hoi3 ai actually does more historical things than the hoi4 ai though hoi3 is dated, it does has better ai, i'd still rather stick with hoi4. besides greece in the corner kicking italian and bulgarian ass for a bit
i don't see hoi3 as dated. hoi4 on the other hand, is just an ahistorical sandbox with no difficulty at all true hoi3 isn't so hard either, the hardest part is micromanaging that requires patience
hoi3 is most certainly dated, its performance on newer devices is actually LOWER than hoi4. along with the game not having mod support anymore (well there is mods but workshop is easy to use and works well, and most of the mods there require dlc, of which I have none). And aren't sandboxes good? And the micromanaging is easy. Along with hoi3 confusing hq system I only found out recently. And their strange building system as well. Hoi4 manages to just replace all of these with more simpler and easier to understand to the point where you can understand it instantly, I only found out how to increase my IC in hoi3 in 15 hours of playtime. That is not good, maybe I didn't understand jack shit as I got hoi3 before hoi4 when hoi4 was already out. You are completely right about hoi4 being ahistorical, but thats cause the ai is shit, and the game was rushed.
no, it's ahistorical to pander to casuals who want to conquer the world as slovakia and don't need to think about resource management, or actual strategy. also, if it took you 15 hours to find out you can build factories like other things in production interface than im really sorry for you. Perhaps, if you were new to hoi franchise, it would had been a good idea to read the manual?
what fucking manual, there was none. and again, the game was RUSHED, its basically an early access game, they can still make it hard. and that whole not figuring out how to make IC was just an exaggeration, I do not remember when I figured out how to.
at the start they look pretty behind in technology and industry, but when factories get heated and start to pumping out infantry divisions, tanks, airplanes then strength in numbers prevails as the war progresses
@JL-CptAtom "The USSR was on hung more than a that propped up by the Jews ant the American War machine as a way to make money." - As a sentence makes absolutely zero sense, both in content, and grammar. The US was crucial in mobilizing the USSR's military, from late 1943 onwards, but in the crucial early war period (1941 and 1942), the Soviet Union was on its own and won.
America provided lots of food, supplies, aircraft, ships and weaponry to the British and the Soviet through Lendlease. Stalin himself gave a toast that "without american production, this war would have been lost". To be fair though WW2 was very much a team victory, the British blockaded Germany and stayed in the war, keeping Germany locked down from expanding its influence worldwide, the Soviet Union deserves alot of credit as they are the ones who truly destroyed the German Army and bled them dry despite terrible cost. Germany lost because they fought too many enemies at once, turned the conquered populations against them with their brutality and of course they didn't have enough oil.
6:11 You don't need 100 divisions to guard against Vichy France.
Better save than sorry
Hitler: how bout I do, anyway?
Vichy with like 3 divisions 😮
@@Baz_Human*loses in 1943
The AI just follow the history
no
Why didn't D-Day happen then.
@Nub Ogrodowy They barely fought anyone, if at all.
It's accurate the way it happens in HoI IV even if it shouldn't be under german control at all
No not really...where is the invasion of norway?
Also the Sowjets never fought in Italy
I got moscow i got leningrad. I was to the next province to stalingrad but supplies were.. shit and soviets came back
I told Stalin comrade to put 50divisions to defend Caucasus and he is coming to purge me
Одна французская провинция взбунтовалась ( 8:43 )
Германия: Отправить половину войск с восточного фронта на подавление этих опасных партизан
This game was so much better, than the casual 4th part!
hoi3 ai actually does more historical things than the hoi4 ai
though hoi3 is dated, it does has better ai, i'd still rather stick with hoi4.
besides greece in the corner kicking italian and bulgarian ass for a bit
i don't see hoi3 as dated. hoi4 on the other hand, is just an ahistorical sandbox with no difficulty at all
true hoi3 isn't so hard either, the hardest part is micromanaging that requires patience
hoi3 is most certainly dated, its performance on newer devices is actually LOWER than hoi4.
along with the game not having mod support anymore (well there is mods but workshop is easy to use and works well, and most of the mods there require dlc, of which I have none). And aren't sandboxes good? And the micromanaging is easy.
Along with hoi3 confusing hq system I only found out recently. And their strange building system as well. Hoi4 manages to just replace all of these with more simpler and easier to understand to the point where you can understand it instantly, I only found out how to increase my IC in hoi3 in 15 hours of playtime. That is not good, maybe I didn't understand jack shit as I got hoi3 before hoi4 when hoi4 was already out.
You are completely right about hoi4 being ahistorical, but thats cause the ai is shit, and the game was rushed.
no, it's ahistorical to pander to casuals who want to conquer the world as slovakia and don't need to think about resource management, or actual strategy.
also, if it took you 15 hours to find out you can build factories like other things in production interface than im really sorry for you. Perhaps, if you were new to hoi franchise, it would had been a good idea to read the manual?
what fucking manual, there was none.
and again, the game was RUSHED, its basically an early access game, they can still make it hard. and that whole not figuring out how to make IC was just an exaggeration, I do not remember when I figured out how to.
yeah they made the AI better but this comment was more than 1 year ago.
soviets op as hell
only KI vs KI
Bosse What is KI?
at the start they look pretty behind in technology and industry, but when factories get heated and start to pumping out infantry divisions, tanks, airplanes then strength in numbers prevails as the war progresses
@JL-CptAtom "The USSR was on hung more than a that propped up by the Jews ant the American War machine as a way to make money." - As a sentence makes absolutely zero sense, both in content, and grammar.
The US was crucial in mobilizing the USSR's military, from late 1943 onwards, but in the crucial early war period (1941 and 1942), the Soviet Union was on its own and won.
@JL-CptAtom lol what the fuck
Annex poland by German but free land :(Soviet)
Ностальгия
Brittain was just in time to liberate my country.
Where do you live?
China?
Mexico?
@@HELIX-ur5wy The Netherlands.
new to hoi3, took poland, france, hungary and czechoslovakia. im onto invading the soviets, wish me luck.
Just encircle and overrun and you gonna be ok
Ты б ещё с Великого Переселения Народов начал...
олд бат голд
Meʍeη†ō ʍō尺ί , гоу on πυςο.
грек, ну ты и кек.
Meʍeη†ō ʍō尺ί , на то я и эллин.
22 million army what you except?
Expect duh
b-but victory in europe wouldn't be possible without murrica?
NathanRomml no , from movies we now that they destroyed 99% of German , Russians did only 1% of the job
America provided lots of food, supplies, aircraft, ships and weaponry to the British and the Soviet through Lendlease. Stalin himself gave a toast that "without american production, this war would have been lost". To be fair though WW2 was very much a team victory, the British blockaded Germany and stayed in the war, keeping Germany locked down from expanding its influence worldwide, the Soviet Union deserves alot of credit as they are the ones who truly destroyed the German Army and bled them dry despite terrible cost. Germany lost because they fought too many enemies at once, turned the conquered populations against them with their brutality and of course they didn't have enough oil.
America only got involved because we saw that Germany was going to lose to the Soviets and didnt want to have all of Europe in Soviet hands.
DeepWoods no the Germans declared war on use after Pearl Harbor
@@williammoore6534 sure but lots of folks despite that didnt really want to do much in Europe
Wtf I thought allies land in Normandy
Stop Dumb it’s not exact history btw you should know since in this the soviets didn’t invade Poland in 1939
Irl yes
Is that hoi 3 lol so retro
Looks good
What is the name of the music that starts a 1:00
Go listen the HoI3 OST and you will find it XD
I like the game!
1943
There arent peace conferences in hoi3???
Hi
How do I set this up plz
Buy hoi3? I mean hoi4 exists so I don’t know why you’d want it but that’s how
Viva España (por si alguien me entiende)
sisas parce
Viva
All the time Switzerland's like 😐
было дело
How about showing all of europe
In old paradox games you couldn't zoom that far out
А хули то Британию нельзя сначала добить ??
This game is for maniacs
Nein.
You fucking nazi thats. A nazi word
Nothing more than Russian bias
Alex Figueroa it's an American game!
BIAS
@@majdaasee4744 It's Swedish
I didn't know that the Swedes liked the Russians that much
If the German AI didn't sort out their logistics then it's more surprising the Soviets didn't defeat them earlier.
Nothing more than German bias.
Viva España (por si alguien me entiende)
Viva España (por si alguien me entiende)
As a English speaker with Esperanto as their second language, I think you said:
long live Spain(in case somebody understands me)
@@universenerdd that is right
@@juangdo9220 I honestly don't see why I felt the need to say that. Added nothing to the conversation
@@universenerdd well, u practiced spanish so it was worth
@@juangdo9220 fair.