"No Country for Old Men" is a good example of films that make you think. There wasn't any music throughout the entire movie not even in the credits. Which really helped to absorb the atmosphere.
That is a great call out because of the Mandela Effect. No Country For Old Men has ZERO music but there is a feeling in your gut that tells you there was.
I thought about the same movie. But for different reasons. It's a movie (and a book) that sucks you in and you end up watching the whole thing if you caught it playing on the TV. Even if you have already watched it.
Came to the comment section to say, or see, this exact counterpoint. (I was actually kinda surprised that this wasn’t *THE* top comment in the first place!)
DeepVibes lmao for real.. it's like these idiots forget that EVERYONE GETS OLD lol. Like yeah there's a lot of celebs who look great for their age but how many of them shove needles and shit into their face. Look at Sandra Bullock who admitted to putting baby dicks on her face skin to keep it younger LOL.
Drive, No Country For Old Men, Nebraska are some that instantly come to mind. I dont think they are wrong that its not common but its not impossible for them to be huge hits or critically praised.
The fact that it had no music totally set the mood, in a way that it was just extremely tense. It made an unfamiliar situation feel real and uneasy. Amazing in my opinion
@@VividFilmProductions thing is, marketing is so costly, often being nearly as much as production costs. Mainstream films tend to have a marketing budget upwards of $100 million. You do get some movies getting free marketing through word of mouth, but it's often rare.
@@heavystorm1614 Marketing on average is over double the cost of production.Its a slimy side of the industry.Very closed door kind of shit.Production heads and board members basically hand picking what they want pushed and trashing good films to have a limited release or arthouse run at most.Fuckin shameful cause there are some seriously good films out there.
@@douglasfreckman8190 Yeah, I agree. I will say, there are great art house/indie/non-mainstream movies out there and they aren't hard to find. The most we can do is pay to watch them, and show our intent/desire to watch more films like that. Parasite and The Lighthouse have been my favourites of the year so far. The festival circuit does great for the smaller movies. Starting from Cannes all the way through to Tiff, the lineups never disappoint. However, you're just never going to get those movies to make 500 mil - 1 billion dollars as consistently as the typical 'blockbuster.' It is sad that so many screens are devoted to those movies. I know some studios demand most, if not all screens, opening day/week for flagship pictures...
That's a throw away line from Joe he hasn't actually thought about. Silence or lack of communication is used regularly in films across the board. What's the Viking film starring Mads Mikkelsen? How much talking was in that? Bugger all, great movie though. Edit: Valhalla rising.
@@fredsmith-kingofthelunatic7810 It identifies a major gap in this topic, and Rogan's question, that no one ever really admits because it throw the question back at itself: The types of movies are still being made, it's just not as many people (or at least the same type of people as before) are watching them.
As Quentin Tarantino once said; "the 70's years were the greatest time of American movies ever", today the world of cinema is in a sort of crisis where Superheroes's movies are dominating the industry especially, Marvel's. Fortunately, Tarantino or the own Scorsese have been the directors who have kept cinema alive.
Not to mention films like Whiplash, Birdman, The Lighthouse, The Master (pretty much all of PTA's catalogue for that matter), and hundreds of other beautiful works of art being constantly released
@@kinhamid9665 Man you can't name hundreds of other beautiful works of art constantly released. When you only mentioned four and the last one is from almost ten years ago.
I don't like the overuse of special effects. I feel like for directors of the past, they had to be creative to explore their ideas. Nolan and Tarantino are one of the few directors to build elaborate props for their movies and using minor CGI to clean up the scene.
The Godfather was probably one of the most perfect movies ever made. Dialog that was clear and not muffled, concise editing that needed no more or less footage.
The reason they don't make movies like the 70s is pretty much because of one movie, Heaven's Gate. It was a western from the guy who made The Deer Hunter. In the 70s, directors were allowed pretty much total control of their movies, the studios had faith in them. During Heaven's Gate, the director demanded more and more money, and kept going over schedule. The movie was a total box office bomb, and resulted in studios going back to strictly controlling movies during the 80s to focus on cash and not on the art. Reading about Heaven's Gate is fascinating.
Was thinking Heavens Gate as soon as Joe asked the question and kept waotong for Ed to mention it. Really was sorta Ciminos fault (along with a few other movies)
Exactly. Hollywood has never been artistic and only a few of the truly great directors such as Francis Coopola Ford, Martin Scorsese and a few others of that elite rank has made films that can be considered art. The rest of Hollywood is mostly entertainment escapism
nathan wallace that’s just false. I work in the film industry. The trend towards blockbusters is quite recent. For most of the history of film, Hollywood produced films of artistic merit along with the money making crowd pleasers. Sony Classic Pictures is Sony’s arthouse Wing and still produces some of the greatest art films of the day. Until the Disney Merger the same was true of 20th century Fox and Fox Searchlight. Additionally. Scorsese didn’t start out making big budget Hollywood films. They started out making art films and built their reputation. Some of the greatest directors today make arthouse films along with big budget films. Alfonso Cuaron, Alejandro Inarritu, etc all make Hollywood films, art films, and Hollywood art films.
@@theindiediary5950 Same here, I'm famous for liking what my friends consider slow, boring movies, but I never quite got interested enough in the Godfather to bother trying any of the sequels.
The godfather 1 and 2 are definately top 5 cinematic experiences of all time. Doesn't matter how they portrayed the Italian mob. That's not what makes the movies great. It's the intense story telling.. brilliant music filming everything was just masterclass with those movies. Number 3 was a great movie in its own right but compared to the first 2 it's child's play to be honest
Korean movies these days are like Hollywood in the 70's. It's commercially successful but they're still making real art and directors have real stories to tell.
@@iliveinsideyourhouse3943 Legit really korean movies are like hollywood movies in the 70’s? THEN THATS GOLDEN!!!!! I WANT UR RECOMMENDATIONS THE GENRES I LIKE ARE Crime Horror Sports-Boxing Drama Thriller Yh basically that
@@samirhamzah5245 Korean films: My Sassy Girl - Romance The Chaser - Thriller I Saw The Devil - Thriller Parasite - Comedy The Handmaiden - Erotic Thriller The Wailing - Mystery Horror Train To Busan - Horror Snowpiercer - Sci-Fi The Host - Horror Comedy Mother - Drama Mystery On Your Wedding Day - Comedy Drama Burning - Thriller Minari - Drama Thirst - Horror Joint Security Area - Drama Lady Vengeance - Thriller I'm A Cyborg And That's Okay - Comedy Okja - Comedy Memories Of Murder - Mystery Thriller Crime The Good, The Bad, and The Weird - Comedy The Flu - Thriller A Tale Of Two Sisters - Horror A Bittersweet Life - Drama
Todd Phillips would be cool after joker, pretty rare to have a director make one of the best comedies and one of the best dramas of their generation. Also Martin Scorsese. The most interesting one I could imagine would probably be Stanley Kubrick though
@alex lu it's a joke. Because Clint Eastwood is badass in his movies, Gorillaz even made a song named Clint Eastwood. I think there are cultural differences if you don't understand. Satire.
Norton’s smart and old school enough to understand what the real reason is behind why movies like those in the 80s-90s aren’t made anymore but understands that if he does dare utter his TRUE opinion, he will be shunned and probably permanently for life from any acting and roles. Art, which movies like The Godfather, Alien(s), No Country for Old Men, Full Metal Jacket, Fight Club and beyond are, cannot have a “politically correct point system” to satisfy. Movies made in the years 1960-2010ish were amazing because the freedom to create a story without any afterthought of which of the now 900 groups it may offend was there which allowed both the directors/writers and the actors to write, make, and act out movies without anything held back and with the story and cinematic quality being the main focus. Now, literally EVERYTHING is ALL about appeasing the left. Marxism has taken over everything from Hollywood to academia to social media to congress, and as usual, Marxism destroys and sucks the life out of everything it touches. - Ex Soviet Union citizen now living in the U.S who knows a thing or two about life under totalitarian control.
I remember watching Fight Club and turning it off after 30 mins for being slow. I watched it again and to this date I name it as my favorite movie. These movies are not for everyone but if done correctly they can be some of the greatest movies of all time.
RUclips and social media is to blame. People seem to not be able to take their time with anything anymore, everything has to be digested in 2 minutes because it can.
Absolutely. I took a class about this very thing at uni and it's quite shocking how much films are tailored to sell the most tickets possible. Even adding a few swear words in just to make it pg13 (Which is the most popular rating)
The decade from 1967 to 1977 has been called Hollywood's second golden age. So many classics. This was when the big studios were making expensive flops and suddenly an inexpensive little film called Easy Rider made a fortune. Cleared the way for young filmmakers like Coppola, Scorcese, DePalma, Lucas, and many others to make films without much interference from the studios. Bonnie and Clyde, The Graduate, Midnight Cowboy, Deliverance, French Connection, Network, The Exorcist, Godfather one and two, Taxi Driver, Jaws, Rocky, Chinatown, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Dog Day Afternoon, Carrie, Apocalypse Now, American Graffiti, Annie Hall-- it's a long list. I doubt you could cite a better decade; also these were all made by major studios, not scrappy little independents trying to do something original. Now the best stuff is being done for streaming services and TV.
And then came Spielberg and Jaws and Lucas and Star Wars. Big, exciting movies that made huge profits. And that's the answer: Blockbusters can make huge profits.
All of you above are incorrect and Greco (OP) is spot on. Norton understands that left wing Marxist ideas have permeated everything from Hollywood and beyond but gets that if he dares speak out the truth, he will be shunned and ostracized probably for life which means no more acting and money. I don’t blame him..
I’ve literally noticed my whole life that the year 99 spawned some of the best movies. Fight club, the matrix, American beauty, the boondock saints, sixth sense, Detroit rock city, girl interrupted, jawbreaker (lol), ghost dog, the hurricane, man on the moon etc etc
When i watched The Revenant to my point of view it was a disappointing. DiCaprio shouldn't have win that oscar for a movie where he is crawling and and saying nothing ,The Revenant was mediocre in comparison with other movies (where he really deserved ) , but hey it was a good movie in comparrison with Pixels , Terminator Genisys or Fantastic four or Star Wars:The Force Awakens it was good enough. But movies like inside out ,the martian ,Ex Machina,the walk are much more memorable and fun to watch, well at least The Revenant tried to do something fresh but it is overrated
It was good for like an hour and a half or 2 hours, but the ending was HORRIBLE, GOD AWFUL and single handedly ruined the whole movie. Its like the entire movie had a brilliant 2 hour set up for...nothing. for garbage. Not a good movie.
@Skeptical Slim That is not entirely true. Sure, studios want to make a profit, nobody denies that. Let's look at two different movie franchises...Ghostbusters and James Bond. Are you saying that neither of the latest installments are non agenda driven, and that ticket sales was the sole motivation behind these movies? How about Star Wars, or the Marvel series of movies in general? If they remake Jaws or The Birds, they would work in that climate change is the reason for an increase in shark/bird attacks. Lots of subtle and not so subtle agenda driven plots and subplots that alter or change a story into an agenda driven vehicle.
@@jamie49868 umm James bond was idolizing mi6 and making them look good. Their was a lot of references to the cold war. So yeah quite political. The original 4,5,6 star wars was a group of rebel fighting a corrupt regime who were called terrorist by said regime.
1999 was awesome, the best year of movies i lived.i saw many of them in the theater: American Beauty, The Insider, Being John Malkovich, Magnolia, Boys Don't Cry, The Matrix, Fight Club, Election, The Straight Story, The Talented Mr Ripley, The Sixth Sense, The Limey - Sodherbergs Masterpiece- , Office Space, Three Kings, The Iron Giant, The Green Mile, Eyes Wide Shut, South Park Bigger, Longer, and Uncut (the best musical film ever to me) Most of those movies are.classics, all from only one single year There were even great comedied: Austin Powers 2, Analyse This.
@@nekitamol1k242 He’s explaining what they talked about, thus fundamentally disagreeing with OP’s statement that they “didn’t say anything”. Pretty obvious really
Also Red Turtle and Le Dernier Combat. Amblin, Spielberg's first professional level film (though it's a short at 30 minutes) has no dialogue at all. It got him noticed.
+sukrpunch A quiet place was not a major studio production. The problem is that the vast majority of films in the cinema are big productions that all look the same and sound the same.
One thing I noticed with older movies versus many movies today is that older movies tend to focus heavily on the face and facial expressions of the actors. So whenever I see a new movie that is actually focusing on raw acting ability and facial expressions it's generally safe to say i'm watching a good movie.
Because the 70s was about pushing the envelope and creativity, now it’s about money and money only in the laziest way possible. At least independent and foreign films are still delivering quality
Everyone needs to watch “There Will Be Blood” by Paul Thomas Anderson (my fav director). The beginning of the movie is 30 minutes of no dialogue, and he pulled it off flawlessly.
Bill Simmons asked the same question before and the answer was pretty simple: a lot of those slow burn dramas moved to cable tv & streaming services. Movies may not be at the level of 1970s anymore, but tv series have never been better.
Ryan Fernandez That’s no excuse. Who cares about TV series, they take too much time. Rather have a solid two hours of a movie and use spare time for other things in life.
You think so..? I find a lot of series to have bad scenarios and scripts, and seldom is it perfect like those old movies. The amount of plot holes or stupid behaviour to stretch the episodes is tedious!
@@louisfreeman9551 Came to say this 👍 I can still remember seeing it in the cinema and was pleasantly surprised at how captivating it was despite no dialogue or 2 way interaction
1) The Artist 2) The Revenant 3) Mad Max Fury Road 4) There will be Blood 5) Shape of Water. These are just some of the movies I can think of right of the bat that would have long quiet scenes. Joe is like those old guys who says they don't make em like they used to, ignoring great contemporary cinema.
Yes Drive is amazing and was inspired by 80's films. There has been a resurgence of these type of movies but it depends if people are willing to look or not.
@@mck7646 i'd say aesthetically Drive was reminiscent of the 80s with its soundtrack, neon colours, clothing, vehicles, etc but cinematically I think it's more similar to 70s films than 80s films. Like old Steve McQueen or Clint Eastwood movies or the 1978 film The Driver. but that's just me nitpicking. Under the Skin is also another film with little dialogue and a real minimalistic vibe. But most of these movies are pigeon-holed into the arthouse category of movies and not fully embraced by all viewers like you say. Also Dunkirk is a big one too.
Because they shouldn't be making movies like that anymore. Movies didn't get good until the late 80's. Much like music, people didn't learn how to act until the 70's. We are now to the point where child actors of today are better than any actors 30 years ago.
Fight Club and American History X have big cult followings and he was Hulk once. He's not a mainstream star because he doesn't do stupid mainstream movies and he's not a handsome hunk like a Brad Pitt or Zac Efron. The mainsteam star's are really just mainly the guy's that the Women masturbate over.
@@andrewcutler1380 He's starred in 3 movies that have likely been watched by every fan of serious film and 1 major blockbuster. The rest are smaller independent releases. He's not like a Tom Hanks or Will Smith who's whole filmography is largely box office hits.
Because people these days have a twisted view of reality. They think things are much worse when in fact the world is relatively peaceful than previous decades.
His interview here has 2.3 million views, late-night talk shows get around 1.5 - 3 million views per night. So it's about the same as a late night talk show appearance, though he gets much more screen time here.
The 70s was incredible for film. You go through the list of all that came out and it changed film forever for the better. We need this era revitalized badly. The movies that come out are so lazy and safe.
A film without dialogue was made recently and the film is incredible. It's called "All is Lost" by Robert Redford, about a seasoned sailor trying to survive on the open ocean.
Films are not created like works of art, but are manufactured like factory items by studios that prefer to play it safe than create something groundbreaking.
Escape from Alcatraz with Clint Eastwood is like this. The writer was turned down by executive after executive because they said there wasn’t enough dialogue. He ended up contacting a director directly where it finally got accepted. Imo new movies are just cash grabs. They’re no longer an art form as everything is a sequel or remake or franchise. The Green Mile and The Shawshank Redemption are just ripoffs of Escape from Alcatraz. I believe Hollywood doesn’t like risk. They prefer to stay in their safety blanket where the money is warm. It’s bloody boring and uncreative! Did you know The Fast and the Furious and Scarface were originally black and white films from 1932 and 1955? If you didn’t know this, I definitely recommend them both.
The Green Mile and Shawshank redemption are prison movies and that is about their only relationship with Escape from Alcatraz. The point is that it would be impossible today to get a Hollywood film green lighted with a major star with no dialog at the start for 20 minutes. Maybe if Tarantino or Spielberg came a long and tried it could happen.
"No Country for Old Men" is a good example of films that make you think. There wasn't any music throughout the entire movie not even in the credits. Which really helped to absorb the atmosphere.
Fight club made me think
That's how i came to this video his opinion about these kinds of movies you Nailed the reference
That is a great call out because of the Mandela Effect. No Country For Old Men has ZERO music but there is a feeling in your gut that tells you there was.
I thought about the same movie. But for different reasons. It's a movie (and a book) that sucks you in and you end up watching the whole thing if you caught it playing on the TV. Even if you have already watched it.
Gummo is a movie that makes you think.
Joe should get Clint Eastwood on his podcast before he passes.
Is Joe sick or something?
Joe should get Dan Inosanto on
Yes Clint Eastwood, but not because hes an older person, but because hes an amazing talent.
@@zlatkojoha1677 yeah, sclorosis from all the elk meat
Yes!
Producers keep catering to the lowest common denominator for money
Abram Little they don't have a choice your too poor
PC culture and outrage culture is why. it's killing good art
@monavari or you're just an old fogie
Fred Baggs here with go again with the most lazy argument ever.
@@Vindicator12Music killed
WALL-E has about 20 - 30 mins of no dialogue and that's a kid's film
Definitely 2001 A space odyssey vibes in that movie
Came to the comment section to say, or see, this exact counterpoint. (I was actually kinda surprised that this wasn’t *THE* top comment in the first place!)
Check out Shaun the Sheep Movie 🎥 👌
That new Clooney film has huge periods of no dialog , I don't think they pull it off either
Wall e was kino
Norton looks like he’s still recovering from that fight in fight club.
Lmao dude needs to take care better of himself. Foos have millions and still looklike a borderline crackhead
MrGreen Thumb213 Probably because he doesn’t have Botox injected constantly into his face
DeepVibes lmao for real.. it's like these idiots forget that EVERYONE GETS OLD lol. Like yeah there's a lot of celebs who look great for their age but how many of them shove needles and shit into their face. Look at Sandra Bullock who admitted to putting baby dicks on her face skin to keep it younger LOL.
Acting bro!
The rule is don't talk about it
There Will Be Blood didn't have dialogue for 15 Minutes
Drive, No Country For Old Men, Nebraska are some that instantly come to mind. I dont think they are wrong that its not common but its not impossible for them to be huge hits or critically praised.
Daniel Day Louis best actor and performance I have ever seen in my entire life.
Exactly my thought. Johnny Greenwood’s score did a lot of talking in that film. Masterpiece.
That actually drove me nuts when I saw it for the first time at 17 lollll
Sean Anthony Daniel Day-Lewis* not Daniel Day Louis
"No Country for Old Men" at times had very little if no dialogue and with no music either.
Michael Brady I hated that movie it was boring
Great movie
The fact that it had no music totally set the mood, in a way that it was just extremely tense. It made an unfamiliar situation feel real and uneasy. Amazing in my opinion
@@n-oxie the uncrinkling of the chocolate bar wrapper when hes taunting the shop keeper is a prime example of the intensity
Michael Brady you don't know what you're talking about do you?
They still do make films like this. They're just hidden in the noise.
CoderShare I’ve been saying that if these artistic good films had better marketing more people would go see them.
Soo true
@@VividFilmProductions thing is, marketing is so costly, often being nearly as much as production costs. Mainstream films tend to have a marketing budget upwards of $100 million. You do get some movies getting free marketing through word of mouth, but it's often rare.
@@heavystorm1614 Marketing on average is over double the cost of production.Its a slimy side of the industry.Very closed door kind of shit.Production heads and board members basically hand picking what they want pushed and trashing good films to have a limited release or arthouse run at most.Fuckin shameful cause there are some seriously good films out there.
@@douglasfreckman8190 Yeah, I agree. I will say, there are great art house/indie/non-mainstream movies out there and they aren't hard to find. The most we can do is pay to watch them, and show our intent/desire to watch more films like that. Parasite and The Lighthouse have been my favourites of the year so far. The festival circuit does great for the smaller movies. Starting from Cannes all the way through to Tiff, the lineups never disappoint. However, you're just never going to get those movies to make 500 mil - 1 billion dollars as consistently as the typical 'blockbuster.' It is sad that so many screens are devoted to those movies. I know some studios demand most, if not all screens, opening day/week for flagship pictures...
The lighthouse doesn’t have dialogue for like 10 minutes and it’s incredible.
Incredible but weird at the same time
Would 100% agree, the film deserved some type of Oscar
That's a throw away line from Joe he hasn't actually thought about.
Silence or lack of communication is used regularly in films across the board.
What's the Viking film starring Mads Mikkelsen? How much talking was in that? Bugger all, great movie though.
Edit: Valhalla rising.
Especially There Will Be Blood. Nearly 20 minutes.
@@fredsmith-kingofthelunatic7810 It identifies a major gap in this topic, and Rogan's question, that no one ever really admits because it throw the question back at itself: The types of movies are still being made, it's just not as many people (or at least the same type of people as before) are watching them.
As Quentin Tarantino once said; "the 70's years were the greatest time of American movies ever", today the world of cinema is in a sort of crisis where Superheroes's movies are dominating the industry especially, Marvel's. Fortunately, Tarantino or the own Scorsese have been the directors who have kept cinema alive.
Not to mention films like Whiplash, Birdman, The Lighthouse, The Master (pretty much all of PTA's catalogue for that matter), and hundreds of other beautiful works of art being constantly released
@@kinhamid9665 Man you can't name hundreds of other beautiful works of art constantly released. When you only mentioned four and the last one is from almost ten years ago.
@@Jeferson1075 bro your understanding of modern cinema is based on youtube ads 😭😭😭
@@kinhamid9665 "Constantly released"? Not a single one of those movies is even remotely new.
I don't like the overuse of special effects. I feel like for directors of the past, they had to be creative to explore their ideas.
Nolan and Tarantino are one of the few directors to build elaborate props for their movies and using minor CGI to clean up the scene.
Movie makers today are often terrified of going over their audiences' heads for a millisecond.
And it seems we keep getting shorter
Bruce Lee wouldve done films for at least 20 yrs had he not died so soon , he was to play DEA cop in Rome opposite Sophia Loren
Agreed
Well go get 10 or 20 million and make your own original movie then.🤷♀️🤷♀️🤷♀️
@@maximusareilius2262 typical sheep comment
The Godfather was probably one of the most perfect movies ever made. Dialog that was clear and not muffled, concise editing that needed no more or less footage.
@Sean S It has a valid point to make ITS INSISTANT!
The first godfather and first half of the p2. Is up there with anything that's ever been made
my favourite editing part was when the godfather's moustache turned into a tree.
Editing...that's what I'm saying.
It definitely has the best editing I’ve ever seen in a movie.
"Locke" is another unique movie where dude is driving the whole time talking with people on the phone
YES, awesome performance!!!!
Yeah unreal movie, underrated like all the best movies
yeah but hes on the phone the whole time
Let's work on finding the best logical solution
Tom Hardy is amazing
The reason they don't make movies like the 70s is pretty much because of one movie, Heaven's Gate. It was a western from the guy who made The Deer Hunter. In the 70s, directors were allowed pretty much total control of their movies, the studios had faith in them. During Heaven's Gate, the director demanded more and more money, and kept going over schedule. The movie was a total box office bomb, and resulted in studios going back to strictly controlling movies during the 80s to focus on cash and not on the art. Reading about Heaven's Gate is fascinating.
Guy's name is Michael Cimino
Animal abuse was one of the problem too
Was thinking Heavens Gate as soon as Joe asked the question and kept waotong for Ed to mention it. Really was sorta Ciminos fault (along with a few other movies)
Joe doesn’t even know that there is an entire independent film industry
Too busy injecting DMT
Exactly. Hollywood has never been artistic and only a few of the truly great directors such as Francis Coopola Ford, Martin Scorsese and a few others of that elite rank has made films that can be considered art. The rest of Hollywood is mostly entertainment escapism
No country for old men.
Or maybe he is referring to hollywood...
nathan wallace that’s just false. I work in the film industry. The trend towards blockbusters is quite recent. For most of the history of film, Hollywood produced films of artistic merit along with the money making crowd pleasers. Sony Classic Pictures is Sony’s arthouse Wing and still produces some of the greatest art films of the day. Until the Disney Merger the same was true of 20th century Fox and Fox Searchlight. Additionally. Scorsese didn’t start out making big budget Hollywood films. They started out making art films and built their reputation. Some of the greatest directors today make arthouse films along with big budget films. Alfonso Cuaron, Alejandro Inarritu, etc all make Hollywood films, art films, and Hollywood art films.
The Revenant was basically a silent film
Naah there was still plenty of dialogue though.
love that movie
Not really at all in the slightest lol Tons of dialogue.
The same with Dunkirk
...A Quiet Place...
Dunkirk was like 19 lines of dialogue
Obviously there are exceptions.
Naw it was 10
Dunkirk fucking sucked dude
And it was fucking terrible
And a bunch of ADHD addled people complained constantly about it
When the teacher calls on you and you didn't do the reading.
The movie that came out last year called “Arctic“ is like that. There is virtually no dialogue throughout the whole movie.
Exploring Abandoned Mines and Unusual Places ~ that was an AMAZING movie
Exploring Abandoned Mines and Unusual Places also watch Valhalla Rising. Hardly any dialogue in it
I think he’s talking about big blockbuster movies lol
"All is Lost" is another one. Dude is almost literally quiet the whole entire movie
@@victorhng yeah Robert Redford at that!
How this man doesn't have an Oscar is beyond me. Great Actor
Great actor does not mean he has to get an Oscar. Many great actors never got an actor. Peter O'Toole never won an Oscar.
But he got one for Primal Fear??
@@bighands69 that is true. Then some greats got one for an average performance later on to make it up. Which snubbed a younger artist who deserved it
@@rdt3922 nominated but didn’t win
@@rdt3922 I think he should have won for Primal Fear. He was absolutely brilliant.
Nortin talks for like 5 minutes and says about 30 seconds worth of actual words.
Yeah, you know what I mean!
Horrible podcast, great actor but terrible guest
My wife is the same way.
..that's because he actually does some thinking and doesn't have cookie-cut answers ready up his sleeve
@@olessiam.6460 lol exactly
The godfather is still one of the top five best movies ever.
I've never seen it. All the time I say I'm going to see it, but I never do.
I've tried to like it. Always found it quite boring. And I enjoy slower paced films. It just never clicked with me.
@@theindiediary5950 Same here, I'm famous for liking what my friends consider slow, boring movies, but I never quite got interested enough in the Godfather to bother trying any of the sequels.
The godfather 1 and 2 are definately top 5 cinematic experiences of all time. Doesn't matter how they portrayed the Italian mob. That's not what makes the movies great. It's the intense story telling.. brilliant music filming everything was just masterclass with those movies. Number 3 was a great movie in its own right but compared to the first 2 it's child's play to be honest
@@jmlkhan5153 GF2 is by far the best one. So real.
Korean movies these days are like Hollywood in the 70's. It's commercially successful but they're still making real art and directors have real stories to tell.
Good point
Parasite is great.
@@iliveinsideyourhouse3943
Legit really korean movies are like hollywood movies in the 70’s? THEN THATS GOLDEN!!!!!
I WANT UR RECOMMENDATIONS THE GENRES I LIKE ARE
Crime
Horror
Sports-Boxing
Drama
Thriller
Yh basically that
@@samirhamzah5245
I recommend oldboy, I saw the devil and the host.
@@samirhamzah5245
Korean films:
My Sassy Girl - Romance
The Chaser - Thriller
I Saw The Devil - Thriller
Parasite - Comedy
The Handmaiden - Erotic Thriller
The Wailing - Mystery Horror
Train To Busan - Horror
Snowpiercer - Sci-Fi
The Host - Horror Comedy
Mother - Drama Mystery
On Your Wedding Day - Comedy Drama
Burning - Thriller
Minari - Drama
Thirst - Horror
Joint Security Area - Drama
Lady Vengeance - Thriller
I'm A Cyborg And That's Okay - Comedy
Okja - Comedy
Memories Of Murder - Mystery Thriller Crime
The Good, The Bad, and The Weird - Comedy
The Flu - Thriller
A Tale Of Two Sisters - Horror
A Bittersweet Life - Drama
They didn't mention Sergio Leone who was one of the best at making a movie with very little dialogue.
Because its not Hollywood.
Who would be good directors to get on the podcast? I think Quentin Tarantino and Oliver Stone would be interesting choices.
you would be correct.
Clint Eastwood would be interesting but he’s pushing 90
Todd Phillips would be cool after joker, pretty rare to have a director make one of the best comedies and one of the best dramas of their generation. Also Martin Scorsese. The most interesting one I could imagine would probably be Stanley Kubrick though
Good luck with that.....
Martin Scorsese facts
Get Clint Eastwood, the legend himself on JRE before he dies (thought I hear the reaper is still scared shitless of him)
@alex lu yes, also an amazing director.
@alex lu it's a joke. Because Clint Eastwood is badass in his movies, Gorillaz even made a song named Clint Eastwood. I think there are cultural differences if you don't understand. Satire.
@alex lu DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT HUMOUR IS????
@@jeesusmeesuss5247 Death comes for us all. Clint Eastwood can't change that.
You make a simple joke and so many autistic people respond “you know Clint Eastwood is just a man”. Like they think they’re smart or something
2001: a space odyssey doesn’t have dialogue till 35 mins in.
Manic Rhymes that movie is from the 70s tho
@@jimmy2055 hahaha clueless
1968 actually
My bad I thought it was 35 mins
Thats because the opening is centered around apes cheif
It was so cute listening to him trying not to insult anyone in film industry.
Nope, he had nothing to say, so waffled.
Norton’s smart and old school enough to understand what the real reason is behind why movies like those in the 80s-90s aren’t made anymore but understands that if he does dare utter his TRUE opinion, he will be shunned and probably permanently for life from any acting and roles.
Art, which movies like The Godfather, Alien(s), No Country for Old Men, Full Metal Jacket, Fight Club and beyond are, cannot have a “politically correct point system” to satisfy. Movies made in the years 1960-2010ish were amazing because the freedom to create a story without any afterthought of which of the now 900 groups it may offend was there which allowed both the directors/writers and the actors to write, make, and act out movies without anything held back and with the story and cinematic quality being the main focus. Now, literally EVERYTHING is ALL about appeasing the left. Marxism has taken over everything from Hollywood to academia to social media to congress, and as usual, Marxism destroys and sucks the life out of everything it touches.
- Ex Soviet Union citizen now living in the U.S who knows a thing or two about life under totalitarian control.
I remember watching Fight Club and turning it off after 30 mins for being slow. I watched it again and to this date I name it as my favorite movie. These movies are not for everyone but if done correctly they can be some of the greatest movies of all time.
you think fight club came off as slow? bruh
@@gavsterw i thought so too on my first watch
Lol, if you thought Fight Club was slow, watch some Andrei Tarkovsky films.
The last time I was this early, Ben Askren was still conscious
Aww man let that man rest in peace already lol
@@dominicbonora6099 He has had 2 naps already, he should be plenty rested
Rip
Oh snap lol
The great white hype
Taxi Driver (1976) hands down one of the best films ever made
i mean, it's good but i don't even think it's top 100
Taxi driver is boring
Goodfellas is better
Shawshank!
Schindlers list is a classic
The 'short attention span' theater, I think could be attributed to the market's general over-saturation today (thanks Disney)
I blame Netflix. Up until recently movies weren’t JUST a backdrop. Now it’s easy to just have it on
and phones, everyone has to look at their phones every 5 minutes
Market is not saturated. Come on have you any idea how may platforms there are?
RUclips and social media is to blame. People seem to not be able to take their time with anything anymore, everything has to be digested in 2 minutes because it can.
Absolutely. I took a class about this very thing at uni and it's quite shocking how much films are tailored to sell the most tickets possible. Even adding a few swear words in just to make it pg13 (Which is the most popular rating)
The decade from 1967 to 1977 has been called Hollywood's second golden age. So many classics. This was when the big studios were making expensive flops and suddenly an inexpensive little film called Easy Rider made a fortune. Cleared the way for young filmmakers like Coppola, Scorcese, DePalma, Lucas, and many others to make films without much interference from the studios. Bonnie and Clyde, The Graduate, Midnight Cowboy, Deliverance, French Connection, Network, The Exorcist, Godfather one and two, Taxi Driver, Jaws, Rocky, Chinatown, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Dog Day Afternoon, Carrie, Apocalypse Now, American Graffiti, Annie Hall-- it's a long list. I doubt you could cite a better decade; also these were all made by major studios, not scrappy little independents trying to do something original. Now the best stuff is being done for streaming services and TV.
And then came Spielberg and Jaws and Lucas and Star Wars. Big, exciting movies that made huge profits. And that's the answer: Blockbusters can make huge profits.
The 90s were better
You’re watching a man combatting his true thoughts. Norton had something to say but didn’t want to say it.
@@YTbobo4u No he just has so many thoughts going on, it's quite obvious.
Nah, I think he just didn't have a good answer
Nope, he just had nothing to say, so waffled for 5 mins
@@ilikethatboulder.thatisani5496 No. He just has ADHD. Time to get him on meds.
All of you above are incorrect and Greco (OP) is spot on. Norton understands that left wing Marxist ideas have permeated everything from Hollywood and beyond but gets that if he dares speak out the truth, he will be shunned and ostracized probably for life which means no more acting and money. I don’t blame him..
Movies are made for kids not adults now
We have fewer adults too.
Like Sausage Party..
I hardly ever go to see a movie in the theaters. I went in July. Every movie was basically a kid's movie.
@@noone8418 I was about to say, more adults act like kids these days lol
Are you fucking kidding me? This is the dumbest take I’ve read today.
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise
I am Jack's comment on a RUclips thread.
I am Jack's dmt experience
The next person to make a Fight Club reference gets a lead salad.
I am Samurai Jacks lack of dialogue.
@@Theevil6ify I am salad's complete lack of lead.
I’ve literally noticed my whole life that the year 99 spawned some of the best movies. Fight club, the matrix, American beauty, the boondock saints, sixth sense, Detroit rock city, girl interrupted, jawbreaker (lol), ghost dog, the hurricane, man on the moon etc etc
boondock saints is ass.. it was a good year though. Most people will usually say 99 was the best year for movies
Magnolia
@@_sayan_roy_ magnolia came out in 98
American Beauty is the best movie of all time in my opinion, 99 was amazing and especially the whole 90s
@@mnstr2173 It is a gem indeed. Kind of pissed about how they cancelled Spacey for good...
Edward “it it like was like ya know like it it” Norton
Me: "It's pathetic how people today have such short attention span."
Also me: *puts video on 1.75x to finish it faster.*
you need a doctor dude
this actually increases your attention on the video since you have to focus more to comprehense what they are saying
Ahahaha that’s me
If you actually do that then you might just be a genius or super weird!
1,5 sounds normal to me
The “Revenant” was a movie where filmmaking was definitely re-established echoing past endeavors.
I loved it for that exact reason and its disheartening to hear not many people of my generation share the same view.
I read the book but haven't seen the movie. Gonna watch it now because of your comment. Thanks man.
@@BlueCollarHero1 how was it ???
@@walterkaiyuenpang3556 The book or the movie? The book was pretty amazing, and I enjoyed the movie, too. 👍
When i watched The Revenant to my point of view it was a disappointing. DiCaprio shouldn't have win that oscar for a movie where he is crawling and and saying nothing ,The Revenant was mediocre in comparison with other movies (where he really deserved ) , but hey it was a good movie in comparrison with Pixels , Terminator Genisys or Fantastic four or Star Wars:The Force Awakens it was good enough. But movies like inside out ,the martian ,Ex Machina,the walk are much more memorable and fun to watch, well at least The Revenant tried to do something fresh but it is overrated
Look at something like “A Clockwork Orange.” That movie is still shocking and it came out in 1971.
SnoozeFest.
You people have bad taste!
@@pazuzu603 I'm more into the ol in out
Why you people hating on a Kubrick movie? We have bigger fish to fry. (Like Disney live-action remakes)
Bit boring for me but good movie
Blade Runner 2049 is a rare masterpiece in my opinion.
Plot sucked balls
K I N O
I fucking agree
It was good for like an hour and a half or 2 hours, but the ending was HORRIBLE, GOD AWFUL and single handedly ruined the whole movie. Its like the entire movie had a brilliant 2 hour set up for...nothing. for garbage. Not a good movie.
K I N O le film daddy villeneuve ooooh i love it mmh
Norton is great. Glad he's back. 25th Hour is one of my favorite movies of all time.
This whole interview the Hulk looks like he's about to belch but then he doesn't .
“Conan The Barbarian” has like a 1 page dialogue page😂
Still a great movie. Arnie had so much charisma just being on screen.
Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the women!
@@arceyes "The riddle, of Steel!"
Back in the day there was more story telling and less agenda.
What day? Not the 1970s, not the 1950s, not the 1940s or '30s.
@@hd-xc2lz There have always been agenda driven movies. It just seems like every movie made today is agenda driven.
every penny today is agenda driven.
@Skeptical Slim That is not entirely true. Sure, studios want to make a profit, nobody denies that. Let's look at two different movie franchises...Ghostbusters and James Bond. Are you saying that neither of the latest installments are non agenda driven, and that ticket sales was the sole motivation behind these movies? How about Star Wars, or the Marvel series of movies in general? If they remake Jaws or The Birds, they would work in that climate change is the reason for an increase in shark/bird attacks. Lots of subtle and not so subtle agenda driven plots and subplots that alter or change a story into an agenda driven vehicle.
@@jamie49868 umm James bond was idolizing mi6 and making them look good. Their was a lot of references to the cold war. So yeah quite political. The original 4,5,6 star wars was a group of rebel fighting a corrupt regime who were called terrorist by said regime.
1999 was awesome, the best year of movies i lived.i saw many of them in the theater:
American Beauty, The Insider, Being John Malkovich, Magnolia, Boys Don't Cry, The Matrix, Fight Club, Election, The Straight Story, The Talented Mr Ripley, The Sixth Sense, The Limey - Sodherbergs Masterpiece- , Office Space, Three Kings, The Iron Giant, The Green Mile, Eyes Wide Shut, South Park Bigger, Longer, and Uncut (the best musical film ever to me)
Most of those movies are.classics, all from only one single year
There were even great comedied: Austin Powers 2, Analyse This.
Even horror films like Audition and Blair witch project
I don’t think Norton makes sense even to himself.
Shut up
Yeah this was hard to watch
He talked for 5 minutes but didn’t say anything.
Back then directors had more freedom to do risky projects, nowadays it's all about money and agenda. No more no less.
@@miguelvidal2335 Lol wtf does your reply have to do with the comment?
@@nekitamol1k242 He’s explaining what they talked about, thus fundamentally disagreeing with OP’s statement that they “didn’t say anything”. Pretty obvious really
You just didn't hear or understood what he said. Idiot calling others dumb only because you didn't grasp what was said 😂
The fart explanation was awesome, thank you for that. Funny as hell man.
2001 runs like half an hour without dialogue and put a stranglehold on my attention
For wonderful examples of movies without much dialog .
Robert Redford All Is Lost (2013)
Mads Mikkelsen Arctic (2018)
Also Red Turtle and Le Dernier Combat. Amblin, Spielberg's first professional level film (though it's a short at 30 minutes) has no dialogue at all. It got him noticed.
All is lost was a good movie i commented that movie couldnt remember the name of it
Quest For Fire I think had no dialogue.
Mads! Hes wonderful! Master of microexpressions!
William Steen I'll add Mads Mikkelsen in Valhalla Rising (2009)
Joe: "They would never make a movie where there was no talking for a long period of time anymore"
A quiet place: "am I a joke to you?"
Sign language is still dialogue
+sukrpunch
A quiet place was not a major studio production. The problem is that the vast majority of films in the cinema are big productions that all look the same and sound the same.
fuck you and that mediocre ass film you lame....silence is a gimmick in that film
That movie was whack af tho the monsters looked like a middleschool kids cgi’d them
Dunkirk!
One thing I noticed with older movies versus many movies today is that older movies tend to focus heavily on the face and facial expressions of the actors. So whenever I see a new movie that is actually focusing on raw acting ability and facial expressions it's generally safe to say i'm watching a good movie.
I don’t like this clip. A whole lot of talk and nothing being said.
Because people stopped reading novels and lost their imaginations.
Good point
Nah
Edward Norton is one of the greatest actors of all time.
@I Will Rock Your Face! oh hi Mark
Tom Hanks "Castaway" was a semi silent film
456 789 😂😂
@@Eric_P2823 And because it had no score until Hanks gets rescued.
No country for old men
Come on Wilson talked all the way through it
Predator. but it was made in the 80s.
Because the 70s was about pushing the envelope and creativity, now it’s about money and money only in the laziest way possible. At least independent and foreign films are still delivering quality
Everyone needs to watch “There Will Be Blood” by Paul Thomas Anderson (my fav director). The beginning of the movie is 30 minutes of no dialogue, and he pulled it off flawlessly.
Bill Simmons asked the same question before and the answer was pretty simple: a lot of those slow burn dramas moved to cable tv & streaming services. Movies may not be at the level of 1970s anymore, but tv series have never been better.
Ryan Fernandez That’s no excuse. Who cares about TV series, they take too much time. Rather have a solid two hours of a movie and use spare time for other things in life.
@@LovelyDay11 a lot of people care lmao
You think so..? I find a lot of series to have bad scenarios and scripts, and seldom is it perfect like those old movies. The amount of plot holes or stupid behaviour to stretch the episodes is tedious!
The first uh, many minutes of *Up* was silent. And was brilliant beginning to that film.
Tbh I only remember that opening scene. The rest was just...meh
Didn't WALL-E have a long stretch without dialogue as well? It's been a long time since we watched it.
@@louisfreeman9551 Came to say this 👍
I can still remember seeing it in the cinema and was pleasantly surprised at how captivating it was despite no dialogue or 2 way interaction
That lack of dialogue was one of the reasons I loved Valhalla Rising (2009) with Mads Mikkelsen.
Daniel Vance same here!!
Cliff notes: He doesn't know why.
I think the BOOK Edward Norton was referencing was, "Best. Movie. Year. Ever.: How 1999 Blew Up the Big Screen" by Brian Raftery.
1) The Artist
2) The Revenant
3) Mad Max Fury Road
4) There will be Blood
5) Shape of Water.
These are just some of the movies I can think of right of the bat that would have long quiet scenes. Joe is like those old guys who says they don't make em like they used to, ignoring great contemporary cinema.
Drive starting Ryan gosling was a good movie that lacked dialogue,made it more intense in my opinion
Good one. A fine flick!
“Drive” was one of the last great movies with little dialogue I’ve seen.
Yes Drive is amazing and was inspired by 80's films. There has been a resurgence of these type of movies but it depends if people are willing to look or not.
@@mck7646 i'd say aesthetically Drive was reminiscent of the 80s with its soundtrack, neon colours, clothing, vehicles, etc but cinematically I think it's more similar to 70s films than 80s films. Like old Steve McQueen or Clint Eastwood movies or the 1978 film The Driver. but that's just me nitpicking.
Under the Skin is also another film with little dialogue and a real minimalistic vibe. But most of these movies are pigeon-holed into the arthouse category of movies and not fully embraced by all viewers like you say. Also Dunkirk is a big one too.
Dunkirk as well, especially in the beginning of the film.
@@KaizerMan yeah late 70's, early 80's vibes. Might be my favorite era of movies.
Terrible movie
"there will be blood" has no dialogue for like first 10-15 minutes
Because they shouldn't be making movies like that anymore. Movies didn't get good until the late 80's. Much like music, people didn't learn how to act until the 70's. We are now to the point where child actors of today are better than any actors 30 years ago.
Why isn't Norton a household name? His acting is genious.
Fight Club and American History X have big cult followings and he was Hulk once.
He's not a mainstream star because he doesn't do stupid mainstream movies and he's not a handsome hunk like a Brad Pitt or Zac Efron. The mainsteam star's are really just mainly the guy's that the Women masturbate over.
Huh? I don't know anyone who isn't aware of Ed Norton. What rock are your friends living under?
@@andrewcutler1380 He's starred in 3 movies that have likely been watched by every fan of serious film and 1 major blockbuster.
The rest are smaller independent releases. He's not like a Tom Hanks or Will Smith who's whole filmography is largely box office hits.
@@mre7152 I agree, he's not as well known as a Tom Hanks or Tom Cruise, but he's still A-list. 'Fight Club' is still a pop-culture milestone.
When I saw " the joker" I was amazed people called it violent. People mistakes violence with a form of truth.
Because people these days have a twisted view of reality. They think things are much worse when in fact the world is relatively peaceful than previous decades.
There's the one scene in Joker that you've never seen in a Marvel-DC movie. It's the quality, not the quantity
those people who called it violent have never seen true violence. they are a bunch of pussies
The artist literally just won best picture a few years back lol
I know he’s sort of been around forever but I definitely missed Edward Norton. He’s definitely one of the better artists of his generation.
David Fincher?? Dude is one of the biggest names in Hollywood and has made consistently great work.
I don't think Ed Norton knows who David Fincher is. David just makes underground films and Ed makes big blockbusters like Fight Club.
Kaizer-Man What. David Fincher worked with Ed Norton on Fight Club. They definitley know eachother
@@KaizerMan wtf
Those movies exist they’re just not widely released
I’m impressed he got Ed Norton on this podcast
Norton is promoting a movie, he's popped up on several other podcasts in the last week.
His interview here has 2.3 million views, late-night talk shows get around 1.5 - 3 million views per night. So it's about the same as a late night talk show appearance, though he gets much more screen time here.
He’s not that famous
Lol he got Elon, Bernie, Kanye, Mel Gibson. Joe Rogan can get (almost) anyone
1999 is the goat year for films
The 70s was incredible for film. You go through the list of all that came out and it changed film forever for the better. We need this era revitalized badly. The movies that come out are so lazy and safe.
Joes questions are awesome and the thoughtfulness and time allowed to answer the questions are absolutely wonderful and Necessary!!
Joe Rogan has the best interviews hands down
esias Boo hands down, don't shoot.
His name is Robert Paulson.
Actually it was The Narrator
His name is Robert Paulson
@@Realasadonut His name is Robert Paulson
His name is Robert Paulson...
He had bitch tits
Love JRE for his content
A film without dialogue was made recently and the film is incredible. It's called "All is Lost" by Robert Redford, about a seasoned sailor trying to survive on the open ocean.
“Duel” is another great 70s car movie
Was watching it on TV the other day for the first time in years. I'd forgotten how perfect it is
'The Duel' movie was great.Loved it.
:30 Wall-E had no dialog for the first half of the movie.
Wall-E was a kids film based on visual animations. It was not a serious film.
@@bighands69 Meh...it was making a pretty big adult point. Have to disagree. Consumption...over-reliance on technology, etc.
Drive with Ryan Gosling was a great movie with very less dialogues and did pretty well in box office.
That was a cool little movie, actually. Not perfect but, it didn't seem to try to be. I liked it.
Lots of movies recently with long silent moments if you look hard enough. Not that many films like that even back in the 70s.
The Artist was dialogue free and was released a few years ago - it won oscars.
was dog shit too!
Films are not created like works of art, but are manufactured like factory items by studios that prefer to play it safe than create something groundbreaking.
Interstellar was pretty good & it had long silent parts with just Hans Zimmer in the background & I loved it, it sets the mood very good.
Stopped watching movies since 2012
Can't stand these new movies
intellectual pain is what I felt trying to follow Edward while he was over-articulating his answer
Better movies are made when the money men can't work out what makes money anymore.
Ric Marina thought I was just too high to follow along
I would’ve been so confused if I listen to this drunk
Omg I’m feeling the same, the guy is trying too hard to sound intellectual when you can see he’s a simple guy
@@YSANROCHEOfficialRUclips I think he is good and experience but possibly his thing is fading away....
Mr Robot recently had an episode with almost no dialogue
There Will Be Blood had very little or no dialog for like the first 20 minutes. One of the best films of the 21st century.
Smart phones and Gen Z happened. People with no attention span that want instant gratification.
Just a friendly note from a fan:
If ya haven’t seen Norton in *Leaves Of Grass* ... check it out! 😁👌🏼
Wow the spinal tap reference came out of nowhere 😂
He should watch “Too old to die young” on Amazon it’s like a word an hour.
Lol.
Escape from Alcatraz with Clint Eastwood is like this. The writer was turned down by executive after executive because they said there wasn’t enough dialogue. He ended up contacting a director directly where it finally got accepted. Imo new movies are just cash grabs. They’re no longer an art form as everything is a sequel or remake or franchise. The Green Mile and The Shawshank Redemption are just ripoffs of Escape from Alcatraz. I believe Hollywood doesn’t like risk. They prefer to stay in their safety blanket where the money is warm. It’s bloody boring and uncreative! Did you know The Fast and the Furious and Scarface were originally black and white films from 1932 and 1955? If you didn’t know this, I definitely recommend them both.
The Green Mile and Shawshank redemption are prison movies and that is about their only relationship with Escape from Alcatraz.
The point is that it would be impossible today to get a Hollywood film green lighted with a major star with no dialog at the start for 20 minutes. Maybe if Tarantino or Spielberg came a long and tried it could happen.
Chris Nolan’s Dunkirk has little dialogue and is just amazing!! Visually fantastic. A soundtrack that makes you feel it.
Every movie of Martin Scorsese was a masterpiece
I miss those types of movies
except for The Departed
@@footballpredictions-g2yare you serious? I enjoyed that movie it was great.
Still have The Irishman to look forward to.
batman After Hours is a masterpiece dark comedy by Scorsese!