Yes ...that is the only thing that he got wrong. My CANON SX50hs has a separate charger that plugs into the wall. Otherwise this guy has a great persona in front of thecamera. great job.
Nice review, you convinced me not to buy the Nikon, but definitely didn't convinced me that the Sony is better than the Canon. A few points to be noticed when comparing the Canon against the Sony: The Canon is lighter and smaller; It supports RAW file format; It has a flash shoe for an external flash; Actually, despite what you said, it does have a charger so you don't need to charge the batteries inside the camera; It has a supersonic zoom speed, that is why you noticed it's zoom as the fastest; It's display can do a FULL flip-out and is easier to see in outdoor conditions; It shoots faster (13 fps against 10 fps from Sony); It can record in slow motion (even 240 fps but not so good resolution). But I recognize that the Sony has 12800 ISO against only 6400 from the Canon. I'm not saying Canon is better, I'm only saying it has a lot of advantages over the Sony, so I don't understand how you came to the conclusion that the Sony is better in overall. I would like to understand why you said that because I'm doing a research and still don't know if I'll buy the Canon SX50 or the Sony HX300. I want a good camera to take pictures AND full hd videos.
did u make ur choice? i, too, am torn between the canon and sony. i see many reviews saying the canon is better, but doesnt the low megapixel effects it in any way?
Two things: I know that the Canon will shoot in RAW and the Nikon will not, if you like to use software for adjusting your image. Also this review says the batteries are only chargeable within the camera itself. You can inexpensively purchase extra batteries and an external charger for the Canon from E-Bay or other outlets that will allow you to charge one while using another.
Great review, but I guess some facts need to be corrected: the Canon SX50 has an external battery charger, the battery cannot be charged by the camera.
one singular reason why the hx300 falls behind the sx50hs is the use of 20 mp. the more pixels you put, the more noise it creates. there is an optimum limit of megapixels for a particular sized sensor, where it peaks it's performance. beyond it pic quality deteriorates. 20 mp is just a marketing gimmick & may help sometimes when creating very huge posters; but why would u use this camera for creating for that purpose????
Camera comparison snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Sony-Cyber-Shot-DSC-HX300 snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P520
Please make a direct comparison between the new models Canon SX50HS, Nikon P600 & Sony DSC HX400V. I am really confused to choose between these cameras.
Sony HX300 is best camera. I have already Sony DSLR, Really good picture quality. 20 MP and Focusing at zero milimeter ist good feature. Electronic view finder quality is ok not like DSLR A67. No Raw picture format.
Hi sorry for my English. Do you know.why on the hx300 the videos highest quality stop after 30 seconds even if i have an empty memory card 8g? On the screen you can read 21 minute of recording free but when i record it lasts only 30 seconds. Do you know why? On the other video qualities the videos last a bit more but always they don't correspond To the time put on the screen. Ciao
And the facts say, Canon SX50 HS takes the best photos. I have been a amuture photographer for the past 15 years. I only ever use two cameras, both Canon and one been the SX50.
I have owned the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300/BC 20.4 MP Digital Camera with 50x Optical Zoom and 3-Inch Xtra Fine LCD (Black) for 3 years and I have won NUMEROUS Awards with it for my photography it is an Outstanding portrait camera , Mine dose have to be plugged into wall charger or computer to recharge but other then that ,I have no complaints except I need a new one and am scared to death others wont live up to my Sony, Yes I use other cameras I have Nikon 5200, Nikon 3100, Canon Rebel 5, and Canon ESO 80 D, I do fine art photography, portraits, Weddings and would not trade my Sony for anything, How can I have it refurbished .
FYI friend the Canon SX50 HSdoes not have to be charged 'in-camera'. I have had one for over a year now and I still get blown away using it! Bravo Canon!
Dude! Nice Video Comparison, but you want to tone down the amount of blush (or rouge?) you are using on your cheeks. It made it very hard to focus on what you were saying with *that* much make-up on. Thanks! ; ^ D
My Friend,, You Talk so much, and don't make the comparison corretment. That you make wich one, need to make exactily the same thing wich other. It to Us compare not you. Tank's
Yo he probado la canon, la sony y también la lumix fz200, y he optado por la sony por tener mayores ventajas que las otras dos, antes tuve canon y me parecia muy buena en las imágenes, pero esta vez sony la ha superado con su interfaz de usuario su modo automático y la opcion de zoom manual... los colores en este modelo ya han sido mejorados... si van a escoger la mas completa elijan dsc-hx300 sin duda
This is a manipulated review, probably a paid one. Whe this guy was featuring p520 he was showing the camera in real action, but during reviewing sony and canon he just showed a premade picture. Just watch the review attentively, you will see that sony and canon camera were never in real action. What sucks about this guy is that he is telling a pure lie. When you keep your camera and move it on Lens of each camera vibrates, and it is universal as the lens tries to adjust the picture. I have canon I definitely feel the vibratration in my canon.
I did lots more research and ordered the Sony HX400 for $419 from 42nd St. Photo this week. Mine won't have GPS, but I don't need it. The Sony's Wi-Fi might be useful. I needed a microphone input that most superzooms lack. The Sony has a hotshoe that accepts their adjustable stereo mics (and has a mic out ability to send the signal to a mixer, etc. for processing.) The Sony seems to focus faster than the others, and the ability to manually focus is a plus.
I have the sx50,great camera, you were wrong about all cameras batteries charge in camera, the sx50 has a charger and can be charged just by taking the battery out and putting it in the charger.
All comes down to image quality Andrew You can include all the bells and whistles you want..Gps Wifi..you name it but in the end the Canon's image quality blows the other two out of the water
enjoyed your video ..Have seen terrific videos made with the Canon .... The battery has been what has put me off as I do videos but I read in your comments that there is a battery charger ...???? big question here and VIP .I use Apple Mac and iMovie11 will the footage of this Canon be OK with this ....Not all Panasonic cams are
I have FZ200, and I want to sell it to buy Canon SX50 with longer reach. The FZ200 is great but the image quality is not good, I only got a crisp photos at 1600 by 1200 pixels photo size.
The Canon SX50 is a really good camera. Just recently purchased it and went to a Halloween Party and took lots of pictures of all the quest with their costumes and the pictures came out great. Better than I expected. Highly recommend.
Good Day Sir, Can you help me decide which of this 2 should i choose. Thanks in advance www.photographyblog.com/reviews/olympus_sp_720uz_review/specifications/ or www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_powershot_sx500_is_review/specifications/
Hello I have the canon sx50hs it does not need to be charged in camera and has a separate charger, which is better for image quality pot wise with the megapixel difference thank you
He completely underrated the Nikon! I have it and its a lot cheaper than the Canon and has nearly the same specs. Check out my full review on my channel
I got the HX300 last Friday. The lack of instructions supplied is annoying. Everything I am learning bit by bit. But for the life of me, I can not find half of the Picture Effects, Miniature mode and all the HDR effects are not on my menu. All I can see is Part red, green, blue and yellow filters, Pop, Toy and SftH key in the Picture Effects menu. Nothing to access any other special effects that other people say are on the camera. This camera needs a proper manual. Anyone help?
Andrew it's bad publicity to inform potential buyers of the canon SX50 to state that it's an on-board battery charge. It isn't as theARMORYchannel also pointed out. I have the SX30 model and both have external chargers provided in the package.
I like the canon sx50 alot but the battery problem annoying me becouse i want to buy extra battery... so is their any other camera have these features ( hight quality and resolution of pictures which if i crop the picture it will be still clear photo + great colours + fast stabilized zoom + face detection + viewfinder + mic indeed , I need camera for long term with less problems can you help me??? :)
pictures of the Canon at 1200mm is not what i would call usable. you cannot compare 50X zoom on a bridge to 50X zoom on binoculars. the 50X starts at wide angle while we as humans see things at roughly 45mm equiv. i recall. And then there is the lack of dynamic range of image sensors compared to our eyes. it is very hard to see animals in the shadows with an evf. Then there is resolution. your screen is just not as sharp as your vision.
Read my comments, idiot. I said I've used the Canon and wasn't impressed. IF the Sony ends up sucking, I'll return it just like I did the Canon. I've looked at comparison pics and have seen good and bad things in both. I just know I don't like the Canon, so I'm giving the HX300 a try. If you can't handle that, well, I'm sorry. This video wasn't the deciding factor on my choosing the Sony, but the comment I originally replied to did help me choose the HX300 over the HX200V.
And by "all" you mean "a few"? I admit, I haven't had the chance to use the Sony, but I have used the Canon, and wasn't impressed. I did mention two things he mentions in the video, but because I observed those things myself, not because he said it in the video. And again, color doesn't matter - I can change that. I've read bad things about the Sony, sure, but I've also read and experienced negatives about the Canon. I'd like the Canon to be the best since it's cheaper than the Sony.
I still don't see the point why someone wants more reach then 600mm in a bridge camera. 600mm equivalent is almost the same field of view as a Canon 7D with an 100-400mm L lens, probably the most used lens for birds and wildlife. I would pick a 300mm prime and maybe a 1.4 teleconverter but that's just me.
Did you even watch the video? He plainly says the Sony is the overall best of the three. I've read similar things from other sites. When I tried the Canon, I felt the UI was pretty bad, the shutter button was awkward to reach, and the photos weren't actually better. Also, better color is a non-issue - that's what Photoshop is for.
Everything you said about the Sony is true. I have used my Lumix FZ80 for a year and just got a HX400. On paper the Lumix has better specs. The Lumix gets some shots better than the Sony, But overall the Sony just works better.
you are right graham , the self timer is in a stupid place . the 240 fps is not worth using as the quality is not great , but i have used the 120 fps and its fine for general use. Not sure any camera in this price bracket will have full hd at 240 fps , is there such a camera at £ 280 quid ?
See? You're so much more pleasant to read when you don't have an ass-ish tone. I'll give the Sony a shot (I have already ordered it) and if it sucks, I'll return it and move, probably to the Canon (because I think we can both agree - the Nikon is terrible.)
The Hx300 is not an interchangeable lens camera and though you can find filters that do fit, and could get an adapter, it is not easily compatible with most filters. We suggest you take it into a store to see what works! We linked to a video of the HX300 being used with adapter rings in the info of our video as well.
I wouldn't have thought so. However, people reading this need to know that they ain't going to get HD at these high frame rates. I now TWIXTOR my SX50 output! G
me costo muchisimo decidir acerca de que camara comprar, ya que por lo que valen , no puedo darme el lugo de cambiarla si no me gusta... este video me ayudo bastante. al ver las comparaciones especataculares, opte por la canon sx50hs. y no arrepiento de nada, es exelente...
Hola amigo. Quisiera saber tu opinión. Ya que tengo la posibilidad de comprarme esta cámara, pero me entró la duda porque con un precio muy parecido al que tiene esta puedo conseguir la Nikon d3100 Reflex. Mi problema surge en que la Nikon trae apenas 14,2MP y la Sony (que es compacta) trae 20,4MP y mayor zoom. Que me aconsejarías vos?? Sería de gran ayuda la opinión de alguien que conozca ambas cámaras. Saludos.
hola Marianella estoy en el mismo problema ke tu,, en cuanto a la nikon 3100, la sony hx300 y la nikon coolpix p520 están al mismo precio aca en mexico y creo que de remate,, las diferencia entre la nikon 3100 con las demás es ke es réflex y menor alcance en comparación de las 42x y 50x de las demás, tiene menor pixelaje y una observación muy importante es de que si quisieras aumentar el lente para un mayor alcance pues tendrías que comprar otro lente cosa que te valdría saliendo casi igual al precio de tu cámara,, en comparación a la hx300 y la p520 no necesitas comprar mas lentes porque el super zoom ke te dan ambas es fenomenal (no le puedes adaptar otro lente en comparación a la nikon 3100) yo estoy entre comprar la nikon coolpix 520 con gps, 42x,18.1 mp y ke tiene retardo de enfoque o la sony dsc hx300 con 50x, 20 mp. tu decides, saludos desde mexico.
ok just a correction for you re the canon sx50 , you say only the nikon has slow mo . in fact the canon has TWO slow motion video modes. 120 fps and 240 fps
I am blessed to have handled all 3 bridge camera. I owned the Nikon and after monkey-ing the other 2, I would say that the Canon is better than the others. I just said better, not the best, I still prefer MF and FF SLRs. So I have sold the Nikon and bought the Canon for walk around camera.
so yeah i need a quick respond i dont know what camera to buy the sony or the canon i love to make photos of nature and also of the moon, wich one is the sharpest when fully zoomed in and which one is the most stabilized
+TOXICO KILLER Hi there, thanks for your question. For what you're doing I would pick the Sony HX300; it has higher resolution and it has longer exposure, which will help with night photography.
I got the Sony HX300, my first DSLR Camera :D Works fine and I love playing around with it but most of the time I film a blog with the camera facing me and uh kinda needing the full flip screen but overall works fine 9/10
11 лет назад
who has the more powerful zoom? including digital. Sony HX300 comes to 400x with digital
Flash of HX300 is good enough with 17.5m that I tested and it works perfectly. Now issue to got external flash in this situation. New Nikon P600 is also interesting but aperture is not good side of this one. But I must admit that all this cameras are not as good as Sony RX-1 with much better Lens and ISO control .
No issue. Probably Fuji HS50 EXR is better than this 3 that are mentioned ( bigger sensor, usable ISO 3200, better construction of lens 17 elements and better aperture and quality of films)
The Canon SX 50 has a separate battery charger, so the battery doesn't have to be charged "in camera". It also has much better image quality than the other two cameras reviewed.
I thought it was rather convenient how that was not even talked about. I'd love to know why the Sony was supposedly better. I'd also love to know what features he couldn't find as Canon's have about the most logical menu systems in the industry.
First I was confused which to buy nikon, canon or sony. But the nikon was out from the race when you told that the auto focus is slow and the lense vibrating is not a good sign. I choosed canon and i am fully satisfied.
the XS50 can be charged outside the cam in its outlet charger
Great share on this thanks
You can get the Sony camera with lens kit on sale now on digiht.com/SonyHX300camera for anyone looking for it
Yes ...that is the only thing that he got wrong. My CANON SX50hs has a separate charger that plugs into the wall.
Otherwise this guy has a great persona in front of thecamera. great job.
It's weird, he talked everything better with Canon, and the end the best is Sony?
Nice review, you convinced me not to buy the Nikon, but definitely didn't convinced me that the Sony is better than the Canon.
A few points to be noticed when comparing the Canon against the Sony:
The Canon is lighter and smaller;
It supports RAW file format;
It has a flash shoe for an external flash;
Actually, despite what you said, it does have a charger so you don't need to charge the batteries inside the camera;
It has a supersonic zoom speed, that is why you noticed it's zoom as the fastest;
It's display can do a FULL flip-out and is easier to see in outdoor conditions;
It shoots faster (13 fps against 10 fps from Sony);
It can record in slow motion (even 240 fps but not so good resolution).
But I recognize that the Sony has 12800 ISO against only 6400 from the Canon.
I'm not saying Canon is better, I'm only saying it has a lot of advantages over the Sony, so I don't understand how you came to the conclusion that the Sony is better in overall. I would like to understand why you said that because I'm doing a research and still don't know if I'll buy the Canon SX50 or the Sony HX300. I want a good camera to take pictures AND full hd videos.
did u make ur choice? i, too, am torn between the canon and sony. i see many reviews saying the canon is better, but doesnt the low megapixel effects it in any way?
Yaya Mahazir So did you buy Canon sx50? I am thinking to buy Canon sx50 but low megapixel may change my decision
I'm also confused between the duo... Sx 50 hs or hx400v
Ankit Jha i bought sony hx400v 2 days ago.. looks good.. exploring it more.
Two things: I know that the Canon will shoot in RAW and the Nikon will not, if you like to use software for adjusting your image. Also this review says the batteries are only chargeable within the camera itself. You can inexpensively purchase extra batteries and an external charger for the Canon from E-Bay or other outlets that will allow you to charge one while using another.
Nikon P520!
You are right! We apologize for the misinformation. The SX50 has a charger dock, which is a great feature!
I think Canon SX50 better because of external flash.
Great review, but I guess some facts need to be corrected: the Canon SX50 has an external battery charger, the battery cannot be charged by the camera.
Lame review..skips over the most important want in a camera: image quality.
not quite for everyone.
one singular reason why the hx300 falls behind the sx50hs is the use of 20 mp.
the more pixels you put, the more noise it creates.
there is an optimum limit of megapixels for a particular sized sensor, where it peaks it's performance. beyond it pic quality deteriorates.
20 mp is just a marketing gimmick & may help sometimes when creating very huge posters; but why would u use this camera for creating for that purpose????
Camera comparison
snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Sony-Cyber-Shot-DSC-HX300
snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX50-HS-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-P520
Please make a direct comparison between the new models Canon SX50HS, Nikon P600 & Sony DSC HX400V. I am really confused to choose between these cameras.
Sony HX300 is best camera. I have already Sony DSLR, Really good picture quality. 20 MP and Focusing at zero milimeter ist good feature. Electronic view finder quality is ok not like DSLR A67. No Raw picture format.
Never mind having 3 or 4 lenses , you need a wheelbarrow to carry them !!!!
Hi sorry for my English. Do you know.why on the hx300 the videos highest quality stop after 30 seconds even if i have an empty memory card 8g? On the screen you can read 21 minute of recording free but when i record it lasts only 30 seconds. Do you know why? On the other video qualities the videos last a bit more but always they don't correspond To the time put on the screen. Ciao
Great
Sony Camera is the best HX300 is a beast! making beautiful pictures very good quality and looks beautiful. I got one :D
The Canon SX50 is the best.
Yup even I got1 it's d best
In your opinion, maybe. I'll stick with facts. ☺
And the facts say, Canon SX50 HS takes the best photos. I have been a amuture photographer for the past 15 years. I only ever use two cameras, both Canon and one been the SX50.
I have the Nikon P520. Its a good camera but i was having problems when focusing on distant object. The visuals are great.
I have owned the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300/BC 20.4 MP Digital Camera with 50x Optical Zoom and 3-Inch Xtra Fine LCD (Black) for 3 years and I have won NUMEROUS Awards with it for my photography it is an Outstanding portrait camera , Mine dose have to be plugged into wall charger or computer to recharge but other then that ,I have no complaints except I need a new one and am scared to death others wont live up to my Sony, Yes I use other cameras I have Nikon 5200, Nikon 3100, Canon Rebel 5, and Canon ESO 80 D, I do fine art photography, portraits, Weddings and would not trade my Sony for anything, How can I have it refurbished .
FYI friend the Canon SX50 HSdoes not have to be charged 'in-camera'. I have had one for over a year now and I still get blown away using it! Bravo Canon!
Nikon always Sucks on Super Zoom compact cameras...
Canon the best
Dude! Nice Video Comparison, but you want to tone down the amount of blush (or rouge?) you are using on your cheeks. It made it very hard to focus on what you were saying with *that* much make-up on. Thanks! ; ^ D
i like to know whether hx300 support all types of 55mm filters (eg:vivitar,hoya etc - nd,uv,cpl) without any adapters?? please reply asap
thank u
My Friend,, You Talk so much, and don't make the comparison corretment. That you make wich one, need to make exactily the same thing wich other. It to Us compare not you. Tank's
Yo he probado la canon, la sony y también la lumix fz200, y he optado por la sony por tener mayores ventajas que las otras dos, antes tuve canon y me parecia muy buena en las imágenes, pero esta vez sony la ha superado con su interfaz de usuario su modo automático y la opcion de zoom manual... los colores en este modelo ya han sido mejorados... si van a escoger la mas completa elijan dsc-hx300 sin duda
This is a manipulated review, probably a paid one. Whe this guy was featuring p520 he was showing the camera in real action, but during reviewing sony and canon he just showed a premade picture. Just watch the review attentively, you will see that sony and canon camera were never in real action. What sucks about this guy is that he is telling a pure lie. When you keep your camera and move it on Lens of each camera vibrates, and it is universal as the lens tries to adjust the picture. I have canon I definitely feel the vibratration in my canon.
Brief but good comparison work here. Thanks! Helped more than most vids on YT to make my decision on a superzoom.
I did lots more research and ordered the Sony HX400 for $419 from 42nd St. Photo this week. Mine won't have GPS, but I don't need it. The Sony's Wi-Fi might be useful. I needed a microphone input that most superzooms lack. The Sony has a hotshoe that accepts their adjustable stereo mics (and has a mic out ability to send the signal to a mixer, etc. for processing.) The Sony seems to focus faster than the others, and the ability to manually focus is a plus.
thanks Andrew
i would love to see you do the same with the new HX400v and P600
I LOVE the Canon sx50!!
I have the sx50,great camera, you were wrong about all cameras batteries charge in camera, the sx50 has a charger and can be charged just by taking the battery out and putting it in the charger.
All comes down to image quality Andrew You can include all the bells and whistles you want..Gps Wifi..you name it but in the end the Canon's image quality blows the other two out of the water
I own the SX50 its a great camera, also to correct, the SX50 can charge out of the camera with the provided charging dock. great tube though.
enjoyed your video ..Have seen terrific videos made with the Canon .... The battery has been what has put me off as I do videos but I read in your comments that there is a battery charger ...???? big question here and VIP .I use Apple Mac and iMovie11 will the footage of this Canon be OK with this ....Not all Panasonic cams are
Camera comes with a battery charger.
Hi may I get some help. Which one of them the best to buy it. I am looking for one good for pictures and Video
I have FZ200, and I want to sell it to buy Canon SX50 with longer reach. The FZ200 is great but the image quality is not good, I only got a crisp photos at 1600 by 1200 pixels photo size.
The Canon SX50 is a really good camera. Just recently purchased it and went to a Halloween Party and took lots of pictures of all the quest with their costumes and the pictures came out great. Better than I expected. Highly recommend.
Good Day Sir,
Can you help me decide which of this 2 should i choose. Thanks in advance
www.photographyblog.com/reviews/olympus_sp_720uz_review/specifications/
or
www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_powershot_sx500_is_review/specifications/
I bought sony in early september and it kicks ass :) ( watch my videos) cheers. In reality canon looks like toy.
Hello I have the canon sx50hs it does not need to be charged in camera and has a separate charger, which is better for image quality pot wise with the megapixel difference thank you
He completely underrated the Nikon! I have it and its a lot cheaper than the Canon and has nearly the same specs. Check out my full review on my channel
I got the HX300 last Friday. The lack of instructions supplied is annoying. Everything I am learning bit by bit. But for the life of me, I can not find half of the Picture Effects, Miniature mode and all the HDR effects are not on my menu. All I can see is Part red, green, blue and yellow filters, Pop, Toy and SftH key in the Picture Effects menu. Nothing to access any other special effects that other people say are on the camera. This camera needs a proper manual. Anyone help?
Very interesting and well presented review.
Thanks, we also have FujiFilm HS50EXR
I just bought a Nikon camera so you're saying my Nikon camera is the worst :(
My SONY HX300 pics
flickr . com/photos/aisse_gaertner/
Too bad this guy was never in focus. :/
hey man, why don't you make this kind of videos anymore ? i liked the intro and the edit. a very nice and simple review
Nikon p520 has the sharpest lens go with that one for photos, the other two are better at video go with those for better focusing in video.
Andrew it's bad publicity to inform potential buyers of the canon SX50 to state that it's an on-board battery charge. It isn't as theARMORYchannel also pointed out. I have the SX30 model and both have external chargers provided in the package.
Should have mentioned I have both the 30 and 50 models.
I like the canon sx50 alot but the battery problem annoying me becouse i want to buy extra battery... so is their any other camera
have these features ( hight quality and resolution of pictures which if i crop the picture it will be still clear photo + great colours + fast stabilized zoom + face detection + viewfinder + mic indeed , I need camera for long term with less problems
can you help me??? :)
The canon sx50 comes with a battery charger and you can charge battery outside of camera. I should know I own the camera.
pictures of the Canon at 1200mm is not what i would call usable.
you cannot compare 50X zoom on a bridge to 50X zoom on binoculars. the 50X starts at wide angle while we as humans see things at roughly 45mm equiv. i recall.
And then there is the lack of dynamic range of image sensors compared to our eyes. it is very hard to see animals in the shadows with an evf.
Then there is resolution. your screen is just not as sharp as your vision.
Read my comments, idiot. I said I've used the Canon and wasn't impressed. IF the Sony ends up sucking, I'll return it just like I did the Canon. I've looked at comparison pics and have seen good and bad things in both. I just know I don't like the Canon, so I'm giving the HX300 a try. If you can't handle that, well, I'm sorry. This video wasn't the deciding factor on my choosing the Sony, but the comment I originally replied to did help me choose the HX300 over the HX200V.
And by "all" you mean "a few"? I admit, I haven't had the chance to use the Sony, but I have used the Canon, and wasn't impressed. I did mention two things he mentions in the video, but because I observed those things myself, not because he said it in the video. And again, color doesn't matter - I can change that. I've read bad things about the Sony, sure, but I've also read and experienced negatives about the Canon. I'd like the Canon to be the best since it's cheaper than the Sony.
I still don't see the point why someone wants more reach then 600mm in a bridge camera. 600mm equivalent is almost the same field of view as a Canon 7D with an 100-400mm L lens, probably the most used lens for birds and wildlife. I would pick a 300mm prime and maybe a 1.4 teleconverter but that's just me.
Did you even watch the video? He plainly says the Sony is the overall best of the three. I've read similar things from other sites. When I tried the Canon, I felt the UI was pretty bad, the shutter button was awkward to reach, and the photos weren't actually better. Also, better color is a non-issue - that's what Photoshop is for.
Everything you said about the Sony is true. I have used my Lumix FZ80 for a year and just got a HX400. On paper the Lumix has better specs. The Lumix gets some shots better than the Sony, But overall the Sony just works better.
you are right graham , the self timer is in a stupid place .
the 240 fps is not worth using as the quality is not great , but i have used the 120 fps and its fine for general use.
Not sure any camera in this price bracket will have full hd at 240 fps , is there such a camera at £ 280 quid ?
See? You're so much more pleasant to read when you don't have an ass-ish tone. I'll give the Sony a shot (I have already ordered it) and if it sucks, I'll return it and move, probably to the Canon (because I think we can both agree - the Nikon is terrible.)
The Hx300 is not an interchangeable lens camera and though you can find filters that do fit, and could get an adapter, it is not easily compatible with most filters. We suggest you take it into a store to see what works! We linked to a video of the HX300 being used with adapter rings in the info of our video as well.
The Canon Camera Does Not Have To Be Charged In Camera!
The Camera has its own Charger?
I wouldn't have thought so. However, people reading this need to know that they ain't going to get HD at these high frame rates.
I now TWIXTOR my SX50 output!
G
me costo muchisimo decidir acerca de que camara comprar, ya que por lo que valen , no puedo darme el lugo de cambiarla si no me gusta... este video me ayudo bastante. al ver las comparaciones especataculares, opte por la canon sx50hs. y no arrepiento de nada, es exelente...
Hola amigo. Quisiera saber tu opinión. Ya que tengo la posibilidad de comprarme esta cámara, pero me entró la duda porque con un precio muy parecido al que tiene esta puedo conseguir la Nikon d3100 Reflex. Mi problema surge en que la Nikon trae apenas 14,2MP y la Sony (que es compacta) trae 20,4MP y mayor zoom. Que me aconsejarías vos?? Sería de gran ayuda la opinión de alguien que conozca ambas cámaras. Saludos.
hola Marianella estoy en el mismo problema ke tu,, en cuanto a la nikon 3100, la sony hx300 y la nikon coolpix p520 están al mismo precio aca en mexico y creo que de remate,, las diferencia entre la nikon 3100 con las demás es ke es réflex y menor alcance en comparación de las 42x y 50x de las demás, tiene menor pixelaje y una observación muy importante es de que si quisieras aumentar el lente para un mayor alcance pues tendrías que comprar otro lente cosa que te valdría saliendo casi igual al precio de tu cámara,, en comparación a la hx300 y la p520 no necesitas comprar mas lentes porque el super zoom ke te dan ambas es fenomenal (no le puedes adaptar otro lente en comparación a la nikon 3100) yo estoy entre comprar la nikon coolpix 520 con gps, 42x,18.1 mp y ke tiene retardo de enfoque o la sony dsc hx300 con 50x, 20 mp. tu decides, saludos desde mexico.
ok just a correction for you re the canon sx50 , you say only the nikon has slow mo .
in fact the canon has TWO slow motion video modes.
120 fps and 240 fps
Nikon Coolpix P520 video tutorial needed
Thanks homie
Foto reali
Aporat sum shum i bukur.
28.01.2022
Superjor.
I wonder y he does'nt chose Canon SX50 HS , Moreover also didnt gave any gr8 reviews for Sony Cam, which he thinks as best.
Or.. just get a FZ-200. Constant f2.8 wins hand down.
why would someone look through these tiny viewfinders instead of a binocular. The screens are even harder to look at in the sun.
Good comparison but correction : Canon HS50 has a battery charger in the box (in UK) so can charge out of camera.
yes you right
your reviews were excellent but u should have a wiser cameraman to cover you and the cameras .....u know what I mean :)
Chargers are available for the SX50 KAMERA-AKKU-LADEGERAT-LADESTATION-fur-CANON-Powershot-SX50-HS-/ check Ebay Germany
Great review! Thank you very much!
which Camera took the picture of the dog in the water with a ball in it's mouth?
An effective review. My favorite is the Canon.
The Canon SX50's battery comes out of the camera and charges with a wall charger!...but nice review...otherwise!
you forgot to compare the prices ranges of the 3 cameras.... Nikon p520 is usually cheaper than the other 2....
Prefer the Canon image quality too. The Sony still has that WATERCOLOR texture about it which is disappointing.
Sony hx 300 will work for me here!
I would buycanon but it has 12mp while sony has 20 mp
Super camera demonstration VS test production! Great video creation congratulations too! Good day!
👍🍀🇭🇺🌞☝️
I am blessed to have handled all 3 bridge camera. I owned the Nikon and after monkey-ing the other 2, I would say that the Canon is better than the others. I just said better, not the best, I still prefer MF and FF SLRs. So I have sold the Nikon and bought the Canon for walk around camera.
After owning my SX50 for a number of years .I only just recently discovered that it is also a fine video camera as well .
so yeah i need a quick respond i dont know what camera to buy the sony or the canon i love to make photos of nature and also of the moon, wich one is the sharpest when fully zoomed in and which one is the most stabilized
+TOXICO KILLER Hi there, thanks for your question. For what you're doing I would pick the Sony HX300; it has higher resolution and it has longer exposure, which will help with night photography.
ok thanks now i know you got +1 sub
+TOXICO KILLER We're really glad to hear that!
what about nikon coolpix p520 ? anybody have it ? please help me and share your experience
I got the Sony HX300, my first DSLR Camera :D Works fine and I love playing around with it but most of the time I film a blog with the camera facing me and uh kinda needing the full flip screen but overall works fine 9/10
who has the more powerful zoom? including digital. Sony HX300 comes to 400x with digital
I charge camera using USB cigarette lighter adapter.
it seems sony has a better aperture f/2.8-f/6.5 than canon f/3.4-f/6.5.
The P520 has a f/stop of 3.0-8.4
I think Canon SX50 better because of external flash.
Sony has not?!!!
Flash of HX300 is good enough with 17.5m that I tested and it works perfectly. Now issue to got external flash in this situation. New Nikon P600 is also interesting but aperture is not good side of this one. But I must admit that all this cameras are not as good as Sony RX-1 with much better Lens and ISO control .
No issue. Probably Fuji HS50 EXR is better than this 3 that are mentioned ( bigger sensor, usable ISO 3200, better construction of lens 17 elements and better aperture and quality of films)
Talking about cameras the Nikon and Canon are the best
The Canon SX 50 has a separate battery charger, so the battery doesn't have to be charged "in camera". It also has much better image quality than the other two cameras reviewed.
And you heva canon :D
But SONY is better
I have both...
+jurijs jegermanis Why is it better? Back your statement or you're just a fanboy.
I thought it was rather convenient how that was not even talked about. I'd love to know why the Sony was supposedly better. I'd also love to know what features he couldn't find as Canon's have about the most logical menu systems in the industry.
SONY WINS FATALITY
nice to watch this vid and now i really get why i choose sony cam
First I was confused which to buy nikon, canon or sony. But the nikon was out from the race when you told that the auto focus is slow and the lense vibrating is not a good sign. I choosed canon and i am fully satisfied.
Her canon sx50 pics
flickr . com/photos/mxban4/
Her canon sx50 pics
flickr . com/photos/mxban4/
I know this is almost a year old, but could you do a follow up with the Panasonic and Fujifilm offerings in the price range?
i hear the canon dose not have a mic in put