One hundred years from now aspiring game devs will be religiously watching chronicles of riddick on their 3d projectors expecting it to make them a better game dev, and not realize why it's not helping them. That's the downside of taking advice from a machine. If they had asked a real human they'd know It's not helping because it only works if you're watching it on VHS.
I once worked with a partner who disagreed with me on diversity in game content. He said we had enough minigames. I told him that minigames were rad actually and that we didn't have enough of them. I went on to then ignore the memory leaks I was told to fix and program a minigame where you bake a little pizza for various cute rodents. Unfortunately I accidentally used official art for one of the creatures from palworld and we got hit with a C&D. So to answer the question, yes. This is how I'd approach trolling such questions, but the song quotes are fun! Also, very clearly every question is "You've been faced with a problem regarding [keyword]. How do you react?"
I love that even in the middle of your video rant, you start digressing and end up teaching really valuable design insights XD The big corporations that try to unknowingly make people train their models for free and then profit from it are despicable. Thank you for bringing attention to this issue and fighting back! The only AI models I can honestly support are the open-source ones, since everyone can benefit from them, not just the greedy corporations.
Yeah I don’t think AI Gen is inherently bad (beyond the current ecological issues and lack of consent in training) but this is just another extension of the lack of consent problem. They’ve had us training them for years through those captchas where you tell them which characters are in the scanned printout, I think.
@@IndieGameClinic Yeah, I have also suspected the same about captchas for years, haha XD I'm pretty sure we Internet users have trained some really strong (*closed source*) OCR models, for free.
This is the second video of yours I've watched and the value is just incredible. I love how you have the layer of design criticism that covers LinkedIn as a platform and corporate strategy itself, and then you have asides about individual questions where you just hand out great analysis almost as a bonus. Entertaining and useful. Thanks for doing what you do!
"I think this questions were generated by AI" you think?! LinkedIn, like most recent platforms, have been enshtfied. Although linkedin already had its fate sealed when it tried to become "social media for professionals"
@@rd-um4sp it’s so bad. The worst things it does are like, use the concept of “notifications” from other socmed to try and push ads. Half my inbox is paid ads and then it “notifies” me as if someone actually sent me a personal PM. Hate it hate it hate it.
It hasn't been "enshtfied". It has always been this way. I remember when it came out, my mother kept having tantrums about it sending her multiple emails a day even though she had never had an account. It just spammed her constantly because people she knew shared their entire address book when they signed up probably by mistake because of it's awful UI.
Love this. Keep it coming. Maybe use, some Dr.Seuss. Here is one for your young channel: Kid, you’ll move mountains! Today is your day! Your mountain is waiting. So get on your way!
How do you synergy your team productivity management solutions while navigating feedback responsibly when you democratize your web 3.0 family ecosystems every quarterly earnings returns?
For those who want to do this, but don't want to put the energy into selecting beautiful passages from the works of Mr. Wu Tang, using another LLM to answer these questions will help poison the data far more efficiently, and be very difficult for Linkedin to sort from valid inputs (unlike copyrighted works).
This stuff is hilarious. Also kind of reminds me of what artists are doing to AI image scrapers by using tools like nightshade to poison their images, and in turn the AI's Datasets as well...
Haha great video, I've been getting spammed these types of questiosn tha last few months and I've always ignored them because they didnt really make 100% sense. Glad to see I'm not the only one who thought its some AI training bs
Truly, thank you for your contribution to hive mind. "Sort of swings & round abouts isn't it?" 😂 Always appreciate the colorful use of language, from America
Haha when i watched this back I did wonder if that idiom would translate 😂. I don’t even know if there is a similar phrase. “Six of one, half a dozen of the other”, I suppose.
The only clever approach would be to plug in another AI to generate useless answers. Anything else is wasting time and creating brain rot in your own brain.
Commenting for reach! What i also dislike is that linkedin isn't very upfront with what it actually plans to do with all those answers and "expert opinions".
It is wasting your time, as they will just use another AI to filter out your implausible gibberish. And of course the "questions" are already AI generated. In fact their only goal might be to keep you "engaged" so you can view more of their ads on their useless site.
Maybe a bit, but "sanitizing" data by using AI will inevitably lead to either false positives (flagging real answers as fake), or false negatives (flagging meme answers as true), so it still means a decrease in the quality of the answers by the AI. Even if they didn't use AI to vet the answers though, it means you're wasting the time of their employees in the process of sanitizing, once again. So it probably wastes their time and money as well ;3
If I made a AI that program design and produce video games from just a few prompts THE LAST people I would give it to are the AAA developers. They have the tiniest imaginations in existence.
I don't think that's really true. AAA simply means the highest costing games [its a term from the financial industry] and the games made are the way they are because companies tend to be risk averse with that much money to spend. If you find AAA games uninteresting then I can assure you it's not the "developers" who are making the dull, uncourageous decisions about overall direction. 90% of the people in those companies have great ideas which are held back by risk averse management. Don't think that this being in Indie Games channel means I'm a hater of AAA games. I know that might be the case on regular gamer-commentary channels, but as a game developer I have a decent understanding of why AAA games are the way they are and I don't think "indie is better than AAA" is a particularly interesting or productive conversation. Many AAA games are uninspired and boring, precisely because so much money is involved and they have to sell to the broadest player base. I feel the same way about Marvel movies. But I don't have any dislike for anyone working on either type of media product. The shape of the product is just something that happens with large budgets, and not the result of workers being unskilled or having poor taste.
@ Many AAA game studios lack a significant amount of creativity not because they are inherently limited. Because the stakes and risk are too high to waste the millions of dollars they’re investing into whatever game they’re producing. Sure some AAA studios are creative but by a large they are just remasters of the concepts and mechanics invented by other developers. Nothing wrong with that tbh but if AI is invented that could take a rough concept and refine it like the AAA developers can they would basically be out of a job. Probably in that case AAA studios would break into thousand of smaller more creative studios and have a central AI model they heavily invest into. *I don’t hate AAA games I’m just very unsatisfied with their direction as of late. I believe they’ve held the gaming industry back with their wait and see never me approach.
One hundred years from now aspiring game devs will be religiously watching chronicles of riddick on their 3d projectors expecting it to make them a better game dev, and not realize why it's not helping them. That's the downside of taking advice from a machine. If they had asked a real human they'd know It's not helping because it only works if you're watching it on VHS.
Unironically the plot of Ready Player One?
5:27 Glad to know that I was on the right track by standing over my playtesters while quietly using my phone to write down everything they were doing.
There are definitely different types of playtesting, but this is the best type for testing comprehension and enjoyment of new ideas, for sure.
Answering ai prompt training with memes is not just funny but also beneficial in the long run by giving the ai brainrot.
@@Kofhiliphus I can’t believe thou wouldst describe the Wu Tang Clan as brainrot.
Ah yes, please do unpaid labour so my massive corporation can make you obsolete. Truely the second enlightenment is upon us!
I once worked with a partner who disagreed with me on diversity in game content.
He said we had enough minigames. I told him that minigames were rad actually and that we didn't have enough of them.
I went on to then ignore the memory leaks I was told to fix and program a minigame where you bake a little pizza for various cute rodents.
Unfortunately I accidentally used official art for one of the creatures from palworld and we got hit with a C&D.
So to answer the question, yes.
This is how I'd approach trolling such questions, but the song quotes are fun!
Also, very clearly every question is "You've been faced with a problem regarding [keyword]. How do you react?"
@@endorb I like your approach; the “Grandpa Simpson” approach.
Generated by LLMs ... Generated by MBAs ... I don't know if I could tell them apart, when it comes to synergizing the win-win out of the park.
I love that even in the middle of your video rant, you start digressing and end up teaching really valuable design insights XD
The big corporations that try to unknowingly make people train their models for free and then profit from it are despicable. Thank you for bringing attention to this issue and fighting back!
The only AI models I can honestly support are the open-source ones, since everyone can benefit from them, not just the greedy corporations.
Yeah I don’t think AI Gen is inherently bad (beyond the current ecological issues and lack of consent in training) but this is just another extension of the lack of consent problem. They’ve had us training them for years through those captchas where you tell them which characters are in the scanned printout, I think.
@@IndieGameClinic Yeah, I have also suspected the same about captchas for years, haha XD I'm pretty sure we Internet users have trained some really strong (*closed source*) OCR models, for free.
data diddling on a new level : kudos :)
This video will definitely end up being referenced in school books decades later in the AI chapter x)
This is the second video of yours I've watched and the value is just incredible. I love how you have the layer of design criticism that covers LinkedIn as a platform and corporate strategy itself, and then you have asides about individual questions where you just hand out great analysis almost as a bonus. Entertaining and useful. Thanks for doing what you do!
@@AAASimulator-z1u thank you, I’m glad people get value from this kind of stuff. It feels like a goof from my end!
Fighting back against theft isn't petty, it's just basic human decency
"I think this questions were generated by AI" you think?!
LinkedIn, like most recent platforms, have been enshtfied. Although linkedin already had its fate sealed when it tried to become "social media for professionals"
@@rd-um4sp it’s so bad.
The worst things it does are like, use the concept of “notifications” from other socmed to try and push ads. Half my inbox is paid ads and then it “notifies” me as if someone actually sent me a personal PM. Hate it hate it hate it.
It hasn't been "enshtfied". It has always been this way. I remember when it came out, my mother kept having tantrums about it sending her multiple emails a day even though she had never had an account. It just spammed her constantly because people she knew shared their entire address book when they signed up probably by mistake because of it's awful UI.
Love this. Keep it coming. Maybe use, some Dr.Seuss.
Here is one for your young channel:
Kid, you’ll move mountains! Today is your day! Your mountain is waiting. So get on your way!
Just add the Auron quote, it flows very well just after...
@ nice
Cackling out loud in my living room like a madman at this. Beautiful work. Thank you for your service
WU TANG CLAN AIN’T NOTHIN’ TO FUCK WITH
How do you synergy your team productivity management solutions while navigating feedback responsibly when you democratize your web 3.0 family ecosystems every quarterly earnings returns?
For those who want to do this, but don't want to put the energy into selecting beautiful passages from the works of Mr. Wu Tang, using another LLM to answer these questions will help poison the data far more efficiently, and be very difficult for Linkedin to sort from valid inputs (unlike copyrighted works).
This stuff is hilarious.
Also kind of reminds me of what artists are doing to AI image scrapers by using tools like nightshade to poison their images, and in turn the AI's Datasets as well...
Haha great video, I've been getting spammed these types of questiosn tha last few months and I've always ignored them because they didnt really make 100% sense. Glad to see I'm not the only one who thought its some AI training bs
@@rado_pk1047 I definitely answered a few seriously before I was like HANG ON
My respect for you after this video 📈
@@supersonic_kai_99 that’s a 350% increase!
Truly, thank you for your contribution to hive mind.
"Sort of swings & round abouts isn't it?" 😂 Always appreciate the colorful use of language, from America
Haha when i watched this back I did wonder if that idiom would translate 😂. I don’t even know if there is a similar phrase. “Six of one, half a dozen of the other”, I suppose.
Genuinely thought this is a Harry DuBois cosplay
my life is Harry DuBois cosplay
Don't know if it was intentional but I'm only like, 16 seconds in, and the grey jacket + pink tie is giving ethical scammer Reigen vibes
I had to Google them 🥲
The most dystopian shit I have seen in the long time..
Giving the Ai brain rot. Love this 😂
@@vincev4630 these skibidi community questions are really insight-pilled
The only clever approach would be to plug in another AI to generate useless answers. Anything else is wasting time and creating brain rot in your own brain.
the hero we dont deserve but need!
Commenting for reach! What i also dislike is that linkedin isn't very upfront with what it actually plans to do with all those answers and "expert opinions".
It is wasting your time, as they will just use another AI to filter out your implausible gibberish. And of course the "questions" are already AI generated. In fact their only goal might be to keep you "engaged" so you can view more of their ads on their useless site.
Maybe a bit, but "sanitizing" data by using AI will inevitably lead to either false positives (flagging real answers as fake), or false negatives (flagging meme answers as true), so it still means a decrease in the quality of the answers by the AI. Even if they didn't use AI to vet the answers though, it means you're wasting the time of their employees in the process of sanitizing, once again. So it probably wastes their time and money as well ;3
@@RyebuckCoppercap But by implementing this function they are already wasting their own time without need to waste yours.
retention at any cost, even ai slop now.
If I made a AI that program design and produce video games from just a few prompts THE LAST people I would give it to are the AAA developers. They have the tiniest imaginations in existence.
I don't think that's really true.
AAA simply means the highest costing games [its a term from the financial industry] and the games made are the way they are because companies tend to be risk averse with that much money to spend. If you find AAA games uninteresting then I can assure you it's not the "developers" who are making the dull, uncourageous decisions about overall direction. 90% of the people in those companies have great ideas which are held back by risk averse management.
Don't think that this being in Indie Games channel means I'm a hater of AAA games. I know that might be the case on regular gamer-commentary channels, but as a game developer I have a decent understanding of why AAA games are the way they are and I don't think "indie is better than AAA" is a particularly interesting or productive conversation.
Many AAA games are uninspired and boring, precisely because so much money is involved and they have to sell to the broadest player base. I feel the same way about Marvel movies. But I don't have any dislike for anyone working on either type of media product. The shape of the product is just something that happens with large budgets, and not the result of workers being unskilled or having poor taste.
@ Many AAA game studios lack a significant amount of creativity not because they are inherently limited. Because the stakes and risk are too high to waste the millions of dollars they’re investing into whatever game they’re producing. Sure some AAA studios are creative but by a large they are just remasters of the concepts and mechanics invented by other developers.
Nothing wrong with that tbh but if AI is invented that could take a rough concept and refine it like the AAA developers can they would basically be out of a job.
Probably in that case AAA studios would break into thousand of smaller more creative studios and have a central AI model they heavily invest into.
*I don’t hate AAA games I’m just very unsatisfied with their direction as of late. I believe they’ve held the gaming industry back with their wait and see never me approach.
Don't be flattered. I get those questions and I have never completed a game...
You might not know it yet, but you are the Chosen One.
keith burgun summoned
@@hendazzler uh oh
to be fair, they want us to the questions for free, so were just giving them for free.
"You get the advice you paid for" and all that
Another week, another impending, trashy AI feature that only an investor could love.