When I watch serious commentary, I don't like seeing comic snippets added in. It diminishes the subject matter as well as the deliverer's credibility, in my humble opinion.
There's absolutely no way that you can say that you've watched a plethora of documentaries, etc, and come away saying what you said in this video. Or not from an unbiased nature. I can already see that you're biased. You're not interested in the truth, you're interested in confirmation of what you want to believe. And you have the nerve, the unmitigated gall to put Jesus in this? SMH. How do you omit Furhman? You talk about Simpson and his history of domestic violence, but negate Furhmans history of being a racist that has admitted to planting evidence in the past. There's a myriad of information out there that proves Simpsons innocence. You obviously didn't look.
Furhman planting evidence does not make OJ innocent if he is guilty, though. NOT defending bad cops whatsoever--they make true justice that much harder to come by for everyone. But just because someone is trying to strengthen the case against a defendant by using dishonest practices, doesn't mean the person he's trying to get convicted is innocent of the crime. That said, the entire trial was a pathetic mess, and our legal system is a joke, and has been for a long time.
@proudmoon3 Very true. But our judicial system is set up to prove guilt, not innocence. I couldn't convict a person knowing that the way most daming evidence was found by a cop that had admitted to planting evidence on people in the past. And that another cop actually took Simpsons blood back to the crime scene. And that EDTA was found at the crime scene. How do you explain that? Why would Vanatter take Simpsons blood back to the crime scene when he could've just booked it there?
@proudmoon3 Another point is the timeline. Goldman clocked out at 9:50pm. He chatted with his boss for a few minutes and then left. The murders were said to have happened at around 10:15. Goldman went home, showered, changed his clothes, and ate a spinach salad before going to Brown-Simpsons house. Keep in mind this guy was a model and was going out to the most happening spot in Marina Del Rey at the time. I'd venture to guess he took a little time getting ready and ate. Definitely not 5-10 minutes. 20 minutes to do all he did is an extremely short window. Not to mention that Nicole's mother said she had spoken to her at around 10:50. Then later, she changed her statement to 9:50. Her phone records have been sealed. Why? I don't see how OJ Simpson could've committed those heinous acts and then have time to competently discard of the all the blood that would've been on him. The LAPD tested his pipes to see if they could find blood and didn't. So where did he clean himself? Chicago? Why wasn't there any blood in the limo? All of the forensic scientists said that the killer would have had blood all over him or them. Too many things just don't add up.
No doubt in my mind OJ was the killer
Lol and still they found him not guilty 😂😂😂
I don't get the laughing emogies
Same
When I watch serious commentary, I don't like seeing comic snippets added in. It diminishes the subject matter as well as the deliverer's credibility, in my humble opinion.
Very well presented!
OJ and charlie did it
HAHA THERE WAS NO CHARLIE! Ehrlich didn't even know OJ in 1994.
They meet 3 months prior don't be a idiot
Too much is too much, over engineering video editing I had to close my eyes so that I could hear your interesting message, ....
You didn't mention "racist cop" Fuhrman who pleaded the Fifth Amendment when asked if he planted evidence
He’d never mention this inconvenient truth. Poor Pastor is trying to grow his channel. That’s how you know he’s not a Christian.
There's absolutely no way that you can say that you've watched a plethora of documentaries, etc, and come away saying what you said in this video. Or not from an unbiased nature. I can already see that you're biased. You're not interested in the truth, you're interested in confirmation of what you want to believe. And you have the nerve, the unmitigated gall to put Jesus in this? SMH.
How do you omit Furhman? You talk about Simpson and his history of domestic violence, but negate Furhmans history of being a racist that has admitted to planting evidence in the past.
There's a myriad of information out there that proves Simpsons innocence. You obviously didn't look.
Furhman planting evidence does not make OJ innocent if he is guilty, though. NOT defending bad cops whatsoever--they make true justice that much harder to come by for everyone. But just because someone is trying to strengthen the case against a defendant by using dishonest practices, doesn't mean the person he's trying to get convicted is innocent of the crime. That said, the entire trial was a pathetic mess, and our legal system is a joke, and has been for a long time.
@proudmoon3 Very true. But our judicial system is set up to prove guilt, not innocence. I couldn't convict a person knowing that the way most daming evidence was found by a cop that had admitted to planting evidence on people in the past. And that another cop actually took Simpsons blood back to the crime scene. And that EDTA was found at the crime scene. How do you explain that? Why would Vanatter take Simpsons blood back to the crime scene when he could've just booked it there?
@proudmoon3 Another point is the timeline. Goldman clocked out at 9:50pm. He chatted with his boss for a few minutes and then left. The murders were said to have happened at around 10:15. Goldman went home, showered, changed his clothes, and ate a spinach salad before going to Brown-Simpsons house. Keep in mind this guy was a model and was going out to the most happening spot in Marina Del Rey at the time. I'd venture to guess he took a little time getting ready and ate. Definitely not 5-10 minutes. 20 minutes to do all he did is an extremely short window. Not to mention that Nicole's mother said she had spoken to her at around 10:50. Then later, she changed her statement to 9:50. Her phone records have been sealed. Why?
I don't see how OJ Simpson could've committed those heinous acts and then have time to competently discard of the all the blood that would've been on him. The LAPD tested his pipes to see if they could find blood and didn't. So where did he clean himself? Chicago? Why wasn't there any blood in the limo? All of the forensic scientists said that the killer would have had blood all over him or them. Too many things just don't add up.