Car & Driver finally tested a FWD 2016 Chrysler 200 3.6 and it put down some really good numbers. It's a lot quicker than I expected. I love the trap speed it put down! 0-60 mph in 5.7 seconds. 0-100 mph in 14.3 seconds. 0-120 mph in 22.5 seconds. 5-60 mph in 5.9 seconds. 1/4 Mile in 14.3 @ 100 mph. They also said that Chrysler took care of the transmission recalls for the '16 model year, and made some slight improvements to the 9 speed auto on top of it. I would take a fully loaded FWD 2016 Chrysler 200C if I were to buy one. I don't need the heavier, slower AWD version that gets lower gas mileage living down here in Georgia now. We'll see when the lease is up on one of my cars in a few months. Nice review by the way.
I do wish you would have reviewed a fully loaded 200S or fully loaded 200C though. A 200S with leather definitely has a nice interior, but a fully loaded 200C has an even nicer interior with more options than the 200S as I'm sure you already know. I love the optional 19" wheels available on both models, and I also like the optional LED fog lamps among other things.
I like the 200(my sister in law just traded her old one for the new one), but I feel it's too small compared to the 300, it should like you said at least have more rear passenger space in the back..I guess if you want more space you'll have to get the 300..
Do not like 19" tire dia on a mid size care, and all wheel drive is good for SUV, so need only front wheel drive. And 2.4 litter engine is good for new cars but for used one 3.6 litter is better but issue is gasoline is expensive
+Fazlkarim Khan Love the interior and the front end of it, rear end looks kinda polarizing to me because of its roofline and the fastback like design, it certainly doesn't really look like a sedan.
I own a 200 s 2016 the car is shit and i would highly suggest to stay away. 3.6 l engine is ok maybe in a smaller lighter car but this car is heavy as shit.
I like the 200(my sister in law just traded her old one for the new one), but I feel it's too small compared to the 300, it should like you said at least have more rear passenger space in the back..I guess if you want more space you'll have to get the 300..
Lovejazz01 mid size is smaller than full size. I find the smaller back seat, means less wasted space. We all don't need the same thing. V6 AWD is what i like.
The car is amazing.
It has so many good features and so many good things:
It warms your seat and your steering wheel
210 kmp/h so good.
Just got this monster today and its bloody mental I love it, all white leather slippery slick with the looks I bump with it
Car & Driver finally tested a FWD 2016 Chrysler 200 3.6 and it put down some really good numbers. It's a lot quicker than I expected. I love the trap speed it put down! 0-60 mph in 5.7 seconds. 0-100 mph in 14.3 seconds. 0-120 mph in 22.5 seconds. 5-60 mph in 5.9 seconds. 1/4 Mile in 14.3 @ 100 mph. They also said that Chrysler took care of the transmission recalls for the '16 model year, and made some slight improvements to the 9 speed auto on top of it. I would take a fully loaded FWD 2016 Chrysler 200C if I were to buy one. I don't need the heavier, slower AWD version that gets lower gas mileage living down here in Georgia now. We'll see when the lease is up on one of my cars in a few months. Nice review by the way.
I do wish you would have reviewed a fully loaded 200S or fully loaded 200C though. A 200S with leather definitely has a nice interior, but a fully loaded 200C has an even nicer interior with more options than the 200S as I'm sure you already know. I love the optional 19" wheels available on both models, and I also like the optional LED fog lamps among other things.
I like the 200(my sister in law just traded her old one for the new one), but I feel it's too small compared to the 300, it should like you said at least have more rear passenger space in the back..I guess if you want more space you'll have to get the 300..
this is a really nice car
I'm certainly hard pressed to find the panel gaps in the interior you alluded to..........
I’d like to see him put together a panel and see his gaps
Do not like 19" tire dia on a mid size care, and all wheel drive is good for SUV, so need only front wheel drive. And 2.4 litter engine is good for new cars but for used one 3.6 litter is better but issue is gasoline is expensive
please do a 2005 mitsubishi monitor limited if you can find one.
+cardudes meant motero
The only thing keeping me from seriously looking at the 200 are those ugly ass reflectors on the outside wheel wells
i am 5'5 at the most and so is the rest of my family really, should the leg room in the back be more than enough? :o
spawn1324 dude you could get a smart car and be fine...
I'm sure it will fit like a glove. I sure want to get this with AWD.
Why does this guy think he knows what power people need. Some people would never notice the 4 cyl power.
3.6 How good is the engine?
2.4 vs 3.6 which is better?
3.6
3.6.
The 2.4 is a FIAT engine.
Please do the new BMW 7 series!!!!
+Oscar Rivas I will!
+Camerons Car Reviews Please do the 2016 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid / Sonata Plug-In Hybrid!!!!
What's Your Opinion On The 2016 Honda Civic?
+Fazlkarim Khan Love the interior and the front end of it, rear end looks kinda polarizing to me because of its roofline and the fastback like design, it certainly doesn't really look like a sedan.
Camerons Car Reviews Well Did You Liked It
Fazlkarim Khan Its okay, but I will hold final judgment until I actually see the vehicle in person.
+Camerons Car Reviews Please review 2016 Hyundai Elantra GT. Thanx!
He should attend speech class.
I own a 200 s 2016 the car is shit and i would highly suggest to stay away. 3.6 l engine is ok maybe in a smaller lighter car but this car is heavy as shit.
more blah....
I like the 200(my sister in law just traded her old one for the new one), but I feel it's too small compared to the 300, it should like you said at least have more rear passenger space in the back..I guess if you want more space you'll have to get the 300..
Lovejazz01 mid size is smaller than full size. I find the smaller back seat, means less wasted space. We all don't need the same thing. V6 AWD is what i like.