The Longines Legend Diver Is Different...

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 окт 2024

Комментарии • 21

  • @triquivijate
    @triquivijate 11 месяцев назад

    I have the polished stainless version with no date. It's a superb looking watch, and despite its size, doesn't feel too heavy or overly big, compared to slightly smaller watches I own.

  • @GC2TEJJ
    @GC2TEJJ 2 года назад +4

    My Bronze Legend Diver is No-Date too, looks much better. The broze aging nice, with a very cool patina.

  • @edmundchiang
    @edmundchiang Год назад +1

    Great and rare review on this particular legend diver. May I know your wrist size?

  • @canadianwatchmonkey3992
    @canadianwatchmonkey3992 2 года назад +3

    Love your channel but to say vintage type dive watches are getting harder to find I feel is incorrect. Never in my watch collecting have I seen so many great vintage style divers. Just about every brand has a few.

    • @canadianwatchmonkey3992
      @canadianwatchmonkey3992 2 года назад

      @Harry Balls Price range?

    • @canadianwatchmonkey3992
      @canadianwatchmonkey3992 2 года назад

      @Harry Balls at that price point Look at the Glycine Combat Sub Christopher Ward has the C65 , Bulova Devil Diver but the best would be a minty used Seiko SKX . Go check out my RUclips channel I have lots of great videos there

  • @hussi405
    @hussi405 2 года назад +1

    Good Lume!! The one on my HydroConquest Chronograph is…lets say what it is: embarrassing
    Found your channel a few days ago, love it!
    Take care!

    • @antonhallergren588
      @antonhallergren588 2 года назад +2

      The Hydrconquest is a fashion watch through and through. There's nothing wrong with it but it sure as shit ain't a tool watch for diving. There's plenty of those watches on the market now I mean look at the Tudor black bays and omega smp300s. I like both those pieces as well as the hydrconquest but I'd never go wear them to dive in.

  • @csvd1
    @csvd1 Год назад

    Hi, what's the real thickness? on your measurement you said 12.4mm but to other videos with the vernier/caliper appears 13.4mm; also 13.4mm in few specs on internet.

    • @srbz1000
      @srbz1000 Год назад

      depends on the movement, newer model with new movement are slimmer I own the 2010 model and it is 13.4 newer ones are slimmer at 12.smth

    • @csvd1
      @csvd1 Год назад

      @@srbz1000 Thank you!

  • @edwards4409
    @edwards4409 2 месяца назад

    The lume is so disappointing like for what almost 2k? That should be a crime there are micro brands for 500 with the same amount of lume plots that actually shine

  • @Imadolphin983
    @Imadolphin983 9 месяцев назад

    That scale is worth 11.99 usd on Amazon which is ok, but when you say you trust that scale you are opening up a whole other can of worms. I would have just cut that part out in your review.

  • @muemue888
    @muemue888 Год назад

    i have the no date version muhahahah!!!

  • @verykeen2please
    @verykeen2please 2 года назад +3

    you never need a date on a diver

    • @Marco-ie2xn
      @Marco-ie2xn 2 года назад

      because nobody actually dives with a diver like this

    • @seventyandone
      @seventyandone 2 года назад

      True, but these days you wouldn't perform true diving with these watches anyway. I love the symetry on the no date version as well but the date gives this watch the versatility.

    • @antonhallergren588
      @antonhallergren588 2 года назад +2

      @@Marco-ie2xn the legend diver isn't that uncommon to be used as a diver. Main concern with a diving watch when you're gonna use it underwater though is lume. That's why Seiko and citizen are the most used brands for actual divers now.

    • @LlyleHunter
      @LlyleHunter Год назад

      You can dive and still use your watch as your everyday watch where you often need to look at the date.

  • @Arquelius
    @Arquelius 2 года назад +1

    sweeeet