AI Remade The Wizard of Oz EXACTLY as described in the books
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 июн 2024
- AI recreated the beloved characters from the children's novel The Wizard of Oz and other books from the series by American author L. Frank Baum.
Become a Patreon: / screenai
Support me via: ko-fi.com/screenai
Follow me on Instagram: / screenai.official
Image generated by: app.leonardo.ai/?via=screenai
Learn a new language by watching movies: lingopie.com/?ref=zmvhnwn&utm...
Create AI voices: elevenlabs.io/?from=partnerph... 
Кино
![Rob49 - On Dat Money (with Cardi B) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fTFS58mHJh8/mqdefault.jpg)
Tin Man had villain vibes. I wouldn't have wanted to run into Metal Freddy Krueger holding his ax like that.
He kinda looks like Jeepers Creepers in my opinion
He doesn’t look entirely made of tin to me. Looks like a man with armor on.
@@dtb5350 To this day JC is the only humanoid movie monster I think about sometimes. Demonic and alien enough despite appearing human... perhaps as ancient as time but still got consciously updated with humanity each feeding time (the fashion sense!). That said his design is cool af imo. And so does this AI version of Tin Man.
And it looks nothing like the Tin Man as depicted in the original illustrations which are official.
Seriously. If movie Tin Man looked like that, it wouldn’t have been the flying monkeys that terrified my 5-year-old self!
Well the scarecrow sure didn’t fit the still pic on the cover photo
Nor the description in the book.
0:53
I guess AI doesn't know what it means to be made entirely of tin
Normally the description of "tin" really meant tin-plated. Like cans were tin-plated but we still call them "tins." Ditto for a "tin" roof. But also, plating was done because tin doesn't rust, only iron (underneath) rusts.
One slight correction. The Tin woodman is NOT nickel plated during the events of the Wizard of Oz. That happened later during the sequel, The Marvelous Land of Oz, AFTER he becomes Emperor of the Winkies.
Otherwise he would not have rusted in the rain had he been nickel plated.
@@Darth_Chicken I suppose that depends on just how much of him was plated. The Woodman's main point of concern with regards to rust is his joints. On one hand, that would make his joints the key part to plate (not all that hard, since he can be disassembled and re-assembled with no pain.)
On the other hand, to work correctly his joints have to fit together perfectly, and plating could alter the fit by changing the thickness. It'd be doable, but it might require someone with a lot of skill (maybe Nick asked Klu-Klip to leave Munchkinland and visit him on a short vacation to do the job.)
It sort of similar to what happened to Captain Fyter in my stuff. When he had himself plated, to stop looking identical to Nick (actually since Nick was already nickel plated and shiny, he was becoming known as his "dull" cousin!) He had his BODY done in brass (since he's an officer) but the joints are gold plated, so they won't corrode (as he was/is on active duty, he realized there would be more situations where he could be caught in rain without someone to oil him, so he wanted to make sure his joints would NEVER rust up again).
Toto was adorable
But wrong. Baum describes him as "a little black dog, with long silky hair and small black eyes that twinkled merrily on either side of his funny, wee nose."
I know. I nearly reached nirvana from the cuteness. ❤
@@Hinatachan360 Nirvana? Not Oz? ;-)
AI Toto would have been perfect for the movie.
I can see why they took liberties with Scarecrow and the Lion. AI made them look like actual versions.
@@Agg1E91 "Actual versions?" What is that supposed to mean?
AI managed to make a beloved classic movie look like a horror show. Wow ....the tine man would've given me nightmares
Have you read the books? There are some seriously disturbing moments in them straight out of horror. Just look up Mombi for example.
Somebody hasn’t seen *Return to Oz* with Fairuza Balk 😂
Looks like I need to read those Baum novels.
The Patchwork Girl of Oz was one of the best books in the series. It is rather amusing that as the series progressed, more and more characters ended up living in the Emerald City so sometimes when the characters need to go somewhere , a whole gaggle of 20 plus characters would end up going like a class field trip.
@@PungiFungi Would you rather live in some magical realm of wonder or Oklahoma 1931?
...But the original book was illustrated, by W. W. Denslow working closely with L. Frank Baum. We know what the characters are supposed to look like.
This Video is Nonsense and a Waste of Time.
@@elsanto-wk5ux.i realized this unfortunately too late, which was about three seconds in.
Yeah, but the idea was to see how an AI generator would render the descriptions. Plus, Denslow’s illustrations weren’t always the defect-o depictions of the characters, considering all the other artists and illustrators who took on the task after him.
It's Clickbait.
@@geoffreyrichards6079 I think you mean de facto
That road was beautiful
2:26
It was actually a metaphor for the gold standard. This book was about complicated economic issues, but most people didn't get that.
@@milascave2 In irony the term most use of being at the top of their ivory tower comes from this tome lol but yeah, they still do not know the hidden meanings of this text.
I could get behind Glinda looking like that…and take that statement any way you want…
The Wicked Witch was a looker too...
I'll see myself out for that one.
Oh I did it again...
Button eyes for the Scarecrow? He has painted eyes, one larger than the other. He describes his creation in detail in the book.
Correct! Fred Stone, the first actor who ever played the Scarecrow, did his own make-up, and made sure that of the circles he put around his eyes, one of them was always bigger than the other.
Book version of the Wicked Witch reminds me of Daryl Hannah from Kill Bill
Uma Thurman, prehaps?
That's exactly what came to mind. Freakn Elle Driver aka California mountain snake 🐍
That's not what she looked like.
Interesting but seems kind of generic and missing the mark. Tin man fully made out of tin when you see flesh in the ai photo.
yeah because you know the book descriptions are generic
@@elderjose9662 How do you figure?
"Generic and missing the mark" describes all AI "art."
That Depiction of the Tin Man is Completely Inaccurate.
Word!
That was just a real lion and that was just a real scarecrow wtf
Well, the Cowardly Lion IS a real lion in the books, he was never anthropomorphized. He can talk, but so can ALL animals in Oz (yes, that does include Toto). Ditto the Scarecrow, he IS a scarecrow, just one who can walk, talk and so on (we don't find out why until book 15 in The Royal Book of Oz.)
Oh yeah, Dorothy later have to confront Toto why he didn’t say anything when they first visited Oz. Frank Baum did retconned Oz in the later books like how nobody dies in Oz and how all animals can speak.
@PungiFungi Interestingly, Toto doesn't speak much AFTER that conversation in The Road To Oz either. You'd think that once he realized he could, it'd be a useful thing for conveying information. Instead of barking and the old Lassie style, "What is it, boy?", he could just TELL them what he wanted to say.
What else?
@@Sojoboscribe It never came to that. Once the cat (so to speak) was out of the bag, Toto never made it a secret; indeed, in one of the books, he had to talk because he'd somehow lost his growl.
Tin Man looks straight out of Mad Max
"Just walk away...we will not harm you...just walk away."
Barack Obama.
Tim man is the stuff of nightmares. Looks like he has no heart and want to cut out yours.
sounds like a pretty good story for a horror movie 😀
According to be book he was a kind Tin Man. Not a villain or a warrior.
I like the munchkins...waiting patiently for the next LOTR movie.The Tin Man could have his own horror movie franchise.All in all,I don't think '36 would have been ready for this.Great work.
36?
@@MaskedMan66 Did I get the release year wrong?I know it's NineteenThirtysomething...same as Gone With The Wind..'39?
@@BobCrabtree-ev4rz 1939, correct. But this AI really didn't get anyone right except for Dorothy and Glinda; the Lion doesn't really count, because a lion's a lion. 🙂 And they left out the Good Witch of the North.
Okay..but I just went with the movie.And I was wondering about that lion too..
@@BobCrabtree-ev4rz No, the aim of this video (which missed the mark in a lot of ways) was to show the characters as described in the Oz books.
The Wizard is literally just William Burroughs, which feels about right. Return to Oz drew directly from John R. Neill’s illustrations for the sequel books, so most characters are much closer to their descriptions in the books. The Scarecrow and TickTock match Neill’s design exactly, and yes the scarecrow is creepy looking with a painted-on face that doesn’t move.
Tik-Tok. And of course the Scarecrow's face moves. He can smile, frown, look surprised, etc. About the only thing he can't do is close his eyes.
Why not? There were metaphorical references to opium and cocaine in. the movie. I don't know if they were also in the book.
@@milascave2 Poppies were described as dangerous in the book. Neither the book nor the movie made any reference to cocaine.
Yes, I like his illustrations better. And Disney's Return To Oz worked really hard to match the Neill illustrations. (Love that movie.)
So AI’s idea of a witch is Angelina Jolie. I’m not the only one who saw that, right?
🤔 That’s probably why I had an inkling that she was kinda “hot” - in an old, one-eyed, slightly-tattooed kind of way. 😉
And Uncle Henry is Harrison Ford
You say that like it's a bad thing...?
Genuinely expected the witch to just be a floating eye
The book says that Toto bit her in the leg, but that her blood had dried up, and only her magic was keeping her alive.
Dorothy cuter and age appropriate, not a near adult playing a child.
Judy Garland was only 16 when she played that part. Margaret Hamilton was 37. Ray Bolger was 35. Jack Haley was 43. Bert Lahr was 44. Frank Morgan was 49. And though it may surprise you the oldest was Billie Burke, who played Glinda, at the age of 54.
In the original book Dorothy looks about 6 years old, definitely not a teen.
@@davidmccann9811 Dorothy as played by Judy Garland was twelve, only two years older than Dorothy when she and her aunt and uncle finally moved to Oz.
Thumbnail is clickbate the scarecrow doesn't look that creepy in the video.😢
I was going to say the same thing but then I realized the rest of the video was worth it so I didn't. Instead I went down to Edgar's and bought a frozen pizza, Tombstone pizza, pepperoni and a liter of unsweetened iced tea and had some breakfast.
Retuen to Oz does a wonderful job of depeicting the characters like in the origiinal book illustrations.
The second book onward, yes. They really put a lot of effort into that movie, and there were so many characters from many of the books who appeared in the Emerald City Restoration scene. 🙂 Just a handful were the Patchwork Girl, Polychrome, Tommy Kwikstep, the Frogman, Notta Bit More, Cap'n Bill, and the Guardian of the Gates.
@@MaskedMan66 Love that movie. Literally the first book I ever read was Ozma of Oz with the original illustrations. I saw the re-release of the MGM movie in '55 and only started seeing again a few years later when CBS started broadcasting it once a year, but I went on to read a whole lot of the other sequels.
@@johnnehrich9601 I'm MaskedMan66 on my other account. The movie first aired on T.V. in 1954, hosted by Bert Lahr and a little girl named Liza. 🙂 I grew up in the 70's and 80's, and never missed it when it was on. RtO really gets a bad deal from people who only know the MGM movie.
@@peterheimsoth159 Interesting about when it was first on tv.
I love Baum's crazy imagination. Whereas Lewis Carroll has talking animals and flowers, and cards and chess pieces, Baum had inanimate objects sort of come to life, all the while realizing they weren't really alive. Like Tik-tok who "does everything but live." A flying couch is brilliant. And while people ordinarily change their clothes, one character instead changes her head.
@@johnnehrich9601 Cards and chess pieces are also inanimate objects. ;-) Tik-Tok was the only character who wasn't "alive," even though he was a very lively fellow. 🙂
The tin man isn't supposed to have any meat on his bones. He had a series of wood chopping accidents that left his entire body replaced with tin, and he later runs into his flesh body pieced together by magic
All the Baum books had illustrations, and other then maybe Scarecrow, the rest weren't close.
Dorothy is, and what else would the Lion look like?
I appreciate the comparison with the book descriptions! Way to stand out among all the other AI stuff lately!
The Cowardly Lion was literally just a lion.
What else?
I loved what you did! I don't care what anyone says, that scarecrow was too creepy!! Loved it! Wishing you many blessings.
Thank you for watching.
Not especially creepy, but inaccurate; the Scarecrow didn't have button eyes or an open mouth; his features were painted on.
I thought it was cute.
I've been told that the books are more scary and a bit twisted.
I've never read them, but I do know most story books from back when were usually dark and twisted.
All the original books are in the public domain so you can read them, or even a few snatches of them without any problem on Google. The books were more scary - for instance, the witch sends a flock of crows to peck out their eyes, and the scarecrow grabs each in turn and twists its neck to kill it. But Baum, the author, was besieged with letters from children who loved them.
You can also type in the name of the character with "of Oz" into Wikipedia to see the original illustrations.
Auntie Em is Michelle Pfeiffer if she hadn't had work done.
AI is so fascinating. Thanks for all of the work done to make this interesting video. A number ten.
There were numerous illustrations of the characters, made in collaboration with the author, so you might say AI got it wrong as well.
The Thumbnail for this video is nightmare fuel! 😅
The Tin man look hard AH. That design is absolute 🔥
It's absolutely wrong.
It's like the movie made all of the characters the opposite of how they were described in the book.
I actually want this movie so badly. Let's remake this in a new style with some more realism to the book. I think it should be in the style of that Hansel and Grettle movie or in the store of Maleficent or both mixed
That Tin Man picture is all wrong; that's not a man made of metal, that's just a man wearing a metal mask.
The Tin Man is extremely cool. Uncle Henry is a handsome silver fox.
1:28 Even AI generated images cast ScarJo for random characters.
“Exactly” I’m tired of people acting like “ai” should replace our creativity in every way imaginable
I was hoping the wicked witch would be just an eyeball
Lollipop guild
> faces grimacing as if they were holding in a dump.
> convulsive dancing
> present Dorothy with the means to diabetes.
The Wicked Witch looked like Jeri Ryan playing a Mad Max heroine
As for the Wicked Witch of the West in the book having one eye, I'm not sure of whether she was one-eyed in the pirate style (i.e., her empty eye socket being covered by an eyepatch) or if she had a cyclopean eye (i.e., a single large eye in the center of her forehead).
The original illustration shows her with normal eye-sockets but one sort of squinting enough where the eyeball should be.
Damn, these Munchkins are badass!
The video is good at displaying the glaring shortcomings of "AI" that still exist.
The Tin Man looks like he really lost his heart.😂
Vampire diaries book characters ai remade please
Noted.
I was expecting the "one eyed" witch to be a cyclops or some other creepy creature 😂 good thing she isn't
Some artists have drawn her that way.
AI can be pretty good and pretty bad. The music was A+
*likes how the AI made a different VISUAL INTERPRETATION of the Cast Members.
Why does the Wizard look like William S. Burroughs after losing his own copy of Naked Lunch?
It is interesting what AI can do and does I've actually read the series of the books I found in a library when I was a young child,great work 👍✌️💥💯‼️
AI's version of the Yellow Brick Road was literally the exact opposite of "very wide". I've experimented with using AI to create images, and sometimes it just completely ignores certain prompts or doesn't seem to understand them no matter how much tweaking you try to do.
Yo Uncle Henry could get it
Love the song! Thanks for giving them credit.
Music is jamming
Loved Toto and the music!
Thank you for watching.
Wow, the Wizard of Oz looks almost like the old man from the film Thelma and Louise, he is just missing the hat, glasses, and the Amish style beard.
So we just going to ignore that although it’s AI there is actually a person that looks like the generation they pulled off
Well, at least the movie got the Yellow Brick Road right... Kinda.
I can see the AI vision way better than the movie depiction. AI gives more of an accurate detail. Not sure about the Tin man.
No, not really. About the only thing that's right here is Dorothy.
Great video! Thank you!
Thank you for watching
The Tin Man could have come straight out of Return to Oz. The Wizard looks creepy.
very nice
it would be good to see a more faithful adaptation of the book, 1 day
Of as many books as possible... or as a streaming series. Most people only know of the original book, but only remember the movie. Don't get me wrong, I liked some of the changes - ruby slippers, witch with green skin, only coming into contact with Glinda - the Good Witch of the South rather than also meeting the Witch of of the North., the Emerald City actually being emeralds. But I must say, I really do prefer the Wicked Years quadrilogy. It's just too bad the two films are going to based on Broadway musical, which highly deviates from a mature fantasy to family-friendly nonsense.
@@FLQueerLiberal1982 Glinda is the Good Witch of the South in the books, and that whole "Wicked" thing is an abomination.
Agreed that it would be a good thing to see, but it wouldn't look like this.
Well, they got the brick road right.
No one could ever replace Billie Burke as Glinda
I love this interesting comparison between a book and a film in the story. So, I signed up for your channel subscription and see more screen AI. 😂
What about the book illustrations of the Wicked Witch of the West? Use that if book description is thin.
My only issue with this, as I own an original copy of the wizard of OZ, is its illustrated... so that would be considered part of the characters description I believe.
Should have done the book version of the emerald city.
@@bobsmith284 I will try.
That’s going into the new wizard of oz film.
Thank you, that was fun. :>)
Thank you for watching.
The wizard looks like Brooks from Shawshank, wicked witch like Daryl Hannah in Kill Bill 2, munchkin like Brian Cox, and Auntie Em def looks like Michelle Pfeifer 😂
And the ruby slippers were silver.
I would be very interested in watching THAT movie!
1:18 Dude WTF!! he looks like a Friday 13th reject
😂
The AI toto is absolutely adorable
Tin man is sick as hell, This one I understand why he was looking for his heart.
In his book, 'A Barnstormer in Oz', Philip Jose Farmer supposed that Baum had bowdlerized actual events as reported by Dorothy. And the reason that the Tin Woodman could no longer love his Munchkin maid was not that he was missing a _heart_, but a different member.
@@majkus ahahah what is the difference for a simple man.
@@majkus A stupid book.
How was that tin man more accurate? 😂
It isn't at all accurate.
Brilliant!
Tin Man looks like a Twisted Metal contestant. Evil af
Gonna be honest: use this for casting and costume inspiration and I'd watch that movie.
AI is as clueless as those people who program the algorithms
Auntie Em looking like an old lady version of Michelle Pfeiffer
Tin Man looks like he's in the same club as Pinhead
One rare occurrence of the movie designs being impossible to improve upon, regardless of the source material. Both the movie as well as return to Oz are 10/10, especially when taken together as two extremes on an aesthetic spectrum.
The MGM _Wizard_ took its cues from W.W. Denslow's character designs in the first book, and RtO took inspiration from John R. Neill's work in the succeeding books.
The scarecrow in the thumbnail is terrifying! Why isn’t he in the video? Thanks!
Where was the part that said the tin man was black?
Your Tin Woodman is completely off - looks like a bad cyborg. The Wicked Witch of the West in the book is said to be very old, that all her blood had dried up years ago, and she kept herself alive using her magic. So her appearance should probably be more like a mummy, with grayish skin.
Almost right; it didn't say that her magic had kept her alive. I think more likely it was just sheer cussedness. 🙂
@@MaskedMan66 If all the blood was drained from your body do you really think cussedness - or to put it more simply - being annoying and nasty would allow you to continue to be alive? If that were the case there would be a lot of corpse walking our streets today. However, if you were a witch - with an extensive knowledge of magic you would probably use that to ensue your continued existence. Oh, and if you mean cussed as a curse that kept her from death - that would still be magic.
@@donaldabbott8663 Dude, we're talking about a *fantasy tale* set in a land where a man can get chopped up and continue to live as a tin shell. Magic didn't keep Nick Chopper alive, so there's no reason to think it kept the Wicked Witches alive.
@@MaskedMan66 That's where you are wrong. In the book "The Tin Woodman of Oz" Baum wrote that the Land of Oz had once been an ordinary land cut off from the rest of the world by a deadly desert. But the Fairy Queen Lurline enchanted the Land of Oz making it a magic-land. A place where magic can allow for a living scarecrow and a living man made out of tin. It was the Fairy Queen's enchantment that created the magic that bring them to life or allows them to live even after loosing all their blood. A witch would know how to use this magic even better then ordinary inhabitants of Oz. As an author and illustrator of six Oz books, one Oz graphic novel, and an online Oz cartoon I usually know what I'm talking about.
@@donaldabbott8663 A Witch using fairy magic? Don't kid yourself. The only Witch able to do that is Glinda, and that's because she's a fairy as well.
Uncle Henry definitely improved!
0:43 Elle Driver from Kill Bill, is that you?
I want to see THAT movie.
So AI ignores the Denslow illustrations that accompanied the original book? All the more reason not to trust AI.
The literal lion 💀
Amazing
JK Simmons as a munchkin
Toto is beyond fregging adorable. Oh I wanna cover his lil faces with kisses. 💗💗💗💗
Dorothy, Lion and Glinda look pretty close to the books but the others are pretty far off
i would loved to see this AI's version of Dorothy's gal pal (Ozma)