@@skeptics555 i dont really have any idea about this but i may do quick search in the future cuz i still want to do it (macbook pro + imac as display) *let me know if u found something about this
Fully agree. I switched form windows to my 5k imac. Loved it. Now not sure what to do as my 2014 gets slow. I can get the last intel imac for less than the studio display. But would miss on a M1 option I like.
@@haraldgraber2042 hey any idea with the iMac 27 2020 can I use a second monitor like the regular studio display. Or if this upcoming event they announce a new iMac 27 can I use my iMac 27 2020 like a second monitor. I’m sort of new to this
Studio display is identical to the display on the iMac 5k 27 2020 not the 2019 model, since apple uses a new connector and video chip controller inside the iMac 27 2020 (Powered by Apple T2 Chip).
Excellent comparison, thank you. I have the iMac 27 inch 2020 (mid-range) model. I don’t mind its large bezels; it was the only way Apple could have the very thin sides. I would prefer the height of the Studio Display. For me, as the iMac cannot of course be lowered, my line of sight has it that my eyes are not looking at the top of the display horizontally (or slightly lower), as is recommended. A good quality ergonomic seat cushion does however help. As for the iMac’s chin, I don’t mind that either given that the computer is built in. Finally, I have 128 gigabytes of (3rd party) RAM installed, which means I’ll be hanging onto my machine for hopefully a long time yet. Too expensive not to.
Great review. Thanks! It seems the Studio display is an expensive downgrade over the iMac 27 5K - I'll keep using my iMac for now, sorry to Apple: the Studio is not good enough for the money (you need to add the price of a MacStudio, Mini or MacBook to the display). I'd love to have a new setup, but I'm not in a hurry.
I just pulled the trigger on a new 2020 27" iMac in August. I got the highest end model with the highest end graphics card for graphic design and 3D modeling and rendering. Now I'm think I'm regretting not waiting. But then at the time I had no idea when or what was going to be the next high end machine. With that being said, it sounds like you're pretty content with still having a 27" iMac. My concern is what the lifespan of my machine will be now that Apple has transitioned from Intel to M1 Silicon. How long do you think Apple will continue to support my hardware configuration for OS updates? Did I make a mistake by not waiting? I know hindsight is 20/20.
Hi, Thanks for the awesome review. Regarding sound differences, hard to tell from the video, but seemed the iMac had a more lo-fi sound with more pronounced midrange - more of a triangular shaped EQ, in other words. And the Studio had little more bass, with less of a mid hump. Wondering if this might sound accurate as far as the EQ character?
Great video. I have an iMac 27 and wanted to find out what the studio display would look like. I am waiting for the mac studio to get updated to replace my iMac. Also hoping the studio display gets updated. ProMotion and OLED would be nice. Probably won't happen though. 😅
Current iMAC I am using version 5k (2020.12.22). I'm debating whether to buy a Studio Display 5K or LG 27MD5KL as a secondary monitor. Even though it is in Korea, the LG 27md5kl is not in stock. I was thinking about buying the LG 40WP95C, but since it has 140PPI, I'm worried because I think it will feel very different from the iMac 5k. If I buy a studio display, I plan to buy a Vesa mount for the nano texture, but I don't think it will be easy due to inventory issues. As many monitors are out of stock at the end of the year, I am concerned that a new model will be released in January next year. What monitor is best next to an iMac? I use Final Cut and Photoshop a lot and like a neat desk, so the studio display looks good, but I think the price is too expensive compared to the performance.
I am not sure what to do, myself. I am existing iMac27 user. Was going to upgrade to a new iMac27, but just discontinued.....Studio seems like a good fit, but the Studio monitor seems very pricey for what you get, and not sure what to do. Unfortunately, my existing iMac cannot adapted for use as the new monitor.
i feel like the price of the studio display is outrageous, because the old apple thunderbolt display was on 999. i also feel like apple should make a smaller version of the studio display, maybe like 24 inches.
Sadly this monitor below expectations so much ; 1) 27 inch : Even Apple Cinema Display launched up to 30 inch too in spite of launched years ago that it has to be minimum 32 inch. 2) 5k : It could be 6k same as Apple XDR but they almost imac 5k screen resolution. 3) 1.600 USD : Most of the users will not be willing to buy at this price just a monitor while still out there same size and featured ones much cheaper.
Increasing the size and resolution would drive up the price. This isn't a consumer display. It's a prosumer display hence why it was launched with the mac studio and comes with reference modes
@@chidorirasenganz I do not think that it is not prosumer. Apple launch a new monitor bigger screen and better resolution and much more reasonable price. That's all.
@@ErenTopcu It’s prosumer as I stated before because it carries the “Studio” branding which is in-between Pro and consumer lines. It’s a larger and higher quality screen than the 24in iMac and has reference modes. It’s not the Pro display replacement because it’s not a Pro product. It’s a step below. Depending on the reception of the Studio display, I could see a lower cost version with the panel from the 24in iMac. But that will likely be dimmer, lack the reference modes, lack stand options and have slower ports (5 gbs vs 10 gbs)
@@chidorirasenganz I evaluate it as standalone monitor and it is small , expensive and not having enough features. It is extremely wrong to compare new imac 24 inch. I hope Apple launches 32 / 6k imac and compensate this shit imac 5k screen.
@@ErenTopcu What’s shit about this monitor/panel? The only available comparable model is the LG which is worse in every way except price. It’s not small in size and the resolution can also allow for smaller elements on screen to still be readable vs a lower res screen like 4k. A Pro display size iMac isn’t happening. Pro display replacement yes but not another iMac. I compared the Studio Display to the 24in because one: people complain you can get a whole computer for less (ignoring that the base model has 2 less ports) and two: a cheaper consumer display would use the 24in panel and I noted the drawbacks it would have compared to the Studio
I am still deciding on whether to get (in this order) the Studio Display vs iMac M1 vs iMac 2020 5k. What do you guys think? They all look great. I checked them all out at Best Buy and all side by side and the only thing I noticed (display wise) was the size more or less...but then again, its like with the iMac M1, you get the newer chip but it's 24" vs iMac 2020 5k but also the studio display is a bit better than both of them but it's a monitor by itself and isn't like an all in one. This makes the decision tough seeing which one is best. Your thoughts? PS: I do have a Macbook Pro but I've always a bigger screen, whether it's an iMac or even using Apple's monitor(studio display).
What do you use your Mac for? For me video editing is a big deal and I need the best chip possible. The monitor can always be switched out and if it’s good enough for me to see what I’m editing, that will usually suffice but if you plan on using your Mac for video editing, I wouldn’t suggest getting an older model. I would try getting the best chip possible because that’s one thing that you can’t really switch out.
What did you end up getting? I’m thinking about buying a 2020 iMac i7 with 5500xt. Brand new, sealed on eBay, they’re $1599. Same price as the Studio Display…
@@bleds I ended up buying both 😂 I have the 2020 iMac i7 5700xt with 72gb ram and the studio display that hooks up to my M1 Pro MBP 14". I use them both. To be honest, if it's for that price and you don't have the M1 MBP or mac studio or mini, I would say the iMac is a great deal. Make sure to upgrade ram to 16gb or above. This one is a tricky one since it depends on your usage. If it's basic browsing and light gaming or light editing or 'creative' work, then iMac is a great deal since you're getting the whole package + it's a great price as of now. These are not obsolete by any means. If you already have a M1 type computer, I would just go studio display. Both are great options although I can see my M1 lasting longer. I plan on keeping these machines for at least 5 years. By that time, who knows, M6 or M7 will be out? lol Also just a heads up, the iMac does heat up and the fans are louder than I expected. Think of hearing a small vacuum cleaner or something similar or an air filter put on medium to high setting. If you don't mind it, then go for the iMac.
Bello il video!......Acquistando Mac Studio con M1 max potrei usare come monitor il mio iMac 27 pollici del dicembre 2013? ...se si, avrei degli inconvenienti? ...Grazie
sì avresti degli inconvenienti.. perchè il tuo imac 27 dovrebbe cmq essere acceso a livello hw (nn solo il monitor per capirsi ma anche tutto il resto). Questo a quanto capii a suo tempo..
Hi, I'm looking to buy an old used IMac 5K to use as a display for my Mac Studio. Do you think it will be a good choice? Since the price will be much lower. Are the pixel points the same between them?
The Studio display is the one of the worst Apple products to be released in a decade. Its an identical display, horrible webcam for a huge markup without a Mac inside. I hope Apple looks at their numbers and realise they need a larger iMac in their lineup ASAP.
Good review, but your webcam test is a joke. You only show a small picture on the iMac, which is barely affected by your gigantic photo light in the background, and on the Studio Display you zoom the picture almost fullscreen and the studio light pops into the camera. No wonder the picture looks so shitty. Not a good trick.
The only 27” 4k miniLED monitor that I know of is the ASUS PG27UQX and it’s $3k. I’m not saying the studio isn’t over priced but you aren’t going to get miniLED and 5k for what they are selling the studio for.
You are probably still comparing to $400 BenQ 27” 4k and cry why Apple is overcharging you. If you have to ask, it’s probably not for you. Why so angry. Get something else. Apple gave what people bitched for years now. Separated the monitor from the iMac and made Mac studio/Mac studio display. Now people complain why they didn’t get an imac27 😂😂😂
@@chidorirasenganz I suppose I'm just salty looking at it from the perspective that a month ago you could get a whole computer along with a 27" 5k display for a few hundred more in an iMac.
Hello, THANK YOU for this Video! As an iMac lover i am very SAD Apple discontinued the iMac! Sure a BAD strategy! Also sure ..... iMac will come BACK! Thousand People like ME will not get 2 Step back and buy a Studio Display AND an EXTERNAL macMini or Macbook! Never ...... thanX
Thank you for your support! I agree with you, the iMac was my first mac and ive had one ever since. I'm sure that a better version of the imac will be coming either end of this year or next, no way they totally get rid of it.
@@CallMeRabbitzUSVI agreed. Apple shouldn’t have taken away the target display mode functionality. Planned obsolescence in my view. Also, USVI as in US Virgin Islands? If so, big up. 🇻🇮🇻🇮
If only apple hadn't disabled the Target Display Mode on iMacs, then when the iMac 5k becomes the best option Today
I've read that feature went away because of software. Could an earlier mac os be used with the target feature?
Also, I would agree with the imac being the best option.
@@skeptics555 i dont really have any idea about this but i may do quick search in the future cuz i still want to do it (macbook pro + imac as display)
*let me know if u found something about this
@@TheTh3pro Did you, one year later? I can get a 5k for quite a good price!
At the very least Apple could've given the height adjustment feature at no extra cost. Really not happy not having a iMAC 27" upgrade.
I totally agree, I refuse to spend $400 on a hinge.
Fully agree. I switched form windows to my 5k imac. Loved it. Now not sure what to do as my 2014 gets slow. I can get the last intel imac for less than the studio display. But would miss on a M1 option I like.
@@haraldgraber2042 hey any idea with the iMac 27 2020 can I use a second monitor like the regular studio display. Or if this upcoming event they announce a new iMac 27 can I use my iMac 27 2020 like a second monitor. I’m sort of new to this
@@miguelnunez2415 Good question. Honestly I don‘t know for sure
Studio display is identical to the display on the iMac 5k 27 2020 not the 2019 model, since apple uses a new connector and video chip controller inside the iMac 27 2020 (Powered by Apple T2 Chip).
No
@@krigs6137explain
Excellent comparison, thank you. I have the iMac 27 inch 2020 (mid-range) model. I don’t mind its large bezels; it was the only way Apple could have the very thin sides. I would prefer the height of the Studio Display. For me, as the iMac cannot of course be lowered, my line of sight has it that my eyes are not looking at the top of the display horizontally (or slightly lower), as is recommended. A good quality ergonomic seat cushion does however help. As for the iMac’s chin, I don’t mind that either given that the computer is built in. Finally, I have 128 gigabytes of (3rd party) RAM installed, which means I’ll be hanging onto my machine for hopefully a long time yet. Too expensive not to.
Straight to the point. Amazing video
imac 5k 화면과 비교가 궁금했는데 이렇게 영상 올려주셔서 정말 감사드립니다. 건강하세요!
Great review. Thanks! It seems the Studio display is an expensive downgrade over the iMac 27 5K - I'll keep using my iMac for now, sorry to Apple: the Studio is not good enough for the money (you need to add the price of a MacStudio, Mini or MacBook to the display). I'd love to have a new setup, but I'm not in a hurry.
I just pulled the trigger on a new 2020 27" iMac in August. I got the highest end model with the highest end graphics card for graphic design and 3D modeling and rendering. Now I'm think I'm regretting not waiting. But then at the time I had no idea when or what was going to be the next high end machine. With that being said, it sounds like you're pretty content with still having a 27" iMac. My concern is what the lifespan of my machine will be now that Apple has transitioned from Intel to M1 Silicon. How long do you think Apple will continue to support my hardware configuration for OS updates? Did I make a mistake by not waiting? I know hindsight is 20/20.
@@AndrejStein I went with a refurbished M1 Mac mini and refurbished studio display and I’m happy with it
@@leev2463 Right on! I'm glad it's working out for you. I've been very happy with my Intel iMac.
@@AndrejStein I remember when Apple went from PowerPC to Intel. Def a transition is happening but you should be good for a few years at least.
@@dingdong5601 Thank you!
Thanks. Comparing both. Might buy the imac
Hi,
Thanks for the awesome review. Regarding sound differences, hard to tell from the video, but seemed the iMac had a more lo-fi sound with more pronounced midrange - more of a triangular shaped EQ, in other words. And the Studio had little more bass, with less of a mid hump. Wondering if this might sound accurate as far as the EQ character?
To me the iMac was louder but with less separation and higher highs. I preferred the studio for the clearer more balanced sound.
Great video. I have an iMac 27 and wanted to find out what the studio display would look like. I am waiting for the mac studio to get updated to replace my iMac. Also hoping the studio display gets updated. ProMotion and OLED would be nice. Probably won't happen though. 😅
Current iMAC
I am using version 5k (2020.12.22). I'm debating whether to buy a Studio Display 5K or LG 27MD5KL as a secondary monitor. Even though it is in Korea, the LG 27md5kl is not in stock. I was thinking about buying the LG 40WP95C, but since it has 140PPI, I'm worried because I think it will feel very different from the iMac 5k. If I buy a studio display, I plan to buy a Vesa mount for the nano texture, but I don't think it will be easy due to inventory issues. As many monitors are out of stock at the end of the year, I am concerned that a new model will be released in January next year.
What monitor is best next to an iMac?
I use Final Cut and Photoshop a lot and like a neat desk, so the studio display looks good, but I think the price is too expensive compared to the performance.
Studio Display is my vote. The LG looks similar but feels cheap, but just my opinion. A lot of people don't really mind it.
I am not sure what to do, myself. I am existing iMac27 user. Was going to upgrade to a new iMac27, but just discontinued.....Studio seems like a good fit, but the Studio monitor seems very pricey for what you get, and not sure what to do. Unfortunately, my existing iMac cannot adapted for use as the new monitor.
Don’t worry, apple is going to release imac very soon with 32 inch dont buy the studio display
@@samanwayphotography8376 10 months and waiting.
@@samanwayphotography8376 when...
i feel like the price of the studio display is outrageous, because the old apple thunderbolt display was on 999. i also feel like apple should make a smaller version of the studio display, maybe like 24 inches.
*subbed* much love from Vancouver Canada 🇨🇦 I love my 5k display and probably will get a studio as second display
the Imac is alway the better option, even better then the display and a macbook option.
Great video
(ps imac 5k means > monitor + computer *not only monitor)
Sadly this monitor below expectations so much ;
1) 27 inch : Even Apple Cinema Display launched up to 30 inch too in spite of launched years ago that it has to be minimum 32 inch.
2) 5k : It could be 6k same as Apple XDR but they almost imac 5k screen resolution.
3) 1.600 USD : Most of the users will not be willing to buy at this price just a monitor while still out there same size and featured ones much cheaper.
Increasing the size and resolution would drive up the price.
This isn't a consumer display. It's a prosumer display hence why it was launched with the mac studio and comes with reference modes
@@chidorirasenganz I do not think that it is not prosumer. Apple launch a new monitor bigger screen and better resolution and much more reasonable price. That's all.
@@ErenTopcu It’s prosumer as I stated before because it carries the “Studio” branding which is in-between Pro and consumer lines. It’s a larger and higher quality screen than the 24in iMac and has reference modes. It’s not the Pro display replacement because it’s not a Pro product. It’s a step below.
Depending on the reception of the Studio display, I could see a lower cost version with the panel from the 24in iMac. But that will likely be dimmer, lack the reference modes, lack stand options and have slower ports (5 gbs vs 10 gbs)
@@chidorirasenganz I evaluate it as standalone monitor and it is small , expensive and not having enough features. It is extremely wrong to compare new imac 24 inch. I hope Apple launches 32 / 6k imac and compensate this shit imac 5k screen.
@@ErenTopcu What’s shit about this monitor/panel? The only available comparable model is the LG which is worse in every way except price.
It’s not small in size and the resolution can also allow for smaller elements on screen to still be readable vs a lower res screen like 4k.
A Pro display size iMac isn’t happening. Pro display replacement yes but not another iMac.
I compared the Studio Display to the 24in because one: people complain you can get a whole computer for less (ignoring that the base model has 2 less ports) and two: a cheaper consumer display would use the 24in panel and I noted the drawbacks it would have compared to the Studio
I am still deciding on whether to get (in this order) the Studio Display vs iMac M1 vs iMac 2020 5k.
What do you guys think? They all look great. I checked them all out at Best Buy and all side by side and the only thing I noticed (display wise) was the size more or less...but then again, its like with the iMac M1, you get the newer chip but it's 24" vs iMac 2020 5k but also the studio display is a bit better than both of them but it's a monitor by itself and isn't like an all in one. This makes the decision tough seeing which one is best. Your thoughts?
PS: I do have a Macbook Pro but I've always a bigger screen, whether it's an iMac or even using Apple's monitor(studio display).
What do you use your Mac for? For me video editing is a big deal and I need the best chip possible. The monitor can always be switched out and if it’s good enough for me to see what I’m editing, that will usually suffice but if you plan on using your Mac for video editing, I wouldn’t suggest getting an older model. I would try getting the best chip possible because that’s one thing that you can’t really switch out.
Imac 2020 🎉
What did you end up getting? I’m thinking about buying a 2020 iMac i7 with 5500xt. Brand new, sealed on eBay, they’re $1599. Same price as the Studio Display…
@@bleds I ended up buying both 😂 I have the 2020 iMac i7 5700xt with 72gb ram and the studio display that hooks up to my M1 Pro MBP 14". I use them both. To be honest, if it's for that price and you don't have the M1 MBP or mac studio or mini, I would say the iMac is a great deal. Make sure to upgrade ram to 16gb or above.
This one is a tricky one since it depends on your usage. If it's basic browsing and light gaming or light editing or 'creative' work, then iMac is a great deal since you're getting the whole package + it's a great price as of now. These are not obsolete by any means.
If you already have a M1 type computer, I would just go studio display. Both are great options although I can see my M1 lasting longer. I plan on keeping these machines for at least 5 years. By that time, who knows, M6 or M7 will be out? lol
Also just a heads up, the iMac does heat up and the fans are louder than I expected. Think of hearing a small vacuum cleaner or something similar or an air filter put on medium to high setting. If you don't mind it, then go for the iMac.
Blasting a light straight at the webcams surely didn't help.
good video thanks
Bello il video!......Acquistando Mac Studio con M1 max potrei usare come monitor il mio iMac 27 pollici del dicembre 2013? ...se si, avrei degli inconvenienti? ...Grazie
sì avresti degli inconvenienti.. perchè il tuo imac 27 dovrebbe cmq essere acceso a livello hw (nn solo il monitor per capirsi ma anche tutto il resto). Questo a quanto capii a suo tempo..
I have both and feel like the picture quality is much better on my 2014 iMac 5K vs my new studio display. Not sure why but it just looks better.
Hi, I'm looking to buy an old used IMac 5K to use as a display for my Mac Studio. Do you think it will be a good choice? Since the price will be much lower. Are the pixel points the same between them?
@@cacotici How do you connect the two?
Is there a way to use the iMac as an external monitor for my MacBook Pro 16” 2019?
Idk
Use Luna to connect it
The Studio display is the one of the worst Apple products to be released in a decade. Its an identical display, horrible webcam for a huge markup without a Mac inside. I hope Apple looks at their numbers and realise they need a larger iMac in their lineup ASAP.
I think I still cant give up my iMac
What is this brightness comparison
same 😂
Good review, but your webcam test is a joke. You only show a small picture on the iMac, which is barely affected by your gigantic photo light in the background, and on the Studio Display you zoom the picture almost fullscreen and the studio light pops into the camera. No wonder the picture looks so shitty. Not a good trick.
Studio monitor for $1500 is an absolute rip off with no promotion or miniLED. Even $999 is barely competitive with all the other monitors out there.
The only 27” 4k miniLED monitor that I know of is the ASUS PG27UQX and it’s $3k. I’m not saying the studio isn’t over priced but you aren’t going to get miniLED and 5k for what they are selling the studio for.
You are probably still comparing to $400 BenQ 27” 4k and cry why Apple is overcharging you.
If you have to ask, it’s probably not for you. Why so angry. Get something else.
Apple gave what people bitched for years now.
Separated the monitor from the iMac and made Mac studio/Mac studio display.
Now people complain why they didn’t get an imac27 😂😂😂
@@RunForPeace-hk1cu exactly
The only other 5k monitor is 300$ cheaper. It also has worse build quality, slower ports, a dimmer display etc
@@chidorirasenganz I suppose I'm just salty looking at it from the perspective that a month ago you could get a whole computer along with a 27" 5k display for a few hundred more in an iMac.
do you think its still worth it to get a 2020 iMac today?
better no
I'm thinking about it. I'm a pc user looking to switch to mac and spending 1500 on the monitor itself just for 5k seems dumb.
The 2020 iMac is lighting fast on every day usage. I don’t think we need m1 imac
Look at Luke Miani video on converting an IMAC 27 inch to an external display
Studio Monitor is 600nits against 500 of the iMac.
Dam Apple fooled us
Hello, THANK YOU for this Video! As an iMac lover i am very SAD Apple discontinued the iMac! Sure a BAD strategy! Also sure ..... iMac will come BACK! Thousand People like ME will not get 2 Step back and buy a Studio Display AND an EXTERNAL macMini or Macbook! Never ......
thanX
Thank you for your support! I agree with you, the iMac was my first mac and ive had one ever since. I'm sure that a better version of the imac will be coming either end of this year or next, no way they totally get rid of it.
The iMac is attached to hardware that will stop receiving macOS someday whereas the studio display will live on much longer.
Pay apple tax so you can use the monitor for way past the expiry date of a iMac
If only apple hadn't disabled the Target Display Mode on iMacs, then when the iMac 5k becomes obsolete you can still use the monitor
@@CallMeRabbitzUSVI good guy u R right 9999%
@@CallMeRabbitzUSVI agreed. Apple shouldn’t have taken away the target display mode functionality. Planned obsolescence in my view. Also, USVI as in US Virgin Islands? If so, big up. 🇻🇮🇻🇮
@@CallMeRabbitzUSVI yea that's just greedy
The power cable is not removable.
Who cares
@@chidorirasenganz Hyena