Why Your Deck Doesn't Click (It's Not Your Fault) | Commander | Magic: the Gathering
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 апр 2024
- Check out Part 1: • Your Deck is Lying to ...
Check out our decklists here: edhrec.com/articles/edhrecast...
Want access to exclusive content, the Challenge the Stats spreadsheet, EDHRECast Discord, and more? Support the cast on Patreon! / edhrecast
Title sequence by Daniel Woodling / MTG Explainers: bit.ly/3982yYa
Card images courtesy of Scryfall: scryfall.com/
Elevate by LiQWYD / liqwyd
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0
Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/liqwyd-elevate
Music promoted by Audio Library / nw 
Игры
Force of Will 1:15
Pact of negation 💧💧
Mental Misstep
I have a Boromir in the field
@@therealjeromeo4366 Freaking Boromir. My brother in arms
Misdirection: subscribe and like it yourself 🤓
I'm glad someone else recognized the lack of Ooze tribal. We need more big voices like this pointing that out.
Agreed! My "Ooze" kindred commander is Wort, the Raidmother. Which I love, Slime Against Humanity go brrrr, but she's not a slime, just slime-y
I recognize that my Mime-ooze deck is at a 3-4 in terms of power level, but I wanted to use my black oozes and it was my only avenue. I also run gates with a secret commander of Nine-Fingers and Maze’s End and you best believe…that really does not help the deck either. I know I could make a better Ooze deck if I removed all blue mana sources and just went green black, but the flip side is I could make a much better reanimator deck if I scrapped the ooze idea, so the deck just exists for playing against new players since I built it as a Sultai deck for the 32 deck challenge and already had Golgari and a reanimator deck.
@angelojohnson9441 mimeo can work but you are running self mill/reanimator and a bunch of oozes. I just think Oozes should get some actual kindred support. Now they seem pretty adamant about giving all the other creature types kindred support 🙄
Talk about Scorpion or even Centaur tribal support.
I see this a LOT. It's hard convincing a player their deck doesn't have the theme they think it does.
me trying to convince the Bruvac player that they're playing a combo deck and not a mill deck
@@kazko2563 Its both, or just one or the other, depending on how you build it :). If you include any of the 'mill half the library' cards, then its combo. If you include incrimental mill (on untap, landfall, upkeep, etc) its mill. If you include both, its both (that is where mine lives, personally). Can also be a control deck since its in blue, with a combo to win if you eschew all other mill and stock it full of draw, counterspells, and removal with just a couple of the combo finishers.
I think that is maybe one thing missing from this video: the idea that a deck (and/or commander) can have multiple identities at the same time.
And I just went and watched the Part 1 video, where he brings up the idea of decks being a combination of different identities / features. So... yeah, he's got it covered :)
It really is, this happens in way too much in casual and even in cEDH. Commander is such a difficult format to understand fully IMO.
this is why i always lean into a theme as much as possible. build for fun, play for win.
This isn't even limited to card designs, but actual mechanics. Flicker, bounce, and reanimation all seem like some form of evasion to diversify interaction, but in practice are just methods to trigger your own ETBs more.
You're right since it didn't even occur to me that those even *could* be evasion, but also... they're REALLY GOOD EVASION in a deck like Anikthea lmao. She has both an attack trigger and an ETB trigger, and doesn't require hitting the opponent to get the effect. I didn't even consider using those for that purpose, but I'll be damned if I'm passing up a 2 for 1 special like that
This is far from the intended purpose of the video, but it did further solidify my belief that optimizing a deck doesn't necessarily make it more fun. Sure, you can get infinite turns with Tivit and Time Seive, but to me the voting mechanic would be more fun, even if its objectively weaker.
I had a lot of issues with GU Elves in the Lord of the Rings precon. Ostensibly it threw in a few Scry elves and Big Mana wizards, but that deck is entirely an Elf Tribal + Voting deck. Since the Voting cards aren't that amazing on their own, nor are they consistent, many players cut them entirely. Galadriel (2GU), however, hit the target perfectly with voting, as did Cirdan (3GU), without being overpowered. I firmly believe now that you can include Galadriel (1GU), Erestor (1GU), Galadriel as commander, and Cirdan in the same deck with a minor Voting subtheme just fine, to add spice to your otherwise aggressive Elf deck.
As someone who knows another player with a Tivit deck, I can confirm your supposition.
I've encountered this problem as well in my current build process. I'm trying to cobble together Gyome, but without even actively intending for it to happen, my work-in-progress turned into a Sacrifice deck, and that bummed me out because I already have Elenda for that.
The solution presented itself to me when I reexamined my reason for building Gyome: I've become a pretty good home cook over the last few years, and I enjoy how the food I make and serve can nourish the soul as much as it can nourish the body. Translating the joy and power of a fine meal into game mechanics meant starting over the build process and leaning into the Lifegain theme, and even though I can see the deck is becoming objectively weaker, it is already becoming more fun, niche and unconventional.
Now I just have to win my internal struggle and not cram too many goodstuff cards into the pile... ^^°
Gyome's cooking can pull double duty, though.
With a pile of food, you can tap opposing creatures to make them unable to block. The food is so good they're full!
AND he's a 5/3 trample who can also munch on something in response to removal.
He can very much get there witj commander damage with minimal or sometimes no help.
If you already knew all that, props. And if you didn't, here ya go.
@@Magidex The bit about Gyome enjoying the benefits of his own cooking and smashing in for damage, yes. Force-feeding a banquet to tap down key enemy blockers, that I very much hadn't realized. Brilliant! Thanks a bunch!
You hit the nail on the head with Shelob. I built her as a spider tribal deck. But, the more you play with her, the more you realize...you wsnt more fight spells, and less boring spiders. I think i've found a good balance, but it still pulls me towards less spiders the more i play.
Vraska, The Silencer seems like a silent recognition that some players really only wanted Shelob for the steal/copy effect. With the lower cmc and treasure vs food making Vraska the "better" option for that strategy, it makes Shelob more compelling as a spider commander retroactively.
I tried to make a Shelob Maskwood Nexus "Things You Find in the Forest" deck (it's always spiders!), but it didn't play out the way I had hoped. When other people were doing "fair" creature-based strategies, Shelob could take over the game (and not in a fun way), but would struggle to keep up with other decks doing more degenerate things. Alas, I have yet to succeed in my Quest for the Jank(lord)
@@RadicalPrion Are you too stuck on a nightmare Plane?
@@brycehinson2005 unfortunately or fortunately no unlimited booster packs here
I tried spider tribal and even after changing commanders multiple times and play testing with my pod I could never get it to stick. Always too slow. I tried going wide and also just tried pumping. It feels like a hybrid of some spiders works along with other spells works best for this tribe
The "you are tapped out and cannot counter my call to action" bit was really funy u got me there🤣
Hidetsugu and Kairi are a really excellent example of this. I would imagine they were meant to be a spellslinger deck which accounts for 40 of the 1987 decks i see right now. But i started building it and was like "wow, how is this the best clone commander"
No, actually, how is this the best clone commander lol
This might be your best video yet, Joey! I love listening to you talk through some great EDH topics, and this was a very clever topic with a smart discussion. Very illuminating, thank you!
I think a big part of the problem is that when wizards print a commander for a niche deck type like spider tribal for example, the reward that the commander gives for playing spiders is underwhelming and just not viable for a lot of tables
My impression is more that they end up pushing it a bit too far or giving it too much generic value to the point you're less playing the tribe and more just using the tribe to enable that busted value. Anje Falkenrath as mentioned in the video is a good example, as it's meant to enable and reward playing Madness cards, but instead folks use those cards to just burn through their deck for the *actual* cards they want. It wouldn't matter if it was Madness or Arcane or Brushwags, you could put any qualifier on it and lead to the same result.
Giving all your spiders deathtouch means your fight spells will always trigger Shelob's ability!
Well the commander is an 8/8 so there's not many downsides in making IT fight instead of the 1/2 spider token
If the tribe is well-supported and the bonus is inconsequential, then the legend sits in the bulk box, because there's probably something better.
If the tribe is well-supported and the bonus is meaningful, then it heads up a ton of decks.
If the tribe is poorly supported and the bonus is inconsequential, then nobody remembers the card exists and it goes right to the bottom of the bulk bin.
If the tribe is poorly supported and the bonus is big enough to make up for that, it becomes a Changeling deck.
@@51gunner woe
Well said, Joey. The Kalamax bit hit home…. I just wanted to sling spells in Temur. Wish me luck with new Riku!
Let me know how it goes. I've been throwing together, and taking apart Temur storm ever since I saw Song of Creation. Never found a build that felt right.
Yeah, build Kalamax as instant tribal, focusing on combat tricks and interaction, turns out it will just go infinite all the time, deleting one player out of nowhere and I just really don’t like the deck, even though I LOVED the idea of temur spellslinging, instead of the overdone Izzet spellslinging.
Still weird that they didn't put the "once per turn" clause on Stella Lee since it's so prominent on cards in OTJ.
That's what the {t} is for. If you don't have an untap effect , it IS "once per turn".
The once per turn riders are mostly on crime related effects, since those are very easy to trigger
@@michaelsparks1571 I doubt that
Great thoughts Joey. This is why I tend towards commanders that are less popular, trying to make something unique and fun. It’s pretty cool when after a game another player tells you “Wow, what a neat deck idea.” Easier said than done, but I think the challenge is worth it.
I'm all about hipster decks (they have few registered decks, and I've never saw any of them at any LGS, but they do work and win) and faeries even if they are popular 🧚✨
This used to be what the format was mostly about. A rather limited number of legendary creatures that required a bit of creativity to build around.
Excellent deep dive on a very real problem, Joey! Chefs kiss.
2:25 "lets investigate"
*lays clue token on the desk 😂
I love the fact that the first two examples you named are decks I own. I didn't get to edit Stella Lee yet, but I'm pretty sure my Tivit desk is actually "politics & control" and not "blink & artifacts"
Omg, the Tivit conversation is word by word what I went through. I won the Esper Precon in a raffle, and wanted to build a voting deck around Tivit as soon I saw the card. Then, didn't really enjoy the 17 voting cards at the time available to Esper. So I went for Spark Double, Sakashimas and bunch of blink pieces. I omitted Time Sieve because it is stupid imo for a casual pod. (I play Tivit in cEDH as well, and there it is very close to the usual top16 lists-with Time Sieve and Thoracle Consult ofc.) Highlights in my casual Tivit list inclue Tezerret, Master of the Bridge, Kappa Cannoneer, Cyberdrive Awakener, Kitten, etc.
I mean... It's not that "casual" when you overabuse an ability that's already busted... You just avoided the obvious pieces but found a way to abuse the same way...
And here is another huge topic players always avoid to touch: overabuse of abilities while not being obvious, but it's still making it broken.
@@SilHbs yes it is, lol. A landfall deck that abuses landfall is still casual. An aggro artifact blink deck is still casual if its winning via the methods I’ve mentioned. It’s just highly synergistic and high power, still casual and not competitive. Casual isn’t only “chair typal”.
no time sieve?? BOOOOOOOORING
@@lokumo13it's casual, not competitive casual.
@@SilHbs I'm 90% sure the reason in those players don't want to out themselves.
As someone who has a few tetzin decks, the reason i feel it's so easy to storm off with him is because of the critical mass of good artifact support in jeskai colors. Other great artifact decks usually give up one or more colors like jhoira losing white's artifact protection/ recursion or osgir losing out on the decades of blue artifact support. Tetzin can run all the amazing artifact support cards while directly benefitting from them unlike other jeskai commanders before him (it?)
I have an Aurelia the Warleader deck, which is honestly a good classic Boros deck. However, I have a Helm of the Host in it (in case I encounter a very powerful strategy) I have been tempted to take the Helm out because it has that infinite theme and not many people like it. But then again, I need closers in my deck and my Playgroup keeps countering or path my Aurelia so... Yeah. It's hard to find a balance 😂😂😂
This is probably my favorite conversation that I have seen on magic analysis in a long while, Thank you.
Thanks for that site link. I found like 10+ combos for my tormod/sider deck by adding like 2 cards
Ashnod's Altar goes infinite with parallel lives and/or doubling season. Who knew?
So i used to have a Roon deck which was based around flicker, but i loved the fact that he could interact with other people's boards with his effect, so my aim was to build it as more of a control deck. In the end, I was too tempted by all the potential combos i could do, the deck became a combo deck with cards like Time Warp + Archaeomancer for infinite turns. However, I've recently built Roon in a way which i personally think the card was originally designed, he's not a voltron commander. He can attack, then tap because he has vigilance to remove a blocker, then trample through with his trample. It's certainly not optimal, but it's a really fun strategy to play
This was a really great vid! I've definitely also been victim to being excited about a perceived theme and then playing the deck out and being surprised that the pieces don't seem to actually synergize well together. Always love to learn and expand as a player with your insight!
Very awesome video. Nailed a very complex topic with simple words.
I think a perfect example of this is in the Lara Croft release from last year. On paper, she's a neat (and thematic) way to continuously recur and reanimate legendary lands and artifacts.
And then you start realizing that this requires you to get them in your graveyard in the first place, so now its a self mill deck instead. Then, since a lot of the more generically useful targets are equipment, well now its a voltron deck as well.
What a great video. Thanks for this. Gonna have a look at all my decks now.
magic players when they build a deck with infinates and it goes infinite
This was an awesome video, learned so much - thanks!
Fantastic video! 🤜
Great video! Words that needed said!
Interesting to see Tetzin called out as a potential storm deck. I actually built Tetzin with a bunch of double-faced artifacts and incubators, and I've never run into that kind of play pattern. But our playgroup is generally lower power (for example, we banned fast mana rocks, including Sol Ring). So that could be the difference.
Loved the call to action
Keep up the good work Joey.
I really appreciate you calling out the idea of uncapped triggers or activations. This is one of the *the biggest* issues I have with *all* of WotC design as I've gotten older and played, well, better games (better balanced, mostly). What I would want more than anything is a blanket rule added to the game saying you can only have 3 activations of an ability in a turn, ever; this is tracked with the card, across all zones. That would help fix some of the design issues. Not the issue of Jodah's first line saying "+X/+X" vs. "+1/+1", among other things, unfortunately.
I'm starting to think the most powerful word in Magic is "Whenever...". That always gets the brewers brewing: if thing happens, get reward. How can I make the reward happen as much as possible?
Not only did you get me with that nasty play at 1:15 but i'm genuinely hooked on your style of communication in this video, not over the top, but honest in your approach with what you intended and were hoping for, there is no means to misconstrued anything. I love it, lifetime subscriber earned.
Some Commanders are just too good at doing something, especially newer ones that have both the setup and the payoff as abilities, so you either end up trying to force a theme that's not the optimal for them and brewing a "weak" deck, or you go with the flow and build another Tivit.dec.
And what also sucks is that people will see your Stella, Yuriko, Winota, etc. deck and assume you're playing the "strong" version and act accordingly denying you the chance of having fun with your "weak" brew, out of fear of getting crushed instantly.
Ty for mentioning my two favorite guys, Mimeoplasm and Ghave!
As someone who has a Kalamax deck with no infinites, I appreciate this. I can't tell you how much I wish it didn't have that second paragraph so I could just play Fork and Twincast in my deck, or even less good cards like Refuse//Cooperate. But I can't play those cards without it being infinite, so there's a lot of potentially funny cards that I just can't make work because haha they go infinite by accident. I've also found a lot of commanders that I thought would be fun, and then when I go to build them I realize that no, the way you make this good is miserable or infinite or boring or not what I wanted to do. It's very rare that I can make a deck where the commander is pushing in a completely different direction.
The mindset also helps with things like threat assessment as well. It does provide some insight into certain strategies that you or your opponents are playing and the answers possible.
I have one of those rare non-combo Ghave deck, and you're right, it takes a lot of work. The main offenders are cards that generate extra mana off of things ghave care about (so counters, having creatures, creatures dying, creatures entering, sacrificing, the list goes on) but just to be on the safe side I also avoid any and all free sacrifice outlets and also anything that could go infinite with Ashnod's Altar (which I don't play, but it's an effective test of combo potential). It's a real fun deck to play, but it's a bit of a hassle to upgrade, every new card needs to fall into a very narrow synergy window
I would love to see a Rule 0 video of gameplay using some of the suggestions posted on EDHREC's previous videos. Such as Ezuri, Claw of Progress as a Boros commander and Kalemne in Simic colors. That would be a fun 'what if' topic to include alongside this discussion video!
My first ever commander deck and my introduction to MTG was an Avacyn The Purifier blink deck which with time turned into blink/burn
I did make a tivit deck and put in as many voting and voting related cards as possible. It still has so much value that its just really solid. I even took out time sieve/sideboard it for more powerful games.
Thank you for making this video!! I’ve had this exact feeling ever since I started playing EDH, and I just haven’t been able to put my finger in it. There are so many cool commanders I wanna build, but are just way too easily pulled in an entirely different direction than I want to go.
Wotc: PLEASE give commanders more restriction, it breeds creativity.
You hit the nail on the head man. Great video
Thats why I love open ended commanders, my favourite example is Xavier Sal, infested captain, he can focus on populating or proliferation. My route i took was populating and made the major theme cloning. Specifically cloning non-legendary copies of marit lage and i love playing it. Easily one of my favourite decks i own especially casting tempt with discovery and suckering one player into searching to get dark depths and thespian stage and now all the sudden i have 5 marit lages on board.
I'm so glad you brought up shelob! My experience in trying to build her is exactly what brought me to this video. I thought she was going to be a better spider commander than grafwidow, but that's just not what she wants to do...
I appreciate the Shelob discussion at the end there, just got her this week myself, and wanted to brew her. To be fair though, there's now a lower cmc version of her from Outlaws of Thunder Junction: Vraska.
I am a new player added an ancient silver dragon and Karlach into my Stella lee deck to focus on lots of tokens, and big hits.
My Veyran deck pretty much had that problem. I wanted a token based spellslinger deck, but she just ended up being better at stormy voltron every time. Why bother woth the token generators to swing in if she can do so unblockable or with trample.
Yeah, Veyran can get pretty gross. I had to take her out of my Narset, Enlightened Exile because Veyran is just too strong at times.
Love the video Joey!
Makes me think about how Scryfall and EDHREC have an opportunity to help tag the themes of not just commanders but the themes of the decks they commonly produce (already doing some of this already).
Taking it a step further it would be cool to see an intentionally designed commander discovery tool that helps players identify themes they want their deck to embody and the tools suggest commanders that fit those themes. All too often I see players in my play group reading every commander in a color identity and trying to interpret what that deck could be. Weeks later, hours of effort and their first outing with the deck they have that Brian Kibler moment you mentioned:)
There are a lot of commanders that look really synergistic on paper but the support is so, you either have the synergy or you lose. So you have to find ways to subvert the expected play patterns.
I play Xyris as a commander for a pile of combat tricks, with a few other creatures in the 99.
Some sorcery ramp, no mana dorks.
Usually on turn 5 I land him, and after passing to the next player, I start asking everyone how their hands are looking and if anyone wants to draw cards. Then I ask what they are willing to pay for those cards.
It's about 3 cards different from Salubrious Snail's Xyris deck list.
So accurate. I’ve been building Stella and the only difference between edh and cedh is the high dollar/proxy mana base. She just sneezes into infinite even when you’re trying to build her a different way
Don't put any spell that untap her and there's no more infinite. Of course now your deck is infinitely worse
Awesome video
One of these for me is yedora, grave gardener. I really love the thematic and idea of having creaturea become lands , but the deck feels likes its never too far from a combo
I love my very very linear "drake" Alandra, Sky Dreamer deck...
Great way to discuss this! I wish Ghave didn't immediately make me arch-enemy, I just want to play Abzan aristocrats man lol
Reminds me of my Tanazir Quandrix deck. It was Infect-themed.
The thing with Tivit is that you have to want to make a blink/infinite turns deck. It doesn't happen by accident like Ghave. Without Time Sieve, five artifact tokens are not worth the bother of a full blink package, and Tivit can create that stuff by attacking. It's hilariously broken beyond intention, sure. It's not something you misstep into.
Did you ever met a Tivit player that didn't put Expropriate in their deck?
"What typal cards do you play with until you combo out, or how much can you invest on efficiency and speed so you can combo out fast"... great video. Love these.
Regarding the final bit, "untap" and "enters the battlefield" are also routes to accidental bad designs (as most of the examples stated).
As I recently started playing MTG and I've noticed this quite a bit with potential commanders when I run a potential deck through my head with the most obvious pay to play (as intended?) but them run another potential deck focusing on another aspect of the commander through my head and come up with a potentially much better and effective deck.
Part of the issue in my book are commanders with very unique abilities. The lagoon mystic is a great example, nothing else does what he does and thus it's overtuned towards hyper competitive. More crossover in design space would help with this especially if it's spread a bit more thoughtfully across the color pile.
Another huge issue are commanders that do everything. One of my favorite decks is Sefris of the hidden realms, and it's also one of my best decks. Sefris makes the deck go off, but her ability requires me to do things to make it work. Many newer commanders are both the engine and the pay off which allows deck space to again, become hyper optimized.
Lastly, I need to adress the elephant in the room. Most cards are tuned for limited environments. This leads to many effects (suck as flicker and blink) being under costed. Then you have cards like dockside just running away with the format. I don't know how to fix this problem but it needs to be addressed for the long term health of the game.
PS:Prophet of kruphix is banned for good reason. I can think of dozens of other cards that should be added to the list because they are not fun and are suffocating. The current edh council seems very adverse to bans. This may need to change. Please, when making your decks think about how fun it is to play against as well.
This actually happened to me, with Mirri, Weatherlight Duelist. I had it in a modified cats precon for years before deciding to turn it into a cat deck using Mirri and Nacatl War-Pride, then it became how quick can I get my key pieces to win the game through combat instead of the fun cat deck I had for years.
one of your first videos i ever watched was your upping the average Ranar video because it was the first commander product i ever bought, and i was looking to upgrade it. one of the things you pointed out in that video was that, as you upgrade, you'll probably move away foretell cards because, although this is quite literally a foretell commander, it seems to be that blink spells are just much better at triggering his abilities and also giving more value
that's all i could think of as you were going over the Tivit design. i can definitely see that someone thought 'oh, just foretelling for free isn't enough, what if we got a spirit for exiling as well...' and probably not realising that there are just so many more ways to trigger that than foretell to the point that foretelling isn't actually all that impactful anymore
also i heard that Korvold was originally designed to work with sacrificing food, and i just laugh every time i hear that. i don't know how true it is, but it's hilarious how it's so much easier with so many other things lol
Yeah, on the example of "commander card that does work for not intended themes for me was the new Lavinia, Foil to conspiracy, which in theory is a clues deck, but can work as a oops all instants/flash or even control deck pretty easily, and I love the versatility of where she can sink mana into, I hope someday w has enough food support to make her a foods deck someday.
On the aspect of "using x commander that does not support at all a theme because no commander supports it" like the merfolks case, this reminded archeloos being an example again, being used for a turtles deck despite no synergy, which as a guy that wants to make a turtle deck, I wouldn't choose at all
As an Estrid Player that does have Chain Veil in his deck i actually find my winning combo to more often be some form of enchanted land with squirrel nest or Sunken Field. Also i have seen a lot of her stax stuff before but its such a rarity id call it more of a player discovery than a problem in design. Some commanders give too much of a good effect that it does lead to me thinking it is more of a design choce that lead to the corrupted identity.
Just had this issue with a new gonti, made some upgrade and thought it'll be cool when I cast spells to steal some things from my opponents. It didn't go the way I wanted too.
I love Tovolar because he's the right "i will help you but I'm not going to save you" level of power while also being very good at filling that tribal commander spot so you can figure out how you want to play your deck.
Currently making a Marneus Calgar token deck. However, I am fully planning to use his ability to combo with Watcher in the Water and Mirkwood Bats.
I feel like adding a rule to limit infinite combos to only have cards trigger 10 or X amount of times per turn. Still giving it a really good effect or combo to have but not completely broken because the lack of “once or (x) per turn”
I had a similar realization with my newest deck, Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer. I wanted to build a weird janky deck with blue inspired by the card Dream Halls. Deck is a control deck that can cast anything at instant speed thanks to looters. I have never been a control fan but the odd style of it has made the deck feel more interesting to me
I wonder if some of these will solve themselves as more support comes out. Like Tivit and Shelob, there aren't enough good themed cards to make it work & be exciting, but once there are, then players can choose better between the theme or the off-theme\combo route.
This is well timed, I just built a Tvit deck with a strong Sphinx theme, tossed in some blink bc it's and other Sphinx's ETB abilities are very strong and oops it became an artifact deck
Ha. Deflecting swat with my commander out doesn't need mana. Rekt
Commander is inherent a broken format and it only works if we all pretend if it isn't. Further combo's are not bad in its essence. Just dont make it too easy.
As a gamer designer I love this video.
With Tivit, perfect example of what I have coined the “if you give a mouse a cookie” principle
Commanders or decks that start one way but in order to do what you want to do, they go down a rabbit hole
So I was building personalised precons for new players, I built a nice cheap blink deck and then I wanted to build an artifact deck and I had Malakcor (the one that if 3x artifacts etb that turn make a golem) and the EDHrecs were... just blink cards :/ or golem kindred decks. Plus he wasn't popular enough to have deep deck filtering. I had to go to other commanders for example Urza prince of Kroog to build the artifact aggro deck, I wanted to build.
As someone who likes to design cards, I've designed a creature Vraska with two abilities; "Other creatures with deathtouch you control get +1/+0 and menace" and "When this creature enters the battlefield, for each player, destroy up to one target permanent they control. For each permanent destroyed this way, their controllers search their libraries for a basic land and put it on the battlefield tapped." The deathtouch buff is not massively impactful in most games, and the Assassin's Trophy effect on her ETB ends up being significantly more relevant even though she doesn't get blinks in her Green/Black color identity.
I made a shelob spider deck but i needed more cards so i added the golgari skeleton reanimator enchantment and added skeletons to it. Never even payed attention to shelobs second ability, she gives me all my spiders.
It took me a while to come to terms with some of my decks not being what i thought they were. I still to this day will tell people that my Arcades deck is a wall deck, when it's honestly just a Lab Man deck that runs walls to draw cards. the walls themselves are rarely important, minus the one or two that have important abilities.
I'm definitely guilty of this, I just started playing in January, the first deck I bought was Blood Rites from caverns of ixalan. The first cards I added to it were Sanguine Bond and Vito, Thorn of the Dusk Rose to combo with Exquisite Blood that came in the deck. It doesn't happen very often since It's not geared for that, it doesn't have a ton of draw or tutors, but the couple times that I get Exquisite Blood and either of the other two and instantly win whenever I deal damage or gain life has been pretty feels bad, ngl.
Holy crap, everything just clicked. I was wondering why my "upgraded" Isshin deck was doing worse than before and I totally went down the hole of "hey isshin needs stuff attacking, and artifact equipments would be great" and then I added all my swords ofs and other equipment and now its more equipment than attacking
Kalamax is extremely easy not to combo with, just don’t put copy instants in it lol. It’s a super fun spell slinger list if you do that.
Estrid combos easier than you think, the problem is that it only takes one card plus what the deck normally does. Displacer kitten, sanctum of eternity, and lithoform engine being examples.
As a ghave player, figuring out how to make an artistocrats ghave list without having a combo was a wild ride and way more effort than it should've
Oh Shigeki, how I wish RND leaned heavier into the mono-G reanimator instead of landfall.
"Tibor & Lumia" made me think - it cares about filling the board with Blue/Red Wizard and Spellslinging synergies to play a game of Quitich
I learnt fast.. its actually about granting Deathtouch to use Red/Blue cards for war crimes
I really wanted shelob to be a spiders deck. But its actually a fight spell deck
that call to action tapped out and can't counterspell earned a like from me
yeah, In terms of Ghave, I wanted my deck to have no infinites in it, and it has been insanely hard to actually ensure that I keep it that way as I have upgraded the Counter punch precon over the past 12 years
This happened to me when I first built Inalla. I didn't realize because I was so new to the game how many infinites Inalla in your command zone makes, so I had to cut them. I cut infinite anything, no infinite turns, no infinite tokens, no infinite damage. It's wizard tribal, it's efficient, it leverages the synergies between instants/sorceries and wizards and the long term value Inalla grants by ensuring your cards put in twice the effort. The win condition is to use wizard doublers to double the wizard damage dealers (Basalt Ravager, Prophet Titan, Ghitu Journeymage) (obviously the biggest strength it leverages is the un-removability of Inalla, which means opponents have to target other pieces (exile Basalt Ravager, destroy Kindred Discovery, attack so as to force blocks and removal rather than allowing me to sit tight and draw into my power pieces)
This happened a few times with me. My Inalla deck making wizard tokens on etb? My deck started out as trying to create as many wizard copies as possible and swing for game. But she could never win through combat damage at all. But the value I was generating was kinda nuts, and in the end, she kept going straight into control and finally spiraled into a combo deck (on accident I might add). So... Yeah
Yeah ok you got me, no green up for veil of summer.
I know I'm probably in the minority, but as I was building my Scarab God deck, I looked into a lot of other players decks to get ideas of what tended to be good in the deck, I noticed a lot of people running a zombie centric list to capitalize on his damage/scry ability. But I just decided to create a mill deck that isn't trying to mill out my opponents, but just give me a lot of great reanimate fodder.
Your convo with Rachel is exactly why I've been in a bit of a slump in deckbuilding. It feels like those commanders are pre-furnished houses, with its own preconceived style, no room for customization and self-expression. While I *can* put restrictions on myself, sometimes I just want to be inspired from something else and not have arbitrary rules.
That said, I hope wotc keeps experimenting; just maybe split some cards into two/three and share some text around. Lookin at you OTJ Kambal and Geralt
11:45 😂👍
I have a shelob deck and it just.. struggles. Ive made it fight orientated and it fights creatures well but then.. then what. How do you close out the game. I sit there AGES hoping to find something to draw into but there just isn't enough support for it I find.
Funny you bring up Chulain as "not an Adventure card" considering I started brewing the new Kellan around Adventures and put Chulain in as a backup commander. It's like we went full circle lmao