Gaijin stop wrecking maps and disabling the opportunity to avoid just playing head-on channel battles would be a great start. I’ve played this game for 12 years and the maps today are woeful to what we used to have and enjoy.
@@antonisashitteragain6993 Just been on Mosdok. I can remember when you could climb the hills in the north and fight in the fields in the south. The matches were still fun and more challenging as you needed to think where the enemy would be instead of knowing they will be opposite end of the same corridor you’re on. We should complain more to Gaijin as they are changing the game fundamentally.
The new Greece map is terrible for being a straight-up head on only map If they got rid of the Grey rocks it would allow flexibility instead of a brain dead slugfest
I want them to put focus on WW2 again, the thing that initially got me into this game 10 years ago. Why can't we have WW2 SPH, why not proper artillery mode instead of using long range guns as glorified TDs... which is just stupid. I'm happy that we finally got the famous PzH2000 but I don't wanna brawl with it xD I wanna sit in the back and provide fire support from long range (super fun experience in Armored Warfare)
you dont want a proper artillery mode brother, please, think about it for like 1 minute. It would have even less counter than strike aircraft which are already hell. Artillery is torture in world of tanks and it will be way worse in war thunder
@kampfkeks0158 The problem with strike aircraft is a) the map design and b) low SP cost. Two things which could easily be fixed... Why less counter? Counter-battery would be a great mechanic for it. Again, taken from my experience in Armored Warfare. Enemy arty reveals their location when firing and you can counter them. At least some testing should be done before disagreeing about something new and possible exciting for many players.
@kampfkeks0158 planes can kill arty easily, or other arty can kill arty, it can be balanced good. Question is will gaijin do it normal, or like always?
@@DarlinaLTeshdepends on br, like on 5.7 grb is turning in arb, but on 12.0+ 1 spaa for 70 RP can easily kill 3 planes for 700+ RP, like if you take vehicle 10 times expensive it must be 10 times more effective, right?
@ЛевАрцишевський they dont balance planes, they dont balance tanks, they dont balance ships, they dont balance cas & AA but sure, they will balance arty
Regarding Discord DMs, the bigger your channel gets the less feasible it is to have open DMs. Closing them and having a sort of Q&A channel might be the best solution, but even that might become overwhelming when your channel grows even more.
The biggest change I'd like to see in 2025 is game modes, mainly for air. I'd like realistic ec or other game modes against pve stuff. I'd also like to see attack/defend game modes. Like protecting a convoy or something like that. For ground I'd love a wider range of missions but it would be a bit harder to add in and balance.
Talks about cas, then become cas. Lol. I just recently got into war thunder myself and I already hate being bombed. Been having a rough time shooting them down with aa. Fun game though.
For me I find enjoyment from playing different vehicles. Pretty much every vehicle I play gets some sort of new playstyle to it. That’s how at least I get over the gamemodes thing.
Repair cost creeping back to unbelievable levels . Cheaters less of them but they still exist. Equity Diversity with servers 😮 American Server is crippled with a everyday 2 frame lag now sometimes especially in air arcade assault 8 frame with Out right freezing in motion in first of match . Game is growing into a flawed mass of complications. By playing with basic game modes and manners that worked perfectly destroyed for the sake of what . 12 years of effort in a dieing under maintained nightmare . SAD
The problem with adding any sort of MMR or skilled based match maker to an unranked game mode is that it’s an extremely unpopular thing socially but for most games it helps player retention. Overall it would be hard for warthunder to have a MMR system when we have so many battle ratings and modes where you would be unlikely to get proper MMr matches most of the time.
@DawgIVLife im not saying that shuld be implemented like that, only like a lvl cap match for new players, like at max a lvl 20 at rank 3 tanks and then if you are more than lvl 20 you get other match pool Bc is not good to new players to stay in a game that the grind is insane and having to face lvl 100 players with premiums like the chi-ha shortbarrel at 2.0 that is a oneshot in like 95% of the tanks
@@El_crusoff420 there is a level 10 matchmaking the problem is level is a bad scale of skill, for example a level 100 could just have been playing for a long time etc .
While I get where your coming from it would royaly fuck the matchmaking time and your gonna get so many complaints from 100s moaning they can't club. I do agree there should be some king of cap but level based mm and skill based is never liked in games. As someone who went trough the grind at low brs and used to get clubbed all the time, just get better and learn from your mistakes and learn the maps. That's the advice I can give you, sometimes thing also just don't go your way in this game.
I never play above 8.3 so I definitely agree that a lot of updates are just dead for me, a bunch of new modern vehicles that I don't have any interest in playing. I was glad to get the M44 but we definitely need more early tier stuff.
Well...even I am very happy to get new tier3-4 vehicles, all last ones e.g. M44 and KV7 are implemented in ussual shity gaijin way...first of all BR is wrong; neither KV7 nor M44 should be 4.0. It seems 5.0 or above is more appropriate. Secondly, I noticed that tigers are easily killed by M44, but as always there is russian bias, so kv-1 and other russian heavy tanks are rarely one shoted or no damaged at all...tier3 for M44 is also not correct; I would put it on tier4. For no logical reason M44 in german tech tree, changed Sturer Emil to tier2 (stupid!).
Gijian screws War Thunder players when it comes to Premium vehicles. Premium vehicles only grind out the next tech tree tank. In World of Tanks you receive free XP in every game and you can use it towards the next tech tree tank or use it to unlock the next modification. In WT you have to spend gold for your research points, that's BS.
Wat Dude in WoT you barely get any Free XP, and you CAN'T grind ANYTHING with them other than via the little free xp you make. In WT you can grind _anything_ with your premiums. And the penalties really aren't that bad. You get to grind all the ranks below yours, +one above, and then it's 60%, 70%, 80%. Which is a f-k ton better than WoT.
@jessymeowlight5660 I play WoT on Xbox, PC WoT steals your money. Premium tanks have higher XP, Credit and free XP rewards. You don't get a lot of free XP but over time it helps when you are grinding higher tiers. Premium tanks are more for credit making. Both games have pro's and con's, a positive is having free XP help grind a tank. You also can buy premium tanks with Free XP.
@@jessymeowlight5660 Both games are complete trash. It's 10% skill and 90% RNG. Just went 2-8 in 10 games, all 8 losses were blowouts and the games were decided by the snail. Being 1 shot time after time and my team is magically bouncing off weak spots. The game is trash and decided by giganis bs mechanics
@@aoli7313 Good luck grinding 450k FXP in a month 🧍♂ (I come from WoT Console too, it's nothing but a scam. In War Thunder 80% of 10k is still 2k. Much better than WoT.) Edit: Looking at someone's game on RUclips- Panzerknacker Auto, 5.7k dmg, 4 kills, 10k XP, forr... 300 free xp. _wooow_
Iirc most people buy a premium in WOT for crew training because it requires using gold to use most of the Free RP that you grinded with the wot premium
16:15 i agree with evrything you said. 100 percent. I couldn't of said it better. Also top tier just all feels the same . Darts lazer range finders ans all the tanks basically feel thr same. Lower tier stuff all feel unique and u have to play around there strengths and weaknesses
15:30 "Updates don't matter to most people because they don't have new things to grind out. They just continue with what they are doing before." This basically sums up War Thunder experience. Would be lucky if we COULD grind what we were before if Gaijin hasn't injected new "block" vehicle, which is most likely a copy'paste, or changed the tech tree layout to make you further away from your goal. One thing we should've known over the years is that Gaijin is a company that makes money by making you frustrated and annoyed, then offer you "easy solutions", not by designing the game fun and enjoyable and you support them out of good will. Adding new game modes? New and Better Maps? Vehicle and CAS Balance? Fix BUGs? Why would Gaijin do that, just make the RP reward worse and the grind harder so players can only max out at most one tech tree so the community become more divided (which it already is), so they can gradually make the game less enjoyable for everyone without offending everyone at once. I'd expect on Dec.31 2025, that's bound to happen but Gaijin would make more money cuz they added more top tier stuff to grind and more top tier premiums.
I'm mainly a top tier player at this point (ground and air) and i'd be fine with gaijin adding more lower tier vehicles, but with the ideal caveat that gaijin reduce the RP requirements to unlock vehicles or put more vehicles into folders. The thing about more low tier vehicles is that it makes the grind longer for people who want to focus more on progressing through the trees than just playing the game rank by rank, and while some ppl may not agree with that style, the truth is that a lot (maybe most?) war thunder players don't play just for the fun of it, they play to progress to whatever tier they are the most interested in
If they don't fix the PVE Assault gamemode for air then I won't be surprised. It crashes on some people, including me. It's fine if you don't care but there are people who doesn't want to enter a match to die and die again in top tier to grind their planes like I did but I was forced to because CAS is RNG, early top tier CAS is RNG×10 +invisible missiles and I don't want to go bomb 24/7 with a fighter but it's the best method to farm
1:57 Sorry but every time i go down to lower tier ranks cas gets way more annoying than in high tier every time i play low tier i died to more planes than tanks. I get that the fnf missels sound scary but at least the aa can kill enemy planes at range. So i really dont get that argument.
Gaijin themselves has said the power of top tier CAS isn’t where they want it to be it’s very unbalanced. Most of the SPAA can be out ranged and with the new map feature of slaving targeting pods it’s even easier to take out SPAA
@@DawgIVLife yes top tier cas is strong no question but if you can deal with low tier cas then top tier is no problem. All im saying is players overhype top tier cas as if it is the hand of god. And everyone pretends like low tier cas is somhow ok.
I get killed 1,000 times more from the game not registering my shot properly then CAS. I used to hate CAS also but now I love it because I learned how to shoot down planes and fly them. I actually kind of get my jollies from revenge killing the plane that just got me.😂 It took me two to three years to get decent at shooting down aircraft and another couple years to learn how to bomb and another couple to learn how to dog fight but I'm still not that good at dog fighting which is why I "paid to win" with the A7M1.😉 I am however very good at shooting down aircraft from the ground. Just the other day I think people thought I was cheating because I dropped 8 or 9 planes at 6.3 or 6.7BR with the Leopard 40/70.😂 it was hilarious because the chat lit up questioning how I was dropping one after another so fast and to be honest it was probably my best game ever with one vehicle and it's only because the dumbasses kept flying right by me. It was one of those once in a lifetime games for me and I even almost dropped the nuke but ran out of time. Back in the day when CAS would start to piss me off I would just get a full German lineup of anti-airs and protect my team the whole game. I once dropped 11 Planes and one tank in a single battle with a lineup of only 5 AAs. What's funny is I've played tanks the most over these past 7ish years and it's still probably what I'm worse at😂
Everyone is saying balance or maps a specific feature/bug. I agree br decompression, tank rebalancing ( T20, kv-220 and other OP tanks), volumetric, APDS, solid shot. I think the easiest and smallest fix that would create the LARGEST impact. PvPvE. Give some of these matches AI targets. There are tanks that exist to break fortifications, Air targets, infantry ( lot of the rocket ruskies). So why are they stuck only fighting tanks? There are soo many tanks, some overpowered, arent even designed to fight tanks.... AT ALL. Why take a sturmtiger and fight tanks it was never expected to fight. Tank destroyers and heavy tanks. They exist to fight tanks. They hunt other players. You get the sturmtiger to hit hard bases or hit a mass of soft targets. More air targets give AA more to do other than either wait in spawn or hunt tanks they arent designed to hunt. Tanks like the ASU amd PT could get back to their era instead of being 1970s designs running around with ww2 designs. Tanks like the petard have a purpose instead of only being played as a joke. Even if you dumb it down to only PvE. Team play is not encouraged in my opinion. But adding the PvE element, you now have people looking at the same goal. Most matches of PvP end up with people looking to do well, rather than winning.-
I would've liked if you had said anything about naval, at least like "it's so trash I can not bring myself to play it" would have been enough, naval really needs changes, there are cruisers that can fight battleships due to Br, cruisers having less amount of guns which are also worse, worse armor and a little faster, having basically almost no advantages, even less range, not to talk of how bad maps are, I understand on the one hand how people are inpatient and want to go straight into fight but from the other perspective most of the naval maps are spawn, enemy spawn is right in range and sight so the majority of the game starts and ends at spawn for the larger ships... not to talk of how impossible it is to fly a plane at this br, you bight say at 7.0 ships you can get a much newer plane from 7.3 which is basically almost 100 years newer?, but I really wanna know how usefull a plane like F3D or Attacjer FB 1 or arado C3 really are, except the arado the majority will not even be able to get bombs/guns close to target, if you hover above any 7.0 battleship just look how many guns are listed, only one line is main guns and another the secondary that may be used in ship to ship combat only, everything else is AA. I swear some ships have 5 times better aa than airfields and I am not overestimating as some have legit sams
The #1 problem with naval is that you have very few ships people actually care about compared to aircraft and tanks. Not matter what gaijin does for game modes the mode it self is already designed to fail because warthunder follows the rule of add a shiny vehicle people keep playing.
It is quite frustrating to know how easy it would be for Gaijin to address top tier CAS at least temporary. All they have todo for now is to double the spawn cost or more. You shouldn't be able to spawn CAS after just getting 2 kills, it should be a reward for hard effort and getting sh*t done in a game. Of course not nuke levels of high, but definitely higher than it is now. Another temporary solution could be to also add missile diamonds to the AGM's, same as Air RB. So at least you know, that you got one coming. Nothing is more frustrating than getting killed by something that you literally have no counterplay to, especially on open maps. It would also make drone revenge killing less frustrating, because you would actually see the AGM coming if your tank doesn't have LWS. But we all know that Gaijin really just wants people to buy top tier planes, because they see how OP CAS is, so we get more of it, at top tier. Hence why they will most likely keep it the way it is and gut it later down the line eventually. When it comes to EC for high tier, its just, because top tier ARB right now is a mess. I enjoyed top tier, before they introduced ARH missiles. Ever since they added them, I am no longer going any higher than 12.7 in ARB and even then I am not safe. The current maps don't accommodate ARH missiles and EC maps would at least sort of counteract the problem, because its much more spread out. But then again, even here we would have a temporary solution, by simply reducing the player count to 10 or 8 from 16.
@@dettaskafanfunka It really isn't, I get couple kills I spawn SU-34, launch 6 KH-38's, before enemy SPAA can shoot me down. Its not as problematic with western CAS, but SU-34 is straight up broken.
@@dettaskafanfunka I am not arguing that it isn't easy or hard, I am just saying that in general CAS is for the most part BS atm. Yes Russia CAS is much, MUCH stronger than western CAS, still it doesn't change the fact that as whole CAS is frustrating to deal with non the less. Example of a recent situation I had. I was close to getting a nuke and destroyed a guy that had 2 kills. He spawned in CAS and su*cide bombed into me. There is literally nothing I can do about that, especially because it was a open map without any top down cover. The guy did basically nothing to spawn in CAS. He got 2 kills and maybe a cap. If the CAS costs were appropiate he wouldn't have been able todo that.
Gaijin needs to stop fucking up maps or at least give us more map bans so I can ban more of them, looking at you euro province and big pooland. Also gaijin saying that they need to add better AA for Cas is so tone deaf. It's not the fact cas is strong(which it is), but the fact that it's so easy to spawn in. One assist or cap should not let you spawn in a loaded plane with fnfs or at lower brs a plane with full payload. Make it harder to get at least if you make them so powerful and easy to use. Also don't get me started on drones......
Agree with top tier being cancer......both air and ground not sure how you fix it other than nerfing CAS and getting rid of 1 cap game modes in ground.....
Happy New Years hope you have had a good start to the year.
Gaijin stop wrecking maps and disabling the opportunity to avoid just playing head-on channel battles would be a great start. I’ve played this game for 12 years and the maps today are woeful to what we used to have and enjoy.
Yea it kinda sucks getting small Alaska for example when the map it self was fine in the full version
@ We used to be able to go across the river to the island and into the forest on the hill.
Nope you only Will have more and More CoD maps because zoomers dont have patience and dont have time to learn how to flank
@@antonisashitteragain6993 Just been on Mosdok. I can remember when you could climb the hills in the north and fight in the fields in the south. The matches were still fun and more challenging as you needed to think where the enemy would be instead of knowing they will be opposite end of the same corridor you’re on. We should complain more to Gaijin as they are changing the game fundamentally.
The new Greece map is terrible for being a straight-up head on only map
If they got rid of the Grey rocks it would allow flexibility instead of a brain dead slugfest
I want them to put focus on WW2 again, the thing that initially got me into this game 10 years ago.
Why can't we have WW2 SPH, why not proper artillery mode instead of using long range guns as glorified TDs... which is just stupid.
I'm happy that we finally got the famous PzH2000 but I don't wanna brawl with it xD I wanna sit in the back and provide fire support from long range (super fun experience in Armored Warfare)
you dont want a proper artillery mode brother, please, think about it for like 1 minute. It would have even less counter than strike aircraft which are already hell. Artillery is torture in world of tanks and it will be way worse in war thunder
@kampfkeks0158 The problem with strike aircraft is a) the map design and b) low SP cost. Two things which could easily be fixed...
Why less counter? Counter-battery would be a great mechanic for it. Again, taken from my experience in Armored Warfare. Enemy arty reveals their location when firing and you can counter them.
At least some testing should be done before disagreeing about something new and possible exciting for many players.
@kampfkeks0158 planes can kill arty easily, or other arty can kill arty, it can be balanced good. Question is will gaijin do it normal, or like always?
@@DarlinaLTeshdepends on br, like on 5.7 grb is turning in arb, but on 12.0+ 1 spaa for 70 RP can easily kill 3 planes for 700+ RP, like if you take vehicle 10 times expensive it must be 10 times more effective, right?
@ЛевАрцишевський they dont balance planes, they dont balance tanks, they dont balance ships, they dont balance cas & AA but sure, they will balance arty
Regarding Discord DMs, the bigger your channel gets the less feasible it is to have open DMs.
Closing them and having a sort of Q&A channel might be the best solution, but even that might become overwhelming when your channel grows even more.
The biggest change I'd like to see in 2025 is game modes, mainly for air. I'd like realistic ec or other game modes against pve stuff. I'd also like to see attack/defend game modes. Like protecting a convoy or something like that. For ground I'd love a wider range of missions but it would be a bit harder to add in and balance.
I love how survivable the boat is and how you can bait shots with the front
Make DMs something only Twitch/YT subs can do. Your advice is valuable, and you should treat it as such! Keep it up brotha.
What does war Thunder need to change? The Owners.
Talks about cas, then become cas. Lol. I just recently got into war thunder myself and I already hate being bombed. Been having a rough time shooting them down with aa. Fun game though.
2:40 bro, are u serious? I've been playing the game for a year now and am already tired of the same old game mode over and over and over
For me I find enjoyment from playing different vehicles. Pretty much every vehicle I play gets some sort of new playstyle to it. That’s how at least I get over the gamemodes thing.
Repair cost creeping back to unbelievable levels . Cheaters less of them but they still exist. Equity Diversity with servers 😮 American Server is crippled with a everyday 2 frame lag now sometimes especially in air arcade assault 8 frame with Out right freezing in motion in first of match . Game is growing into a flawed mass of complications. By playing with basic game modes and manners that worked perfectly destroyed for the sake of what . 12 years of effort in a dieing under maintained nightmare . SAD
They need to add a kind of mmr, i remember when i started i faced constantly lvl 100 players/squads between tier 2.0 to 4.0
The problem with adding any sort of MMR or skilled based match maker to an unranked game mode is that it’s an extremely unpopular thing socially but for most games it helps player retention. Overall it would be hard for warthunder to have a MMR system when we have so many battle ratings and modes where you would be unlikely to get proper MMr matches most of the time.
@DawgIVLife im not saying that shuld be implemented like that, only like a lvl cap match for new players, like at max a lvl 20 at rank 3 tanks and then if you are more than lvl 20 you get other match pool
Bc is not good to new players to stay in a game that the grind is insane and having to face lvl 100 players with premiums like the chi-ha shortbarrel at 2.0 that is a oneshot in like 95% of the tanks
@@El_crusoff420 there is a level 10 matchmaking the problem is level is a bad scale of skill, for example a level 100 could just have been playing for a long time etc .
While I get where your coming from it would royaly fuck the matchmaking time and your gonna get so many complaints from 100s moaning they can't club. I do agree there should be some king of cap but level based mm and skill based is never liked in games. As someone who went trough the grind at low brs and used to get clubbed all the time, just get better and learn from your mistakes and learn the maps. That's the advice I can give you, sometimes thing also just don't go your way in this game.
I never play above 8.3 so I definitely agree that a lot of updates are just dead for me, a bunch of new modern vehicles that I don't have any interest in playing. I was glad to get the M44 but we definitely need more early tier stuff.
Well...even I am very happy to get new tier3-4 vehicles, all last ones e.g. M44 and KV7 are implemented in ussual shity gaijin way...first of all BR is wrong; neither KV7 nor M44 should be 4.0. It seems 5.0 or above is more appropriate. Secondly, I noticed that tigers are easily killed by M44, but as always there is russian bias, so kv-1 and other russian heavy tanks are rarely one shoted or no damaged at all...tier3 for M44 is also not correct; I would put it on tier4. For no logical reason M44 in german tech tree, changed Sturer Emil to tier2 (stupid!).
We need a CAS free ground mode.
YES PLEASE!!!
100%
Gijian screws War Thunder players when it comes to Premium vehicles. Premium vehicles only grind out the next tech tree tank. In World of Tanks you receive free XP in every game and you can use it towards the next tech tree tank or use it to unlock the next modification.
In WT you have to spend gold for your research points, that's BS.
Wat
Dude in WoT you barely get any Free XP, and you CAN'T grind ANYTHING with them other than via the little free xp you make.
In WT you can grind _anything_ with your premiums. And the penalties really aren't that bad.
You get to grind all the ranks below yours, +one above, and then it's 60%, 70%, 80%. Which is a f-k ton better than WoT.
@jessymeowlight5660 I play WoT on Xbox, PC WoT steals your money. Premium tanks have higher XP, Credit and free XP rewards. You don't get a lot of free XP but over time it helps when you are grinding higher tiers. Premium tanks are more for credit making.
Both games have pro's and con's, a positive is having free XP help grind a tank. You also can buy premium tanks with Free XP.
@@jessymeowlight5660 Both games are complete trash. It's 10% skill and 90% RNG. Just went 2-8 in 10 games, all 8 losses were blowouts and the games were decided by the snail.
Being 1 shot time after time and my team is magically bouncing off weak spots. The game is trash and decided by giganis bs mechanics
@@aoli7313 Good luck grinding 450k FXP in a month 🧍♂
(I come from WoT Console too, it's nothing but a scam. In War Thunder 80% of 10k is still 2k. Much better than WoT.)
Edit: Looking at someone's game on RUclips- Panzerknacker Auto, 5.7k dmg, 4 kills, 10k XP, forr... 300 free xp. _wooow_
Iirc most people buy a premium in WOT for crew training because it requires using gold to use most of the Free RP that you grinded with the wot premium
16:15 i agree with evrything you said. 100 percent. I couldn't of said it better. Also top tier just all feels the same . Darts lazer range finders ans all the tanks basically feel thr same. Lower tier stuff all feel unique and u have to play around there strengths and weaknesses
The grind is obnoxious....still love the game somehow
15:30 "Updates don't matter to most people because they don't have new things to grind out. They just continue with what they are doing before."
This basically sums up War Thunder experience. Would be lucky if we COULD grind what we were before if Gaijin hasn't injected new "block" vehicle, which is most likely a copy'paste, or changed the tech tree layout to make you further away from your goal.
One thing we should've known over the years is that Gaijin is a company that makes money by making you frustrated and annoyed, then offer you "easy solutions", not by designing the game fun and enjoyable and you support them out of good will.
Adding new game modes? New and Better Maps? Vehicle and CAS Balance? Fix BUGs?
Why would Gaijin do that, just make the RP reward worse and the grind harder so players can only max out at most one tech tree so the community become more divided (which it already is), so they can gradually make the game less enjoyable for everyone without offending everyone at once. I'd expect on Dec.31 2025, that's bound to happen but Gaijin would make more money cuz they added more top tier stuff to grind and more top tier premiums.
I'm mainly a top tier player at this point (ground and air) and i'd be fine with gaijin adding more lower tier vehicles, but with the ideal caveat that gaijin reduce the RP requirements to unlock vehicles or put more vehicles into folders. The thing about more low tier vehicles is that it makes the grind longer for people who want to focus more on progressing through the trees than just playing the game rank by rank, and while some ppl may not agree with that style, the truth is that a lot (maybe most?) war thunder players don't play just for the fun of it, they play to progress to whatever tier they are the most interested in
How 'bout Low-tier tanks for germany like Hummel or Grille? i mean they really existed... and if m44 is in the game - why not those?
Exactly.. the Nashorn exists already and it's the same chassis
If they don't fix the PVE Assault gamemode for air then I won't be surprised. It crashes on some people, including me. It's fine if you don't care but there are people who doesn't want to enter a match to die and die again in top tier to grind their planes like I did but I was forced to because CAS is RNG, early top tier CAS is RNG×10 +invisible missiles and I don't want to go bomb 24/7 with a fighter but it's the best method to farm
1:57 Sorry but every time i go down to lower tier ranks cas gets way more annoying than in high tier every time i play low tier i died to more planes than tanks. I get that the fnf missels sound scary but at least the aa can kill enemy planes at range. So i really dont get that argument.
Gaijin themselves has said the power of top tier CAS isn’t where they want it to be it’s very unbalanced. Most of the SPAA can be out ranged and with the new map feature of slaving targeting pods it’s even easier to take out SPAA
@@DawgIVLife yes top tier cas is strong no question but if you can deal with low tier cas then top tier is no problem. All im saying is players overhype top tier cas as if it is the hand of god. And everyone pretends like low tier cas is somhow ok.
CAS at all levels is very bad, however top tier is the worst. There is no NATO SPAA that can counter the SU-34 right now
Honesyly, what they need to do is fix the grind!
I get killed 1,000 times more from the game not registering my shot properly then CAS. I used to hate CAS also but now I love it because I learned how to shoot down planes and fly them. I actually kind of get my jollies from revenge killing the plane that just got me.😂
It took me two to three years to get decent at shooting down aircraft and another couple years to learn how to bomb and another couple to learn how to dog fight but I'm still not that good at dog fighting which is why I "paid to win" with the A7M1.😉
I am however very good at shooting down aircraft from the ground. Just the other day I think people thought I was cheating because I dropped 8 or 9 planes at 6.3 or 6.7BR with the Leopard 40/70.😂
it was hilarious because the chat lit up questioning how I was dropping one after another so fast and to be honest it was probably my best game ever with one vehicle and it's only because the dumbasses kept flying right by me. It was one of those once in a lifetime games for me and I even almost dropped the nuke but ran out of time. Back in the day when CAS would start to piss me off I would just get a full German lineup of anti-airs and protect my team the whole game. I once dropped 11 Planes and one tank in a single battle with a lineup of only 5 AAs. What's funny is I've played tanks the most over these past 7ish years and it's still probably what I'm worse at😂
TANKS ONLY GAMEMODE
If planes can have it so do tanks, it would be an addition that should have been there all along
Everyone is saying balance or maps a specific feature/bug. I agree br decompression, tank rebalancing ( T20, kv-220 and other OP tanks), volumetric, APDS, solid shot. I think the easiest and smallest fix that would create the LARGEST impact. PvPvE. Give some of these matches AI targets. There are tanks that exist to break fortifications, Air targets, infantry ( lot of the rocket ruskies). So why are they stuck only fighting tanks? There are soo many tanks, some overpowered, arent even designed to fight tanks.... AT ALL. Why take a sturmtiger and fight tanks it was never expected to fight. Tank destroyers and heavy tanks. They exist to fight tanks. They hunt other players. You get the sturmtiger to hit hard bases or hit a mass of soft targets. More air targets give AA more to do other than either wait in spawn or hunt tanks they arent designed to hunt. Tanks like the ASU amd PT could get back to their era instead of being 1970s designs running around with ww2 designs. Tanks like the petard have a purpose instead of only being played as a joke. Even if you dumb it down to only PvE. Team play is not encouraged in my opinion. But adding the PvE element, you now have people looking at the same goal. Most matches of PvP end up with people looking to do well, rather than winning.-
I wanted that japanese landship but instead i got a random german truck with a gun 😅
I would've liked if you had said anything about naval, at least like "it's so trash I can not bring myself to play it" would have been enough, naval really needs changes, there are cruisers that can fight battleships due to Br, cruisers having less amount of guns which are also worse, worse armor and a little faster, having basically almost no advantages, even less range, not to talk of how bad maps are, I understand on the one hand how people are inpatient and want to go straight into fight but from the other perspective most of the naval maps are spawn, enemy spawn is right in range and sight so the majority of the game starts and ends at spawn for the larger ships... not to talk of how impossible it is to fly a plane at this br, you bight say at 7.0 ships you can get a much newer plane from 7.3 which is basically almost 100 years newer?, but I really wanna know how usefull a plane like F3D or Attacjer FB 1 or arado C3 really are, except the arado the majority will not even be able to get bombs/guns close to target, if you hover above any 7.0 battleship just look how many guns are listed, only one line is main guns and another the secondary that may be used in ship to ship combat only, everything else is AA. I swear some ships have 5 times better aa than airfields and I am not overestimating as some have legit sams
The #1 problem with naval is that you have very few ships people actually care about compared to aircraft and tanks. Not matter what gaijin does for game modes the mode it self is already designed to fail because warthunder follows the rule of add a shiny vehicle people keep playing.
It is quite frustrating to know how easy it would be for Gaijin to address top tier CAS at least temporary. All they have todo for now is to double the spawn cost or more. You shouldn't be able to spawn CAS after just getting 2 kills, it should be a reward for hard effort and getting sh*t done in a game. Of course not nuke levels of high, but definitely higher than it is now. Another temporary solution could be to also add missile diamonds to the AGM's, same as Air RB. So at least you know, that you got one coming. Nothing is more frustrating than getting killed by something that you literally have no counterplay to, especially on open maps. It would also make drone revenge killing less frustrating, because you would actually see the AGM coming if your tank doesn't have LWS.
But we all know that Gaijin really just wants people to buy top tier planes, because they see how OP CAS is, so we get more of it, at top tier. Hence why they will most likely keep it the way it is and gut it later down the line eventually.
When it comes to EC for high tier, its just, because top tier ARB right now is a mess. I enjoyed top tier, before they introduced ARH missiles. Ever since they added them, I am no longer going any higher than 12.7 in ARB and even then I am not safe. The current maps don't accommodate ARH missiles and EC maps would at least sort of counteract the problem, because its much more spread out. But then again, even here we would have a temporary solution, by simply reducing the player count to 10 or 8 from 16.
naaah. it can be hard to get a cas plane in top tier as it is. and when you get it SPAA is contantly shoting at you from the sec you spawn.
@@dettaskafanfunka It really isn't, I get couple kills I spawn SU-34, launch 6 KH-38's, before enemy SPAA can shoot me down. Its not as problematic with western CAS, but SU-34 is straight up broken.
@ try to do it with any other nation facing pantsir its alot harder
@@dettaskafanfunka I am not arguing that it isn't easy or hard, I am just saying that in general CAS is for the most part BS atm. Yes Russia CAS is much, MUCH stronger than western CAS, still it doesn't change the fact that as whole CAS is frustrating to deal with non the less.
Example of a recent situation I had. I was close to getting a nuke and destroyed a guy that had 2 kills. He spawned in CAS and su*cide bombed into me. There is literally nothing I can do about that, especially because it was a open map without any top down cover. The guy did basically nothing to spawn in CAS. He got 2 kills and maybe a cap. If the CAS costs were appropiate he wouldn't have been able todo that.
Gaijin needs to stop fucking up maps or at least give us more map bans so I can ban more of them, looking at you euro province and big pooland. Also gaijin saying that they need to add better AA for Cas is so tone deaf. It's not the fact cas is strong(which it is), but the fact that it's so easy to spawn in. One assist or cap should not let you spawn in a loaded plane with fnfs or at lower brs a plane with full payload. Make it harder to get at least if you make them so powerful and easy to use. Also don't get me started on drones......
New game modes
Agree with top tier being cancer......both air and ground not sure how you fix it other than nerfing CAS and getting rid of 1 cap game modes in ground.....
Increasing SP requirements is the first step.
@@DawgIVLifepantsir point and click with the faster missile speed, with J band in a all clouds map at 70sp seems balances to me :)
@ but it’s not even gaijin themselves have said top tier CAs is busted even with the pantsir in the game
Its devs and publisher
First
I received the Toldi! A POS rank who cares ans I'll never play. This season pass was trash ans we should all get our GOLD back.
Pls stop playing the ka chi If you are level 100
Yea it is pretty funny ngl and I can’t enjoy my ka chi I unlocked in this season battle pass?
@@TechandGamerContentWatcher What bomber
@@TechandGamerContentWatcher Huh
nO