If you're making a weapon you need it to do one thing and do it well, if we can make a gun that has no way of missing why wouldn't we? That's just a more effective weapon than what we currently have
bro heat-seekers are tracking jet engines which are insanely hot compared to humans, if you would fire it near a heat source like a grill, you would shoot the grill and not the person you want to hit...
Same argument was used for cartridges, semi automatics, and automatics too. “What you want my gunpowder wad surrounded with metal and a primer built into a one time use shot? No thanks give me my muzzle loading musket any day. I won’t even entertain shooting hundreds of those a second. “
@@wastelesslearning1245 Electronics is another story. Not to forget that more complex stuff gets, more likely to malfunction it gets. Gold disks are still a thing even though we have SSDs for example.
@@vegitoblue2187 your ignoring economy of scale and modern manufacturing techniques of silicon chips grow thousands of chips simultaneously. Only reasons we don’t is because a few companies want to keep their golden goose and keep their processes hush. Making a new chip producing lab is nutritiously difficult because the pre-existing companies have first movers advantage and they develop all their important equipment in house (and don’t sell or share how to in specifics with anyone). So new private production will have to figure out how to make the tools to make the tools to make the chips assuming copyright is ignored (like it often is in China or During war time state of emergency economy like in the world wars in America).These problems are ones that can and are being brute forced by governments and if the leading chip companies get on bored for profit, won’t even be a problem in the first place. (Electronic guns would actually have less moving parts then mechanical devices especially for dumb guns with multiple firing modes and programmable rate of fire) but that’s is a dumb electronic gun not a aimbot gun. See Bullet Storm for some real life potential. Terns our physical mechanism handicap fire rate. Method 2: the commercially available scope only uses 1 computer system to fire infinite dumb rounds by calculating bullet trajectory and auto shooting. Is the design perfect? No some idiot decided to make something wireless and Hackable when should be wired and close system. But this method it’s one chip and done for all dumb rounds fired. No moving parts have to be added. And if you do get over the superstition of complexity, you will have spare parts to spare that could use for a auto gimbal targeting system like we already see perfectly acceptable to have and use in our turret patrol bots. However if you combine this commercially available tech with a e-gun without the gimbal, you can still have a “smart aimbot gun” with the only moving part being the bullet (like bullet storm) or still get away with a net loss of moving parts compared to other weapons reducing “complexity” all around. If the projectiles are the chipped smart micro guided missiles DARPA is working on then the need for gun materials and moving parts is basicaly non existent since the projectile does all the work. A bullet storm of micro missiles like smart bullet would need no barrel, firing physical mechanism, heck even the trigger is optional. If you want a standard magazine and don’t mind adding a few moving parts yet still a net loss of complexity you can use a magazine/e-slide and discharge system. That would make it remarkably compact with minimal recoil. Remember it’s basicaly a magazine, handle with no barrel and cams/target sensors on it. Not much longer then the handle needs to be.
@@wastelesslearning1245 the correction on the gun itself which the video mentioned is far more viable than smart rounds. Those are gonna be harder to find. Not to forget extra investment to protect the rounds from moisture which anyways is likely gonna have a lower shelf life.Also, I think the rounds would be more toxic due to silicon oxide which may form during the firing of a shot which might violate Geneva Convention (not 100% sure about it in this case). I'm just saying smart rounds is a bad idea. But that is not the only approach. Still, the guidance system can be faulty either way with jammers, emps, even in places with magnetic fields.
@@vegitoblue2187 if it’s wired in a Faraday casing it will be immune to jams and emps. You could also stream info to the smart round with laser inscription though that’s unnecessary assuming the smart rocker bullet doesn’t have a ai on bored. We also know how to harden devices inner circuitry to EMPs too. Considering DARPA is re-searching and made it, I don’t think the shallow Geneva conventions are a problem. Silicon is also not that toxic in the first place compared to some of the Stuff we fire like lead and depleted uranium not to mention the decades of leaving it in your body to start poisoning you won’t kill you before the bleed out will. If it makes people feel bedder they’re can always surround the chip in materials the body does not reject or not leak to contain the ingredients. We also figured out water proofing decades ago. Encasing water susceptible gunpowder in tight Cartridges was the major advantage over paper wads. Guidance system can be updated by pre approved USB getting only better with time and could probably have different modes for different gun trajectory’s. Also the guidance systems is already better by way of more reliable then any marksman faulty caveman eye aim. US literally prints money for military spending. Other countries pockets will hardly notice especially when the tech is already developed by the company in this video and DIYers on RUclips.
The military who could turn on us? Wouldn't we all be allowed to use them. Smart gun on smart gun battles are who gets a lock first basically who looks at each other first.
And this Is why tf2 sucks it basically punishes noobs because they get killed by the pros who are angry in tf2 because there getting killed by noobs And that's why TF1 IS BETTER
I thought smart pistols were smart enough to finish my homework
Yes but it's smart enough to finish the class
But is it smart enough to take down a titan
Gosh darn you
@@theboi9081 all the students in record time
Well we have smart bullets so i dont see why we cant a smart pistol
find a pistol that fires .50 rifle rounds
don actually exists
i meant a mag fed pistol
don yeah which is small aswell ^^ (i guess that exacto 50 bmg needs quite some time to correct so it wouldnt be good on Close distance anyways
But can it do calculus?
If you're making a weapon you need it to do one thing and do it well, if we can make a gun that has no way of missing why wouldn't we? That's just a more effective weapon than what we currently have
only a matter of time before we get legions smart core IRL
I swear, seeing the words "PILOT LOCKING" as a pilot has to be the scariest fucking thing
Let me guess... Texas?
It's like the shoulder shots from iron man 1
It would need to have heat seeking bullets
bro heat-seekers are tracking jet engines which are insanely hot compared to humans, if you would fire it near a heat source like a grill, you would shoot the grill and not the person you want to hit...
I think smart bullets is impractical considering how many one would fire and each shot could be pretty expensive
Same argument was used for cartridges, semi automatics, and automatics too.
“What you want my gunpowder wad surrounded with metal and a primer built into a one time use shot? No thanks give me my muzzle loading musket any day. I won’t even entertain shooting hundreds of those a second. “
@@wastelesslearning1245 Electronics is another story. Not to forget that more complex stuff gets, more likely to malfunction it gets.
Gold disks are still a thing even though we have SSDs for example.
@@vegitoblue2187 your ignoring economy of scale and modern manufacturing techniques of silicon chips grow thousands of chips simultaneously. Only reasons we don’t is because a few companies want to keep their golden goose and keep their processes hush. Making a new chip producing lab is nutritiously difficult because the pre-existing companies have first movers advantage and they develop all their important equipment in house (and don’t sell or share how to in specifics with anyone). So new private production will have to figure out how to make the tools to make the tools to make the chips assuming copyright is ignored (like it often is in China or During war time state of emergency economy like in the world wars in America).These problems are ones that can and are being brute forced by governments and if the leading chip companies get on bored for profit, won’t even be a problem in the first place.
(Electronic guns would actually have less moving parts then mechanical devices especially for dumb guns with multiple firing modes and programmable rate of fire) but that’s is a dumb electronic gun not a aimbot gun. See Bullet Storm for some real life potential. Terns our physical mechanism handicap fire rate.
Method 2: the commercially available scope only uses 1 computer system to fire infinite dumb rounds by calculating bullet trajectory and auto shooting. Is the design perfect? No some idiot decided to make something wireless and Hackable when should be wired and close system. But this method it’s one chip and done for all dumb rounds fired. No moving parts have to be added. And if you do get over the superstition of complexity, you will have spare parts to spare that could use for a auto gimbal targeting system like we already see perfectly acceptable to have and use in our turret patrol bots. However if you combine this commercially available tech with a e-gun without the gimbal, you can still have a “smart aimbot gun” with the only moving part being the bullet (like bullet storm) or still get away with a net loss of moving parts compared to other weapons reducing “complexity” all around.
If the projectiles are the chipped smart micro guided missiles DARPA is working on then the need for gun materials and moving parts is basicaly non existent since the projectile does all the work. A bullet storm of micro missiles like smart bullet would need no barrel, firing physical mechanism, heck even the trigger is optional. If you want a standard magazine and don’t mind adding a few moving parts yet still a net loss of complexity you can use a magazine/e-slide and discharge system. That would make it remarkably compact with minimal recoil. Remember it’s basicaly a magazine, handle with no barrel and cams/target sensors on it. Not much longer then the handle needs to be.
@@wastelesslearning1245 the correction on the gun itself which the video mentioned is far more viable than smart rounds. Those are gonna be harder to find. Not to forget extra investment to protect the rounds from moisture which anyways is likely gonna have a lower shelf life.Also, I think the rounds would be more toxic due to silicon oxide which may form during the firing of a shot which might violate Geneva Convention (not 100% sure about it in this case).
I'm just saying smart rounds is a bad idea. But that is not the only approach. Still, the guidance system can be faulty either way with jammers, emps, even in places with magnetic fields.
@@vegitoblue2187 if it’s wired in a Faraday casing it will be immune to jams and emps. You could also stream info to the smart round with laser inscription though that’s unnecessary assuming the smart rocker bullet doesn’t have a ai on bored. We also know how to harden devices inner circuitry to EMPs too. Considering DARPA is re-searching and made it, I don’t think the shallow Geneva conventions are a problem. Silicon is also not that toxic in the first place compared to some of the Stuff we fire like lead and depleted uranium not to mention the decades of leaving it in your body to start poisoning you won’t kill you before the bleed out will. If it makes people feel bedder they’re can always surround the chip in materials the body does not reject or not leak to contain the ingredients. We also figured out water proofing decades ago. Encasing water susceptible gunpowder in tight Cartridges was the major advantage over paper wads. Guidance system can be updated by pre approved USB getting only better with time and could probably have different modes for different gun trajectory’s. Also the guidance systems is already better by way of more reliable then any marksman faulty caveman eye aim. US literally prints money for military spending. Other countries pockets will hardly notice especially when the tech is already developed by the company in this video and DIYers on RUclips.
The gun of shame will never die
You are the type of guy to camp in a corner in colony with a spitfire and A-Wall
@@rancidblock5615 And im Tone main, smart pistol, A-Wall, Devotion and satchel charges XD
Lmao he put the whole script in the desc
I want Battlefront 2 speculation on breakdown
Kantyna ooh not a bad idea
Aim-bot IRL
What if we had titans in about 10-20 years we could have huge city’s on Mars build by titans
South Korea is building a humanoid mech that they plan to sell commercially.
So can a spazzing pilot wreck a whole team, it just shoots when it’s on the right target
one day this earth will end like this game f### no respawn too OOOOF
I beat titan fall 2 and it can’t do that XD
TRIGGERBOT? 3:33
This is terrifying. Smart weapons should be illegal for civilians, I think it should only be aloud for the military.
The military who could turn on us? Wouldn't we all be allowed to use them. Smart gun on smart gun battles are who gets a lock first basically who looks at each other first.
@@Caparco71 If the Military uses it on us, we can report them for aimbot and walls.
*You know these guns would be perfect for school shootings*
Irl aim assist
What the fuck????
not pistol at all...
And this Is why tf2 sucks it basically punishes noobs because they get killed by the pros who are angry in tf2 because there getting killed by noobs
And that's why TF1 IS BETTER