My new Holy Trinity for the incoming A7iv: Sony GM 16-35, Tamron 35-150, and Sigma 150-600 😁. One of each brand, and a 37.5x zoom range (56.25 if you include apsc crop 😎)
Hands-down my favorite lens of all time, with the Sony 50mm f/1.2 GM being my second closest favorite. Btw, I put only a small piece of gaffer tape over the USB port, lol. I used the Tamron at a tree lighting event over the weekend and it was so freeing being able to get a 35mm crowd shot and a 150mm tree-top star and fireworks shot all within a couple of seconds, and all while wet snow was falling! I would've never been able to get that variety of shots before without missing some moment happening. I call it The Freedom Lens. :)
It’s in a different class altogether, but I love the 28-200 Tamron. I see the appeal of not changing lenses… I’m just glad there are many options for each use case!
Although I am not anywhere closer to making a decision between the Tamron 35-150 F2-2.8, Sony 70-200 F2.8 GMII or getting more primes - like GM 50 F1.2 and Samyang/Sony 135 F1.8 - I have to say that I absolutely enjoyed watching this review and your way of narrating is spectacular. This is the first video I have seen on this channel and I will certainly check out more. Thanks for the very informative and detailed review!
Just came back from a holiday family trip shooting on the lens for 5 days. If you don’t have a ton of lens already and you can bear with the weight it’s a no brainer. And it’s not even that heavy in hand.
For me I went for the 70-200 gm v2…..I enjoy landscape and low light work,so for me a lens of this weight needed a tripod collar,it’s a lot of weight hanging off the mount,and image stabilisation is always handy to have.It was a tough choice however…..the Tamron is a marvel of a lens by the sound of it.👍🏻👍🏻
Tried the lens on a presentation this weekend on my Z8. Maybe a good allround lens, but I was disappointed about the stug zoomring and the poor fitting on my camera. There was a small rotational movement when I zommed in and out. I'm going to pass on this one. Verry disappointed because I had high hopes about this one.
Yeah. My favourite lens is a 35mm 1.4, 35mm so versatile FL och 1.4 makes for composing e.g. environmental portraits with interesting surroundings (actual context) and good looking background separation. Then 'downgrading' to 2.8 is not an option really, but 2.0 could pass.... and add so many more options for framing the shot...
Got this lens a couple of weeks ago and it is the best zoom I've had in a 35-year product-lifestyle photo career. It's big, heavy, and well, just stunning. Combined with something like the new Sony 16-35 f/4 PZ plus a 100-ish macro and 97% of my workflow is covered. (And we won't mention all the other lenses kicking around my office...) As always, thanks for a great and thoughtful review.
I can imagine this lens has a whole bunch of manufactures pulling their hair out right now & Tamron / Sony are laughing all the way to the bank & It literally put the brakes on me Switching back to Canon from Sony. I picked one up and it’s probably one of the best lenses I’ve ever owned
This is my 4th time watching this video, it's that good. I love how you have a discussion about other potential lens setups instead of just listing off specs like other reviewers. I'm selling my A7III and 24-70mm DG DN to fund a new body and lens. I was initially going to default to the new hotness (A7IV + 35-150mm F2-2.8), but this review got my gears turning. You got me thinking about cropping with primes on an A7RIV. It's very tempting because I only do photography and the A7RIV can be found for the same price as the A7IV right now. A 24mm f1.4 GM (36mm f2.1 in crop mode) and 50mm f1.2 GM (75mm f1.8 in crop mode) would basically give me the same range as my 24-70mm but with more sharpness, light gathering, and shallower depth of field. My primary concern is the A7RIV itself, I have read that the autofocus is actually a downgrade from my A7III and the need to use higher SS to achieve critical sharpness is concerning. I can work around these shortcomings but it certainly means I'll get less keepers.
Another great review, thanks. I've had this lens since it was released. I love it. I keep my photography simple because 75% is hiking in the woods, or near a lake or anywhere my legs will take me and this lens is perfect to capture whatever catches my attention. I used to carry 2 lenses (24-70 and 70-180) and now I carry one. For me it was that simple.
@@zbieraj It's heavy but not overly burdensome in my opinion. I have a good shoulder strap and that helps. Most of my hikes are 2-3 hours. I can see though if someone is on an all day hike the weight might be an issue. I love the versatility and picture quality. I suggest renting one or find one in a camera store so you can get a idea of the weight.
I’m keeping the Tamron 17-28, a 50mm 1.4 and the 35-150 coupled with the A7iv Keller combo. And the 35-150 in super 35 giving around 15MP if you need that extra throw for events. You can also use it in the studio
I’ll be running a triple Tamron setup of the 17-28 f2.8, 35-150 f2-2.8, and 150-500. I used to run the setup, but with a 28-75 f2.8 instead. I’m going to see how this one does for me though; especially when I’m not shooting wildlife (leave the 150-500 home), when that extra reach of the 150 can come in handy.
Awesome review! Love your inputs! I actually have the same setup.. Sony 20mm 1.8 for gimbal work and 35-150 for fixed/stationary video. For photo work, 35-150 as the general lens and a nice prime like the 50 1.2 for it's bokeh. That's 3 lenses for both photo and video work! I have reduced my lens loadout from a carry-on roller to a small backpack. It has been phenomenal knowing you've got the ranges covered in such as small package. Another thought.. out with the old lens trinity (16-35, 24-70-70-200), in with the new trinity (16-35, 35-150,100-400) lol
It's exciting that such fast glass can be made on a zoom. I would love something stripped down for the APSC world, something fast with maybe 24-240mm f/2.8-f/4 built to a similar size.
Hugh, another excellent informative review. And FYI, rubber USB-C covers are available everywhere for cheap. Now if only Tamron would start making L Mount lenses [heavy sigh]...
This IS the lens for me and my main docu uses. The right focal length range, the right fast aperture. One lens, no changes. I was reminded of this last time I tried to change a lens in stair-rod rain - not good. I’ve tried and failed with both of the DSLR variations of the previous 35-150, Nikon and Canon. Lovely lens, couldn’t make the AF work reliably on either. So that takes me back to Sony after previously having been clear that our relationship was over. To an A9, to be precise. Please: let this be my documentary last port of call. My Leicas are still for the joy of photography, my Canons are still for sport. But for docu: Sony A9, battery grip, Tamron 35-150 1:2-2.8, Sony Zeiss 55mm 1:1.8 in my coat pocket.
Note there are smartphones with open USB-C ports designed for protection against full submersion. It is of little issue for Tamron to have the same level of protection for the USB-C ports on the 28-75 G2 or 35-150 VXD. Then there's the ability to change the MF behavior from by-wire to a programmed linear rack of the user's preference. Snap. Smart lenses are pretty.
Ordered this in November for the 7R3 and indoor sports, still on backorder as the seasons ended. Will also use it on a R4 or A1 not sure which one I'll get next.
I finally pulled the trigger and ordered this lens I plan on mostly using this lens by itself, and storing (i don't think i'm selling) my Tamron 24mm 2.8, Samyang 35mm 1.4, and Sony 85mm 1.8. Next I want to up/downgrade from my Godox AD400 Pro to the AD300 Pro and save space and weight there. Now I gotta get a new camera bag since mine is old and falling apart now. Just need enough room my Sony a7 iii + Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8, AD300 Pro and my 11" iPad Pro.
The sharpness of this video in 4k is so overwhelming to almost ridiculous, never thought a7s + this Tamron can offer such a result, of course the lighting is also perfect, great quality. Do you have a street photography/photography course available online? i would be happy to pay for it. thank you.
This is exactly my dream lens. Now to get a job that'll let me afford it - and hopefully it'll be out for Nikon Z by then (haven't switched yet, but intend to).
For what I do on digital, it’s almost like Tamron made this lens especially for me. I had the earlier 2.8-4 version for Canon and it was ideal, though there were AF issues. But with this on the front of my A9, I might even have to put my beloved Canon system into hibernation. A fast 35-150: it’s perfection.
The exposed USB-C port is a NON-issue. Easiest fix there is, just order some USB-C plugs/caps on Amazon or eBay. One day I'll save enough to get this Tamron. I currently shoot with a Sony a7 iii, 85mm 1.8 , 35mm 1.4, and 20mm 2.8.
This is a dream for indoor sports and events. It would also make my life much easier shooting weddings...but I'll never NEVER replace my primes for wedding day. Id fight someone over my 56 1.2 lol even though it's finicky the character, color, fall off, is just my favorite
Ended up selling Sony 35mm f1.8, Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, and Tamron 70-180mm f2.8 to fund this lens. Family Portraits/Weddings; I have a A7RIII with this 35-150mm f2.8, and an A7III with no lens yet, considering Tamron 17-28mm f2.8, Sigma 14-24mm f2.8, or Viltrox/Samyang 24mm f1.8 options. Second shooter with A7c and Rokinon 18mm f2.8 and Sony 85mm f1.8. Excited to finish off the season with these.
Tamron makes great lenses, I know that they acquired Bronica back around 2005. Some speculate that Tamron manufacturered the lenses for Bronica during the 1980’s and 1990’s.
I can guess how spectacular is this lens, first because I trust your experience and second because I am a long time Tamron user. My word, if I had to pick one, about this lens would be also “exceptional”, judging from my experience using Tamron lenses. Though I can’t (sadly) buy the 35-150mm since I am using DSLR, I would like to share some general thoughts on the brand. 1) there’s no competition to Tamron for a given price, on any segment. Sure, you can find way better lenses from Canon, Nikon, Sony or Zeiss but you gonna pay for them… much more money. Just consider this: every Tamron today (from 269€ onwards) has weather sealing and comes with a lens hood. Spending some extra money you also have premium build quality, fluorine coatings, internal focusing, ultrasonic focusing, real focus ring and class leading IS… my 70-210mm f4 is the perfect example. And pay an extra you can have a beast of a lens like 70-200 f2.8 G2… for about half the price of Canon or Nikon equivalent. So the prices are right. 2) the balance between sharpness and character. That also really awesome given the price! Tamron lenses (the more expensive anyway) are sharp! Period. But not “industrially” sharp the Sigma way… let’s say creamy sharp, with nice transition to the out of focus areas. I find them sharp across the frame but I am using APSC camera, I can’t judge the very edges for sharpness. And 3) the most important aspect for me is the color rendition. To my eyes, my Canon camera works the best on Tamrons, not so much on Canon lenses because the later tend to oversaturate the image a lot. I suspect the coatings are different here, but what I can say, my raw images are a tiny bit warmer and more neutral looking on Adobe Standard profile on Tamron, while Canon has a tendency to the cold tones and more saturated reds. Ok, color is strongly subjective matter but for me is important. Thanks for reading! And nice review Hugh!
Sigma's 35 1.2, 85 1.4, 105 1.4, 135. 1.8 or GM equivalent would be the only option to replace the Tamron 35-150mm and that combo of primes would be in the $7k to 9k dollars.
Hey, didn't mind the bird 🙂, sounds wonderful. Some 8 months after you recorded this..Such a great video and so much information on various angles of choosing the right lens. This is my first real zoom lens. I don't remember being so happy for a gear acquisition since I got me my A7III in 2018. The Tamron is heavy as hell but I'm working out, so it's a challenge. Jokes aside, it's so sturdy and smooth in operation, fantastic images and AF. Very front heavy and I really needed to tighten up the tripod. So my main use is going to be for photography and it's usually live music or events in general. Portraiture of course, and video when needed. Since this also was the most expensive lens I've ever bought, I'm faking the 25mm focal length by using the Sigma 16mm f1.4 for APS-C, then my A7III goes automatically to crop mode, and there I am in some 22mm full frame, right? And I love that Sigma, with smart framing I can get wonderful images. Still, Tamron needs to up their game when it comes to user manuals and tutorials. It's so difficult to find on their website and it seems they're directly turned to pros, and not beginner/intermediate. I tried to find information on configuring the option buttons 1-3 as well as smart buttons but it's a drag. Hoping some mercyful soul will make an instructional video about it all. I'm not nagging, only think that a prime price taken obligates for a more user friendly and inviting attitude.
The only competitor to this lens that I am currently considering is the new Sony 70-200 f2.8 GM II because I tend to be in that focus length 90% of the time.
A rubber cover on the usb-c could make it less water resistant … with an open port, they can seal it and basically make it water proof (not only water resistant) - with a cap, the moisture could build up and ruin it easily .., there’s a reason why smartphones doesn’t have a cap on the port even with IP67 etc …
I can see the appeal of this lens, but I really having wide as an option without changing lenses for my main zoom so I am stuck with a 24-70 F2.8. I also have a 24-240mm that I love for flexibility... and it got me thinking... why do we make lenses like that as extended kit zooms but not anything that is "pro" grade. I would love a 24-200 that is F2.8-F4 that has an 82mm filter thread that costs $2.2K-$2.5K and is actually good optically. I think a lot of people would find a lens like that compelling.
Hi Hugh, Until recently, my only lens was Tamron's 70-180mm attached to my Sony FX3 which I always kept mounted on a DJI Ronin RS 2. After buying this lens, I mothballed the 70-180mm and now I exclusively use the 35-150mm on the FX3 and Ronin RS 2. Since I don't manually focus, I repurposed DJI's focus motor to control zoom via the Tethered Control Handle while filming primarily in briefcase mode. I haven't had any issues with this setup, and so I was just curious why you caveated your recommendation with, "as long as we're not talking gimbal work"? Thanks!
It’s a very front-heavy set-up that doesn’t work well for Claudia (I don’t imagine it would work well for me, either); it would put too much stress on the Weebill S class gimbal that we favor - that is, a gimbal perfectly adequate when used with, say a 35 prime; and it would put too much stress, I fear, on the lens mount itself unless used with a lens support. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to articulate the specific set of considerations which led me to say what I did!
With a voice like that you should do ASMR videos 😃 But to comment on the topic of the video, this lens looks like a fantastic lens! Really hope I have a chance to try it sometime 😊
The birds also want to add to this wonderful review! I love hearing you talking so appasionately about a good lens. I wonder... Would you ever make a "disappointing lenses" video that never met the specifications you expected?
Dear sir, Thank you for your video. I just discover that lens and it seems that you are the right person to ask for those questions with, I promise, short, backstory. I am an ex-Nikon user, who switched to M43 system 2 years ago. Reason: I wanted to have smaller and lighter gear to take with me everywhere - mostly shooting just the pictures to have them as memories of places or to take pictures of my family and friends. Rarely also architecture, landscape and street. However, due to the sensor size, I ended up with a lot of 1.4 lenses (17mm, 25mm, 56mm) plus one UWA, but also a zoom 14-40 f/2.8. In the beginning it seemed fine that I had like 1-2 lenses and that I change them rarely. I started to shoot much more pictures than ever before. But then, I started to get more MFT prime lenses, because sometimes I needed different focal lengths. Now I am doing much less photos because I am stressed that every 5 minutes I will need to switch them, which is just annoying... The thing is that now my bag actually weights 414g (E-M5 Mark III body with battery) and 1.040g of just the lenses... I found out that even the cheapest A7C (I need that 5-IBIS) plus Tamron 35-150 weights around 100g more than that. It seems that coming back to FF and having this lens could mean that I would have only one lens mounted for ever and that's it. Here come my questions: 1. Would you recommend this lens (and purchasing any entry-level mirrorless camera from sony), get back to FF, for my case? 2. If I woul still use a waist-bag for my camera (so my back is not affected with the camera), would you consider that once in a while longer walk on the beaches of the Northern Sea (Denmark here) would be fine regarding comfort of taking it for a longer walks? 3. How do you handle having it in your hand for 10+ more minutes? Does your hand hurts, or is it heavy, but not enough to create health issues in the wrists? Sincerely, Zbieraj
The short answer: I’d suggest Tamron’s 28-75/2.8 G2 as a better choice given your concerns, perhaps with a high resolution a7 R IV to give you some additional reach.
@@3BMEP Thank you for your response and your time to write it :). I appreciate it. And sorry for the weird way I wrote the comment, it was after midnight in DK and I was too tired. Regarding your response, I was wondering then about two other things: - The reason why I use Sigma 56mm f/1.4 for MFT is that I have that 112mm reach. Which sometimes still feels like it is not large enough. Just 3 days ago I wanted to take pictures of my daughter iceskating, but then I realized that even with this FF 112mm, she was still pretty far away. Therefore I think that for Tamron 28-75/2.8 G2 I would need additional 75mm+ lens. That brings back two problems: heavy bag, even heavier than the current setup I have and the fact that I still need to switch lenses. What I also don't like about my current MFT system is that I can not go under F/1.4 AF (in MFT setup), without spending a lot of money on bulky and heavy OLY F/1.2. What is tempting with this Tamron is that on every focal length of that Tamron I can go with shallower DOF than on any OLY PRO F/1.2. - The a7 R IV weights 665g with batteries (comparing to 509g from A7C). Tamron 28-75/2.8 G2 weights 539g, giving together 1.204g. A7C + Tamron 35-150mm weight all together 1.674g. Yes, heavier by 450g for the hand, but the bag would be lighter due to the additional need for some telephoto range then. - One extra thing: A7R IV price is way over my budget for the body. Yes, I like to have UWA/WA lens for those specific cases of landscape/architecture/night sky photography and sometimes for (other) YT channel. But I think that I could have here one lens from range of 12-24mm, which could be even f/4.0 (maybe cheap prime). But in recent years I really switched to use the range of 35mm-112mm (unfortunately not more than those 112mm). This is why I am stuck regarding the decision what to do. The range of that Tamron is exactly the range I need from 95-99% of all the pictures I am taking. But again, I just wonder about the weight, especially on the longer trips. I wonder if I can hold it in my hand for like 10-15 minutes, while walking in the landscape before I will put it back to my waist bag. I don't want to have the stripe for puting the camera on my neck (I like the wrist ones though and actually on my Oly right now I use the finger one). Eh, I don't know that to do. I would buy this Tamron 35-150mm lens anytime now, but the weight... I know that trying to hold 1,5kg potato bag is not the same as holding a camera with the lens :D, but maybe I should make such test for my wrist... Sincerely, Zbieraj
@@zbieraj Stay with your micro-four-thirds (MFT) system. The Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD lens is a boat anchor. It weighs a whopping 41.1 oz (2.57 lbs)/1165 g and has a front element of 82 mm. That's a large piece of glass. You asked whether you could hand hold that lens for 10 minutes! Unless you're built like King Kong, you'd be doing well to hold that lens steady for 30 seconds, let alone 10 minutes. This is what I recommend for your MFT system: 1) Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III: 14.6 oz / 414 g 2) Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 12-35mm f/2.8 II ASPH. POWER O.I.S. Lens: 10.8 oz / 305 g (Alternatively,: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO: 13.47 oz / 382 g) 3) Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 35-100mm f/2.8 II POWER O.I.S. Lens: 12.59 oz / 357 g Total weight = 1076g/2.37 pounds
@@chesslover8829 I switched last winter. My A7C + Tamron 35-150mm weights 1,5kg, whereas my MFT gear, that I always had to have with me, had 1,6kg. The problem with your setup is that it is f/2.8, with DOF level of f/5.8 of FF eq. With A7C + 35-150 I was able to take more pictures than before, due to fact that I did not need to change any lens, since I have one 24/7 and also due to the fact that I could shoot in many occasions with much stronger DoF. My height is 186cm, I have overweight, I do not attend to gym, I have asthma and I can hold that camera for hours in idle position (camera turned towards ground). I was able to comfortably hike in Norwegian fjords last summer. No issues. When shooting - no-one shoots hand-held photos beyond 0.5s on FF, so this is is also not a problem. I actually think that switching to that Tamron 35-150mm was one of the most important photo-gear decision I made in my entire life and I think it was the best one.
Fantastic Review Hugh!! I have been waiting for your take. Awesome. Love this lens. I’m looking to pair it with the incoming A74. I guess we will see in January.
I'm about to get either the Sony a7c or the a74 and you have made me think harder about what lense(s) I want. Well done. Love your insights and eloquence. Subbed.
Excellent Review. I have a question regarding the Strap you mentioned. I don't mind carrying the weight all day if I can simply leave the body and the lens combination hung from a solid strap when I am not using. Where I am concerned is that if it will create pressure over the Lens mount and cause any mechanical damage. As a result, most of the times if I have to support the lens with one hand even when I am not using will be a problem (While I am travelling) Can you advice in this regard please? Many Thanks!
Good point! I'd be less concerned about carry as I've described it than having the camera parked on a tripod (like we do in the bat cave). An optional tripod collar would allay that particular fear.
I’ve found significant differences in image quality from one Sony 24-105/4 to the next among less than half a dozen samples over as many years, so I can’t really tell you. But if someone were to offer me the choice as a gift, I’d take the Tamron.
In college, in a galaxy far far away, my photojournalism professor (and mentor) use to lecture me the way you craft your reviews. Me, meaning as a photojournalism major I was the only dedicated major in the photography classes in the school of journalism at that time. He sounded a like you. Giving guidance, solid advice, and sharing his intuitive projections about prolific photographic advancements. I always seemed to extract the essence of his extended remarks before falling into a mental narcoleptic trance (I was young back then). I'm a prime lens guy too. I almost gave myself the Christmas gift of the latest Sony 35mm GM lens. I've seen all the other RUclips videos on this Tamron lens. Yeah, I'll add a few extra bucks and get this lens for it's focal versatility. The bad part is it seems there is no place in the US that this lens can be purchased. Everyone says "oh we have no idea when a shipment will be allocated to us". I'll get the lens partly because I have a healthy respect for your opinions on different photographic topics. Mainly, because in some of your videos I hear that college photojournalism professor keeping me awake long enough to hear the wisdom. Thanks.
@@3BMEP Totally understand. When you’re ready to sell, how much are you thinking of selling for? If I saw pics and knew the shutter count, I may be willing to buy from you. Great review by the way! My Tamron is on it’s way now!
Hugh, first off I have to say that I would kill to be able to have you as part of my inner circle of friends, I just adore you! And, no, I would not actually kill, but I would, I don't know... swim the English Channel in a bathing suit in January.... whatever. I am quite new to photography and I am growing into it. I do wildlife, landscapes, street (I live in Seattle so I have everything around me). I used to shoot an A7iii and loved it and then I was talked into getting the A9 because I do like to get BIF, but I am not loving it and I'm only getting 20% keepers. I appreciate the speed but the AF is crazy complicated to get right and I think I made a mistake getting it because the learning process has just discouraged me from getting out to shoot. I have the 7iv in order... but I can't help thinking I might be making a big mistake if I give up the A9 and the guilt is eating at me. What would you advice me if you were indeed the friend that comes to dinner two Thursdays of every month?
I also have the Tamron trinity: 17-28, 28-75 original, 70-180. As well as the Sigma 100-400, Sony 85 1.8, and Sony 200-600 with1.4 tc. Maybe my lenses are not the best for the A9?
For photography only, I’d go with the primes for video or 50/50 hybrid shooting where AF and focus breathing are top concerns, I’d go with the zoom (as I am planning to do - I already have the primes and love them).
@@3BMEP Thank you for responding. Not changing lens all the time is an advantage for the zoom but sometimes I find myself strugling in which focal length to use because I also zoom with my legs with a zoom lens.
Tamron is inching closer to giving us a Divine Duaity™ (2.8 or better) to replace the Holy Trinity. Yes it will be heavier than a traditional f/4 set but vs anything 2.8 of better... the extra weght would be marginal. Imagine dumping an entire lens out of your bag and run-and-guning with only one extra lens, perhaps just in a lens case or photog jacket?
Why is it as late as 2005'sh Tamron most people and reviews by magazine and dealers didn't recommend them as they were way inferior to manufacturers lenses sigma also , but in my experience the quility of visual and material biuld quality were on very close par with any lense for most part, but now everyone is head over heals with them ?
My new Holy Trinity for the incoming A7iv: Sony GM 16-35, Tamron 35-150, and Sigma 150-600 😁. One of each brand, and a 37.5x zoom range (56.25 if you include apsc crop 😎)
These plus the 50 1.2
Any reason why you chose the sigma 150 over the Tamron 150-500?
Yes! I was thinking something very similar regarding the new Trinity for focal lengths
Hands-down my favorite lens of all time, with the Sony 50mm f/1.2 GM being my second closest favorite. Btw, I put only a small piece of gaffer tape over the USB port, lol. I used the Tamron at a tree lighting event over the weekend and it was so freeing being able to get a 35mm crowd shot and a 150mm tree-top star and fireworks shot all within a couple of seconds, and all while wet snow was falling! I would've never been able to get that variety of shots before without missing some moment happening. I call it The Freedom Lens. :)
It’s in a different class altogether, but I love the 28-200 Tamron. I see the appeal of not changing lenses… I’m just glad there are many options for each use case!
Although I am not anywhere closer to making a decision between the Tamron 35-150 F2-2.8, Sony 70-200 F2.8 GMII or getting more primes - like GM 50 F1.2 and Samyang/Sony 135 F1.8 - I have to say that I absolutely enjoyed watching this review and your way of narrating is spectacular. This is the first video I have seen on this channel and I will certainly check out more. Thanks for the very informative and detailed review!
M pleasure, Daniel - and welcome!
I’m exactly in your decision situation 😂. Let me know what you decided 🙏
Just came back from a holiday family trip shooting on the lens for 5 days. If you don’t have a ton of lens already and you can bear with the weight it’s a no brainer. And it’s not even that heavy in hand.
For me I went for the 70-200 gm v2…..I enjoy landscape and low light work,so for me a lens of this weight needed a tripod collar,it’s a lot of weight hanging off the mount,and image stabilisation is always handy to have.It was a tough choice however…..the Tamron is a marvel of a lens by the sound of it.👍🏻👍🏻
Tried the lens on a presentation this weekend on my Z8.
Maybe a good allround lens, but I was disappointed about the stug zoomring and the poor fitting on my camera.
There was a small rotational movement when I zommed in and out. I'm going to pass on this one. Verry disappointed because I had high hopes about this one.
The fact that the 35mm end opens up to f2 is what makes this a one lens to rule them all for certain people than the typical fixed f2.8 zoom lenses.
Yeah. My favourite lens is a 35mm 1.4, 35mm so versatile FL och 1.4 makes for composing e.g. environmental portraits with interesting surroundings (actual context) and good looking background separation. Then 'downgrading' to 2.8 is not an option really, but 2.0 could pass.... and add so many more options for framing the shot...
Got this lens a couple of weeks ago and it is the best zoom I've had in a 35-year product-lifestyle photo career. It's big, heavy, and well, just stunning. Combined with something like the new Sony 16-35 f/4 PZ plus a 100-ish macro and 97% of my workflow is covered. (And we won't mention all the other lenses kicking around my office...) As always, thanks for a great and thoughtful review.
I can imagine this lens has a whole bunch of manufactures pulling their hair out right now & Tamron / Sony are laughing all the way to the bank & It literally put the brakes on me Switching back to Canon from Sony. I picked one up and it’s probably one of the best lenses I’ve ever owned
enjoy!
This is my 4th time watching this video, it's that good. I love how you have a discussion about other potential lens setups instead of just listing off specs like other reviewers. I'm selling my A7III and 24-70mm DG DN to fund a new body and lens. I was initially going to default to the new hotness (A7IV + 35-150mm F2-2.8), but this review got my gears turning. You got me thinking about cropping with primes on an A7RIV. It's very tempting because I only do photography and the A7RIV can be found for the same price as the A7IV right now. A 24mm f1.4 GM (36mm f2.1 in crop mode) and 50mm f1.2 GM (75mm f1.8 in crop mode) would basically give me the same range as my 24-70mm but with more sharpness, light gathering, and shallower depth of field. My primary concern is the A7RIV itself, I have read that the autofocus is actually a downgrade from my A7III and the need to use higher SS to achieve critical sharpness is concerning. I can work around these shortcomings but it certainly means I'll get less keepers.
Another great review, thanks. I've had this lens since it was released. I love it. I keep my photography simple because 75% is hiking in the woods, or near a lake or anywhere my legs will take me and this lens is perfect to capture whatever catches my attention. I used to carry 2 lenses (24-70 and 70-180) and now I carry one. For me it was that simple.
Thanks for sharing!
@RM Clark, how do you find the weight of that lens when hiking?
@@zbieraj It's heavy but not overly burdensome in my opinion. I have a good shoulder strap and that helps. Most of my hikes are 2-3 hours. I can see though if someone is on an all day hike the weight might be an issue. I love the versatility and picture quality. I suggest renting one or find one in a camera store so you can get a idea of the weight.
I’m keeping the Tamron 17-28, a 50mm 1.4 and the 35-150 coupled with the A7iv Keller combo. And the 35-150 in super 35 giving around 15MP if you need that extra throw for events. You can also use it in the studio
I’ll be running a triple Tamron setup of the 17-28 f2.8, 35-150 f2-2.8, and 150-500. I used to run the setup, but with a 28-75 f2.8 instead. I’m going to see how this one does for me though; especially when I’m not shooting wildlife (leave the 150-500 home), when that extra reach of the 150 can come in handy.
I'm actually getting this at the end of 2022 for my ZV-E10. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna keep it for the next ten years, along with my 11-20 and 18-50.
How do you like the 11-20?
Awesome review! Love your inputs! I actually have the same setup.. Sony 20mm 1.8 for gimbal work and 35-150 for fixed/stationary video. For photo work, 35-150 as the general lens and a nice prime like the 50 1.2 for it's bokeh. That's 3 lenses for both photo and video work! I have reduced my lens loadout from a carry-on roller to a small backpack. It has been phenomenal knowing you've got the ranges covered in such as small package. Another thought.. out with the old lens trinity (16-35, 24-70-70-200), in with the new trinity (16-35, 35-150,100-400) lol
It's exciting that such fast glass can be made on a zoom. I would love something stripped down for the APSC world, something fast with maybe 24-240mm f/2.8-f/4 built to a similar size.
Hugh, another excellent informative review. And FYI, rubber USB-C covers are available everywhere for cheap. Now if only Tamron would start making L Mount lenses [heavy sigh]...
This IS the lens for me and my main docu uses. The right focal length range, the right fast aperture. One lens, no changes. I was reminded of this last time I tried to change a lens in stair-rod rain - not good. I’ve tried and failed with both of the DSLR variations of the previous 35-150, Nikon and Canon. Lovely lens, couldn’t make the AF work reliably on either. So that takes me back to Sony after previously having been clear that our relationship was over. To an A9, to be precise. Please: let this be my documentary last port of call. My Leicas are still for the joy of photography, my Canons are still for sport. But for docu: Sony A9, battery grip, Tamron 35-150 1:2-2.8, Sony Zeiss 55mm 1:1.8 in my coat pocket.
Note there are smartphones with open USB-C ports designed for protection against full submersion. It is of little issue for Tamron to have the same level of protection for the USB-C ports on the 28-75 G2 or 35-150 VXD. Then there's the ability to change the MF behavior from by-wire to a programmed linear rack of the user's preference. Snap. Smart lenses are pretty.
Ordered this in November for the 7R3 and indoor sports, still on backorder as the seasons ended. Will also use it on a R4 or A1 not sure which one I'll get next.
I finally pulled the trigger and ordered this lens I plan on mostly using this lens by itself, and storing (i don't think i'm selling) my Tamron 24mm 2.8, Samyang 35mm 1.4, and Sony 85mm 1.8. Next I want to up/downgrade from my Godox AD400 Pro to the AD300 Pro and save space and weight there. Now I gotta get a new camera bag since mine is old and falling apart now. Just need enough room my Sony a7 iii + Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8, AD300 Pro and my 11" iPad Pro.
The sharpness of this video in 4k is so overwhelming to almost ridiculous, never thought a7s + this Tamron can offer such a result, of course the lighting is also perfect, great quality.
Do you have a street photography/photography course available online? i would be happy to pay for it. thank you.
Lovely, measured and thoughtful delivery. Love your style.
Thank you, Jonathon!
This is exactly my dream lens. Now to get a job that'll let me afford it - and hopefully it'll be out for Nikon Z by then (haven't switched yet, but intend to).
Jenny! It’s been a while - nice to see you here!
@@3BMEP still checking in with the content regularly, just been quite busy with life - hope you all are doing well over there!
This lens and my A7R iv is such an ideal match. The photos I'm seeing are amazing.
i have a a7R4 and want to have this 35-150, can I know your real world af speed how good it is to shoot sports or fast moving subjects?
For what I do on digital, it’s almost like Tamron made this lens especially for me. I had the earlier 2.8-4 version for Canon and it was ideal, though there were AF issues. But with this on the front of my A9, I might even have to put my beloved Canon system into hibernation. A fast 35-150: it’s perfection.
The exposed USB-C port is a NON-issue. Easiest fix there is, just order some USB-C plugs/caps on Amazon or eBay. One day I'll save enough to get this Tamron. I currently shoot with a Sony a7 iii, 85mm 1.8 , 35mm 1.4, and 20mm 2.8.
This is a dream for indoor sports and events. It would also make my life much easier shooting weddings...but I'll never NEVER replace my primes for wedding day. Id fight someone over my 56 1.2 lol even though it's finicky the character, color, fall off, is just my favorite
Ended up selling Sony 35mm f1.8, Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, and Tamron 70-180mm f2.8 to fund this lens. Family Portraits/Weddings; I have a A7RIII with this 35-150mm f2.8, and an A7III with no lens yet, considering Tamron 17-28mm f2.8, Sigma 14-24mm f2.8, or Viltrox/Samyang 24mm f1.8 options. Second shooter with A7c and Rokinon 18mm f2.8 and Sony 85mm f1.8. Excited to finish off the season with these.
Tamron makes great lenses, I know that they acquired Bronica back around 2005. Some speculate that Tamron manufacturered the lenses for Bronica during the 1980’s and 1990’s.
I can guess how spectacular is this lens, first because I trust your experience and second because I am a long time Tamron user. My word, if I had to pick one, about this lens would be also “exceptional”, judging from my experience using Tamron lenses. Though I can’t (sadly) buy the 35-150mm since I am using DSLR, I would like to share some general thoughts on the brand.
1) there’s no competition to Tamron for a given price, on any segment. Sure, you can find way better lenses from Canon, Nikon, Sony or Zeiss but you gonna pay for them… much more money. Just consider this: every Tamron today (from 269€ onwards) has weather sealing and comes with a lens hood. Spending some extra money you also have premium build quality, fluorine coatings, internal focusing, ultrasonic focusing, real focus ring and class leading IS… my 70-210mm f4 is the perfect example. And pay an extra you can have a beast of a lens like 70-200 f2.8 G2… for about half the price of Canon or Nikon equivalent. So the prices are right.
2) the balance between sharpness and character. That also really awesome given the price! Tamron lenses (the more expensive anyway) are sharp! Period. But not “industrially” sharp the Sigma way… let’s say creamy sharp, with nice transition to the out of focus areas. I find them sharp across the frame but I am using APSC camera, I can’t judge the very edges for sharpness.
And 3) the most important aspect for me is the color rendition. To my eyes, my Canon camera works the best on Tamrons, not so much on Canon lenses because the later tend to oversaturate the image a lot. I suspect the coatings are different here, but what I can say, my raw images are a tiny bit warmer and more neutral looking on Adobe Standard profile on Tamron, while Canon has a tendency to the cold tones and more saturated reds. Ok, color is strongly subjective matter but for me is important.
Thanks for reading! And nice review Hugh!
Thanks for sharing your perspective!
Picked one up partially due to this review and I love it.
Enjoy!
I reallt don't mind flares, I like them for some photo's actually
Sigma's 35 1.2, 85 1.4, 105 1.4, 135. 1.8 or GM equivalent would be the only option to replace the Tamron 35-150mm and that combo of primes would be in the $7k to 9k dollars.
Hey, didn't mind the bird 🙂, sounds wonderful. Some 8 months after you recorded this..Such a great video and so much information on various angles of choosing the right lens.
This is my first real zoom lens. I don't remember being so happy for a gear acquisition since I got me my A7III in 2018. The Tamron is heavy as hell but I'm working out, so it's a challenge. Jokes aside, it's so sturdy and smooth in operation, fantastic images and AF. Very front heavy and I really needed to tighten up the tripod.
So my main use is going to be for photography and it's usually live music or events in general. Portraiture of course, and video when needed. Since this also was the most expensive lens I've ever bought, I'm faking the 25mm focal length by using the Sigma 16mm f1.4 for APS-C, then my A7III goes automatically to crop mode, and there I am in some 22mm full frame, right? And I love that Sigma, with smart framing I can get wonderful images.
Still, Tamron needs to up their game when it comes to user manuals and tutorials. It's so difficult to find on their website and it seems they're directly turned to pros, and not beginner/intermediate. I tried to find information on configuring the option buttons 1-3 as well as smart buttons but it's a drag. Hoping some mercyful soul will make an instructional video about it all. I'm not nagging, only think that a prime price taken obligates for a more user friendly and inviting attitude.
I have the Sony 20mm 1.8 Tamron 35-150 and the Sony for events and it’s perfect. If I’m just going out and about real quick then I have a 35GM
Maybe a 35-100 F1.8 would be cool!
Yeah but then it would be huge and heavier.
It could probably be done...in a body the size of the 200-600mm G
Thanks Hugh for a wonderful review!
Glad you enjoy it, David! :)
The only competitor to this lens that I am currently considering is the new Sony 70-200 f2.8 GM II because I tend to be in that focus length 90% of the time.
In that case and, if you have the money, go for it. It’s amazing and “In Stock” in almost every retailer.
@@tecnolatino5552 Yeah, haha, still working a bit on that first part. But i'll get there...
A rubber cover on the usb-c could make it less water resistant … with an open port, they can seal it and basically make it water proof (not only water resistant) - with a cap, the moisture could build up and ruin it easily .., there’s a reason why smartphones doesn’t have a cap on the port even with IP67 etc …
Thanks for the insight!
I can see the appeal of this lens, but I really having wide as an option without changing lenses for my main zoom so I am stuck with a 24-70 F2.8. I also have a 24-240mm that I love for flexibility... and it got me thinking... why do we make lenses like that as extended kit zooms but not anything that is "pro" grade. I would love a 24-200 that is F2.8-F4 that has an 82mm filter thread that costs $2.2K-$2.5K and is actually good optically. I think a lot of people would find a lens like that compelling.
might get this someday i got the 28-70mm f2.8 sigma for now . but this might be a nice upgrade lol
Hi Hugh, Until recently, my only lens was Tamron's 70-180mm attached to my Sony FX3 which I always kept mounted on a DJI Ronin RS 2. After buying this lens, I mothballed the 70-180mm and now I exclusively use the 35-150mm on the FX3 and Ronin RS 2. Since I don't manually focus, I repurposed DJI's focus motor to control zoom via the Tethered Control Handle while filming primarily in briefcase mode. I haven't had any issues with this setup, and so I was just curious why you caveated your recommendation with, "as long as we're not talking gimbal work"? Thanks!
It’s a very front-heavy set-up that doesn’t work well for Claudia (I don’t imagine it would work well for me, either); it would put too much stress on the Weebill S class gimbal that we favor - that is, a gimbal perfectly adequate when used with, say a 35 prime; and it would put too much stress, I fear, on the lens mount itself unless used with a lens support. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to articulate the specific set of considerations which led me to say what I did!
@@3BMEP I appreciate the insights. Thank you, sir!
With a voice like that you should do ASMR videos 😃 But to comment on the topic of the video, this lens looks like a fantastic lens! Really hope I have a chance to try it sometime 😊
😜😊🖖🏻
@@3BMEP You should absolutely share your voice to the Sleepcasts of Headspace :D.
Brilliant analysis. These Tamron zooms on my new Z9, Z mount please.
The birds also want to add to this wonderful review! I love hearing you talking so appasionately about a good lens. I wonder... Would you ever make a "disappointing lenses" video that never met the specifications you expected?
I believe I HAVE mentioned when I've been disappointed any number of times before for specific issues (e.g., distortion in the 70-180).
Dear sir,
Thank you for your video.
I just discover that lens and it seems that you are the right person to ask for those questions with, I promise, short, backstory.
I am an ex-Nikon user, who switched to M43 system 2 years ago. Reason: I wanted to have smaller and lighter gear to take with me everywhere - mostly shooting just the pictures to have them as memories of places or to take pictures of my family and friends. Rarely also architecture, landscape and street. However, due to the sensor size, I ended up with a lot of 1.4 lenses (17mm, 25mm, 56mm) plus one UWA, but also a zoom 14-40 f/2.8. In the beginning it seemed fine that I had like 1-2 lenses and that I change them rarely. I started to shoot much more pictures than ever before. But then, I started to get more MFT prime lenses, because sometimes I needed different focal lengths. Now I am doing much less photos because I am stressed that every 5 minutes I will need to switch them, which is just annoying... The thing is that now my bag actually weights 414g (E-M5 Mark III body with battery) and 1.040g of just the lenses... I found out that even the cheapest A7C (I need that 5-IBIS) plus Tamron 35-150 weights around 100g more than that. It seems that coming back to FF and having this lens could mean that I would have only one lens mounted for ever and that's it.
Here come my questions:
1. Would you recommend this lens (and purchasing any entry-level mirrorless camera from sony), get back to FF, for my case?
2. If I woul still use a waist-bag for my camera (so my back is not affected with the camera), would you consider that once in a while longer walk on the beaches of the Northern Sea (Denmark here) would be fine regarding comfort of taking it for a longer walks?
3. How do you handle having it in your hand for 10+ more minutes? Does your hand hurts, or is it heavy, but not enough to create health issues in the wrists?
Sincerely,
Zbieraj
The short answer: I’d suggest Tamron’s 28-75/2.8 G2 as a better choice given your concerns, perhaps with a high resolution a7 R IV to give you some additional reach.
@@3BMEP Thank you for your response and your time to write it :). I appreciate it. And sorry for the weird way I wrote the comment, it was after midnight in DK and I was too tired.
Regarding your response, I was wondering then about two other things:
- The reason why I use Sigma 56mm f/1.4 for MFT is that I have that 112mm reach. Which sometimes still feels like it is not large enough. Just 3 days ago I wanted to take pictures of my daughter iceskating, but then I realized that even with this FF 112mm, she was still pretty far away. Therefore I think that for Tamron 28-75/2.8 G2 I would need additional 75mm+ lens. That brings back two problems: heavy bag, even heavier than the current setup I have and the fact that I still need to switch lenses. What I also don't like about my current MFT system is that I can not go under F/1.4 AF (in MFT setup), without spending a lot of money on bulky and heavy OLY F/1.2. What is tempting with this Tamron is that on every focal length of that Tamron I can go with shallower DOF than on any OLY PRO F/1.2.
- The a7 R IV weights 665g with batteries (comparing to 509g from A7C). Tamron 28-75/2.8 G2 weights 539g, giving together 1.204g. A7C + Tamron 35-150mm weight all together 1.674g. Yes, heavier by 450g for the hand, but the bag would be lighter due to the additional need for some telephoto range then.
- One extra thing: A7R IV price is way over my budget for the body.
Yes, I like to have UWA/WA lens for those specific cases of landscape/architecture/night sky photography and sometimes for (other) YT channel. But I think that I could have here one lens from range of 12-24mm, which could be even f/4.0 (maybe cheap prime). But in recent years I really switched to use the range of 35mm-112mm (unfortunately not more than those 112mm).
This is why I am stuck regarding the decision what to do. The range of that Tamron is exactly the range I need from 95-99% of all the pictures I am taking. But again, I just wonder about the weight, especially on the longer trips. I wonder if I can hold it in my hand for like 10-15 minutes, while walking in the landscape before I will put it back to my waist bag. I don't want to have the stripe for puting the camera on my neck (I like the wrist ones though and actually on my Oly right now I use the finger one).
Eh, I don't know that to do. I would buy this Tamron 35-150mm lens anytime now, but the weight... I know that trying to hold 1,5kg potato bag is not the same as holding a camera with the lens :D, but maybe I should make such test for my wrist...
Sincerely,
Zbieraj
@@zbieraj Stay with your micro-four-thirds (MFT) system. The Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD lens is a boat anchor. It weighs a whopping 41.1 oz (2.57 lbs)/1165 g and has a front element of 82 mm. That's a large piece of glass. You asked whether you could hand hold that lens for 10 minutes! Unless you're built like King Kong, you'd be doing well to hold that lens steady for 30 seconds, let alone 10 minutes.
This is what I recommend for your MFT system:
1) Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III: 14.6 oz / 414 g
2) Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 12-35mm f/2.8 II ASPH. POWER O.I.S. Lens: 10.8 oz / 305 g
(Alternatively,: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO: 13.47 oz / 382 g)
3) Panasonic Lumix G X Vario 35-100mm f/2.8 II POWER O.I.S. Lens: 12.59 oz / 357 g
Total weight = 1076g/2.37 pounds
@@chesslover8829 I switched last winter. My A7C + Tamron 35-150mm weights 1,5kg, whereas my MFT gear, that I always had to have with me, had 1,6kg. The problem with your setup is that it is f/2.8, with DOF level of f/5.8 of FF eq.
With A7C + 35-150 I was able to take more pictures than before, due to fact that I did not need to change any lens, since I have one 24/7 and also due to the fact that I could shoot in many occasions with much stronger DoF.
My height is 186cm, I have overweight, I do not attend to gym, I have asthma and I can hold that camera for hours in idle position (camera turned towards ground). I was able to comfortably hike in Norwegian fjords last summer. No issues.
When shooting - no-one shoots hand-held photos beyond 0.5s on FF, so this is is also not a problem.
I actually think that switching to that Tamron 35-150mm was one of the most important photo-gear decision I made in my entire life and I think it was the best one.
It seems to be a great lens but nowhere to be found. Thanks for the video.
You can always buy your own USB-C cover from Amazon?
I'm concerned by the USB port on the lens, weathersealed ? Hmm i don't think so... + the risk of the dust inside.... SAV feedback coming
Fantastic Review Hugh!! I have been waiting for your take. Awesome. Love this lens. I’m looking to pair it with the incoming A74. I guess we will see in January.
It’s a pretty irresistible combo, Mark. I can just see you carrying it on the street wearing your Apricoat!
Seriously considering replacing my Sigma 24-70 with this one. Just wondering if I'd pay the weight price for the reach/convenience.
You would feel the difference, that’s for sure.
I'm about to get either the Sony a7c or the a74 and you have made me think harder about what lense(s) I want. Well done. Love your insights and eloquence. Subbed.
Welcome!
By the way. What about the bird nest ?
Great video!!!!
Glad you enjoyed . 😊🖖🏻
Excellent Review. I have a question regarding the Strap you mentioned. I don't mind carrying the weight all day if I can simply leave the body and the lens combination hung from a solid strap when I am not using. Where I am concerned is that if it will create pressure over the Lens mount and cause any mechanical damage. As a result, most of the times if I have to support the lens with one hand even when I am not using will be a problem (While I am travelling)
Can you advice in this regard please?
Many Thanks!
Good point! I'd be less concerned about carry as I've described it than having the camera parked on a tripod (like we do in the bat cave). An optional tripod collar would allay that particular fear.
You should do audio books! New to your channel absolutely loving the content. Amazing
Thank you -- and welcome!
Brother if this was in L-Mount I would buy it Today.
Is the image quality better than the Sony 24-105mm lens, which one would you pick? Thank you.
I’ve found significant differences in image quality from one Sony 24-105/4 to the next among less than half a dozen samples over as many years, so I can’t really tell you. But if someone were to offer me the choice as a gift, I’d take the Tamron.
Thank you for responding
thanks
In college, in a galaxy far far away, my photojournalism professor (and mentor) use to lecture me the way you craft your reviews. Me, meaning as a photojournalism major I was the only dedicated major in the photography classes in the school of journalism at that time. He sounded a like you. Giving guidance, solid advice, and sharing his intuitive projections about prolific photographic advancements. I always seemed to extract the essence of his extended remarks before falling into a mental narcoleptic trance (I was young back then). I'm a prime lens guy too. I almost gave myself the Christmas gift of the latest Sony 35mm GM lens. I've seen all the other RUclips videos on this Tamron lens. Yeah, I'll add a few extra bucks and get this lens for it's focal versatility. The bad part is it seems there is no place in the US that this lens can be purchased. Everyone says "oh we have no idea when a shipment will be allocated to us".
I'll get the lens partly because I have a healthy respect for your opinions on different photographic topics. Mainly, because in some of your videos I hear that college photojournalism professor keeping me awake long enough to hear the wisdom. Thanks.
Thank you for such a generous take - and sharing a bit of your history!
When do you plan on selling your A7S III? I’ve been waiting for a while to get one in stock and was curious.
Well, I put the order in for the 'IV yesterday... but I don't want to give up the a7s III much before the 'IV arrives...
@@3BMEP Totally understand. When you’re ready to sell, how much are you thinking of selling for? If I saw pics and knew the shutter count, I may be willing to buy from you.
Great review by the way! My Tamron is on it’s way now!
Hugh, first off I have to say that I would kill to be able to have you as part of my inner circle of friends, I just adore you! And, no, I would not actually kill, but I would, I don't know... swim the English Channel in a bathing suit in January.... whatever.
I am quite new to photography and I am growing into it. I do wildlife, landscapes, street (I live in Seattle so I have everything around me). I used to shoot an A7iii and loved it and then I was talked into getting the A9 because I do like to get BIF, but I am not loving it and I'm only getting 20% keepers. I appreciate the speed but the AF is crazy complicated to get right and I think I made a mistake getting it because the learning process has just discouraged me from getting out to shoot. I have the 7iv in order... but I can't help thinking I might be making a big mistake if I give up the A9 and the guilt is eating at me. What would you advice me if you were indeed the friend that comes to dinner two Thursdays of every month?
I also have the Tamron trinity: 17-28, 28-75 original, 70-180. As well as the Sigma 100-400, Sony 85 1.8, and Sony 200-600 with1.4 tc.
Maybe my lenses are not the best for the A9?
Don’t second guess. Enjoy the a7 IV recognizing that you’ll have to put in the time to get it dialed in for you - just less time than the a9!
They’re all fine.
Can we balance this on crane 2?
35-150 2.8-4 was not nikon only
Thank you sir. I have the a7c and I am torn between the 28-75 g2 or the 24 f2 with 65 f2. Help please…
For photography only, I’d go with the primes for video or 50/50 hybrid shooting where AF and focus breathing are top concerns, I’d go with the zoom (as I am planning to do - I already have the primes and love them).
@@3BMEP Thank you for responding. Not changing lens all the time is an advantage for the zoom but sometimes I find myself strugling in which focal length to use because I also zoom with my legs with a zoom lens.
Why is this guy reviewing a lens like he's reading an audio book?
2470, 70200 buh bye. I hate dust on the sensor. It has an insidious way of sneaking in on you.
L mount please
How does this lens work for taking macro shots?
In the same way as with any other non-dedicated macro lens, by attaching extension tubes or a dioptre (or both).
It’s not a macro lens but it has close focusing capabilities.
Tamron is inching closer to giving us a Divine Duaity™ (2.8 or better) to replace the Holy Trinity. Yes it will be heavier than a traditional f/4 set but vs anything 2.8 of better... the extra weght would be marginal. Imagine dumping an entire lens out of your bag and run-and-guning with only one extra lens, perhaps just in a lens case or photog jacket?
Internal Zoom! Please! The same lens, but with an internal zoom! I don't ask too much!
🙏🏾
Why is it as late as 2005'sh Tamron most people and reviews by magazine and dealers didn't recommend them as they were way inferior to manufacturers lenses
sigma also , but in my experience the quility of visual and material biuld quality were on very close par with any lense for most part, but now everyone is head over heals with them ?
👍 sorry to be 666.