We can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
@@kirkc9643 Nineteen hundred and forty-six. 1946, how does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.
@@Thomas-xj3ts well said sir ... People ho drink and youse it won't see anything negative about that ... If you got your shot you for sure don't wanna hear anything bad about it afterwards hahaha
Hmm. The New World Order makes money off every kill. George Bush Sr. did operation condor to destablize Latin America to exploit the cheap labor into agriculture. We flouridate to get rid of the toxic agriculture biproduct.
Absolutely ! It took a few outstanding journalists more than 50 years to discover that "they" used this stuff in the KZ ´s with g r e a t success: Folks were obedient and calmly until apathy ! But even today only a few million out there know these devastating facts ! I am VERY afraid about recent theories declaring fluoride, white sugar AND Vaccines - together with herbi-/pesticides (like glyphosat) to be the u t t e r y dangerous comibination for humanity EVER ! Thats also true if you take a closer look on the so calles "Covid-19- the vaccination especially cocerning obedience. The vaccination-rate in the most obendient counties over here in central europe: UP TO WHOPPING 98 % And if you didn´t know why cancer, autism and almost ANY desase has been rising so exponetially, yet dramatically in the last decades after WW II: NOW you KNOW !
7:28 Wait, wait, wait. Only _five_ times more? Not more than a hundred times more? Only five times more is within the range of possible exposure as a result of water fluoridation. Before watching this video I wasn't worried about fluoridation, but if this is what passes for analysis in that meta-study and everybody is citing it as evidence, I am now _very_ concerned.
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Let's say you take in 2 liters of water a day with 1 mg of fluoride per liter. If you drank 5x that amount, then you would would be taking in 10 liters of water a day to suffer the same effects. You probably weigh at least 150 times as much as a lab rat. This means you would need to drink 1,500 liters of water per day to put your body at risk of suffering minor side effects. Also consider the fact that your teeth have a much larger surface area and decay significantly faster, therefore absorbing more fluoride. Taking this into consideration, you may actually need closer to 1,600 liters per water to pose a risk to yourself.
@@StaleDoritoCrumbNo, he said 5x concentration, sounds like he’s talking about percentage. Annoying how he didn’t clarify if it’s percentage or milligrams
1. Humans are much bigger so you'd think they'd need more of any harmful substance to be affected, 2. Humans are not rats, studies on rats can be supplemental info but don't prove anything. Human trials are the ground truth
Not really, youre just falling for what he is saying. Just throwing out all the studies that show that flouride is actually harmful in levels only a little bit higher than us tap water
Because it's POISON..."There's your sign"; Flouride was synthesized in Germany by hitler; He literally poisoned local water supploes in the ghetto's to make the inhabitants more cop esthetic...
Toothpaste literally has a thousand times more fluoride in it than drinking water. And even if you swallow the entire amount you put on your toothbrush, it’s still not considered dangerous. It’s only recommended to seek medical attention if you ingest more than the normal amount used for brushing. Even then, resulting problems tend to be minor. The thing is, everything is poison in a high enough dose; it’s the dose that makes the poison.
I might have missed this but it is also a misconception that fluoride is always added to the water. The levels in most of those countries are *adjusted* to be within certain safe limits. This of course means in some places the natural amount of fluoride is so high that some of the fluoride is removed from the water before it goes to the homes.
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
@somad6997okay why don't you explain the science then? I'm also not a scientist but he is correct about Hexafluorioscilic acid being the compound added and not natural fluorine. Wanks like you that come in acting tough and educated without addressing the truth. You're worse than primary school teacher 😅
@@donald1meyeryou copy pasting this comment everywhere is NOT gonna make read it. Learn to actual form an argument instead of copy pasting and parroting shit.
@@donald1meyerno they actually don’t add that. They add in sodium fluoride. That chemical you mentioned is also added in nature. Besides, thats not what you should be worrying about. Get the water treatment inspection report from your local city treatment plant and see how much mercury they let slip by
Fluoride itself is not the cause of lower IQ rather the deficiencies it causes when taken. Fluoride antagonizes both iodine and magnesium which both are very essential in mental health. When you take fluoride everyday which is the case in many people. People take it in water and toothpastes not mentioning the dental fillings used in dentistry that releases more fluoride. Iodine deficiency which fluoride consumption promotes causes symptoms like weight gain, hair loss, fatigue and memory loss. Magnesium deficiency causes sleepiness, fatigue, loss of appetite, etc. These deficiencies setup an individual to a poor state of mental health. It's advisable to increase your iodine and magnesium intake if you're going to take fluoride.
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Just use it topically. Studies have shown that those who were given water free of SodiumFluoride and used it topically, had no evidence of it persisting in their urine. Could it have binded with those molecules? Maybe but unlikely. Its more likely to bind with Calcium. Either way, its a very stable and unreactive molecule on its own
This is why making scientific studies is bit tricky. You take a guy who just has been eating punch of toothpaste and then you get obvious result that the guy was kinda dumb...
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Hey love your video! I undertook this research during a university project of mine, a small note to add: Most of the countries shown in 9:50 that does not have water fluorination have naturally high levels of fluoride. I used Denmark as an example in my project, where the concentration of fluoride in drinking water is similar to US, therefore contributing to the similar tooth decay rate. P.S. I used the average values in my studies, I know the concentration profile of fluoride exposed to the enamel have spikes and dips through out the day, depending on various factors like eating and other activities, that would have made a difference on whether spikes of fluoride intake is enough so long as the total amount is taken in, or having constant small exposure through out the day is more effective. Either way, it's a 30 mark project, so if I could get away with less effort I'm taking that option.
Can you do a video about the practice of drinking hard alcohol before/after eating to "help with digestion". I always thought that was just a lazy excuse to drink alcohol.
My aunt got really aggressive at me for asking her why her toothpaste doesn't have flouride or flourine. She said that the epiphysis hardens up like a stone lol
Cause your aunt is less naive about life then you Governement doesnt care it makes "science mistakes" that resulted in destroying your health They would blame the scientifics who were wrong in their reasearch. Previous administrations At worst they might pay a laughable punishement fine in courts or give the survivors 25 000$ maybe more to close the drama and move on. And thats only when even their team of best lawyers have trouble defending them Should not play lottery with your health. If there are better option play it safe
It is a Chemical biproduct of neutralizing acids so yes it can be a industrial waste product but that is utterly not a bad thing. For good example pure gold is a intensive industrial product that has been subject to some absolutely volatile and severe chemical processes before it could be refined into the final product but if you consume pure gold its not toxic, the same can be said for Fluoride, (Within minimal doses it isn't toxic)
@@Hawkeye_PC Unlike pure gold, fluoride is toxic. Dude, read your tube of toothpaste. lol They do not process this industrial waste product to make it safe. Why did you make that up? lol Check it out. ruclips.net/video/QzBytpUvNdA/видео.htmlsi=b9qyycREZuzurmHf
Yes, it is a major industrial toxic waste by product, that would cost billions to dispose of. But they sell it to our municipal water treatment plants to put it in the water! When you pay your water bill, you are paying for the pleasure of having toxic waste injected into your tap water. lol ruclips.net/video/QzBytpUvNdA/видео.htmlsi=b9qyycREZuzurmHf
@@Hawkeye_PC Refined fluoride, such as pure sodium fluoride, which is in your toothpaste, IS TOXIC even though it is 99.9% pure. It's safe in the tube, but soon as you spread it around in your mouth the sodium fluoride will absorb into your blood via the gums. Where it gets into your brain and lowers your neurological function and intelligence. Not to mention,, other risks such as cancer. This is a good video for this subject; ruclips.net/video/GX0s-4AyWfI/видео.htmlsi=wyGs31hwmI8Lpblf
02:34 OK... this video taught me something when I went in fully expecting to just hear a video essay on things I already know. Well played, sir. Well played.
I skipped the intro but I’m assuming you still didn’t bring up fluorosis which I’ve heard multiple actual doctors talk about when it comes to modern problems with fluoride consumption
As you mention fluoreide makes tooth stronger, but only on surface. It is important to note that you must take fluoride while tooth is in development to affect the inner parts of enamel and dentin structure. So use it when you need it (mineralization proces) and don't overuse it and get stuck with fluoride stainings (which makes enamel structure more prone to abrasion (weird to take right?)).
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Actually our saliva repairs the tooth on it's own. If we had natural diets without, GMO, pesticides and herbicides, we wouldn't have to worry about tooth decay.
@@encouraginglyauthentic43Actually the real cause of tooth decay is the excessive amount of sugar in our diets. There isn't a strong correlation between Genetic modification, herbicides, or pesticides to tooth decay. You are just spewing nonsense.
That's assuming the only source you have is from tap water, which is a huge and incorrect assumption. But also, yes... Anybody can easily be drinking double the amount of water right now. That's why the precautionary principle exists.
So 3x to 5x the amount of fluoride compared to the 1ppm (mg/l) US-drinking water standard can cause harm and possible even lower IQ in rats - that seems like a very low safety margin, since the amount of water we consume varies drastically. Imagine a worker who brews himself 4 liters of black tea with tap water everyday to rehydrate while working in summer..
It's in processed food as well. In beer, soda pop, teas, etc. They use fluoridated water. And when they make cereal or many other food stuffs using fluoridated water, the fluoride remains in the product. The ADA calls this the "Halo Effect" because even people using well water will get dosed. Americans are getting more exposure. Let alone, this lying clown pretends he doesn't know upping the exposures in studies is normal practice and does not disqualify the study or it's results.
How can rats have an iq, if knowing an iq requires taking a test? Taking an iq test measures how good you are at the iq test. Once again, how do you test a rats iq?
I’m sorry, you were saying? NEW YORK (AP) - A U.S. government report expected to stir debate concluded that fluoride in drinking water at twice the recommended limit is linked with lower IQ in children. The report, based on an analysis of previously published research, marks the first time a federal agency has determined - “with moderate confidence” - that there is a link between higher levels of fluoride exposure and lower IQ in kids.
You need to be more careful when making the distinction between "there's no evidence fluoride causes a decrease in IQ" and "there's evidence fluoride doesn't cause an increase in IQ."
The way I see it, pseudoscience is proof that ordinary people are trying to do science. That's a good thing. Their theories might be somewhat wrong but science is never completely correct. Do you think people always knew how things worked? No, of course not.. they had to figure it out themselves which is what these people are doing
Yes, if that so-called "Science" is full of bias and personal preferences. Also, why even bother re-inventing the wheel, when others much more brilliant that you have already done the necessary researches and come up with results thousand times more accurate than you'll ever be able to conclude? This is just a weak argument.
Sorry to be frank, but this is complete BS. The 'science' of pseudoscience is completely biased and immune to contradicting evidences. The proponents always have a fixed set of sources, of like minded social media posts, biased books and biased conmen. The proponents only receive information that suit their agenda and what goes well with their narratives. None of this aligns with scientific methodology. Science is not fully correct, yes, but the same science community itself correct itself when given contradicting evidence 🚶🏽♂️when Edwin Hubble discovered galactic red shift, steady state theory was rejected by science 🤷🏽♂️ is that the case of pseudoscience? Creationism, flat earth, astrology..... All are blindly followed and opposing arguments are received by deaf ears.
@@trestres236no, all science was pseudoscience at one point and eventually was refined by criticism and experimentation to become accurate. Miasma theory telling people to not poop in the water supply laid the grounds for germ theory to set up water treatment facilities.
@@koushuuhe’s saying that even tho they’re ignorant of the validity of more intelligent peoples work, they still have a grasp of invention and pursuit of progress.
It all depends on concentration. Many countries already have accelerated aging from excessive fluoride on drinking water, since it is hard to keep it in safe consistent levels without extensive monitoring and regulation.
wait, so you admit that certain doses of fluoride DO in fact cause IQ/developmental problems, but you rate the "fluoride->low IQ" claim as 8/10 stupid? How so?
.... did you not pay attention to the video? it was very clearly laid out that the dosage that is added to water is way smaller than the dosage that causes developmental issues
@@ssword123 sure, generally the doses are way smaller. I do remember that in some remote cases, dosages were botched by the workers. Therefore, the claim is not stupid in itself: it has a true foundation, but can be either applicable or not depending on the dosage pumped in a specific place during a specific time period. Most people can't even find out the dosages in their areas unless they test themselves.
@@ssword123Yes but what you’re not taking into account is the amount of other things we have on a daily basis that contains even more ppm of fluoride then what is just put in our water. Take the example of Phyllis Mullenix who ran the testing on rats some who had the fluoridated water and some who didn’t. What she found was that the rats who drank the fluoridated water were more likely to give birth to hyperactive babies with a lower iq then the rates who had non fluoridated water. A similar study was done only 5 years ago in Canada (the source I don’t know look it up) also found that in humans male offspring with mothers who drink fluoridated water come out hyperactive with lower iqs then those who drank non-fluoridated water while female offspring remained unaffected. In the end Phyllis was fired from her job for trying to change the public image of fluoride and her study was deemed invalid by her opposition because it contained more ppm then what the government put in the water. However it actually contained how many ppm of fluoride the average human has a day.
Well.. to me the study of children being affected by fluoride exposition does have sort of a significance: even though the diluted fluoride did not present a correlation, the free fluoride amount did. When we study chemistry in school, we learn that fluorine is the most electromagnetic non-metal. Which means, if by any chance it gets free electrons while inside our organs or circular system, it may destabilize many proteins or cell structures, affecting its function. The animal body has a very complex built-in biochemistry that is all the time taking electrons without necessary providing one back in the same form : in general organic elements and some minerals have that (like calcium, which is very much needed). Another big problem of fluoride is that it is a combination with CALCIUM and fluorine. When this over exposition to calcium reaches specific organs, it may even be detrimental, such as leading to a calcification where it shouldn't. Be aware of what you consume.
Yes, fluoride is probably safe in a concentration of 1ppm, which IS the usual concentration of fluoride in drinking water. The rats were exposed to 5 times that, but we can also end up actually consuming as much. Fluoride is in everything, and just because we put 1ppm in our water, doesn't mean that is our total fluoride intake. A wide variety of foods and beverages as well as toothpaste also contain fluoride, which goes over the 1ppm limit in total. If you look into the history of fluoride, you will see that it is a toxic byproduct of aluminium production, and it literally melts concrete. The idea that fluoride is completely harmless is one if not the greatest propaganda campaigns of history. Fluoride is a byproduct of aluminium production. It was considered completely useless before we found it's effect on teeth. Before this newfound use, ALCOA, an aluminium company in the US, tried it's best to avoid getting sued for unsafe practices linked to fluoride (hundreds of sick/dead workers due to fluoride and fluoride fumes every year). During WW2, the government needed fluoride and ALCOA obliged. This need for fluoride created a huge mess for both ALCOA and the government, but they were on the same side now because if fluoride was unsafe, the government would be to blame too. It is during this time that Frederick McKay (funded by ALCOA after they found out what he was doing) discovered fluoride's dental properties. ALCOA and the US govt jumped on this opportunity to make fluoride completely safe in the eyes of the public. It isn't a toxic substance that melts concrete and is used in nuclear bombs, it's a harmless chemical that makes your teeth white! Frederick McKay ended up going against fluorisation at the end of his life. TLDR: fluoride prevents caries and is safe at 1ppm in the drinking water. You are not consuming 1ppm of fluoride, probably much more. It was accepted in the public eye after a massive propaganda campaign by ALCOA and the government. I don't think the government wants to dumb us all down, but I do think we are still living with the consequences of a scummy company not wanting to do the right thing and dispose correctly of it's waste. I do not see the problem with fluoride in toothpaste, but I think it is pretty dangerous in water because it spreads everywhere and you end up with unwanted concentrations of fluoride no matter what you do.
Concentration of how much fluoride they add is of little relevance if you cook with it, which boils off water leaving behind a higher concentration. The fact they add it at all is the problem, because everyone who knows about it doesn't want it except for the people addicted to the big brother kool-aid.
Createnine is dependant on fluoride intake. So the author just tries to decieve and lie here. He himself does not know what he means, he just stole all the talking points.
2:22 dude, you are missing the actual hydroxy anions(OH-) in your pics. And that fluoroapatite cannot be correct as there is no way that 6 calciums and one fluorine can make a coordination complex that isn't so energetic that it wouldn't react with water or hydronium...
This is the worst type of propaganda. You gloss over things so quickly and make it seem like your point is accepted, but you completely failed to examine the ‘meta analysis’. The meta analysis ruled out many of the studies that showed a causal link between fluoride and impaired cognition without just cause. For example, the China study was discounted because ‘China has different values for fluoride’ and they live near mines? The people who live near mines were adjusted for because, hey, guess what? People in the western world also live and work in mines. They chose those areas to match western areas and then adjusted for different rates of fluoride in the water to do a comparative analysis. Further the study in Scotland was discounted because it didn’t rule out other things in the water “like lead and arsenic”. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard in my life. I live in Scotland, and we have some of the cleanest drinking water in western society, commonly known for its low contaminants. They didn’t test for arsenic and lead, because it hasn’t been allowed in the water supply for over a hundred years..We aren’t living in the dark ages. They also didn’t test for plutonium and mercury. That is the most ridiculous reason to just casually write off almost every causal study. Scottish water is often touted as some of the best drinking tap water in the world. UK. As a whole has fairly great tap water, but Scotland in particular is singled out in the uk as having the best by far, taken from mountain reservoirs and is at a much higher quality than bottled water. Ruling out the UK study showing a link to dementia, because they didn’t also test for contaminants that also aren’t in the water, is just fraud. The recent court cases and changes to the EPA limit for the safe amount of fluoride that can be in drinking water and the fact that it is toxic…well… I guess this video is already BS for the above reasons
The Chinese study was discounted because there were interfering variables, as you yourself described --- China does not regulate waste from mines properly, and that waste includes a wide variety of heavy metals that, guess what, "reduce IQ," (not to mention, mine waste-water has fluoride in it.) So, a comparative analysis is not possible because they are not control groups for each other.
Why is this an issue? Just use fluoridated toothpaste. The fluoride in water is probably not harmful, but it doesn't really help either. And who knows, measuring IQ is not like measuring height - it's probably hard to detect small differences (you would need very highly powered studies to show a difference, if there is one). For babies and toddlers too young to know how to brush and spit, just brush regularly using non-fluoridated toothpaste. Tooth cleanings come with fluoride paste anyway and will do more for their enamel. And they don't have adult teeth yet. By the time they do, they'll be using fluoridated toothpaste.
Okay, ignore the evidence and the recent suggestion to lower recommended flourish from .7 to 1.2 to .7 or lower due to research indicating neurotoxicity
that’s right. toothpaste isn’t needed if you consume virtually no refined carbs and sugar. fluorine from food and not a tube where you have to use it 3x a day for the rest of your life (could this be consumerism?). if one lives in the cities water is fluorinated, and all consumable beverages.
Please address the differences between calcium fluoride and sodium fluoride when discussing the published research. I have read the scientific literature myself and in every case the study of benefits of fluoride are in reference to calcium fluoride. Sodium fluoride is always toxic, specifically neurotoxic. This is where the controversy and distrust of the government has come into play with regards to adding sodium fluoride to water/dental products.
The levels of sodium fluoride in water are not high enough to cause any detectable toxicity. If toxicity isn't detectable, it might as well not be at all.
"The average loss in IQ was reported as a standardized weighted mean difference of 0.45, which would be approximately equivalent to seven IQ points for commonly used IQ scores with a standard deviation of 15.* Some studies suggested that even slightly increased fluoride exposure could be toxic to the brain. Thus, children in high-fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low-fluoride areas. The children studied were up to 14 years of age, but the investigators speculate that any toxic effect on brain development may have happened earlier, and that the brain may not be fully capable of compensating for the toxicity."
@@mousasaab2652 The only pseudoscience is this clown spewing lies to support the official narrative. Most likely, he is a psychopath paid to deceive people. It is well established that fluoride lowers IQ. And causes neurological damage, which was well known long before fluoridation. lol Fluoride was and is used to make rat poison. lol Any product containing fluoride has a poison warning. Just read your tube of toothpaste. HAHA. But this low IQ clown will tell you its magically safe. Just trust him. HAHA. His story of how fluoridation came to be, is laughably inaccurate. He uses the classic tell a different story, but ignore the true one completely. This lying clown down plays scientific studies and ignores others he must know exist. If you wish to know the history of fluoridation, here is an award winning journalist who spent years researching the subject and wrote a book about it, The Fluoride Deception. It's a very good read. ruclips.net/video/Ly_QP4rGczo/видео.htmlsi=lf_S8LZnDaVUHFTD
didnt quite understand the point made on 8:13 why did the creatine disproofed the first point made?? also about the rats, it was certainly increased the quantity to see if there was a difference. small impact does mean no impact and it is difficult to measure small impacts
I have some kind of allergy or sensitivity that has my skin react poorly with traditional sunscreen generally, and that is sometimes the case. Because of that my dermatologist has recommended mineral sunscreen, which just uses minerals suspended in a non-comedogenic oil to block UV rays. I hope that might be helpful.
Well one problem with sunscreen is most people don't get enough vitamin D or realize how much you should actually get because the RDA is like 10% what you should really be getting just for maintenance, so sunscreen exacerbates vitamin D deficiency which ironically actually raises cancer risk for many types of cancer other than skin cancer which is the most common and treatable. You should get more like 10,000 IU's of vitamin D a day, and naturally you can produce up to 40,000 IU's and amounts near that are required for months just to correct a deficiency. It's unlikely one would get skin cancer with consistent exposure to the sun where your skin produces enough melanin to protect itself, basically you just want to avoid burning. Another role melanin plays is regulating vitamin D, if you're deficient lower melanin means you'll get more vitamin D from the sun. Most people just don't get regular enough exposure to the sun to prevent burning hence sun screen. Even getting exposure almost naked during peak UV index as long as you're consistent should be fine, living in Minnesota I'd want to start in early May if possible when peak UV index is around 5 before it gets up to 9+ in summer. First time I was out in May I was out for 2 hours and got mild burns from that but by summer I could get an hour and not burn. It's not really correct to say the sun 'causes' cancer but it can act more like a catalyst, usually more needs to be wrong than inconsistent sun exposure. Supplementing vitamin D just isn't the same as getting it from the sun, it just feels different, getting a vitamin D oil and rubbing it on your skin is actually more ideal than orally but it still isn't the same, I get most people don't have time between jobs during peak UV index and don't live out in the country like I do so it's not realistic. I'm lucky I can just wear shorts and go on barefoot walks in nature while I'm getting sun. Another thing about sun screen that gets overlooked is even if all it has to block UV is zinc oxide, if it has nano particles that can absorb in the skin it could mess with your zinc levels which isn't good, which is why there's non-nano zinc oxide powder you can use to make your own sun screen, it'd probably save money just to make your own using the powder, coconut oil, shea butter, bees wax, ect. Coconut oil is probably fine for most and even by itself can help protect some, but bees wax would be to help if sweating a lot or in water.
I guess the way I see things like sun screen is that it's basically a way we came up with to deal with modern problems most people are dealing with that most of our ancestors didn't have, and it might work in some ways but is just introducing or exacerbating even more problems IMO than it's solving and most sun screen isn't even nearly as good as it could be from a health perspective and is mostly from companies that don't give a shit about public health to begin with. It's actually very similar with dental hygiene, it's not nearly as required as people think for dental health. But because people are so deficient in things like vitamin D and in this case especially vitamin K2 and there's so much refined sugar exacerbating problems, it's become more necessary to prevent tooth decay. But it's really more of a problem with modern diets and food quality. I had a loose filling for several months where because I was making sure I'm getting enough important nutrients it didn't end up getting decayed, no visible decay at all in the x-ray when I finally got it fixed when it was around lock-down. It really helps if you do mostly keto but I wasn't even being all that strict on sugar or brushing the last 2 months. I have basically no enamel either from lots of soda growing up but still don't really get new cavities where I used to every visit to the dentist, never use fluoride either(not even at the dentist and I decline the polishing) and have well water with no fluoride other than what occurs naturally. These are kind of like band-aid solutions that don't really fix the root of the problem and they make people a lot of money so there's incentive to deceive people.
Fluoridated water is also used to process food. Can't that significantly increase fluoride salt contents in the food? If so, could eating fluoridated food AND drinking flouridated water approximate the high fluoride content of the rat study? Addition of food processed with fluoridated water and fluoridated water might lower cognitive functions. Fluoride from three meals plus snacks plus fluoridated water may approximate the 5 times concentrations in the rat study. Processed food uses municipal (fluoridated) water.
@@ThisChangeIsAwful There are animal studies which are not difficult to find indicating such. You could make the argument the animal studies are not applicable to humans, however it would be reasonable to assume fluoride does impact humans and the 'science' is corporate funded garbage much like the tobacco industry covering up the hazards of smoking. Just because there are studies and meta-analysis of said studies does not make anything definitively true. This is one reason why someone really interested in science is extremely hesitant to make truth statements and why you shouldn't take the opinions of a random youtuber seriously.
It is a method of disposing of the toxic byproduct. People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Yes, the pineal gland is important for sleep hormones. But, as someone with an actual verified pineal cyst found on an MRI, that is quite large, I have zero issues with sleep. A little fluoride definitely won't disrupt your sleep.
Wait a minute how were we able to land on the moon b4 cell phones exists with a live feed of someone standing outside of the moon recording the first step , which would make the cameraman with 7G internet thr first person on the moon.
The reason why we haven't gotten rid of fluoride in the water, even though it costs money to put it in? It costs too much money to overhaul all the water treatment plants...
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
The only pseudoscience is this clown spewing lies to support the official narrative. Most likely, he is a psychopath paid to deceive people. I don't watch Alex Jones. Your statement is irrational. Perhaps, your IQ is low due to fluoride. It is well established that fluoride lowers IQ. And causes neurological damage, which was well known long before fluoridation. lol Fluoride was and is used to make rat poison. lol Any product containing fluoride has a poison warning. Just read your tube of toothpaste. HAHA. But this low IQ clown will tell you its magically safe. Just trust him. HAHA. His story of how fluoridation came to be, is laughably inaccurate. He uses the classic tell a different story, but ignore the true one completely. This lying clown down plays scientific studies and ignores others he must know exist. If you wish to know the history of fluoridation, here is an award winning journalist who spent years researching the subject and wrote a book about it, The Fluoride Deception. It's a very good read. ruclips.net/video/Ly_QP4rGczo/видео.htmlsi=lf_S8LZnDaVUHFTD
Hell ya brother, I stopped drinking tap water and switched over to just soda and my IQ has increased significantly, now my kids actually want to spend time with me and my wife said she wants to get back together. I also got a promotion at the same time, all must be due to cutting out fluoride in my diet. I even started brushing my teeth with straight charcoal and my tonsils have been healthier than ever@@MasterLocke2007
The question is why F is still forced to be in the drinking water to everyone if we have better ways to prevent tooth decay (tooth paste, dental hygiene, flossing, regular yearly checks). Just keep water clean of this supplements ;)
You drink water way more than you brush your teeth or go to the dentist, which means that it all adds up and keeps your teeth good without you having to do much :)
Pray tell, what benefit can be gained by consuming fluoride? Especially since the evidence is clear, that fluoride can only benefit teeth via direct contact/ Thus ingestion can only help teeth as it passes by them via the mouth. Now, please explain, to what benefit does an infant receive from ingesting fluoride?, When they have no teeth to decay. Would it not make more sense to provide to the public, free of charge, fluoride mouthwash? Rather than forcing mass medication? One more question, can eliminating one neurotoxin from your diet be worth it, even if there are millions of studies proving that toxin to be safe to ingest?
"can eliminating one neurotoxin from your diet be worth it, even if there are millions of studies proving that toxin to be safe to ingest?" They literally actively try to reduce high fluoride levels, so this is already happening. Its arguably why there's not _enough_ fluoride in drinking water to fluoridate everyone's teeth properly. "Rather than forcing mass medication?" Is iron in cereal a kind of "mass medication?" There are many ways that food and drinks are altered to prevent the widespread malnutrition that began cropping up when people began processing food. "Pray tell, what benefit can be gained by consuming fluoride? Especially since the evidence is clear, that fluoride can only benefit teeth via direct contact/ Thus ingestion can only help teeth as it passes by them via the mouth." The point of fluoride in drinking water isn't to get you to ingest it, but to get it in contact with your mouth. "Now, please explain, to what benefit does an infant receive from ingesting fluoride?" None, but _toddlers_ receive a benefit since their newly exposed teeth are early in development, so they get an outsized benefit from fluoride exposure. It just so happens that the fluoride levels in water mandated by regulations are insufficient for that, apparently. "Would it not make more sense to provide to the public, free of charge, fluoride mouthwash?" Never heard of toothpaste?
Regardless of how you feel about fluoride, adding any type of drug into the water supply isnt right. I never consented to that, and neither did millions of other people.
Well that's good to know since I drink a lot of tea. I guess it's good I stopped using fluoridated mouthwash, and use a water pitcher filter that removes fluoride. I actually use toothpaste with hydroxy-apatite for remineralizing my teeth, but I'm getting fluoride from tea as well, it appears.
Fluoride lowers iodide status and hence thyroid function. And low thyroid function has an impact. There are better microminerals to prevent dental decay snd better diets than either the "Mediterranean" diet or the "Pyramid" diet. 0:35
@@peppermintgal4302 Really? Some drink 3X what the sedentary drink, then added in toothpaste and other sources plus realize the dispensing equipment often over doses the drinking water. I drive quite a lot, I see a public that is seriously retarded in how they drive.
Though I have nothing against fluoride or fluoridated water, they did have a point against involuntary medication by the government. I can agree with that on principle and would be concerned about that precedent. But it's hard to have a nuanced opinion like that, especially in the current day.
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
That's because fluoride is never supposed to be consumed as there is no medical condition for a "hypofluorosis" as it's not a nutrient. Some real bullshit
Well fluoride can be bad for bones in chronic exposure. But that is more of an occupational hazard concern. (Yours truly can indeed be concerned about this)
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
It’s so funny that the anti-fluoride crowd also like to promote drinks such as black tea, a beverage that is much higher in fluoride from the plants absorbing minerals from the soil than any municipal water supply.
5:08. fluorines properities were well known before G.Bush. Again the academy of sciences report for the EPA is the de facto book on humans and fluorine compounds. from a toxicologist or chemists point of view. RUclips don' like linx out of the bubble. so best to google that.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Oh man thanks! I really appreciate the meta data coverage. Goodness knows people who dont know much about "research" need that info. Liked the video!
No problem!
We can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
@@Thomas-xj3ts Dude, lay off the chemtrails. Excess consumption is making you paranoid.
@@kirkc9643 Nineteen hundred and forty-six. 1946, how does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.
@@Thomas-xj3ts well said sir ... People ho drink and youse it won't see anything negative about that ... If you got your shot you for sure don't wanna hear anything bad about it afterwards hahaha
Bounced on my boys toothpaste tube to this
??????!!?!?!
??????????!? The flouride got to them 💀 /j
wha?
That's some good internet comment etiquette right there.
im watching these while eating now, shows how entertaining your videos really are yet extremely helpful. thanks for making great content.
Happy to hear that!
@@darkscienceyt you left out how fluoride accumulates in the brain while you age.
@@teru797'm pretty sure he doesn't need to address a blatant lie, lmao. He already proved the fluoride thing was clear quackery.
Hmm. The New World Order makes money off every kill. George Bush Sr. did operation condor to destablize Latin America to exploit the cheap labor into agriculture. We flouridate to get rid of the toxic agriculture biproduct.
You should update this to reflect the current findings!
Was about to say it
I am glad that the recent comments are LIT up with facts and knowledge 🔥🔥🔥
Absolutely ! It took a few outstanding journalists more than 50 years to discover that "they" used this stuff in the KZ ´s with g r e a t success: Folks were obedient and calmly until apathy ! But even today only a few million out there know these devastating facts ! I am VERY afraid about recent theories declaring fluoride, white sugar AND Vaccines - together with herbi-/pesticides (like glyphosat) to be the u t t e r y dangerous comibination for humanity EVER ! Thats also true if you take a closer look on the so calles "Covid-19- the vaccination especially cocerning obedience. The vaccination-rate in the most obendient counties over here in central europe: UP TO WHOPPING 98 % And if you didn´t know why cancer, autism and almost ANY desase has been rising so exponetially, yet dramatically in the last decades after WW II: NOW you KNOW !
At levels double the recommended limit... Do yall even understand what toxicity means?
@@theblkmechaniccare to share the article name? Or are u talking about the Canada prospective study?
It turns out it actually does.
RUclipsrs are known to shill for THE SCIENCE
7:28 Wait, wait, wait. Only _five_ times more? Not more than a hundred times more? Only five times more is within the range of possible exposure as a result of water fluoridation. Before watching this video I wasn't worried about fluoridation, but if this is what passes for analysis in that meta-study and everybody is citing it as evidence, I am now _very_ concerned.
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Let's say you take in 2 liters of water a day with 1 mg of fluoride per liter. If you drank 5x that amount, then you would would be taking in 10 liters of water a day to suffer the same effects. You probably weigh at least 150 times as much as a lab rat. This means you would need to drink 1,500 liters of water per day to put your body at risk of suffering minor side effects. Also consider the fact that your teeth have a much larger surface area and decay significantly faster, therefore absorbing more fluoride. Taking this into consideration, you may actually need closer to 1,600 liters per water to pose a risk to yourself.
@@StaleDoritoCrumbNo, he said 5x concentration, sounds like he’s talking about percentage. Annoying how he didn’t clarify if it’s percentage or milligrams
1. Humans are much bigger so you'd think they'd need more of any harmful substance to be affected, 2. Humans are not rats, studies on rats can be supplemental info but don't prove anything. Human trials are the ground truth
The rat was given 5x what humans consume. It’s like if a human was given 5x the concentration an elephant consumes.
When a youtuber yeets a meta analysis and researchs from the past 15 years to the ground.. You know we are in the endgame now..
Not really, youre just falling for what he is saying. Just throwing out all the studies that show that flouride is actually harmful in levels only a little bit higher than us tap water
It's like your suggestion is looking like a logical fallacy? Did the non F- have correlation
@@Lyle-xc9pg okay trumper.
Toothpaste tubes in my country (Australia) carry a warning that you're not supposed to swallow it.
In Brazil too
Yeah that’s on all of them. Even in the freedomland (US).
Yeah, because the fluoride content in toothpaste is many times higher than in tap water, as pointed out in the video.
Because it's POISON..."There's your sign"; Flouride was synthesized in Germany by hitler; He literally poisoned local water supploes in the ghetto's to make the inhabitants more cop esthetic...
Toothpaste literally has a thousand times more fluoride in it than drinking water. And even if you swallow the entire amount you put on your toothbrush, it’s still not considered dangerous. It’s only recommended to seek medical attention if you ingest more than the normal amount used for brushing. Even then, resulting problems tend to be minor. The thing is, everything is poison in a high enough dose; it’s the dose that makes the poison.
I might have missed this but it is also a misconception that fluoride is always added to the water.
The levels in most of those countries are *adjusted* to be within certain safe limits. This of course means in some places the natural amount of fluoride is so high that some of the fluoride is removed from the water before it goes to the homes.
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
@somad6997okay why don't you explain the science then?
I'm also not a scientist but he is correct about Hexafluorioscilic acid being the compound added and not natural fluorine.
Wanks like you that come in acting tough and educated without addressing the truth. You're worse than primary school teacher 😅
@@donald1meyeryou copy pasting this comment everywhere is NOT gonna make read it.
Learn to actual form an argument instead of copy pasting and parroting shit.
@@donald1meyerno they actually don’t add that. They add in sodium fluoride. That chemical you mentioned is also added in nature. Besides, thats not what you should be worrying about. Get the water treatment inspection report from your local city treatment plant and see how much mercury they let slip by
Fluoride itself is not the cause of lower IQ rather the deficiencies it causes when taken. Fluoride antagonizes both iodine and magnesium which both are very essential in mental health. When you take fluoride everyday which is the case in many people. People take it in water and toothpastes not mentioning the dental fillings used in dentistry that releases more fluoride. Iodine deficiency which fluoride consumption promotes causes symptoms like weight gain, hair loss, fatigue and memory loss. Magnesium deficiency causes sleepiness, fatigue, loss of appetite, etc. These deficiencies setup an individual to a poor state of mental health. It's advisable to increase your iodine and magnesium intake if you're going to take fluoride.
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
You are a moronic liar, stop talking about flouride you highschool dropout retard.
@@donald1meyer fluoride is just a molecule with fluorine in it, including dangerous acid and also tooth powder
Just use it topically. Studies have shown that those who were given water free of SodiumFluoride and used it topically, had no evidence of it persisting in their urine. Could it have binded with those molecules? Maybe but unlikely. Its more likely to bind with Calcium. Either way, its a very stable and unreactive molecule on its own
This is why making scientific studies is bit tricky. You take a guy who just has been eating punch of toothpaste and then you get obvious result that the guy was kinda dumb...
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
@@donald1meyer okay trumper
@@alexhobbs1208 What does that even mean
@@alexhobbs1208lol what?…
@@donald1meyerRUclips really needs a laugh react button
The world absolutely needs more people like you right now, man.
Video is a misleading.
@@cobanus2862 exactly
This comment has aged atrociously.
@@Ex_877wdym?
@@Ex_877 No it hasn't mouth breathing freak.
Hey love your video! I undertook this research during a university project of mine, a small note to add: Most of the countries shown in 9:50 that does not have water fluorination have naturally high levels of fluoride. I used Denmark as an example in my project, where the concentration of fluoride in drinking water is similar to US, therefore contributing to the similar tooth decay rate.
P.S. I used the average values in my studies, I know the concentration profile of fluoride exposed to the enamel have spikes and dips through out the day, depending on various factors like eating and other activities, that would have made a difference on whether spikes of fluoride intake is enough so long as the total amount is taken in, or having constant small exposure through out the day is more effective. Either way, it's a 30 mark project, so if I could get away with less effort I'm taking that option.
I don’t remember any vote on this nor did I give my permission to have a drug put into my water that’s not for sanitation purposes.
Was there a vote on supplemental iron in cereal?
Read up on the recent NTP (National Toxicology Program) study that fluoride lowers IQ.
Facts
Can you do a video about the practice of drinking hard alcohol before/after eating to "help with digestion". I always thought that was just a lazy excuse to drink alcohol.
Food with alcohol = sleep
He said in the video about alcohol that drinks with 15% ethanol or above *slow down* digestion
I drink wine to help with digestion sometimes. Does it not? I figured it’s fermented fruit so it would.
@@LmaoMoni Red wine.
alcohol relaxes the stomach so it FEELS like it helps but in fact it slows down digestion
My aunt got really aggressive at me for asking her why her toothpaste doesn't have flouride or flourine. She said that the epiphysis hardens up like a stone lol
happened to a woman once, but she drank 20 bags of black coffee every day
@@dbgrfdgit does calcify over time.
@@dbgrfdgI think the macrodosing of psychoactive drugs for extended periods of time is the likely culprit.
Cause your aunt is less naive about life then you
Governement doesnt care it makes "science mistakes" that resulted in destroying your health
They would blame the scientifics who were wrong in their reasearch. Previous administrations
At worst they might pay a laughable punishement fine in courts or give the survivors 25 000$ maybe more to close the drama and move on. And thats only when even their team of best lawyers have trouble defending them
Should not play lottery with your health. If there are better option play it safe
Is fluoride an industrial waste product that instead of companies paying to dispose, they make money by selling it to governments?
It is a Chemical biproduct of neutralizing acids so yes it can be a industrial waste product but that is utterly not a bad thing. For good example pure gold is a intensive industrial product that has been subject to some absolutely volatile and severe chemical processes before it could be refined into the final product but if you consume pure gold its not toxic, the same can be said for Fluoride, (Within minimal doses it isn't toxic)
@@Hawkeye_PC Unlike pure gold, fluoride is toxic. Dude, read your tube of toothpaste. lol
They do not process this industrial waste product to make it safe. Why did you make that up? lol
Check it out. ruclips.net/video/QzBytpUvNdA/видео.htmlsi=b9qyycREZuzurmHf
Yes, it is a major industrial toxic waste by product, that would cost billions to dispose of. But they sell it to our municipal water treatment plants to put it in the water! When you pay your water bill, you are paying for the pleasure of having toxic waste injected into your tap water. lol
ruclips.net/video/QzBytpUvNdA/видео.htmlsi=b9qyycREZuzurmHf
@@Hawkeye_PC Refined fluoride, such as pure sodium fluoride, which is in your toothpaste, IS TOXIC even though it is 99.9% pure. It's safe in the tube, but soon as you spread it around in your mouth the sodium fluoride will absorb into your blood via the gums. Where it gets into your brain and lowers your neurological function and intelligence. Not to mention,, other risks such as cancer. This is a good video for this subject; ruclips.net/video/GX0s-4AyWfI/видео.htmlsi=wyGs31hwmI8Lpblf
How's that new report jivin' with this??
Not every country puts fluoride in tap either, they just use fluoride paste, topically, as fluoride is supposed to be used topically & not ingested.
Long time no see
Love to watch sth from this channel again
It's the dose that makes the poison.
aged like absolute shit
Fluoride is no good, man. You need to cover more on this topic.
maybe a reupload of this video with some more precise information would be warranted based on the new studies coming out
When paused, the period and comma keys navigate frame by frame
02:34 OK... this video taught me something when I went in fully expecting to just hear a video essay on things I already know.
Well played, sir. Well played.
@@BaronVonQuiply turns out it does lower iq
Who ever reads this have a great day or night
Thats based, thanks bro. God bless you (imagine i put a gigachad gif here)
thanks man
Thx bro, have a great day too.
Thanks bro
Cheers mate night
This didn't age well... like the scientists who claimed 2nd hand smoke didn't cause any problems
I love how you can tell this guy’s on SSRIs from the affect and cadence of his speech.
What do you mean exactly? I can kind of see it to be honest, but what exactly makes you say that?
I skipped the intro but I’m assuming you still didn’t bring up fluorosis which I’ve heard multiple actual doctors talk about when it comes to modern problems with fluoride consumption
Source?
@@jjj123m Joseph nemeth
As you mention fluoreide makes tooth stronger, but only on surface. It is important to note that you must take fluoride while tooth is in development to affect the inner parts of enamel and dentin structure. So use it when you need it (mineralization proces) and don't overuse it and get stuck with fluoride stainings (which makes enamel structure more prone to abrasion (weird to take right?)).
Says who? All made up bull shit
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Actually our saliva repairs the tooth on it's own.
If we had natural diets without, GMO, pesticides and herbicides, we wouldn't have to worry about tooth decay.
@@encouraginglyauthentic43Actually the real cause of tooth decay is the excessive amount of sugar in our diets.
There isn't a strong correlation between Genetic modification, herbicides, or pesticides to tooth decay. You are just spewing nonsense.
@@petelee2477 That's why I said if we had natural diets.
GMOs, pesticides, and herbicides are not natural that's why I included them.
Thank you so much for providing the research in the description!
We should be bothered about microplastics
Study just came out saying it does lower it in children, by 2-5 points.
… at levels double the recommended limit
@@TebowTimeUmadYou drink so much water throughout the day that contains fluoride lol. Definitely above the recommended limit
@@naydsoe27 the recommended limit is based in milliliters per liter, so you would be doubling the recommended liters of water to hit that limit
That's assuming the only source you have is from tap water, which is a huge and incorrect assumption.
But also, yes... Anybody can easily be drinking double the amount of water right now. That's why the precautionary principle exists.
@@sebastianc5155 anything at a certain dose will kill you. what a stupid fucking question
actually using this for a science report at school. This actually helped thanks!
So 3x to 5x the amount of fluoride compared to the 1ppm (mg/l) US-drinking water standard can cause harm and possible even lower IQ in rats - that seems like a very low safety margin, since the amount of water we consume varies drastically. Imagine a worker who brews himself 4 liters of black tea with tap water everyday to rehydrate while working in summer..
I for one can't name anybody who literally drinks 3x more water than anyone else.
It's in processed food as well. In beer, soda pop, teas, etc. They use fluoridated water. And when they make cereal or many other food stuffs using fluoridated water, the fluoride remains in the product. The ADA calls this the "Halo Effect" because even people using well water will get dosed. Americans are getting more exposure.
Let alone, this lying clown pretends he doesn't know upping the exposures in studies is normal practice and does not disqualify the study or it's results.
@@Crawfishness anecdotes don’t change the evidence
How can rats have an iq, if knowing an iq requires taking a test? Taking an iq test measures how good you are at the iq test. Once again, how do you test a rats iq?
There's some fine hypocrisy here...
love the way you inserted Grade A under A in there. real subtle
I’m sorry, you were saying?
NEW YORK (AP) - A U.S. government report expected to stir debate concluded that fluoride in drinking water at twice the recommended limit is linked with lower IQ in children.
The report, based on an analysis of previously published research, marks the first time a federal agency has determined - “with moderate confidence” - that there is a link between higher levels of fluoride exposure and lower IQ in kids.
. . . let alone the (up to) 70 vaccines US-kids get until they are adults ! Very VERY VERY damaged adults !
You need to be more careful when making the distinction between "there's no evidence fluoride causes a decrease in IQ" and "there's evidence fluoride doesn't cause an increase in IQ."
The way I see it, pseudoscience is proof that ordinary people are trying to do science. That's a good thing. Their theories might be somewhat wrong but science is never completely correct. Do you think people always knew how things worked? No, of course not.. they had to figure it out themselves which is what these people are doing
So what your'e saying is all science is pseudoscience.
Yes, if that so-called "Science" is full of bias and personal preferences. Also, why even bother re-inventing the wheel, when others much more brilliant that you have already done the necessary researches and come up with results thousand times more accurate than you'll ever be able to conclude?
This is just a weak argument.
Sorry to be frank, but this is complete BS. The 'science' of pseudoscience is completely biased and immune to contradicting evidences. The proponents always have a fixed set of sources, of like minded social media posts, biased books and biased conmen. The proponents only receive information that suit their agenda and what goes well with their narratives. None of this aligns with scientific methodology. Science is not fully correct, yes, but the same science community itself correct itself when given contradicting evidence 🚶🏽♂️when Edwin Hubble discovered galactic red shift, steady state theory was rejected by science 🤷🏽♂️ is that the case of pseudoscience? Creationism, flat earth, astrology..... All are blindly followed and opposing arguments are received by deaf ears.
@@trestres236no, all science was pseudoscience at one point and eventually was refined by criticism and experimentation to become accurate. Miasma theory telling people to not poop in the water supply laid the grounds for germ theory to set up water treatment facilities.
@@koushuuhe’s saying that even tho they’re ignorant of the validity of more intelligent peoples work, they still have a grasp of invention and pursuit of progress.
It all depends on concentration. Many countries already have accelerated aging from excessive fluoride on drinking water, since it is hard to keep it in safe consistent levels without extensive monitoring and regulation.
That's some conspiracy talk. You must be a tinfoil hat wearer
Homie can have some source on that lol.
Kinda weird when you’re debunking your own conclusions but ok.. 🤷♂️
wait, so you admit that certain doses of fluoride DO in fact cause IQ/developmental problems, but you rate the "fluoride->low IQ" claim as 8/10 stupid? How so?
High doses of anything, can cause developmental problems.
The dose makes the poison.
Must be fluoride in his water
.... did you not pay attention to the video? it was very clearly laid out that the dosage that is added to water is way smaller than the dosage that causes developmental issues
@@ssword123 sure, generally the doses are way smaller. I do remember that in some remote cases, dosages were botched by the workers.
Therefore, the claim is not stupid in itself: it has a true foundation, but can be either applicable or not depending on the dosage pumped in a specific place during a specific time period. Most people can't even find out the dosages in their areas unless they test themselves.
@@ssword123Yes but what you’re not taking into account is the amount of other things we have on a daily basis that contains even more ppm of fluoride then what is just put in our water. Take the example of Phyllis Mullenix who ran the testing on rats some who had the fluoridated water and some who didn’t. What she found was that the rats who drank the fluoridated water were more likely to give birth to hyperactive babies with a lower iq then the rates who had non fluoridated water. A similar study was done only 5 years ago in Canada (the source I don’t know look it up) also found that in humans male offspring with mothers who drink fluoridated water come out hyperactive with lower iqs then those who drank non-fluoridated water while female offspring remained unaffected. In the end Phyllis was fired from her job for trying to change the public image of fluoride and her study was deemed invalid by her opposition because it contained more ppm then what the government put in the water. However it actually contained how many ppm of fluoride the average human has a day.
GET IT OUT OF MY BLOOD GET IT OUT OF MY BLOOD GET IT OUT OF MY BLOOD
Well.. to me the study of children being affected by fluoride exposition does have sort of a significance: even though the diluted fluoride did not present a correlation, the free fluoride amount did. When we study chemistry in school, we learn that fluorine is the most electromagnetic non-metal. Which means, if by any chance it gets free electrons while inside our organs or circular system, it may destabilize many proteins or cell structures, affecting its function. The animal body has a very complex built-in biochemistry that is all the time taking electrons without necessary providing one back in the same form : in general organic elements and some minerals have that (like calcium, which is very much needed). Another big problem of fluoride is that it is a combination with CALCIUM and fluorine. When this over exposition to calcium reaches specific organs, it may even be detrimental, such as leading to a calcification where it shouldn't. Be aware of what you consume.
Yes, fluoride is probably safe in a concentration of 1ppm, which IS the usual concentration of fluoride in drinking water. The rats were exposed to 5 times that, but we can also end up actually consuming as much. Fluoride is in everything, and just because we put 1ppm in our water, doesn't mean that is our total fluoride intake. A wide variety of foods and beverages as well as toothpaste also contain fluoride, which goes over the 1ppm limit in total. If you look into the history of fluoride, you will see that it is a toxic byproduct of aluminium production, and it literally melts concrete.
The idea that fluoride is completely harmless is one if not the greatest propaganda campaigns of history. Fluoride is a byproduct of aluminium production. It was considered completely useless before we found it's effect on teeth. Before this newfound use, ALCOA, an aluminium company in the US, tried it's best to avoid getting sued for unsafe practices linked to fluoride (hundreds of sick/dead workers due to fluoride and fluoride fumes every year). During WW2, the government needed fluoride and ALCOA obliged. This need for fluoride created a huge mess for both ALCOA and the government, but they were on the same side now because if fluoride was unsafe, the government would be to blame too. It is during this time that Frederick McKay (funded by ALCOA after they found out what he was doing) discovered fluoride's dental properties. ALCOA and the US govt jumped on this opportunity to make fluoride completely safe in the eyes of the public. It isn't a toxic substance that melts concrete and is used in nuclear bombs, it's a harmless chemical that makes your teeth white!
Frederick McKay ended up going against fluorisation at the end of his life.
TLDR: fluoride prevents caries and is safe at 1ppm in the drinking water. You are not consuming 1ppm of fluoride, probably much more. It was accepted in the public eye after a massive propaganda campaign by ALCOA and the government.
I don't think the government wants to dumb us all down, but I do think we are still living with the consequences of a scummy company not wanting to do the right thing and dispose correctly of it's waste. I do not see the problem with fluoride in toothpaste, but I think it is pretty dangerous in water because it spreads everywhere and you end up with unwanted concentrations of fluoride no matter what you do.
Concentration of how much fluoride they add is of little relevance if you cook with it, which boils off water leaving behind a higher concentration. The fact they add it at all is the problem, because everyone who knows about it doesn't want it except for the people addicted to the big brother kool-aid.
Blud said pseudoscience and didn’t debunk anything 🔥🔥🔥
Wonderful series, just finished it. I have a request. Can you please make a video to debunk antivaxxers? ❤
That twist at the end. Perfect!
Wait a minute. You're telling me that I've been using RUclips since day 1 and didn't realize K pauses videos?
Always great to see the fight against pseudoscience. Have you tackled Homeopathy? It's bound to get a 13 out of 10 on the stupid scale.
8:09 “when you account for creatinine the studies lose correlation” You don’t elaborate at all on what the hell that even means
Createnine is dependant on fluoride intake. So the author just tries to decieve and lie here. He himself does not know what he means, he just stole all the talking points.
@@haobinluI don’t think either of you know what creatinine is. Also give me a source
@@jjj123m I know what it is, the issue was verbal.
@@jjj123m RUclips deletes it. I cannot post links for some reason
"First off look at your sample" took me out 😂😂😂
2:22 dude, you are missing the actual hydroxy anions(OH-) in your pics. And that fluoroapatite cannot be correct as there is no way that 6 calciums and one fluorine can make a coordination complex that isn't so energetic that it wouldn't react with water or hydronium...
This is the worst type of propaganda. You gloss over things so quickly and make it seem like your point is accepted, but you completely failed to examine the ‘meta analysis’. The meta analysis ruled out many of the studies that showed a causal link between fluoride and impaired cognition without just cause. For example, the China study was discounted because ‘China has different values for fluoride’ and they live near mines? The people who live near mines were adjusted for because, hey, guess what? People in the western world also live and work in mines. They chose those areas to match western areas and then adjusted for different rates of fluoride in the water to do a comparative analysis.
Further the study in Scotland was discounted because it didn’t rule out other things in the water “like lead and arsenic”. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard in my life. I live in Scotland, and we have some of the cleanest drinking water in western society, commonly known for its low contaminants. They didn’t test for arsenic and lead, because it hasn’t been allowed in the water supply for over a hundred years..We aren’t living in the dark ages. They also didn’t test for plutonium and mercury. That is the most ridiculous reason to just casually write off almost every causal study.
Scottish water is often touted as some of the best drinking tap water in the world. UK. As a whole has fairly great tap water, but Scotland in particular is singled out in the uk as having the best by far, taken from mountain reservoirs and is at a much higher quality than bottled water. Ruling out the UK study showing a link to dementia, because they didn’t also test for contaminants that also aren’t in the water, is just fraud.
The recent court cases and changes to the EPA limit for the safe amount of fluoride that can be in drinking water and the fact that it is toxic…well… I guess this video is already BS for the above reasons
The Chinese study was discounted because there were interfering variables, as you yourself described --- China does not regulate waste from mines properly, and that waste includes a wide variety of heavy metals that, guess what, "reduce IQ," (not to mention, mine waste-water has fluoride in it.) So, a comparative analysis is not possible because they are not control groups for each other.
Why is this an issue? Just use fluoridated toothpaste. The fluoride in water is probably not harmful, but it doesn't really help either. And who knows, measuring IQ is not like measuring height - it's probably hard to detect small differences (you would need very highly powered studies to show a difference, if there is one). For babies and toddlers too young to know how to brush and spit, just brush regularly using non-fluoridated toothpaste. Tooth cleanings come with fluoride paste anyway and will do more for their enamel. And they don't have adult teeth yet. By the time they do, they'll be using fluoridated toothpaste.
IQ is also not a measure of intelligence, but of something like "drive."
Okay, ignore the evidence and the recent suggestion to lower recommended flourish from .7 to 1.2 to .7 or lower due to research indicating neurotoxicity
LMFAO so who's the conspiracy theorist now?
I thought the accusation was that fluoride hardens the pineal gland not that it lowers th IQ.
both
Moderation is key kids.
that’s right. toothpaste isn’t needed if you consume virtually no refined carbs and sugar. fluorine from food and not a tube where you have to use it 3x a day for the rest of your life (could this be consumerism?). if one lives in the cities water is fluorinated, and all consumable beverages.
Please address the differences between calcium fluoride and sodium fluoride when discussing the published research. I have read the scientific literature myself and in every case the study of benefits of fluoride are in reference to calcium fluoride. Sodium fluoride is always toxic, specifically neurotoxic. This is where the controversy and distrust of the government has come into play with regards to adding sodium fluoride to water/dental products.
The levels of sodium fluoride in water are not high enough to cause any detectable toxicity. If toxicity isn't detectable, it might as well not be at all.
"The average loss in IQ was reported as a standardized weighted mean difference of 0.45, which would be approximately equivalent to seven IQ points for commonly used IQ scores with a standard deviation of 15.* Some studies suggested that even slightly increased fluoride exposure could be toxic to the brain. Thus, children in high-fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low-fluoride areas. The children studied were up to 14 years of age, but the investigators speculate that any toxic effect on brain development may have happened earlier, and that the brain may not be fully capable of compensating for the toxicity."
Which study and where was this? I’m interested
@@mousasaab2652 Indeed.
I would probably be a genius then, because I had a lot and it made me age really fast.
@@benfurtado101 No, you're just a lazy ass
@@mousasaab2652
The only pseudoscience is this clown spewing lies to support the official narrative. Most likely, he is a psychopath paid to deceive people.
It is well established that fluoride lowers IQ. And causes neurological damage, which was well known long before fluoridation. lol Fluoride was and is used to make rat poison. lol Any product containing fluoride has a poison warning. Just read your tube of toothpaste. HAHA. But this low IQ clown will tell you its magically safe. Just trust him. HAHA.
His story of how fluoridation came to be, is laughably inaccurate. He uses the classic tell a different story, but ignore the true one completely. This lying clown down plays scientific studies and ignores others he must know exist.
If you wish to know the history of fluoridation, here is an award winning journalist who spent years researching the subject and wrote a book about it, The Fluoride Deception. It's a very good read. ruclips.net/video/Ly_QP4rGczo/видео.htmlsi=lf_S8LZnDaVUHFTD
didnt quite understand the point made on 8:13
why did the creatine disproofed the first point made??
also about the rats, it was certainly increased the quantity to see if there was a difference. small impact does mean no impact and it is difficult to measure small impacts
I actually learned a lot from this. Could you do one on whether sunscreen is dangerous? Been seeing a lot of heated debate on that
^
I have some kind of allergy or sensitivity that has my skin react poorly with traditional sunscreen generally, and that is sometimes the case. Because of that my dermatologist has recommended mineral sunscreen, which just uses minerals suspended in a non-comedogenic oil to block UV rays. I hope that might be helpful.
It’s just people with allergies not understanding what ingredients are actually doing
Well one problem with sunscreen is most people don't get enough vitamin D or realize how much you should actually get because the RDA is like 10% what you should really be getting just for maintenance, so sunscreen exacerbates vitamin D deficiency which ironically actually raises cancer risk for many types of cancer other than skin cancer which is the most common and treatable. You should get more like 10,000 IU's of vitamin D a day, and naturally you can produce up to 40,000 IU's and amounts near that are required for months just to correct a deficiency.
It's unlikely one would get skin cancer with consistent exposure to the sun where your skin produces enough melanin to protect itself, basically you just want to avoid burning. Another role melanin plays is regulating vitamin D, if you're deficient lower melanin means you'll get more vitamin D from the sun. Most people just don't get regular enough exposure to the sun to prevent burning hence sun screen. Even getting exposure almost naked during peak UV index as long as you're consistent should be fine, living in Minnesota I'd want to start in early May if possible when peak UV index is around 5 before it gets up to 9+ in summer. First time I was out in May I was out for 2 hours and got mild burns from that but by summer I could get an hour and not burn. It's not really correct to say the sun 'causes' cancer but it can act more like a catalyst, usually more needs to be wrong than inconsistent sun exposure.
Supplementing vitamin D just isn't the same as getting it from the sun, it just feels different, getting a vitamin D oil and rubbing it on your skin is actually more ideal than orally but it still isn't the same, I get most people don't have time between jobs during peak UV index and don't live out in the country like I do so it's not realistic. I'm lucky I can just wear shorts and go on barefoot walks in nature while I'm getting sun.
Another thing about sun screen that gets overlooked is even if all it has to block UV is zinc oxide, if it has nano particles that can absorb in the skin it could mess with your zinc levels which isn't good, which is why there's non-nano zinc oxide powder you can use to make your own sun screen, it'd probably save money just to make your own using the powder, coconut oil, shea butter, bees wax, ect. Coconut oil is probably fine for most and even by itself can help protect some, but bees wax would be to help if sweating a lot or in water.
I guess the way I see things like sun screen is that it's basically a way we came up with to deal with modern problems most people are dealing with that most of our ancestors didn't have, and it might work in some ways but is just introducing or exacerbating even more problems IMO than it's solving and most sun screen isn't even nearly as good as it could be from a health perspective and is mostly from companies that don't give a shit about public health to begin with.
It's actually very similar with dental hygiene, it's not nearly as required as people think for dental health. But because people are so deficient in things like vitamin D and in this case especially vitamin K2 and there's so much refined sugar exacerbating problems, it's become more necessary to prevent tooth decay. But it's really more of a problem with modern diets and food quality. I had a loose filling for several months where because I was making sure I'm getting enough important nutrients it didn't end up getting decayed, no visible decay at all in the x-ray when I finally got it fixed when it was around lock-down. It really helps if you do mostly keto but I wasn't even being all that strict on sugar or brushing the last 2 months. I have basically no enamel either from lots of soda growing up but still don't really get new cavities where I used to every visit to the dentist, never use fluoride either(not even at the dentist and I decline the polishing) and have well water with no fluoride other than what occurs naturally.
These are kind of like band-aid solutions that don't really fix the root of the problem and they make people a lot of money so there's incentive to deceive people.
They succeeded making people dumber! 😂
Academy of sciences report on fluoride for the EPA is worth a google
I was today years old when I learned that you can pause/resume a RUclips video with the K key.
I prefer using spacebar myself.
90 years ago: fluoride is good for your teeth
2022: Does Fluoride Lower IQ?
1990 steroids good for your muscles
2003 steroids bad for your health
Wtf do you mean hahaha
Or cigarettes good for women craving and now don't smoke pregnant ... To much fluoride man 😅😅
Fluoridated water is also used to process food. Can't that significantly increase fluoride salt contents in the food? If so, could eating fluoridated food AND drinking flouridated water approximate the high fluoride content of the rat study? Addition of food processed with fluoridated water and fluoridated water might lower cognitive functions. Fluoride from three meals plus snacks plus fluoridated water may approximate the 5 times concentrations in the rat study. Processed food uses municipal (fluoridated) water.
Probably explains why my iq is 31
I've heard that adding fluorine to water is bad because it calcifies the pineal gland, wich is used to regulate our sleep
I heard that too. I cannot find any sourses on it tho. And all science that has been done disagrees.
@@ThisChangeIsAwful There are animal studies which are not difficult to find indicating such. You could make the argument the animal studies are not applicable to humans, however it would be reasonable to assume fluoride does impact humans and the 'science' is corporate funded garbage much like the tobacco industry covering up the hazards of smoking.
Just because there are studies and meta-analysis of said studies does not make anything definitively true. This is one reason why someone really interested in science is extremely hesitant to make truth statements and why you shouldn't take the opinions of a random youtuber seriously.
It is a method of disposing of the toxic byproduct. People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Yes, the pineal gland is important for sleep hormones. But, as someone with an actual verified pineal cyst found on an MRI, that is quite large, I have zero issues with sleep. A little fluoride definitely won't disrupt your sleep.
The amount of people in here saying " well I heard "
My god pick up a book not called the bible. Fuck.
Wait a minute how were we able to land on the moon b4 cell phones exists with a live feed of someone standing outside of the moon recording the first step , which would make the cameraman with 7G internet thr first person on the moon.
were you picked at school for having that atrocious hairstyle? suits you very well
The reason why we haven't gotten rid of fluoride in the water, even though it costs money to put it in? It costs too much money to overhaul all the water treatment plants...
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Why add fluoride in the first place? Surely it’s just more logical to remove it considering?
Have you ever seen a Commie drink a glass of water?
Or ask fist or people are okk with it
thanks for compact information that you did.
Does fluoride lower your iq? No. Does watching Alex Jones lower your iq? Yes.
The only pseudoscience is this clown spewing lies to support the official narrative. Most likely, he is a psychopath paid to deceive people. I don't watch Alex Jones. Your statement is irrational. Perhaps, your IQ is low due to fluoride.
It is well established that fluoride lowers IQ. And causes neurological damage, which was well known long before fluoridation. lol Fluoride was and is used to make rat poison. lol Any product containing fluoride has a poison warning. Just read your tube of toothpaste. HAHA. But this low IQ clown will tell you its magically safe. Just trust him. HAHA.
His story of how fluoridation came to be, is laughably inaccurate. He uses the classic tell a different story, but ignore the true one completely. This lying clown down plays scientific studies and ignores others he must know exist.
If you wish to know the history of fluoridation, here is an award winning journalist who spent years researching the subject and wrote a book about it, The Fluoride Deception. It's a very good read. ruclips.net/video/Ly_QP4rGczo/видео.htmlsi=lf_S8LZnDaVUHFTD
Hell ya brother, I stopped drinking tap water and switched over to just soda and my IQ has increased significantly, now my kids actually want to spend time with me and my wife said she wants to get back together. I also got a promotion at the same time, all must be due to cutting out fluoride in my diet. I even started brushing my teeth with straight charcoal and my tonsils have been healthier than ever@@MasterLocke2007
1: If black tea has high levels of fluoride, explain British teeth.
2: I honestly just thought this nonsense came from Dr. Strangelove.
Well, he did say near the end that the efficacy of it is negligible.
Most of us have white tea. That's why we can't reap the benefits.
My guy, what if I live in a city that fluorinates their water and my 2 year old son also loves decaf sweet tea? Is he f**ked?
Obviously
Okay so I am super curious what the decaf sweet tea has to do with it
just use distilled water, also known as, pure water
8:09, what ,levels? I can't hear the word.
I read the thumbnail as "Does Florida lower IQ?"
It actually does
It does! Too hot for brain worky gud
The question is why F is still forced to be in the drinking water to everyone if we have better ways to prevent tooth decay (tooth paste, dental hygiene, flossing, regular yearly checks). Just keep water clean of this supplements ;)
You drink water way more than you brush your teeth or go to the dentist, which means that it all adds up and keeps your teeth good without you having to do much :)
Says the kid that brushes his teeth once a day instead of 3
Pray tell, what benefit can be gained by consuming fluoride? Especially since the evidence is clear, that fluoride can only benefit teeth via direct contact/ Thus ingestion can only help teeth as it passes by them via the mouth. Now, please explain, to what benefit does an infant receive from ingesting fluoride?, When they have no teeth to decay. Would it not make more sense to provide to the public, free of charge, fluoride mouthwash? Rather than forcing mass medication?
One more question, can eliminating one neurotoxin from your diet be worth it, even if there are millions of studies proving that toxin to be safe to ingest?
"can eliminating one neurotoxin from your diet be worth it, even if there are millions of studies proving that toxin to be safe to ingest?"
They literally actively try to reduce high fluoride levels, so this is already happening. Its arguably why there's not _enough_ fluoride in drinking water to fluoridate everyone's teeth properly.
"Rather than forcing mass medication?"
Is iron in cereal a kind of "mass medication?" There are many ways that food and drinks are altered to prevent the widespread malnutrition that began cropping up when people began processing food.
"Pray tell, what benefit can be gained by consuming fluoride? Especially since the evidence is clear, that fluoride can only benefit teeth via direct contact/ Thus ingestion can only help teeth as it passes by them via the mouth."
The point of fluoride in drinking water isn't to get you to ingest it, but to get it in contact with your mouth.
"Now, please explain, to what benefit does an infant receive from ingesting fluoride?"
None, but _toddlers_ receive a benefit since their newly exposed teeth are early in development, so they get an outsized benefit from fluoride exposure. It just so happens that the fluoride levels in water mandated by regulations are insufficient for that, apparently.
"Would it not make more sense to provide to the public, free of charge, fluoride mouthwash?"
Never heard of toothpaste?
Stronger teeth. That's it. And that's all you need.
@@Memus_Dreamus personally I would prefer a strong mind, unironic that point I made was obviously lost on...
@@d371midus Personally a strong mind is not necessary. Because even the strongest of mind can be stopped if you bite through them with strong teeth.
You can always tell when someone's gonna be weird when they say pray tell. You closed your eyes when reciting this out loud before typing, right?
Best plot twist in history
Yes it does. Proof? My IQ.
People in the comments conveniently forget that they also piss out extra fluoride.
I'm sorry if I have functioning kidneys.
Regardless of how you feel about fluoride, adding any type of drug into the water supply isnt right. I never consented to that, and neither did millions of other people.
Well that's good to know since I drink a lot of tea. I guess it's good I stopped using fluoridated mouthwash, and use a water pitcher filter that removes fluoride. I actually use toothpaste with hydroxy-apatite for remineralizing my teeth, but I'm getting fluoride from tea as well, it appears.
Fluoride lowers iodide status and hence thyroid function. And low thyroid function has an impact. There are better microminerals to prevent dental decay snd better diets than either the "Mediterranean" diet or the "Pyramid" diet. 0:35
Well sure.. if you take like 10 times the amount of it in drinking water daily for years.
@@peppermintgal4302 Really? Some drink 3X what the sedentary drink, then added in toothpaste and other sources plus realize the dispensing equipment often over doses the drinking water. I drive quite a lot, I see a public that is seriously retarded in how they drive.
@@peppermintgal4302 I'll suggest you do a Perplexity search on the topic and not a Google search. Avoid Google brain as it does evil😆
Though I have nothing against fluoride or fluoridated water, they did have a point against involuntary medication by the government. I can agree with that on principle and would be concerned about that precedent. But it's hard to have a nuanced opinion like that, especially in the current day.
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
When you don't have a life and keep commenting and replying with the same copypasta.
Thanks Study from the sugar industry.
I guess it is a hoax but I also heard that fluoride can accumulate in the body over time by fluoride consumption.
That's because fluoride is never supposed to be consumed as there is no medical condition for a "hypofluorosis" as it's not a nutrient. Some real bullshit
Well fluoride can be bad for bones in chronic exposure. But that is more of an occupational hazard concern. (Yours truly can indeed be concerned about this)
People aren't concerned much on the natural Fluoride found in caves and such. People want to know about the byproduct fluoride, ( hexafluorosilicic acid (HFSA) that is not in nature and infact a toxic man made molicule. It is a chemical by-product of aluminum, steel, cement, phosphate, and nuclear weapons manufacturing. Before the public was convinced that adding fluoride to their water was for their own good, the metal and chemical industries had the problem of disposing of their highly toxic fluoride waste.
Like he explained that it binds to the teeth enamel, it binds to bones too, slowly releasing over time.
Can you make a video how eye bags exist or about them in general
Who is back? I don't want to have to guess. I'm no good at guessing.
If it's any consolation, the science guy is named "Dr. Q"...so Dr. Q is back. Sleep well tonight
It’s so funny that the anti-fluoride crowd also like to promote drinks such as black tea, a beverage that is much higher in fluoride from the plants absorbing minerals from the soil than any municipal water supply.
5:08. fluorines properities were well known before G.Bush. Again the academy of sciences report for the EPA is the de facto book on humans and fluorine compounds. from a toxicologist or chemists point of view. RUclips don' like linx out of the bubble. so best to google that.
Eii, make a video on ozone therapy, I can't figure out if it is a pseudoscience or if it is true...
This is gonna be crazy and only a couple people will get it but does 2:56 remind anyone else of Maniac Mansion on NES?