I started doing this for the first time about 5 years ago. Needless to say, it changed my life, literally!. I had always found my previous guitar recordings to lack that feel of space.
Very nice explanation of M/S. For those who use Logic, you can record the Mid mic to the left side of a stereo linked track, and the Side mic to the right side, and then use the Direction Mixer plug-in to decode the M/S signal. That way you don’t need to duplicate the Side track and phase flip one copy, and you don’t need to create a Summing Stack. You can control the Side level with the Width control in the plug-in.
This is a brilliant way to track acoustics. It really captures the fullness of the tone and allows you to direct it at the sweet spot of the acoustic. This is great man!
After watching this, how could I not subscribe?! Your vids are so effortlessly watchable......perfect blend of charisma, knowledge and talent. Glad to have found you.....thanks old bean!
I know this video is a couple years old, but thought I'd mention... Imo, the issue with this method is that if you mono sum the audio, the "side" tracks disappear again, like it was before you panned them. I think it's important to build a stereo image that does not disappear when listening in mono. It may be a better option, rather than inverting the phase of the duplicate track, pan them left and right as you did, but bump the duplicate track back 10ms or so, making sure they're in phase, but the time delay gives the stereo image instead.
kind of a Haas effect, thats what i do, except i do unique left and right takes, playing them as much close to each other. Not sure, if thats a good technique..
What you're describing is not mid side at all though - it's cool to do, it's just not MS and you're not getting the 'direction' of the side mic and it's a different sound. I guess you have to consider how important the mono sum mix actually IS. IN any case, MS gives you a solid centre that doesn't disappear in mono at all - you just lose the width. En hindi language not sure what happens with your technique when listening in mono.
Finally! Someone who gets it! Bravo! This should be ear opening and eye-opening, for others. Thank you! LMAO Yes I have enjoyed using the MS microphone technique for almost 40 years now. One of the great things about it. Is being able to adjust the stereo width. From ultra wide to, ultra narrow. Or mono as we call it. Middle as it is. Monophonic stereo. Of a single sound source coming out of both speakers, equally. Mono as in middle as in Monaural. And of course the beauty of this technique. You are pointing the microphone. That is the primary pickup microphone. Directly at the sound source. Precisely where you want it. Then the side microphone. It has such an incredible mid null point. That it's only picking up the acoustic ambience to the left and to the right. But combining both that left and right. Into a single channel. Called the, Difference Channel. And that is actually the way in which, FM broadcasting. Was made compatible. On both stereo and mono, receivers. FM is not broadcast as left and right channels. It's broadcast as, Middle and Side or Mono and Difference. So it really does not require 3 channels at all. It only requires the original 2. But from that. You actually derive, three separate channels. Left-Center-Right. And the left channel and right channel information is decoded through, multiplexing. In other words it's something of a carrier wave. That has 2 channels embedded, within it. That requires the Middle Mono, channel. To extract. Those other 2 separate channels left and right. It was also a technique used when recording to some, NAB, tape cartridges. Back in the good old days before digital. With the stereo was suffering greatly from head, azimuth, misalignment. And that would sound terrible in mono. Creating a muddy sound. But if you encoded your tape, for stereo. In that MS manner. Regardless of head azimuth error. That would simply make the stereo imaging going wider and narrower. And was popular to use in that manner, also. I use it for all sorts of stereo effects. Now to do this truly the correct way. You're supposed to have essentially, matching cardioid and bidirectional, microphones. With matching capsules. Essentially. So as to be, true to form. But really any cardioid and bidirectional microphone can be used together. And get this great ethereal sounding 3 channels of stereo. With 100% mono compatibility! Recordable on only 2 channels. Ain't that somethin'? What will they think of next? So great to see and hear somebody finally using this fabulous technique of stereo MICing. Recording jazz drums with an MS overtop. And a bass drum microphone. It is absolutely, elegant sounding. Rudy Van Gelder would be proud. But yes sir re-Bob. Using that center mono capacitor a.k.a. condenser microphone. Coupled with a Symmetrical, bidirectional ribbon. And I stress, Symmetrical. Because! There are a number of, modern day, asymmetrical, figure of 8, ribbon microphones. They do not have the same response on the front side as the backside. They are both different. And while you could do MS with one of those also. I wouldn't know which side to advise you on. To have which polar tailored response on which side? And how would one determine that? With an, Asymmetrical, bidirectional, ribbon microphone? So it all comes down on what kind of bidirectional ribbon or condenser microphone you got. Though, I must admit. I love using a pair of Beyer M-160 coupled with the M-130, short geometry, dual ribbon, microphones. As they each have 2 parallel to one another. And they sound really sweet as an MS stereo pair. And a great way to capture a Symphony Orchestra. It's a lovely technique also for recording vocals. And then you can play some cool stereo tricks. Like adding a little limiting or compression to your Side a.k.a. Difference channel. And then amazing at the enhanced stereo imaging you get. It's wild! Because you are merely enhancing the stereo information. Not the mono information. Of a single sound source. And that's hard for someone to wrap their head around. But that's the way to get a real stereo vocal. Where the singer is singing squarely into the Middle Mono, cardioid, capsule. And not pointing off to the left or to the right. But straight on. So I thank you, sir. For getting this all, absolutely right. As I am part of the MS enforcement police. Making sure no one is Amiss with their MS. In fact I am so much into MS. The doctors told me I took it too far. As I loved it so much. I came down with it. But that's a different kind of MS. That kills you. It's going to kill me. Not the microphone technique. No. The real thing. The real MS. The Multiple Sclerosis, of MS. The kind you don't want. Yeah, so it's not really requiring 3 channels. But it does on your audio console/mixer and/or in software. It requires 3. To pull this off. Otherwise it can actually be done. With a pair of matrix wired audio transformers. Which is the way it was first accomplished. It was a little box you would patch in your M channel and your S channel. And out came stereo. Isn't that amazing! Keeping it restricted to the original 2 channels only. I think you could've explained this a little bit better. But that's just me. You explained enough. You got it. Now you can run with it. Good job old boy RemyRAD
Wow. What a gold mine of info that comment is! I feel quite a sense of relief that you've seen this and signed off on it. Sorry to hear of the MS, I hope it's manageable. I learned from another commenter that Logic has a way of processing a mono file to extract the stereo, as your matrix wired transformers would (so, 2 tracks only). Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge and taking the time to feed back on the video.
Excellent. Thanks very much for this tip. Tried it with 2 AKG414’s and got a stunning result with an otherwise ordinary sounding old Yamaha acoustic. 😎👍
'First Take Jon' I have never heard that before, it made me laugh and rewind the video to hear it again. Delightful! Thank you for the explanation of mid side recording and the humour.
Mid-side is great, but I think it's often very easy and tempting to make it way too wide in the mix. I'd say a good starting point would be to imagine the size of the sound source, keeping in mind the distance it was recorded from / where you wanna put it in the soundstage, and trying to get the mid-side balance to match that.
I think it depends on the music. If it's a folk record and you want everything to sound fairly natural, sure. But for a dramatic rock record, or pop, wide and weird can work.
I do this regularly on acoustic guitar. I’ve also been doing this on electric guitars. Two different ways. One way is just like acoustic version but in front of the amp. The other is splitting the guitar and sending it to two amps with a cardioid mic on one amp and a ribbon or figure 8 mic on the other. Makes for a big sound.
Trying to get my head about the electric/dual amp miking. Do you do the whole MS thing with the two recordings? I'm wondering about phase etc if the mics are not in the same place.
Spent ages learning this via S. O. S. articles and forums. Great to see a tutorial. It’ll help me fast track through it again. “Old Martin!” ...subbed.
@@JonWrightMusicTV Dude - your channel is fab. Really succinct and to the point. Up there with Kush’s. Keep sharing your wisdom and knowledge!!! It’s truly appreciated and received with open arms.
Tip: If your mid/side recordings turn out lopsided (like in this video; more volume on the left channel) you can cheat a little bit and use the S1 Imager from Waves to balance the left and right channels.
Great sound! I've used a MKH 418-S to mic choral field recordings for a documentary, not the quietest mic, but I felt it would give some latitude in post mix.
You might get a similar effect... but it's not mid-side. The fig-8 mic is not in mono though, it's picking up from both side of the ribbon. The processing just allows you to separate the signals.
Well explained and nice demonstration! I know this wasn't covered but a lot has to be said for the sound of that guitar and the light touch you use when strumming. It contributes enormously to that really sweet, wispy tone you're getting. BTW - The U195 was one of the best acoustic guitar mics I ever owned. I miss it!!
Mid/side recording......interesting, I'll try that next time I'm recording acoustic, without reverb that's a personal choice I don't like reverb on acoustic guitar, that Martin acoustic you have is absolutely gorgeous, sounds great, keep on groovin' duder peace and love to you Brother Man ✌️😎
NIce...a really lovely sound...but I hear the guitar being slightly off center...maybe working with the level of the sides to move the image back to the center.
Wow, in ten minutes concise & completely clear for as good as newbie, thx! I wonder if one can pull this off with a directional mike and an omni instead of an 8 pattern (a very round eight as it were ;). I guess it might work since the duplicate / polarity makes it stereo, but maybe the bigger overlap with the cardioid... But I might be completely mistaken since I have the recording knowledge and ezperience of a maggot. What do you think? PS I got Line Audio CM4 (cardioid) and Line Audio OM1 (omni), btw insanely great mikes for acoustic at 10-15%% of the price of a Schoeps, made by a Swedish one man company, recommended by an friend (pro audio engineer), you might be interested. (I also do have a Behringer B-1 that can do 8 but lend it to someone).
Nice video Mr One Take. I do similar things, more often taking one side of a stereo recording and collapsing it to mono. Mono is very appealing, with music coming down the middle and the effects going into stereo. I have not however used the phase reverse technique from a mono source. You can do a lot with audio if you had a stereo source, creating a similar result by converting 1/2 to mono and doubling the second side for stereo, processing it separately. I’ve often heard mid/side referred to as mono/stereo, and what this has helped me understand is the 5.1 surround sound. Your mono source is up front and your stereo comes into the rear speakers. Thanks for the pro tips, much appreciated. -Jim
Thanks! It’s probably a bit wide for some. I was trying to make the stereo effect obvious for the purposes of demonstration. Hope it works out on sax, should be interesting?
Bok is nicely centred, but when blending the mid sides the left channel has more body (Probably the side facing the sound hole I guess) which gives more prominence to that side.
amazing work.. the comp part is such an imp point. Learnt a lot, i think M/S is imp tool to have in studio. Just deciding on a great bamboo flute microphone these days, will checkout other videos on your channel..
@@JonWrightMusicTV I finally settled on Austrian Audio OC818 pair. These are 2 microphones in 1, so 4 total, and can do mid side, blumlein etc. Great Value.
That's brilliant! My next acoustic rec will def be this way. Just recently got a ldc with switchable patterns, so that will probably be it's maiden rec, together with I guess the Sennheiser 421 for warmth. Or my sdc for clarity. Or nicer still perhaps put the Sennheiser on my own gave sweet spot (slightly pointed up from just under the bridge to the right of my strum hand, pointing at the soundboard right of the bridge in direction of the hole and then the sdc at your sweet spot (wich is new to me) to make it a stereo pair in addition to the 8.
I discovered recently that you can save yourself a bunch of hassle editing multiple-track comps in Logic by adding all the tracks to a VCA group while editing. You then go into the Group Settings panel and tick "editing", any changes between comps will then be made across all tracks in the VCA group (though it breaks if the number of takes in each folder are different)
Great video, already used this technique many times but stayed the 10 mins just because I enjoyed the way you explained it. And that bock mic sounds just fantastic!
Oh, interesting! I can't imagine you'll get much in the way of a stereo image since the source is mono (I am assuming)... but if the room is big or interesting and you're far away enough you might get something. For big trio sounds bi-amping might be a nice way to go...
@@JonWrightMusicTV It definitely was. My videos are less tech focused than yours, I think, but your presentation is so on point, every beginner should be able to follow on this. Great job, man!
Awesome!!! Thanks for this … I’ve heard of this but never understood how to do it. Still not quite sure I get why it works, but I kinda like the thought of some magic in the process! 😁
Awesome video Jon, just found your channel. You may not remember me as I do a bunch of different stuff but I run a Country music event in Essex called Nashville Calling, you and Liv played one of our Epping shows in 2019 (I did/do sound that night too). I converted one of my outbuildings into a little home studio 18 months ago and and learning some stuff. I'll give this technique a go as results look very interesting. Good luck with your channel, you got a great way of presenting too. So keep it going
I've been looking for a good answer re: how to mix mid'side into a bigger mix, or if it's even worth recording mid/side for an acoustic in a big mix, and you answered this question beautifully. Thank you!
i wish you would've shown a head on perspective of the mic placement for seeing where the mono mic was pointing exactly at on the guitar. really nice sound though
Liked and subscribed because this is the best guitar recording example I've seen and heard on RUclips. Great explanation and more importantly the finished product sounds amazing
Love M+S sound capture. In this instance it sounds kinda out of phase. It is uncomfortable with a headset. I wonder why you did not show that you can change the balance between M and S to control the width of the stereo image. Cheers!
The technique is correct - perhaps it sounds out of phase when flipping between mono? I did show that you can change the blend to control the width - maybe you missed that bit.
Thanks Ed. Go for it - you will be the second or third person to try it (that I know of) within hours of the video going up so you’re in good company! Look forward to hearing how it works out 💪
Thank you for a great how-to with beautiful reflective guitar piece. Do you think it would fit a folkish guitar and singer with voice in the middle wrapped by guitar?
Thank you, glad you enjoyed it. Yes, I think it would be ideal for that purpose and the benefit of MS is that you have as much, or as little of the stereo with as you like while capturing the ideal guitar tone with the mid mic. Good luck!
Great video, but the problem with recording guitar mid/side so close to the guitar is that one side (the body side) will always be louder, as is in your video too.
You sure do get that phenomenon but I think whether it's a problem is one of those subjective things. It's a rather interesting sound. You can always rotate the mid mic a touch or fiddle with the panning if it's truly bothersome. Thanks for your comment!
Well-presented tutorial - thank you! However, when I hear the stereo recording you produced for this video, it sounds like the rare occasion when I have inadvertently hooked up one of my loudspeakers out-of-phase with the other loudspeaker. It adds a certain tension that isn't pleasant. If you offset the duplicated track with a slight time shift/delay, and keep the hard Left and Right panning as you showed, it helps maintain that wonderful spacious stereo image, but it feels more natural/realistic - like sound reflections coming off different walls of a room - they don't arrive at your ear at exactly the same time.
Can I ask which part you’re talking about - a time stamp? To me the full part sounds as it should and the meters show it completely in phase (100%) in phase before reverb. Maybe it’s the stereo reverb you’re not enjoying.
@@JonWrightMusicTV It's especially noticeable when you introduce the panning Left and Right on the normal and inverted tracks, before you apply the reverb (around the 6:00 timestamp). It's less noticeable once the reverb is applied (as heard in the intro, and after you apply the reverb later on in the video). I'm suggesting that, rather than inverting the duplicated track, duplicate it and adjust the timing of both side tracks relative to each other, and relative to the mid track. That technique tends to provide a sense of space by mimicking the echoes one would expect to hear in a real club/hall. In fact, you can control the sense of space (the size of the room) by changing the size of the timing shift you apply to (either, or both of) the side channel(s), relative to the mid channel. To me, that tends to sound more pleasing/natural than the inverted channel technique. It's similar to the technique explained by Pete Celi in the Strymon Deco tutorial video (ruclips.net/video/ST8pp4HN554/видео.html), except we're not interested or using the "wobble" to cause a chorus effect in this case. But you can definitely hear the sense of space that the Deco pedal can produce by changing the timing of the signals in the left and right channels. To each his own, of course. Just want to reiterate the great video production - thanks for doing that!
No worries, I think it's an interesting discussion! What you're describing is an option for sure - though not one I've tried - but it isn't M/S. It's something else entirely I think. Thanks for the suggestion, I might give it a try...
Maybe I'm missing something.. When you flipped the phase, the sounds canceled each other out. When you pan them left and right, you're hearing them independently, so they come back. But won't those sounds cancel each other out again if played on a mono system like a phone or a club setting?
That’s the thing! This technique is quite preferable because you can have a nice stereo image when played in stereo, but you also maintain all the information and the punchy sound when you listen through a single speaker, cause you ve got two different sources covering each case, but also working very well together in the same time!
Yea really good question. The mid mic remains mono so is unaffected on a mono system. The sides will indeed cancel each other out so you lose the sides. As SixString says the beauty of this is that you have that ideal mono recording which still balances correctly with the rest of the mix, and while you lose the sides, they were really only give width - which you lose in mono anyway. For me it's a preferable outcome to summing an XY pair to mono.
All stereo signals work the same way. Mid/Side is present in any stereo sound. If you take any stereo track (like a complete song), and use a plugin that allows you to mute the center only and leave the side signal sounding (e.g. Izotope Ozone EQ in mid/side mode), then you'll have an identical signal in the sides that seem to sound in stereo, but they will cancel each other if you invert the phase of one of them and send both to the center or to the same side. The magic happens when you have both the center and the mid signals sounding at the same time, because the center actually cancels out many things in the side signal, but different for each side as they have inverted phases. Now, what makes this technique great is not the fact that it is mid/side, bacause you can process mid/side on any stereo recording. What makes it great is that you are using a single microphone for the center signal, and you can adjust that single microphone in a perfect position and sound of an instrument, and then just add the side signal to have the stereo image - but you keep a perfect sound in mono, which doesn't quite happen with regular stereo recording techniques.
The production quality of this channel is stupidly good. Wtf. Killer killer stuff here! I can’t wait to try this out in a session tomorrow
Thanks man
I started doing this for the first time about 5 years ago. Needless to say, it changed my life, literally!. I had always found my previous guitar recordings to lack that feel of space.
Amazing! It's quite something when you get it right
Very nice explanation of M/S. For those who use Logic, you can record the Mid mic to the left side of a stereo linked track, and the Side mic to the right side, and then use the Direction Mixer plug-in to decode the M/S signal. That way you don’t need to duplicate the Side track and phase flip one copy, and you don’t need to create a Summing Stack. You can control the Side level with the Width control in the plug-in.
Top tip! Thanks!
This is news to me but makes sense. Thank you for sharing that with us!
This is a brilliant way to track acoustics. It really captures the fullness of the tone and allows you to direct it at the sweet spot of the acoustic. This is great man!
Cheers Tico! Agreed in full!
After watching this, how could I not subscribe?! Your vids are so effortlessly watchable......perfect blend of charisma, knowledge and talent. Glad to have found you.....thanks old bean!
I feel so seen! Thanks old bean
I know this video is a couple years old, but thought I'd mention... Imo, the issue with this method is that if you mono sum the audio, the "side" tracks disappear again, like it was before you panned them. I think it's important to build a stereo image that does not disappear when listening in mono. It may be a better option, rather than inverting the phase of the duplicate track, pan them left and right as you did, but bump the duplicate track back 10ms or so, making sure they're in phase, but the time delay gives the stereo image instead.
kind of a Haas effect, thats what i do, except i do unique left and right takes, playing them as much close to each other. Not sure, if thats a good technique..
What you're describing is not mid side at all though - it's cool to do, it's just not MS and you're not getting the 'direction' of the side mic and it's a different sound.
I guess you have to consider how important the mono sum mix actually IS. IN any case, MS gives you a solid centre that doesn't disappear in mono at all - you just lose the width. En hindi language not sure what happens with your technique when listening in mono.
Never seen this mic arrangement before. I'm learning so much from you 🎉👏. And the playing is so soothing
Awesome! Thank you!
3 years later, I’m just now seeing this video. Great stuff. I have guitar parts that could benefit from this technique. Thank you for sharing!
My pleasure! Only 5 months later I saw your comment!
This guy is so humble and smart. Good teacher as well.
Thanks very much. I mean, I am SUPER humble - it’s one of my many great qualities 😉
Damn first real trick I have seen in a minute
Nice
Finally! Someone who gets it! Bravo! This should be ear opening and eye-opening, for others. Thank you! LMAO
Yes I have enjoyed using the MS microphone technique for almost 40 years now. One of the great things about it. Is being able to adjust the stereo width. From ultra wide to, ultra narrow. Or mono as we call it. Middle as it is. Monophonic stereo. Of a single sound source coming out of both speakers, equally. Mono as in middle as in Monaural.
And of course the beauty of this technique. You are pointing the microphone. That is the primary pickup microphone. Directly at the sound source. Precisely where you want it.
Then the side microphone. It has such an incredible mid null point. That it's only picking up the acoustic ambience to the left and to the right. But combining both that left and right. Into a single channel. Called the, Difference Channel. And that is actually the way in which, FM broadcasting. Was made compatible. On both stereo and mono, receivers. FM is not broadcast as left and right channels. It's broadcast as, Middle and Side or Mono and Difference.
So it really does not require 3 channels at all. It only requires the original 2. But from that. You actually derive, three separate channels. Left-Center-Right. And the left channel and right channel information is decoded through, multiplexing. In other words it's something of a carrier wave. That has 2 channels embedded, within it. That requires the Middle Mono, channel. To extract. Those other 2 separate channels left and right.
It was also a technique used when recording to some, NAB, tape cartridges. Back in the good old days before digital. With the stereo was suffering greatly from head, azimuth, misalignment. And that would sound terrible in mono. Creating a muddy sound. But if you encoded your tape, for stereo. In that MS manner. Regardless of head azimuth error. That would simply make the stereo imaging going wider and narrower. And was popular to use in that manner, also. I use it for all sorts of stereo effects.
Now to do this truly the correct way. You're supposed to have essentially, matching cardioid and bidirectional, microphones. With matching capsules. Essentially. So as to be, true to form. But really any cardioid and bidirectional microphone can be used together. And get this great ethereal sounding 3 channels of stereo. With 100% mono compatibility! Recordable on only 2 channels. Ain't that somethin'? What will they think of next?
So great to see and hear somebody finally using this fabulous technique of stereo MICing. Recording jazz drums with an MS overtop. And a bass drum microphone. It is absolutely, elegant sounding. Rudy Van Gelder would be proud.
But yes sir re-Bob. Using that center mono capacitor a.k.a. condenser microphone. Coupled with a Symmetrical, bidirectional ribbon. And I stress, Symmetrical. Because! There are a number of, modern day, asymmetrical, figure of 8, ribbon microphones. They do not have the same response on the front side as the backside. They are both different. And while you could do MS with one of those also. I wouldn't know which side to advise you on. To have which polar tailored response on which side? And how would one determine that? With an, Asymmetrical, bidirectional, ribbon microphone?
So it all comes down on what kind of bidirectional ribbon or condenser microphone you got. Though, I must admit. I love using a pair of Beyer M-160 coupled with the M-130, short geometry, dual ribbon, microphones. As they each have 2 parallel to one another. And they sound really sweet as an MS stereo pair. And a great way to capture a Symphony Orchestra.
It's a lovely technique also for recording vocals. And then you can play some cool stereo tricks. Like adding a little limiting or compression to your Side a.k.a. Difference channel. And then amazing at the enhanced stereo imaging you get. It's wild! Because you are merely enhancing the stereo information. Not the mono information. Of a single sound source. And that's hard for someone to wrap their head around. But that's the way to get a real stereo vocal. Where the singer is singing squarely into the Middle Mono, cardioid, capsule. And not pointing off to the left or to the right. But straight on.
So I thank you, sir. For getting this all, absolutely right. As I am part of the MS enforcement police. Making sure no one is Amiss with their MS.
In fact I am so much into MS. The doctors told me I took it too far. As I loved it so much. I came down with it. But that's a different kind of MS. That kills you. It's going to kill me. Not the microphone technique. No. The real thing. The real MS. The Multiple Sclerosis, of MS. The kind you don't want.
Yeah, so it's not really requiring 3 channels. But it does on your audio console/mixer and/or in software. It requires 3. To pull this off. Otherwise it can actually be done. With a pair of matrix wired audio transformers. Which is the way it was first accomplished. It was a little box you would patch in your M channel and your S channel. And out came stereo. Isn't that amazing! Keeping it restricted to the original 2 channels only.
I think you could've explained this a little bit better. But that's just me. You explained enough. You got it. Now you can run with it.
Good job old boy
RemyRAD
Wow. What a gold mine of info that comment is! I feel quite a sense of relief that you've seen this and signed off on it. Sorry to hear of the MS, I hope it's manageable. I learned from another commenter that Logic has a way of processing a mono file to extract the stereo, as your matrix wired transformers would (so, 2 tracks only). Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge and taking the time to feed back on the video.
Excellent. Thanks very much for this tip. Tried it with 2 AKG414’s and got a stunning result with an otherwise ordinary sounding old Yamaha acoustic. 😎👍
Amazing, that exactly what I’m talking about! Love the 414.
That's almost exactly what I'm doing today! Warm Audio WA-14 for side then Neumann TLM 103 for mid.
'First Take Jon' I have never heard that before, it made me laugh and rewind the video to hear it again. Delightful! Thank you for the explanation of mid side recording and the humour.
My pleasure! Thanks for saying hi 👍
So great to hear something I built with my hands used so effectively. Cheers from Seattle
Ulrigg! What a thrill - how nice to meet you. Thanks for making such nice gear!
Other then the technique.. i liked the guitar part you played..
Thank you!
This is the best explanation and demonstration of M/S technique I've seen. Slick production, too. Thank you!
Cheers Chris!
Mid-side is great, but I think it's often very easy and tempting to make it way too wide in the mix. I'd say a good starting point would be to imagine the size of the sound source, keeping in mind the distance it was recorded from / where you wanna put it in the soundstage, and trying to get the mid-side balance to match that.
I think it depends on the music. If it's a folk record and you want everything to sound fairly natural, sure. But for a dramatic rock record, or pop, wide and weird can work.
Lovely sounding recording, I've never liked stereo pairs on an acoustic.
Same here!
Very pro video and audio quality.
Glad you think so!
I do this regularly on acoustic guitar. I’ve also been doing this on electric guitars. Two different ways. One way is just like acoustic version but in front of the amp. The other is splitting the guitar and sending it to two amps with a cardioid mic on one amp and a ribbon or figure 8 mic on the other. Makes for a big sound.
Trying to get my head about the electric/dual amp miking. Do you do the whole MS thing with the two recordings? I'm wondering about phase etc if the mics are not in the same place.
Great channel with knowledgeable presenter! Very handful tip, definitely gonna try it. Subscribed immediately!
Thanks very much 👍
Spent ages learning this via S. O. S. articles and forums. Great to see a tutorial. It’ll help me fast track through it again.
“Old Martin!” ...subbed.
Thanks for being here and glad the channel is provide useful to you. Cheers!
@@JonWrightMusicTV Dude - your channel is fab. Really succinct and to the point. Up there with Kush’s. Keep sharing your wisdom and knowledge!!! It’s truly appreciated and received with open arms.
@@thefeelcompany Wow. That's extremely kind - I love Gregory!
Sweet demo. Concise and clear and stereo
Thanks man
Best mid side explanation video I’ve seen -Thank You!
Thanks very much! Glad it was clear 😊
great sound wide and clear
Thanks for listening
Audio is on point, subject is relevant, the dude even has a random colored light in the background... yet somehow
THANKYOU!!! No one ever talks about the coloured light 😄
But maybe he is on the rise?? He just showed up on my recommendations for the first time!!
Well, he's got 631 at the time of this comment.
713 now
1,02 k
Truly out of the box❤️💯 please avoid those critics, what sounds good is good❤️💯
Thank you, much appreciated!
Cool. Old prof of mine showed a similar trick in the past.
Probably the same trick!
Tip: If your mid/side recordings turn out lopsided (like in this video; more volume on the left channel) you can cheat a little bit and use the S1 Imager from Waves to balance the left and right channels.
This was really interesting..enjoyed this mate. Will give it a go x
Great sound!
I've used a MKH 418-S to mic choral field recordings for a documentary, not the quietest mic, but I felt it would give some latitude in post mix.
Oooh, interesting! Did it work as you hoped?
This is so cool!!! I'm definitely going to be using this in most if not all recordings I do. Thank you
You might get a similar effect... but it's not mid-side. The fig-8 mic is not in mono though, it's picking up from both side of the ribbon. The processing just allows you to separate the signals.
Well explained and nice demonstration! I know this wasn't covered but a lot has to be said for the sound of that guitar and the light touch you use when strumming. It contributes enormously to that really sweet, wispy tone you're getting. BTW - The U195 was one of the best acoustic guitar mics I ever owned. I miss it!!
That's very kind. Yes, it's a good guitar! U195 FTW - underrated...
Mid/side recording......interesting, I'll try that next time I'm recording acoustic, without reverb that's a personal choice I don't like reverb on acoustic guitar, that Martin acoustic you have is absolutely gorgeous, sounds great, keep on groovin' duder peace and love to you Brother Man ✌️😎
Thank you sir!
NIce...a really lovely sound...but I hear the guitar being slightly off center...maybe working with the level of the sides to move the image back to the center.
What a great clear explanation of mid/side, Jon. Thanks for that
Glad it was helpful!
Wow, in ten minutes concise & completely clear for as good as newbie, thx! I wonder if one can pull this off with a directional mike and an omni instead of an 8 pattern (a very round eight as it were ;). I guess it might work since the duplicate / polarity makes it stereo, but maybe the bigger overlap with the cardioid... But I might be completely mistaken since I have the recording knowledge and ezperience of a maggot. What do you think?
PS I got Line Audio CM4 (cardioid) and Line Audio OM1 (omni), btw insanely great mikes for acoustic at 10-15%% of the price of a Schoeps, made by a Swedish one man company, recommended by an friend (pro audio engineer), you might be interested. (I also do have a Behringer B-1 that can do 8 but lend it to someone).
dude thank you. I have the DAV BG1 and also a Art Pro MPA 2 which has a Mid/Side Matrix feature.
Love the BG-1!
Great tutorial never saw this technique before!
Glad it was helpful!
J40 - such a dream. Will try a MID Recording with mine (from 1994) today.
My brother! About the same year!
Nice video Mr One Take. I do similar things, more often taking one side of a stereo recording and collapsing it to mono. Mono is very appealing, with music coming down the middle and the effects going into stereo. I have not however used the phase reverse technique from a mono source. You can do a lot with audio if you had a stereo source, creating a similar result by converting 1/2 to mono and doubling the second side for stereo, processing it separately. I’ve often heard mid/side referred to as mono/stereo, and what this has helped me understand is the 5.1 surround sound. Your mono source is up front and your stereo comes into the rear speakers. Thanks for the pro tips, much appreciated. -Jim
My pleasure, and thank you for the feedback. That mono compatibility is so useful.
Is that a J-40? Maybe the most under-appreciated acoustic out there. That and the similar m36.
Brilliant
Cheers!
Very nice breakdown of the technique.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Thank you for the clear explanation of this recording technique!
My pleasure my treasure
Excellent video ! The guitar tends to sound too wide for my taste, but when I lay my hands on a figure 8 mic, I'll try this on a saxophone.
Thanks! It’s probably a bit wide for some. I was trying to make the stereo effect obvious for the purposes of demonstration. Hope it works out on sax, should be interesting?
As mentioned in the video, the level of the side signal allows you to control the width of the sound, from a lot (and more) to none at all.
Bok is nicely centred, but when blending the mid sides the left channel has more body (Probably the side facing the sound hole I guess) which gives more prominence to that side.
Exactly correct
amazing work.. the comp part is such an imp point. Learnt a lot, i think M/S is imp tool to have in studio. Just deciding on a great bamboo flute microphone these days, will checkout other videos on your channel..
Thank for watching. I think my channel needs more bamboo flute tech videos.
@@JonWrightMusicTV I finally settled on Austrian Audio OC818 pair. These are 2 microphones in 1, so 4 total, and can do mid side, blumlein etc. Great Value.
The quality here is damn!!!! I hope you takeoff soon!
Thanks man 👍
Thank you! Best way to conclude this year. Beautiful playing and teaching!
You're very welcome, and I appreciate the kind words. A belated HNY to you!
Damn sounds amazing. Lovely playing
Thanks matey
Lots of great tips here. Thanks 🙏🏼
Thank you!
That's brilliant! My next acoustic rec will def be this way. Just recently got a ldc with switchable patterns, so that will probably be it's maiden rec, together with I guess the Sennheiser 421 for warmth. Or my sdc for clarity. Or nicer still perhaps put the Sennheiser on my own gave sweet spot (slightly pointed up from just under the bridge to the right of my strum hand, pointing at the soundboard right of the bridge in direction of the hole and then the sdc at your sweet spot (wich is new to me) to make it a stereo pair in addition to the 8.
Lovely options - I hope you enjoy experimenting and get some exciting sounds.
I discovered recently that you can save yourself a bunch of hassle editing multiple-track comps in Logic by adding all the tracks to a VCA group while editing. You then go into the Group Settings panel and tick "editing", any changes between comps will then be made across all tracks in the VCA group (though it breaks if the number of takes in each folder are different)
Absolutely - thanks for sharing that tip
Great video, already used this technique many times but stayed the 10 mins just because I enjoyed the way you explained it. And that bock mic sounds just fantastic!
This made my day. Glad it’s bearable for some without the need for the info!
This is pure gold information ! Thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
thanks, I'm trying it on a guitar cabinet, you need all the sound you can get as the only guitar in a trio!
Oh, interesting! I can't imagine you'll get much in the way of a stereo image since the source is mono (I am assuming)... but if the room is big or interesting and you're far away enough you might get something. For big trio sounds bi-amping might be a nice way to go...
Great acoustic recording tip. Thanks.
Glad you liked it!
Beautiful. Thank you Jon ☺️
My pleasure!
I just learned what a Track Stack is... :p
also nice playing!
Now you know!
Very nice sound. I like this M/S stuff.
Thanks. Agreed!
Nice.
Sounds brilliant.
How does this (pardon the pun) pan out in mono? Is there some, or all, cancellation of the 2 side panned tracks?
Wonderfully done and great explanations. I have only used mid side stuff for my drum rooms so far, might give it a try on my acoustic next time.
Thank you - glad it was useful!
@@JonWrightMusicTV It definitely was. My videos are less tech focused than yours, I think, but your presentation is so on point, every beginner should be able to follow on this. Great job, man!
Awesome!!! Thanks for this … I’ve heard of this but never understood how to do it. Still not quite sure I get why it works, but I kinda like the thought of some magic in the process! 😁
Oh it's 100% magic. I wouldn't even try to understand to be honest - let the dark arts remain a mystery
very nice sound!!
Thank you 😋
Great video, Jon! That technique is really useful and it sounds lovely.
Ah, thank you. It's a good old guitar
Awesome video Jon, just found your channel. You may not remember me as I do a bunch of different stuff but I run a Country music event in Essex called Nashville Calling, you and Liv played one of our Epping shows in 2019 (I did/do sound that night too). I converted one of my outbuildings into a little home studio 18 months ago and and learning some stuff. I'll give this technique a go as results look very interesting. Good luck with your channel, you got a great way of presenting too. So keep it going
Yes I remember! Of course - that was a fun night. Thanks for comments and good luck with the studio and recording!
I've been looking for a good answer re: how to mix mid'side into a bigger mix, or if it's even worth recording mid/side for an acoustic in a big mix, and you answered this question beautifully. Thank you!
It’s a good question! Thanks for your feedback, so good to know it helped someone!
Cheers Jon, great explanation and gorgeous sound. Go raibh míle maith agat!
Thanks very much, glad you enjoyed!
i wish you would've shown a head on perspective of the mic placement for seeing where the mono mic was pointing exactly at on the guitar. really nice sound though
I think the moving camera gives the best perspective - I find the head on perspective is actually quite misleading to be honest
great explanation thank you sir
You are so welcome!
Thank you for this video. It was very helpful.
I'm so glad!
Liked and subscribed because this is the best guitar recording example I've seen and heard on RUclips. Great explanation and more importantly the finished product sounds amazing
This warms my heart - thank you
Love M+S sound capture. In this instance it sounds kinda out of phase. It is uncomfortable with a headset. I wonder why you did not show that you can change the balance between M and S to control the width of the stereo image. Cheers!
The technique is correct - perhaps it sounds out of phase when flipping between mono? I did show that you can change the blend to control the width - maybe you missed that bit.
Amazing tutorial ! Thanks !! I'll try this asap
My pleasure!
So happy algorithm brought me here
That algo... I’m happy too!
Great stuff. I love Mid/side!
Thanks Eric! Me too 👍
Nicely done. Have a feeling that Martin would sound amazing recorded onto a knackered old cassette deck:)
Thanks mate. Yes - this is an issue. I'll visiting this topic at some point because as you suggest the guitar does help things quite a bit...
This is a great video, you’re smashing it mate. And this is a tip I am literally going to try now 😀👌
Thanks Ed. Go for it - you will be the second or third person to try it (that I know of) within hours of the video going up so you’re in good company! Look forward to hearing how it works out 💪
Great video
Thanks Carl
So cool!
Cheers!
Yeppp that sounded great!
Thanks man!
Thanks for the tips man !!
Really helps to just have a starting point :)
My pleasure my treasure
Thank you for a great how-to with beautiful reflective guitar piece. Do you think it would fit a folkish guitar and singer with voice in the middle wrapped by guitar?
Thank you, glad you enjoyed it. Yes, I think it would be ideal for that purpose and the benefit of MS is that you have as much, or as little of the stereo with as you like while capturing the ideal guitar tone with the mid mic. Good luck!
Really good vid. Thanks
You’re welcome sir
Thanks, gonna try this.
Enjoy - hope it's useful to you!
Very nice. Cheers!
Thank you! Cheers!
Subscribed 👍
Super informative, well explained, sounds lush.
And, I'm just about to drop cash on first mic(s) for a home set up, so perfect timing.
Welcome! I'm glad it was helpful - hope the new purchase works out
REALLY NICE
Cheers!
Really well done all around. subbed.
Thanks man
Great info to know. Thank you
Pleasure!
Great job man! Perfect content. Light, sound, voice!
Thank you sir
Tried this today, sounded amazing!
So glad to hear that - happy it's working for you Jacob!
Great video, but the problem with recording guitar mid/side so close to the guitar is that one side (the body side) will always be louder, as is in your video too.
You sure do get that phenomenon but I think whether it's a problem is one of those subjective things. It's a rather interesting sound. You can always rotate the mid mic a touch or fiddle with the panning if it's truly bothersome. Thanks for your comment!
Well-presented tutorial - thank you! However, when I hear the stereo recording you produced for this video, it sounds like the rare occasion when I have inadvertently hooked up one of my loudspeakers out-of-phase with the other loudspeaker. It adds a certain tension that isn't pleasant. If you offset the duplicated track with a slight time shift/delay, and keep the hard Left and Right panning as you showed, it helps maintain that wonderful spacious stereo image, but it feels more natural/realistic - like sound reflections coming off different walls of a room - they don't arrive at your ear at exactly the same time.
Can I ask which part you’re talking about - a time stamp? To me the full part sounds as it should and the meters show it completely in phase (100%) in phase before reverb. Maybe it’s the stereo reverb you’re not enjoying.
@@JonWrightMusicTV It's especially noticeable when you introduce the panning Left and Right on the normal and inverted tracks, before you apply the reverb (around the 6:00 timestamp). It's less noticeable once the reverb is applied (as heard in the intro, and after you apply the reverb later on in the video). I'm suggesting that, rather than inverting the duplicated track, duplicate it and adjust the timing of both side tracks relative to each other, and relative to the mid track. That technique tends to provide a sense of space by mimicking the echoes one would expect to hear in a real club/hall. In fact, you can control the sense of space (the size of the room) by changing the size of the timing shift you apply to (either, or both of) the side channel(s), relative to the mid channel. To me, that tends to sound more pleasing/natural than the inverted channel technique. It's similar to the technique explained by Pete Celi in the Strymon Deco tutorial video (ruclips.net/video/ST8pp4HN554/видео.html), except we're not interested or using the "wobble" to cause a chorus effect in this case. But you can definitely hear the sense of space that the Deco pedal can produce by changing the timing of the signals in the left and right channels. To each his own, of course. Just want to reiterate the great video production - thanks for doing that!
No worries, I think it's an interesting discussion! What you're describing is an option for sure - though not one I've tried - but it isn't M/S. It's something else entirely I think. Thanks for the suggestion, I might give it a try...
so great
This sounds amazing! I am definitely going to give this a go.
Thanks - glad it was helpful!
Really interesting to hear about! Keep it up ☺️🎸
Glad you enjoyed!
0:28, Could you please tell me what those chords are? They're beautiful 🥺❤️
It’s just triads in G with an open G string drone throughout x
Maybe I'm missing something.. When you flipped the phase, the sounds canceled each other out. When you pan them left and right, you're hearing them independently, so they come back. But won't those sounds cancel each other out again if played on a mono system like a phone or a club setting?
This was my question too! I hope he answers, I can't wait to try this technique.
That’s the thing! This technique is quite preferable because you can have a nice stereo image when played in stereo, but you also maintain all the information and the punchy sound when you listen through a single speaker, cause you ve got two different sources covering each case, but also working very well together in the same time!
Yea really good question. The mid mic remains mono so is unaffected on a mono system. The sides will indeed cancel each other out so you lose the sides. As SixString says the beauty of this is that you have that ideal mono recording which still balances correctly with the rest of the mix, and while you lose the sides, they were really only give width - which you lose in mono anyway. For me it's a preferable outcome to summing an XY pair to mono.
@@JonWrightMusicTV Totally makes sense, thank you!
All stereo signals work the same way. Mid/Side is present in any stereo sound. If you take any stereo track (like a complete song), and use a plugin that allows you to mute the center only and leave the side signal sounding (e.g. Izotope Ozone EQ in mid/side mode), then you'll have an identical signal in the sides that seem to sound in stereo, but they will cancel each other if you invert the phase of one of them and send both to the center or to the same side. The magic happens when you have both the center and the mid signals sounding at the same time, because the center actually cancels out many things in the side signal, but different for each side as they have inverted phases. Now, what makes this technique great is not the fact that it is mid/side, bacause you can process mid/side on any stereo recording. What makes it great is that you are using a single microphone for the center signal, and you can adjust that single microphone in a perfect position and sound of an instrument, and then just add the side signal to have the stereo image - but you keep a perfect sound in mono, which doesn't quite happen with regular stereo recording techniques.