Our Weird New Hyperreality
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Support The Channel
Paypal
paypal.me/thin...
Patreon
www.patreon.com...
Odysee
odysee.com/@Th...
Welcome to the 3rd dimension gentlemen...it is a place that exists between the one dimension (actual reality) and the other one (the internet) and clashes and intrudes upon the others. In this new hyperreality we cannot agree on anything, let alone talk to each other and it is only going to get worse. Enjoy the ride.
After listening to Tucker talk about evolution using designer dogs as evidence of adaptive radiation and referencing the fossil record while claiming that we've never seen any evidence of new species resulting from mutation and external pressures, I get the impression that he concentrated his educational attention on his journalism classes. Classes which certainly must've prepared him to absorb and fully comprehend articles about genetics and evolution in magazines like Scientific American or perhaps The National Enquirer. ;) In my own reality, probably because actually reading Darwin's "Origin Of Species And The Descent Of Man" poisoned my mind, I have yet to see any living creature that didn't appear to be the product of either asexual or sexual reproduction and I certainly don't believe in spontaneous generation. I do wonder what Tucker thinks about the clear evidence of extinctions and evolutionary processes at work in the fossil record. If we ever manage to re-create Eohippus in the lab, I might give him one to keep as a pet.
Dogs have less genetic information than wolves that's what he meant. Pruning genetic information to get a new organism is not evolution it's selection or adaptation.
No lab experiment that I know of or that is not disputed was shown to create new genetic information.
And yes there are competing theories to darwinian evolution which is too slow and too improbable to work. Theories like the ones proposed by Denis Noble where he takes the example of immune system cells and applies it to evolution to make it work.
Well said, I appreciate you breaking it down without straight up attacking him.
No experiment has ever resulted in the creation of new genes. There is only evidence of epigenetics and genetic mutations of genes that already existed.
Controlled (corporate) media has been at the cause of hyper-reality manipulation of the public forever. National news (propaganda) influences the masses.
Reality is not what YOU think something is. Rather, reality is what you can get two or more people to agree-to. quote from Ron Hubbard.
A degree in any science does not qualify an individual to determine what is reality. It would be folly to trust the "experts". They are often paid shills for their puppet-masters who write the checks. The best recent example was the manufactued pestilence combined with authoritarian manipulation.
Those groups that control the internet and communication will dictate what they want for "reality", be-damned what anyone thinks. Censor the opposition is their method of control.
@@zaclovesschool2273 I certainly didn't intend to do so because I do respect Tucker's courage in investigative journalism, but rather to highlight that as Thinking Ape implied, our current social dialogue appears to be plaqued by people with name recognition. Celebrity status alone doesn't qualify them to comment competently on fields of study about which they know little.
As part of my major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, I took undergraduate microbiology and virology- even made a little pocket change as a lab assistant to an HIV researcher. I recognize that none of that put me in strong position to comment on the origins of and proposed defensive measures against pandemics. I try to stay in my lane when those smarter than me are talking. I think it helps me to sleep more soundly at night.
The Internet is no longer an escape from reality.
Reality has become an escape from the Internet.
The internet delays reality and, at worst, replaces it.
Go play outside
My next tattoo on my shaft
It never was. You can't escape reality by participating in reality.
100% agree. Which is probably one of the reasons today's musicians, actors and superstars are for the most unknown and have their own extremely niche following. Most people are completely unaware of what the pulse of our society or culture is at the moment. Everyone's in their own echo chamber. That's why we can't come to definitive conclusions on any of our problems. Possibly why I think we'll never experience a rebellion or revolution.
absolutely
It'll take a drastic event to stop this ball from rolling, that's for sure.
@@xAudiolithnor even that, maybe an apocalyptic event, maybe
"Possibly why I think we'll never experience a rebellion or revolution."
The function of the internet is to psychically dominate you, bludgeon and intimidate you into believing someone else's reality bubble. There's nothing "democratic" about the internet, unless you consider a mass of people screaming louder and louder until we're in a nihilistic, toxic culture.
A big problem is there are are no geographical music "scenes" anymore... Centred on a real, physical place like a club or bar where everyone in the area hangs out, and there's a friendly rivalry between bands and artists that drives their creativity. You look at any era defining band, artist or genre from the 1950s to the 2000s, and they pretty much all had that in common.
Today what we have are extremely niche, algorithmically governed, online "communities", with followers spread all over the globe so there can never be any real, physical interaction. There's no cross-pollination between different genres to create anything new and unique. Everything is just locked into these pre-defined lanes.
Used Tubes blocking my comments hard lately.
Edit: shocked that this got through. Even the mildest critique of the normie status quo is being blocked. Can't have the blu3 pill3r wallets wake up to the grift.
Same here, even benign random stuff.
As if the algorithm says: "Delete everything this guy posts!
He is a danger to society and might inspire a rebellion of free thinkers with his bigoted sense of humor!" 🤖
Yep: just happened to me too. My longer comment with substance was blocked, my fluff comment is visible. I'll try to post my longer comment here.
Same
Come on bro! You're not supposed to be provocative on this wholesome platform, be more nice! xd
Nice Joe Rogan/Matt Walsh clip to drive home your point. Not that Walsh hasn't broached an important topic or two, but to forthrightly state in a stentorian baritone that "millions of kids are taking hormone blockers" but then Jamie finding stats showing about 4,000 kids a year start taking these hormone blockers shows an extreme disconnect. Fear-mongering + stat padding ramped up and up and up = more converts.
SIDE!? Side?! I'm not on anyone's side! Because, no one is on MY side! - a tree
Not just a tree.... Treebeard
Treepube.
This is why I GTFO of the military.
I'm on MY side.
It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Twilight Zone.
The signpost up ahead - your next stop, the Twilight Zone!
Hold on, let me light a cig
It’s darkest before the dawn, and the sun is just setting.
My favorite is: buckle up, we've only just left the parking lot.
Hell is coming. The living will envy the dead.
If you make people think that they're thinking, they love you. If you make people think, they hate you.
Lots of people can't even think lol, they don't have internal monologue so when you say it like"think about it"he had no clue of that concept.
@@fs5866 I would agree with you there.
@@fs5866 whatever delusion feels good to assume is what they feel is thinking. These people are also playing the game of, "the burden of proof lies with the accused who are guilty until proven guilty". Just keep away from the herds of them. Mass hysteria is a real, prevalent, and very dangerous social problem destroying modern civilization.
@@fs5866 wow, I hope society recovers from this piece of crap it has been lately.
It’s been forever since I watched you. I don’t know what the hell happened to all the MGTOW content on the internet, let alone RUclips, but I’m glad to see you’re still putting out thought provoking discussions.
I’ve taken a big break from social media, and man oh man the world has changed so fast
What happened to mgtow?
@@user-vn8gi9hu1c
Nothing. Still there, alive and kicking. But maybe often not using the key word.
@@user-vn8gi9hu1c They got infiltrated by globalists.
@@user-vn8gi9hu1c The bodies go, but the minds stay.
@@user-vn8gi9hu1c I think they might be referring to the multiple MGTOW channels that have been de-monetized and classified as hate speech. I haven't been following it often, but just something I've stumbled upon.
Just a Theory got me. Even the theory of gravity is "just a theory". Yet we do not float around...
It’s strange because I find so many people cannot produce a sentence or make a joke. When you talk they look away and when you don’t talk they ask what’s the matter.
Instead of making a joke or random statement ask a question it’s less awkward for the other person. Keep in mind that’s the way the world is now especially the gen z.
@@RealistRatRaceThe aftermath of Covid has scuffed everyone's social capabilities.
Ok, so this actually blew my mind. Tucker's insane scientific illiteracy was tuly disheartening.
Tuly.
Are you surprised?
That's why Putin made sure to at least educate him on entirety of Russian history in his interview, hah.
Screw science. Take the Kaczynski/Ellul/Evola/Guenon pill. Technology is the problem. Science enables technology. Science and technology separate us from our fundamental human nature and make life nihilistic and intolerable. The greater the material wealth, the more nihilistic life becomes. I want to RETVRN to a world where people believe in things like witchcraft, the Divine Right of Kings, God created the world in seven days 4000 years ago... I'm liable to die from dysentery because no one know how public sanitation works or what the germ theory is...
People like Tucker have talking head syndrome: because he's relatively good (or, rather, successful) in one field (political commentary?) he thinks he is qualified to opine on a range of other topics he has virtually no knowledge about. The internet is full of these characters. Jordan Peterson, anyone?
I sign on to Barbarossa's visionary predictions on population decline and the rise of Transhumanism... Everything he has predicted is coming to pass. That's reality, and we are on the threshold of it.
THE Bar bar?? Has he posted lately?
@@tarico4436 Sadly no... He has yet to return to us.
But Stardusk, Lazarus, Solitaire, and myself try to carry on his message as best we can.
@@tarico4436 ..no, I don't think he's posted a video in years now
Does he have a RUclips Channel? Bar was visionary for sure.
Spetsnaz was another.
Get Well Soon
Everyone’s got a lot of borrowed thoughts about things but little first hand experience or knowledge. And the things people talk about, even if they appear as deep and meaningful, are a thin veil to the deep subconscious of experience and reality we all grapple with and dare not speak of.
Exactly we are too afraid of saying our deep stuff and being our true selves in this blue pulled society. That's why we feel so atomized, cause you can't share with people your true thoughts
My comments are always deleted. No matter how much I remove derogative terms.
youtube has one of the most sophisticated shadow ban algorithms
Maybe your comments aren't as important as you believe
@@raptorhandz Shut up you Chinese bot
@@raptorhandz I think that's not true. If I write a nothing comment, it posts. But a lot of my more sophisticated comments are censored. Others write that the same thing happens to them.
I think it keeps a record of which accounts have a history of posting non-kosher comments, so some have lower standards of removal.
We need to support the “right to be forgotten”.
I wonder if technology will ultimately enable different groups to live segregated lives within the same geographical area. Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age might turn out to be a very prescient novel.
That's exactly my prediction. But I didn't know this book was about that. I probably should read it. Thanks.
I'll never understand why some people admit that adaptation exists but not evolution. If adaptation exists, then if enough generations had passed you would eventually see either an extinct species or an entirely new one that is adapted to its new environment. It's so strange to pay lip service to adaptation but not take that idea to its logical conclusion.
There is an excellent vid here on YT called “why nothing has changed since 1999” and omg it ia actually spot on the money. The guy basically says that, as we all know, the 1920s up until the 1990s every decade had a “culture, defining music, style, etc etc” Whats worse is, we are as far away from 2000 as 1976 was back in 2000, that shocked me… like what!? I’m about to turn 32, born 1992, so LUCKILY got to experience the 90s and the 2000s as a kid then teen. It truly felt like a different era… anyway go check out the vid, the main reason is obviously the internet, from 2000 (apart from the spillover 90s vibe) until now, we absolutely have NO defining fashion, music, basically everything you think of when thinking of each decade in the 1900s, and it’s SO true. It’s horrible and no wonder Gen Z are the most nostalgic group so far, think about how many 80s related things in pop culture are and have been about for years now… I digress. Go check out, “why nothing has changed since 1999”… if you are a millennial like me, it is unbelievably true, but everyone will agree, regardless of age.
Great / iconic illustration!
SNR - signal / noise ratio; filtering through the crap is becoming a necessary skill in modern internet usage.
1. First time I hear that tucker clip with Joe R. I feel sad for anyone who listens to crap like that and actually believes these clowns.
2. On having a shared reality that will allow us to solve larger problems, we have so many bullshit peddlers like tucker nowdays where their whole point of existence is to gum up the pipes with impossible amounts of bullshit. It's not going to be an easy battle.
Who/what created Tucker and gave him that objective?
Well I think Rogan's podcast gives a lot of good perspectives and information, but it's also not a scientific board and the best they have for researching in the moment is Jamie looking stuff up on google real quick. So obviously there's going to be a lot of misunderstandings and false information alongside the good stuff. Just good for people to be able to watch and know the difference or at least not take everything at face value.
What specific 'conspiracy theory' has he, or Alex Jones, wrong about?🤔
@@shogunofharlem8240 Trolling hard my friend.... Trolling hard.
"First time I hear that tucker clip with Joe R. I feel sad for anyone who listens to crap like that and actually believes these clowns."
That's basically the entire internet. The increasing censorship and slow but sure attempt to lockdown the whole internet is a function of the system, of the social organism. There's only two options: top-down censorship by the elites, forcing one unified worldview on everyone (a dystopia); or a mass of screaming people each pushing a reality bubble worldview that is more and more disconnected from reality (another dystopia).
People now like to talk about and praise "independent journalists" - but there are no independent journalists. They are all talking heads: all trying to convince you to subscribe to their nutty version of reality. Tucker doesn't believe in evolution, Joe Rogan seems to change his worldview from one guest to the guest, Jimmy Dore deliberately doesn't understand the danger of global warming, Russel Brand seems mostly concerned with his own ego than your wellbeing... I could go on and on and on and on. Sure - overall - they're better than the elites' lies, and you can still get much useful information out of them, but they're all trending in the same direction. The internet is a disaster for the human race.
The violent and loud few have always dominated the peaceful and quiet masses. Oh giant meteor, kindly bless us with your devastation. 😅
Celestial oppression.
Liberating us from technocrats and young hamm youth campus.
this is certainly a useful tool if you want to stay in power. everyone squabbles and argues and bickers, and you sit there laughing while continuing to feed off their labour, their fear, their desires.
I sound like a sith lord don't I
@antimatteranon
That's too simplistic of a view on the matter.
On some issues, perhaps most even yes, on others they'd much rather have the public largely ignorant or agreeing in unison on in the subject matter.
They've demonstrated clearly over the last decade that they view freedom of expression among common people to be a great danger to them for this very reason and shutting it down is an attempt (probably futile at that) at being able to direct attention and sow calamity/public discourse only on the topics and in the ways which they approve.
@@hollowgonzalo4329 i never said i was trying to see the whole picture lol
Parmenides (The father of Logic): There is only ONE unchangable reality, all other things are just illusions.
He didn't say if that's our perceived reality though.
Don't forget your vitamins there, Starbroski
Thank you Lord of Iron. You are the light of inspiration I always return to!
@@thinking-ape6483 happy to help, King.
Get a room.
@@funkymunkyI hope it’s a hotel room, so I can sit on the cuck chair and watch
I am rich and successful in my own reality. Sadly this other reality differs. I can't get no satisfaction or consensus.
The internet is essentially the spirit world made manifest.
Have you seen Serial Experiments Lain? It's an interesting exploration of the intersection between web and world. Groundbreaking at the time.
And you don't seem to understand
A shame you seemed an honest man
Shame it got coopted by 50%ers
Great series, especially the way it predicted the rise of social media (through the Wired) and it's extremely addictive / toxic nature.
No. It's a voluntary return to Plato's cave, masquerading as a republic.
Puberty blockers have existed since the 1980's, at 5k over 44 years that's about 120 a year. That's such a low number that drug wouldn't even be in production anymore. I don't know what the numbers are, I can't find accurate numbers they're all over the place, but I'll tell you this, whatever amount of children use puberty blockers it needs to be WAY higher than that if it's been in production that long.
@user-jx1th8jz6y
The vast majority of the individuals prescribed them historically speaking have been adults though because I don't think it was even legal until recent year's, let alone a socially acceptable or widely known about thing.
@@hollowgonzalo4329 adults don't need puberty blockers, they're adults, puberty is already done
I understand we are all wildly flawed and often repeat dogmas we don't understand, but I'm going through a period of "I have no heroes anymore". Perhaps I hold people to a standard of intellectual honesty that's too high, but some of my favorite cultural commentators have said things so outrageous that I've become completely turned off from society/culture debate.
Wow that comment by Tucker is really disappointing. The evangelical types will eat it up, obviously.
It's very strange how people will accept that there can be a couple percent genetic change over 5-10 million years (which Tucker calls adaptation here), but think that much larger changes over 3.5 billion years is inconceivable.
@@steve112285they believe the earth is 6000 years ols
'Adaptations', literally evolution lol
@@steve112285wouldn't we have, or have a reasonable expectation of fossil records of said major changes over those billions of years? Doesn't appear that we have anything close that would indicate evolutionary change on that level you're inferring.
evolution was admitted false by the same guy who proposed the idea
Great points. We need to be more even keel as a society... everyone swing way to far to one side of all arguements.
Absolutely true. I seem to spend increasing time trying to deprogram people around me who have succumbed to internet mind-viruses. Internet time is inversely proportional to outside real-life time. Yet, here I am absorbing a RUclips video. Yes, I am aware of the irony.
"Tucker Carlson's mouthpiece is more important as a source of information than any scientist, historian, doctor, anyone with any credentials, authority, or experience"...
Like the CDC, WHO, FBI, NIH, the media, the medical community, the experts.
Though this is not the point of your video, I do want to speak to the issue of a person like Tucker Carlson. I can't speak for everyone, but I listen to him and don't "believe everything he says". I assess using my own critical thinking what is likely to be true and what is not. I know that the authorities are lying to me. I have no reason to believe Carlson is intentionally lying, though he might be wrong about any given subject matter and is often the first person to say so. It's up to each of us to decide what is true based on the available evidence from many sources, not appeals to authority or status.
The problem is those with authority and status have completely undermined their credibility in the last few years, and not "accidentally" but willfully and for nefarious motives. The age of blind trust is OVER.
I have become acutely aware that one can speak very intelligently on a specific topic while being incredibly ignorant otherwise. It is dubious to gain a favorable impression of someone and stop vetting their claims.
Also, Baudrillard's text is tortuously circumlocutory. He could have summed it up in a paragraph, but it became a book because he just enjoyed listening to himself so much.
Lol. True. I am not sure even Baudrillard knew what he was talking about. Just talking/writing to hear himself talk.
That's why you can't trust writers, they have to write and write.
Have you met an academic?
I think most writers have that issue, it’s part of the reason why I don’t read as much as I probably should.
He took a page out of Kant.
May the Gods bless your sore throat Stardusk
Games industry lay offs is a very real-world thing for a lot of people.
As for the tucker, I used to like his stuff, but lately, i wonder if his rich ass has been sewing division since occupy Wall Street.
I am not American, so I could be way off.
Its always been one reality. Its just an illusion of disconnection.
Perceiving the one reality in different ways, or only seeing different aspects of it.
I understand people's opposition to scientism and the "I fucking love science" rejects, but when people start driveling on about there being no evidence for evolution, and start saying dinosaurs weren't real, they've completely lost me.
There is ZERO evidence for macroevolution. And zero evidence for the Big Bang. If the "science"community actually admitted their presuppositional faith in finding miraculous answers to origin questions they cannot answer, I might take them more seriously.
Micro evolution is well documented and observable. Macro evolution is a MDMA fueled joke.
Darwin also believed we all came from Africa. Do you also accept that??
There is no evidence for Dinosaurs.
Evolution is the perfect theory. There is no hard evidence that it happened and it cannot be practically tested, only written about. I put it in the sane place as the multiverse theory. There is 0 evidence and it cannot be practically tested, only written about. And anyone who questions this ''scientific lore" is a fool for not believing the Lore.
"but when people start driveling on about there being no evidence for evolution, and start saying dinosaurs weren't real, they've completely lost me."
These people are grifters. They sense an opportunity, a potential niche market for their brand of reality. More and more people doubt the elites' narrative... so people like Tucker Carlson (who can and do do good work at other times) sense that a lot of people will be more receptive to anyone offering an alternative narrative. He's not even really a journalist - he's a talking head. People now believe that talking heads are journalists. I have serious questions about the theory of evolution. But he's just read some religious tracts and thinks that he's a better scientist than scientists. How is this different to people who watch a few youtube videos and think they know philosophy, or nuclear physics or how biology works? It's insane, and this is become more and more and more common.
Idk if George Floyd is hyper reality. The kid that was lynched to death during the civil rights movement was also given the reverence George Floyd but it was the 60s pre internet/smarthphones.
Hyper reality is a fancy post-modernist term for 'Lies'.
I love the French accent Stardusk.
Seems to have German aggression behind it.
@@ranfan1820And a smidge of Belgian misanthropy.
Great video! This one stands high in the Thinking Ape catalog. I hope there's another 2 hour live stream with a worthy guest on this topic. Huzzah.
I've observed this phenoma as well, how there’s no consensus about anything anymore, everyone treats reality as subjective.
The irony is that I'm pretty sure that Tucker was once a single egg cell which got fertilized by a sperm and then was two cells - then 4 cell - then 8 cells - and eventually a zygote - and on and on he seamlesslessly became a human being. How could he have missed such an obvious fact about biological growth?
when the egg is fertilized by the sperm, the 2 cells are now a zygote
at the 8 cell stage the dividing, fertilized egg is a blastocyst
The cellular development of an embryo doesn't prove macro-evolution. Procreation and birth are fixed processes that have no evolutionary precursor.
This was a reddit-tier argument. Do better please
Cells that already existed and were created by a living sperms entering a egg the idea this happened by magic in the sea is nonsesne
Idk about you, but without the internet I would have never been able to access a society with an iq higher than 80 as is the average in the eastern european country I was born in.
The internet here is mainly just facebook and for zoomers and younger, tiktok.
However, on the actual internet there is a real lack of any communities where people from my country are present in any sizeable percentage.
What country were you born in?
@@bloodstripeleatherneck1941 Romania
Quick general search says Romania is 87...that still sounds too low, how is it Poland, Georgia, Armenia and Egypt (randomly picked) are listed at 98? Wiki says " Romania is a high-income country,[20] with a very high Human Development Index[14] and a highly complex economy,[21] that is emerging to be a middle power in international affairs." 80 is like almost retard IQ.
@@Anton43218 I love Romanians! We had some stationed at our base in Iraq back in 06. They thought U.S. Marines were cool, and would ask to get their picture taken with us. Good times 😆🤙
@@bloodstripeleatherneck1941 you like them because they acted so nice to you, like they were starving africans and you were wealthy foreigners. They acted that way due to you having actual equipment and not having to improvise almost everything due to your superiors stealing funds and equipment.
Thanks for another video. Don't be sick for too long.
Nice Joe Rogan/Matt Walsh clip to drive home your point. Not that Walsh hasn't broached an important topic or two, but to forthrightly state in a stentorian baritone that "millions of kids are taking hormone blockers" but then Jamie finding stats showing about 4,000 kids a year start taking these hormone blockers shows an extreme disconnect. Fear-mongering + stat padding ramped up and up and up = more converts.
I'll tell you this, if you looked up the average price of puberty blocking treatment, and divided it by the profit of the puberty blocker industry, I bet you it'd at least come out to hundreds of thousands thinkingape, I bet my left jewel.
Just in case, better bet your left nipple. You never know if you have to fullfill a bet.
@@DrLicuid I'm all in, rod, jewels and nips.
on the subject of reality and propaganda/brainwashing , I highly recommend a documentary video on youtube called Beyond Torture The gulag of Pitesti.
It was one of the Soviet's most extreme attemp at creating the new soviet man , and I believe that there can be a lot of parallels that can be drawn with today.
Especially with how the prisoners torture each other and are constantly kept on the brink between sanity and insanity.
Für den algo. Falls es was bringen tut.
Habt Dank, Edler Herr!
This is a beautiful episode, well done.
New watcher of yours. First, I find this video and concept very relevant. Basically, even from Europe (France baise ouais), American cultural and sociological "debates"/"issues" are imported there through social media. Recently, after the overturn of Roe v Wade, the French government enshrined abortion in Constitution, even though abortion, as important as it is, has no place in the Constitution. Or rather, the French Constitution does not have the role to enshrine abortion.
Going back to our import of your problems through your (US) soft power: X, Facebook, TikTok, all this garbage. An increasingly high number of young people are raised on social media. As such, it is logical that internet speech and content would become more proeminent in society. In REAL LIFE. The domain of life we thought was separate from "internet bullshit" until now. Despite what I just said, for nuance's sake, it still is, somewhat. But, it depends on your surroundings.
On the matter of truth and acknowledging common facts, Internet is filled with bullshit and gaslighting. The limits of scientific consensus, of commonly admitted facts, of the scientific method itself, is really demostrated by the speed at which topics advance and how slow and humble (good) research and researchers are. Internet has connected people, and knowledge too. Furthermore, in this dark hour of partisanship, the matter of academic partisanship and corruption also contribute to muddying the waters. As such, we have no certainty on anything, or at least, since establishing certainties, and acquiesing on facts has become impossible.
Besides, Internet is made up of anonymous people. It has made it easier for anyone to become a lot more partisan and aggressive than they would be IRL. People on the internet dare to say stuff they would never say IRL. Now, they may increasingly do IRL too. I can imagine, even on French university campus women agreeing to it. They may have had "regular" opinions on the gender debate in the past, but hyperreality is the phenomenom of the growing influence of internet on people and societies. Hence, it also changes people's beliefs. The Overton window in France, and everywhere in the Western world really, the so-called "western democracies", is stretching to the extremes of both sides (our far-right is the equivalent of your puritan republican side while our far-left is the equivalent of your woke democrat side in the US). But the left (and the far-left woke stuff) which would rather side with misandry is the "camp of progress" so it is not surprising that it ends up being more socially acceptable.
If we can't agree, we can't move forward. I really hate the idea that the world has kind of adopted the rules of religion and politics, meaning that now there are several incredibly heavy topics that people choose not to speak on unless they feel they're surrounded by people who agree.
We basically just have a bunch of camps that never exchange opinions, feelings or information and only push for it in order to get more. For example, feminism typically never crosses swords peacefully with the opposite sex unless it is in an effort to gain ground. Things like mentor her too. Identities typically only leave their hives to gain ground too, and come with others brandishing the appropriate flag in order to be shielded from perfectly reasonable criticism due to their methods. I'm sure the current dei and baby groups will only cross territories to gain ground too. And if they preach safety and their version of equality, everyone who opposes them on a surface level appears to be bad...
For me, what we're seeing is the same tactic being used over and again by different marginalized groups because we typically conduct ourselves privately. Back when groups were more public, sharing someone's shady tactics didn't come down to aggressive screenshots or even videos for context. So there are probably countless instances of groups trying to bully their way into others in the same way "diversity" has basically infected streaming entertainment media. But because we're all apart... we can't continue.
Definitely. People just don't hear other opinions and/or don't want to listen to them. To me this is bizarre, because how can you create a detailed point of view if all you know is just reinforcing your own beliefs? But this also creates isolation, so that when you encounter someone with a different position on a topic, you instantly start getting defensive.
This makes it much easier to manipulate people because these small groups can't pose that serious of a threay
Love these high quality videos.
Me waiting on the Missing Link to be found 💀
I am hopeful. As it gets harder there will energe solutions, ctique, hope on the likes we have not seen. Tradtional values are being upheld and resisting the waves of changes forced in the name of progressivism.
Tucker Carlson represents the entitled caucus that never had to endure any real hardships in life. All he really does is brag about how he doesn't have to fly chartered when he travels.
Anyways, I enjoy listening to your talks on here, your perspective is critical and sound, just what our hyper reality needs more of.
Big Brother is about to kick our asses.
The reality is we don't talk about certain realities without anonymity. The Internet provides this fantastically........ to a degree. The outside world you can't say certain things whereas with the online world you've got a little more freedom among the strangers you talk with, strangers who often have similar opinions to you unlike those you know in the real world who would likely disagree with you and cause trouble over your views
That Tucker interview was kind of interesting. There’s a tiny grain of truth in what he was saying. There is a lot we don’t know about the mechanisms of evolution, because we have never directly observed speciation in animals…the process by which one species gives rise to a new species through adaptation and/or mutation, such that the new species can no longer reproduce with the old species. One would assume this is because speciation is a process that occurs very slowly.
We also have never observed Earth going a full circle around the Sun from outside perspective.
@@Apjooz not a perfect analogy but ok.
That's not actually true though. We have observed speciation in rainforest frogs. Evolution is not always slow, that is a huge misconception about it. The root problem here isn't science (which is solid af) it's xtians CLINGING to the frayed and obnoxious LIES about God, an afterlife, souls, judgement etc. THEY CANT ACCEPT the world we live in so they are constantly trying to justify their own delusions with what they think is plausible
Evolution takes so long that by time we can confidently say that there are new species - original species usually become obsolete and die out.
Also, there are plenty of cases (birds in particular) where related species that are considered to be separate can produce fertile offspring, but that rarely happens naturally. Because animals are usually picking their mate based on traits that are prevalent in their own species, other species are simply unattractive to them.
Only human with it's abstract thinking and curiosity would think of intentionally crossing different species and seeing the result.
The whole accident world life universe and excuse time is the biggest commie lefttard woke I'm god I'm superior shit ever its not a accident there is no magical explosion fusd by nothing fueled by nothing into existence by accident noa Mount of TIME WATEER NOCKING AGAIN ROCKS IN TNE SEA AND PARTICLES FLOATING AROUND WOULD MAKE A CELL THEN 2 THEN 3 AND THEN DINOSURES THEN MEN its utterly retarded to even suggest that another lefie grip rt god hate is the whole micros on Mars and life on Europe BULLLLLLLLLLL SHITTTT
my comments blocked and deleted by used tube.
Censorship works to demoralize contributors.
No certain words are just filtered, and after 20 seconds they will automatically disappear.
@@-______________________Can confirm. And conform.
I would contend that there has never been consensus, per se. That the idea of consensus is merely conditioning and habits, as they express across time. Your description of reality is, to me, describing experience and praxis.
I would also say I am on the side of the Idealists, in only the sense that there is a hidden, indescribable and ineffable substructure upon which our experiences are written. Reality is, but we cannot say what it is. It is the finger pointing to the moon that is the best we can do.
It’s true ,the hype is more important the truth and the consequences.
StarDusk is absolutely on point here 👍
The reality meta is probably more fallible than the online meta though due to limited access to different ideas, arguments, data, strategies, tactics etc. Although there are instances of people online having perspectives that are really “off”, you really gotta compare that to your average Normie-speak. I’d take online any day of the week.
12:40 I disagree with this Tucker Carlson gave an explanation that there are no fossile records of transition species
I wonder if you care to share your thoughts on the "Abysmal Share" if any, and if it is applicable to the state of modern civilization in your opinion.
Hang in there bro
the 6th is not at all what the tea vee news portrayed it to be, that is a fact for sure. I wasn't watching those places at the time but I was aware via youtube what those places were talking about.
My insurrections are also often misunderstood.
Nothing on the news is what it seems.
@@Apjooz if you're implying it was one you don't fully grasp what the term means, joking or not. 9/10th the truth is in jest.
@@Bawkr Did Trump win or lose the 2020 elections?
@@Apjooz Pink A
You are appealing to authority, Re Tucker Carlson and Evolution.
After the last several years, I do not understand how anyone can still do that.. and the irony of doing so within the context of Hyper-Reality .. is quite staggering, lol.
It's not true that people in 1820 didn't hear about similar stories, it just took like a year. There are examples of it happening in fact. U can't just stay stuff if you don't know.
Love the French accent. Have a speedy recovery
Brilliant video. Thanks. Nice to see some of the bullshit on both right and left called out.
Is Hyperreality in its meaning - Information?
Easily accessed Information?
Where its consumption leads to Hyperreality.
Where Hyperreality is non existent but exists only after Information has been consumed.
Social Media needs to be banned or at least heavily curtailed if we are to survive.
Watch "Serial Experiments Lain".
I could never get into that one.
@Dystopian.Future you're not trans, that's why. It's also a bit overrated, ghost in the shell and the matrix did it better.
@@ubcroel4022 Haha! what are you talking about, bro? First, GITS and Matrix are very different. Second, Experiments are very slow burn, so not for stupid people. And regarding trans, I have no idea what you mean 🤔
@@almari3954
The only connection I could see, would be that autistic children are more likely to be manipulated into that kind of confusion.
I watch "Love! Live!" for the waifus. Rin is best girl
This is a comment to help you put with the algo
It is impossible to hold a belief in human rights, or even in "humanity" as a concept, and still believe in Evolution.
We're gonna make it bros. Never give up.
The issue with Tucker is that more likely he attacked your worldview that you have committed to and cannot adapt to a world where evolution is not a viable theory.
Random chance assembly of organic molecules bringing about the first life is a bankrupt idea. I think you should reexamine your assumptions.
You are confusing abiogenesis with the evolutionary origin of species.
Evolution is basically random mutation and NON-random natural selection (environmental pressure).
Mutations happen. No one denies this. Most mutations are a disadvantage to the organism. But some allow
the organism to better adapt, live longer, and produce more offspring. Some of those offspring will have the same
advantageous adaptation.
@@reasonablespeculation3893 even if I would grant that life just sprung up miraculously , I still do not grant that there is any evidence that random mutations bring about any new information, and new species. This idea has been conclusively demonstrated as false. Any "new species" was already a subset of the dominant species whose traits which they already contained in their DNA expressed more dominantly in the new environment. The common example is the false idea that some bacteria evolved to be more resistant to antibacterials etc. this is not true. There was already a subset of bacteria within the population that was resistant and as the dominant variant died off the subset became dominant.. no new variations and it was a loss of information not a gain. This isn't evolution this is adaptation from environment pressures.
@@DJ-hy8wf life did not "spring up miraculously". Organic Chemistry is natural a phenomena.
Mutations are changes. All possible mutations Did Not already exist when the first bacterium emerged. The resistance to antibiotics we see today involves bacteria that has been evolving for 3 billion years.
.....ok...
All documentation on fossils of each stage of evolutionary theorim...
Including notes and living people to conduct experiments upon said debates...
So you’re disagreeing with Tucker Carlson on evolution because you have an evolutionary scientific background and understand the subject matter to the degree that you can call him or consider him to be unworthy of opinion? Dude, your echo chamber is severe.! I’ve listened to greater minds than yours with much deeper backgrounds on several subjects related to evolution and you don’t hold a candle. But hey, this is America. You can have an opinion even if it is wrong.!
🎧
Let people have their reality, the actual reality will establish itself despite their stupidity
Nope. Think witch burnings...
"She turned me into a newt!...👀
well I got better".
I was pretty disappointed with that Tucker segment, and there are other things I don't think he has right, but he does at least ask questions of the government.
He should stay in his lane. He knows absolutely nothing about evolutionary biology.
Only 8 bit games make me happy now.
Have you questioned the theory of evolution? Its actually very counter intuitive
Its a theory. Its not real. It does however support the idea that we've been here for hundreds of thousands of years. Such BS.
We were put here to create paradise. Man, did rampant egos ruin that or what.
@@RobBillyBob we are here. Everything else is pure speculation
Mimetic desire.
of the 8 billion people on the planet how many of them do you think believe in evolution?
everyone who studied it, and understands how it works
@@reasonablespeculation3893 ignoring all the criticisms of Darwin's theory, what percent of people on earth accept it as true and factual?
It's a good theory but there's so many holes in it. And NO I'm not a deist.
I belive in code creation and result evolution of a programmed celll being yes a acidental cell that became a dibosure because time and started from nothing is such a GRIFT
Humanity was a mistake anyway
Tucker supports Trump…hence small intellect, big ego.
Omfg I can’t, when you speak french with the most despicable french accent xD Use an international french accent for the love of all things T_T
Good point, Ape.
Agreed, bonobo.
Un tableau plus précise de l'état actuel des mœurs sociales est brossé par cette émission en ligne Whatever que par ces célébrités numériques la presentrice Candace Owens et la chanteuse Megan thee Stallion.
I heard that quote from Tucker Carlson somewhere else, and when I did the meager respect that I had for him just cratered. The problem with it, aside from it being a standard and long cultivated conservative christian line of thought, is that there is nothing even based sufficiently in reality in it to even have a starting point for refutation.
You living on germany isnt?, how's the islamization going on there?. Are full zones of parasyte islamists starting to apply islamist values in the streets, schools and the way people interact to each other?
J'adore quand tu parles français.
Whatever podcast is reality more than Candace Owens and Megan thee stallion.
There’s nothing wrong with what Tucker said on evolution. Criticize him on his stance on white identity and J power
There is. He conflated two different concepts.
What he said about evolution is wrong. It has not been disproven. Evolution is simply an observation of changing traits in life over a period of time.
What has been challenged is Darwin's theory of "natural selection" as a cause for this process because we are unable to confirm any cause-effect relationship for his theory.
@@inthegutterstaringathestars now you’re just knit picking. Who cares about Tucker’s stance on Creationism he’s not a theologian and this doesn’t dis credit him. The guy is a self proclaimed ‘truth teller against power’ yet doesn’t call out the lionists, that’s what makes him sus
@@heritagefirst It is nit-picking to point out the correct terminology to describe certain concepts?
Is it nit-picking that you are using Creationism to describe the concept of god creating the universe rather than religion which is a catch-all term including Creationism?
Word have meaning or they don't? When did this become nit-picking?
Everything Tucker said was wrong. He has no idea what he's talking about. Shameful, that a professional
journalist is not clever enough to Know when he DOESN'T Know.
@@inthegutterstaringathestarshe doesn't understand a difference between what he believes as fact, and observable scientific facts that aren't subject to anyone's belief or opinion.
I don't BELIEVE in things. The scientific method is why I don't have to, but these NPCs have the nerve to chuckle when they frame science as a faith based religion. I hate them. They are a huge liability.
Glad Tucker fully exposed his credibility on that JRE episode, with the alien stuff too.. Sadly it seems like a lot of people are this limited.