i sold my fuji camera and brought g5xii before watching your video, now i feel comfortable to make a good division for my daily photography camera. i like your point " i don't need 200mm of sony and why sony don't put touch screen" , now is 2019, really don't know why sony still use old monitor.
Outstanding! I much appreciate the detailed attention to the photography aspect of these two cameras. The depth of coverage of both was great. I am now a subscriber!
Finally found a video for the g5x mkii not about videos! And honestly it’s the best comparison video I’ve seen regarding photography for these two cameras. Thanks for this.
Excellent review! Exactly the details I'm looking for. Low light shots are a big consideration for me, even with just taking vacation photos. The zoom on the Sony is appealing, but I was leaning toward the Canon because of the fast lens. This seals the deal for Canon. Thanks so much.
Awesome review! I am a global traveler who wanted a compact camera to bring with me on my trips. The Canon G5X Mark ii has been just that. Everything you shared during your comparison video is validated by my user experience. I have found jpeg performance right out of my camera amazing in both low light and normal daylight shooting conditions. Macro performance is outstanding as is bokeh. While not an inexpensive p/s camera at $899, the image and build quality plus EVF and zoom focal length made this the choice for me over the G7X iii (more for video vloggers). Keep up the excellent high quality reviews!
This is a very good review from a photography perspective. I'm currently trying to decide which of these 2 to buy. I get what you are saying re, canon colors, faster lens, better bokeh but I still think autofocus trumps it all. Colors can be adjusted in software, 1 stop of aperature will not make a huge difference in bokeh....I'd suggest that the bokeh due to the longer focal length on the sony would equal the bokeh of the canon. The ability to shoot at a lower iso on the canon due to the faster lens......its only 1 stop and noise can be effectively removed in software such as topaz denoise or a myriad of other photo editing software. Therefore, personally I don't see the advantages that the canon has. I guess if you were not willing to process your photos then sure, it might have a slight advantage but anyone who is actually into photography has no issues tweeking a raw file. Focus accuracy however cannot be corrected and an out of focus shot is basically useless. Anyway this is just my personal opinion and I respect that you have a different opinion. I did really enjoy your video!
I appreciate your video, real world. Tough decision regarding which one to buy, both nice cameras. Some feedback here...1- Regarding the touch screens they are all hard to see in bright skies so I can never relying on them. 2- Also the shallow depth of field can be achieved by moving back and using the zoom to achieve the shallow depth of foiled. F1.8 vs. 2.8 basically 1-stop. I shot with a 3.5 for 12 years and you learn how to push and control your shutter and iso. The processors are both excellent. 3- Focus sped is a bigger deal to me much more so than the faster lens on the Canon. You can miss way too many shots with out of focus images or not realize this until after you get home. So for me the focus trumps the faster lense. 4- Also regarding color, I believe that becomes a bit of a subjective analysis and in reality post processing can usually achieve whatever desired result you are looking for. 5- I wholeheartedly agree with the hand feel of the small Sony which is not ergonomic. The Canon feels more natural to me. The smaller size of the Sony makes a true pocket camera very convenient and the Cannon is surely small enough for baggy cargo or a small waist belt. 6- If you are traveling I think the overall flexibility of the video and 200 zoom in the Sony deliver options the Canon does not. 7- Operating menus ... in my experience you learn them and they become second nature. But easier is better. 8- Last but not least price. If you spending $900. but wanted a $1200 camera get the $1200 camera you will never look back over $300. Whichever camera you buy they will both create great images in a very very convent package.
Finally!! and i mean finally!!! a review that focuses solely on the photographic features of two cameras rather than their video capabilities!!!! As a enthusiast photographer i hardly care about all those great video features!!! THANK YOU!!!
For those of you who are thinking of buying the Sony RX100-7, I have one and my thing is photos and not video, Sony make a rubberized grip that fits on the right-side of the camera, and I highly recommend it.
THANK YOU. The G5X has caught my attention recently and i cant find reviews about how good it does in terms of photography. You did sir and i cant thank you enough!
Very late to this party. I have the Canon. My shooting buddy has the Sony. We are both stills shooters. We are both happy with our choices, because we bought them for different purposes. He wanted a shirt-pocket camera for outdoor use, including detail shots. Mine is for indoor shooting without flash in addition to general outdoor shooting, so I needed the faster lens, but I don't need more reach than 100mm (FF=). So both our choices were good fits for our needs. It's not about Canon vs Sony. It's about choosing cameras as tools. Which one is better? That's the wrong question. The question is which one is the better fit for the job you're asking it to perform.
Thank you very much, Bobby. You did an excellent job comparing both cameras. Any of them has some good characteristics better than the other and now I have the opportunity to choose with much better information than before. Thanks again for your help in the process of making the right decision.
Had both and settled on the Cannon as I wanted best photo management, rather than video. Plus the Canon menus with touchscreen outdoes the Sony by a long way, as well as having the much better feel in the hand. Can’t understand why Sony do not add a handgrip as standard. Very, very pleased with the Canon G5 X Mkii. Great camera, coupled with the SX740 HS for everyday carry. And this from a long time Panasonic fan.
166 / 5000 Výsledky překladu Hi sir, your video has been very instructive and I commend you as a creator. I am interested in buying the Canon G5x mark II. Do you think I'll do well to buy it? Thank you in advance, sir. Robi
That's the comparison I was looking for, thanks a bunch! Just unfortunate you missed the focus using the G5 in the beginning of the video. Personally, I am a Fuji shooter, but when I got the G5 in my hands, I felt that superior build quality and I am now seriously considering buying it
Thanks. G5II vs RX100VII vs ZS200/TZ200 (C-Lux) vs G7III Hope 2021 will not kill this segment, specially with the Pandemic that looks like like a Pandora Box. Compact
Thanks for a frank and useful review, the summary was the best I have seen...actually telling us what each cameras strength is. Very rare these days to get people so 'to the point'.
For indoor shooting, the faster lens of the Canon G5X is superior, but the Sony RX100 VII is a better option outdoors in bright light since there's more length. All in all, if you shoot stills, you're better off with Canon, if you shoot fast moving subjects, Sony has superior autofocus. I prefer the grip on the Canon and the menu system as well.
Thanks for the review, which would be better for taking photos of Pets, Animals which as you know are always moving in both photo and video? I am thinking the Sony? or any other pocket-able compact camera that anyone could suggest would be great thanks! I read that the Ricoh camera is great but there is no flash and not sure if it will take good shots of Animals.
One thing I think every reviewer should mention, that irregardless of the minor differences in detail, if you own a modern Sony, or canon, go with the respective point and shoot hands down. If you make any presets for keeping an Instagram feed consistent, or you like your photos to be processed a certain way, having a camera with identical color science to your apsc or full frame saves a ton of time editing. If you own an a7iii buying a canon would be a pain to use your own presets. If you own an Eos r buying an RX would be dumb. Sticking with a consistent workflow is far more valuable than an extra stop of light, or extra zoom. A lot of the issues and discrepancies between the two regarding color can be fixed in post given enough time if your manually editing.
Got a new DSLR 90D that shoots 4k. The files were massive and my 'system/ software' was outdated. Got a brand spanking new Powerspec computer and now shoot video in 1080p/30. I shoot landscape and lately have been taking mostly photo's with the old G16 RAW A/P. Pictures are more fun for me than video other than those super zoom pans from miles away which requires the heavy stuff. As I'm getting OLD the compact cameras are really intriguing me. The G16 got me hooked.
@@TECH360TVWrong! The most noticeable difference when you get the two cameras in your hand is the change in build materials used for the G5 X Mark II, with the camera body and lens ring being plastic, rather than the metal found on the original G5 X ...
Great review and comparison, i'm planning to buy ine of them, i am a professional photographer...and for this i think the Canon concept is the most roght for me. The lens, more bright and so more creamy background then Sony images is for me the mean that let me prefer the Gx5 mk ii, it seems built for PHOTOGRAPHY, Sony for all round. Thanks
Maybe you should have done the comparison using the Sony RX100VA. It’s got a 24-70/f1.8~2.8 lens. I have the RX100VI and on import into Lr my images aren’t saturated like yours. Maybe you needed to check the import settings. On DPReview, most comment on Sony’s “Blue” cast vs Canon’s “Warm” skin tones. Seems your finding are the reverse.
The video was about the latest cameras from each company that came out roughly at the same time. Import settings were per as normal. I found the Canon to have a more pleasing color out of the two. This however was based on my monitor settings and calibration which can be different from others
Thank you so very much for the review Bobby. I recently bought the Panasonic ZS100 camera for photography, not video. The image quality and build quality are just not up to par on this camera. I am returning it and have been looking at both these exact cameras for consideration as a replacement. Since I only shoot photography and have no need for video or 4k, I could not appreciate your video more. The timing on finding this video could not have been more perfect. Thank you so much for you views on photography, my hobby and passion.
You can fine tune the white balance defaults on the sony, so you could decrease the magenta and yellow. The pop up 1 step viewfinder that turns the camera on and off is great for street photography. I added a fake leather $8 camera case. The bottom part with a bulge on the right side adds a grip to the camera. You can tweak the rx100vii to overcome the issues you mention, but you can’t improve the AF performance of the canon.
Canon has issued an update since to help on autofocus from what I understand. Yes there are tweaks and things you can do, but many buyers of these cameras buy to point and shoot. Some like yourself are very knowledgeable about tweaks and accessories, but I’m comparing out of the box and as is.
@@TECH360TV Thank you - although if someone spends 1200 USD on a RX100M7, I think they may want more than just a point and shoot. I considered the Canon, although I have been shooting Sony in recent years. The Sony AF, especially continuous EyeAF, is a true game-changer and allows me to take photos if perfect focus that was not possible before. I feel the RX100M7 is very expensive, and I am not wealthy, but it is definitely worth the extra cost compared to the Canon. The 1 step EVF instantly on allows me to not miss the moment. These 2 factors are worth the price difference. I sold the RX100 M3 as the pop-up EVF was 2 steps and AF-C was always hunting a little. These features really help me take photos. The phase-detect AF is great, and if I photograph people the eyes are always in focus without having to fiddle with the 4-way controller. Color rendering could have to do also on how Adobe interprets the RAW files, and someone could create an import preset that tweaks the colors. Or use a Neutral color profile, instead of Standard and lower contrast/saturation for JPGs or video
@@TECH360TV even by today (13 december 2022) the canon g5xii has still severe focussing issues, especially when it comes to smaller thing against bright light, i've almost tossed it against a wall many times because i missed the moment with this cam. other than that i prefer it over the rx100vii, the colors are just way better and the bokeh too.
Thanks, an objective and balanced review. I bought the Canon and agree with the picture quality. I do Plogging (photos of friends, family, etc... and places on my travels) and don't want to carry a ton of equipment. Nice bright, colourful photos with the Canon.
THIS IS LITERALLY THE ONLY REVIEW TALKING ABOUT PHOTO. I know vlogging is the new craze but giving the photographers perspective is a good way to stand out from the pack. Great job guys!
UPDATE: I bought one and it’s an incredibly capable camera. Even at 20x digital hybrid optical/zoom the picture quality is unmatched for a 1 inch sensor. Strongly recommend it!
Thanks man. I was beginning to think all reviews of these cameras were just about video. Biggest issue for me is that the Sony is £300 more expensive here in the UK. Need to check them out in the flesh but definitely leaning on the Gx5ii.
Well, cough, the Canon might do 20 fps ... if you don't mind focus. If the subject is moving ... try to get 20 fps out of the Canon ... and look at the shots it took to check how many are in focus and how many are not. So you can take 20 fps of a still subject (why would you?) or 20fps of someone moving horizontally to your cam. Outside of that ... DOF is a big plus for the Canon but if I want to take serious photos where object/background separation matters, I'll go full frame with a nice 1.4 lens. For the point and shoot events, DoF matters less (to me) than capturing the moment. And that's where the Canon tends to hunt for focus while the Sony just takes an in-focus image. If people are of interest - face detection and adjusting lighting to face is where Canon still struggles as is painfully evident in the beginning of the video. The ND filter is nice if you do video in broad daylight but you can clip one onto the Sony as well. Thankfully the filters are not that expensive with this small lens diameter. The biggest downside of the Sony is the price and the fact that it is as slippery as an eel. And please don't blame Sony for the initial interpretation of the RAWs by Lightroom. Capture one does a different job on those. So you can easily import all RAWs with an adjusted initial profile and fix that. This is something Adobe does to all Sony cameras. So you fix this ONCE and import all images with the profile. You seem to believe that the "images have this reddish hue to it". Not so. Lightroom interprets them to have it. Capture One doesn't. But you can override the terrible default profile in Lightroom and have it use a decent one. And it is a bit of a shame that you do RAW but decide to not see the dynamic range the cameras offer. There's quite a bit of a difference regarding the shadow regions.
Great video. Looking for a good compact camera to take with me everyday. I got down to these two in choice but I mainly take photos early morning or late evening due to work and the Canon 1.8 caught my attention, but review sites mainly tell me the Sony is king always due to video. I only shoot stills and I am used to contrast AF due to my M43 cameras. Really enjoyed your style of review and I think I will order a Canon.
One thing I didn't hear mentioned which is something to point out. For those who prefer a faster lens and don't need the 200mm in the Sony...Most of the earlier iterations of the RX100 are still available as new cameras which is why I bought the RX100 VA with the 1.8 to 2.8 equivalent 24-70mm lens and many of the other features of the VII. With Sony's excellent Clear Image Zoom option turned on, it gets out to about 135mm field of view when that might be needed. Oh, and the price points are less too!
I said for photography I’m more inclined towards the Canon. If you want a camera that does both very well then Sony is the camera for you. Sorry but I didn’t like the colors that camera out of the Sony and I felt the ND filter inside the Canon allows you to shoot wide open I. Bright daylight and get some nice depth of field. Sony focuses more on zoom and video for this camera and they exceed where there put their focus.
@@TECH360TV Sorry, but having worked in marketing, i know how important it is to use inflection and tone, to emphasise points you want to stand out. You may be doing it unconsciously, but it is noticeable. Otherwise, nice video. 🙂
While I thank you for the compliment on the video and appreciate you taking the time to comment, there is no biased here nor an incentive to like one brand over the other. I liked the Canon for the reasons mentioned above and also ergonomics. Does Sony have better tech in the camera? Yes but that doesn’t mean it’s a better camera for photography.
Many thanks for this interesting and cool comparison. I would like to go for the Canon. Unfortunately it isn't available anymore in Europe. Nobody knows why.
Thank you very much. I've been waiting for something like this for months. Thank you for reviewing photography!!!! It's all about video and filming and vlogging these days. Best review I have seen so far between these two cameras. And actually, I Just made my decision on which one to buy. PHOTOGRAPHY!!!! Gald someone remembered it!
i am currently choosing mainly between these two cameras. my nikon p300 series was my go to for over ten years but the last (P340) died recently and nikon doesn't make them or anything like it anymore. I am not a vlogger and any video i shoot is purely incidental; I am a photographer, an old-school 35 mm film one. Yes getting shots in focus quickly is important, and I hear the sony is superior at that. but what I also need is the ability to change certain key settings -- iso, exposure compensation, aperture, shutter speed, white balance, aspect ration, monochrome -- quickly and easily, without digging through mountains of menus. and I need something pocketable. I've taken some great interiors at locations like the Metropolitan Opera House, you need a wide aperture. I don't like the Sony's red hue in several of the photo examples -- it's why I select neutral over vivid, why i shot with ektachrome for critical work. I'm leaning toward the canon.
For me, top notch AF performance is even more important when working with small viewfinders and screens. I own a mark iii sony, and will keep it for the slightly faster lens. But I hope to acquire the mark vii at some point for the vastly improved focusing ability and zoom range. As far as the color, Sony does give you a tool to adjust the picture profile, if you prefer the cooler look.
Thank you, I’ve always found canon to be great image quality I’ve always been a fan of canon. Sony colors and stuff aren’t always the best out of the box, but being a point and shoot, I would think most people would want the fast good auto focus to get the shot in focus and take the picture every time. A bird in the hand is better than two in the bush... an in focus picture that has slightly off colors is better than missing the moment completely fiddling with the focus or getting a bunch of blurry out of focus pictures. Last vacation I was on I had the EOS M50 and took like 650+ pictures, it nailed the focus every single time if Canon gave better focus on these I would be all over it!
Interesting review - I was a faithful Canon G-series user from the original G1 and several others (only the models with fully articulated screens) ending with the G12, now with a Sony RX100. For me the outstanding autofocus and extra reach swung the decision towards the Sony. But if you want a brighter lens and don't need the extra reach, the GX5 II or the Sony RX100VA are good choices. In case any viewer is worried by the RX100's lack of grip (as mentioned in the video), you can buy the Sony AGR2 grip for very little money. It's easy to install and for me that fixed the problem.
1:15 I don't know where Canon is focusing! I had the same issue with original G7X and I was hoping that Canon give the new G7X & G5X a better and more reliable auto focus capability !
Easily the best review and comparison I've seen. I'm not interested in vlogging or video. I was leaning the Canon your video has helped me make my decision the G5x ll it is! Thank you.
I got the Sony rx100vII for Christmas I've been taken photos with it everyday since and idk taken photos in the house with lower light makes my photo not clear n sharp n if I bump up the iso I dont want it noise and even shooting outside to me the Sony photo quality is not good so I'm going to best buy today to mess around with the cannon try it out and see! My camera I had was 6yrs old Sony hx50v 30x zoom pocket camera the sony rx100vII is a huge step up but I want start getting into portraits and being able to have a 1.8 instead of 2.8 for lower lighting so I dont have to drop my shutter or raise my iso while taken photos in a house will help I'd think? But I mainly do wildlife and landscape photography so I'm not really sure If the cannon can keep up but like i said it has to be better than my 6yr old Sony hx50v! I would really like your thoughts if I should return the Sony rx100vII or keep it
I think try both but if you need it to capture wildlife especially moving animals the Sony could be the better option. Having a faster aperture is very nice though and that will help in lower light situations. It’s a toss up in your case to be honest. Go with what you feel more comfortable with
Thanks for the review. I struggle with the F1.8 vs 2.8 on the Sony. I have a Canon F2.0 now, a very old S95, but I like it. You have discussed, like many have, the Sony focus, being great. The canon, not quite as good, but "OK". I liked that you commented on the Sony 200mm - not really needed in a pocket camera and anyone buying will trade off the F1.8 Canon vs the 200mm of the Sony - but I think I'll go with the Canon and work around the non-instant focus. If Sony had the F1.8, and out to 100mm, (or 200 as it is now), I'd pay the extra and get the Sony. Sure, crank up the ISO but then noise starts to become an issue. I think the 1" sensors will be a major improvement over the S95, and video quality will be better on either camera, so I'm ahead of the game on both these points too.
This is the review I have been waiting for. I don't give a darn about video..for that I can use my phone. I'm pretty much sold on the Canon here for PHOTOGRAPHY, and I can live with a little slower auto focus etc. My issue is I am a current owner of the Panasonic LX100II. I actually love that camera and I'm almost sure? it will beat both the RX100 and G5XII for pure image quality, low noise, less chromatic aberration that I have seen in many GX5II samples on the net, and creamy bokeh etc. Size wise I don't think it's all that more large than the G5XII Yup no flip screen..so adios to selfies...don't care..However I do like the longer zoom on the G5XII and my issue with the LX100II is, dust on the sensor. My first one I returned as within one day I saw a couple dust spots. So the second one has been great but I have to be SO ultra careful with it...blowing dust off the lens EVERY time I use it..or actually lol, I walk around with a tiny piece of that blue painter's tape, and dab the lens barrel to get any tiny dust it may have off before shutting it off. I wonder if you have tried the LX100II? but..as I say I have to be so careful with it "I am not enjoying using it so much" Image quality though I do think the LX100 is a winner on pure image quality vs the Sony AND Canon? But having to be so careful using it meh??..hence I may get the Canon...GREAT review!!!
Excellent, thanks. Skin tones, hue and lens flare test in particular. Both are about €1000 (!) on ebay and MPB now, apparently no one can make any money on high-end compacts anymore and the rest of the world are using their phones or lugging mirrorless kits around. To my surprise G5 X II comes out on top on my pocket-hybrid-2024 list. 120mm 1.8-2.8m EVF, Live ND, SOOC color science, OIS and EIS, 120fps (no audio, AF or IS though), USB charging, USB power for timelapse and streaming, 3 slots for user picture profiles (plenty of good 3rd party ones around, free or paid). I've tested a TZ100 (25-250mm) and a ZV-1 and agree that 120mm is sufficient and the 75-120mm range is very nice to have. Sony didn't add touch menus until ZV-1 M2 in 2023 AFAIK. If you're still doing camera reviews I'll suggest adding a gloves-on segment to see how it handles using physical controls only.
I don't know... I see photographs on Flickr and Instagram and the photos with the Sony RX100 M7 look more interesting and closer to aps-c while the G5X mark II photos look closer to a compact camera. It could be that the Sony is purchased by more professional photographers that edit and compose more carefully. And the bright lens in the Canon cannot blur as much as my ancient Sigmq DP2 which seems to have nicer colors than both despite being so cumbersome to use.
For the record, the canon is 120mm not 100mm , it was the old G5X Mk1 / G7X series which top out at 100mm .. not a lot fo difference I know but a usable extra
The answer to the touchscreen question: a camera you take on hikes is more likely to fall. Once the touchscreen is broke, the camera is unusable. Happened to me on the sony tx-30. I got the lumix ft4 afterwards: it is indeed annoying to go through the menus, but it s safer when traveling with it. I guess sony wanted to avoid such issues with the rx100 vii.
Nice review, which brings me to wonder... Can you change a camera sensor for a better one ? No. Can you shift colours of a RAW-file picture via a software ? Yes. Can you change the AF system that's within a specific camera ? No. Can you tweak the exposure of a RAW-file picture via a software ? Yes. Can you change the lens of such a camera for one that has less aberrations and distorsion ? No. Can you use a tripod (or any kind of "stabilizer") when you're about to snap an image ? Yes. So...
Each of these devices has its own strengths when it comes to photography. It’s capable of capturing high-quality photos and has a good autofocus system. The Lumix TZ200 is a dedicated camera with a ” sensor and a 24-360mm equivalent lens, offering a versatile zoom range. However, its lens quality isn’t very consistent.
If you prioritize portability and high-speed performance, you might lean towards the RX100 VII. If you prefer a wider aperture and better handling, G5X Mark II might be your choice. If a longer zoom range is important to you, then the Lumix TZ200 could be the best fit.
What about G1X Mk3 vs Sony RX100 VII? I sold my RX100 V due to its ergonomics, and one of the options I am considering is Canon G1X mk3 (together with G5X mk2 and Panasonic LX100 mk2)...
I intended to buy Sony rx100m5 , after watching your clip I have changed - So now I will buy canon g5xm2 or g7xm3 because I only take photos and like the color of canon . Thanks !
Thank you, I'm tired of everyone just focus on the video quality, most of us still want to take more pictures than vlogging.
Thanks. Wanted to showcase a different side to the cameras
I like video though :)
every time i look back at a photo, i wish it was a video :)
canon m50 will be better for you if you want more of that
@@thefowlyetti2 ioomjnnb
.
finally a review on these cameras talking about photography, not vlogging
Jep!!
Been looking for a review that focused on the photography and not on the video quality of these cameras! Great review! Thanks for comparing the two.
Best review on the internet ... and photography focused too! I salute you sir 😀
Thank you sir
i sold my fuji camera and brought g5xii before watching your video, now i feel comfortable to make a good division for my daily photography camera.
i like your point " i don't need 200mm of sony and why sony don't put touch screen" , now is 2019, really don't know why sony still use old monitor.
Ross Curtice cut cost, increase margin :P
Outstanding! I much appreciate the detailed attention to the photography aspect of these two cameras. The depth of coverage of both was great. I am now a subscriber!
Finally found a video for the g5x mkii not about videos! And honestly it’s the best comparison video I’ve seen regarding photography for these two cameras. Thanks for this.
This is exactly the review we wanted!
Glad it helped. Thanks for watching
Excellent review! Exactly the details I'm looking for. Low light shots are a big consideration for me, even with just taking vacation photos. The zoom on the Sony is appealing, but I was leaning toward the Canon because of the fast lens. This seals the deal for Canon. Thanks so much.
Watching this in 2024, I think it is such a shame that there are no successors to these cameras... I own my Sony RX100-VI and absolutely love it.
Finally, a review from photography side. Thank you!
Most welcome. Thanks for watching
TECH360.TV thank you from me too - it was the photography element that I had questions about, and you answered them all. Super grateful 👊👍👊
Awesome review! I am a global traveler who wanted a compact camera to bring with me on my trips. The Canon G5X Mark ii has been just that. Everything you shared during your comparison video is validated by my user experience. I have found jpeg performance right out of my camera amazing in both low light and normal daylight shooting conditions. Macro performance is outstanding as is bokeh. While not an inexpensive p/s camera at $899, the image and build quality plus EVF and zoom focal length made this the choice for me over the G7X iii (more for video vloggers). Keep up the excellent high quality reviews!
Thanks for watching! I prefer it over the G7X as well. Your kind words are very much appreciated.
TECH360.TV my pleasure!
This is a very good review from a photography perspective. I'm currently trying to decide which of these 2 to buy. I get what you are saying re, canon colors, faster lens, better bokeh but I still think autofocus trumps it all. Colors can be adjusted in software, 1 stop of aperature will not make a huge difference in bokeh....I'd suggest that the bokeh due to the longer focal length on the sony would equal the bokeh of the canon. The ability to shoot at a lower iso on the canon due to the faster lens......its only 1 stop and noise can be effectively removed in software such as topaz denoise or a myriad of other photo editing software. Therefore, personally I don't see the advantages that the canon has. I guess if you were not willing to process your photos then sure, it might have a slight advantage but anyone who is actually into photography has no issues tweeking a raw file. Focus accuracy however cannot be corrected and an out of focus shot is basically useless. Anyway this is just my personal opinion and I respect that you have a different opinion. I did really enjoy your video!
I appreciate your video, real world. Tough decision regarding which one to buy, both nice cameras. Some feedback here...1- Regarding the touch screens they are all hard to see in bright skies so I can never relying on them. 2- Also the shallow depth of field can be achieved by moving back and using the zoom to achieve the shallow depth of foiled. F1.8 vs. 2.8 basically 1-stop. I shot with a 3.5 for 12 years and you learn how to push and control your shutter and iso. The processors are both excellent. 3- Focus sped is a bigger deal to me much more so than the faster lens on the Canon. You can miss way too many shots with out of focus images or not realize this until after you get home. So for me the focus trumps the faster lense. 4- Also regarding color, I believe that becomes a bit of a subjective analysis and in reality post processing can usually achieve whatever desired result you are looking for. 5- I wholeheartedly agree with the hand feel of the small Sony which is not ergonomic. The Canon feels more natural to me. The smaller size of the Sony makes a true pocket camera very convenient and the Cannon is surely small enough for baggy cargo or a small waist belt.
6- If you are traveling I think the overall flexibility of the video and 200 zoom in the Sony deliver options the Canon does not.
7- Operating menus ... in my experience you learn them and they become second nature. But easier is better.
8- Last but not least price. If you spending $900. but wanted a $1200 camera get the $1200 camera you will never look back over $300.
Whichever camera you buy they will both create great images in a very very convent package.
Finally!! and i mean finally!!! a review that focuses solely on the photographic features of two cameras rather than their video capabilities!!!! As a enthusiast photographer i hardly care about all those great video features!!! THANK YOU!!!
You are most welcome! Thanks for watching:)
For those of you who are thinking of buying the Sony RX100-7, I have one and my thing is photos and not video, Sony make a rubberized grip that fits on the right-side of the camera, and I highly recommend it.
THANK YOU. The G5X has caught my attention recently and i cant find reviews about how good it does in terms of photography. You did sir and i cant thank you enough!
Glad the video helped and thanks for watching
Makes a pleasant change finding a review not mainly concerned with producing a review.
That's what i needed to make my decision about which camera should i buy for pictures not videos. Thank you.😊
Thanks. Glad to be of help! :))
Very late to this party. I have the Canon. My shooting buddy has the Sony. We are both stills shooters. We are both happy with our choices, because we bought them for different purposes. He wanted a shirt-pocket camera for outdoor use, including detail shots. Mine is for indoor shooting without flash in addition to general outdoor shooting, so I needed the faster lens, but I don't need more reach than 100mm (FF=). So both our choices were good fits for our needs. It's not about Canon vs Sony. It's about choosing cameras as tools. Which one is better? That's the wrong question. The question is which one is the better fit for the job you're asking it to perform.
Thank you very much, Bobby. You did an excellent job comparing both cameras. Any of them has some good characteristics better than the other and now I have the opportunity to choose with much better information than before. Thanks again for your help in the process of making the right decision.
Thanks for watching
I thought the canon has a focal range of 24-120? Did I miss something?
Which viewfinder is best for spectacle wearers please,especially regards to eye relief,it’s really important to me.
Prob Canon but need to try in person
@@TECH360TV
Thanks for reply.
Had both and settled on the Cannon as I wanted best photo management, rather than video. Plus the Canon menus with touchscreen outdoes the Sony by a long way, as well as having the much better feel in the hand. Can’t understand why Sony do not add a handgrip as standard. Very, very pleased with the Canon G5 X Mkii. Great camera, coupled with the SX740 HS for everyday carry. And this from a long time Panasonic fan.
Thanks man! Finally someone talks about still photography, best comparison of these too!
166 / 5000
Výsledky překladu
Hi sir, your video has been very instructive and I commend you as a creator. I am interested in buying the Canon G5x mark II. Do you think I'll do well to buy it? Thank you in advance, sir. Robi
This video is a couple years old. Might be good to see what else is out there
That's the comparison I was looking for, thanks a bunch! Just unfortunate you missed the focus using the G5 in the beginning of the video. Personally, I am a Fuji shooter, but when I got the G5 in my hands, I felt that superior build quality and I am now seriously considering buying it
Thanks for watching
Thanks.
G5II vs RX100VII vs ZS200/TZ200 (C-Lux) vs G7III
Hope 2021 will not kill this segment, specially with the Pandemic that looks like like a Pandora Box.
Compact
Thanks for the video. I dislike how most of the videos on cameras right now focus on video. I really needed the photo review.
Thanks for watching
great review! I was looking for this for the whole evening !
Can you send videos straight to your phone?
I don't know who that guy is but he seems like he could play an awesome bad guy in a movie
Thanks I think 😂😂
2:41 May I know what camera and lens are used to shot this portion of the video? The colour is looking so good to my eyes.
Leica D Lux 7 or Cannon G5x, I can get both at the same price but can't decide?!? Leica seems a bit large but does have a larger sensor....
D Lux 7
@@TECH360TV That's what I was thinking, £500 is such a good price for it and the g5x is £570 🤷♂️
Agree. Go with the leica. Nice colors and street cred 😊
@@TECH360TV Thanks, was torn between these two till I saw the cheap Leica. Brilliant video by the way!
Great video mate. I am not a vlogger, I just want to take nice photos. Greetings from Australia, and thanks for your effort.
Thanks for watching
Резюме. Якщо берете камеру для *Ф̲̲О̲̲Т̲̲О̲̲* - цікавіший *C̲̲A̲̲N̲̲O̲̲N̲̲.*
Якщо берете камеру для *В̲̲І̲̲Д̲̲Е̲̲О̲̲* - цікавіша *S̲̲O̲̲N̲̲Y̲̲.*
Such a great review, not overly partial or anything. Thanks a ton
My pleasure. Thanks for the compliment
I feel it is a pity you were so biased toward the Canon before you did the comparison
No. I said for overall video and photography go Sony, but if it’s strictly photography Canon
Awesome video comparing the photo quality.
Thanks for watching.
thank you for the review....but next time, please add a low light! ok, skip the vlogging and focus on the photography, but why no low light?
Thanks for a frank and useful review, the summary was the best I have seen...actually telling us what each cameras strength is. Very rare these days to get people so 'to the point'.
Thanks for watching and your kind words
Do any of these point & shoots have “second curtain” or “slow flash synch” settings?
(great review BTW)
Thanks. Need to check on that
Thanks. Great video. BTW the Canon lens goes to 120mm, not 100mm.
You mentioned that the Canon focal length was 24-100mm. It's actually 24-120mm
Yes it was a mistake.
For indoor shooting, the faster lens of the Canon G5X is superior, but the Sony RX100 VII is a better option outdoors in bright light since there's more length. All in all, if you shoot stills, you're better off with Canon, if you shoot fast moving subjects, Sony has superior autofocus. I prefer the grip on the Canon and the menu system as well.
there’s a canon live chat available if anyone has any questions imaging.chat
there’s a canon live chat available if anyone has any questions imaging.chat
Sony seems much better
Thank U Bobby for the video, finally I made my decision wich camera to choose. But still I'd like to know ur opinion about canon g7x mark iii?
What are you using the camera for
@@TECH360TV I am interested in pictures only, a compact camera for travelling
Ok check out this channel next week
That 200 is a must, 200mm isn't as far as I thought it would be and it's kinda clutch.
Thanks for the review, which would be better for taking photos of Pets, Animals which as you know are always moving in both photo and video? I am thinking the Sony? or any other pocket-able compact camera that anyone could suggest would be great thanks! I read that the Ricoh camera is great but there is no flash and not sure if it will take good shots of Animals.
Sony’s AF is faster so I would go with that.
@@TECH360TV Thank you, that is what I thought but good to have confirmation :)
@@TECH360TV What SD card would you recommend?
Sony Tough Card UHS II 299MB write speed
One thing I think every reviewer should mention, that irregardless of the minor differences in detail, if you own a modern Sony, or canon, go with the respective point and shoot hands down. If you make any presets for keeping an Instagram feed consistent, or you like your photos to be processed a certain way, having a camera with identical color science to your apsc or full frame saves a ton of time editing. If you own an a7iii buying a canon would be a pain to use your own presets. If you own an Eos r buying an RX would be dumb. Sticking with a consistent workflow is far more valuable than an extra stop of light, or extra zoom. A lot of the issues and discrepancies between the two regarding color can be fixed in post given enough time if your manually editing.
The elephant in the room is the price. $1300 for the Sony, $850 for the Canon.
Thanks.. I was hesitant about Sony RX100 vii and Canon G5X II... Finally I decided to purchase the Canon... Thanks again.
Got a new DSLR 90D that shoots 4k. The files were massive and my 'system/ software' was outdated. Got a brand spanking new Powerspec computer and now shoot video in 1080p/30. I shoot landscape and lately have been taking mostly photo's with the old G16 RAW A/P. Pictures are more fun for me than video other than those super zoom pans from miles away which requires the heavy stuff. As I'm getting OLD the compact cameras are really intriguing me. The G16 got me hooked.
Sony has better built quality(metal) better and more precise fit & finish (ring, exp contr, buttons wheels,shutter etc) and of course autofocus!
They are both metal, dials and buttons are similar. AF is better on the Sony and said as much.
@@TECH360TVWrong! The most noticeable difference when you get the two cameras in your hand is the change in build materials used for the G5 X Mark II, with the camera body and lens ring being plastic, rather than the metal found on the original G5 X ...
I had both cameras in my hand and used them both.
@@TECH360TV So do I and many other reviewers including Ephotozine..
www.ephotozine.com/article/canon-powershot-g5x-i-vs-g5x-ii-comparison-review-33853
excellent informational presentation. great job.
Thanks for watching
Great review and comparison, i'm planning to buy ine of them, i am a professional photographer...and for this i think the Canon concept is the most roght for me.
The lens, more bright and so more creamy background then Sony images is for me the mean that let me prefer the Gx5 mk ii, it seems built for PHOTOGRAPHY, Sony for all round.
Thanks
Thanks for watching
Great video. I'm really into stills photography and this told me all I need to know.
Thanks for watching
Maybe you should have done the comparison using the Sony RX100VA. It’s got a 24-70/f1.8~2.8 lens. I have the RX100VI and on import into Lr my images aren’t saturated like yours. Maybe you needed to check the import settings. On DPReview, most comment on Sony’s “Blue” cast vs Canon’s “Warm” skin tones. Seems your finding are the reverse.
The video was about the latest cameras from each company that came out roughly at the same time.
Import settings were per as normal. I found the Canon to have a more pleasing color out of the two. This however was based on my monitor settings and calibration which can be different from others
Thank you so very much for the review Bobby. I recently bought the Panasonic ZS100 camera for photography, not video. The image quality and build quality are just not up to par on this camera. I am returning it and have been looking at both these exact cameras for consideration as a replacement. Since I only shoot photography and have no need for video or 4k, I could not appreciate your video more. The timing on finding this video could not have been more perfect. Thank you so much for you views on photography, my hobby and passion.
Glad we could help
You can fine tune the white balance defaults on the sony, so you could decrease the magenta and yellow. The pop up 1 step viewfinder that turns the camera on and off is great for street photography. I added a fake leather $8 camera case. The bottom part with a bulge on the right side adds a grip to the camera. You can tweak the rx100vii to overcome the issues you mention, but you can’t improve the AF performance of the canon.
Canon has issued an update since to help on autofocus from what I understand.
Yes there are tweaks and things you can do, but many buyers of these cameras buy to point and shoot. Some like yourself are very knowledgeable about tweaks and accessories, but I’m comparing out of the box and as is.
@@TECH360TV Thank you - although if someone spends 1200 USD on a RX100M7, I think they may want more than just a point and shoot. I considered the Canon, although I have been shooting Sony in recent years. The Sony AF, especially continuous EyeAF, is a true game-changer and allows me to take photos if perfect focus that was not possible before. I feel the RX100M7 is very expensive, and I am not wealthy, but it is definitely worth the extra cost compared to the Canon. The 1 step EVF instantly on allows me to not miss the moment. These 2 factors are worth the price difference. I sold the RX100 M3 as the pop-up EVF was 2 steps and AF-C was always hunting a little. These features really help me take photos. The phase-detect AF is great, and if I photograph people the eyes are always in focus without having to fiddle with the 4-way controller. Color rendering could have to do also on how Adobe interprets the RAW files, and someone could create an import preset that tweaks the colors. Or use a Neutral color profile, instead of Standard and lower contrast/saturation for JPGs or video
@@TECH360TV even by today (13 december 2022) the canon g5xii has still severe focussing issues, especially when it comes to smaller thing against bright light, i've almost tossed it against a wall many times because i missed the moment with this cam.
other than that i prefer it over the rx100vii, the colors are just way better and the bokeh too.
Thanks, an objective and balanced review. I bought the Canon and agree with the picture quality. I do Plogging (photos of friends, family, etc... and places on my travels) and don't want to carry a ton of equipment. Nice bright, colourful photos with the Canon.
Be nice to see a comparison between the G5X mkII and the RX100 VA ... these 2 are the direct comparisons imo.
THIS IS LITERALLY THE ONLY REVIEW TALKING ABOUT PHOTO. I know vlogging is the new craze but giving the photographers perspective is a good way to stand out from the pack. Great job guys!
Photography needs love too 😊. Thanks for watching
UPDATE: I bought one and it’s an incredibly capable camera. Even at 20x digital hybrid optical/zoom the picture quality is unmatched for a 1 inch sensor. Strongly recommend it!
which one did u get
Thanks man. I was beginning to think all reviews of these cameras were just about video. Biggest issue for me is that the Sony is £300 more expensive here in the UK. Need to check them out in the flesh but definitely leaning on the Gx5ii.
Well, cough, the Canon might do 20 fps ... if you don't mind focus. If the subject is moving ... try to get 20 fps out of the Canon ... and look at the shots it took to check how many are in focus and how many are not. So you can take 20 fps of a still subject (why would you?) or 20fps of someone moving horizontally to your cam. Outside of that ... DOF is a big plus for the Canon but if I want to take serious photos where object/background separation matters, I'll go full frame with a nice 1.4 lens. For the point and shoot events, DoF matters less (to me) than capturing the moment. And that's where the Canon tends to hunt for focus while the Sony just takes an in-focus image. If people are of interest - face detection and adjusting lighting to face is where Canon still struggles as is painfully evident in the beginning of the video. The ND filter is nice if you do video in broad daylight but you can clip one onto the Sony as well. Thankfully the filters are not that expensive with this small lens diameter. The biggest downside of the Sony is the price and the fact that it is as slippery as an eel.
And please don't blame Sony for the initial interpretation of the RAWs by Lightroom. Capture one does a different job on those. So you can easily import all RAWs with an adjusted initial profile and fix that. This is something Adobe does to all Sony cameras. So you fix this ONCE and import all images with the profile. You seem to believe that the "images have this reddish hue to it". Not so. Lightroom interprets them to have it. Capture One doesn't. But you can override the terrible default profile in Lightroom and have it use a decent one. And it is a bit of a shame that you do RAW but decide to not see the dynamic range the cameras offer. There's quite a bit of a difference regarding the shadow regions.
Great video. Looking for a good compact camera to take with me everyday. I got down to these two in choice but I mainly take photos early morning or late evening due to work and the Canon 1.8 caught my attention, but review sites mainly tell me the Sony is king always due to video. I only shoot stills and I am used to contrast AF due to my M43 cameras. Really enjoyed your style of review and I think I will order a Canon.
Good choice. Since this review they have also updated the firmware so AF should be better
One thing I didn't hear mentioned which is something to point out. For those who prefer a faster lens and don't need the 200mm in the Sony...Most of the earlier iterations of the RX100 are still available as new cameras which is why I bought the RX100 VA with the 1.8 to 2.8 equivalent 24-70mm lens and many of the other features of the VII. With Sony's excellent Clear Image Zoom option turned on, it gets out to about 135mm field of view when that might be needed. Oh, and the price points are less too!
True, but the video was based on these two cameras. There are alternatives but then the video becomes quite long ;)
I love how begrudging he is, on every point for the Sony. Why not just come out and say you're biased towards the canon.
I said for photography I’m more inclined towards the Canon. If you want a camera that does both very well then Sony is the camera for you.
Sorry but I didn’t like the colors that camera out of the Sony and I felt the ND filter inside the Canon allows you to shoot wide open I. Bright daylight and get some nice depth of field.
Sony focuses more on zoom and video for this camera and they exceed where there put their focus.
@@TECH360TV Sorry, but having worked in marketing, i know how important it is to use inflection and tone, to emphasise points you want to stand out. You may be doing it unconsciously, but it is noticeable. Otherwise, nice video. 🙂
While I thank you for the compliment on the video and appreciate you taking the time to comment, there is no biased here nor an incentive to like one brand over the other. I liked the Canon for the reasons mentioned above and also ergonomics. Does Sony have better tech in the camera? Yes but that doesn’t mean it’s a better camera for photography.
this man hates sony
Actually I don’t
Many thanks for this interesting and cool comparison. I would like to go for the Canon. Unfortunately it isn't available anymore in Europe. Nobody knows why.
Thank you for the information. I am looking at these two and since I am not into video, I think you helped me make my decision.
Glad we could help
Thank you very much. I've been waiting for something like this for months. Thank you for reviewing photography!!!! It's all about video and filming and vlogging these days. Best review I have seen so far between these two cameras. And actually, I Just made my decision on which one to buy. PHOTOGRAPHY!!!! Gald someone remembered it!
Thanks for watching and glad this review helped with the decision.
Thanks for a good review. On colours, did you set the Sony to Neutral?
i am currently choosing mainly between these two cameras. my nikon p300 series was my go to for over ten years but the last (P340) died recently and nikon doesn't make them or anything like it anymore. I am not a vlogger and any video i shoot is purely incidental; I am a photographer, an old-school 35 mm film one. Yes getting shots in focus quickly is important, and I hear the sony is superior at that. but what I also need is the ability to change certain key settings -- iso, exposure compensation, aperture, shutter speed, white balance, aspect ration, monochrome -- quickly and easily, without digging through mountains of menus. and I need something pocketable. I've taken some great interiors at locations like the Metropolitan Opera House, you need a wide aperture. I don't like the Sony's red hue in several of the photo examples -- it's why I select neutral over vivid, why i shot with ektachrome for critical work. I'm leaning toward the canon.
Awesome review - very thorough and I like that you talked about things that I like; I'm not a vlogger! Take care and be safe out there....
For me, top notch AF performance is even more important when working with small viewfinders and screens. I own a mark iii sony, and will keep it for the slightly faster lens. But I hope to acquire the mark vii at some point for the vastly improved focusing ability and zoom range. As far as the color, Sony does give you a tool to adjust the picture profile, if you prefer the cooler look.
Thank you, that was very useful, especially with the focus on photography.
Thanks for watching
Thank you, I’ve always found canon to be great image quality I’ve always been a fan of canon. Sony colors and stuff aren’t always the best out of the box, but being a point and shoot, I would think most people would want the fast good auto focus to get the shot in focus and take the picture every time. A bird in the hand is better than two in the bush... an in focus picture that has slightly off colors is better than missing the moment completely fiddling with the focus or getting a bunch of blurry out of focus pictures. Last vacation I was on I had the EOS M50 and took like 650+ pictures, it nailed the focus every single time if Canon gave better focus on these I would be all over it!
The better focus is the g7x mark III. It's almost exactly the same camera, but better
Excellent comparison
Interesting review - I was a faithful Canon G-series user from the original G1 and several others (only the models with fully articulated screens) ending with the G12, now with a Sony RX100.
For me the outstanding autofocus and extra reach swung the decision towards the Sony. But if you want a brighter lens and don't need the extra reach, the GX5 II or the Sony RX100VA are good choices.
In case any viewer is worried by the RX100's lack of grip (as mentioned in the video), you can buy the Sony AGR2 grip for very little money.
It's easy to install and for me that fixed the problem.
Sony AGR2 ...i bought it brand new for only 18$ for my Sony RX100VA.. ;)
It took me a few hours, but finally a photography review about these kind of cameras, although I'm searching for the G7X II.
THANK YOU! I really don't care about video and I'm about to buy a G5X mark II. this really helped making the right decision.
Glad this video helped!
1:15 I don't know where Canon is focusing! I had the same issue with original G7X and I was hoping that Canon give the new G7X & G5X a better and more reliable auto focus capability !
Yes the autofocus system is a big let down on these cameras.
Easily the best review and comparison I've seen. I'm not interested in vlogging or video.
I was leaning the Canon your video has helped me make my decision the G5x ll it is! Thank you.
Thanks for watching
I got the Sony rx100vII for Christmas I've been taken photos with it everyday since and idk taken photos in the house with lower light makes my photo not clear n sharp n if I bump up the iso I dont want it noise and even shooting outside to me the Sony photo quality is not good so I'm going to best buy today to mess around with the cannon try it out and see! My camera I had was 6yrs old Sony hx50v 30x zoom pocket camera the sony rx100vII is a huge step up but I want start getting into portraits and being able to have a 1.8 instead of 2.8 for lower lighting so I dont have to drop my shutter or raise my iso while taken photos in a house will help I'd think? But I mainly do wildlife and landscape photography so I'm not really sure If the cannon can keep up but like i said it has to be better than my 6yr old Sony hx50v! I would really like your thoughts if I should return the Sony rx100vII or keep it
I think try both but if you need it to capture wildlife especially moving animals the Sony could be the better option. Having a faster aperture is very nice though and that will help in lower light situations. It’s a toss up in your case to be honest. Go with what you feel more comfortable with
If i understand correctly the best of the rx100vii and g5xii is the rx100va with a smal rig grip?
That’s a great way to put it. This setup could be ideal for those who prioritise a balance between high performance and physical usability.
Thanks for the review. I struggle with the F1.8 vs 2.8 on the Sony. I have a Canon F2.0 now, a very old S95, but I like it. You have discussed, like many have, the Sony focus, being great. The canon, not quite as good, but "OK". I liked that you commented on the Sony 200mm - not really needed in a pocket camera and anyone buying will trade off the F1.8 Canon vs the 200mm of the Sony - but I think I'll go with the Canon and work around the non-instant focus. If Sony had the F1.8, and out to 100mm, (or 200 as it is now), I'd pay the extra and get the Sony. Sure, crank up the ISO but then noise starts to become an issue. I think the 1" sensors will be a major improvement over the S95, and video quality will be better on either camera, so I'm ahead of the game on both these points too.
Thanks for watching. I’m sure Canon will address some of the focusing issues in time.
This is the review I have been waiting for. I don't give a darn about video..for that I can use my phone. I'm pretty much sold on the Canon here for PHOTOGRAPHY, and I can live with a little slower auto focus etc. My issue is I am a current owner of the Panasonic LX100II. I actually love that camera and I'm almost sure? it will beat both the RX100 and G5XII for pure image quality, low noise, less chromatic aberration that I have seen in many GX5II samples on the net, and creamy bokeh etc. Size wise I don't think it's all that more large than the G5XII Yup no flip screen..so adios to selfies...don't care..However I do like the longer zoom on the G5XII and my issue with the LX100II is, dust on the sensor. My first one I returned as within one day I saw a couple dust spots. So the second one has been great but I have to be SO ultra careful with it...blowing dust off the lens EVERY time I use it..or actually lol, I walk around with a tiny piece of that blue painter's tape, and dab the lens barrel to get any tiny dust it may have off before shutting it off. I wonder if you have tried the LX100II? but..as I say I have to be so careful with it "I am not enjoying using it so much" Image quality though I do think the LX100 is a winner on pure image quality vs the Sony AND Canon? But having to be so careful using it meh??..hence I may get the Canon...GREAT review!!!
Excellent, thanks. Skin tones, hue and lens flare test in particular.
Both are about €1000 (!) on ebay and MPB now, apparently no one can make any money on high-end compacts anymore and the rest of the world are using their phones or lugging mirrorless kits around.
To my surprise G5 X II comes out on top on my pocket-hybrid-2024 list.
120mm 1.8-2.8m EVF, Live ND, SOOC color science, OIS and EIS, 120fps (no audio, AF or IS though), USB charging, USB power for timelapse and streaming, 3 slots for user picture profiles (plenty of good 3rd party ones around, free or paid).
I've tested a TZ100 (25-250mm) and a ZV-1 and agree that 120mm is sufficient and the 75-120mm range is very nice to have.
Sony didn't add touch menus until ZV-1 M2 in 2023 AFAIK.
If you're still doing camera reviews I'll suggest adding a gloves-on segment to see how it handles using physical controls only.
I don't know... I see photographs on Flickr and Instagram and the photos with the Sony RX100 M7 look more interesting and closer to aps-c while the G5X mark II photos look closer to a compact camera. It could be that the Sony is purchased by more professional photographers that edit and compose more carefully. And the bright lens in the Canon cannot blur as much as my ancient Sigmq DP2 which seems to have nicer colors than both despite being so cumbersome to use.
For the record, the canon is 120mm not 100mm , it was the old G5X Mk1 / G7X series which top out at 100mm .. not a lot fo difference I know but a usable extra
The answer to the touchscreen question: a camera you take on hikes is more likely to fall. Once the touchscreen is broke, the camera is unusable. Happened to me on the sony tx-30. I got the lumix ft4 afterwards: it is indeed annoying to go through the menus, but it s safer when traveling with it. I guess sony wanted to avoid such issues with the rx100 vii.
Nice review, which brings me to wonder...
Can you change a camera sensor for a better one ? No.
Can you shift colours of a RAW-file picture via a software ? Yes.
Can you change the AF system that's within a specific camera ? No.
Can you tweak the exposure of a RAW-file picture via a software ? Yes.
Can you change the lens of such a camera for one that has less aberrations and distorsion ? No.
Can you use a tripod (or any kind of "stabilizer") when you're about to snap an image ? Yes.
So...
Thanks for watching 👍
Thanks. Do you think the Lumix Tz200 still can beat the phone cameras? I'm looking at Pixel 8a and Samsung a55 that has 50 mega pixel
Each of these devices has its own strengths when it comes to photography. It’s capable of capturing high-quality photos and has a good autofocus system. The Lumix TZ200 is a dedicated camera with a ” sensor and a 24-360mm equivalent lens, offering a versatile zoom range. However, its lens quality isn’t very consistent.
If you would choose betwee these two and Panasonic Lumix tz200?
If you prioritize portability and high-speed performance, you might lean towards the RX100 VII. If you prefer a wider aperture and better handling, G5X Mark II might be your choice. If a longer zoom range is important to you, then the Lumix TZ200 could be the best fit.
What about G1X Mk3 vs Sony RX100 VII?
I sold my RX100 V due to its ergonomics, and one of the options I am considering is Canon G1X mk3 (together with G5X mk2 and Panasonic LX100 mk2)...
Hi, I have not much experience on digital products. Are these cameras' viewfinder give the same quality with the viewfinder on 35mm film camera?
Great comparison. The Canon G5XII has a focal range of 24-120
Thanks for watching
I intended to buy Sony rx100m5 , after watching your clip I have changed - So now I will buy canon g5xm2 or g7xm3 because I only take photos and like the color of canon . Thanks !