For me Halo 1 was totaly beatyfull and i was 9 as well back than... in some aspects it looked better than any other halo game (particel effects which bounce of the ground and other surfaces unlike in other halos where it just fly tough the ground).
So, Xbox 360 only had like 1Gb RAM available for games and a 2007 processor (probably conceived 1 or 2 years before). How on Earth did they make Halo 4 look like that? pure optimization magic.
+Leo Nemesis 512mb ram, 10mb ED Ram with special logic onboard to enabled 4xMSAA without loss. 3x 3.2ghz CPU cores with two threads each. And 48 "Clusters" of radeon cores.
Alexander Lewis Simple. EA logic. If the PS3/360 were still next-gen and they decided to re-release for PS2 and original Xbox for the hell of it, they would make damn sure it looked like some low-grade PS1 game instead.
Halo 4 is still so beautiful. It was crazy to think that 343i could produce these graphics with hardware that was 8 years old! It still blows my mind. Halo 4 looks almost as good as current gen games.
@@SamTWP let me give some reasons 1. it was the divisive game at launch 2. fucked up the lore 3. ruins the fall of reach book 4.added the damn return to the battlefield timer that goes to others fps games 5. it had armor abilities 6. had fucking bloom 7. killed Halo Esports for 5 long years until halo 5 revived it
Halo 4 is so good because it brings out chiefs emotional side while the other games he's been just a soldier Actually we did not know what he really is and halo 4 is Amazing because it is emotional and told better chiefs personality
***** Halo CE: 8-10 hours. Halo 2: 7 hours Halo 3: 7 hours Halo 4: 6 hours. It mainly depends on which difficulty you play. If you're playing legendary, expect the length to be drastically longer :p
I was always someone who choice Heroic mode... feels right the most and in some halos it says thats how it should been :D Halo 4 was the shortest for me :( and Halo 2 the longest... well it has the most levels.
I understand that it is just a remaster but.. I think that the game on the old Xbox 360, while the Xbox 360 is 10 years old, still looks quite good, even by the standards of today. It shows how creative lightning and shader solutions combined with efficient geometry design can make great looking games. I can't wait to see what they'll be able to do with halo 5.
it wasn't remade, but it was remastered. It runs in native 1080p on Xbox One as opposed to 720p on Xbox 360, and runs at 60 FPS instead of 30 FPS. Noticeable changes when you're actually playing it. Resolution increase makes it much sharper, but bigger thing in my opinion is the 60 FPS, everything is incredibly smooth now.
Narvikboy "Remaster refers to quality enhancement of sound and/or picture to a previously existing recording" off wiki. They enhanced the picture quality to Halo 4, cleaned up textures, improved frame rate, its remastered. A remake is when they completely overhaul aspects of the game. Updating is taking the previous game and adding features to that previous game, not releasing a completely new version that is improved. Its why we see blue-rays of old movies are "digitally remastered". Now before you go all condescending on people at least know what you are talking about.
Halo 4 blew me away when I got it on launch visually, and honestly it wasn’t near as bad as people say. It’s honestly a really good game and it holds up insanely well
@@grobestadtwurst2041 Same, just played 5 for the first time today on PC by the Forge app, I was really excited. I think it looks worse is because they tried going for a really futuristic look and probably changed the lighting engine into a dynamic one
I think Halo 4’s aesthetic was much better than 5’s. Everything looks too clean and plastic-y in Halo 5. That being said, Halo 5 did run at a consistent 1080p/60 FPS, while Halo 4 ran at 720p/30 FPS
This+High resolution textures(And tessellation)+real dynamic lighting+Higher draw distance= 8 generation game graphics. Imagine that in the pc port OH YEAH.
I know this is a 2 year old comment, but it won't need real dynamic lighting if it already has great pre-compute ones, and for the rest of it, I think Halo Master Chief collection which now has Halo 4 is already doing that, if I'm not wrong, the Xbox One generation consoles and ahead are doing that too.
Quick piece of advice. If you want to comare 2 screens, don't flash them after each other, put them next to each other instead. Humans have something caleld change blindness. The inability to see changes when images are rapidly swapped. Especially small changes, but in some cases this can cover even a person missing in a group foto. xd
Don't worry mate. I've had twats like Ryan Swift for all intents and purposes telling me not to comment on videos simply because they're 'x' amount of time old. So needlessly antagonistic of them (or perhaps that's why they do it?).
Oh look a child has appeared. You seriously need to grow the fuck up. Anyway there was absolutely no point in this person wasting there time with this useless comment because the chances of them seeing it is slim and they also started doing it way before this person commented. So instead of attacking me for no absolute reason think about what I was talking about.
And here you are, wasting time on me. you also seemed to feel the need to bash my comment even though you argued it was worthless due to the age of the video. Stop contradicting yourself, than start talking.Ryan Swift
Today i just started to play and the nostalgy kicked in ... cannot wait for the whole collection to be completed. Great job and i highly appreciate your passion in doing this.
You can easily tell the difference! Even then though halo 4 really pushed the Xbox 360, and looked stunning. But Halo 4 on XB1 just brings it to a whole new level!
Holy shit there's a lot of people in here who don't know the definition of the word "remaster", must've failed English class or never looked at a dictionary before
Anscheinend verstehen hier viele Leute nicht, das das Hauptaugenmerk von der Halo Master Chief Collection auf Halo 2 liegt, da dieser Teil ja auch das "Anniversary-treatment" bekommen hat. Deshalb fallen die Verbesserungen bei den anderen Teilen natürlich verhältnismäßig geringer aus... Meiner Meinung nach aber trotzdem deutlich sichtbar!
@Ricardo Milos the art style isn't terrible, in fact it's great, but what's bad about it is that it's a drastic change over the old halo games. When i first started playing halo i started with halo 4, and i thought it was great. but since the master chief collection came out on pc i played through reach, 1, 2, and 3. and now i can see why a lot of people disliked halo 4. going back to 4 after playing the earlier games, it just feels way too different.
Man, the difference is insane! I mean, I thought the res and FPS would barely change the look of the game, but it looks so much cleaner :o (watch in 1080p btw)
So basically: An uplift in resolution, jaggies went missing Some if rare texture/level of detail uplifts. Dynamic Shadow render distance is the same on both (Why? Take note to the shadow of the dead grunt) Post processing/lighting/shader uplift Shadow resolution/quality still the same. Can't wait to download some graphical mods for H4 when it comes to PC sometime in the future.
While remastering does cover even the tiniest little changes, most people usually associate it with rather major overhauls like what happened with Homeworld. While Halo 4 was remastered, it seems a little too soon since the only real difference was slightly better resolution, smoother framerate, and some slight lighting improvements.
Its not remastered,just ported,the mcc only make the games run at a higger framerate and some ilumination details,but only halo ce and halo 2 were remastered
According to Wikipedia, the term remaster "... refers to enhancing the quality of the sound or of the image, or both, of previously created recordings, either audiophonic, cinematic, or videographic." Every game in the MCC is a remastering because the image quality (frame rate, resolution, lighting) has been improved. "Remade" is a better term for the graphical changes to Halo CE and 2.
If you're going to do a comparison video, then put them side by side (split in half). Otherwise it gets very difficult to see the changes. Once just seems to have more fog then the other.
my first console was X360 and my first game was Halo 4, when i play it, i actually thought that it was real life, for 2012 was a very nice looking game
Halo 4 may just get my nod as the most technically impressive game of the last gen: large play areas, superb AI, loads of particle effects, smooth/consistent frame-rate, gorgeous lighting, fantastic real-time cutscenes. The game just looked stunning! The only negative was the intrusive jaggies on some of the interior levels.
Halo 4 already looked great on Xbox360. The only big difference is 60fps. Gamers that are not "polygon counters" or obsessed with resolution can tell almost no defference between the Xbox360 version and the XboxOne.
I wouldn't really expect a "remastered" Halo 4 to be anything special. It was already goddamn close to Xbox 1 levels of graphics. Shiny, crisp, clear, etc.
Well, nothing has changed much but I can tell a little difference. The edges are much sharper and less blurred, his visor is too less blurred and has more shine/reflection to it, but that's my opinion.
I am a huge halo fan, too. When I first saw the graphic of Halo 4,the graphic of origin halo 4 is already very very very gorgeous,to think about it , it is only on xbox 360, ten more years old console.I think the graphic is at peak ,too.In my view the problem is only about resolution and frame on xbox one ,so just make it to 1080p and 60fps,is perfect.I think we should thanks halo team.Make classical halos all in 1080P and 60fps,it is an epic.
This isn't a "Remaster" of Halo 4, but a simple upgrade. The whole point of buying the collection is mainly for Halo 2 Anniversary, and all the multiplayer content. In this video it's fairly obvious that they kept the original textures from the 360 version, but the full resolution, and slightly increased shadowing detail on the XBOne version makes everything a little crisper and more realistic-looking.
Only a slight upgrade, yet Halo 4 was native 720p and the Halo 4 from HMCC is supposed to be 1080p, but I don't see much difference. Hopefully the frame rate is 60fps like it says and not 30fps.
the writing on the floor in the pelican bay argues otherwise, in the original it's readable, but has slight pixel at ion, remastered it's crisp and clear just like small text in gtav
The only difference I can see is there is some better texture quality and a more up to date rendering system when it comes to lighting/fx quality. I work with graphics and I have to really look to figure out the difference here.
I never had a xbox console (classic,360,one),but i have to say,this game is awesome,this is a real exclusive,good game to make xbox 360 become face to face with ps3 strenght than never. I dont have played any Halo´s game,i do not want to play this,but this game is Great.
It really doesn't matter because they look actually the same. It just looks like they've sharpened the texture, but H2A and CE was more of a remaster. :)
I love how many kids are crying over the fact that a remaster isn't a game that is graphically rebuilt from the ground up. Yes lately a lot of remastered titles have been, but that is not always the case. In general a remaster is just polished, ported, or a polished port. The term remaster does not mean that there has to be a huge graphics overhaul. Remaster simply means that improvements were made.
It's not remastered, the resolution has been increased and the lighting has been changed. 343i never used "Halo 4" and "remastered" in the same sentence, except for may with the addition of "not".
When you play the original Halo 4 (Xbox 360 version) you'll notice; when driving or walking through water, it has tessellation. The one in Master Chief Collection has no water tessellation... Why? Halo 3 on MCC has it, so why remove it in Halo 4?! Such a strange thing to remove. It might be that they could not properly port the tessellation code. They probably managed the Halo 3 tessellation since they have tried a PC port since 2012 or so, more time to port code.
I honestly dont see that much of a difference in the upgrades for halo 4. The graphics just got a bit shinier and the frame rates got a bit faster which is 2 things that give the best experiance. Overall the upgrades are pretty nicely improved for a game that already had good looks
With Halo 2 Anniversary there is a huge change. With Halo 3 they're isn't a change because they didn't make any changes to Halo 3 because it's not the 10 yr anniversary for that game yet.
TheSonicfanx1 Thats because its a simple port. The only differences is 1080p and 60fps. They never even attempted to improve the graphics, just the resolution and fps. Same with Halo 3. The only game that was remeastered for Xbox One was Halo 2 Anniversary, and like Halo 4 the rest are mere ports. Don't know why everyone is whining.
Still can't believe halo 4 runs on an xbox 360. Goes to show how much developers got out of that box. Shame they dont do that for the current generation.
Anything with an easy integer variable got turned up a bit. So the biggest difference I can see is they pushed out the LOD and mipmapping a little. Distant objects fade in a little sooner and are a little sharper and fade to their full model a little further out. Shadows and reflections are a higher resolution as well but that seems to be it. All effects are identical to 360 and the textures are seemingly identical as well. This is less work than the other "Not really remastered" titles got. In contrast Halo 3, ODST and Reach have all these really basic enhancements but in addition if you select Enhanced graphics they have lots of cleaned up or uncompressed textures AND some reworked effects to account for higher resolutions. Halo 4's textures and effects end up looking a little pixellated in comparison to the rest because of this. Shit even Halo 1 got its original graphics totally repaired and they even replaced some of the tetxures with uncompressed versions there too. Halo 4 clearly got the least work out of the group. Also, ALL games in the collection got fov adjustment, viewmodel centering, modern aiming, and motion interpolation for all animations so that's pretty rad.
Someone said that Halo 4 needs a remake. I told that guy that he was a funny idiot. For a game that came out in 2012, these graphics are still fucking GORGEOUS! Since Next Gen games already look photorealistic as it is, game remakes will be a thing of the past!!!
+Joshua Mitchell Very true, I dont think many ppl give Halo 4 the credit it deserves from visual perspective....it was one of the best looking games on Xbox 360, much the same like The Last of US was on PS3. I mean I dont think that even Halo Reach looks that bad, it still looks quite nice imo....the only games in the series that I would like to get remake, would be Halo 3 and ODST, cause now they are in many ways the inferior looking games in the franchise, especially Halo 3 with its facial graphics/expressions that looked ugly even back in 2007, but I can do without, I think that what MC collection offers on Xbox One is already enough.
+Balnazzardi I agree, man. Halo 4 is the kind of game that NEVER needs a remake at all. Halo 3 and ODST are the only games left that need it (I'd have no problem if there wasn't). However, if 343 are going to do it, they need to focus on JUST Halo 3. None of that collection bullshit. They bit off more than they could chew there.
![Halo 3 - The Master Chief Collection vs. Original Comparison [Full HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-kYfEsxXnaM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Halo 3 – The Master Chief Collection vs. Original Comparison [Full HD]](/img/tr.png)
![Evolution of Halo Games [2001-2023]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pG-1yTO4oqo/mqdefault.jpg)
I forgot how great this game actually originally looked for 2012
A few weeks back I showed my brother this game (the original) and he was astonished by how great it looked
Arkaus Wisegamchi Now imagine how halo 1 was beautiful in 2001
For me Halo 1 was totaly beatyfull and i was 9 as well back than... in some aspects it looked better than any other halo game (particel effects which bounce of the ground and other surfaces unlike in other halos where it just fly tough the ground).
tskwared667 crysis 3
+tskwared667 || " Imagine!! " *This* was PC Graphic Standart in like 2008. *; )*
Halo 4 isnt that dated and still looks freaking good on 360
+AnHonest Gamer Halo 4 is just a optmization miracle. The game is so fuckin' great and I still don't know how they could put those graphics in game.
+Icaro Morais Yeah, but unfortunately it only runs 30 fps. :(
Playful 66665 On 360. XO runs at 60fps.
+Icaro Morais I know.
after going back it looks extremely ugly, textures are so low res its unbelievable. unfortunately the only good thing in halo 4 was the campaign.
So, Xbox 360 only had like 1Gb RAM available for games and a 2007 processor (probably conceived 1 or 2 years before). How on Earth did they make Halo 4 look like that? pure optimization magic.
didnt it have around 500-700mbs of ram?
it rarely uses real time lighting, most of the lighting is just in the textures
+Leo Nemesis
512mb ram, 10mb ED Ram with special logic onboard to enabled 4xMSAA without loss.
3x 3.2ghz CPU cores with two threads each. And 48 "Clusters" of radeon cores.
yeah if they made halo look like that how does black ops 3 look so bad
Alexander Lewis
Simple. EA logic.
If the PS3/360 were still next-gen and they decided to re-release for PS2 and original Xbox for the hell of it, they would make damn sure it looked like some low-grade PS1 game instead.
Halo 4 I think had some of the finest graphics that the 360 had ever seen. I sometimes forget it was originally released on 7th Gen.
Halo 4 is still so beautiful. It was crazy to think that 343i could produce these graphics with hardware that was 8 years old! It still blows my mind. Halo 4 looks almost as good as current gen games.
@john wayne Halo reach started this Bullshit
@@minilla2382 how?
@@SamTWP let me give some reasons
1. it was the divisive game at launch
2. fucked up the lore
3. ruins the fall of reach book
4.added the damn return to the battlefield timer that goes to others fps games
5. it had armor abilities
6. had fucking bloom
7. killed Halo Esports for 5 long years until halo 5 revived it
Halo 4 is so good because it brings out chiefs emotional side while the other games he's been just a soldier Actually we did not know what he really is and halo 4 is Amazing because it is emotional and told better chiefs personality
@@minilla2382 reach, 4, and 5 are the best of the series, coming from someone who played CE on og xbox hardware.
Even to this day, these graphics still blow me away.. It's truly an incredibly good looking game !!
The original the graphics but not the resolution
***** The PC versions, yes... Console versions ? No..
***** That was my point :)
***** Halo CE: 8-10 hours.
Halo 2: 7 hours
Halo 3: 7 hours
Halo 4: 6 hours.
It mainly depends on which difficulty you play. If you're playing legendary, expect the length to be drastically longer :p
I was always someone who choice Heroic mode... feels right the most and in some halos it says thats how it should been :D
Halo 4 was the shortest for me :( and Halo 2 the longest... well it has the most levels.
Halo 4 is a beautiful game
We're the only ones here who speak English...hooray!
Gh0stx101 dont forget about me lol
And me :)
agree
Halo 2 is a beautiful game
I understand that it is just a remaster but..
I think that the game on the old Xbox 360, while the Xbox 360 is 10 years old, still looks quite good, even by the standards of today.
It shows how creative lightning and shader solutions combined with efficient geometry design can make great looking games. I can't wait to see what they'll be able to do with halo 5.
Halo 4 is 3 years old not 10
Julian Wisniewski You are right, my comment was badly written. I have changed it. :) Thanks for letting me know.
No problem anytime my friend.
Its not a remaster. Only Halo 1 and 2 were remastered. But I agree with what else you said.
Is not a remaster, just increase the resolution and framerate, but halo 2 and combat evolved are remastered
still on X360 looks awesome
+Kordon Well do you find any ps3 games looking that good?
+Olli Laine The Last Of Us, Beyond 2 Souls, God of War 3 all look better than this lol
+Ser Khan Not really.
n0v4 003 Hey, why do you have the same profile picture as me 😂😂
Ser Khan Nope, lol.
amazing work guys
@@tasherxx_ why are you replying to an 5yrs old comment
What are the chances ACVideos will reply back
@@tasherxx_ oh ok
Halo 4 wasnt remastered, halo 1 was 3 years ago, and halo 2 this year... Halo 3 and 4 isnt touched other than higher framerate and ress..
That's what I thought
it wasn't remade, but it was remastered. It runs in native 1080p on Xbox One as opposed to 720p on Xbox 360, and runs at 60 FPS instead of 30 FPS. Noticeable changes when you're actually playing it. Resolution increase makes it much sharper, but bigger thing in my opinion is the 60 FPS, everything is incredibly smooth now.
Jon Dunn Remastering is remaking it, updating it, is simply doing what they did with Halo 4... get your facts straight
Narvikboy "Remaster refers to quality enhancement of sound and/or picture to a previously existing recording" off wiki. They enhanced the picture quality to Halo 4, cleaned up textures, improved frame rate, its remastered. A remake is when they completely overhaul aspects of the game. Updating is taking the previous game and adding features to that previous game, not releasing a completely new version that is improved. Its why we see blue-rays of old movies are "digitally remastered". Now before you go all condescending on people at least know what you are talking about.
Jon Dunn Narvikboy REKT
Halo 4 blew me away when I got it on launch visually, and honestly it wasn’t near as bad as people say. It’s honestly a really good game and it holds up insanely well
I actually think Halo 4 looks better than 5.
@@grobestadtwurst2041 Same, just played 5 for the first time today on PC by the Forge app, I was really excited. I think it looks worse is because they tried going for a really futuristic look and probably changed the lighting engine into a dynamic one
I think Halo 4’s aesthetic was much better than 5’s. Everything looks too clean and plastic-y in Halo 5. That being said, Halo 5 did run at a consistent 1080p/60 FPS, while Halo 4 ran at 720p/30 FPS
This+High resolution textures(And tessellation)+real dynamic lighting+Higher draw distance= 8 generation game graphics.
Imagine that in the pc port OH YEAH.
I know this is a 2 year old comment, but it won't need real dynamic lighting if it already has great pre-compute ones, and for the rest of it, I think Halo Master Chief collection which now has Halo 4 is already doing that, if I'm not wrong, the Xbox One generation consoles and ahead are doing that too.
As a Sony Fanboy.... I gotta say.... the Xbox One did a decent job at making Halo 60 FPS and 1080p. c:
Quick piece of advice. If you want to comare 2 screens, don't flash them after each other, put them next to each other instead.
Humans have something caleld change blindness. The inability to see changes when images are rapidly swapped. Especially small changes, but in some cases this can cover even a person missing in a group foto. xd
quick piece of advice, don't comment on something with some help on a 1\2 year old video
Oh so just cause it's an older video doesnt mean you can critisise it?I'm sorry I was unaware of this unspoken rule of the universe.Ryan Swift
Don't worry mate. I've had twats like Ryan Swift for all intents and purposes telling me not to comment on videos simply because they're 'x' amount of time old. So needlessly antagonistic of them (or perhaps that's why they do it?).
Oh look a child has appeared. You seriously need to grow the fuck up. Anyway there was absolutely no point in this person wasting there time with this useless comment because the chances of them seeing it is slim and they also started doing it way before this person commented. So instead of attacking me for no absolute reason think about what I was talking about.
And here you are, wasting time on me.
you also seemed to feel the need to bash my comment even though you argued it was worthless due to the age of the video.
Stop contradicting yourself, than start talking.Ryan Swift
Today i just started to play and the nostalgy kicked in ... cannot wait for the whole collection to be completed. Great job and i highly appreciate your passion in doing this.
These were really decent graphics for the 360, graphics that still look amazing to this day. 343 did a great job with their first Halo game.
that's about all 343 did was a visual. game play and multi player suck compared to halo 2 match making and ranking system
+demonicxxx Halo 2 was generic... (IMO)
+KOgames no sir. halo 4 and 5 are generic. halo 2 revolutionized the industry
demonicxxx How exactly did halo 2 revolutionize the industry?
I was kidding and exaggerating dude.
its 2022 rn this game first came out 10 years ago, i feel so old lol
Thank god for being able to Google Translate comments...
You can easily tell the difference! Even then though halo 4 really pushed the Xbox 360, and looked stunning. But Halo 4 on XB1 just brings it to a whole new level!
I can't wait for the PC version! Gonna be magnificent!
I was just thinking the same thing!!!
its coming
That pc port is close.... So close, next week maybe
@@pablogenial123
I count days waiting for Halo 4 to arrive on MCC.
And it's here, woohoo
I like Chief's armor style in Halo 4 more, it just looks more realistic, nobody can change my mind.
Holy shit there's a lot of people in here who don't know the definition of the word "remaster", must've failed English class or never looked at a dictionary before
Put the quality of the video 1080(if possible) or 720 when reaching at 2:20
2:14 fucking Blue Angels right there man
Anscheinend verstehen hier viele Leute nicht, das das Hauptaugenmerk von der Halo Master Chief Collection auf Halo 2 liegt, da dieser Teil ja auch das "Anniversary-treatment" bekommen hat. Deshalb fallen die Verbesserungen bei den anderen Teilen natürlich verhältnismäßig geringer aus...
Meiner Meinung nach aber trotzdem deutlich sichtbar!
Halo 4 was already beautiful as it is. I still boot it from time to time just to admire the atmosphere, level design and cutscenes.
@Daddy Max Not really imo
@Daddy Max Ok buddy I said my opinion you said yours that's the end of it move on.
@Ricardo Milos the art style isn't terrible, in fact it's great, but what's bad about it is that it's a drastic change over the old halo games. When i first started playing halo i started with halo 4, and i thought it was great. but since the master chief collection came out on pc i played through reach, 1, 2, and 3. and now i can see why a lot of people disliked halo 4. going back to 4 after playing the earlier games, it just feels way too different.
Man, the difference is insane! I mean, I thought the res and FPS would barely change the look of the game, but it looks so much cleaner :o (watch in 1080p btw)
THIS is a remaster
Halo 1 and 2 were remakes
Im pretty sure those were remasters too (only the cinematics were remade) but idk
@Alex McDonald Yeah, thats what im saying
So basically: An uplift in resolution, jaggies went missing
Some if rare texture/level of detail uplifts.
Dynamic Shadow render distance is the same on both (Why? Take note to the shadow of the dead grunt)
Post processing/lighting/shader uplift
Shadow resolution/quality still the same.
Can't wait to download some graphical mods for H4 when it comes to PC sometime in the future.
In some locations I find this game more amusing to the eye than Halo 5
hey do you know if my xbox 360 stuff like stats level and gear would transfer over to the remastered?
@@yvehc as far as I know on mcc every stuff is already unlocked concerning the original Saga, apart from Reach, idk about the character level
While remastering does cover even the tiniest little changes, most people usually associate it with rather major overhauls like what happened with Homeworld. While Halo 4 was remastered, it seems a little too soon since the only real difference was slightly better resolution, smoother framerate, and some slight lighting improvements.
why do people expect a remake done 2 years after the original have huge changes?? lol i don't get it
why does RUclips allow people to have names this long? This is kind of ridiculous don't you think? Because it’s simply a mcc port
Its not remastered,just ported,the mcc only make the games run at a higger framerate and some ilumination details,but only halo ce and halo 2 were remastered
The ignorance is painful.. Improving the quality of the game is remastering it, pure and simple.
According to Wikipedia, the term remaster "... refers to enhancing the quality of the sound or of the image, or both, of previously created recordings, either audiophonic, cinematic, or videographic."
Every game in the MCC is a remastering because the image quality (frame rate, resolution, lighting) has been improved. "Remade" is a better term for the graphical changes to Halo CE and 2.
2019: original Halo 4 still looks great.
Despite a few minor tweaks, the game looks freaking beautiful, even by 360 standards! So many memories with it...
If you're going to do a comparison video, then put them side by side (split in half). Otherwise it gets very difficult to see the changes. Once just seems to have more fog then the other.
Halo 4 and Halo CE Anniversary were left practically untouched in MCC, but Halo 2 was completely remastered and Halo 3 received a slight upgrade.
imagine halo 4 anniversery
Halo 4 anniversary=real life
One that looks like real life
2022
It'll be like an Occulus projected onto the screen.
since halo 5 came out what about halo 5 anniversary
Does anyone know the name of the song from 0:13 to 3:50?
What happened with infinite? That looks worst then that
Infinite is open world. Takes up more resources. This isn't.
2:39
Did they change the textures of the marines to look more like halo 1-3 ?
You can clearly see different colors and visor and the chest piece.
There's not really a huge difference
It wasn't remastered it just runs better and looks slightly better
Halo 1 & 2 seem like the only ones that are remastered. Glad they didnt make us get the Remasters seperately major waste.
+Shannon Curry that's because 1 and 2 are the only remastered ones the rest just have better fps
+The Assassin I wish they remastered each one.
+Shannon Curry once it's been out 10 years it's remastered
Only 1/2 needed a remaster 3 could have used one but still looks pretty good
looks same to me on this video.. remastered version probably only has higher resolution and maybe 60fps?
I must say the original holds up really well :)
my first console was X360 and my first game was Halo 4, when i play it, i actually thought that it was real life, for 2012 was a very nice looking game
Graphics ain't matter as long as we could play this in PC!
Halo 4 may just get my nod as the most technically impressive game of the last gen: large play areas, superb AI, loads of particle effects, smooth/consistent frame-rate, gorgeous lighting, fantastic real-time cutscenes. The game just looked stunning! The only negative was the intrusive jaggies on some of the interior levels.
Halo 4 already looked great on Xbox360.
The only big difference is 60fps.
Gamers that are not "polygon counters" or obsessed with resolution can tell almost no defference between the Xbox360 version and the XboxOne.
I thought the intro was an add, and tried to skip it.
*sits back an thinks of fail*
That is the human technology . Very poor than your. Anyway prepare for the next war(Halo 5). We can win all wars just ... togheter,my Sangheili pal!
Technically not remastered halo 4... Just improved to 60fps
and 1080p which is a big improvement
2024 and those graphics are still looking really impresive
Only small differences....
God I want to play Halo 4 again. My roommate and I are currently marathoning Halo, we just started Halo 2.
The only big difference is it's 60 frames per second on the Master Chief collection
And the original is like 45 or 30 frames per second.
And that's the minor differences between 1080p and 720p 0:28
Can't wait to see this on PC, I LOVED halo 4, even though it looked like vanquish.
the background music touches my soul
2:57 i'm but how in the hell does your UI get more detailed on newer hardware??? It's the UI that shouldn't be messing with anything...
Nice to see they cleaned it up a little
Definitely noticeable. The colors seem a little fuller in the updated version.
Halo 4 looks like it came out in 2015-2016 instead of 2012. Pretty ahead of it's time, in my opinion
Ya know all the MCC ads is that everything is actually a bit smaller , everything is shinier and fresh oh and some minor tweaks on the hud
I wouldn’t call the mcc version a “remaster”, it’s more of a port to pc/newer consoles with slightly higher quality graphics.
Halo 4 still holds up. Very good looking. I really like the art style of halo 4 on some points. Like the lights and stuff
The remastered just looks more sharper, noticeably in the distance. And change of colours.
I wouldn't really expect a "remastered" Halo 4 to be anything special. It was already goddamn close to Xbox 1 levels of graphics. Shiny, crisp, clear, etc.
Well, nothing has changed much but I can tell a little difference. The edges are much sharper and less blurred, his visor is too less blurred and has more shine/reflection to it, but that's my opinion.
E.g. 5:41
I am a huge halo fan, too. When I first saw the graphic of Halo 4,the graphic of origin halo 4 is already very very very gorgeous,to think about it , it is only on xbox 360, ten more years old console.I think the graphic is at peak ,too.In my view the problem is only about resolution and frame on xbox one ,so just make it to 1080p and 60fps,is perfect.I think we should thanks halo team.Make classical halos all in 1080P and 60fps,it is an epic.
This isn't a "Remaster" of Halo 4, but a simple upgrade. The whole point of buying the collection is mainly for Halo 2 Anniversary, and all the multiplayer content. In this video it's fairly obvious that they kept the original textures from the 360 version, but the full resolution, and slightly increased shadowing detail on the XBOne version makes everything a little crisper and more realistic-looking.
Only a slight upgrade, yet Halo 4 was native 720p and the Halo 4 from HMCC is supposed to be 1080p, but I don't see much difference. Hopefully the frame rate is 60fps like it says and not 30fps.
Man halo 4 looked good.
If only the remastered Reach instead. That's a game that actually needs a remaster
Four years for the update of halo reach
I know the video is old, but You missed out on the lack of water physics in halo 4 MCC edition.
the writing on the floor in the pelican bay argues otherwise, in the original it's readable, but has slight pixel at ion, remastered it's crisp and clear just like small text in gtav
Just remember we are looking at halo 4 the game looked amazing on xbox 360
i didnt even realy see the diffrence. id still be stoked to play either one
The only difference I can see is there is some better texture quality and a more up to date rendering system when it comes to lighting/fx quality. I work with graphics and I have to really look to figure out the difference here.
I never had a xbox console (classic,360,one),but i have to say,this game is awesome,this is a real exclusive,good game to make xbox 360 become face to face with ps3 strenght than never. I dont have played any Halo´s game,i do not want to play this,but this game is Great.
It really doesn't matter because they look actually the same. It just looks like they've sharpened the texture, but H2A and CE was more of a remaster. :)
Just noticed the evolution of the helmet visor, to halo 5.
I love how many kids are crying over the fact that a remaster isn't a game that is graphically rebuilt from the ground up. Yes lately a lot of remastered titles have been, but that is not always the case. In general a remaster is just polished, ported, or a polished port. The term remaster does not mean that there has to be a huge graphics overhaul. Remaster simply means that improvements were made.
It's not remastered, the resolution has been increased and the lighting has been changed. 343i never used "Halo 4" and "remastered" in the same sentence, except for may with the addition of "not".
Halo 4 was the first FPS game I ever played. It has a special place
May I know the music in this video? It reminds me of a metroid game's music in a way. :)
When you play the original Halo 4 (Xbox 360 version) you'll notice; when driving or walking through water, it has tessellation. The one in Master Chief Collection has no water tessellation... Why? Halo 3 on MCC has it, so why remove it in Halo 4?!
Such a strange thing to remove. It might be that they could not properly port the tessellation code. They probably managed the Halo 3 tessellation since they have tried a PC port since 2012 or so, more time to port code.
damn the original looks so good today
I honestly dont see that much of a difference in the upgrades for halo 4. The graphics just got a bit shinier and the frame rates got a bit faster which is 2 things that give the best experiance. Overall the upgrades are pretty nicely improved for a game that already had good looks
with or without a remaster this game will ever have cool graphics
Halo 4 + oclusion ambiental = halo 4 remasterizado xdd
Only slight improvements here and there in regards to resolution change. Shame, I kind of expected it to have a...bigger change.
With Halo 2 Anniversary there is a huge change. With Halo 3 they're isn't a change because they didn't make any changes to Halo 3 because it's not the 10 yr anniversary for that game yet.
Halo Disciple
I know. Just talking about Halo 4, I thought the graphical difference between 360 and One would be greater.
TheSonicfanx1 To think that both version of halo 4 still only render shadows on corpses from five feet away. Five feet. Five fucking feet.
Jason Tsai
BWHAHAHA!!!
TheSonicfanx1
Thats because its a simple port. The only differences is 1080p and 60fps. They never even attempted to improve the graphics, just the resolution and fps. Same with Halo 3. The only game that was remeastered for Xbox One was Halo 2 Anniversary, and like Halo 4 the rest are mere ports. Don't know why everyone is whining.
The difference is much more noticeable on the console IMO. Also the X1 version appears to have a slightly different HUD to me.
Still can't believe halo 4 runs on an xbox 360. Goes to show how much developers got out of that box. Shame they dont do that for the current generation.
Is there a difference in graphics when purchasing Halo 4 standalone on steam vs getting it with the Halo: The Master Chief Collection
?
Wow it still looks great!
Anything with an easy integer variable got turned up a bit. So the biggest difference I can see is they pushed out the LOD and mipmapping a little. Distant objects fade in a little sooner and are a little sharper and fade to their full model a little further out. Shadows and reflections are a higher resolution as well but that seems to be it. All effects are identical to 360 and the textures are seemingly identical as well. This is less work than the other "Not really remastered" titles got.
In contrast Halo 3, ODST and Reach have all these really basic enhancements but in addition if you select Enhanced graphics they have lots of cleaned up or uncompressed textures AND some reworked effects to account for higher resolutions. Halo 4's textures and effects end up looking a little pixellated in comparison to the rest because of this. Shit even Halo 1 got its original graphics totally repaired and they even replaced some of the tetxures with uncompressed versions there too. Halo 4 clearly got the least work out of the group.
Also, ALL games in the collection got fov adjustment, viewmodel centering, modern aiming, and motion interpolation for all animations so that's pretty rad.
They only upgraded the resolution, to be expected. But I would have like a longer draw distance on the shadows.
Wrong, lighting changes and minor graphic changes
Derek Biz I failed to see any other changes
Lol the only difference is that one runs in 4K. It doesn't even come close to a remaster
There is a difference between Remaster and Remade
looks like some updated textures and resolution increases
Someone said that Halo 4 needs a remake. I told that guy that he was a funny idiot. For a game that came out in 2012, these graphics are still fucking GORGEOUS! Since Next Gen games already look photorealistic as it is, game remakes will be a thing of the past!!!
+Joshua Mitchell Very true, I dont think many ppl give Halo 4 the credit it deserves from visual perspective....it was one of the best looking games on Xbox 360, much the same like The Last of US was on PS3.
I mean I dont think that even Halo Reach looks that bad, it still looks quite nice imo....the only games in the series that I would like to get remake, would be Halo 3 and ODST, cause now they are in many ways the inferior looking games in the franchise, especially Halo 3 with its facial graphics/expressions that looked ugly even back in 2007, but I can do without, I think that what MC collection offers on Xbox One is already enough.
+Balnazzardi I agree, man. Halo 4 is the kind of game that NEVER needs a remake at all. Halo 3 and ODST are the only games left that need it (I'd have no problem if there wasn't). However, if 343 are going to do it, they need to focus on JUST Halo 3. None of that collection bullshit. They bit off more than they could chew there.
that off-center crosshair always makes me wanna throw up. how did fps degenerate so badly
Cool video :)