06:30 - There is an interesting line here. At first, I thought this wasn't a blunder, because after Qxg6, we can play Qe1+ and take the Rook. But after Kd7 and Qxc3, Black can play Qb1+, and take our own Rook, leading to a draw!
It's a nice idea, but most 10 minute games for sub-1500 players are decided by making vaguely sensible moves and avoiding gross blunders like leaving pieces hanging (or failing to spot one move blunders by opponents). I think you learn more from playing and analysing some games at a longer time limit, having time to check for all the forks, pins, hanging pieces and mating patterns, really getting a feel of how all the pieces move. Then you can look at those games to find out what the more subtle mistakes were (e.g. being too passive, weakening your pawn structure), think about opponents' threats, and start to form active plans.
I think you're genius and a reason for this is that you are writing everything. But I think you can write even more if you will comment every move on the paper.
Oh no, my blunders are now immortalised for all to see
Don’t worry, everyone starts out that way!
But you've also had a very good player analyse your game. Positives 👍🏻😉
The 600 player played AMAZINGLY. Very impressive for his level!
"THIS IS FINE"
You deserve so much more followers!
4:19. That position, rook, square, knight, in front of a mobile pawn, I call the SOS position.
5:25. What Gotham chess calls 'danger levels', I call 'valance leverage'. White attacks black's rook (5), but white attacks black's queen (9).
06:30 - There is an interesting line here. At first, I thought this wasn't a blunder, because after Qxg6, we can play Qe1+ and take the Rook. But after Kd7 and Qxc3, Black can play Qb1+, and take our own Rook, leading to a draw!
Thanks, I spotted Qe1+ during the video but not the response, very neat!
Really useful stuff -- thanks!
6:37 following that blunder, white also missed Qe1, forking the rook and king. Tragic.
@noxteryn spotted that Black then has Qb1+ regaining the rook.
Oh wow we got the same 3 minute puzzle rush high score
How do i watch your streams?
It's a nice idea, but most 10 minute games for sub-1500 players are decided by making vaguely sensible moves and avoiding gross blunders like leaving pieces hanging (or failing to spot one move blunders by opponents). I think you learn more from playing and analysing some games at a longer time limit, having time to check for all the forks, pins, hanging pieces and mating patterns, really getting a feel of how all the pieces move. Then you can look at those games to find out what the more subtle mistakes were (e.g. being too passive, weakening your pawn structure), think about opponents' threats, and start to form active plans.
On first game, after black takes the bishop on g6 there is a rook king fork
Definitely look for forks and checks more. I need to do that too.
I think you're genius and a reason for this is that you are writing everything. But I think you can write even more if you will comment every move on the paper.
6:32 A far better move would be Queen to e1, checking the king, and forking the rook. You win a rook and you're winning.
Did not see that initially. Good call
But you‘re not? After Queen takes rook, black just takes back or am I missing something
@@fastlegente3430 Oh yes, you're right.
@noxteryn spotted that Black then has Qb1+ regaining the rook.
I don't get why I can see my blunders and bad moves during review, but then constant horrible moves when playing another person..
Are you saying "boo" or "Boo-radders?" I was saying "Boo-radders".
Advanced Frenchilian
❤