Cop Tries to Order Guy Around but the Man Won't Take It and Stands Up to Him
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- Subscribe and hit the Notification Bell to join me on this series about police encounters and true crime! I talk about wild and mind-boggling cases that really get into what makes people tick, and the crazy stuff that goes on both in the law enforcement and the criminal world.
I share cool stories and interesting facts. The purpose of the videos is educational and informative. Through my commentary I try to provide you with insights or lessons to explore and think about. So, if you like crime mysteries, police stories, and law enforcement encounter analysis, you'll find something awesome here. Stay in the loop and follow the channel!
#truecrime #crime #criminalpsychology #crimeandpunishment #truecrimecommunity #court #criminal #justice #courtroom #police #missingpersons #cops #viral #shorts
Please support original creators by checking out their channels, showing them some love and bringing awareness to their vids.
Tulare County Cop Watch - • 🔵🔴What To Do When Appr...
Fair Use Notice - This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, education, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
Legal Notice - This video is not, and should not be mistaken for legal advice. Always contact an attorney for legal counsel.
The two biggest threats to cops: Video recording and a person that knows their rights.
Way to much power.
Not really. Anyone can disregard your rights and steal and destroy your camera/evidence. Just sayin...
And the Miranda warning
Louisiana is trying to pass a law forbidding recording cops. This is what Marshall law looks like.
@@darscasselare the cops suddenly bulletproof or will they hit the ground the same as a private citizen?
"We can argue this in the courts" is exactly why qualified immunity shouldn't exist
Exactly
I want to like this twice
It will ruin your life, sitting in jail. Lose your job and damage your credentials.
No cuz the cop is in the wrong u would get a huge amount of money if u somehow stumbled in court.@@kellenfurter
@@kellenfurter going through this as we speak it's such bullshit..
He’s willing to waste the court’s time because of his ego!
He gets payed either way. No concern of his.
We can argue in court, yeah because when you lose it's not coming out of your wage packet, TYRANT!!!!!
Argue before the judge?? The judge would verbally undress this prick.
Nope he is willing to bully because he knows there will be no repercussions (to him).
oh yeah bro but we know this cop is going to get it at court
Best thing about these things is that they are so confident in their incompetence.
Dunning Krueger 😂
It's not incompetence. They know the law and your rights. They're hoping you do not
No actually it's the worst thing
The reason you don’t see any legal action against police officers is because the videos are edited for dumb A$$es and not the full or real stop!
Cop is a huge future liability.
Bruh you know both his mother and S/O hide when he comes home.
No that cop is the future of all law enforcement once they finish up chipping away at the constitution.
At least he didn't try continuing anything once he was told by the other officer that he's wrong and he even addressed him as sir after. Better then most of these bad cops you see online 😂
Cops should be taught the law better clearly though.
not really tho, he was wrong but when he was told he was wrong, he left and wasnt a total dik about it.
And a major reason why cops are disliked.
This cop got owned
He needs to not be allowed to be a cop
The idiot cop spoke like a used car salesman, 100% belief in the crap he's spewing from his mouth, and he's wrong about all of it.
Sico's become cops$$$$$$$$$$
Owned so hard he now gets reparations.
@@user-el4qz1iv7z Bro...is that really how you think psycho is spelled? lol
Also, 's is not used to make a word plural...ever.
He forgot the part about having reasonable suspicion of the COMMISSION OF A CRIME
They AWAYS conveniently omit that part.
And too many people don’t call them on that omission
Reasonable AND ARTICULABLE!
He didn't forget.
@@Warrior_Resisting_Colonialism this
Half of the truth is still a lie.
Reasonable suspicion, and being suspicious are two different things.
Exactly!!!! I thought exactly the same thing when the cop said he was suspicious but couldn’t articulate the suspected crime. It’s scary that any cop in the country wouldn’t understand the distinction.
@@shanecrump7932 I'm sure he knows the difference, he's just hoping to throw a bunch of words out and the guy gets confused enough to think he's in the wrong.
@@psychochicken9535 Exactly 💯
And "reasonable suspicion" isn't RAS if they are not able to articulate what crime they are reasonably suspicious of
A Cops worse enemy is not a criminal.... it's an educated citizen😂
The people are NOT the enemy ...That's the problem ,when cops treat every day citizens like criminals who broke the law when they are doing LAWFUL THINGS ........
ALEX
I ❤ your comment , You are absolutely right 😂 ,...
Sincerely
Michelle
Don't see anyone educated being a citizen. Citizen is nothing more than government property.
@@johannacannata1090two areas police dont patrol, wealthy communities and high crime communities and the majority of people charged and convicted of crimes has no victims, meaning no crime was committed.
@@chrispreston256 Ok I will correct that!
A Cops Worse Enemy Is An Educated Piece Of Government Property.
This is the result of when your costume goes to your head.
"Mission Accomplished", GI Joke
He was told to do this at least he walked away and said have a good day he has to do his job Wich includeed making shit up
@@aaronflores21af what are you smoking?
He practices before every shift in front of his mirror
What a Dill weed!
reasonable suspicion of suspicion that you're suspicious. Copspeak.
Lol lol 🤣 good one 👍
@@jamesharbin9074 Yes, this officer determined that it is suspicious to be lawfully recording!
The fact knowing your rights is threatening to an officer shows how corrupt our systems have become
Actually it's always been this way for FBA'S ie foundational black Americans
If recording is suspicious, every news crew needs accosted
Lol they do accost them, that's why these people had to start going out and recording.
Recording the jails is suspicious regardless of being legal or not.
The thing is they need reasonable articuable suspicion of a specific crime. Yes it's suspicious and warrants them looking into it. And asking for ID is fine. But detaining someone or forcing them to provide the ID if they refuse is not. If the suspicious person chooses to not identify or answer question then the cop needs to investigate another way. And if they can't get RAS of a specific crime there is nothing they can do.
After George Floyd nearly every state in South has made it illegal to film cops without massive separation, even during protests cops singled out reporters the cops are not your friends or buddies they have one goal and that's to arrest as many possible threats to their power that they can
If recording is suspicious, they need to investigate themselves 🤣🤣🤣
The cop saying "Yes Sir" at the end after being dismissed was the cherry on top.
Folded like a house of cards...
He’s even dumber than he looks
Least he was humble enough to know he was wrong
I like that he took it and didn't let it affect his attitude. If more cops acted like him, we wouldn't have such issues. Keep it professional, not personal.
@@plasticnapalm5869? You mean act a certain way when they’re corrected?
If he wasn’t corrected he’d probably abuse his power more on this guy…
I hate when cops say 'we're going to have to agree to disagree....so just follow my orders'
That is low key saying fuck off already…….
What a minute how did he know the other cops name
@@Teah8cbdude because the 'theres good cops and bad cops' fallacy is a lie. If there's good cops and bad cop, then there can't be bad cops because the good cops would arrest them
That's because they have almost total power and absolutely no accountability. And they know it.
I love this. All the auditors are making the world safer from aggressive cops. A few years ago this would have ended differently. Keep up the good work.
Suspicion is not a crime. It isn't "reasonable suspicion". It's "reasonable suspicion OF A CRIME"!!
Reasonable AND ARTICULABLE!
@@gaoxiaen1 yep, duh! 🤪
And reasonable can ONLY come from "a person of reasonable judgement", meaning how the average person on the street would look at the situation, NOT how a tyrant sees things.
"Reasonable suspicion" is like being "a little bit pregnant"....
@@mijimonmaster Correct - you are adjudged guilty ("suspicious") until you prove your innocence.
You are the boat he is riding on for this fishing expedition!
I'd tell him that if we argue this in court, it will be a federal court, and you will be the defendant.
And he'll laugh at what you have to pay the lawyer. And determine dollar damages for being butt hurt.
@@michaelkatz7862 It would be Criminal court, the attorney would be the US Attorney for the district. The criminal complaint is filed with the FBI. Wouldn't cost me anything.
@@michaelkatz7862 Read Title 18 USC 242.
@@michaelkatz7862wow, you are not just wrong. But stupid too
@@michaelkatz7862you're definitely an uneducated cop
“ is suspicious a misdemeanour or a felony” that was the best comeback!😂😂😂😂
To me, this encounter exposes something much worse than a cop who is ignorant of the law. The officer’s behavior makes clear that he DOES know the law, but doesn’t care about the law, and so, is going to violate it just the same. Telling the citizen, you’ll just have to take me to court, because I’m going to knowingly violate your Constitutional rights. Ignorance can be fixed via education. A tyrannical mind-set, on the other hand, can’t be. It reveals this cop to be irredeemably unfit for the job of law enforcement officer, and he bears strong firing.
It's not the law, it's court decisions. Those determine parameters. If it's law, how do you know city council there didn't pass a law saying it's ok?
It should be grounds for firing, because he's clogging the courts with frivolous charges and he probably doesn't even show up for half of the court dates...but because of the permissive culture of the police, these authoritarian behaviors persist
@michaelkatz7862 do what? I'll try to make this easy for you. A cop has to say you're under reasonable suspicion of a real crime. Soo "you're under suspicion of committing terrorist activities" but the cop never said that. He just said "suspicious "
Furthermore a "state" cannot superseded the constitution. It's a big argument over 2A because states are violating the constitution. But freedom of speech, press, etc is 1A and has yet to be fucked with. Speaking of 2A alot of states are "constitutional carry" now.
Unfortunately he is exactly what they wanted "an ENFORCER"
It is the "I am the law" attitude!
"You're dismissed Valenzuela"
"Yes sir"
Honestly, once he realized he was wrong he seemed to be pretty professional.
@@RoyArrowood yea good point - different vibe than most. Bad education, for sureeee
Someone who works for a living isn't a "sir".
@@emiliogonzalez9555❓
Care to elaborate?
@@emiliogonzalez9555"sir" doesn't describe position of power or social status like it did many many years ago. It's a sign of respect or term of endearment. Touch some grass and get with the times
They hire EXACTLY who they intend to hire, people.
And those 'people' should learn our right's.
Yep..subservient " order followers."
You do know that these people come from the average?
@@roy-cm4wo they do a psyc test they know what they hire
@@roy-cm4wo It doesn't mean your standards can't be higher...
"You're dismissed, Valenzuela!" LMFAO 😂
Reasonable suspicion OF A CRIME.. not suspicion of suspiciousness
Reasonable suspicion of being suspicious? That's a new one!
Yeah that threw me off I don't know of that either I'm wondering about that one did I miss something about the law or something
Nope fella get away and leave him alone. Stuoid bluffing cop.
I get annoyed when the auditor does not correct the officer by completing the phrase : Reasonable suspicion.... OF A CRIME!!!
How dare you stand up for & know your basic rights!
If you're incompetent in most other jobs, you're FIRED. It boggles my mind that incompetence in law enforcement is "ok".
Especially when they carry weapons!
"we're going to agree to disagree" are never words that should come out of a cop's mouth.
The reason you don’t see any legal action against police officers is because the videos are edited for dumb A$$es and not the full or real stop!
Truly disgusting how many cops try to violate people's rights.
I have a feeling it's quite a few.
Always film the police.
ALWAYS.
I love how confident he is in his wrongness 😂
Reasonable. Suspicion. Of. A. CRIME!!!!
Articulated suspicion.
Huge difference.
A hole!! He shouldn't be a cop!! Then he walks away like he didn't do anything!
So you’re gonna call him a hole? Out of everything he’s just a hole, I’d call him an asshole at least. Idk what’s so offensive about being just a hole, but what do I know
Yet an "attempt" at a crime is punishable. THIS WAS AN ATTEMPT!
@@gaoxiaen1.. by the cop.? If you’re talking about the citizen what crime was he attempting exactly.?😂 filming on public property of public property is not only legal, but it is a protected first amendment activity. There was no attempted any crime, except for by the police officer, trying to violate this man’s rights and force him to ID because of some arbitrary feeling that he had.
@@wickedliquid1177 An attempt by the cop to violate a citizen's civil rights. If the other cop didn't intervene, then it would be a conspiracy.
yes, it was a crime committed by the cop. he violated his oath, which is treason!@@gaoxiaen1
Pupils,rapid blinks,fast paced speech ..that cop is HIGH
He's definitely tweaking
Not high, he hasnt smoked anything, im pretty sure thats Amphetamine or maybe MDMA 😅
His palms are sweaty, knees week,arms are heavy....
Moms spraghetti @@shaltoloki6226
@ZEiTLOZ cops don't do mdma, they do meth and coke
Atleast whn he was told he backed down an didnt take it personal or act unprofessionally so hats off to you both!
This cop is determined to violate people. He's picked up enough to know what he's doing.
Drake got dissed so badly he became a crooked cop
OPRESSION UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW IS A FELONY
They literally must spend months trying to teach how to sound "smart for a cop"
"Suspicious" is not a reasonable suspicion of a crime. If there's no crime or misdemeanor, there's nothing.
Embarrassing Valenzuela!!!
I'm glad you made him do the walk of shame.
Embarrassing Venezuela????? Did you know what have they done in new York???
Should have filed charges for harassment
"is it illegal" "no but I suspect that you're doing it" "so your suspicion is that you think I'm doing something that's perfectly legal and you need to find out why?"
Yea, why? What's the purpose of filming the jail? Why is that a hard question to answer? If it was normal then we all would be constantly filming our sounding all the time with our phones out or cameras. That's not normal
@@blakefloerchinger3415Normal doesn't factor into legality. Unless you think we should arrest people just got being different.
@@mrca9344 reasonable suspension in anything that is out of baseline of normal, based on personal experience and training. People being different has nothing to do with that it's reasonable for people to be different which can be normal in a lot of cases. All I'm saying is it's not normal to film a sensitive location without a valid reason. Asking what the purpose of filming a sensitive location is just as legal as filming in public so if you don't give a valid and reasonable answer then expect to be watched right back. This type of activity is antagonising in nature and definitely calls for further investing to determine if a threat is imminent. Something that I think we can both agree on here is that cops do need more social training and proper ways to conduct counter surveillance and avoid escalating unnecessarily.
@@blakefloerchinger3415 Yeah that's the entire point. Abnormality is not criminality. Criminality is what warrants detainment and investigation. Cops NEED to learn this. It's not antagonizing to test cops this way. They could simply sit back and watch, but they keep going out of their way to violate rights. With all these vids of this happening, it's clear intent by cops to continue violating people's rights. That's antagonizing
@@mrca9344 so what your saying is your in favor of cops sitting back and doing absolutely nothing and potentially being bullet sponges because your rights are being pressed? That's hill to die on I guess. Cops do not need to be tested by the public, they need to be held accountable for bad deeds and the qualified immunity needs to be rewritten or dropped not abbused. Actual bad cops that are imposing on your rights are out there but this isn't one of them, being questioned about your actions is not taking you into custody or harming your rights. If that were the case we would all be suing each other to oblivion. Can you imagine coming into work and your boss stopping you to ask why you're 15 minutes late and then you say "I PLEAD THE 5TH!" 😂, probably not a good example but it's close.
Instead of causing more issues for our men and women in uniform how about we tactfully come up with solutions that work. Here's some, more funding for better equipment, longer more practical training, quarterly psychological testing, DROP QUALIFIED IMMUNITY, free and easy access to mental health care for everyone (cops, firefighters, paramedics, general public), Incentives to do more community services to better law enforcement and community relationships, a see something say something law that punishes public service members for not reporting corruption or bad deeds within their organisations. My list can go on and on.
Ugh.... constitutionaly protected activity CAN'T be turned into a crime.....
You need "Reasonable ARTICULABLE Suspicion **OF A CRIME** ", Valenzuela. Articulate what CRIME you suspect. If you are "suspicious" of a person but not because of a possible CRIME, all you are is **PARANOID.**
I see so many clips of cops doing this and never give results. It is refreshing to see these that actually show the cop being shut down for this behavior, thank you
The reason you don’t see any legal action against police officers is because the videos are edited for dumb A$$es and not the full or real stop!
That's when you demand an apology for wasting your time
Too many cops forget Reasonable Suspicioun "of a crime"! The quoted bit is VERY IMPORTANT!
We can argue this in the courts…. That is a threat to arrest which is a “ chilling of rights”.
That alone should warrant a lawsuit
@@klisetj What I have found out is the justice system is not even concerned about real crimes committed by themselves.
I had video of criminal activity by an officer. He and a court clerk who warned him got someone to get in thru my iCloud and alter the video by several seconds. Destruction of evidence… his Sargent, internal
Affairs, fbi, sheriffs, Texas rangers, attorney general. Nobody sees a problem OR if I could tell them who, how, when, where, and the address of the person who did it then they might do something.
Once you understand gaslighting, it's easy to know when it's happening. Dont let yourself get manipulated by anyone ever.
That’s why you don’t wait to argue it out in court. You are forced to take a day off from work, pay for court costs only to have it dismissed. That’s a perfect example of why you ask for a supervisor. When they knowingly violate your rights, they do so because they were trained to always assert some perceived perception of authority in all situations. What they don’t teach them is the basic tenants of the constitution!
This, too, will change!
@@jeffkidder5282 will it though. I’ve been watching these videos for years and I see no signs of change.
You forgot one thing, people lose thier jobs, housing, and relationships while sitting in jail waiting to fight it. It can take years sometimes and people can’t always bond out if they even get a bond.
@@LoliLife69. I totally agree 💯% but I’m just so of feeling like I’m screaming into an empty void and it’s too exhausting. I hope you haven’t had a bad experience and if you have, I’m sorry for that too. They don’t care about the repercussions of their actions bcuz they have qualified immunity so the city has to pay, not the cops who keep f’ing with our lives. Eventually a department will fire them but far too many back the thin blue line. I’m done commenting about the same crap day after day. I’m content to clear my algorithm with puppies and babies giggling.
did you go through law enforcement training? i'd like to see videos show specifics of what they are trained in because they all have the same behavior.
That cop actually took it better than most. Seems like he didn’t know and once he knew he was actually more cool. Have a nice day and yes sir. He’s not as bad as some I’ve seen!
Then he shouldn't be a cop to begin with 😊
@@vanessawagner6209 he basically figured out he was wrong and let it go. Even kind of convincing when he said have a good day. I’m sure he’s learned what he was doing from someone else on the force. He didn’t seem angry, or disrespectful, just uninformed. Didn’t seem like he minded being taught. I’d say those are the ones we need.
An apology to the citizen would have actually been the RIGHT thing to do. Humble yourself, servant. Many times, that's the problem in the first place.
@@KMcGrierI wholeheartedly agree with this but I also question whether or not they are supposed to say that kind of thing. A lot of employers will teach you not to apologize if you get into an accident or something because they want their investigation to determine culpability and not something you said on a whim or when emotions are heightened from stress.
Make sure you follow up relentlessly with suing him and filing a complaint as you were detained.
File a complaint against him the more complaints against him the worse it will be someday in and he may get fired.
Keep on this stupid trend of thought... When he gets fired who patrols your streets? U guys forget that u sleep at night because someone has given up his own sleep for your safety.
Problem is!...cop probably didn't learn, or don't care!!...& Will just keep doing this!!
Cops need to be held accountable!!
I like that a cop told him what was right and he ended with a "yes, sir"
Supreme Court said” If it can be seen, it can be recorded”!!!!!!! FACT.
Which is perfectly fine, but when you can give articulable reasons as to why the behavior is suspicious, police have every right per case law to stop and identify that person. It is perfectly logical for that officer to think that he could be planning an attack on the Jail to break someone out or plant explosives or what have you. Just because you can do it, doesn’t mean you can’t be stopped and identified. Read case law, bro.
I was parked on the side of the road eating and someone said I was doing suspicious activity they had me at gun point and all that
That was bullchit
This guy got it easy
But if they can’t?
But maybe if he talks really fast, nobody will question his "authority."
fire him for operating illegally for not knowing the law.
Remove qualified immunity.
Join AAQI Americans Against Qualified Immunity
@@stevenstair1068 As long as the government is calling the shots they aren't going to remove the protections they placed there in the first place.
Use 2ndA.
Yes amen.
@@stevenstair1068thanks for info!
Kudos to the cop who showed up and quickly handle the situation, and kudos to the other cop for admitting he was wrong and leaving without a big fuss
He needs to be fired,he doesn't know his job.
He's hired because he's an order follower.
Never in doubt but rarely right This is the new motto of America’s police departments. It should be written on the sides of all patrol cars
So true. Theyre so confident in being wrong.
Absolutely well said timduke. Gold☆
The cop needs retraining. It's not "a reasonable and articulable suspicion," it's "a reasonable and articulable suspicion OF A CRIME." He already admitted that it's not illegal to film. Should have been end of story.
“Reasonable Articulable Suspicion” is not actual “suspicion” of a crime. It’s a standard of evidentiary proof of a crime required to detain a citizen. Just as “probable cause” is the evidentiary standard needed to make an arrest, reasonable suspicion is the standard directly below, and required for the less serious “action” of legal detainment.
Quite honestly, it’s poorly worded legal jargon, for at its core, it’s a legal standard that requires a loftier level of proof/substantiation/evidence then mere “suspicion”, or even reasonable suspicion. That this clown of a cop tried the “my suspicion is high enough to meet the standards of articulable suspicion” displayed a complete and utter lack of understanding/knowledge of the policy. Essentially, this standard exists as a means of safeguarding citizens from legal detainment resulting from a cops or citizens mere suspicions with no supporting and/or corroborating proof.
@@cb5117 You're just using shorthand there. The Law Dictionary defines RAS like this: Reasonable suspicion is a standard established by the Supreme Court in a 1968 case in which it ruled that police officer should be allowed to stop and briefly detain a person if, based upon the officer’s training and experience, there is reason to believe that the individual is engaging in criminal activity.
So, you see. LEOs have to have some reason to believe criminal activity is occurring. You can't stop someone for filming from a public sidewalk. You can't just stop someone because a caller freaked out about guy with a holstered pistol in an open carry state. Now, if, 5 minutes earlier, there were reports of gun fire and there's a body on the road, a crime has been committed and you're within your rights to see if that person with the open carry pistol who is just 4 blocks away from the scene of the crime is involved. That would be a reasonable suspicion you could detain for. You might even be able to confiscate the firearm for testing due to the timing and proximity.
Thank you
. . . and to top everything off, even after that public spanking, he couldn't swallow his pride sufficiently to say something like, "Oh, my mistake. I'm sorry about that sir."
*_Everyone_* makes mistakes at work from time to time - it doesn't have to be a big deal.
You accept responsibility for your mistake, you apologise, you do what you can to make things right, then everyone moves on. Easy.
There's a difference between "reasonable articulable suspicion THAT a crime has occurred" and simply being suspicious. This cop doesn't know the difference.
One complaint form, please. Unlawful detainment.
The satisfaction to be within your right.....priceless
Reasonable ARTICULABLE suspicion.
OF A CRIME. Suspicion doesn't mean shit without the crime part.
@@theotherdave514 That's the whole idea of suspicion. That's the entire idea of R.A.S. There is no legislation that DOESNT have it tied to criminal activity. Cops are attempting to pass policy off as law. Not a law ive ever read about R.A.S. was separate from criminal activity, what else would a cop suspect? It HAS to be a crime.
Another bully in uniform who needs to learn the laws he’s supposed to uphold.
He knew the law he just thought he could bully the guy
He knows the law. He's simply being a bully, threatening, and egotistically prideful.
I bet you a million dollars he already knew that.
Honestly, the cop was wrong, but he wasn't acting like a bully.He was trying to do his job and he was just incorrect about the law. As soon as the other officer told him he was within his rights, he said okay.And walked away ending the detainment. The guy also tried to provoke a reaction by dismissing the officer and the officer said "Yes, sir" quite respectfully, i might add.
@@kylehufferd7660Nah you're wrong, he is a bully and a tyrant thug in uniform, and it's all thanks to that mentality right there of yours that we live in a totalitarian police state, go lick corrupt cop boots but don't try defending the indefensible tyrannical ever again.
That's exactly why we keep saying the system is broken, him knowing that he will be safe in court.
He gon wait for him around the corner and pull him over😂😂😂
LMAO!!! Petty as hell!!
And he will pay the price if that’s what he chooses to do
They know him, they know better!
Bodycam off 💀 bout to catch him lacking
Cop is borderline psychopathic.
No he isn't. I would guess this is the channel fir anti social losers.
Nah he’s not. He’s just misinformed. He had the integrity to admit to being wrong and left with no further issues. He’s not a psychopath just Ill informed
He's a cop and don't know the laws period
This officer needs some psych evaluation and retraining😅 on the Constitution he swore to uphold 📸🦾📸🦾📸 power is in the camera
Remember kids always film the police
@@michaelwirth6843one of the popular people that does this kinda content got a 14yr old pregnant.
Def gotta be a special type of weird to spend your free time trying to bait cops.
The other cop is like can’t I leave you alone for five minutes.
At this point there's just an industry of guys going around recording public property and waiting for a cop to try to stop them. What's baffling is how it works. Everywhere.
Valenzuela should be fired and never be allowed to work in the public sector again
It's concerning that he is already.
If it isn't a crime how can u claim its suspicious activity
Should've said: "Did you learn something tonight?'
The cop walked away with his tail between his legs. He lost and he knew it. No need to say anything else.
This cop is clueless.
Reasonable articulable Suspicion… of a crime.
Reasonable suspicion OF A SPECIFIC CRIME
At least the supervisor was good enough to tell him he was right and to have a good evening.
"You're dismissed."
Pure gold!
No apology from piggy
They never do. That would be an admission that they're ignorant of the law.
I hope you are joking 😂
@@Priority57 of course I'm joking.
“You’re dismissed Valenzuela”
“Yes sir!”
I thought that's what I heard.
At least he understood his ego was checked and bowed out
@@nigma195😅😅
“Don’t b bullied”
“Don’t b bullied”
They can never admit they were wrong......speaks volumes about who they really are !!!!!!
I think cops are taught early on in their training that they must always be the ones in control of any situation, cuz if they're not, then they've already lost. So this is his ill-fated attempt at being in control.
I think they're also taught that everyone is the enemy.
No crime. No ID!
Much respect to the cop that showed up and told the other cop that the guy had every right to do what he was doing. There are good cops out there, they aren’t all bad.
as he sat there and watched the entire thing lol.
@@nicklazzaro5055 Whilst it is a short, and there are edit cuts. Based on what is shown in this short, it does not look like the other cop was there the whole time, but rather the video has it look like he arrived later.
The other cop doesn't deserve respect.. He was simply doing his job, rather than being a tyrant.. why does anybody deserve anything more than their paypacket for upholding an oath that theyce sworn to
@@stevematthews4092to set an example. They have to start somewhere. It’s like saying, the janitor cleaned the bathroom really well. Well yeah it’s their job, but also need to set an example of how it should be done. The cop can easily have agreed with the other cop and got away with it due to qualified immunity. But he didn’t
@@alvinnarciso6130 You have a point. And that the saddest thing of all.
Venezuela should be investigated by the FBI for the amount of times that he's violated the first and Fourth amendment Constitution rights of American citizens. It found guilty of any charges he should receive the maximum penalty allowed by law. Just for the fact that he is a sworn law enforcement officer, so he should know the laws and the United States Constitution that he swore to uphold. So therefore he is willfully violating constitutional rights and should be criminally investigated and prosecuted for those actions.
That's how things would be if you had a REAL government. The US doesn't have one. They are a fraudulent sovereign, using Christianity to claim Indian land title and sovereignty.
Except can’t trust the FBI either 😢
@@stevekrauser9454 my family is 1/3 police officers. It really sickens me that I cannot trust the federal police forces to actually follow the laws. Yet I am forced to pay for their salaries benefits equipment and everything else 🤬
The FBI is more corrupt than this clown.
They love that "we can argue it in the courts" line when they know what they are doing is unlawful.
Free tuition 😂😂😂 Dude got schooled!
"Reasonable suspicion of suspicion" 😂😂😂
They all know the laws they just hope that you don’t
What gets me about all this is they never say sorry, they never ask their authority why it's not ok, just 0 correction, responsibility or respect.
Thats why i have no respect for cops.... They are wannabe soldiers who were too scared to sign up so they act like soldiers towards civilians in their own country.... embarrassing wouldnt even begin to describe 95% of cops.
They are trained to never admit fault and never apologize.
That PUBIC BEARD ? DID HE BUY THAT ? 😆 🤣 😂 shite he funny too 😂😅
End 20 Year Pensions
Likewise, end 'qualified immunity' BS for *all* bureaucrats, judges, LEOs, and politicians.
This OAF-icer will make the evening news and embarrass this PD !
Cops should be forced to apologise for when they are educated for being stupid of things they should already know, and then be put on report for unlawful actions
Fk their probable insincere apologies. I don't want to hear it. They only apologize when they Eff up. And they only do it because they hope you don't push the issue.
That would be a forced apology and wouldn't be real. They wouldn't be "sorry" even if they apologize.
You ask too much. It'll never happen.
Totality of circumstances??? That’s the part he remembers when he wasn’t sleeping during training. 😂😂😂
What a unprofessional ignorant officer who should be removed from service
I LOVE THE WALK OF SHAME😂😂😂😂
Standing in the rain filming a closed jail isn't a hero.
@@BilTucker , did you just deep throat a pair of boots?
Fire this cop.
Fire? He is doing what every other cop is, following orders and just doing his job.
@@chrispreston256 So you know what orders he was given? I dont know if it is wrong training they are getting or they have NEVER read the law that they are stating in this video but I still go by Fire this cop. This is the same with anyone that enforces the law. If he wants to hold a weapon and push people around join the military but remember that is where the other guy has a weapon also and shots back.
@franklinrichards8851 statement meant to be condescending. Police are ignorant of law and they enforce what they are told to. Nowhere can you find the authority delegated to government that allows them to rule over man. The authority given to government comes from the consent of the governed meaning man or mankind.
When the cop said "yes sir" at the end made me laugh so hard. I think that's gonna put a smile on my face all day.