The Antichrist | Friedrich Nietzsche
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
- The Antichrist was written in 1888 one year before Friedrich Nietzsche’s descent into madness and immediately after his Twilight of the Idols. Both books should be read under the aspect of the last words of his final original book, his autobiography Ecce Homo: “Dionysus against the Crucified.”
The German title can be translated as either “The Anti-Christ” or “The Anti-Christian”. It was likely meant to mean both. Dionysus has two opponents, one worthy of him, the other unworthy. The name Nietzsche gives to his worthy opponent is Christ - hence Dionysus is the Anti-Christ. As Nietzsche discusses Christ, the tone becomes ever warmer and even ecstatic. It becomes one of the most moving and powerful parts of the book. The unworthy opponent is the Christian, who is undeservedly dignified by being treated to such elaborate condemnation.
⭐ Support this channel: / eternalised
📨 Subscribe with email eternalisedoff...
🎦 Subscribe to the official clips channel: / channel
📺 RUclips Member Perks: / @eternalised
☕ Donate a Coffee: ko-fi.com/eter...
📘 PayPal www.paypal.com...
🛒 Official Merch: eternalised.cr...
📚 My Personal Library: eternalisedoff...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📘 The Book
▶ Twilight of the Idols or How to Philosophise with a Hammer and The Antichrist (1888)
amzn.to/2Ol1Miq
📚 Other Recommended Reading (High Quality and Best Translations)
▶ The Birth of Tragedy (1872)
amzn.to/3uohsRi
▶ Human, All Too Human (1878)
amzn.to/2PDOmP7
▶ The Dawn of Day (1881)
amzn.to/3dyAE87
▶ The Gay Science (1882)
amzn.to/36rijIf
▶ Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883)
amzn.to/2F89V55
▶ Beyond Good and Evil (1886)
amzn.to/2DDjLLL
▶ On the Genealogy of Morals (1887)
amzn.to/3jj0izq
▶ Ecce Homo (1888)
amzn.to/39L9j1E
🎧 Prefer Audiobooks? Get a 30-day Audible Plus FREE trial:
▶ amzn.to/332zPzN
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📺 Odysee ➔ odysee.com/@et...
📺 Rumble ➔ rumble.com/c/E...
🐦 Twitter ➔ / eternalised1
📷 Instagram ➔ / eternalised_official
📘 Facebook ➔ / eternalised
🎧 Podcast ➔ anchor.fm/eter...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📝 Sources
Twilight Of Idols & Antichrist: Or How to Philosophize with a Hammer (2006) - Penguin Classics
en.wikipedia.o...)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🎶 Music used
1. Decline - Kevin MacLeod
2. Aftermath - Kevin MacLeod
3. Virtutes Instrumenti - Kevin MacLeod
Subscribe to Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
/ kmmusic
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Thanks for watching, I appreciate it!
#nietzsche #antichrist
*“In reality there has been only one Christian, and he died on the Cross."*
- Friedrich Nietzsche
Support this channel: www.patreon.com/eternalised
RUclips Member Perks: ruclips.net/channel/UCqos1tl0RntucGGtPXNxkkAjoin
Donate a Coffee: ko-fi.com/eternalised
PayPal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/eternalisedofficial
Official Merch: eternalised.creator-spring.com
Maybe it’s a channel membership?
Urge to play Exiled Kingdoms intensified
How did you do that Nietzsche head thing?😄 BTW amazing video
Jesus was a Muslim
@@kingnative1369 tf, Jesus was a jew
you are one of few channels that explains books in such depth and so clearly, a big thank you for that!
Thank you so much!
One of the most accurate statements ever to be uttered truly is that in reality there has been only one christian and he died on the cross.
Punishment for blasphemy may be the true message of a crucified man for his presumptuous claims that cannot be true thus disrespectful of divine intervention ... the sun rises and the sun set ms is true💕
@@margaretem.385 If it was his sin, presumption and blasphemy, and not ours that Christ died for it would indeed nullify christianity from the beginning. But if it was his revolt against the presumptuous jewish temple authorities and the pharisees who took themselves to be Gods over the gentiles, their actual superiors in the order of nature, then he died for a virtuous cause and could hardly be blamed for it. The same can hardly be said about the average christian however, sheeplike and incapable of sincere action, trascendence or self-sacrifice, or even about the doctrines of christianity in general that seek to affirm eqalitarianism that could in no conceivable world stand true. It truly is the blasphemy of all blasphemies.
@@herptek the claim that the average Christian is “sheeplike and incapable of sincere action, transcendence, or self-sacrifice” might be considered irrelevant considering you could easily replace “Christian” with “human” and the claim would lose nothing but it’s placement of blame. That leads me to believe that the motive of such a statement is in fact the finger-pointing and not an objective analysis of Christianity as a whole, if such an analysis can even be performed. Interested to hear your thoughts.
@@Hereticbliss322 Christianity is a target of my critique only in so far as it affirms and deifies the worst aspects of humanity as virtuous. For example, mercy is a virtue that appeals only to the weak who find themselves in the need of it at the expense of those who don't and yet christianity elevates it as a virtue. In reality the practical need for forgiveness is not alleviated at all by becoming good, by repentance, but by gaining power in a way that takes away the need for mercy, which is after all the ultimate proof of divine favour in this world if anything can be.
Christianity also sees humility as a virtue even though humility can only take root in the hearts of the foolish and naive or else those alltogether without a reason for pride, that is to say the worst people at any metric people measure themselves by, in effect turning their defectiveness into a virtue. There are many obvious reasons to appear humble in the eyes of others but only those who are the best at faking it are the most striking examples of the ethic of humility and gain much respect for it from the innumerable multitudes, the foolish and the naive, who find it familiar. Obviously one does not need to be humble in order to come across as such and to gain great social advantages for it in a christianized culture. It is a pretense meant to elevate ones social status over those honest enough not to brag about it or to evangelize their surroundings about it for the sake of diminishing those around them who actually have a reason for pride. What can be expected as a result is that publicly humble people will prevail over their betters, those with some reason for pride, and the reasons for pride in general, good qualities, will likewise decrease.
Christianity affirms charity as a moral imperative because it is a habit of those whose well being is not threatened by giving from excess and who have nothing to lose from extravagant generosity. That is the most wealthy and the abundant or else the beneficiaries of it, the least abundant, the most irresponsible and abject. Those who are the most disprivileged by the moral imperative to be charitable are those in the middle, who can't afford to give to anyone and everyone but do not stand to benefit from the giving of others since they have enough not to be in need of it. What is clear is that the numbers of those in need will rise at the expense of who don't at the result of widespread belief in the moral imperative to be charitable simply because it makes need a sufficient sanction for entitlement at the pain of moral judgement.
Lastly christianity demands faith as a morality which is of course the last recourse of those who start to believe their victims will realize their scheme is on shaky ground. I believe truth inspires faith and faith can never be demanded as a morality in absence of anything worth having faith in.
Virtues are good and appear as such because they are habits of those who are qualitatively superior to others and they start to stink if they are made to be something common and something to be expected of everyone and of every class, rank and race. Virtuous behaviour stems from power and its appreciation from the appreciation of the noble nature of the powerfull. Christianity has turned it into a means to change power relations so that the weak may be imitated along with everything that contributes to their weakness. Demanding virtue out of people like christianity does will fail because it fails to realize what actually creates virtue and inspires it in people. Serious attempts to moralize virtue into people are more likely to end up in a catastrophe than in any improvement in the masses.
@@herptek that seems like more of a critique of religious morality in general. In fact even secular morality tends to value many of the virtues you’ve listed. I’ve seen a lot of similar ideas in Taoism. I get what you’re saying about virtues being forced on people, and I saw as a youth in church brutal examples of “charity” being forced on those that paid dearly for it, which was then in turn spoken of as if it was worthy of being emulated whereas I found it absolutely detestable. That said, I found most of that virtue corruption at the hands of the people involved rather than the religion itself. When you say that the average Christian is sheeplike, you are of course not wrong. Part of that is that the average human being is sheeplike, as I said already, but also people tend to gravitate towards Christianity later in life as a means of either atonement for living a life of excess or as a last resort to find social acceptance or people that will at least pretend not to judge them. What turned me off was that modern Christians tend to develop an attitude of superiority in their virtue that is generally underserved. Most of the worst people I ever met were Christians!
What I think I’m getting at is that it’s important to separate the shitty Christians from the actual doctrines. When you say that Christ was the only true Christian, I think you’re both right and wrong. Christ was the ideal, the embodiment of the logos. If any person were able to achieve that, they wouldn’t require the grace of god, which is a key part of the Christian rule set. The point is to strive, not to achieve (which is also kind of fucked up if you ask me).
Those are my main complaints with Christianity, but I still have trouble defining the entire religion as a “scheme.” I suspect it’s the corruption of humanity that rubs off onto the religion, not the other way around.
Good video as always. I like the little disclaimer at the start - videos like these (including mine!) are not a substitute for reading. The Antichrist is a very short book. I suggest everyone who watched this video, to pick it up!
Thank you! Yep. I hope people get inspired to read for themselves, I'm a simple communicator of ideas :)
This channel deserves way more viewers. Keep up the great videos.
love it love it love it great summary. Far from my favourite work of Nietzsche but I'd forgotten about the contrast between his disdain for Paul and his love of Jesus
Thanks friend!
Next level content, I'm telling everyone about this channel!
Thank you very much!
This is one of the best books I ever read. Follow Jesus, not Christianity!
Love the book too! :)
Follow me if you want to follow your self!
could you elaborate by what you mean "follow jesus, not christianity "
@GH Nobody said it would be easy. In fact, Christ promised suffering and struggle for those who follow him. If one is doing Christianity correctly, then it should be difficult.
@shamindersaini8635 It means nothing. Christ is Christianity. Christ, as a purely historical figure is so vague, so to try to separate one from the other is ridiculous.
Such an underrated channel. Thank you for these high quality videos!!
Thanks a lot! :)
“The purpose of the appearance in this world of Shakyamuni Buddha, the lord of teaching, lies in his behavior as a human being.”
- Nichiren Daishonin
He who speaks only das truth and nothing false is a Buddha
Great analysis, of Nietzsche's book, I did enjoyed your narration as well, love the art work footage in the background too.
Thanks a lot friend!
Me too.
Pleasant speech is das highest blessing.
So powerful and beautiful. Thank you so much for creating this. Thanks you. I am in your dept
Another great video as always.
Keep it up man! :)
Man don’t ever stop uploading your content u r a gem … really worth it
Great summary. One who wishes to understand this book, however, should first understand Nietzsche's own Dionysian spirituality, which is a work of creative philosophy of the highest order.
Which of his books represent Dionysian spirituality the best in your opinion?
He who remembers himself
finds his tri ky;
My soulmate is my tri ky.
He knows that
it is through de practice of his life,
that he feels divine,
blessed,
and evangelic.
Evangelic practice alone leads to god,
it is god!
God is in us--
das author of our dream.
In aviation, it’s expected that radio calls are clear, concise, and correct. I think you would make a good pilot. Your videos are great man
Great person does great thing
I find that Christianity, and Abrahamic religions in general are meant to delude people into thinking that life is more than what it is. It uses our desire to make suffering meaningful and essentially capitalizes on it.
Buddhism on the other hand doesn't, to the best of my knowledge, delude people with the concept of an afterlife or the idea that our suffering contains some grand or divine meaning.
Suffering is an inevitable part of life but that doesn't make it meaningful, and the idea that there is a meaning behind it is simply a coping mechanism.
Why wouldn’t suffering have meaning?
@@steveoneil5332 There's no good reason to believe that it does. Any belief that it does comes from our desire to make it meaningful.
There may be meaning behind it. What's that quote that's like, a tree, to reach heaven must have it's roots descend down to hell. Basically that it may part of learning more than we care to admit. But we shall see soon enough because we don't live that long. I'm curious what happens.
@@commonclayofthenewwest6045 I actually completely agree with you. Pain, in many cases, is an essential part of growth and self-development, however, the idea that things were meant to happen in the way that they did is what I disagree with.
I believe statistically probable events occur and that's all there is to it. Certain events lead to other events and so on, however, the idea that there was some grand plan behind it is something I'm not convinced of.
What I believe is that you can use what you've gone through to grow. What happens to you will either make or break you based on your own choices and how you decide to interpret your experiences in life.
"if you haven't cried while eating, you don't know what life tastes like."
" Friedrich Nietzsche or others are tremendously important, but they are not one with the whole. On the contrary, they are super-egoists - particularly Nietzsche. I love him, too. He has a tremendous insight into things; great revelations have come through his mind. And he's the one most neglected all over the world - perhaps out of fear, because once you are deep into Nietzsche, you cannot be the same person you have been before. Nietzsche is going to change you .His thoughts are rational; his insights have no parallel in the whole history of philosophy but still, he is not a meditator. It is all mind.
And this is the distinction I would like you to remember: There have been two types of influences in the world, people who have changed millions of lives. One belongs to the mind - all the philosophers, all the thinkers; they have great genius as far as mind is concerned. They have impressed millions of people for thousands of years and they are still fresh. But there is an different line of people like Gautam Buddha, Bodhidharma, Jesus Christ, Lao Tzu - these are not philosophers. What they are saying is not coming from the mind. It is coming from beyond the mind. They have put the mind aside. To understand them, just intellect is not enough. To understand them, you will have to go on the same path as they traveled
.Mind goes nowhere. All philosophers are playing with words. Sometimes there is immense beauty even in words, great poetry, logic, that you cannot deny. Nietzsche, Hegel, Kant, Bertrand Russell, Jean Paul Sartre, Jaspers or Martin Heidegger are pinnacles of intellectuality. You are bound to be impressed - but you are not going to be transformed. And to be impressed is to be enslaved. Unless a transformation happens, your slavery goes on deeper and deeper.
Look at the life of Friedrich Nietzsche, not just his philosophical approaches towards reality. His life is one of utter misery. You would not like to be Friedrich Nietzsche if you knew his life. He lived absolutely alone, without friends, because he was such an egoist that to make friends with him was impossible. He was high above; you are just creeping on the ground. What friendship? - he does not consider you to be even a human being. He considers you as a subhuman species. And his whole philosophy is how to create the real human being which he used to call the 'superman.' But he himself was not even an ordinary man, what to say about a superman? - physically ugly... but that can be pardoned; he could not manage in his whole life to love a woman, because love to him was domination and nothing else. He wanted a servant, not a beloved - a slave to dance according to his tune. Looking at his life, one feels deep compassion. He lived his whole life alone with his sister. The sister sacrificed her own life because somebody was needed to take care of Nietzsche. And finally, he went mad. And remember, nobody goes mad suddenly. Madness is something that grows slowly until it is too much and everybody else becomes aware of it. He was mad from the very beginning, but it was not known; it was within the normal insanity of humanity. But soon, he crossed the line. In the end, even though he was declared mad, he had forgotten all his philosophy, he had not forgotten one thing - even in his madness.
And you will be surprised: what is that one thing? That one thing was that he would always sign his signature as "Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche." That "Anti-Christ" was the only thing that remained even in his madness. Not a single letter has he signed without writing "Anti-Christ" before his name. If he had been born in India, he would have been anti-Gautam Buddha; if he had been born in China, he would have been anti-Chuang Tzu. It doesn't matter, these names are not the point. Why was he anti-Christ? - because Christ is not a philosopher. Christ does not give any reasons for his assertions, he speaks on his own authority. He gives no arguments, there is no need. Because he feels the truth, he expresses it. He does not argue. In fact, only lies need arguments. You can see in any court, so many arguments....Truth is naked. Its very presence is enough to convince you. And if truth can not have self-validity and depends on arguments, it is not truth. Arguments may change. Somebody may be more logical than you are..
..Nietzsche is a great logician, a great philosopher, but he knows nothing of reality. All that he says is mind - guesses, inferences. Assumptions supported by argument may befool people but they cannot befool a man who knows. Nietzsche does not know. But he writes beautifully. He writes very consistently, he reaches to the very heights of argumentation. But these are not things of real, authentic value. The only thing valuable is experience, not argument. And Nietzsche is absolutely without any experience. He has never meditated, he has never been in his own being. He has never contacted the vast, beautiful universe that surrounds us. It is our womb. We are in it, continuously being nourished.
The West is rich as far as useless things are concerned and poor as far real values are concerned. Nietzsche was "Anti-Christ" for the simple reason that millions of people follow Jesus, and Jesus has not given a single argument to prove his philosophy. And to disprove his philosophy, Nietzsche goes on giving, one after another, hundreds of arguments - beautiful arguments, very refined arguments, but arguments are just arguments. You can go on arguing about love your whole life, but that will not give you the experience of love. The West has produced only philosophers. The East knows nothing of philosophy, it knows only mysticism. And mysticism is based on the simple phenomenon that experience needs no argument.
Experience is its own validity.
And how else are we to interpret the teachings, and thereby assume that these people, these "non-philosophers" (Guatama Buddha, Bodhidarma, Jesus Christ, Lao Tzu), whose teachings are from "beyond the mind", are revealing "divine" truths- which are somehow to be interpreted as more "spiritual" and thereby (it seems as though you're assuming we are to deem them) "higher truths"...??
Is not all we have available to learn about these transcendental, prophetic, spiritual truth-tellers (whose teachings you say we should hold in higher esteem than the mere "philosophers")- is not all we have available to learn about these people, and thereby somehow come to "understand" the distinction you're attempting to convince people of, and seem to be convinced of yourself- is not all we have available to apparently come to this distinction which you claim to be obvious, evident and true- simply words!? Religious texts (and whether or not these texts contain completely factual and unaltered true depictions from "beyond the mind" of what these people had to proclaim, which you're suggesting deems them more believable and to be undestood as posessing higher truths in comparison to the "philosophers")- are these so-called "religious" texts apparently automatically to be presumed and interpreted as containing richer or some higher or more spiritual truth simply for the fact that they are known to be "religious" texts!?! Philosophers, and these "divine teachers propounding wisdom and truth from beyond the mind"- do not differ in that we only have (what we are to assume were) their words, their teachings, as our only way of understanding or learning anything about them whatsoever! So how does one then determine what seperates the merely intellectual "play on words" of the philosophers, in comparison to the "divine spiritual truths" of these "beyond the mind" religious people?
PS- when did "the East" come into the equation here as justification for the attempts you're attempting to explain as reasons to relegate Nietzsche's view on Christianity as merely being "intellectual" and "philosophical" and not "divine" like the "mystical Eastern spiritual teachers"- The East had nothing to do with his argument here, nor his philosophical viewpoint on the morality of Christianity and Jesus Christ? Is all you're saying that somehow the East is richer, more spiritually and truthfully valid- because it is based upon "experience" and not "science" or objectively proveable truths"!? 🤣
This explaning is such a work of art. I think I'll write it down.
I'll seek to read more of Nietzsche of course.
By now I think that his perpetual subterranean belief in "inferiority" and "superiority" was enough to make him reject God in every way.
Also the belief that by rejecting values, we are capable of creating new ones.
His transvaluations are a jump towards what rottens the human life, all types of instincts and lust, the same things Christianity says to abandon. He loudly screams all of his philosophy, being so hostile, and validating people that inhale and exhale debauchery, or provoking a mental trembling on other people - saying that everything someone believes is a weakness, oh! Weakness, his favourite accusation, that is against everything that does not belong to Nietzsche's mind - then he proceeds to put his hands on somoeone reading his works, ripping apart every undeveloped truth someone carried, that's how he influences...
why so less views . this guy deserve more ,love from India
🙏🏻
Looks like he has a big indian fanbase
Or from the good
The world gives according to my faith.
De knight of faith is a dancer with high elevation.
Ah yes, this must be their Easter episode - oh wait... :D
If anyone is familiar with the word Chinese whisper. How in the world are we supposed to believe the original interpretations of Christianity held up for 3k years? and that the accumulation of what we know as the Bible is any different than what a history book is, and we all know who writes history. My conclusion is like what some others have said. The Bible is a source we can gain great insight, wisdom, and guidance from, but we need to keep in mind that almost all of it can’t be meant as literal interpretations, and however many people responsible for translating it over the years could have been less than perfect in translation, and also have the possibility to alter intended meanings.
I have thought this as well. One thing I find interesting is how Christians will not say “oh God” because it is “using Gods name in vain” While they refuse to accept that those who translated the Bible, or Popes, Kings, and people in power throughout history have not used Gods name in vain by altering or falsifying the interpretation of the Bible. Jesus’ teachings wouldn’t be politically beneficial if people actually lived like Jesus.
@@ambersgrace1 error correcting code?
“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.”
― Mahatma Gandhi
“Between the Christianity of this land and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference-so wide that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the friend of the one is of necessity to be the enemy of the other. I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ; I therefore hate the corrupt, slave-holding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land. Indeed, I can see no reason but the most deceitful one for calling the religion of this land Christianity…”
― Frederick Douglass
Cringe
Excellent.Well Narrated and, very Clear.❤
Jesus was the Übermensch, literally transcended a mere will to power, though was fully capable of having every earthly desire fulfilled. It’s the archetype of the benevolent king. It’s game B. It’s the recognition that all that we love about existence itself can only continue if we don’t fall into tit for tat feuds. What’s difficult is having the weight of this reality on your shoulders. Can one say they really believe if they don’t embody it?
Love this guy.
Me too
Am I going crazy or is their a cat meowing at me
There really isn't any contradiction between Paul and Jesus when putting verses in their proper context.
Cesare Borgia, and the Boriga family were no saints. Interesting that Nietzsche praises him.
I love knowledge for the mind body and soul
I'm thinking that if you tried living by the words of Christ alone out of your red-letter Bible, you could probably reconcile that with what Nietzsche had to say here.
Jesus is the Living God. He is a Person. He came to me and hasn't left and I have so many experiences proving He is real, totally loving and always right.
Experiences proving? I'm a Christian too - I never had any. I'll never be able to prove Him. Only, only by faith, to someone who is open, and already has faith. Life is absurd without God, however, I think faith is also an absurd. But I really need to abandon my sins.
Are you open to debate?
Thanks for posting, I'm reading The anti Christ, i find this very helpful.
Every "Christian" should listen to this, think on what is said, and work to free themselves of their delusion
This is a very generous reading of Nietzsche's brutal criticism of Christianity.
Read part 2 of Nietzsche's "Genealogy of Morals"
I like many of his ‘exclamations’ - but, if we can agree there is a Christ then this most greatest conquering of peoples, tongues and nations - these are not accidents or chance!
He - Christ himself wills this into existence.
Jesus Christ
Although it’s courageous to explore new philosophies that contradict religious dogma the madnesses he experienced after publishing his antichrist book is not surprising... free thinkers are much appreciated however fanatics may have gone wild with angry resentment against his discourse to cause his madness and rebuke both the book and the writer’s competence ... people do react demonically when confronted with newer thought that crushes their sacred beliefs ... a word to the wise is both good and evil are always present in life so we choose our fate accordingly 😎
Don't drink to the cup of human kindness it's a strange brew and poison to the touch.
Buddhism declares that one has "erred" as opposed to sinned. Not a huge difference in morality.
Error can change to truth by right actions
But sin can only be forgiven by god
When I am in heaven.
That is not a small difference.
@@satnamo wrong, you just have to confess, not confess in “heaven”. There’s obviously differences, but a lot of meanings and archetypes are very similar if not the same between the philosophies.
If Nietzsche haven't been such a hardened sceptic, he would have realized that extraordinary people who were Christian DID exist. They were called Catholic Saints!
But Buddhism has a loftiness even Nietzsche could not reach. In ones youth one is Dionysos (ie the crucified) but in age the Buddha.
De eternal bliss of nirvana lies,
that blessed state of heavenly calm obtained by expiation,
lies in my mind at rest
I always thought Nietzsche's book Anti-Christ was a pseudonym for something else, but to my surprise, it is actually what it means. Lol Ignorant me
Also, that flute music mesmerised me ;)
Glad you liked it! :)
That philosopher thought Machiavelli was the ideal philosophy. The life of crime and anarchy uninhibited by christianity and christian conscience is what Nietzche was basically teaching.He got his wish with the nazis,whom he would have admired most of the way. he is responsible for them.
Read the book yourselves.
why? i dont really have the time....
@@privatprivat7279 for why: you might learn something new and for the time I MYSELF have to find it P
It's a good book
He is devoid of wisdom. It's all cerebral knowledge and arrogance of scholastic intelligence he's got.
The things of the Spirit are foolishness to the mere man
No it’s spiritual
Madness to the Greeks, and scandal to the Jews
Ironic, I'm the 666th like
I hope someone outsmarts me but that was meant for me 😂 I don't believe in sacrilege I actually hate the word Antichrist I just want to be a person who strives to do their best with no unethical tyranny oppression or imprisonment absolutely necessary. My values will be Rock solid and of course I'm not a politician so I'm not going to do what you guys think is right I'll do exactly the proper things to preserve religion and their freedoms but I must buckle down hard on things that are actually not at ethical. Please question me I want you guys to pick me apart. I must be able to give you enlightenment and a polite manner and acknowledge your wrongs and mine if they occur we're all human I'm only 20 😅🤗
I had to walk away from the church because they disavowed Jesus' teachings and made him into an idol.
Glorious Qur'an about Jesus peace and blessings be upon him
5:116
وَإِذْ قَالَ ٱللَّهُ يَـٰعِيسَى ٱبْنَ مَرْيَمَ ءَأَنتَ قُلْتَ لِلنَّاسِ ٱتَّخِذُونِى وَأُمِّىَ إِلَـٰهَيْنِ مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ ۖ قَالَ سُبْحَـٰنَكَ مَا يَكُونُ لِىٓ أَنْ أَقُولَ مَا لَيْسَ لِى بِحَقٍّ ۚ إِن كُنتُ قُلْتُهُۥ فَقَدْ عَلِمْتَهُۥ ۚ تَعْلَمُ مَا فِى نَفْسِى وَلَآ أَعْلَمُ مَا فِى نَفْسِكَ ۚ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ عَلَّـٰمُ ٱلْغُيُوبِ ١١٦
When Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary, did you tell people, “Take me and my mother as gods besides Allah?” He wills say, “Glory be to You! It is not for me to say what I have no right. Had I said so, You would have surely known it. You know what is within myself, whereas I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, You are the All-Knower of all unseen.
👤
Danish accent?
English accent
Friedrich did do a hiccup and that was on the unity part he is not a unity of god, but he became that one man to unite people in a time of need and new beliefs. He was no god just a dummy as he pointed out, a stupid meanless sacrifice that had eyes laid upon by a city, a city of snakes and fools that wanted a purpose to believe or go against due to their own thoughts of what they would consider "bad" not evil or something else and if true punishment will come to them.
3 ads in ten minutes. come on man!
Greed is like salt water
a great name....no wonder he ended insane after understanding this shit world.
I hate the antichrist
As a Christian I made is 3:24. He is so lacking in understanding of God that to listen on is pure waste.
I can assume you have a iq of a rock
Wow yummy
No, humanoids of 3D matter we come way before your physical matter, we r light and pure DNA and ascending every Charles within oneself, we r all gods through love & light and vibrations & frequencies. Being reincarnated until u blah blah blah
Couple of years ago i heard of Nietzsche as great writer, and i hoping He was...
After hearing this I can say He's another blind man in this world full of same pity blind and deaf ppl
What a dissapointment...
Jesus Christ is Lord, Savior, Redeemer, King, and is Love itself. This man's pride got in the way of seeing the truth found only in the cross. He was emotional not logical.
You failed to provide any logical evidence to counter his argument.
He obviously didn’t understand Jesus Christ. A true Christian has nothing to do with religion.
There is only 1 true Christian and he dies on a + sign
@@satnamo Jesus Christ died for our sins on the cross. If anyone accepts him as lord and savior, they are saved through his precious and holy blood. True Christianity shows in our daily walk and struggles. Jesus Christ said the world hated him and Christians will be hated as well. Christianity is not just proclaiming to be Christian, it means following Christ example to the best of our human ability. We seek and ask Father God for answers and understanding by praying, reading His word and fasting. No one is perfect but the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. God bless ✝️🕊🙏🏻
“A true Christian had nothing to do with religion.” Exactly. That’s the point.
Being too religious is the same as being false to God, like a friendship without personality. Like a merely hired friend who uses a script to talk to the other.
The more I hear about Nietzsche, the more i see how highly regarded he is and the more i see the cult of personality around him, the more I realize just how silly he really was. Masquerading as profound philosopher and a deep thinker, he truly was just a lost soul, stuck in the mire of his own insanity. I pity him.
Or maybe it's just how people interpret his works... Idk. I've never read his stuff myself.
What’s insane is a European culture following Jewish doctrine/messiah.
There is no difference between progressive liberalism and Christianity. Equality has never been nor ever shall be the true law. The law of nature.
I'm going to have to say Nietzsche was absolutely wrong about Christianity.
Christ was divine. Christianity is sinful men's attempt at achieving divinity, which comes off as false and hypocritical, especially in the western world where the christian has one foot in Heaven and the other in the world.
at one point you just rant like a red scared american its kinda gross