At Sea Aboard Chevalier Paul - French Navy Horizon-class Air Defense Destroyer

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2017
  • Video Report: At Sea Aboard French Navy Air Defense Destroyer Chevalier Paul.
    The Horizon-class destroyers (classified as frigates in the French Navy) are multi-role surface combatants specialized in air defence. There are two vessels of this class in the French Navy, Forbin and Chevalier Paul both built by French shipyard DCNS (the vessels were launched in March 2005 and July 2006 respectively, and commissioned in 2008 and 2009).
    Read:
    Navy Recognition (Army Recognition Group)
    Global Defence & Security News
    Defense WebTV
    Online media covering Naval Forces, Defense Industry, Navy Technology, Maritime Security, Defense Exhibitions
    Marketing and advertising services for naval defense
    www.navyrecognition.com
    Contact: marketing@navyrecognition.com
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 130

  • @user-qc6fv4il2e
    @user-qc6fv4il2e 7 лет назад +28

    I wish Hellenic Navy had such a nice ship. Thanks a lot French Navy. Happy New Year

    • @user-ww7wz2gs4s
      @user-ww7wz2gs4s 5 лет назад +2

      oui merci , acheter plutôt une FREMM , une frégate multi mission alors que le chevalier paul ne fait que de la défense aérienne ! la FREMM fait out et elle est équipée d'un super SONAR CAPTAS 4 !!

    • @JoJo-vm8vk
      @JoJo-vm8vk 4 года назад

      @@user-ww7wz2gs4s Si le client le demande gentiment, suis sûr qu'il y a moyen de mettre un CAPTAS 4 sur une FDA 😉

    • @prodromospeios
      @prodromospeios 4 года назад

      If only friend...

    • @omineol9897
      @omineol9897 4 года назад +1

      don't worry if someone touch Greece we will fuck him up

    • @KRaikkonenSF
      @KRaikkonenSF 2 года назад

      @@user-ww7wz2gs4s Non il ne fait pas que ça puisqu'il a 2 canons 8 exocet et des torpilles... faut se renseigner XD

  • @Cartoonman154
    @Cartoonman154 7 лет назад +46

    Viva la France from UK.

    • @bigmike9128
      @bigmike9128 7 лет назад +5

      Cartoonman154 viva LA France from USA .😁

    • @blakon9311
      @blakon9311 5 лет назад +1

      Vive la France and not viva

    • @smal750
      @smal750 5 лет назад +2

      Vive uk great allié and super power 🇬🇧🇫🇷🇬🇧🇫🇷

  • @brianfoley4328
    @brianfoley4328 4 года назад +6

    Great video...a beautiful ship...impressive interview especially the fluency of English.

  • @thafunktapus
    @thafunktapus 5 лет назад +5

    Gratz to the French. Beautiful ship! Love it when our boats work together.

  • @arnaud2313
    @arnaud2313 4 года назад +1

    Très intéressant..! Et très beau bateau..!

  • @mkpoulsen
    @mkpoulsen 7 лет назад +1

    Thanks Xav ;-)

  • @jonquerettess
    @jonquerettess 4 года назад +6

    C'est très intéressant de voir le focus sur l'interoperabilité et la présence d'un naval warfare officier Britannique pendant 2 ans. C'est vraiment super. L'Europe de la défense se construit. Chaques pays sont tous capables de faire partie ou de prendre le commandemant d'une task force.
    Tout le monde a un super niveau en Anglais.
    Beau boulot!

  • @jodan4043
    @jodan4043 3 года назад +1

    Bravo enfin un officier de la Royale qui "speaks fluently" la langue de Shakespeare !

  • @Anolbea
    @Anolbea 7 лет назад

    Really great video video thanks.. I really laughed when the French captain said wafer 03:34 , its pathetic of me but it held a small amount of comedy value that made me chuckle.

    • @tvnshack
      @tvnshack 7 лет назад

      I guess he wanted to say "warfare" ! As we say in French : he's "Speaking Yogurt" ! At least, he didn't make grammar mistakes.

    • @nemesis1761
      @nemesis1761 6 лет назад +1

      Who cares ? English is just a world work tool now : everybody uses it, but nobody speaks it !

    • @ShinoxSturmreiterDesTode
      @ShinoxSturmreiterDesTode Год назад

      can you speak French? not because it's too hard for English peaple ,so don't be critic!

    • @Anolbea
      @Anolbea Год назад

      @@ShinoxSturmreiterDesTode French, Spanish, Catala and English. Chill out not intended as a criticism.

  • @jetlicuevas2155
    @jetlicuevas2155 4 года назад

    I hope i can them soon

  • @TheBasstemperature
    @TheBasstemperature 6 лет назад +3

    Oui l'anglais est bien une langue officielle a bord, car les opérations sont souvent dictées en anglais notamment par radio, c'est nécessaire pour une marine sensée être fortement intégrée dans un dispositif otanien déployant de grands groupes navales
    Résultat les français opèrent même a l'entrainement avec des ordres en anglais et des opérateurs se répondant en anglais, ce que j'ignore après c'est si c'est TOUT LE TEMP ou de manière alternante ?

    • @gnvchx7340
      @gnvchx7340 5 лет назад +1

      Nn tqt la c'est pour la vidéo mais en interne ils parlent français

    • @themax9913
      @themax9913 5 лет назад

      Je crois qu’ils alternent.

  • @lacombe2930
    @lacombe2930 4 года назад +2

    On ne comprend pas trop ce qu'ils disent quand même ^^ des sous-titres français peut-être pour comprendre notre armée ?

    • @azr2.0
      @azr2.0 3 года назад +5

      Franchement ils parlent lentement et ils articulent bien c'est facile à comprendre

    • @arthurbillot4317
      @arthurbillot4317 3 года назад +1

      Toujours à râler ;)

  • @bfa9446
    @bfa9446 6 лет назад +5

    Wow our guys are using english now...that's a major evolution for the French Navy ;)

  • @joelh3732
    @joelh3732 2 года назад

    Sympa et en version française ?

  • @regildorodriguesdeandrade2259
    @regildorodriguesdeandrade2259 6 лет назад

    Hello from Brasil, please answer me about the Horizon Class, is Frigate or Destroyer, tks and congratulations, greetings for all.

    • @mobylette3217
      @mobylette3217 6 лет назад +1

      Hi, in France they don't call destroyer as international say but Frigate DXXX (D for destroyer rang) or Frigate FXXX (F for frigate rang). So the equivalent is destroyer but in France destroyer class doesn't exist anymore.

    • @user-ww7wz2gs4s
      @user-ww7wz2gs4s 6 лет назад +2

      FREGATE = DESTROYER !! FREGATE in French and DESTROYER in English !!

    • @mobylette3217
      @mobylette3217 6 лет назад

      Nope, not all french frigate are destroyer only french frigate with the nato code beginning with the letter D. Endeed "Destroyer" is an english word that why they don't call the frigate Chevalier Paul (plate D621) as an destroyer but in NATO code it's like a destroyer rang. All coutries in NATO have to use the same designation model so the french choose to call their heavy frigate as destroyer. The french navy used to call them destroyer(or anti-torpedo) when they bought american ships (between 1943 and 1967).

    • @davidchampkin5999
      @davidchampkin5999 5 лет назад

      It's a destroyer ,but they class all their escort ships as frigates

    • @patlelion
      @patlelion Год назад

      It’s officially a frigate but international navy would call it a destroyer

  • @egateamnoob
    @egateamnoob 7 лет назад +5

    amazing , morocco should buy horizon-class or fremm freda frigate .

    • @MWcrazyhorse
      @MWcrazyhorse 6 лет назад

      We will trade it for haschiesh!

    • @user-ww7wz2gs4s
      @user-ww7wz2gs4s 6 лет назад

      FREMM is better ! multi role frigate !! horizon class is AA defense !!

    • @omineol9897
      @omineol9897 4 года назад

      We should buy zebi no?

  • @Pincer88
    @Pincer88 5 лет назад +2

    Beautiful ship, but why so little of them in the Marine? And why is there no CIWS against antiship missiles (Goalkeeper/Phalanx/Mantis or RAM) and the likes to be seen?

    • @arpansow3870
      @arpansow3870 5 лет назад

      There is some ciws missiles...see properly in the starting of the video.

    • @paultanton4307
      @paultanton4307 5 лет назад +3

      That's because all the Project Horizon partner nations cut their orders in half,probably due to the high costs involved.Even the RN cut their Type 45 buy from 12 to 6.Each Navy has its own Weapons fit which negates the need to fit a dedicated CIWS,the RN being the exception with two x Phalanx mounts.

    • @rocketassistedgoat1079
      @rocketassistedgoat1079 4 года назад

      See the pair of 76mm OTO Melara guns on the front? They're state of the art and can fire multi-fused, guided AA shells. Watch a RUclips video on them; don't need Phalanx, as this is doing the same job-but is more modern.

    • @marcofava
      @marcofava 3 года назад

      Mostly because FREEM can do 80% of what Horizon can do and is much cheaper, plus Horizon replacement is already being planned with a Displacement of 10.000 tonnes

    • @Tagadarealty
      @Tagadarealty 3 года назад +2

      French didnt have the "faith" in canon CIWS like the Phalanx, even if the RAPIDFIRE now exist and the 76 have a antimissile set, it's not his main role.
      So we use mainly the Mistral small range missile against Missile Threat and high efficacity decoy (IR/EM)
      I dont say it's a good thing...

  • @shabdikacharyya2516
    @shabdikacharyya2516 5 лет назад

    10:11 lol it has Horn

  • @ShinoxSturmreiterDesTode
    @ShinoxSturmreiterDesTode Год назад

    48 lanceurs verticaux (ASTER 15/30 + MdCN) + 2x 9 lanceurs latéraux (exocet) + 2 canons et mitrailleuses + 1 lance torpilles + un Caïman ? Putain ça rigole plus là!

  • @markusweissenbock6337
    @markusweissenbock6337 4 года назад

    Finally, a Frenchman speaks some other language then French :)

  • @hairustv
    @hairustv 6 лет назад +10

    Horizon class ....is good for indonesia navy .

  • @jagoan2000
    @jagoan2000 3 года назад

    Its a frigate or destroyer????

    • @chbl1881
      @chbl1881 3 года назад +1

      Well it's both, destroyer is how they are called in most navies but the French navy call them frigates, different names but same job.

    • @jmbig
      @jmbig 3 года назад

      @@chbl1881 Non, les destroyers sont plus gros et plus lourds que les frégates ...

    • @chbl1881
      @chbl1881 3 года назад

      @@jmbig cool les Français l'appel quand meme frigate

  • @sturgeonslaw9287
    @sturgeonslaw9287 7 лет назад +3

    Wait, what? In the intro the announcer clearly states that, at 7000 tons, this ship the the largest surface combatant in the French Navy. Shortly thereafter it is shown escorting the nuclear aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, which has a displacement in excess of 42,000 tons. Are we to assume that the carrier is NOT a surface combatant? How do the French define this?

    • @fidelio3841
      @fidelio3841 7 лет назад +8

      This is a little language ambiguity, yes a carrier is commonly classified as a surface combattant, but....
      What the announcer wanted to say is that the primary role of a carrier is to
      carry a fleet of planes or helicopters. Basically the role of a carrier is not to attack plane or other ships, but yes it will defend itself against such threats with a lot of missile, but this is not the primary role of a carrier.
      Frigates are more specifically designed to attack other vessels, planes, in this meaning 1st rank Frigate (if we use the NATO terminology) is "per se" a combattant ship.
      The "combattant" role of what you call "carrier" is specfically held by the on-board fleet of planes.
      There is just two way to understand the term "carrier"
      - you can first understand it as "global" so including the fleet of plane, so it is a combattant.
      - you can also understand it more strictly as only a carrier, in this case this is not specifically a combattant. Only the "context" can give element on what meaning should be.
      Just note that you could perfectly use a Carrier to carry civilian helicopters for example in an humanitarian scenario, or use a Carrier to carry all other kind of thing, so a carrier itself isn't "per se" a combattant vessel...
      "Groupe aéronaval" is the equivalent of CVBG (Carrier Vessel Battle Group), so it includes Carrier, planes, escort (frigates, submarines....)

    • @sturgeonslaw9287
      @sturgeonslaw9287 7 лет назад +1

      The fact remains a carrier is a surface ship, and with the use of its aircraft is one that can perform every task this frigate can, and can do these with greater power and at a greater distance too. Were the opposite true their roles would be reversed, and the carrier would be deployed to protect the frigate.
      That said, neither is the most powerful ship in the French Navy. This is the four Triomphant nuclear ballistic submarines . . . which are NOT surface ships, of course.

    • @jeanvaljean9293
      @jeanvaljean9293 6 лет назад

      the CdG isn't supposed to go in the front lines the plans it carries will.
      differences between French and nato names

    • @napoleonmeowparte3874
      @napoleonmeowparte3874 6 лет назад

      With women on board , i doubt there is any real discipline on board the destroyer

    • @kstorvik007
      @kstorvik007 6 лет назад +1

      Surface combatants include cruisers, destroyers, frigates, and corvettes, and several older types including battleships and battlecruisers.
      The category does not include aircraft carriers, amphibious assault ships, and mine hunters, as these generally do not use on-board weapons. Aircrafts are not defined as on-board weapons.

  • @lukeeclair7736
    @lukeeclair7736 7 лет назад +10

    Damn. Maybe a better all-rounder than the Type 45... :S

    • @Cartoonman154
      @Cartoonman154 7 лет назад

      I think they're looking at the Lockheed anti ship missile.

    • @sucellus5452
      @sucellus5452 7 лет назад +6

      beside it's an anti air defence destroyer with 48 aster long range SAM... there is also 8 exocet antiship missile, 8 sadral launcher short range sam and 2 torpedo launcher .. EXOCET you know the one that sink HMS shefield during falkland war... so they don't give a fuck of loockeed anti ship missile....

    • @lechevaliermalfet1
      @lechevaliermalfet1 5 лет назад

      well so far our type 45 having hard time just staying at sea.

    • @GI.Jared1984
      @GI.Jared1984 5 лет назад +1

      Type 45 is better at air Defense

    • @GI.Jared1984
      @GI.Jared1984 5 лет назад

      ​@@lechevaliermalfet1 They Fixed the engines

  • @raditya5663
    @raditya5663 2 года назад

    in 16th to 19th centuries maybe sound impossible for Royal Navy officer working aboard French warship.

  • @chrisf1585
    @chrisf1585 2 года назад +1

    Bonne mission avec le Cdg en méditerranée....

  • @fabienduval2618
    @fabienduval2618 4 года назад

    Franchement ont à un petit pays et pourtant ont à une très bonne marine et armés pour pour la taille de la France vive armé française.

  • @jahangirmollh6053
    @jahangirmollh6053 6 лет назад

    Frigate horizon class very good. Bangladesh going to make 6-8 frigate by Chinese Technology transfer.

  • @edwincauagas7674
    @edwincauagas7674 2 года назад

    Ok

  • @edsr164
    @edsr164 2 года назад

    Air Defense? I thought she was an anti-sub ship

  • @ftirgari
    @ftirgari 4 года назад

    Hypersonic missile...?

  • @servicekid7453
    @servicekid7453 2 года назад

    I’d still rather have a Type 45. SAMPSON is a much better radar

  • @challyho6375
    @challyho6375 4 года назад +2

    Pack some roast beef into a French baguette and you have quite the fighting force,but who are we fighting anyway 😕

  • @picardiebelleregion9508
    @picardiebelleregion9508 7 лет назад +2

    L'anglais est la Langue officielle de la France maintenant ?? .... Ceci dit, très belle vidéo, merci !

    • @themax9913
      @themax9913 5 лет назад +1

      Picardie Belle région en effet , c’est l’une des deux langues à bord car elle est nessecaire pour les opérations conjointes de l’OTAN ^*

    • @lheritieredumarteau6931
      @lheritieredumarteau6931 4 года назад +1

      @MrTherealpad Que certains de nos compatriotes sont cons.... Incroyable ! Et malgré la connerie de certains des nôtres, on arrive quand même à sortir des joyaux technologiques.... Amazing !

    • @rolandbihot7944
      @rolandbihot7944 3 года назад

      @@lheritieredumarteau6931 c'est par ce que les français sont toujours dans la critique qu'ils sont créateurs ils critiquent tout même quand c'est parfais , de la connerie française une qualité

    • @Tagadarealty
      @Tagadarealty 3 года назад

      C'est surprenant mais il existe des français intelligent capable d'utiliser plus que la seule langue française.
      Avoir un cerveau est utile, vraiment.

    • @picardiebelleregion9508
      @picardiebelleregion9508 3 года назад

      @@Tagadarealty C'est vrai que la langue française est un dialecte en voie d'extinction utilisé par les cons rétrogrades, les fachos vichistes et les conspirationnistes de tous poils ... j'avais oublié que les grands cerveaux pensaient cela, pardon de vous avoir choqué !

  • @KaratePath
    @KaratePath 3 года назад

    Forbin and Chavalier Paul are the 2 French Ships
    Andrea Doria and Caio Duilio are the 2 Italian Ships
    All are DESTROYERS, named Frigates for pollitical reasons, our people is stupid and don't like much strong armies. (I say to hell with that !!)
    I would love there were 8 of these ships, 4 for each country, instead of 4.

    • @Tagadarealty
      @Tagadarealty 3 года назад

      It's not really a political reason, it's more traditionnal.
      In all case, their NATO code are D for destroyer.

  • @Aze237
    @Aze237 7 лет назад +2

    MERDE ALORS ! NOUS NE SOMMES PLUS FRANCAIS !

    • @user-ww7wz2gs4s
      @user-ww7wz2gs4s 6 лет назад

      nous sommes Français mais pour l'inter opérabilité entre plusieurs forces militaires , comme l'otan , il est préférable d'adopter l'anglais pour que tout le monde se comprenne , si on ne s'entraine pas régulièrement à l'anglais , on perd cette langue rapidement !

    • @jpaulj9231
      @jpaulj9231 6 лет назад

      Ne vous inquiétez pas.Avec l'anglais qu'ils parlent on ne peut pas les confondre avec un Américain.

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 3 года назад

    post COVID-19 the MARINE Nationale needs atleast 2 large 63,000 ton - 90,000 ton stealth (CATOBAR) aircraft carrier with stealth features that will reduce it's RCS to that of a guided missile frigate . . . it'll be conventional powered, state-of-the-art iFuelCellΔ HYBRID marine propulsion system & not nuclear . . . each of the two carrier will have to be priced less than €9.0 Bn (one time acquisition costs) . . .

    • @servicekid7453
      @servicekid7453 2 года назад +1

      Well done you just specified at least two technologies that are not able to achieve your stated aims.
      Naval stealth is never going to reduce the RCS of a carrier to a ship 1/10 the size. And fuel cell technology is nowhere near advanced enough to provide sufficient power for a carrier of 60,000+ tons
      Very easy to demand things that are impossible to deliver, try again with a serious and credible suggestion

  • @maximeadam1621
    @maximeadam1621 2 года назад

    Des canon 76 mm cest extrêmement ridicule pour une armé comme la France

  • @brunodn9702
    @brunodn9702 6 лет назад

    Ouail, zis inegliche spokeun ouiz aohr bilovde franche acsent is terribeul, guaillze.

    • @user-ww7wz2gs4s
      @user-ww7wz2gs4s 6 лет назад +3

      l'importance est ou , de se comprendre ou de perdre son temps à critiquer l'accent , car de se coté , les anglais et les américains quand ils parlent en Français , c'est à chier !

    • @lheritieredumarteau6931
      @lheritieredumarteau6931 4 года назад

      @MrTherealpad Et dire que les anglo-saxons trouvent l'anglais parlé par les français "cute and romantic"
      Laissons les grincheux et les abrutis qui vivent encore au 19e siècle, se noyer dans leur connerie.... La France peut très bien avancer sans eux....

    • @JoJo-vm8vk
      @JoJo-vm8vk 4 года назад

      Va comprendre un Anglais de Liverpool, après on reparlera de notre accent. Il n'y a pas un seul accent Anglais lais des dizaines, comme pour le Français...

  • @RR-us2kp
    @RR-us2kp 4 года назад

    Biggest problem with this ship,
    France only has two. Come on France. What's wrong with you people

    • @RR-us2kp
      @RR-us2kp 4 года назад +1

      @MrTherealpad my point exactly. France needs to spend more on their own military rather than on NATO. Large part of the military budget goes to NATO.

    • @Lunat1K_Fr
      @Lunat1K_Fr 4 года назад

      We have ordered 8 FREMM, also 5 FDI which are also multi role classes

    • @kolerick
      @kolerick 4 года назад

      we don't take 1Trillon € loan a year to give 800 Billions € a year to the military... so, we are not dependent of the loaner as much as the USA is...
      United States of Debts

    • @Tagadarealty
      @Tagadarealty 3 года назад

      Their role is to escort the CVN, we have only 1 CVN, we dont need more than 2 of them, especially when 2 of our FREMM are also AA (FREMM DA, DA = Défense Aérienne/Aerial Defense)

  • @cassougharbi6284
    @cassougharbi6284 2 года назад

    Insupportable ce commentateur changez le !!! Il n’y a vraiment personne d’autre ??

  • @GI.Jared1984
    @GI.Jared1984 5 лет назад +1

    Not sure if i trust the French

    • @Tagadarealty
      @Tagadarealty 3 года назад +2

      Dont trust them, who cares about your feelings ?

    • @patlelion
      @patlelion Год назад +1

      Trust as an ally, I d better have them as ally than enemy that’s for sure

  • @MWcrazyhorse
    @MWcrazyhorse 6 лет назад +2

    They didn't surrender to Isis? Surprising. :-P

    • @grill38
      @grill38 5 лет назад +7

      Learn the respect for the dead, moron and stop making stupid jokes

    • @grill38
      @grill38 5 лет назад +5

      The military history of France encompasses an immense panorama of conflicts and struggles extending for more than 2,000 years across areas including modern France, Europe, and a variety of regions throughout the world.
      According to historian Niall Ferguson: "of the 125 major European wars fought since 1495, the French have participated in 50 - more than Austria (47) and England (43). Out of 168 battles fought since 387 BC, they have won 109, lost 49 and drawn 10."

    • @lheritieredumarteau6931
      @lheritieredumarteau6931 4 года назад

      @@grill38 Ah Ah Ah Ah This ass hole come from Zimbabwe !!!! Zimbabwe !!! This country have no army, no navy, no air force..... A ridiculous country....

    • @jmbig
      @jmbig Год назад +1

      Vietnam.... Irak ... Afghanistan ..... by the most powerful army in the world .... Victory ?? 😂😂😂