13 WORST American Cars From The 1950s, Nobody Wants Back!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- Welcome to 13 WORST American Cars From The 1950s, Nobody Wants Back!
The 1950s was a decade known for bold, brutalist architecture and some of the flashiest cars in history. With a booming post-war economy, people were eager to fill their new homes with shiny new possessions.
Automakers competed fiercely to create the most glamorous and eye-catching cars possible. While some cars from this era were stunningly beautiful, others were simply considered hideous.
Today, we're discussing 13 WORST American Cars from The 1950s, Nobody Wants Back!
--------------
Copyright Disclaimer
We do not fully own the material compiled in this video. It belongs to individuals or organizations that deserve respect.
We use under: Copyright disclaimer section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. "fair use" is allowed for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching. scholarships and research.
--------------
#musclecars
#fastestcars
#luxurycars
#vintagevehicles
Totally disagree about the Studebaker Hawk series. They were beautifully designed and aesthetically satisfying.
I agree.
@@joethompson8948 Me too.
My parents had a 56 golden hawk til 64, mom got a 61 lark followed by a 63 wagonair. dad got a 65 daytona. By 67 everybody got bitten by the vw bug/bus/ghia/ et al...
A milestone society classic..this video is awful.
Absolutely.
I was a mechanic for a racer who had a '53 Hudson Twin H Hornet oval track racer. He NEVER lost a race from, '54 to '63. Car is still running today.
In their day they were the monsters of the stock racing world.
Somebody did a poor job of editing the video. You show a concept car that was never built and call it a Hudson Jet.
Editor needs to pay attention to what their doing!!!!!!
@@edjohnston2363 ITS AI... some guy in India...
Looks to me you could knock down a telephone pole with that thing and not even dent your bumper.
You noticed it too, I see.
Unfortunate AI circling the subject with fractured facts and poor photographic accompaniment. The errors are too numerous to list. Do yourself a favor and scroll on.
I found a Nash Healey for sale at an even $100,000. Somebody obviously wants it.
I'll take one any day! 🚗...
This whole list is one man's opinion and it is wacko. One example ...the 1954 Buick was so popular that it outsold Plymouth, and became the third best selling car in the country, a position that Plymouth had held for years
@@billygeeto Criticize the mid 50s Buicks? Broderick Crawford is spinning in his grave!
Remember the old Superman TV series. Clark Kent was seen driving a Nash-Healy a number of times. In fact Nash must have supplied all the cars for that show.
@@jsat5609 yeah, Crawford was so fat he would shoot the escaping perp in the back....as a warning shot
Title should read “Top 13 American cars from the 50’s that REAL people, not AI, would have back in a heart beat rather than most of todays plastic crap”.
he's a knothead, a friend had a Studebaker Hawk, it ran like a scalded ape, Golden Hawk, love that car. As a kid the Edsel was my fav to spot on long trips. Agree about the Nash tho.
@@charliethompson7556 but with more safety and better handling.
You are a lot safer in a crash in a"plastic crap" than you are in steel.
the funny thing is the video is ALL AI... lol
@@user-hi9xe9vc7x That's true, but most people don't know that. Nowadays you are more likely to survive a crash because of the crumple zone and better designed safety belts. And air bags and collapsible steering wheels.
I'd love to have these cars back!
These cars may have been shunned by the public when they came out, but today they are in such demand that you can't buy any of them for a reasonable price.
Supply and demand it's called. Guess you go to the Harris/Walz school of business.
@@brucetowell3432 - How did you guess. Supply is limited and the demand is great. Any 5th grader can tell you that.
@@georl1 Well if a 5th grader knows why these cars are so expensive, why didn't you?
@@brucetowell3432 - I never said that I didn't know why these cars are so expensive. If you had paid attention to your reading comprehension class in school, you would have understood what I wrote in my comment. But that's the way it si when you don't pay attention.
@brucetowell3432 - That was a typo. It should be is and not si.
That BMW is not an American car!
Ford Anglia was produced in the UK.
Nor is the Nash Healey
@@nevco8774 And most of the Anglia clips are older than the car being described.
THIS IS AI... it doesn't know, the author doesn't either
The BMW is the ONE car that I would totally agree on.
While in High school I owned a 1954 Buick Roadmaster 2dr hardtop and loved it - I would love to have it back - really comfortable and loved the 322 nail head V8 engine.
Ohhhhh...🤤🤤
Race you for pinks Myron, I like them too.
Much better than I.....I owned a '46 Harley' when in high school and never owned my first car until after I was 20 (in 1960) and married....a '51 Kaiser I bought for $25....with the same Continental flathead in-line 6 cyl engine also often employed in many fork lifts....must have had at least 80 hp!
Who wrote this crap?!
@user-cx7kg6ok9b AI voice too?
They really dragged it out.
a woke person DEI hire
@@WAL_DC-6B YES THIS IS ALL AI
@user-cx7kg6ok9bThe Ford Anglia narrative was for the 105e, the one mostly visualised is the 100e, very different cars.
Your intro on the 50's, showed a 1974 Olds, and what followed was rubbish. A lot of us would love to have many of these 50's cars back, as they have beautiful styling lines and aren't stamped out to look all alike like many cars today. Those cars all had personality and flair.
It's a 1973 Cutlass
Sharing design & parts across the product line, division, or sister companies leads to sameness. Unfortunately, the lesson of shareholder stock value has taken deep root.
@@NorthShore10688GUTLAS...
Sloppy journalism
Uh, but it was from the '50s-remember like all 'those other 1973 Cutlasses?@@NorthShore10688
What a Jerk! These were all great cars! Wonder what he is smoking?
AI wrote the script...
Lucky Strikes.
How can any one hate a hawk
The Hawk was based on the 1953 Studebaker Starlite coupe, and many consider it to be the finest American automotive design of the entire decade.
@@WAL_DC-6B I owned a '53 back in 1964 and I also got to drive a Darren for one day back then. Both cars were fun to drive.
it came of a list and he AI generated the script and then fed it into a AI voice... none of this is real
Got a kick out of his comment that the fins where too small to be functional.
Ask a squirrel.
The BMW Isetta was a LICENSED design from an Italian design firm. The vehicle was built in SEVEN countries, over 161k units were produced, & its small engine had a fuel economy of 3L / 100 km. It was strictly form following function because of gasoline expense, taxes & scarcity in post WWII Germany 🇩🇪 It was much better than a scooter !!
But not much better, it was enclosed at least.
@@garycamara9955 // Your choice. I know what mine would be. It does rain & snow in Germany. Oh, and where does that sack of groceries go with someone riding on the back of the scooter ?? True, we are talking VERY BASIC transportation. According to the Missing Persons band, "Only a nobody walks in LA."
The Hudson Jet shown is wrong. You show one of those “dream cars” that doesn’t have anything to do with the real car. A very simple research on the internet would have given you a lot of information for the Hudson Jet.
It's rhe 1951 LeSabre Concept Car
The only people that complained about Nashes were the ones that never owned one. 😂
I love my Nash Ambassador, styled by PininFarina.
The metropolitan was an auto waiting for the oil crash in 1974
First family car I remember was a 50 AMBASSADOR. Family kept it until 59 with only normal maintenance. Without Power steering, Mom's Arthritis made parking difficult, otherwise it would have continued for who knows how long.
We had a school teacher that few people liked who drove a little Nash Metropolitan. One day she was working late at school and a few of the football players turned her car sideways so she was sandwiched between two of the school's utility trucks. The janitors had already left and the door she exited locked behind her. So she had to go to a neighboring house and call the principal to contact one of the janitors to move a truck. She was not a happy camper the next morning
. I was wondering what subject she taught. ?
Most of those cars on your list are priceless and unaffordable. They also are not ugly and very reliable in their day. Those Studebaker Hawks were gorgeous and also fast with their O. H. V-8 cly. engines. The NASH Ramblers were easy on gas and had a lot of followers
like my friend and also my older brother who drove them everywhere, with me in it also. All those 1950 cars were likeable .
You have confused the 100E and the 105E, in fact your commentary makes no sense at all!
Apparently the most popular subcompact was not popular? This video make no sense at all.
Exactly- the commentary is clearly about the later 105E with its reverse sloping rear window. That was an odd duck. Most of your visuals are of the earlier and more conventional looking 100E . My family had one and it was good basic transport, although my father was once very rudely asked to remove his "tin perambulator" from the parking space that a rich bastard wanted!
2 cars in and it's clearly obvious this wasn't written or edited by a car person.
All those cars had their own beauty and I enjoy seeing them I can tell you one thing is cars nowadays would you call recycle beer cans and milk jugs are pure garbage there's no class hell you can't even tell what country they're from
Your perspective of worst car just reflects 21st century styling mods on what was trendy in 1950 onward to 1960 or so. Some of the cars I owned in the past were a 1950 Studebaker Champion, a 1955 Buick Century, 1 1956 Pontiac etc. I would love today If I had any of these cars. So don't label worst based on 2024 views of cars today. They all got one from point a to point b.
Sadly you haven't synchronised video with the narrative and are identifying the wrong cars , perhaps you should try harder. Waste of time video.
The Hudson Jet you showed is a Studebaker Manta Ray.
The Studebaker Manta Ray was a one-off custom car built by Glen Hire and Vernon Antoine of Whittier, California in 1952. Assembled with fiberglass molds using 1950s aircraft design as inspiration, it looks unlike anything else on the road, sporting a center turbine-like grille and three tail fins. Sadly, it never went into production.
I'm not sure what was shown as the Hudson Jet, but it wasn't correct. Check out Wikipedia for the right image.
@lrlattimer51 - You're absolutely right. The Hudson Jet looked more like a miniature Ford than it did a Hudson.
The "Hudson Jet" pictures are of the custom Manta Ray project, built on an early 1950s Studebaker chassis and Cadillac powerplant. ruclips.net/user/shortsBpX3QXmz30c
@@c.g.joseph2388 - Then they're not a "Hudson Jet".
bringatrailer.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1954_hudson_jet_16353586582fda1f69HOODSUN24.jpg?fit=1854%2C1236
"The 1950's-
(proceeds to show a 1962 Studebaker)
Regarding the Rambler at 2:10, if the only negative thing the critics could say is "unconventional styling", then it sounds like a pretty successful car, even by modern standards! 😂 I've been driving Nashes for 50 years and find them extremely reliable.
Came here for studabaker manta ray and you even screwed that up!!!!!
The Studebakers, Nash-Healey, Nash Rambler, Hudson Jet, Kaiser Dragon and Kaiser Darrin are ALL Cars I find Brilliant. The Jet failed because they listened to the Hudson concessioner in Chicago, instead of maintaining a "family" look that Frank Spring (the designer) had intended. The Darrin failed because of Kaiser's poor business decisions, and a sluggish 90-HP F-head 6 (the supercharger from the 226cid 6, would have been very beneficial!). Kaiser overall went haywire because of Joseph Frazer's leaving in disgust of Henry J. Kaiser's "Kaisers don't 'retrench'" mess. The Rambler Succeeded TWICE, because they started with the Landau Convertible- to get it into the hands of Lincoln and Cadillac Owners- as a "second car" for the Lady of the Home, then brought-back the Rambler as the "Rambler American" to great acclaim! Studebakers succeeded, but not enough to combat the mess that happened with James Nance and the Packard merger mess (plus fudging their books before the merger, and Eisenhower's Defense Secretary being a General Motors man!). The Nash-Healey was a "halo-car" which it achieved, despite the costs and trip from Kenosha to England, Italy, and return! Donald Healey was too-focused on the Austin-Healey, which caused him to give-up on the Nash-Healey. What killed a lot of the Independent auto brands and cars, was the Eisenhower Recession. That's what killed Packard, Edsel, and eventually DeSoto (Studebaker's a more complex matter).Further, you don't even show the Hudson Jet you dips; you show a Customized Studebaker in its place!
The Hudson Jet (sometimes referred to as Hudson's Edsel) also had too high or a roof line (which the then CEO of Hudson insisted on so a man could wear his fedora hat while driving) giving it an awkward look, styled similar to a period Ford, smaller than that Ford and worst of all more expensive than that Ford.
@@WAL_DC-6B all because of the Chicago concessioner! He sold the largest single percentage of Hudsons across the U.S.A.. The Chicago concessioner said that the Jet (originally supposed to be called the "Bee"), said it should look more like contemporary Ford.
@@nikolausbautista8925 I agree that Jim Moran ("The Courtesy Man" of Chicago's Courtesy Motors) had a hand in the Jet bearing a resemblance to a period Ford. Courtesy Motors was responsible for about 5% of Hudsons total output at the time (about 3000 Hudsons per year). It's just that Hudson CEO A.E. Barit wanted the car higher than the original drawings and plans had suggested. Consequently, the car looked like "a little box on wheels" to quote Frank Spring who was chiefly responsible for the original, lower body design of the Jet.
My father bought a 54 Pontiac 2 dr hdtp, it was a tangerine orange with 3 tone matching leather interior. He inly had it for 2 weeks. That straight 8 was really gutless. He bought a 56 Desoto with a hemi. Beautiful and fast. It was red and black.
My "old man" purchased new a '54 Pontiac sedan. He had to get the Hydra-Matic automatic transmission replaced on a trip to Florida in 1959.
The 1954 Studebaker Starlight coupe is considered one of the most beautiful cars ever designed. This video is not very good.
Probably the best designed American car for the whole decade.
Worst!? That's not been validated here at all except in your opinion.
Its AI, not his opinion... he took a list off a website. fed it into Chat GPT and then in a voice creator... stole video clips and you click :)
I'll tell what no one wants back is this click bait AI rubbish. Narrative dosn't match images - Ford Prefect shown is not a Ford Anglia. The T-Bird styling was on the Ford Consul Corsairs & their British. Could go on, but I have a life
I love the Hawk and the Darrin, beautiful little sporty cars, would love to have one of each.
Not agreed, they are nice cars.
today the Edsel is worth big bucks so its kinda ironic
A 1958 Ford Edsel Pacer was stolen from me back in the 70's. I miss it dearly even today. It was not an ugly car. The sales is what made it not profitable. The consumers were interested in small compact cars.
No, the Kaiser Darrin was on the market before the Corvette.
Negative.
The Kaiser Darrin was introduced in 1954. The Corvette in 1953. Only 435 Kaiser Darrins were built. The Corvette was almost dropped by GM as "sporting motorists found it hard to reconcile themselves to its automatic transmission, even though its modified Six put out 150 horsepower. A V8 option made available by 1955 helped save the car, and the Corvette went on to become one of GM's success stories." This information is sourced from the book, "Cars of the 50s" by the editors of Consumer Guide.
I am so tired of these endless RUclips videos of worst cars that are fact free.
In fact these cars are collectible, hence desirable. These are AI aided creepy videos to catch attention and say nothing.
Unfortunately the people who put them together are fairly clueless about their subject and try to compensate by slapping us in the face with a click-bait title to get our attention.
I want my 53 chevy back was my first car
Two or four door?
The Edsel garnered many snide remarks during its brief history. The one i remember is "A Mercury sucking a lemon."
1959 Edsel was one of the prettiest cars of the '50's.
I remember my Dads 1954 Buick Coup.... one solid built car
Our dad had this car. This was his last Buick before he began buying Cadillacs.
I remember these cars from the 1950s through to the 1960s. I liked most of these cars. I think they were works of art in their time. During the 60s I drove some of the 1950s cars. They were not fast like today's cars, but they were a nice comfortable ride.
Don't care what you say, our older cars were H of a lot better then what we are offered today.
Anthing built in the 70s. When the car companies knowingly sold junk and laughed about it
When I was 5, I fell in love with the '53/4 Pontiac Star Chief 2-dr hardtop: Ivory top, Pueblo tan body; amber Pontiac's head on the hood; metal sun shield; bench seats, and that wonderful 'car' scent. Good thing it isn't listed here ..
That Studebaker starlight is an awesome looking car. It could be hopped up from looking under the hood. Put a small block in it and have a blast with it. The 54 Buick was fine by me also. The waterfall grill was a Buick trademark like the portholes.
Pon toon not pon tawn
I remember most of these cars. In the early 60s there were plenty of them still on the road. However the mussel cars that came out in 62 put many of them in the garage or junkyard for good because they were not cool enough to drive! By1963 the sting ray was tearing up the road. The mustangs, Camaros, firebirds, GTO judge and the AMC javelins took over the roads. And of course there was the Volkswagen Beetle and bus! Wild times in the 60s the race bug was happening all over the country. And by 1972 it was all over for the mussel cars. Rebuilds were the thing that kept the 50s alive. Everywhere people were rebuilding 56, 57 Chevy. The 53 to 59 corvette came back. And many of the station wagons were back to the repair shops being upgraded. By 1975 the gas shortage hit hard on the old cars and most were parked in the garage again or left to rusting from break downs. And by 1975 even the car styles had had been replaced with some god awful and ugly cars. Wish you could have been there to see them all, the 50s & 60s were something else ❤❤
I was responsible for the Buick to be painted in Tahitian Blue,(non original color). I did one in that color scheme, and another followed suit also a yacht.
The Nash Healy was a design predecessor of the Austin Healy Mark I "Sprite." This "Frogeye" design with inboard headlights was not readily accepted by the American public.
The BMW Iseta was a LICENSED design from an Italian design firm. It was strictly form following function because of gasoline expense, taxes & scarcity in post WWII Germany 🇩🇪 It was much better than a scooter !!
I couldn't get through more than a few minutes. The stupid "scratched film" video effects, and the obnoxious camcorder effects drove me away.
ITS AI... he steal video... types in "give me a 3 page critical essay on the 1958 Oldsmobile" PUTS in a AI voice reader and voila... a video you watch... :)
This is what happens when you use AI and don’t know what you’re talking about. This channel is rediculous 😂😂😂
Each summer day I walk from my place to the subway there's a shiny red Austin-Healey convertible parked under the trees. A most heartwarming sight. We have some nice classics in the neighborhood - a couple DSs, a pontoon Merc, a litter of early VWs (including the Karmann) - but this one is probably the cutest of all. Alas, the summer is over, and we won't see it until next year...
Our paperboy would pull up front-on to the curb in his Iseta, fling open the front and toss the paper onto our front embankment.
If not for the front door access, he might have been able to toss the newspaper up onto the roof.. 😂
@@dcasper8514 Except our house sat about 15 ft. higher than the street, and was fronted by a steep embankment.
I want that 58 Oldsmobile!!😍😍
The problem with some of the Edsels was the engine was to long for the intake manifold. A friend of mine's parents had 58 Ranger. His dad changed the intake to a twin 4 barrel carbs. The car got batter gas millage and was a dream to drive. These big cars are road trip cars, big heavy and comfortable, Had a class mate who had a golden hawk. It ate 57 Chevys with fuel injection.
They need to get that Studebaker Manta Ray together with a Ford Edsel, they look anatomically correct for each other.
At two points during this video about 1950s cars they showed a 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 2 door coupe.
That "Nobody wants back" is YOUR opinion. Several of these cars are still highly desirable.
Studebaker goldhawk looks pretty good to me. My dad add a sunbeam rapier which was a UK copy on a smaller scale and it was the best car he ever had,
I find that the Studebaker Hawk was a very attractive car, very much ahead of its time. And the 58 Oldsmobile while overloaded with chrome looks like a tank.
Those old cars would run better than most of the computer junk they have now!😂
By the time my dad traded in the 1950 Ford sedan in for a 1956 Plymouth Plaza I think he had to replace the water pump at least 4 or 5 times. So, sometimes mechanical unreliability was as much a drawback as bad style. Granted, pulling the mountain roads of northern New Mexico and southern Colorado could take its toll.
A Citroen DS` fiberglass nose? What a drivel, this whole clip is so badly put together.
You missed the 1958 Buick which shared the body of the 58 Olds with a different splatter of chrome tinsel. The Studebaker Lark was based on the 1956-1959 Studebaker with the body overhang shortened. The 1955 Studebaker shared it's body with the streamlined 1953 and 1954 models. If you watch the reruns of "The Adventures of Superman" Lois Lane drove a Rambler convertible. Clark Kent often drove a Nash Healey.
Sorry but the Studebaker Hank is a cool design to me . I just saw a Silver Hawk the other day . It was a project car and I wish I had it ! Loved the body design .
The Edsel reminds me of the scream character.
Ok...I see that..
07:00 Comparing the mid-50's Buick with Marvin the Paranoid Android was a neat time travel trick, given that that character never appeared until 1978 in the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. I suspect poor research by the video producer is the real cause. 😅🤣😂
The 58 Edsel was sadly underappreciated.
"CHROOMME....CHROOOMME...CHROOMMMME (bop bop a rebop)"
Very interesting. Edsel Was V-8 only for 1958 Large series Corsair Citation came with a 410 CID MEL V-8 Small series Ranger Pacer and wagons Roundup Villager and Bermuda came with 361 FE V-8. 1959 Edsel's came with A 223 I-6 292 Y block 361 FE V-8. 1960 Edsel came with A 223 I-6 292 Y block and 352 FE V-8.
The commentary is so full of errors that I lost count!
@@danielulz1640 I think @theprinceofsnj (AT-6?) pretty much got it all correct with the engines though my sources have no information on the engines for the short-lived 1960s.
Yes, that does appear to be correct. @@WAL_DC-6B
I saw and photographed a '59 Edsel (windshield chalked as a '58), six cylinder with three-on-the-tree and exterior rotting away, but the owner had reupholstered the front seat in original pattern cloth upholstery and a bolt of fabric to complete the rear seat as well.
@@danielulz1640 More errors than a Braves game.
Worst American cars? I'd take any one of these. There are some truly beautiful cars here! Except maybe the Rambler. But they also failed to point out that one of the drawbacks to owning a Rambler was that the wheels were prone to falling off.
The Rambler just looks so cute
The Studebaker Hawk is a classic.
YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE! OTHER THAN THE BUICK ( I OWNED A '55 MYSELF), THE EDSEL, THE '58 OLDS AND KAISER DRAGON. ALL THE OTHER CARS YOU MENTIONED WERE FINE CARS. ESPECIALLY THE 1954 KAISER DARREN AND THE STUDEBAKER LARK, THEY WERE BEAUTIFUL CARS, THE LARK WAGON WAS GREAT. WHY DON'T YOU MENTION THE '59 CADDY ELDORADO? THAT BEAST WAS UGLY AS SIN. JUST REMEMBER MOST OF THE CARS YOU MENTIONED ARE NOW HIGHLY SOUGHT AFTER AND COLLECTIBLE, IN PARTICULAR THE 1952 NASH HEALY. YOU STRUCK OUT 11 OUT OF 15 TIMES TODAY.
There was a Lark Daytona. A V8 station wagon with a retracting roof in the back. It worked like a roll top desk. You could stand up through the roof.
I applaud all those designers who dared to inovate even though they sometimes went overboard. Today’s cars may be safer, greener and more performant, but most of them are completely uninteresting in terms of style. And don’t get me started on colours.
Didn't agree with all of your picks.
Car models that did not become popular with the American Public, novelty designs for sure.
Studebaker Hawks do NOT belong in this video. They remain stunningly beautiful after all these years. And that grille was an improvement over the 53-54 cars.
These cars had class and personality, not like the soulless junk of today.
I agree, no one wants the Ford Anglia back.
Most of the others we’d all like to see again and have a chance to buy, especially the GMs from 1954-1958 and all their excess, over-the-top design and chrome.
'57 chevie..made headlines.
Cars had character in those days
The Nash Healey predates thec Corvette as America's first sports car.
the worst cars of the 50s are better than the best cars of today.
most people of the world would give their eye teeth to own any of these vehicles
Thats not a Packard Jerk!
At least cars were all steel in the fifties and not plastic!
There was an old lady in Petaluma that had a red Lark convertible with a supercharged Avanti engine in it. I would love to know what happened to it .
G M used too much chrome on most of its 58 models.
Indeed!
So did everybody else.
The true beauty of these, and any 50s cars, is that with a modicum of automotive savvy, you could work on them yourself. Hell, I can't even change the oil on my Benz. Corporations have you by the you-know-whats regarding maintenance.
The Kaiser Darrin was pretty cool.
I agree and when the motor was fuel injected, it was one of the best cars on the road certainly the most engineered
RAMBLER ALWAYS LOOKED LIKE A BATHTUB ! I loved the HAWK and the OLDSMOBILE 98. I was 12 !
They lost that "BATHTUB" look starting in 1956.
I think the Edsel and the Olds/98 are beautiful and if I had the money I'd be getting one!!
My stepfather used to own a Studebaker "56. It was a very reliable vehicle and very comfortable so far I can recall. Every time I spot one of this cars, it brings me sad memories of him. Thank you for the documentary.
Not exactly the fugly fifties for all cars shown but the '58 Oldsmobile 98 was a failed attempt of trying to match Chrysler design of chrome usage.
I recall the ill omen when my father was shopping for a Studebaker Lark. There was a foot pedal pump for the windshield washer. When my father tried it, washer fluid ran down his leg. But he bought the silly thing. It was terrible. It's engine claimed 90 hp but my father said they were very tired horses. OTOH, the Hawk was drop dead gorgeous. Thus the title of this video is a lie - I want the Study (STU-DEE) Hawk back 😂
7:20 That which covers the engine bay is the *BONNET,* not the "hood" and the rear compartment for luggage is called a *BOOT,* not a trunk. The front pane of glass is a *WINDSCREEN,* not a windshield, and the pedal for speed is correctly called the *ACCELERATOR!* *LEARN THE PROPER UNIVERSAL TERMS!*
The only car I didn't want was the Hudson Jet.
When you talk about the Hudson Jet, you're showing the 1951 Buick LeSabre Concept Car