Yes! I like that approach, it makes the music feel less static. I mean, in music theory, a quarter note consists of two 8th notes, but Scriabin abstracted from that, since there's no reason why a quarter not can't equal 3 "12th" notes (triplets).
One could say that the op. 14 no.2 Impromptu interpretation here has a number of mistakes in it, e.g. at around 4:29; and 4:47 BUT the vast musicianship that Valentina Lisitsa possesses carefully veils these “mistakes” as something one could think of as a free interpretation of the piece by the pianist. In fact the past few centuries were marked by performers being much more creative with their interpretations, where such modifications were welcomed. So bravo to Valentina!
This performance sounds very nice to me. Even if a performer does questionable things in other Scriabin recordings, I don't think we should let that take away from our enjoyment of this very pretty recording.
She takes too many liberties with the rhythm. She pulls it around actually dotting some of the rhythms rendering them unintelligible re counting. Just terrible.
Scriabin did the same when he played. Just listen to how he performs some of his own works (there are some Welte Mignon rolls or even recordings around, as far as I know). He pulls the rhythm around even more than Lisitsa. Try counting along with those!
Art is about expressing. It's about soul. You don't count when you are crying or in love or feel blessed. But you count when you dancing. And almost all Scriabin's works are more poetic than dance like. All the soul of the music will gone if you try to play it like Bach
I was looking at the Sistine Chapel ceiling and noticed the characters aren't perfectly evenly spaced and some are even doing different poses. Michelangelo was an idiot! Just terrible.
![SCRIABIN - Mazurkas / Complete [Boris Bekhterev] 2010](/img/1.gif)
아름다운 2번 곡은 서글픈 추억을 들려주는 것 같습니다. 아련하면서도 반짝이는 눈물같은 곡이네요.
Triplet number isn’t even necessary anymore! : D
Yes! I like that approach, it makes the music feel less static. I mean, in music theory, a quarter note consists of two 8th notes, but Scriabin abstracted from that, since there's no reason why a quarter not can't equal 3 "12th" notes (triplets).
Wonderful playing , great affinity to Scriabin.... Bravissima !
The second one is the first Scriabin piece I ever heard. It's remarkable in every way imaginable, as most of his pieces are.
toujours tres bien VALENTINA
One could say that the op. 14 no.2 Impromptu interpretation here has a number of mistakes in it, e.g. at around 4:29; and 4:47 BUT the vast musicianship that Valentina Lisitsa possesses carefully veils these “mistakes” as something one could think of as a free interpretation of the piece by the pianist. In fact the past few centuries were marked by performers being much more creative with their interpretations, where such modifications were welcomed. So bravo to Valentina!
Yes, but at 4:47 b natural instead of b flat is inaudible...
Valentina is ok I guess
How do you know those were mistakes?
4:36 heavenly
Exquisite passage, indeed!👌
Every scriabin piece is an impromptu anyway tbh
Not necessarily. Many of his pieces are tightly and thoughtfully constructed.
Real
op14 no2 very nice
How can I marry Scriabin
At best you can marry Elisha Abas, who is the great-great-grandson of Scriabin.
The first piece is in B Major, not minor
Thanks. It is fixed!
In Scriabin what's the difference betwen an improptu and a poem?
好きな演奏だけど No.2その方は音が外れてるのが残念
The piano wasn't out of tune, dumbass
The volume comes out super low on my computer, unfortunately! Is it the same for anyone else?
Hmm, it seems to work fine for me. Are the video volume, system volume, and speaker settings turned sufficiently high?
MoldySoup Hmm, not sure what was with my computer that day; I am listening to it now and the volume is fine!
Scriabin is good (he is Jesus(?🤪))
B***h Lisitsa bad 🤣
How
@@toothlesstoe Andsnes better 🥰
@@BetonBrutContemporary That doesn't answer the question
This performance sounds very nice to me. Even if a performer does questionable things in other Scriabin recordings, I don't think we should let that take away from our enjoyment of this very pretty recording.
She takes too many liberties with the rhythm. She pulls it around actually dotting some of the rhythms rendering them unintelligible re counting. Just terrible.
Scriabin did the same when he played. Just listen to how he performs some of his own works (there are some Welte Mignon rolls or even recordings around, as far as I know). He pulls the rhythm around even more than Lisitsa. Try counting along with those!
Art is about expressing. It's about soul. You don't count when you are crying or in love or feel blessed. But you count when you dancing. And almost all Scriabin's works are more poetic than dance like. All the soul of the music will gone if you try to play it like Bach
What psychopath feels the need to count while listening to music?
I was looking at the Sistine Chapel ceiling and noticed the characters aren't perfectly evenly spaced and some are even doing different poses. Michelangelo was an idiot! Just terrible.