Beta, the risk-free rate, and CAPM. Calculate the expected return of a security on Excel.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024

Комментарии • 252

  • @nickdimopoulos3842
    @nickdimopoulos3842 3 года назад +83

    This is one of those rare gems that one stumbles upon on RUclips and is eternally grateful for. Thank you very much for the fantastic upload!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +5

      I'm glad it was helpful!

  • @akashram228
    @akashram228 3 года назад +13

    Sir, you just saved my day. I had been confused about how to deal with the monthly figures of market risk. I am doing my assignment and since 2 days I was stuck here. Thank you so muchhhh, you are awesome.

  • @yomanwatsupp5145
    @yomanwatsupp5145 2 месяца назад +1

    me struggling in 2024 being happy after seeing this very useful vid. Thank you very much dear mister

  • @rakeshmoparthi3215
    @rakeshmoparthi3215 4 года назад +6

    It helped me to do my Finance futures contract assignment perfectly. Love from India ❤️

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  4 года назад +1

      Great! Glad it helped.

  • @HnJn-sr3ct
    @HnJn-sr3ct 3 года назад +2

    Helped a lot during my undergraduate project about Samsung Electronics!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Awesome, glad it helped!

  • @chumli2974
    @chumli2974 Год назад +3

    Exactly what I’ve been looking for to complete my assignments. Thank you so much!

  • @pymetrics2811
    @pymetrics2811 3 года назад +1

    Great explanation on how CAPM is calculated. Excellent. thanks

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're welcome. Glad it was useful.

  • @markho4958
    @markho4958 2 года назад +1

    Dear Professor,
    I am a student from physics background. Great to see your step by step tutorial on this subject.
    Two question:
    1.Why you use AVERAGE function ( arithmetic average of return) but not GEOMEAN function ([geometric average of the (1+return) ]-1)
    2.Why this E(Rtsla) from CAPM is preferred but not the E(rtsla) from compounding the daily return? Obviously Tesla (or any arbitrary portfolio) is not necessary to be (or even close to )linear relationship with the benchmark S&P500, in other words, the correlation between Tesla (or any arbitrary portfolio) and the benchmark S&P500 is not necessary to be (or even close to ) +(or -) 1. Then CAPM is just something that never makes sense. Simply compounding the daily return makes a much better sense.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад +1

      Hi Mark, 1) I found the arithmetic average of the daily continuously-compounded return. I then compounded that average 365 times to make convert it to yearly (A couple options here, I could have continuously compounded it (e^(0.031%*365) - 1 = 11.98% yearly) and because there are ~252 per year I probably should have used (e^(0.031%*252) - 1 = 8.13% yearly or (1+0.00031)^252 -1 = 8.12% yearly, which is very close to (ln(3115.34/2109.99)) -1)/5 = 7.79%/year)). 2) I wouldn't say it's preferred, but if you are using the CAPM and its Beta that's the way to do it. IMHO you should always take Beta and CAPM with a grain of salt ... it's based on the past, and the R-squared on the correlation coefficient is generally low. Being you have a Physics background, it's not as precise as calculations you are used to.

    • @markho4958
      @markho4958 2 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk Understood. Much appreciated with your prompt reply!

  • @hafizrasul4734
    @hafizrasul4734 3 года назад +2

    By far the most practical way to calculate return thru CAPM. Thanks a lot😘😘😘

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +2

      Thanks! You're welcome.

  • @vick1812afc
    @vick1812afc 4 года назад +1

    Thanks from Malaysia. Fantastic explanation.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  4 года назад

      You're welcome, I'm glad to hear it helped.

  • @paquirriwifi6812
    @paquirriwifi6812 Месяц назад

    Another lifeguard to be grareful at! 👍🏼

  • @sinvermerlas5331
    @sinvermerlas5331 3 года назад +2

    awesome thanks for sharing this video, Sir David! :) wishing you a great year 2021 :)

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      You're welcome glad it was of use to you.

  • @meobeo009
    @meobeo009 3 года назад +2

    Thank you so much. Great work

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're welcome, Thanks for the positive feedback

  • @lee11986
    @lee11986 3 года назад +1

    Thanks Man it helped me so much. Good Job.

  • @MinruiXu
    @MinruiXu 3 месяца назад +1

    That's very helpful, thank you!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 месяца назад

      You're welcome, glad it helped.

  • @Placomp8829
    @Placomp8829 Год назад +1

    Great video sir. The beta you came up with ie. Co var / var one is it levered beta or unlevered beta?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад

      It's unlevered. Levered Beta takes in to account capital structure effect.

  • @belyndagreen1315
    @belyndagreen1315 3 года назад +1

    You are a life saver. Thank you so much for this video and your help!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're welcome, glad it was helpful!

  • @tasity1041
    @tasity1041 3 года назад +1

    Thank you very much your lecture helped me a lot

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're welcome, glad it helped!

  • @reezalzainudin8097
    @reezalzainudin8097 3 года назад +1

    Terrific explanation. Thank you

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Thanks for the positive feedback!

  • @luisfernandolatorrejaramil7342
    @luisfernandolatorrejaramil7342 3 года назад +1

    That's a great video!... Thanks for your explanation... I would like to learn how to calculate the cost of the debt with your same case (Tesla) and to use with the CAPM to calculate the WACC

  • @quintenpieters1937
    @quintenpieters1937 Год назад +1

    this helped me a lot!! Thank you

  • @kunalsaigal7774
    @kunalsaigal7774 3 года назад +4

    Great video David! Quick question, when calculating the expected return on a stock using Markowitz's efficient frontier portfolio theory why don't we use the expected return on a stock as calculated via CAPM as opposed to calculating its simple average- which is what is usually taught?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Good question. I'm sorry I can't really answer fully without some more thought on it. My first guess is that there's no reason you couldn't substitute the CAPM expected return. I would like to say that I don't think the CAPM is that great of a model because of the generally low r-squared values it has.

  • @TheMunishk
    @TheMunishk Год назад

    In addition to my earlier comments, John you mentioned using log returns or simple returns won't make much difference. But it's actually making in TSLA stock. Using log you are getting annualized return of 47% Vs 81% when using simple returns. Big difference. What should be the preferred way of returns in Stock when large time periods are used? Will really appreciate your comments.

  • @meenakshithakur1591
    @meenakshithakur1591 2 года назад +1

    Hii, thanks for this fanatastic video. Its really easy to understand.I reached late here but still saved alot time.

  • @kalifekadu7539
    @kalifekadu7539 Год назад

    The CAPM is an equilibrium model used to explain the excess return of risky securities in the capital markets. According to the model, the
    excess return of a risky security (the difference between the return of the security and the return of the risk-free rate) can be explained by its
    sensitivity to the excess return of the overall market (the difference between the return of the market and the return of the risk-free rate). This
    can be described by the equation
    𝑬(𝒓𝒊) − 𝒓𝒇 = 𝜷(𝑬(𝒓𝒎) − 𝒓𝒇)
    Where 𝑬(𝒓𝒊) represents the expected return of the risky security, 𝒓𝒇 is the return of the risk-free asset. Hence, the left hand side represents the
    expected excess return of the risky security.
    𝜷 measures the sensitivity of the excess return of the risky security to the excess return of the market overall and 𝑬(𝒓𝒎) represents the
    expected return of the market.
    If we rename the variables as 𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒌𝒚 = 𝑬(𝒓𝒊) − 𝒓𝒇 to represent the expected excess return of the risky asset and 𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒕 = 𝑬(𝒓𝒎) − 𝒓𝒇 to
    represent the expected excess return of the market we can write the following linear model
    Page 3 of 7
    𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒌𝒚 = 𝜶 + 𝜷 × 𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒕 + 𝜺
    If the CAPM is correct then 𝜶 = 𝟎.
    Find the correlation between the returns of each risky asset and the returns of the market. The FTSE100 can be used as a proxy for the
    market.
    Use the returns of each share in order run a regression for the CAPM. The risky free rate is the SONIA rate for the period. Comment on the 𝑹
    𝟐
    of the regression.
    Create a confidence interval for the parameters of the model 𝜶 and 𝜷 and comment on their statistical significance. does this video answer this question ?
    NEED HELP

  • @thebekzod
    @thebekzod 3 года назад +3

    Thanks a lot! Helped me a lot

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      You're welcome, I'm glad it helped!

  • @mirindrahenintsoarakotonia2502
    @mirindrahenintsoarakotonia2502 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so much Professor! You are a life saver

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're welcome, glad it helped!

  • @williamnichol4970
    @williamnichol4970 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for the great upload

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're welcome, glad it was of help.

  • @sarasu3644
    @sarasu3644 Год назад +1

    Thanks David, just have a question about the Beta.
    In the video, you get to Beta = 1.197 by regressing R(S&P) with R(Tesla); but the CAPM model' beta, according to the equation, shouldn't it be the slope of the two excess returns, [R(Tesla) - Rf] / [R(S&P) - Rf]?
    I'm not sure the two Betas are the same? If I regress the two excess returns, will I get a different beta than 1.197? Thanks

    • @sarasu3644
      @sarasu3644 Год назад +1

      Well in fact, the differences are minor. Thanks anyway, the video is very helpful!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад

      Hi, you're technically correct, although when I recorded the video rf was so low, the beta was not efflected much at all. I can see with higher risk-free rates that you should do it that way.

  • @netexponent6217
    @netexponent6217 Год назад +1

    Thank you for this video. It was of great help.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад +1

      Glad it helped!

    • @netexponent6217
      @netexponent6217 Год назад

      @@DavidJohnk just one question. While calculating risk free rate, I understand it is already annual data but I want to take 3 months T bill rate as risk free, So, do I have to convert this average figure into 3 months by dividing it by 12 and then multiplying by 3 ?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад

      @@netexponent6217Hi, I'm not sure what you're trying to do, but here's how I would convert annual to every quarter: rquarterly = (1 + rannual)^(1/4)-1

  • @matthewrosseland9096
    @matthewrosseland9096 3 года назад +2

    When converting E(rm) daily into E(rm) yearly, shouldn't we use the number of trading days (252) as opposed to the number of calendar days (365) in a year?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +2

      Yes, I agree, that would be more correct in this case. With monthly or weekly conversion I would stick to 12 and 52. Another thing that I don't do is subtract the risk-free rate from the market and stock returns ... it doesn't affect the results much so I skipped that step.

    • @matthewrosseland9096
      @matthewrosseland9096 3 года назад +1

      @@DavidJohnk Thanks! Great video. I am attempting to calculate the Sharpe ratios of various weighted portfolios to find the ideal weighting of individual stocks within a portfolio. Not sure if I can combine this analysis with CAPM in a meaningful way, but interesting nonetheless.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      @@matthewrosseland9096 I have a video where I show how to do that. ruclips.net/video/U-QiAGXS3aE/видео.html

    • @kevinirani
      @kevinirani 3 года назад

      More or less. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to me. You know where to find me.

  • @Poisineagle
    @Poisineagle 3 года назад +3

    Hello Professor!
    Thank you for this video, I just have a couple questions that I was not able to find answers to online to help with my research.
    1. What time period should I use when doing these models?
    2. Do different time periods tell me different things?
    3. Should I only be using the past year of data if I want to analyze a current portfolio? Or will going as far back as 2015 help? Or maybe that far back is not as significant for us nowadays.
    Sorry to ask so many questions, if instead of answering these you could let me know what book/article would be good for the technical side of the model please let me know! Thank you!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      1. There is no set rule but I would set the time length accordingly to how often you plan to trade, longer periods for longer times between trades. If your studying 10 years of data I would go weekly instead of daily.
      2. and 3. I think answered those in 1. a year would be good Good luck

  • @danielschink9779
    @danielschink9779 3 года назад +3

    Hi there, thanks for the super helpful video. Question about the rf rate. Since you converted the expected market return from daily to yearly, shouldnt those daily risk free rates be convrted to yearly as well? or am i missing something? thanks again! Also if I am doing this on a new company with only 2 years of data, is a 2 year period sufficient to get an accurate beta?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +2

      The Fed already has the risk-free rates yearly and in percent.

  • @mohitkr080886
    @mohitkr080886 3 года назад +1

    Hi David, Great video.
    I want to ask one question did you mistakenly took 26 weeks for 90days T-billswhen you delete the headings and count to 7. I think it should be count 6 for 13-weeks and not count 7. please clarify.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      No, it was the coupon equivalent 13 weeks on the 7th column. The first column is the date. I don't think it would be a huge error to use the 26 week anyway :)

    • @mohitkr080886
      @mohitkr080886 3 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk Thank you so much. your video helped me a lot in finishing one of the CAPM assignments.

  • @eshapilinja9568
    @eshapilinja9568 3 года назад +2

    hey, was a great video...but i was just wondering if the slope formula y/x is correct in Excel aren't the known y the dependent variables and the knowN x the independent variables?, so it should be =SLOPE(C3:C1260,F3:F1260)?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Hi Esha, it should be Tesla returns on the y-axis (dependent variable).

  • @thebekzod
    @thebekzod 3 года назад +3

    Mr Johnk, could you please explain why daily risk-free data turns into annual after averaging it? (at 15:15)

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Hi, It is already annual and in percent from the fed. All we did was avg. it. Hope that makes sense.

    • @gowthamdhanasekaran3908
      @gowthamdhanasekaran3908 2 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk how did u identify that it is already annual?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад

      @@gowthamdhanasekaran3908 I don't remember where I knew that from, I learned it quite a while ago. Sorry. If you look at the history you can see sometimes it's quite high. In present times it's low so hard to tell. It's also in % already.

  • @cephasadejoh7557
    @cephasadejoh7557 2 года назад +1

    Great Video. Quick question, why are we using 365 days when annualising the returns. I thought it was 252 due to the fact that the stock axchange doesn't trade everyday (weekends, holidays etc) and also the closing prices are only available for those days.

  • @chuwenfu3810
    @chuwenfu3810 3 года назад +1

    For the Returns calculation, whats the difference between using the method of: (New Value/Original Value) - 1, vs using (New Value-Original Value) / Original Value?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      The two formulas give exactly the same answer. The first one is considered easier by most.

    • @chuwenfu3810
      @chuwenfu3810 3 года назад +1

      @@DavidJohnk ok thanks prof!

  • @NawafAlbetiri
    @NawafAlbetiri 3 месяца назад +1

    Thank you so much!!!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 месяца назад

      You're welcome, glad it helped.

  • @sylvesteransah7047
    @sylvesteransah7047 3 года назад

    Another helpful video. Thanks David! I just subscribed to your channel.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're welcome, thanks for subscribing!

  • @GoodEveningDota
    @GoodEveningDota 5 месяцев назад +1

    I didn't know God had a RUclips channel

  • @PatriciaSamuel-gq9vg
    @PatriciaSamuel-gq9vg Год назад +1

    Why do you use continuous return (ln(new/old) when calculating ERm instead of just percent change ((new-old)/old)?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад

      The continuous return has properties which periodic return doesn't, but it's works fine to use the periodic return formula: (new-old)/old or the short cut periodic return formula: new/old - 1

  • @miracleiloh7038
    @miracleiloh7038 2 года назад +1

    Amazing video... Thanks pretty much Sir

  • @TheMunishk
    @TheMunishk Год назад

    Very nicely explained. Thanks so much. Question: In case I am using 5 year data for a stock and market, can I just take an average of the 5 year return, or is this not the right way? Will really appreciate your response.

  • @Danyghansar
    @Danyghansar Год назад +1

    Hi thank you for this video. One question: why would you use the average risk free rate to calculate the cost of equity and not the current risk free rate. From what i understand using a historical average risk free rate is problematic since it doesn’t take into account current market conditions.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад +1

      I've seen the current rate often used, that's a good way and easier to do.

  • @xiaohaoyi
    @xiaohaoyi 3 года назад +1

    It seems to me that there is something strange about the annualized return formula. If daily return is only 0.03%, how is it possible that annual return be 11.97%.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      The formula is fine, but you may want to use 252 instead of 365 due to that many observations in a year.

    • @nic1340
      @nic1340 3 года назад

      Excel automically turns the percantages into numbers when calculating. However, when you use calculator, yu have got to remember that 0.03% actually has a value of 0.0003 not 0.03. If you use the actual value (0.0003) and put that into the expected yearly return formula, you should get the same answer as the one David got in excel.

  • @mahdihasan2744
    @mahdihasan2744 2 года назад +1

    Hi, thank you for the great video. But I have a question.
    When calculating E(Rm) , what power should be used in the yearly equation if the monthly average is on 8 years of monthly data (96 months)? Will it just be 12?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад +1

      Yes, if it's 12 observations per year use 12. Hope that helps!

    • @mahdihasan2744
      @mahdihasan2744 2 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk Thank you very much. This helps a lot.

  • @yunrisnaaditya5554
    @yunrisnaaditya5554 3 года назад +1

    So grateful found this video.. Btw from the TSLA CAPM expected return, it was considered undervalued?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Here's a video I made on that subject, not sure it will help: ruclips.net/video/-85S9nHUI88/видео.html

  • @ashwatilrahmatanjung1912
    @ashwatilrahmatanjung1912 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so Much

  • @sparkacademynetmanagement6689
    @sparkacademynetmanagement6689 4 года назад +1

    GREAT WORK

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  4 года назад +1

      Thanks for the positive feedback.

  • @kunalsaigal7774
    @kunalsaigal7774 3 года назад +1

    Would it not be more accurate to convert daily into yearly prices based on the number of observations per year- that being raising to the power of 252 vs 365? Or am I missing something here? Thanks

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're correct, it would be more accurate.

  • @TheMrsaw2
    @TheMrsaw2 3 года назад +1

    hello professor, if we were applying this model for a multiple assets porfolio for 3 months only on a daily-data, should we convert the risk free rate or not ???

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      You could convert the risk free to daily and just leave everything in daily. Just keep units consistent

    • @TheMrsaw2
      @TheMrsaw2 3 года назад

      Thanks a lot professor, i'am actually doing different stock portfolio analysis i was wondering if i should use the optimal porfolio for this model or just the one i chosed first

  • @xdmondx
    @xdmondx 3 месяца назад +1

    Must the timeframe of the market return be the same as the one of the Beta? Or could I use the past 5 years for calculating my Beta and the last 10 years for my market return?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 месяца назад

      I would try to keep with the same timeframe

  • @6toolbaseball
    @6toolbaseball 2 года назад +1

    Thank you so much! I had been multiplying daily returns by 52. For converting weekly return standard deviation into annualized return standard deviation, can you just do sqrt(52)*weekly return standard deviation?

  • @glassice9332
    @glassice9332 2 года назад +1

    Hello sir, excellent clear video thank you. What if the expected return of a market is negative for a specific year? If we assume positive beta and a risk free rate lower than the return of the market , then would we have a negative CAPM? And what is the interpretation of a negative CAPM value? Thank you.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад

      It's possible for the CAPM to calculate a negative expected return. Remember, the CAPM is just a model which is attempting to predict the future on past historic performance.

  • @alaaali2632
    @alaaali2632 3 года назад +1

    I have a question related to market return as you said in the video we should convert to annual, so if my data are daily for 2020 and 2021 only, It is right to make an average for only 2 years ( annual ) and ignore the rest of years?
    thank you very much

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +2

      Yes, I would just work with two years of data to make the time-frames match.

  • @sudroy
    @sudroy 3 года назад +1

    Great video but one question: if the treasury rate yields are 90-days and are the daily yields, how can we say that they are already yearly?
    Also, if I used the 6-month Yield curve rates, are those also annualized and will I have to convert them into semi annual rates to compare them with a 6 month market return?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Great question! They annualize it, similarly to what was done in the video. The six-month is the same.

    • @sudroy
      @sudroy 3 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk Thank you for your response, Professor. So the 6-month rates are not of T-Bills which mature in 6 months but are the annualized rates? So I must divide the 6-month T-Bills by 2 to get the annualized rate?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      @@sudroy You can either annualize your six-month return to r(annual) =(1+r(six-month))^2 - 1 or make the t-bill annual yield a r(six-month) = (1+r(t-bill))^(1/2) - 1 ... don't just divide by two.

    • @sudroy
      @sudroy 3 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk Thank you so much, Professor! What is the formula you used in the (1+(t-bill)^0.5-1?

  • @damienhawkins6154
    @damienhawkins6154 4 года назад +1

    Great video!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  4 года назад

      Thanks! I'm glad it helped.

  • @dafnemata4107
    @dafnemata4107 Год назад +1

    Thank you for the video, so clear and helpful. I am struggling with downloading the s&p500 excel though, what can I do? It doesn’t give me the option to download.
    My professor wants us to find the risk free rate for 5 companies, does that mean I have to find the beta for each company first so I can check what days to use for the treasury website?
    ( my class is in Spanish for study abroad which is why I’m struggling a bit more with what I’m supposed to do)

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад +1

      Hi Dafne, You can try downloading the S&P500 here: finance.jasonstrimpel.com/bulk-stock-download/ use ^GSPC as the ticker. Yahoo finance doesn't have that option on their website any longer. If you're using daily data just use the latest 90 day treasury rate for Rf from here: www.marketwatch.com/investing/bond/tmubmusd03m?countrycode=bx for instance today it's 4.684% so the daily Rf is (1+.04684)^(1/252)-1 = 0.0182%/trading day. Hope that helps! Dr. Johnk

  • @prabhjinderaulakh
    @prabhjinderaulakh 4 года назад +1

    another great video

  • @albertogonzalez8398
    @albertogonzalez8398 3 года назад +1

    Thank you for this great video! I'm a bit curious as to why did you choose the 90 Day T-bill vs 182 or 364 Days T-bill?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +3

      Hi Alberto, I used the 90-day T-bill because that's the one I see most often in my financial research readings. It kind of makes sense to use a shorter maturity because it has a smaller maturity risk premium.

    • @albertogonzalez8398
      @albertogonzalez8398 3 года назад +1

      @@DavidJohnk Thanks for the reply this makes perfect sense. If you don't mind I have another question. In the part where you are anualazing the market return, is there a reason why you are using the formula "R_yearly=(1+R_daily)^365 ", from my understanding this formula is used when dealing with simple returns. Since you are compounding the return, shouldn't the multiplication of the average daily market return and 365 days suffice? Given the properties of using natural logarithm. Thanks again for taking your time and answering my question :)

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +2

      @@albertogonzalez8398 You're correct, the returns were calculated with ln(end/begin) therefore it's continuously compounded. The calculations will most likely be very close as long as you stay consistent between Market and security/portfolio. Times 365 days or 252 trading days will also work. The fed doesn't do t-bill rate continuously either, but that number is very small anyway. like I said, I think if you stay consistent you should be pretty close.

  • @sofiewantytan5358
    @sofiewantytan5358 3 года назад +1

    Dear Sir, thank you for the video. May I ask why the annualised return on market is not used instead (geometric mean)?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      I'm not sure what you mean, I did use a geometric calculation when converting the avg return to yearly.

    • @sofiewantytan5358
      @sofiewantytan5358 3 года назад +1

      Apologies for not being clear. I would like to ask if we can use the annualized rate of return for the market instead?

  • @kimberlyvaldes2587
    @kimberlyvaldes2587 3 года назад +1

    Thank you SO MUCH!

  • @wetstoffels3198
    @wetstoffels3198 3 года назад +1

    What if you are comparing more than two stocks? Average them, or do a beta for each and every single combination?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      You can do a Beta for each, then the portfolio Beta will be a simple weighted avg of the betas. It's one of the great things about Beta! If you invest $1,000 total and $250 in one and $750 in the other your weights would be 25% and 75% respectively. The portfolio beta would be equal to (beta stock one X 25%) + (beta stock two X 75%). You could also calculate Beta on the portfolio return, it would be the same. Great question!

  • @HelLo-dl4ne
    @HelLo-dl4ne 3 года назад +1

    Is there a specific reason for using LN?
    Why not divide the new by the old price then subtract one?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      Great question, dividing and subtracting 1 gives the daily rate. The beta calculation will be close either way. Dividing the natural logarithms gives a continuous return. Not a big difference, but continuous returns are additive (return for day 1 plus return for day 2 adds up to the continuous return for both days). Hope that makes sense!

  • @klaramanning2589
    @klaramanning2589 3 года назад +1

    How does one interpret the result given from CAPM? Do we compare E(Rtsla) to E(Rtsla) yearly and what would this mean for the value of the stock? Thanks for the video!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      Great question! The CAPM is a backward-looking model that tries to predict the expected return in the future. The key word is "expected". In real life returns are almost always different, they could be lower or higher. I would definitely use more than one model for stock valuation, not just the CAPM. The CFI website has a good summary: corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/trading-investing/stock-valuation/

    • @klaramanning2589
      @klaramanning2589 3 года назад +1

      @@DavidJohnk Thanks! Based on the result we got from the CAPM here, does it look like investing in Tesla stock is a good or bad idea? Why is the expected return based on average historical data so far from the expected return calculated using CAPM?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      @@klaramanning2589 Hi Klara, the difference in calculations is due to the methodology difference. Both estimates are based on past performance and should be taken with a grain of salt. Tesla has done very well the last year, but it is a very volatile stock. If you are planning on holding the stock for a longer time and don't get nervous with large up and down price swings, I think it might be a great idea to hold some of their stock in a portion of the total value of a portfolio. I think Tesla has many synergies and a solid future strategy, including two huge factories being built (Austin, TX and Berlin, Germany) and a factory expansion in China. They also have a supercharger network, state of the art self-driving technology, new models including the Cybertruck, which has over 650,000 preorders and counting. I could keep going but when I invest I look at the future for the company, and I think Tesla is pretty solid in that regard. Of course, if you research it, you will see people with the opposite opinion to mine. I do "put my money where my mouth is" as I presently own Tesla stock. Hope that helps!

    • @klaramanning2589
      @klaramanning2589 3 года назад +1

      @@DavidJohnk That’s very helpful, thank you!

  • @altmile2346
    @altmile2346 2 года назад +1

    Hi, i have a question. Is this a time-series regression. Also is the expected returm the same as the excess return?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад

      Yes this is a time-series regression, you can take a look at this video also: ruclips.net/video/j65sNTANYVk/видео.html
      He uses monthly data, runs a different regression, and subtracts the risk-free rate from the numbers to get Excess returns (technically, a more correct way to do it)

  • @thihavibui7645
    @thihavibui7645 3 года назад +1

    Have a good day Sir, thank you so much for the video. Have you ever computed the model international CAPM written by Adler and Dumas? I have read about it, but No one made an application of this model into detail. Thank you so much in advance and look forward to your answer.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      No, I haven't. I will look into it.

    • @thihavibui7645
      @thihavibui7645 3 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk Thank you so much Sir, in my opinion the ICAPM is a bit complicated. I will look forward to your video about it. Have a nice day Sir.

  • @misssteak1290
    @misssteak1290 3 года назад +1

    what's the difference between the expected return of tesla that we acquired from yahoo finance and the CAPM one?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      One was simply looking at the historical average returns, the other CAPM expected return.

  • @yipchar9784
    @yipchar9784 3 года назад +1

    Great video, can I ask why do you use S&p 500 as the market. If using for example GM, do I still use the same market?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      Thanks! GM is listed on the S&P 500, but the CAPM theory is based on the entire market, not just the S&P 500. I used the S&P 500 as an estimate of the entire market. Hope that makes sense.

    • @yipchar9784
      @yipchar9784 3 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk Makes sense, thanks a bunch!

  • @dubstepsubelectro
    @dubstepsubelectro 2 года назад

    Hi! Great video ! I have a question, they gave us tbill uk tender middle rate (UKTBTND) and I need to run regressions every month to find a and beta of stocks for every month that i have. Rm= ftse 100 , do I need to calculate the annual tbill uk? And how?

  • @nakthek1611
    @nakthek1611 4 года назад +1

    Thank you so much sir...🙏👍

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  4 года назад

      You're welcome, glad it helped!

  • @marshm3751
    @marshm3751 3 года назад +1

    I don't suppose you know how to look up daily treasury bills for Canada? i am at a road block when it comes to calculating CAPM. HELP!! Thanks a million!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      I'm not sure, in many cases, you can use the US risk-free rate.

  • @ayeshindika7762
    @ayeshindika7762 Год назад

    Why shouldn't we convert the average t bill rate to yearly rate?

  • @muse4812
    @muse4812 3 года назад

    can anyone please try calculating KLSE expected rate of return? What is the reason behind it get a negative value rate of return on KLSE Malaysia index?

  • @desmondyang8529
    @desmondyang8529 3 года назад +1

    Hello!! Thank you for the video! May i check with you if we can use 26 weeks or 52 weeks treasury yields instead of just 90 days?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      That will work.

    • @desmondyang8529
      @desmondyang8529 3 года назад +1

      @@DavidJohnk thank you! May I ask why the average rf that you calculated is yearly? I thought you took the daily rates? Shoudn't you need to convert it into the effective yearly rate?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      @@desmondyang8529 Treasury already reports it as yearly and in % no conversion necessary

  • @nma4807
    @nma4807 Год назад +1

    really useful!!!!!!

  • @weiyin9998
    @weiyin9998 2 года назад +1

    Hello Professor thanks for the clarification! Can i know since my data for risk free rate is daily , how can i make it to monthly risk free rate ? ! Appreciate your help

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад

      Assume a 30-day month and your daily rate is .05%/day. It would be: (1+.0005)^30-1 = 1.5109%/month. Just multiplying by 30 would be 1.5000%/month (an error)

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад

      Posting the risk-free rate on daily basis doesn't mean it's a daily rate (it still might be a yearly rate, changing each day).

    • @mahdihasan2744
      @mahdihasan2744 2 года назад

      I need to calculate this on 8 years of monthly historical data? What would be the power used for calculating yearly E(Rm)?

  • @yuwiieee
    @yuwiieee 3 года назад +1

    Why did you convert the market return to yearly but not the risk free return?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Risk free rate is already yearly

  • @notsomuchhere1387
    @notsomuchhere1387 3 года назад +1

    Why is the first date left blank when you calculated the daily returns?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      You need two days to calculate the return. You lose one day because of that.

  • @letterfake8319
    @letterfake8319 2 года назад +1

    Can somebody answer what to use as the risk free rate? Do we use the bond rate or the treasury rate for our risk free rate?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад

      I see the 10 year treasury bond rate used occasionally

  • @mikeylejan8849
    @mikeylejan8849 3 года назад +1

    should the days line up?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      Yes, they should. That's why I try to keep the dates beside each set of data. So I can keep an eye on that.

    • @mikeylejan8849
      @mikeylejan8849 3 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk oh man I am using the SP 500 as my benchmark but when I check the dates it skips some dates.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      @@mikeylejan8849 You could take the average of the date on either side to get close. Hope that makes sense!

  • @newlistbaba
    @newlistbaba 5 месяцев назад

    while calculating Rf you have taken bond yield daily one as yearly. could you please check it!

  • @samhowell3214
    @samhowell3214 Год назад

    Where can you find coupon rates for times dating back to 1980's. The U.S Dept of Treasury only goes back to 2002

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад

      I don't know off the top of my head. Sorry couldn't help more!

  • @kayococal
    @kayococal 3 года назад

    thanks so much

  • @Juanitoooooooooooooooooo
    @Juanitoooooooooooooooooo Год назад +1

    hello, thx for the video very useful, but when i calculate the average for the risk free i have the error #DIV/0! how can i fix that? thank you.

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад

      Not sure, check the formula for zero's is all I can think of.

  • @johnloo9388
    @johnloo9388 3 года назад

    If I am a US investor and I want to evaluate stock that is located in France (e.g. Loreal), should I use France's risk-free rate instead of the US risk-free rate?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      No, I would use the US rf rate.

  • @PartSeventeen
    @PartSeventeen 3 года назад

    THANK YOU SO MUCH !!!!!!

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      You're welcome, glad it was useful to you.

  • @sachinpk6
    @sachinpk6 2 года назад

    Hi David, can you please tell me why did you select that column only( 13 weeks bank discount coupon equivalent) as Rf rate?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  2 года назад +1

      I wanted the 90-day t-bill.

    • @sachinpk6
      @sachinpk6 2 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk okay. Got it. Thanks..

    • @sachinpk6
      @sachinpk6 2 года назад

      One question; why you didn't convert average Rf to yearly...
      for market return you converted daily to yearly but not for risk free rate though you downloaded daily 90-day treasury bill.

  • @sakshamgarg6953
    @sakshamgarg6953 3 года назад +1

    What about Systematic/unsystematic rate?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      The systematic rate is the Market risk premium (rm - rf). Unsystematic is everything else.

  • @nurulhuda-nb3jv
    @nurulhuda-nb3jv 2 года назад

    while transform the data, my data have some null data, how to clear it

  • @kejiang322
    @kejiang322 3 года назад

    Shouldn't we use (1+daily chang%)^trading days to get the yearly return?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      I've seen it done both ways ... that might be more correct since there are ~252 observations.

  • @likesseasaltice
    @likesseasaltice 3 года назад

    Sir, if you use the s&p500 who doesnt reinvest dividends and the tesla adjusted closing price, which corrects for dividens and splits, dont you recieve spurious results?

    • @likesseasaltice
      @likesseasaltice 3 года назад

      Wouldnt it be advisable to use the s&p500 total return index instead?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      @@likesseasaltice It should be very close either way. I just did daily for the last year on TSLA and compared, Beta was off by 0.000201, in my opinion not enough to worry. bit.ly/3jPtO10

    • @likesseasaltice
      @likesseasaltice 3 года назад

      @@DavidJohnk thank you so much sir !
      I am currently writing my paper on esg performance and i am asking myself whether i can use the adjusted closing price of both distributing and reinvesting mutual funds as a comparison basis.
      Do you think that dividend yield is correctly considered by the adjusted closing price?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      @@likesseasaltice I've always thought so, on finance.yahoo.com anyway.

  • @PhuongNguyen-ew1ze
    @PhuongNguyen-ew1ze 2 года назад

    How do we calculate the covariance matrix belong to yearly?

  • @dreadroid5671
    @dreadroid5671 3 года назад +1

    sir, Can the calculation of the return be applied to the Sharpe ratio?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      yes, it's just (rj - rf)/std dev j ... make sure frequency (daily, monthly, etc.) is the same on all calculations.

    • @dreadroid5671
      @dreadroid5671 3 года назад +1

      @@DavidJohnk thanks sir, your video helps me a lot

  • @bryanrodas9594
    @bryanrodas9594 3 года назад

    Can you use capm to calculate monthly expected returns instead of yearly expected returns?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад

      yes, just keep the units consistent.

  • @maryamalqassimi6875
    @maryamalqassimi6875 3 года назад +1

    hello, why have you chosen 13 weeks for the coupons?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +2

      Many finance professionals use the 90-day (13 week) t-bill for the risk-free rate. Sometimes other maturity US treasury bonds are used and acceptable.

  • @sohammule5401
    @sohammule5401 5 месяцев назад

    Sir, when you calculated Risk free rate why its yearly ?

  • @user-zs1wy1ln9c
    @user-zs1wy1ln9c Год назад +1

    Why we take 90day?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  Год назад

      You don't have to use the 90 day, it's very typical the 10 year bond is often used as well in financial research.

  • @asenandres9719
    @asenandres9719 3 года назад

    Hello sir! What if I only have 2 months of data, do I still use the computation for the E(rm) yearly?

    • @DavidJohnk
      @DavidJohnk  3 года назад +1

      You could leave all your data in daily returns. Just make sure your units are consistent in all calculations. Hope that makes sense.

    • @asenandres9719
      @asenandres9719 3 года назад +1

      @@DavidJohnk Thank you, sir. Your videos are really helpful.