened to George Washington and remained neutral.
The United States will not survive now if it went isolationist. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a country to be totally isolationist in this time. Hell, even North Korea still maintains diplomatic relations to its non-enemies.
@@PRubin-rh4sr US is one of the few countries that can. Isolationism doesnt mean zero contact, it means zero international political activism. US still had commercial interactions with other countries during its last isolationism. Hell the westward expansion in the US was in part fueled by the need to find a route to china, to trade with them. US businesses still did business with countries, US government backed them but the govt didnt really have its own agenda it tried to enforce on other countries. You mentioned NKorea, Pacific and Atlantic rim states are instrumental to US's security, thats the extend of your security needs. Why is america involved Ukraine ? Russia doesnt even have meaningful populations on its Pacific end. Americans are manic depressive idiots.
well thanks RUclips for recommending this again now...
Tell you what, he’s entirely right. This is basically what the templars say in Assassins Creed. People don’t want freedom. They want rules and someone strong to follow
And u have weak bidumb as president.
"And you think you can walk into this country based on fundamentalist religious principles, drop a couple of bombs, topple a dictator, and start a democracy?," I mean, I don't 100% agree with the character but he did hit the nail right on the head.
Gawd I miss Kevin Spacey. I love his acting style.