The Soloist, Anatol Ugorsky, is a totally underrated pianist. He's an amazing musician and his recordings of some of Chopin's polonaises are the best I've ever heard. If you're wondering if they're worth to be checked, I would say that they must be!
00:07 I. Allegro - F# minor 07:50 II. Andante - F# Major 16:32 III. Allegro Moderato - F# minor, Ending in Major. Detailed Timestamps Below For Each Movement. (Rehearsal Markings and Noteworthy Moments) 00:07 I. Allegro - F# minor 00:07 Orchestra; Intro 00:24 Piano; Theme 1 00:45 Mark 1; Orchestra takes theme 01:18 Transition to Theme 2 01:37 Mark 2; Theme 2 02:07 Mark 3; Transition Theme 02:37 Mark 4; Development of Theme 1 03:14 Mark 5; Key Change to A minor. Aspects of Theme 2 appear. 03:28 Mark 6; Idyllic orchestra with serene winds, glittery arpeggios in piano 03:55 Mark 7; Return to f# minor. Transition to a development of Theme 1 04:17 Mark 8; Development of Theme 1, Wailing into the abyss. Powerful. 04:36 Piano solo 04:52 Climax 05:13 Mark 9; Theme 2, Transposed down a fifth 06:06 Mark 10; Transition Theme returns, but darker. 06:36 Mark 11; Preparation for Closing 07:10 Mark 12; Closing Reminder of Theme 1 07:50 II. Andante - F# Major 07:50 Theme - Andante; Stated by orchestra. Sentimental. 09:24 Variation I - Andante; Piano enters - A glowing continuous melodic line with a warm accompaniment 10:56 Variation II - Allegro Scherzando; A charismatic, upbeat and less serious variation. Scherzo is fitting. 11:31 Variation III - Adagio; A brooding, slow, and serious lament interspersed with Melancholy, Haunting orchestral interjection. 13:40 Variation IV - Allegretto; Warm and glowing melodic line as with Var. I, but with more ornamentation and counterpoint. 15:14 Tempo I; Essentially Variation I, with a lyrical closing. 16:32 III. Allegro Moderato - F# minor 16:32 First Subject - Theme 1; Dramatic passion and a Soaring arpeggio figure. 16:53 Mark 1; Interlude; Theme 2 appears, is interrupted by theme 1, and then proceeds in full. 17:27 Mark 2; Theme 2 18:02 Mark 3; Second Subject - A Major; Theme 3 18:52 Mark 4; Theme 4 19:19 Mark 5; Theme 1 Returns 19:39 Interlude Returns 19:49 Mark 6; Interlude 20:11 Mark 7; Theme 2 Returns 20:38 Mark 8; A short Development on Theme 1. Switches to A minor briefly, then to D major. (B minor?) 21:09 Mark 9; A Brilliant, Bright passage. A Development on Theme 3. 21:41 Mark 10; A Hair-Raising Orchestral passage Building up Massive Tension - Approaching the Climax. (Return to F# minor) 22:02 Mark 11; Theme 1 - Majestic, Dramatic Climax. The theme is then developed. 22:52 Mark 12; Development - Themes 1 and 2 contrast 23:04 Mark 13; The previous is reiterated more brightly 23:26 Mark 14; F# Major - Development on Theme 3 23:40 Mark 15; Development on Theme 4. Contrasted with hints of Theme 1 25:13 Mark 16; Development on Theme 1 Contrasted with Theme 4, all in Major 25:54 Mark 17; Closing - A minor (C major?), then F# Major - All Themes interact, as well as the Brilliant section in Mark 9 26:47 Piú mosso. - Finishing Thoughts 26:54 Mark 18; Finale - A Brilliant figure Analogous to that in Mark 9, Tremolos, and Brass End in 3 F# Major Chords. This is one of my favorite Concertos, and I learned a good deal from analyzing it. Very passionate and lyrical! Movement 1 Appears to be in some sort of Ternary Form, with some imagination, of ABA' or thereabouts. Movement 2 is a Theme and 4 variations, with the first being basically repeated at the end. Movement 3 is in Sonata Rondo Form, with the development beginning with a reiteration of the first theme. The Rondo aspect can also be seen in what I called the "Interlude", where Theme 2 appears to be interrupted in the middle by theme 1. The exposition consists of 2 subjects; The first set in F# minor, the second in A major, the relative Major. This 'exposition' is then repeated, but with a few noticeable differences. The development, after restating the main theme, goes on to compare and contrast different harmonic and motific elements of all 4 subjects, adding on gradually, to come to a brilliant closing section in F# Major, the parallel key. Movement 3 has bits and pieces that are tangentially similar to aspects of the themes of the first movement, and the second subject reminds me of movement 2. Overall, the work is very unified, but my favorite is movement 3, and 21:41 and the climax are one of my favorite moments in all of music. I spent 3 hours writing this...
"It might interest you to know that I met the brother of Scriabin; he is in a Russian Cavalry Brigade out here [in France during WWI]. Though he is a charming man, he is not interested in music at all, and, like many people, considers that his brother was mentally 'not all there.'" -Capt. Clive Carey, writing to the Royal College of Music Magazine If this is what being "mentally not all there" is, the world could do with a lot more of it
Scriabin suffered from depression in his childhood after injuring his right hand. In his later years, various claims or statements he made caused many to view him as insane or a megalomaniac, particularly in his claim to be God and the savior of humanity.
Scriabin was a music classmate of Rachmaninoff but each has distinct style. Sadly, Scriabin died of septicemia at an early age, and Rachmaninoff toured Russia playing Scriabin's music to raise money for his widow and children.
The first variation of the Andante has to be one of the most expressive and moving pieces of piano music that I've ever heard. This entire concerto, particularly the final movement, is really astonishing.
What a masterpiece! 18:53 shows a delightful contrapoint between piano, orchestra and clarinet. Balanced energy, delicacy and ingenuit wrote by a true genius. Finally, a gran finale!
The Golovanov quality is higher and superb. Clear and cristal phrasings combine with a flexible and fluid dinamic were executed by him. He was a virtuosis icon. Old russian school created the best masters of piano. I imagine how even more amazing this remastered recording would be.
I have to add that at over 80 years of age, I first heard Scriabin's music on an Ampico piano at about 20 years of age. He "spoke" to me then and he still does! Thanks to RUclips , I can hear more and more of this forgotten composer.
Thank you! I bathe in his music! Rachmaninoff was an admirer of this genius. I hope that in the future he will be accorded his place in musical history.
@@jonathanDstrand oh i think it's just because everyone likes to quite justifiably jerk off the other two and while they're amazing the first is sort of underappreciated
No offence. But how do you know about this piece and still call it a song. I think it’s great that you like this piece. But naming bothers me. But honestly no offence
@@ineednamesugestions2259 I'm not English user. Sorry for my poor English. Maybe the meaning of the word 'song' would be somewhat different in my language... In my language, It is often that all the music called as a song
The restatement of the secondary theme at 21:13 always gives me shivers, and the entry of the piano soon thereafter has made me cry a couple of times, such an extatic climax suddenly cut by that F# minor 6/4 chord. Thank you very much for sharing this gem.
There are moments that make me cry! Scriabin could be a "heart" composer when he wasn't battling the demons that pushed his music "over the edge." Don't get me wrong, I love everything Scriabin wrote (especially his Piano Sonatas), but he was battling demons most of his life.
This is difficult to admit, but among my 600 plus CDs I have a some of Scriabin's orchestral works that I like and play often. But I had never heard of this piano concerto, let alone heard it. It is beautiful. I will listen to it often from now on.
@@dracowolfe305 Other than this I’m aware of a Reverie Op.24 and the 5 symphonies, most of his music is for solo piano. The rest of the orchestral pieces seem to be sketches put together by later composers/conductors. If you’re new to Scriabin in general his music evolves drastically from typical romantic era to his own mystical language in the later works starting from Op.58 onwards which includes the 5th symphony. Symphonies 1 and 2 are from his early period, 3 and 4 are in the middle as he’s transitioning to his later style. The piano sonatas follow a similar trajectory if you haven’t heard them. 1-3 are early, 4 and 5 are in the middle, 6-10 are late. Vers la flamme is also worth checking out if you take a liking to his later music.
@@ilikeplayingffftonecluster851 do u know of any pieces by scriabin that r more cataclysmic than vers la flamme? its a great piece... but doesn't satisfy me :/
One thing I like about the Third Movement, is that only the Piano holds the last note. (I think that more Concertos should end with, only the Solo Instrument).
@@sea7kenp i kind of agree but with this specific concerto i would actually prefer if both held a very long glorious chord, it kind of reflects the spirit of the movement because its filled with glory, especially near the end, and it just suddenly ends in a more langurous-sounding chord
I hope Yunchan Lim one day will add this to his repertoire as he professes a liking of seldom played works and variations are his favourite to play.😊His Scriabin performances were all on point.
The best piano concerto I've ever heard although there are many great composers and great piano concertos, ecstasy and pleausre that scriabin's concerto express is unrivaled to any other piece
Such a nice piece! Seems I listened to it a few months ago because I remember the triplet chords in the finale. Very engaging music on all levels of musical satisfaction. Would love to hear it in the concert hall; except Scriabin’s music seems to be neglected nowadays. Though I have never been a fan there are a number of his larger works that are worthy of attention and praise. I’ll probably return. PWG
Very beautiful! There were moments when I was expecting the run to have bigger moments and end with a chord sound like Chopin does, but it was still very beautiful.
What makes me want to play amazing at my piano degree exmas this week is so that I can continue for my diploma and play this amazing concerto.. I ve heard countless piano concertos but nothing so powerful and romantic at the same time as this one, I am in love with all the movents, there is not a single note of this masterpiece I would change..
I’ve never been a fan of Scriabin’s music. But this concerto is engaging, romantic, beautiful and in places rhapsodic. Everything I look for in a piano concerto. A piano concerto must bring the composers original intellect to the fore else listeners become disinterested and dismiss it as vacuous. This piece avoids all semblances of contrivance and is quite inspirational. I love the triplets in the finale which gives it gorgeous momentum up to the very last notes. This masterpiece shows Scriabin’s wonderful potential for music worthy of the classical repertory. I certainly will listen again in the near future and expect my admiration to grow with familiarity. PWG
I love Brahms; especially his first piano concerto which, interestingly, terrified me for years though I knew it was a masterpiece. A live performance featuring Andre Watts greatly helped me to understand this piece and gave me clarification. You never know how things will turn out! PWG
Wow. I'm mostly familiar w/ Scriabin from his piano preludes, surprised to hear such consonant harmonic language from him. Gorgeous, but not the same vibe as the preludes. Got me to learn about his different periods.
Hearing a piano concerto.is like opera. No costumes, no story no libretto, so capturre we, the audience with a melody that we can relate to touch our hearts amidst exciting virtuosity displays. Such a concerto will win friends for many years
An expression of nature, you can almost touch the music. Perhaps the most underrated romantic concerto (that I known of), but I'm ok with it not being played to death, it's that special.
This is indeed a Great Concerto, but no little. This ethereal, phenomenal, sublime, beautiful piece of music is half an hour long but is the summary of an eternity.
It really is a wonderful concerto. Yes there are Chopinesque aspects, but for me it is really pure Scriabin already. Very romantic, passionate, Russian and fragrant. What really surprises me about this concerto is how rarely it is performed. It's certainly very difficult but certainly not harder than Rach 3 or Prok 2. Really no idea why...
Scriabin was actually a master of orchestration, unlike Chopin who knew next to nothing about writing for other instruments. Scriabin's early piano writing specifically was indeed slightly Chopinesque, nonetheless.
I wonder that too. But there are so many masterpieces that are barely played... I suppose this is due to the ease of selling all the seats at a hall. With Rach 3, a concert hall is easily filled. I find that Scriabin is not as often performed as I would like.
I have a theory that it's a deliberate plan by the people who organise concerts-it's such a gem that they decided at some point that it would be performed only rarely,so that people don't become tired of it-and as a result,there'll always be at least one 1st class gem that people will continue to marvel at as the centuries roll by.(But don't quote me on that).😜
I'm currently preparing this concerto for my graduation recital, and I must say that it's surprisingly pianistic. Regarding this concerto being overshadowed, I have a theory. I believe that many people regard and quote Scriabin more for his later, more modern works, than his early Romantic ones. It is true that Scriabin was highly influenced by Chopin in composing this, but this concerto is no mere imitation. It is a reflection of Scriabin in his own right.
13:40 Every time I listen to it, I think A lyrical and beautiful melody that misses someone so much, but the sadness in it The clarinet melody that I exchange with the piano makes me cry
did you know they knew each other, in fact they studied together (there's a picture of them with his teacher when they were just children, very cute!) rach and scriabin's styles are beautiful indeed!
@@-cloudsaboveuscrying-6805 Indeed, I believe Rachmaninoff was deeply affected by Scriabin's death as well (he died quite young) and toured with Scriabin's music to show his appreciation. One thing that he never did get though was Scriabin's synesthesia (seeing musical notes as colors in a spectrum).
@@nicb4589 It would still sound beautiful, just not as beautiful with orchestra. Because this is not meant to be a solo piece so obviously the orchestra plays a very critical role in making this so beautiful
Like the first light of dawn, this music opens the eyes to new promises and all the wonders of nature. Evocative of belief in the afterlife and powers beyond observation, these pieces pull the strings of the heart, draw nostalgia and awaken loves, skinned lives and sleepy watchmen 👀
I understand there is an abundance of pompous snobs, but modern music is just jelly, no layers, no complexity at all, and most of all, no intrinsic beauty in form or structure.
The fact Scriabin wrote this in a few days is mind boggling, how I wish I could have an ounce of his genius. How tragic he could never explore the true depths of his mind, it's a tragedy for all of us
There's also an old recording by Heinrich Neuhaus of this piece. The sound is somewhat dim and the faster scales and arpeggios sound like little more than blurs, but the playing is very poetic and (somewhat) understated, as in this performance. Interesting that Neuhaus played and recorded this piece, but not the younger pianists of the "Russian piano school": Richter, Gilels, Yudina, Berman, etc. At some point I had that Neuhaus recording on autoplay, it spoke a lot to my inward circumstances at the time. Therefore listening to this recording gives me a strong sense of deja vu.
![Scriabin - Piano Concerto in F sharp minor, op. 20 (Vladimir Ashkenazy/Maazel) [Complete]](/img/1.gif)
One of the best piano concertos ever composed. The fact that is not so famous makes it a special piece, like a hidden garden full of beauty
Criminally underrated piano concerto.
The Soloist, Anatol Ugorsky, is a totally underrated pianist. He's an amazing musician and his recordings of some of Chopin's polonaises are the best I've ever heard. If you're wondering if they're worth to be checked, I would say that they must be!
Totally agree
If Rachmaninov says so...!
@@zebulonspruijt1645LMAO
There is no way one cannot immediately fall in love with an aesthetics as beautiful as this.
00:07 I. Allegro - F# minor
07:50 II. Andante - F# Major
16:32 III. Allegro Moderato - F# minor, Ending in Major.
Detailed Timestamps Below For Each Movement. (Rehearsal Markings and Noteworthy Moments)
00:07 I. Allegro - F# minor
00:07 Orchestra; Intro
00:24 Piano; Theme 1
00:45 Mark 1; Orchestra takes theme
01:18 Transition to Theme 2
01:37 Mark 2; Theme 2
02:07 Mark 3; Transition Theme
02:37 Mark 4; Development of Theme 1
03:14 Mark 5; Key Change to A minor. Aspects of Theme 2 appear.
03:28 Mark 6; Idyllic orchestra with serene winds, glittery arpeggios in piano
03:55 Mark 7; Return to f# minor. Transition to a development of Theme 1
04:17 Mark 8; Development of Theme 1, Wailing into the abyss. Powerful. 04:36 Piano solo
04:52 Climax
05:13 Mark 9; Theme 2, Transposed down a fifth
06:06 Mark 10; Transition Theme returns, but darker.
06:36 Mark 11; Preparation for Closing
07:10 Mark 12; Closing Reminder of Theme 1
07:50 II. Andante - F# Major
07:50 Theme - Andante; Stated by orchestra. Sentimental.
09:24 Variation I - Andante; Piano enters - A glowing continuous melodic line with a warm accompaniment
10:56 Variation II - Allegro Scherzando; A charismatic, upbeat and less serious variation. Scherzo is fitting.
11:31 Variation III - Adagio; A brooding, slow, and serious lament interspersed with Melancholy, Haunting orchestral interjection.
13:40 Variation IV - Allegretto; Warm and glowing melodic line as with Var. I, but with more ornamentation and counterpoint.
15:14 Tempo I; Essentially Variation I, with a lyrical closing.
16:32 III. Allegro Moderato - F# minor
16:32 First Subject - Theme 1; Dramatic passion and a Soaring arpeggio figure.
16:53 Mark 1; Interlude; Theme 2 appears, is interrupted by theme 1, and then proceeds in full.
17:27 Mark 2; Theme 2
18:02 Mark 3; Second Subject - A Major; Theme 3
18:52 Mark 4; Theme 4
19:19 Mark 5; Theme 1 Returns
19:39 Interlude Returns
19:49 Mark 6; Interlude
20:11 Mark 7; Theme 2 Returns
20:38 Mark 8; A short Development on Theme 1. Switches to A minor briefly, then to D major. (B minor?)
21:09 Mark 9; A Brilliant, Bright passage. A Development on Theme 3.
21:41 Mark 10; A Hair-Raising Orchestral passage Building up Massive Tension - Approaching the Climax. (Return to F# minor)
22:02 Mark 11; Theme 1 - Majestic, Dramatic Climax. The theme is then developed.
22:52 Mark 12; Development - Themes 1 and 2 contrast
23:04 Mark 13; The previous is reiterated more brightly
23:26 Mark 14; F# Major - Development on Theme 3
23:40 Mark 15; Development on Theme 4. Contrasted with hints of Theme 1
25:13 Mark 16; Development on Theme 1 Contrasted with Theme 4, all in Major
25:54 Mark 17; Closing - A minor (C major?), then F# Major - All Themes interact, as well as the Brilliant section in Mark 9
26:47 Piú mosso. - Finishing Thoughts
26:54 Mark 18; Finale - A Brilliant figure Analogous to that in Mark 9, Tremolos, and Brass End in 3 F# Major Chords.
This is one of my favorite Concertos, and I learned a good deal from analyzing it. Very passionate and lyrical!
Movement 1 Appears to be in some sort of Ternary Form, with some imagination, of ABA' or thereabouts.
Movement 2 is a Theme and 4 variations, with the first being basically repeated at the end.
Movement 3 is in Sonata Rondo Form, with the development beginning with a reiteration of the first theme. The Rondo aspect can also be seen in what I called the "Interlude", where Theme 2 appears to be interrupted in the middle by theme 1. The exposition consists of 2 subjects; The first set in F# minor, the second in A major, the relative Major. This 'exposition' is then repeated, but with a few noticeable differences. The development, after restating the main theme, goes on to compare and contrast different harmonic and motific elements of all 4 subjects, adding on gradually, to come to a brilliant closing section in F# Major, the parallel key.
Movement 3 has bits and pieces that are tangentially similar to aspects of the themes of the first movement, and the second subject reminds me of movement 2. Overall, the work is very unified, but my favorite is movement 3, and 21:41 and the climax are one of my favorite moments in all of music.
I spent 3 hours writing this...
I am glad you did . Good job
Your are verry good musically educated,you have all my respect,thank you.
3 hours well spent
Firoza Le Grand thank you
Thanks for your excellent analysis.... It helped me a lot in understanding such a beautiful music
This actually almost brought me to tears. I can't remember the last time a classical piece did that for me
One of the most beautiful things I've ever heard. So many of Scriabin's pieces elicit tears from me - almost no matter who's playing it.
Oh how you would tear up from my performance... its painful to listen to, like an axe in your pancreas.
nice pfp
Felix Blumenfeld does that to me
even me?
3:55 - 4:35 is just utterly magical… Takes me somewhere else. The genius of Scriabin having the cello open the section with the three note motif too
Me too nnplayed this n manila n Valencia spain w Oleg caetani
Wish he wrote more concertos...
The second movement brings back bittersweet youthful memories of a time when everything was just simple and happy... ah the nostalgia
7:48
Dude… who cares… go to sleep
@@randompianistis4670 likewise
is u jeffrey ches brother
@@charliezhang6567 LOL YES
like living in a small town in the middle of russia
I'm obsessed with this work.... my dream is to perform it with orchestra some day. It's so undervalued!!!
I encourage you to keep working, this is an amazing, almost perfect concert
its so sad, that its so undervalued... I wish more people understand music..:(
haceme un petardo!
@@ramonfertimon3532 primero conseguíte la hierba
@@danielfeygin1216 jajaja
"It might interest you to know that I met the brother of Scriabin; he is in a Russian Cavalry Brigade out here [in France during WWI]. Though he is a charming man, he is not interested in music at all, and, like many people, considers that his brother was mentally 'not all there.'"
-Capt. Clive Carey, writing to the Royal College of Music Magazine
If this is what being "mentally not all there" is, the world could do with a lot more of it
Genau
eu concordo com o irmão dele kkkkk
Um grosseiro e invejoso falando mal do irmão gênio, que compôs músicas maravilhosas e eternas como esta!
Scriabin suffered from depression in his childhood after injuring his right hand. In his later years, various claims or statements he made caused many to view him as insane or a megalomaniac, particularly in his claim to be God and the savior of humanity.
To be fair he had some issues, he was odd for sure, but that doesn't take anything away from the value of his work
I only listened to this once, and it becomes my favorite piece.
Never sat down and listened to all of this before despite my love for Scriabin. I'm glad I've finally done it :) was completely worth it.
+1 here. To my ears, this concert has a touch of Rachmaninov and Chopin, just like the other early Scriabin's pieces.
NOBODY CARESSSSS
Scriabin was a music classmate of Rachmaninoff but each has distinct style. Sadly, Scriabin died of septicemia at an early age, and Rachmaninoff toured Russia playing Scriabin's music to raise money for his widow and children.
@@jessicakespohl8340 Rachmaninoff is a beautiful human being
@@jbrandao7675 nobody cares if nobody cares
3rd movement is absolutely amazing
The first variation of the Andante has to be one of the most expressive and moving pieces of piano music that I've ever heard. This entire concerto, particularly the final movement, is really astonishing.
My favorite by Scriabin. What a genius.
What a masterpiece! 18:53 shows a delightful contrapoint between piano, orchestra and clarinet. Balanced energy, delicacy and ingenuit wrote by a true genius. Finally, a gran finale!
This version is bad because of Boulez. Listen to Golovanov
The Golovanov quality is higher and superb. Clear and cristal phrasings combine with a flexible and fluid dinamic were executed by him. He was a virtuosis icon. Old russian school created the best masters of piano. I imagine how even more amazing this remastered recording would be.
I have to add that at over 80 years of age, I first heard Scriabin's music on an Ampico piano at about 20 years of age. He "spoke" to me then and he still does! Thanks to RUclips , I can hear more and more of this forgotten composer.
Thank you! I bathe in his music! Rachmaninoff was an admirer of this genius. I hope that in the future he will be accorded his place in musical history.
hes not 'forgotten'...naybe in comparison to more famous ones but hes not forgotten
man, i just love this concerto. beautiful.
unpopular opinion: the first movement is really cool too
lmaooooooo
how is this an unpopular opinion lmao
@@jonathanDstrand oh i think it's just because everyone likes to quite justifiably jerk off the other two and while they're amazing the first is sort of underappreciated
@@Joe-oh5ch yeah that's exactly what i meant. they're all fantastic, but the first is especially underappreciated in comparison to the other two, imo.
The first movement is my favourite
I've never thought this song was bad while listening to it hundreds of times.
This song itself is the biggest reason why I like music.
No offence. But how do you know about this piece and still call it a song. I think it’s great that you like this piece. But naming bothers me. But honestly no offence
@@ineednamesugestions2259 cause he used translation
@@ineednamesugestions2259 I'm not English user. Sorry for my poor English.
Maybe the meaning of the word 'song' would be somewhat different in my language...
In my language, It is often that all the music called as a song
@@ineednamesugestions2259 just be happy people r listening to Scriabin
13:40 love this part
It sounds like a spanish dance
The second movement is wonderful, so nostalgic and moving, I almost cried...
don't hold back bro
I always cry
I cried indeed
Beautiful concerto.
The restatement of the secondary theme at 21:13 always gives me shivers, and the entry of the piano soon thereafter has made me cry a couple of times, such an extatic climax suddenly cut by that F# minor 6/4 chord. Thank you very much for sharing this gem.
There are moments that make me cry! Scriabin could be a "heart" composer when he wasn't battling the demons that pushed his music "over the edge."
Don't get me wrong, I love everything Scriabin wrote (especially his Piano Sonatas), but he was battling demons most of his life.
Me too! Such a powerful moment!,
Honestly, I got goosebumps when I listened to that climax. There are many more powerful moments in this great piano concerto.
@@leoinsfI agree with you, he could’ve been a rachmaninoff/chopin type but his music has a kind of twisted nature to it
@@AndrewKierszenbaum Check out his life and you will understand his "twisted nature!"
This is so beautiful - the Andante - when the piano (and obo) arrives - I cry every time - - - -💝
My fav piece of classical music....just love all this harmonies😍
This is difficult to admit, but among my 600 plus CDs I have a some of Scriabin's orchestral works that I like and play often. But I had never heard of this piano concerto, let alone heard it. It is beautiful. I will listen to it often from now on.
Are there any Scriabin orchestral works you would recommend? Other than this concerto I haven’t heard much from him so I don’t know where to start
@@dracowolfe305 Other than this I’m aware of a Reverie Op.24 and the 5 symphonies, most of his music is for solo piano. The rest of the orchestral pieces seem to be sketches put together by later composers/conductors. If you’re new to Scriabin in general his music evolves drastically from typical romantic era to his own mystical language in the later works starting from Op.58 onwards which includes the 5th symphony. Symphonies 1 and 2 are from his early period, 3 and 4 are in the middle as he’s transitioning to his later style. The piano sonatas follow a similar trajectory if you haven’t heard them. 1-3 are early, 4 and 5 are in the middle, 6-10 are late. Vers la flamme is also worth checking out if you take a liking to his later music.
@@ilikeplayingffftonecluster851 thank you very much! :))
@@dracowolfe305 the ending of symphony 1
@@ilikeplayingffftonecluster851 do u know of any pieces by scriabin that r more cataclysmic than vers la flamme? its a great piece... but doesn't satisfy me :/
Love the second movement.
+Medtnaculus Yes it's great! One of my favourite movements ever.
Yes! The second movement is one of the most beautiful pieces of music ever written.
One thing I like about the Third Movement, is that only the Piano holds the last note. (I think that more Concertos should end with, only the Solo Instrument).
@@sea7kenp i kind of agree but with this specific concerto i would actually prefer if both held a very long glorious chord, it kind of reflects the spirit of the movement because its filled with glory, especially near the end, and it just suddenly ends in a more langurous-sounding chord
This is making me teary. So beautiful! 😭❤️
Scriabin is SO underrated !
Divine Masterpiece for piano. MANY THANKS FOR TO SHARE THIS DEAR FANTASTIC
WONDERFUL! I LOVE Scriabin! Have played the 4th and 5th piano sonatas, both most excellent works!
Based
i love how the second movement is just a theme and variation, like wtf that is amazing
I hope Yunchan Lim one day will add this to his repertoire as he professes a liking of seldom played works and variations are his favourite to play.😊His Scriabin performances were all on point.
The best piano concerto I've ever heard
although there are many great composers and great piano concertos,
ecstasy and pleausre that scriabin's concerto express is unrivaled to any other piece
I've been listening to classical for a long time now and especially concertos and I'd really have to say this is the best piece of music out there imo
Along with the Pfitzner Violin Concerto, this has got to be one of the most underrated classical pieces ever.
04:50 to 05:15 simply magical what happens right there, the transition from the orchestra to just the piano is unexplainable.
Agree
Lyrical with sparkling and very tender moments yet strong-spirited. Wonderful concerto.
Such a nice piece! Seems I listened to it a few months ago because I remember the triplet chords in the finale. Very engaging music on all levels of musical satisfaction. Would love to hear it in the concert hall; except Scriabin’s music seems to be neglected nowadays. Though I have never been a fan there are a number of his larger works that are worthy of attention and praise. I’ll probably return. PWG
I'm so glad this is back. I often listened to this only for the superb brass section at the very ending. Best recording of this work hands down.
Very beautiful! There were moments when I was expecting the run to have bigger moments and end with a chord sound like Chopin does, but it was still very beautiful.
18:04 wtf Scriabin?! One of the best moments in music ever!
True, I prefer the F# major version tho
Sounds very similar to the theme in Rach 3
Beautiful! and Boulez strangely emotional here...
This concerto is the perfect balance between drama, beauty and complexity. Scriabin will always be a great landmark for world music.
Sono un coreografo e la mia anima sta volando in questo ascolto. Grazie al genio ma sopratutto all’artista Scriabin.
The long final plagal cadence is so simple. And so perfect.
A very underrated comment! only one has musical mind understands.
That first movement so goood
What makes me want to play amazing at my piano degree exmas this week is so that I can continue for my diploma and play this amazing concerto.. I ve heard countless piano concertos but nothing so powerful and romantic at the same time as this one, I am in love with all the movents, there is not a single note of this masterpiece I would change..
Favourite moments:
• 4:52 • The climax of the 1st mvt
• 13:40 • Var IV of the 2nd mvt
• 16:32 • The whole 3rd mvt
• 18:04 • Beautiful melody
i just want 18:04 to 18:50 on repeat for rest of my life
Me too. I put this on my phone as an alarm, so I can wake up with Scriabin
that's dangerous o.o I would instant fall asleep again
I just want 13:40 - 16:30 on repeat for the rest of my life :)
@@StefanGraz how did you make it your alarm?? I want it too 😃
Beth M cut the file with Audacity to 30 seconds and convert it into your phone‘s ringtone format eg m4r on iPhone.
Beautifully composed and interpreted concerto!
Beautiful! Thanks for sharing!
No words can describe the ending of this concerto.
I’ve never been a fan of Scriabin’s music. But this concerto is engaging, romantic, beautiful and in places rhapsodic. Everything I look for in a piano concerto. A piano concerto must bring the composers original intellect to the fore else listeners become disinterested and dismiss it as vacuous. This piece avoids all semblances of contrivance and is quite inspirational. I love the triplets in the finale which gives it gorgeous momentum up to the very last notes. This masterpiece shows Scriabin’s wonderful potential for music worthy of the classical repertory. I certainly will listen again in the near future and expect my admiration to grow with familiarity. PWG
I bet u like Brahms
I love Brahms; especially his first piano concerto which, interestingly, terrified me for years though I knew it was a masterpiece. A live performance featuring Andre Watts greatly helped me to understand this piece and gave me clarification. You never know how things will turn out! PWG
Thanks. The apogee of high/late Romanticism.
Rather late romanitcism
Wow. I'm mostly familiar w/ Scriabin from his piano preludes, surprised to hear such consonant harmonic language from him. Gorgeous, but not the same vibe as the preludes. Got me to learn about his different periods.
Hearing a piano concerto.is like opera. No costumes, no story no libretto, so capturre we, the audience with a melody that we can relate to touch our hearts amidst exciting virtuosity displays. Such a concerto will win friends for many years
Beyond this world. Definitely one of my favorite piano concertos.
4th variation at 13:38 is outstanding
Yes amazing counterpoint (the piano and the clarinet)
An expression of nature, you can almost touch the music. Perhaps the most underrated romantic concerto (that I known of), but I'm ok with it not being played to death, it's that special.
I think moskowskis concerto is the most underrated personally
wonderful concerto .. there are so many concertos underrated and forgotten .. thanks for uploading olla-vogala !!
By far the best rendition of this beautiful piece... Thank you for sharing.
This just happened to be the next video being played on youtube and wow I'm glad for that coincidence. This is pretty amazing.
Thank you so much for this upload and ESPECIALLY for providing the date of composition. I really appreciate it when you uploaders do this!
Wow this concerto is so beautiful. Almost like Rachmaninoff, but with his own distinctive style.
Thank you ever so much for posting this!
What a pleasant find. Great little concerto.
This is indeed a Great Concerto, but no little. This ethereal, phenomenal, sublime, beautiful piece of music is half an hour long but is the summary of an eternity.
It really is a wonderful concerto. Yes there are Chopinesque aspects, but for me it is really pure Scriabin already. Very romantic, passionate, Russian and fragrant.
What really surprises me about this concerto is how rarely it is performed. It's certainly very difficult but certainly not harder than Rach 3 or Prok 2. Really no idea why...
Scriabin was actually a master of orchestration, unlike Chopin who knew next to nothing about writing for other instruments. Scriabin's early piano writing specifically was indeed slightly Chopinesque, nonetheless.
I wonder that too. But there are so many masterpieces that are barely played... I suppose this is due to the ease of selling all the seats at a hall. With Rach 3, a concert hall is easily filled. I find that Scriabin is not as often performed as I would like.
I have a theory that it's a deliberate plan by the people who organise concerts-it's such a gem that they decided at some point that it would be performed only rarely,so that people don't become tired of it-and as a result,there'll always be at least one 1st class gem that people will continue to marvel at as the centuries roll by.(But don't quote me on that).😜
I'm currently preparing this concerto for my graduation recital, and I must say that it's surprisingly pianistic. Regarding this concerto being overshadowed, I have a theory. I believe that many people regard and quote Scriabin more for his later, more modern works, than his early Romantic ones.
It is true that Scriabin was highly influenced by Chopin in composing this, but this concerto is no mere imitation. It is a reflection of Scriabin in his own right.
Because no one cares about Scriabin .. deal with it.
one of the best music and music events!
00:00 - I. Allegro
07:48 - II. Andante
16:30 - III. Allegro moderato
Ce concerto est véritablement d'une grande beauté !
RIP Ugorski, one of the greatest obscure pianists ever.
Thank you for the information, as well as the timings.... I like Scriabin a great deal, and in particular...his 24 Preludes Op.11....THANK YOU!!!...
This is great music!
The best piano concerto I've have ever heard.
Move over, Rach 2 or 3
In my opinion, rach 2 is the only one can bring more touching emotions then this one.
You should listen to more. I can name at least 10 better ones.
Rach 2 and 3 are over-sentimental disgusting works who make me want to puke. It was made for philistines.
What about Moszkowski E minor or Ravel?
Magnifique concerto
Scriabine was a genius 🙏
Thank you so much ! So wonderful. 🌷🌷🌷♥🎹🎵🎶 (The Netherlands)
That Middle movement is beautiful
Grazie per aver dato la possibilità di seguire l’ascolto con la partitura.
13:40
Every time I listen to it, I think
A lyrical and beautiful melody that misses someone so much, but the sadness in it
The clarinet melody that I exchange with the piano makes me cry
Reminds me so much of Rachmaninoff second movement of the second piano concerto.... or, in general, it has a Rachmaninoff hint... LOVELY!
did you know they knew each other, in fact they studied together (there's a picture of them with his teacher when they were just children, very cute!) rach and scriabin's styles are beautiful indeed!
@@-cloudsaboveuscrying-6805 Indeed, I believe Rachmaninoff was deeply affected by Scriabin's death as well (he died quite young) and toured with Scriabin's music to show his appreciation. One thing that he never did get though was Scriabin's synesthesia (seeing musical notes as colors in a spectrum).
Wow, what a gem!
This concert makes me cry all the reprimed emotions I have inside myself
Wish I had the piano skills to play this piece just once in my life.....
Me too... it's very difficult music, we should start with some easier pieces!
It sucks without orchestra, really. Even in the two piano transcription, it doesn’t work magically like with the orchestra
@@nicb4589 It would still sound beautiful, just not as beautiful with orchestra. Because this is not meant to be a solo piece so obviously the orchestra plays a very critical role in making this so beautiful
"That thing" in the 3rd movement really exhausts the pianists.
Am I the only one who imagines these concertos as scores to movies?
No. You're not the only one, Soham
Actually, a lot of movies scores are inspired by classics, a lot of Scriabin, Rachmaninov, Prokofiev (star wars, Johin willams i.e.)
@@cesarostoich7759 Exactly!! Its the other way around lol
philistine
what does that mean?
Like the first light of dawn, this music opens the eyes to new promises and all the wonders of nature. Evocative of belief in the afterlife and powers beyond observation, these pieces pull the strings of the heart, draw nostalgia and awaken loves, skinned lives and sleepy watchmen 👀
A great piano concerto!! Bravo!!
26:56, I love the brass here, I don’t know why.
It's like Starwars.
dang, we got nobody making music today who can think of something like 18:04
There's plenty who could, they just don't because Scriabin already did :P
Don't you know that they have used up all the notes? It's a great excuse.
@@rwsmith7638 Clearly that's not what I said. But why copy someone else's style?
Just a joke. Sorry if it offended you.
I understand there is an abundance of pompous snobs, but modern music is just jelly, no layers, no complexity at all, and most of all, no intrinsic beauty in form or structure.
The fact Scriabin wrote this in a few days is mind boggling, how I wish I could have an ounce of his genius. How tragic he could never explore the true depths of his mind, it's a tragedy for all of us
movement 2 is one of the best things I've ever heard, especially variation 2. And my god, the ending!
Best interpretation in my opinion
One of my favourite piano concertos ever. The first movement is a grandiose complain.
Excellent recording. I really like Ugorski's playing. It's not too sentimental and he keeps close to the score.
Beautiful, especially so in the 2nd movement dialogues between soloist and orchestra. A clean sounding though difficult work-- not "over-written".
Just lovely
I did not realize before how beautiful F sharp major is.
*minor
There's also an old recording by Heinrich Neuhaus of this piece. The sound is somewhat dim and the faster scales and arpeggios sound like little more than blurs, but the playing is very poetic and (somewhat) understated, as in this performance. Interesting that Neuhaus played and recorded this piece, but not the younger pianists of the "Russian piano school": Richter, Gilels, Yudina, Berman, etc. At some point I had that Neuhaus recording on autoplay, it spoke a lot to my inward circumstances at the time. Therefore listening to this recording gives me a strong sense of deja vu.
Which recording do you prefer?