Or "teach Men it's wrong to rape"...............clearly someone doesn't understand an actual rapist cares more about their intentions than whether the act in question is right or is wrong. I get the feeling some of the Women who use that cliche are a little too empathetic to monsters.
@@elijahwilson1422 that phrase is so stupid, even psychopaths know what they do are wrong, the thing is that they don't care. lets not ask what the real purpose of rape is on nature, something says that the survival of the species is more important than the desire of individuals or the super high pickyness of woman. the irony of monogamy being what defends against the savagery of our instincts. Men don't need to teach men how to treat woman, we used to do that before feminism freaked the nuclear family model. Who do you think created the family and put woman in the altair, literally ? it was man. Protection of the family was something we used to taught our sons, but that's bad because its masculinity and feminism wants weak families because they want freedom from responsibility to society. Woman were the ones that don't know how to treat anyone like adults.
My heaviest moment of disillusionment as a young angry feminist was watching the episodes of Men Vs Women Survivor/Island type shows which can be found on RUclips. It was eye opening to see a what was essentially a sociological experiment in real time, stripped of all culture and innovation, watching male and female nature express itself in a natural setting when isolated from one another. These things stood out to me the most: 1. Men's greatest strength was the ability to form a rapid social consensus and make a reasoned plan in short time, getting straight to building and tasks without much leadership as if abstract problem solving was purely instinctual. Regardless of cultural, rural or metropolitan background, every male possessed the spacial intelligence to manipulate the environment to their survival needs. The men would then catch and slaughter the small wild pigs on the island in order to cook and eat them, showing no guilt or conscience in order to survive. 2. Women's greatest strength was the adopting, nurturing and caring of the little wild pigs, as if they were their own children. Their compassion for the animals was second to none, and every woman intuitively understood this without being taught or instructed. Not a single woman would push down that maternal instinct in order to kill and a cook a pig, and any foraged food they did gather they would feed the little pigs rather than feed themselves, as if on pure instinct. That maternal instinct was so powerful and enveloping that It did not logically occur to the women that the pigs were already capable of foraging their own food before they all arrived on the island. The women struggled to form any solid consensus or plan across multiple days, ending up incredibly frustrated and resentful at one another, but were unable to quite peice together why the leadership vacuum was never filled. Eventually shelter and fire was built by individual Katniss-Everdeen-type rural women who had already picked up those skills elsewhere in the real world and chose to detach themselves from the group. After watching this play out, so much of our civilization and its working components made clearer sense to me. Everything from traditions, to art, social stigmas, language, ideaology, veganism, environmentalism, technology.. It was an 'aha' moment that has personally brought me a lot of peace. This information did not turn me into a rigid gender-roles traditionalist, it simply allowed me to see that Patriarchy is just a euphamism for Civilisation, and Matriarchy is a synonym for family. No matter how many edgy PHD's we want to write on the contrary, the creative male mind drives virtually every avenue of human endeavour on earth apart from social relations and the raising of the young, and no amount of protesting, social reform or pulling government levers will ever change this underlying nature.
I really like your phrasing of the “catniss Everdeen type of women” can you elaborate on the characteristics of those women and your thoughts towards them? For an example, are they more masculine and logical than most, being able to at least detach themselves from their maternal instincts, are they a rarity?
@@vianguyen1588 Firstly I think that every person has a breaking point for self-preservation. Even with a powerful love for all living things, any rational woman would reach a point of hunger so desperate they would take a knife to an animals throat. It's just a matter of which woman chooses to do it first. Secondly I think Men and Women both have a social strength that the other lacks that we almost never talk about. For men it is the ability to 'defer' to the other male's plans, balancing and sharing abstract concepts quickly and the ability to seperate the personal from the conceptual. Those men who's ideas were not chosen don't really mind as long as they are working toward the task as a secondary servant in a top-down leadership pyramid. Emerging from this comes philosophy and the social juggling of logic and reason to shift one another's perceptions and ideas. They build cognitively the same way they build physically - by building upon the previous schematic and improving it further. Emerging from this comes women's lingo of men over-explaining in relationships, as men tend to grow accustomed to information dumping all the inner neurosis of their latest theory on their male friends in hopes of a stumilating returned counter-theory. Women's social strength by contrast is what I call 'threat mapping'. We usually express it as 'gossip' in the culture - but gossip in a tribal context has survival relevance, as the social finer details of the rest of the tribe and its social affairs can highlight and help distinguish dangers and threats from inside and outside the tribe. Emerging from this came the male lingo about women being 'birds', twittering together as a collective hive when in large groups. It makes logical sense that women bearing and nurturing vulnerable children close to their breast for all of living history leave them predisposed to perceive and anticipate surrounding danger and are constantly gathering and passing along packets of information to build a social 'map' in order to stay ahead of danger. This includes anticipation of social tension and the possibility of inner-tribe violence, but also includes provisional threats such as running out of food and medicine, or detecting an impending illness. This is also why women are noticeably predisposed to take smaller medical maladies more seriously in ways that men might pass over or ignore, lest they grow larger and endanger the tribe. I know I can't prove these theories on paper, but I think that there is a tiny subset of both sexes on the ends of the bell curve who's psychology does do not align with the coresponding communication style, and these are typically show up as either exceptionally compassionate nurturing men, or reasoned and calcalutive individualist women who find gossip disorienting.
@@vianguyen1588 yes they (like katniss) are rare. or majority of modern women, they just try to imitate katniss, but in the end, they are just not even 10% katniss abilities 😁😆
My story: I was born as very gifted boy. Mind-bogglingly gifted. My mother was touched by feminism. She believed in equality. Same with my teachers, almost all of them were women. I had four sisters. Because I was very successful in school even without learning almost all chores around the home were mine. Support went to my sisters just to help them to "catch me". Similarly in school. I attention and support went to students "in need" especially to girls. How it looked like from my perspective? I was neglected and overall treated worse as a human being. I felt punished like I was doing something wrong. Especially when I was succeeding in something. It went through all my life until 20th year of my life when I totally collapsed. I went straight from studying very difficult into the most simple job in construction. What happened then? All those feministic "softhearted" women came with triumph just to celebrate victory. Finally they won. What a fantastic victory it was. Withholding love, affection and support because someone is a man, especially gifted? Only women, stupid, poor and weak need love? What kind of perverted conditional love it is? I was raised from rock-bottom by three older guys. I've got from them food, shelter and finally some love and acceptance. Maybe for the first time in my life I was treated as normal human being. No single women helped me. For me its matriarchy in nutshell. Now I'm well off reasonably but I will never allow woman to have any power over me.
@@NewfolderD I am sorry those things happened to you. I think a lot of feminist women believe that men don't have feelings or if they do, they don't matter. They assume that it's easy for all men to be successful. Your family was misled by a toxic belief system. Mine was too, which resulted in me believing that I was a feminist for some time. It took wisdom and pain for me to see the truth, and to understand that men are so very important. The people who have hurt me the most in life, hands down, have all been women. I tried relentlessly to live out my philosophy by cooperating with them and building them up as people, only to be betrayed by friends who hated me because they thought their boyfriends liked me. It broke my heart.
Women today are all emotionally abusive en masse. Frankly, women are innately emotionally abusive because of the way the creat hierarchies based off reputation destruction rather than competence. Women aren't suited for hierarchies or leadership.
@@erinbyrd5377I think its more accurate to say that women are innately dredisposed to emotionally abusing men, and feminism enables rather than suppresses this instinct. It's really not being "misled" let's be honest. It's a dark jungian shadow part of female nature. All I'm seeing from this comment is that many women are just really really stupid, or that women intrinsically do not care for men in any real regard. I'd day it's probably a mixture of both. Womens neurotic self obsession (solipsism) makes it markedly easy for them to dehumanize men.
i hope you overcome these traumas and find your peace and balance as a man, and come out of it stronger. dont let these women, nor your experiences, define you. despise them, feel anger, pity, but dont hate them. remember Our Lady and what a woman can be.
Men's *FORMAL* positions of power - which in reality were precarious positions of servitude given power in order to carry out that service - were erroneously seen as positions of power only and the responsibility part was ignored. It was a prize, a trophy, for greedy, ignorant, narcissistic drones.
@@ragsrare3771 Only in more "recent" times. Traditional government, the Thingdom, does not allow for that. Republics, Democracies, Empires, etc. are what allows for that to happen on a large scale.
Knowledge, Responsibility, Control are intertwined. You cannot control or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to know. You cannot know or properly control that which you are unwilling to be responsible for. You cannot know or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to control. Think back to when you were learning to ride a bike, drive a car, etc. - it started out shaky, uncertain, due to a lack of knowledge or skill (control). As you learned more about what you were doing and how to do it, you knew more, you were willing to be more responsible, you were able to increase your control - until you reached a point sufficient in all 3 areas that you could reliably ride the bike, drive the car, etc. Now imagine refusing any responsibility for driving the car. One way of refusal is deciding that pedestrians were targets instead of beings to be respected. You can imagine the result. How about refusing to know? Close your eyes while driving. You have no visual input with which to drive the car. What happens? How about refusing to control. Take your hands off the steering wheel while on the highway - what would happen? Power is an enormous amount of Control. That level of control requires a high level of knowledge and responsibility to maintain GOOD control. What often happens is bad control leads to bad results, the person in control doesn't want to be responsible for bad results - and the lower the responsibility, the less control, the less they are willing to know, and you see the dwindling spiral. More bad decisions happen. Fear of consequences should they lose power comes into play, so they desperately hang on for survival. And this is the best case scenario. Is it any wonder the sane people tend to avoid power, while the corrupt criminals [who have little if anything to do with responsibility] are drawn to it, if only to have power to avoid accountability for their own crimes? Benjamin Franklin said a Republic was created in 1776. It is up to us, all of us, to keep it. We have for far too long allowed the criminals to "represent" us, and look what that has wrought.
Feminism has been used to shift our societies and economies from single income families to two income families. This has enabled exponential real estate inflation and industrial production & consumption.
When I was a kid loud Feminists argued stridently that if there was a female Prime Minister of Great Britain then all wars and fighting across the globe would stop. Then Margaret Thatcher was elected in England and that particular axiom disappeared from political discourse entirely.
Imagine being dumb enough not only to believe the PM's gender mattered but also to believe Britain had any relevance to influence world affairs after 1945.
@@SubtleStair No. The patriarchy "hurts men" exactly whenever the feminist narrative needs it to "hurt men", while at the same time, the patriarchy keeps all men above women and gives men all the power, status and privilege in society, which of course, benefits men, but as before mentioned, simultaneously does THE OPPOSITE of benefiting men, whenever it needs to in order to support some feminist ideological claim. Think of it as wave function collapse in quantum mechanics, where the particle position remains a secret until the wave function collapses and reveals the nature of men's evil. Or like a coin toss where it's heads - women are victims, or tails - men are oppressors. Or a Three Card Monty game where there's a privileged sinful man hiding behind every card. There are many variations, but you get the idea.
@@etsequentia6765 patriarchy does hurt men because only top percent of men get benefits. A egalitarian one which all men get benefits is the one benefits men.
@@Knight766 sure. But both sides are focusing too much on the differences, and not enough on the similarities. I’m just trying to point to the fact that, yes we are different, but we should focus on the similarities, rather than differences. We need each other. We need to collaborate.
What feminists don't realize is that working within limitations is incredibly freeing. Limitations keep out negative things. Houses are limitations from the weather, traditional western marriage is a limitation on sexual experiences with the world, but within a marriage, it's a lot of fun.
After my dad passed, my family changed from a patriarchy to a matriarchy over night. Things very quikly went off the rails, and while my mom tried her best, she could not protect their legacy. I reflect on what went wrong often. As man, my dad knew he was expendable. Men are raised that way. The highest honour is to die protecting your family. Family comes first. My mom was more concerned about her own feelings and happyness and eventually tore our family apart with selfish decisions. She died of cancer, and squander my dads inheritance on her own indulgences. I miss my dad, and learned that men are not as expendable as I once believed.
@@lexzenis2544 so society tells you that your dad is disposable, to be discarded like a piece of rubbish once he no longer a utility? And females choose to believe what society says rather than what your own eyes show. You liked the idea that men are expendable because women think in a zero sum game, it made you feel more valued if men weren’t. Fathers are clearly wasting their time and lives on these people.
Men are expendable (to a point) in a well functioning society. Sure it sucks if its someone important to you, but the men that remain should be picking up that slack and helping the next generation grow and thrive. Society now though has been sinking deeper and deeper into the quicksand, at some point unless it does something intelligent it will collapse into anarchy.
Amen! A man and a woman in a marriage is Biblical. It is amazing how both men and women contribute to society in slightly different, yet equally important ways!
Its how victorious nations die, they can afford more, their men build more, but they don't want to be mean to their own kids so they skip the discipline.
@@dexstewart2450 - The Book covers LiFe before the existence of man & so if you become respectful & wise you may get to see your ancestors, if not, they will get to hear of you. Psalms 19: 7 - 10 Jude 14, 15; John 11: 21 - 27
Insert that one famous clip from the TV show Survivor, where the group of men are quickly able to gather food, build a fire and assemble structures to sleep in and protect from the weather. Were as the women just sit around and argue until some of them wander over to the male group.
The women couldn’t figure out how to obtain food and they “found” a piglet and instead of eating it, they adopted it and tried to name it. Meanwhile the men were hunting small alligators.
I saw this quote somewhere that perfectly encapsulated all of the divorces of people i have personally known. "Men give up their happiness for their families, Women give up their families for their happiness."
My parents divorced when I was 4. They had joint custody but my mom actually wanted me to be with my dad during the week and her on weekend. This is because she knew he would do a better job taking care of me and he most definitely was by far the more responsible parent. It wasn't 100 percent stable with my dad cause he was a young mechanic that didn't make a whole lot but definitely more stable than the chaotic life my mom was living. When I was with her she usually had a dysfunctional boyfriend and a lot of times would just leave me with my uncle so she could go out to the bars. Sometimes she would even bring me along. She's not a horrible person. She loves me and I never went hungry when I was with her but she was never responsible. She prioritized men over her kids but she would never admit that. My dad worked a lot and at times it felt like he should be around more often but he was really working hard so he could take care of me and eventually my little brother too. He was still always there and taught me responsibility, accountability, respect, and discipline. He's always been there to help me and even gave me a job that i fell in love with and will be my career. My mom never did anything for her future. Every job she had she ended up quitting. No 401k. No Ira. 55 and she has nothing cause of the decisions she made in the past. Now I'm the only one that will help her. What I'm trying to say is fathers are seen as the not so necessary parent when in actuality they are absolutely necessary and are often times the better parent.
Statistically, not enough people will read your comment for its length, but that doesn’t make it any less poignant, accurate or exemplary. As a career auto worker and a single father (with an ex who dodges accountability constantly), I would love to meet your dad, shake his hand, and share a beer with him. 🍻 ❤️ Being a good man is an uphill climb in western society. Good on you for recognizing his sacrifice and his efforts. 💪 🙌
I was lucky. My parents divorced (amicably) when I was 10. Me and my older brother lived with our mother. Our mom worked herself to the bone while always making time for us as best she could. She was always calm and collected, and when shit went down she always kept her head. When me and my brother did stupid shit all she needed to do was give us The Eye or speak with That Tone and we'd get our shit in order. She was my role model growing up. I learned how to deal with life, how to knuckle down and work hard even if it sucked, and to keep a cool head when the shit hits the fan, not from lectures or lessons, but from seeing her living example. Her one glaring weakness, both when we were growing up and now, is handling money and budgeting. I learned from that too, but as a negative example of what not to do. My dad on the other hand . . . He wasn't a bad dad, but he basically wasn't a dad at all. He was kind of a non-entity, a ghost, present but not really having any impact, during the majority of my life, even before they divorced. It's only now in my thirties and his sixties that he's trying to be a dad. Too little too bloody late, but at least he's trying, if clumsily and poorly. Pretty sure that his difficulties being a dad stem from a combination of his experience with his own very strict, very old school dad and him almost certainly being autistic. (Source: I'm a late diagnosed autistic and knowing what to look for now it seems almost certain that dad's autistic too.)
@DefaultFlame being a poor parent is definitely not unique to either gender. I've known some kids growing up with some deadbeat ass dads but had strong mothers. From my experience, however, it does seem like the kids without fathers have the biggest issues with respect and discipline.
@@vcalv9354 Yeah, I think my dad just didn't know what to do and defaulted to letting mom raise us for the most part, even when they were together. I resent him just a little bit for not really trying harder when I was growing up, but I understand why. He had an unreasonably harsh dad growing up, who only provided an example of what not to do. Combine that with undiagnosed autism and mom's excellent parenting and I can see why he just kind of coasted, settling into the role of breadwinner and nothing else. Like I said before, he wasn't a bad dad, the issue is that he wasn't really much of a dad at all, he was just kind of there. Present, but not having much of an impact.
Ages ago I did a report in middle school about suffrage and the 19th, so I interviewed my grandmother, who was a young woman at the time. I remember thinking how insane she sounded as she recounted telling my grandfather to vote against pro-suffrage candidates. She didn't want it. I did not understand for a very very long time.
I think it was also a very clear indicator of how women still very much had power with voting. When people got married, that vote the man made was typically for the betterment of the family, they usually consulted their wives on the situation, and the outcome was more or less what both of them thought was right. Could it be completely vetoed by the man? yes, but that wasn't a substantial enough part of our society to really make women have no voice at all.
@user-xs3sj3em6u The quote is complete bullshit. It's not just that Aristotle never said that. There was no republics, and democracies were lead exclusively by men.
@@uncbadguyAristotle was using old greek boomer language for Strong men masculine republic creates easy time easy time allowed soft people in feminine democracies which led to tyranny and we back at hard times
I did that with my daughter and she is so much better off for it! All of her friends struggle maintaining a healthy romantic relationship with men; and she has thrived. 🌹
That's not the problem. They are intermediate to actual children and actual adults, and societies operated accordingly for all of human history. No amount of teaching can remediate the consequences of pretending otherwise.
@@lordexdj First I tried to model proper male before towards her, always treating her like a lady unless she was doing something really harmful. Second, when she did become verbally malicious and manipulative with her brother, I warned her that girls/women have an advantage with words (and therefore, emotional manipulation). But boys/men have the physical advantage and that she needs to careful. If she ruthlessly attacks her brother verbally/emotionally, he’s eventually going to be bigger than her and use his fists. She didn’t seem worried about it at the time, but she did stop being so cruel. Of course, I taught my son to restrain his physical aggression and channel his aggression into sports or worse case scenario, destroy an object and not his sister. Within a few years, her brother was bigger and much stronger than she was. But I taught them both restraint: her to be careful with her words/emotional manipulation and for him to be careful with his physicality, because he could really hurt her without even trying.
Erin, they'll throw you out of college for this kind of blasphemy. Of course, that probably means that you are correct and that is something that has to be suppressed and destroyed. Truth and facts are anathema to the narrative and must be eliminated. I consider you heroic for espousing facts and standing up to the power of "feminism".
With respect to what you said about bonobos, the irony is that male sexuality has been increasingly vilified and effectively criminalized while sexual liberation was celebrated for women. So, it’s actually gotten much worse for men which is reflected in that fact that there’s now a large disparity between the number of men who are sexually active and the number of women who are, because far fewer men are having sex because the pursuit of sex by men is considered socially unacceptable or worse, while it is celebrated for women. This is one of the most harmful aspects of the current push for a matriarchy.
It really annoys me when "pro-sex" feminists cite bonobos. In bonobo culture, the females use sex to curb male aggression. If humans actually acted like bonobos, then women would see male anger and frustration as a signal to submit to them sexually. In other words, some incel screaming in rage that he can't get laid would trigger a bunch of women to have sex with him. Does this sound anything at all like how women actually act? No! Of course not!
Completely not the case. Pursuit of sex by men is very socially acceptable. Not only is a guy who gets laid envied by peers, but considered a 'true man'. Women prefer men with sexual experience. Trying to laid is just 'boys being boys'. The 'vilification' is of consent and what exactly that means... Because of the power differential previously, it didn't matter if the woman objected and now that's in question
@@ne0x1ty How absolutely delusional. Only male sexuality is vilified in this country because of false claims like the ones that you just made that result in false paradigms like what you said about consent. It’s not living in reality. The reality is that men can be accused of harassment and worse for pursuing sex, for expressing the desire, for looking like they want to, and they have to be on guard for getting in serious trouble for even thinking it, which is why they have to be surreptitious about it. The whole comment about power is nonsensical as well. This is not the 80s anymore. Men who get laid as you say, which speaks volumes about the shallow and cynical way that you view it, are not talked about that way anymore. They may be envied but it’s because other guys are wondering how they pulled that off without getting in major trouble.
@@ne0x1ty Absolutely not true but RUclips is protecting your lies because I refuted your claims but my comment is nowhere to be found. What you said is absolutely untrue and male sexuality is vilified and effectively criminalized, and no of what you said maps onto reality in the current year.
Oh. My. God. Erin, thank you for creating at least the second most important sociological video I've ever seen. (While being a little dry ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) in nearly the calmest, most balanced way I imagine a person could do, you showed that either men or women who push their advantages over others will cause the pain and downfall of very many. I want as many women- and men- to succeed and prosper as possible, but how unfortunate it is for the majority of people to have shown that they don't. You are a very rare teacher, and I want to say thank you so much again for your public service, please keep up the interstellar work, and take care.
"Every society rests on a barbarian base. The people who don't understand civilization, and wouldn't like it if they did. The hitchhikers. The people who create nothing, and who don't appreciate what others have created for them, and who think civilization is something that just exists and that all they need to do is enjoy what they can understand of it-luxuries, a high living standard, and easy work for high pay. Responsibilities? Phooey! What do they have a government for?" ...."and now, the hitchhikers think they know more about the car than the people who designed it, so they're going to grab the controls" ...."and they have a democracy, and they are letting the enemies of democracy shelter themselves behind democratic safeguards." ― H. Beam Piper, Space Viking
Feminism appears to be more of a way to dismantle a Nation. Let me explain: It's not 'Feminists' who are the problem, as they are just naive to the words of sneaky, 'snake-oil salesman'. While both women and men can be manipulated by, 'faulty-products' shady marketing, bad philosophy, false promises etc..(bad men).. when these products and Ideas are sold, exclusively to women, there's a weak spot where 'good men', ironically, can not help. If men are best suited to be protectors of women, in any given society or nation.. This is the week spot. Foreign Adversaries want your country to fail. Tricking women into hating their men only makes the 'bad guys' happy, as our Nation suffers as a whole.
Growing up I was always subjected to the line "If women were in charge there would be no wars". When I got old enough to have my own opinion I would bite back with lines like "If women were in charge, the world leaders cycles would all sync up and we'd have a global conflict every 28 days or so", which as you can imagine did not go down well. Then one day I decided to research female rulers throught history and found very few were not involved in a war and just as capable of commiting atrocities. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar was so cruel and barbaric that she was responsible for 50-75% of of deaths of Madagascar's population. I wrote down a long list of every queen throughout history and what they were involved in, and when I heard that line again, I read it out to them and miraculously, I never heard it again....
To anyone who thinks there would be peace if women ruled the world, I ask: have you ever seen two women who are angry at each other? Female vs female anger is more intense than any other wrath.
At the end of all things. We all simply expect men to step up. And that's really all there is to it. If men all disappeared, even the most devout feminist would still expect a man somewhere.... somehow.... to just appear and take care of something they need help with.
@@AnimalAlmighty Because women were complaining that they had to make the first move. You know. The entire point of the App. If I had to guess they didn't like being rejected instead of being the one doing the rejecting.
"If society does become a matriarchy, it's because Men would allow it to happen. All men would have to do is say 'we're stopping this social experiment' and that would be the end of it." - Spot on.
@@DaveRoberts308Are they? Where are the men's rights activists demanding equality in the selective service or male quotas for teachers? They are still being ignored and nobody is talking about the MRM because the matriarchy censors and nobody discusses ideas that they don't even know exist.
@@RandomDarter I totally disagree. As a man I understand the frustration and relationship dysfunction that drives men to want to go their own way, but MGTOW separates men from women entirely. But men need to take back society from those women, then work with those women to build families and societies. I'm not here to argue pro vs con of MGTOW; that's pointless. But I'm saying that men need to take back society, not divorce themselves from it.
I don't know about that. Women tend to be a civilizing influence on men since women demand much more of their living conditions and lifestyles than men. Men are much more willing to live with less and to endure everyday hardship than women. I'd think that in a matriarchy, we'd have many more creature comforts than we do now, because that is what women tend to want that men do not.
I feel lucky to catch such an insightful creator at this early stage of having only a few tens of thousands of subs. Well-written and thought-provoking piece.
Месяц назад+1287
poverty always restores the natural state of things
The women who I grew up around in the 60s and 70s were smarter funnier more resourceful and industrious and had self awareness . Humility is a sign of intelligence .
I would challenge the idea that humility is a sign of intelligence. There are a lot of intelligent people that are arrogant because of their intelligence. I would say humility is more a sign of the ability to self reflect, and an ability to set aside one's self
COVID was an excellent sign on that. There were a ton of "intelligent" experts and credentialed professionals who overnight adopted mantras, rituals and reveled in being petty tyrants.
I have already watched a quite a few videos on this channel. All of them had well argued and substantiated points. Had not subscribed before, as I never subscribe based on having watched just a a handful of videos, despite liking them. Now I have watched enough. You have earned my subscription.
You know, I wonder about this sometimes. Its the same logic the US military uses. But what I wonder... do we even need this kind of protection in the first place? Is life really so harsh that we need to be protected with violence? I don't know about you, but I've been able to protect people through indirect means far more effectivly than violence. I could be strong with muscles and threaten those who might harm my family... but all it takes is one other person with a gun to end all that protection. If you really want to protect those you love... violence isn't the best way to do it. You have to extend your influence and reach so far, that nobody has any reason to harm you. In fact, people around you are so loyal to you because of your aid and influence, that they will PROTECT YOU. This, shows how backwards we have it all....
@@JackPitmanNica Our "civilization" is not for ever, when economics crashes or some other important event occurs, words would not protect you from those who will try to take all from you. We live among animals...
@@raziel4949 Perhaps. Or perhaps, we are fundementally incapable of imagining peace. In Somalia, there was a period of anarchy. This period is one of the more peaceful periods in recent Somalian history. On another similar vein; back in the 1980s the US had plenty of ideas about what was going to happen when the USSR fell. Many people in the USA brass beleived that the USSR falling meant world war. Nobody believed that the USSR would fall peacefully. Let me ask you, what ended up happening? We are so wired to violence - that we are unable to see the peace within ourselves - that we are unable to see a peaceful option...
Women should have realized that in a good economic partnership with men most of them can benefit from his success more than they could achieve on their own. This is not men oppressing women. Rather it's men and women in a successful partnership oppressing their competitors of either sex. It only looks like oppression if women are determined to go it alone without partnering with men. (This only works for highly skilled, dedicated, focused women like old-time female physicians who were usually childless and often unmarried.) If they want to have children without men, this only works if the state takes over the role of husband/provider, which women in western countries have ensured that it does! In addition, since the jobs women do are not as valuable (wealth-producing) as the ones men do (as Ms Byrd points out), when women try to work for money, the wages they earn just contribute to price inflation: more money chasing the same amount of valuable goods. (That's why it takes two incomes to live nowadays. The woman's wages simply push up prices.) No one will voluntarily pay for an HR department. It and the employees there (almost all female) exist only to comply with various government regulations that act as a make-work program. Same with social work Health care employs as many people as it does because it is substantially free or subsidized, so people buy more of it than they would if they had to pay for it. Teaching is valuable only if it produces better outcomes than home-schooling could. Our parents believed it did. Who does anymore? And female-dominated teachers unions ruined it! So unless women are working in the true private sector, producing wealth in return for a wage the employer pays willingly to purchase value, women's work is mostly inflationary and therefore valueless. The idea that women should be able to go it alone and out-compete men is fundamentally a lesbian philosophy. Because lesbians *can't* countenance forming an economic partnership with men, they are driven into seeing themselves as oppressed. Same is true of heterosexual women who can't attract a man: they are doomed to bitter loneliness, the kind of soil in which Marxist philosophy germinates and thrives.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 I liked your comment. Everything you stated is correct, however, there is another dimension that is not discussed, and not allowed to be discussed (as I have found out). Western civilization is being destroyed. At a certain level in the political class the idea is that it is being destroyed to make something better. At a level of power above them, there is a somewhat more sinister motivation to restore Civilization to a state in which it serves to benefit solely those who own it (ordinary citizens being reduced to serfs). At the highest level, I think the motivation is revenge. There is evidence for my outlandish theory, however, you have to find it for yourself.
This is spot-on correct in my opinion. The world would be a better place if women stopped complaining about being oppressed, and started actively investing of themselves in their homes and families. Things wouldn't be better if women ran things. It's better when they are at home taking care of the family, the kids, and the home. It's on their shoulders to make good, solid families with their husbands and quit wanting to run off and work for a paycheck. It's really that simple. Quit thinking you're oppressed. You're not. You were fulfilling a unique role in the home. Only women can do that, so quit complaining and get back to it.
I work at a place where about 90% of the workers are female. It is Hell. All they do is complain for 8-12 hours nonstop. Trash talk the boss, ignore men like they are not there and keep backstabbing everyone while they try to destroy everyones reputation by mocking, lying and spreading rumours. Meanwhile all the men are just having fun and are very respectful with eachother.
I base it on personal experience and not on findings or studies. I grew up in two different homes. As a child youngest of 4 my mother decided she no longer wanted to be with her husband ( my dad). Till age of 12 I grew up with my mother and 2 older sisters and a brother , My life was miserable and absolutely chaotic. Then I moved in with my father till I went off to join the military. He turned me into a responsible, respectful, self sustainable, physically active athlete, and disciplined man. Meanwhile my older brother has been in and out of jail throughout his life, and my 2 sisters' lives are a mess . I owe him my life. The sadist thing is that she destroyed our family just because she claimed that my dad was too difficult to live with because he was a Vietnam veteran and that he was too serous, she wanted her life to be more carefree and fun.
As an older woman I believe Hollywood & woman's magazines took over by design the cultural formation roles formerly done by the tribe. When the economic crash happens women will need to go back to our reality based roles. BUT if we do not grasp the power of media in the hands of people who hate humanity & uses us like cattle we will slide back. I pray thus does not happen.
Very eloquent and poignant. I appreciate you doing the reading/research and presenting the topic in a very matter-of-fact type of way, unbiased and unburdened by political leanings. 10/10 video. Subscribed. P.S. : This is only the tip of the iceberg. There are so many underlying patterns that keep repeating themselves that are slowly eroding at progress and society as a whole. Never stop questioning the status-quo, but make an effort to understand just why it exists in the first place. That is the key to improvement.
You really need to stop living in fantasy land...you're fictional little quotes don't mean a damn thing, and you nonces keep spewing them thinking you're clever for it.
To humans: love, learn and laugh. The secret to life is charity and humor. My 100 year old grandfather told me this. He was a model citizen, devote father, local business owner and to this day ive never seen a love as strong and pure towards my grandmother. Defined roles that were so complimentary. Rest in peace grandma and grandpa. Thank you for teaching our family. Love and miss you deeply
Stuff like this really goes to show that women don't love men for shit. And that the truth is, they use men to opportunistically get benefits. No wonder why women are not raised how to treat a man.
@radeksparowski174 Al Bundy was only partly correct because in fact some genuinely high quality women do exist. But those women are only available to men at or near the top of "the food chain." Other men get stuck with the "leftovers," women who despite any physical beauty or mental acuity they may possess are only interested in men for how much they can manipulate and exploit them. Moreover a woman can be a "damsel in destress" without ceasing to be romantically attractive (a male human frailty). But once a women perceives any man as "weak" or "unstable" her perception to that affect immediately and forever destroys any romantic attraction she may have had for him.
I read something similar to that in one of the Archie comics, where Mr Lodge tells Archie that it isn't worth the effort to try and understand women, not even his daughter.
@@MiyamotoMusashi-lk1ec not related to that serial killer, just namesake, btw he earned his living by selling shoes....mostly to heavily overweight fugly women, but he really loved his family.....
forgot to mention that historically female monarchs are more likely to wage wars than their male counterparts. The reason for that is that during most of human history kings and emperors were expected to lead their armies directly in the battlefield putting their own lives at risk, something queens didn't had to do because women were not allowed on the battlefield.
Bra-freaking-vo. Very well researched and thought out. Everyone needs to see this, I really hope it goes viral. You'll hit 100k subs in no time with more content like this. THANK YOU!
This randomly reminded me of a time when I saw a woman on the internet angrily complaining about the word "housewife". I don't remember exactly what she said but I remember that her logic expressed as an argument was something like... 1. Housewife insinuates that the woman is married to her house[her house's wife]. 2. It is absurd and offensive to say that a woman is married to a house. 3. Therefore, the term "housewife" should not be used. In my mind, the logic continued to it's conclusion. 4. Wives are women who are married to men. 5. If housewife wrongly implies that women are married to houses, then manwife would be more accurate by implying that a wife is married to a man. So I asked her "Would you prefer to be called a manwife?". For some reason, I think she might have been offended
Practically speaking patriarchy that i see around me, women are in charge. maybe not as part of nobility, but on household, the madam of the house decide pretty much all social aspect of household.
Then the cycle will repeat and become truly patriarchal again. Until we realize that both feminism and machismo are sides of the same coin we won't reach anywhere. The mistake that normies commit is thinking that feminism is a noble movement, while originally it was, it has heavily deviated and turned into a misandrist cesspit weaponized to hand life on a silver plate to women who don't put the effort at the expense of the 99% of males in the planet who can't even have their first kiss and are blamed in spite of unrealistic standards of females. It's not about women are all bad or men are all bad, humans in spite of their gender are garbage, a gender activism won't just fix that core problem. We need to understand this in order to advance......
@@DutchCobbler no, we are living in a matriarchy. Most people are just blind to what they don't want to see. They are playing ignorant because they don't want to admit what's right in front of their eyes.
@@godleveleldritchblast5257 You misunderstand my remark. I was not denying that we are in a matriarchy, I refute the idea that people have become aware of it.
@@francisdashwood1760 No, that is a cope that women tell themselves. That is just another excuse women have concocted to convince themselves they aren't responsible. We have guns. We have mass telecommunication technology. If women can convince even 5% of men to obey them blindly, those men can kill anyone that resists with technology. There is nothing regular men can do. This is women's fault. And as I said in my first comment, it will not stop until society burns because people like you refuse to take responsibility for the power you have and the misuse of it. Please keep denying it though. I am going to enjoy watching women suffer the consequences of their actions.
Frigid women after they become moms? Or the women who only want hookups? Procreation and family planning is all women’s responsibility @@francisdashwood1760
Coherent video again. It sounds like you're exceedingly well read, and read for understanding. An author I discovered late in life dove-tailed well with my appreciation for Dr. Jordan Peterson, and that's the late Dr. Thomas Sowell. He was one of the USA's most brilliant economists but marginalized because he was a black conservative. He examined tons of history using the tools of economics. In a way, he was like G K Chesterton in the sense that you start with some little article, then you're buying a book a month because the writing is so lucid!
My mom has had almost infinitely more problems with female coworkers than with male. Men resolve conflicts with the implied threat of violence. Since that in a workplace setting, let alone against a woman is absolutely INTOLLERABLE, they mostly chill, or they get fired. Women? They resolve conflicts with reputation destruction, and that kind of thing is absolutely allowed, if not encouraged. She constantly had women sticking their nose into her business and trying to get her punished or fired over things that were none of their business. EG: She once had to seriously deal with a complaint that she was "creating a hostile work environment" because she gave candy to her friend, but wouldn't share with the pricks who were always making trouble for her.
That's an interesting point. There was a place I worked in many years ago: one of my colleagues, who was a toxic feminist, actually admitted once that she once worked in an all female environment and she said she would never do that again, just because of how toxic, nasty, dysfunctional and destructive it was. It still didn't cure her of her toxic feminism, 'though, for some reason. No fool like an old fool I guess.
My former job at Aldi to a T. All my bosses were women nearly a decade younger than me, all of them were catty to eachother, infighting, fucking eachother over, playing favorites. It was hell. They’d rather play favorites and try to climb over eachother and pull up the ladder than actually be good managers
I’m a plumbing contractor for 34 yrs. When all women need anything repaired, replaced or maintained they call men to get the work done. Women and men both totally depend on men for their precious AC in summer, heat in winter and everything in a modern house and outside in society. Inside men built and maintain every modern connivence and machines such as the furnace, the plumbing, the electrical and machines that provide us with everything in modern life. Outside men also maintain everything including roads, electric, plumbing and homes. Without men society would fall apart and not be repaired or maintained. Without men women would not have a toilet, a shower, a furnace for heat or a condenser for AC. Without men modern society would cease to exist.
Having just bought an apartment this year, I really appreciate all the handymen that did the building and outfitting. I also looked for local craftsmen with experience, not some cheap, imported labour that commercial landlords often go for. Learned a lot from them, as I'm less "hands on" as an IT engineer. Literally no woman did any of the actual work involved, especially not one of those feminists who constantly complain that they don't earn the same as men with their idiotic art school degree.
Plenty of men don't work these trades. There are women that do. The women who work trades are FAR better than the men that don't at the job. You really have to make it a man vs woman thing when you have to understand, many years ago women weren't even allowed to do this kind of work and are hundreds of years behind. Now in this day and age, you have less men and more women pursuing this line of work due to the expansion of industries, where more people can enter different fields of work. Think about those who work at hospitals as well, as nurses, as doctors and the gender balance is more equal, also in the hospitality industry too. When men who don't do trades brag about men building everything, those men have NO RIGHT to claim the achievements of other people simply because they share the same sex. That's the same argument as 'white men invented everything' said by a white man who never invented a thing in their life.
@@svr5423 You wouldn't even hire men who are from a foreign background. What makes anybody think you would have hired a woman who works trades? You already have your biases in place, don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't.
@@codesm96 "don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't" If we want to get into the useless ramifications of dialectics here, that's a trial of intent fallacy, as he never explicited the OP's post "proved" his point. So don't expect yourself to be right either, as you start with an assumption (that could very well be true, but that's beside the point). Nor did you know for what reasons he wouldn't choose foreign labor, so that can't be used as a solid argument either for anything (such as that weak correlation : "You already have your biases in place", when you don't actually even know which they are). Then, you conveniently omit his last sentence, which indeed, tends to confirm the OP's point. So where you at? Rationality without actual logical biases , seems a luxury.
Here's a book recommendation."The Corner That Held Them", a fiction book written by Silvia Townsend Warner in the 1940s. It's about a medieval nunnery where the nuns do awful things to one another, and it's considered a feminist book.
I've learnt a lot from your video. Although I may not agree with every bit of it, I sincerely admire your great courage to speak out in the current social milieu where any one who even suggests that he/she is thinking something different from the current prevailing dogma gets labelled and attacked. And I think your final solution is the best of all, for both men and women, that we should make it a priority to teach values to our kids in order to build a better tomorrow. Thanks.
People see what they want to see, unless they practice objectivity. The happiest women I've ever met were nuns..I met one happily married woman but she wasn't a housewife and her husband was rich. They had one child. There's no general definition of happiness.
I'm from Spain. In my country, when a woman marries, she keeps her surname. When she has children, they are given two surnames. The first is the father's, the second is the mother's. A person in Spain keeps their two surnames for life, hence why a married woman does not take her husband's name. There has been a trend though, of some married women adding their husbands surnames to the end of their two existing surnames. It is usually added with the use of the word "de" preceeding it. These women end up with three surnames. An example of this could be something like Maria del Mar Fernandez Alonso de Gutierrez. Too long..
@@NightinGal89 yes there is a definition of happiness , but you're probably meaning to say theres not anything in particular thatll make general human more happy, which is also nonsense. *morality of leftism vs rightism : fundemental motivation: one cannot even be sane without morality for your own sake regardless of morality . often, genes that spread are genes that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading, genes limit potential prettiness, pateince, intelligence(empathy correlates with better), lactose intolerance etc. . most people are habitually a mindless product of their environment, the ones that arnt remind theirself of what they must prioritize regularly, like every night. ...... increasingly popular mental illness is part of the worldwide shift to more loyalty to supporting immoral corporate-government machine in the worship of games like chasing low quality social status and overdosing into desensitization in lazy lifestyle. ................habitually remind yourself that people should instead win challenges especially in terms of long term collaborative trusting relationships. then prioritize existential exploration to ward off anxiety of what you couldve done, without spending all the time on it so you can ward off anxiety of missing out on other things , especially if you havnt been making much progress in exploration. then prioritize aesthetics. winning challenges is games, not being bored overdose desensitized consumer whos become too lazy to appreciate things, improve things, etc, because hes habitually isnt required much effort per reward. .....................the people practicing and promoting the mental illness also wage war against abrahamic religions. think of your relationship with the creator of everything as a game you having to figure out what to do, so you do what seems rational based on what you were apparently made to do, which is to be happy,. this is close to what tour genetically made to do, which is spreading your genes, because genes that spread are the ones that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading. judge yourself as if you are someone else. are your feelings functional? do you max information sharing for max likelihood of even unexpected productivity? you are not the creator of everything, you cant know so much, influence things minimaly unless you are very confident your influencing goodly vocational science of freedom how your assets are stolen from birth on youtube,odysee,rumble etc. yandex instead of google,types of linux instead of windows/mac. ................... so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life :see book called divine speech by nouman ali khan and sharif randhawa says " The Qur' an itself refers to its unmatched beauty and power as a proof of its divine origin, challenging its detractors to produce something comparable to it, or even to a single portion of it, if they claimed it was of human design (I0:38; 11: 13; 17:88). " "The smallest chapter (Surah) in the Quran is Surah Al-Kawthar. It is the 108th chapter and consists of only three verses. " - chatgpt .,so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life
@@NightinGal89 I mean if you take a sampling of tiktok right now you will see woman after woman after woman who drank the feminist kool aid ranting about how much their life sucks and blaming everyone except themselves. The mental gymnastics some of them go through to blame everything on men is quite frankly gold medal worthy. And the rest of the time they're huffing high grade copium. Don't see too many married women being miserable online unless they're feminists.
@@rodterrell304 she will get the baked in dem votes in the usual places, but probably not in the swing states where she needs them, hence she will need someone like Josh Shapiro or Andy Bashear as a VP, but that decision will be made by the DNC machine and the donors, who are the ones who ultimately made the decision to jettison uncle joe.
@@rodterrell304what does Kamala Harris have anything to do with this? She was a district attorney and an attorney general before becoming a senator. How is this any different than many of the men who served in those three roles?
I have worked in two female dominated professions, and neither are any fairer or "better" than working in male dominated professions. There's a lot more back-stabbing and subterfuge, though. I appreciate the honesty of other men. I appreciate the willingness to accept mistakes and do better the next time of women.
whats with female professions, they seem to be constantly stressed and burnt out despite work itself aint that hard... is it that highschool constant "game" socially to keep up to avoid that bad side? Granted for male dominated ones any tiny sign of weakness causes same thus mistakes should not often be admitted.
I've worked with my hands my entire life. I have never been in a male dominated field (which is the only kind of work I have ever done) where mistakes have not been accepted or forgiven as long as the one who made the mistake isn't a complete mess-up and the mistake was honest and learned from. If a man *genuinely* apologizes and actually *wants* to do better and doesn't just brush it off as 'no big thing' then he'll be accepted and even taught better. Every time. Never had it any other way anywhere and I've worked in some nasty fields. It's about Merit with men. Earn your way, learn your way, do well, don't be a burden. If something comes up for a dude that tears him apart (divorce papers, girlfriend cheating, departed friend or family member), guess what! We're there for each other. It's times like *that* when we cover for each other and carry that 'dead weight', and be there for one of our brothers. Nobody else cares about us, society hates us, so we care for each other in ways women will never, ever be able to understand. You don't know. You can't know. You'll never know. The one, single time I took an office job in a female dominated field it was an utter nightmare of backstabbing, underhanded social maneuvers, fake smiles, fake friendships, dissing each other behind each others backs (and never, ever saying anything about it!), following along behind the most toxic leadership imaginable without one peep about the wrongness of what is going on, and more. It was the worst two weeks of my life. I'm convinced women aren't capable of love at this point. You don't even have friends; you have 'girls I don't hate today, but secretly envy or want to tear down'. Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over.
@@SoulSoundMuisc Yup, there's a reason that imperial harems were known to be brutal bloodthirsty places. Mix the worst traits of women with actual power plays, assassinations and poisoning...
@@SoulSoundMuisc PREACH!!! "Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over." Have literally witnessed this and thought the exact same thing.
I've visited those matriarchal households where the man instructs guests to leave the toilet seat down as a courtesy. Lift the seat and every time you'll see dried old pee splatter accumulated on the underside. Gross! Be sure to look the woman of the household in the eye when you tell her you always leave the seat up if only to wipe the gross pee splatter and leave it obviously clean for the next person.
The first target of feminism in didnsntling the family was to take away a woman's option to enter into and/or remain in a polygamous marriage. My own ancestor was a second wife who was happy until new laws forced her to live like a mistress visited by a man her children called "Uncle" instead of his true title of Father. Eliza R. Snow wrote (in an essay i found through the footnotes of "Saints Volume 2") of how the people opposed to Latter-day Saint polygamy were themselves obsessed with sex, and incapable of viewing plural marriage as anything but an opportunity for more sex. She said that those men were mad when they visited Utah because there was no "bawdy house" nor women who would engage in casual sexual relations. Eliza R Snow said that men on the East Coast didn't want their mistresses getting any ideas about being honest women together. And while her accusations regarding the moral character of head anti-polygamists of the time may have been wrong. What she said about the consequences of banning plural marriage is absolutely correct; Now we have hypergamy with aversion to both marriage and childrearing. Now that I've said my piece on the matter, please do mistake me. I am a Latter-day Saint, and i stand for our policy of monogamy. But the government ban on polygamy was designed by mortals to destroy our church; and the plan to do so was given them by infrrnal forces seeking to destroy the family. Additionally, the legal precedents set by Reynolds vs The United States and related cases are instrumental in the ongoing destruction of the family unit and free speech.
Thank you. Well researched and well said. Another good example often cited is that "survivor competition" they did once with men on one island and women on another. The women had troubles building shelter, trapping food, and avoiding danger. If memory serves, they needed to be rescued before the end of their scheduled time. By the end of the test, the men had created basic shelter and were hunting. And they had figured out how to get freshwater and how to safely dispose of their solid waste so that they wouldn't spread disease to each other.
@@erinbyrd5377 Another good example is the late Queen Elizabeth. While she made many charities and public service organisations, the negative effects Matriachy influence is especially insidious in England, even if it's invariably unintentional on her part. Ever since she rose to power, the Court system and Justice system in England slowly started to erode mens right's in court of law. Today, if a man got falsely accused of doing something to a women, generally speaking the Judge will always side with women even if he is innocent. Johnny Depp is a prime example of this where he lost the case in England despite the overwhelming evidence supporting his story. If they are falsely accused, men do not stand a chance. And a lot of women are starting to catch on to that fact and take advantage of that system. For example, I know a British youtuber who has a big channel and very popular got falsely accused by two women and lawyered up but his attorney likely told him there's no point litigating this and just give in to the demands which the two women wanted large sums of money knowing he was rich. He had no choice but to acquiesce to the extortion. Matriarchies do not work.
I remember that. The women told everyone they won’t need any help from the men. A week later they still couldn’t build a fire and were freezing cold. The girls told everyone they would beat the men in the competition, but when it got hard, they all went over the the men’s side of the island and flirted with the men to try and stand next to their fire and get warm.
Stumbled upon this video, and I'm glad I did. I'd never heard of Standpoint Theory, but it tied together so many things I've noticed in society but lacked the knowledge to name. I found this entire video very enlightening. And I hope you won't mind my saying I think you're an absolutely lovely lady, and you have a very soothing voice. I listened to this on the way to work this morning and forgot all about how bad Dallas traffic can be.
American Survivor did a episode where it was one team of all men vs one team of all women, but they lived at the same beach. The women mooched off of the men to survive.
So you're saying... men are more powerful? And... might makes right? Or something. There is so much idiocy in this comment section I don't even know anymore.
Seriously. Like this is a funny joke and yet its not. Compare Toby Macguire's Spider-Man to the She-Hulk. Down-trodden and self-sacrificing versus successful and twerking. One a hero,....the other just a self-interested individual. Women,....and super-HEROES have nothing to do with each other. Marvel destroyed itself by not understanding that.
@@truthseekerodinson5094 His Spiderman lost his family, friends, job, even his powers and nearly dies (more than once) and yet, he still chose to be a hero and put others first. This is a role model. Meanwhile She hulk was all "Yeah but, I like, got wolf whistled at", and "My life is SOOOOOooooooooooo much harder than yours because of the patriarchy", while twerking in her really expensive lawyers office. She'd rather be rich and famous than do what it take to be a true hero. This is sad.
Flawless explanation on the subject. It deserves many many more views 🙏🏼 Now let's go into every educational institution in Western society and get ALL students to watch this 25 minute video so that they actually can reflect on the trajectory of our society and understand that the social 'experiment' we've been carrying out the last 3-6 decades is failing.
Thank you for restoring my faith in the ability of members of the generations of Americans younger than my, Boomer, generation to think sensibly and rationally about social issues.
My mother was born in '30 and started college at 16. My grandmother expected her to get married, but my grandfather said 'you want to go to college? See the world? go do it'. And she did. As an historian I have read a great deal of regular people stories. In the 19th century your everyday farm family had the father and son handling grain crops and maybe herd animals, maybe take the herd or grain to town. Women tended to take care of the garden, milk cow, orchard, cooking and cleaning. The work was done. No one was oppressed. Everyone did something. Who was oppressed there?
90% of the population, working people, systematically exploited by the owner class. 78 hour weeks, no breaks, no overtime, no job security, no benefits, no retirement.
@@ronwatford7331 or fiance or boyfriend/girlfriend... i get what you're saying, though i'd be less concerned about that over starsigns lol Next time someone asks me my sign, i'll just make something up, and watch their mental gymnastics.
@@ronwatford7331women want partners because bringing home a paycheck is nothing compared to all the 24 hr responsibilities wives have. And those things can’t be put off till later like mowing the lawn.
50/50 is a lie. I hate to seem like an ahole, but I'm tired of having this conversation. Every man must emancipate himself, because men are more incredulous than women. I have neither the time nor the patience
Ikr, I'm VERY attracted to intelligence, it is the most attractive trait a person can have, ofc that doesn't mean you have to be smart for me to like you, but still it's awesome Edit I should clarify what type of intelligence I'm talking about, I'm talking about the kind and considerate intelligence, not the "I'm right and you're retarded for not thinking the same way I am" type of intelligence, those people are a huge turn off
An excellently constructed piece! Would it be fair to say a patriarchy uses truth and logic, whilst a matriarchy prioritizes emotions and feelings; the former allows for the creation and expansion of human society, where the latter, seems, to be destructive and anathema to said society!?
I’m glad as of late I’m seeing women speaking and pushing back against the chaotic society we live in today. I pray for this channel, to accomplish their goals in stimulating minds across the U.S.A for deeper understanding.
Yes, but those women are only speaking out and "pushing back" as you call it because it benefits them. They're unable to make a go of life without the assistance of men... so they're trying to come back into the fold.
*Useful CHAMELEONS.* Women are SURVIVORS. It's their natural tendency to align with the winning side (in this case Men) to up their odds of Survival. Women are realising that Men are waking up n are refusing to Marry them. So they are changing colours ... In the coming times, you will see more n more Wom3n doing that. Notice how she said that 'I have compassion for the Women who do S3x work online' and that 'we live in an Unforgiving Society'. Both are the talking points of a Woman who has skeletons in the Closet.
So many women say "men need to teach men how to treat women." But they don't let their children have a male role model
Or "teach Men it's wrong to rape"...............clearly someone doesn't understand an actual rapist cares more about their intentions than whether the act in question is right or is wrong. I get the feeling some of the Women who use that cliche are a little too empathetic to monsters.
Facts
@@elijahwilson1422 that phrase is so stupid, even psychopaths know what they do are wrong, the thing is that they don't care.
lets not ask what the real purpose of rape is on nature, something says that the survival of the species is more important than the desire of individuals or the super high pickyness of woman.
the irony of monogamy being what defends against the savagery of our instincts.
Men don't need to teach men how to treat woman, we used to do that before feminism freaked the nuclear family model. Who do you think created the family and put woman in the altair, literally ? it was man. Protection of the family was something we used to taught our sons, but that's bad because its masculinity and feminism wants weak families because they want freedom from responsibility to society.
Woman were the ones that don't know how to treat anyone like adults.
A lot of men in the West are missing that male role model. They simply stand less of a chance in this world.
because they say that, but sexualy desire men who don't
My heaviest moment of disillusionment as a young angry feminist was watching the episodes of Men Vs Women Survivor/Island type shows which can be found on RUclips. It was eye opening to see a what was essentially a sociological experiment in real time, stripped of all culture and innovation, watching male and female nature express itself in a natural setting when isolated from one another. These things stood out to me the most:
1. Men's greatest strength was the ability to form a rapid social consensus and make a reasoned plan in short time, getting straight to building and tasks without much leadership as if abstract problem solving was purely instinctual. Regardless of cultural, rural or metropolitan background, every male possessed the spacial intelligence to manipulate the environment to their survival needs. The men would then catch and slaughter the small wild pigs on the island in order to cook and eat them, showing no guilt or conscience in order to survive.
2. Women's greatest strength was the adopting, nurturing and caring of the little wild pigs, as if they were their own children. Their compassion for the animals was second to none, and every woman intuitively understood this without being taught or instructed. Not a single woman would push down that maternal instinct in order to kill and a cook a pig, and any foraged food they did gather they would feed the little pigs rather than feed themselves, as if on pure instinct. That maternal instinct was so powerful and enveloping that It did not logically occur to the women that the pigs were already capable of foraging their own food before they all arrived on the island. The women struggled to form any solid consensus or plan across multiple days, ending up incredibly frustrated and resentful at one another, but were unable to quite peice together why the leadership vacuum was never filled. Eventually shelter and fire was built by individual Katniss-Everdeen-type rural women who had already picked up those skills elsewhere in the real world and chose to detach themselves from the group.
After watching this play out, so much of our civilization and its working components made clearer sense to me. Everything from traditions, to art, social stigmas, language, ideaology, veganism, environmentalism, technology.. It was an 'aha' moment that has personally brought me a lot of peace. This information did not turn me into a rigid gender-roles traditionalist, it simply allowed me to see that Patriarchy is just a euphamism for Civilisation, and Matriarchy is a synonym for family. No matter how many edgy PHD's we want to write on the contrary, the creative male mind drives virtually every avenue of human endeavour on earth apart from social relations and the raising of the young, and no amount of protesting, social reform or pulling government levers will ever change this underlying nature.
I really like your phrasing of the “catniss Everdeen type of women” can you elaborate on the characteristics of those women and your thoughts towards them? For an example, are they more masculine and logical than most, being able to at least detach themselves from their maternal instincts, are they a rarity?
@@vianguyen1588
Firstly I think that every person has a breaking point for self-preservation. Even with a powerful love for all living things, any rational woman would reach a point of hunger so desperate they would take a knife to an animals throat. It's just a matter of which woman chooses to do it first.
Secondly I think Men and Women both have a social strength that the other lacks that we almost never talk about. For men it is the ability to 'defer' to the other male's plans, balancing and sharing abstract concepts quickly and the ability to seperate the personal from the conceptual. Those men who's ideas were not chosen don't really mind as long as they are working toward the task as a secondary servant in a top-down leadership pyramid. Emerging from this comes philosophy and the social juggling of logic and reason to shift one another's perceptions and ideas. They build cognitively the same way they build physically - by building upon the previous schematic and improving it further. Emerging from this comes women's lingo of men over-explaining in relationships, as men tend to grow accustomed to information dumping all the inner neurosis of their latest theory on their male friends in hopes of a stumilating returned counter-theory.
Women's social strength by contrast is what I call 'threat mapping'. We usually express it as 'gossip' in the culture - but gossip in a tribal context has survival relevance, as the social finer details of the rest of the tribe and its social affairs can highlight and help distinguish dangers and threats from inside and outside the tribe. Emerging from this came the male lingo about women being 'birds', twittering together as a collective hive when in large groups. It makes logical sense that women bearing and nurturing vulnerable children close to their breast for all of living history leave them predisposed to perceive and anticipate surrounding danger and are constantly gathering and passing along packets of information to build a social 'map' in order to stay ahead of danger. This includes anticipation of social tension and the possibility of inner-tribe violence, but also includes provisional threats such as running out of food and medicine, or detecting an impending illness. This is also why women are noticeably predisposed to take smaller medical maladies more seriously in ways that men might pass over or ignore, lest they grow larger and endanger the tribe.
I know I can't prove these theories on paper, but I think that there is a tiny subset of both sexes on the ends of the bell curve who's psychology does do not align with the coresponding communication style, and these are typically show up as either exceptionally compassionate nurturing men, or reasoned and calcalutive individualist women who find gossip disorienting.
What a very insightful comment. Thanks for sharing it.
and... modern women still reject the facts & reality. so funny!
@@vianguyen1588 yes they (like katniss) are rare. or majority of modern women, they just try to imitate katniss, but in the end, they are just not even 10% katniss abilities 😁😆
My story:
I was born as very gifted boy. Mind-bogglingly gifted.
My mother was touched by feminism. She believed in equality.
Same with my teachers, almost all of them were women.
I had four sisters. Because I was very successful in school even without learning almost all chores around the home were mine.
Support went to my sisters just to help them to "catch me".
Similarly in school.
I attention and support went to students "in need" especially to girls.
How it looked like from my perspective?
I was neglected and overall treated worse as a human being.
I felt punished like I was doing something wrong.
Especially when I was succeeding in something.
It went through all my life until 20th year of my life when I totally collapsed.
I went straight from studying very difficult into the most simple job in construction.
What happened then?
All those feministic "softhearted" women came with triumph just to celebrate victory.
Finally they won. What a fantastic victory it was.
Withholding love, affection and support because someone is a man, especially gifted?
Only women, stupid, poor and weak need love?
What kind of perverted conditional love it is?
I was raised from rock-bottom by three older guys.
I've got from them food, shelter and finally some love and acceptance. Maybe for the first time in my life I was treated as normal human being.
No single women helped me.
For me its matriarchy in nutshell.
Now I'm well off reasonably but I will never allow woman to have any power over me.
@@NewfolderD I am sorry those things happened to you. I think a lot of feminist women believe that men don't have feelings or if they do, they don't matter. They assume that it's easy for all men to be successful. Your family was misled by a toxic belief system. Mine was too, which resulted in me believing that I was a feminist for some time. It took wisdom and pain for me to see the truth, and to understand that men are so very important. The people who have hurt me the most in life, hands down, have all been women. I tried relentlessly to live out my philosophy by cooperating with them and building them up as people, only to be betrayed by friends who hated me because they thought their boyfriends liked me. It broke my heart.
Women today are all emotionally abusive en masse.
Frankly, women are innately emotionally abusive because of the way the creat hierarchies based off reputation destruction rather than competence.
Women aren't suited for hierarchies or leadership.
And yeah, the emotional abuse of men by women, is pretty bleak.
@@erinbyrd5377I think its more accurate to say that women are innately dredisposed to emotionally abusing men, and feminism enables rather than suppresses this instinct.
It's really not being "misled" let's be honest. It's a dark jungian shadow part of female nature.
All I'm seeing from this comment is that many women are just really really stupid, or that women intrinsically do not care for men in any real regard. I'd day it's probably a mixture of both.
Womens neurotic self obsession (solipsism) makes it markedly easy for them to dehumanize men.
i hope you overcome these traumas and find your peace and balance as a man, and come out of it stronger. dont let these women, nor your experiences, define you. despise them, feel anger, pity, but dont hate them. remember Our Lady and what a woman can be.
Brave woman. My hat is off to you for not drinking the kool-aid and for being unafraid to speak the truth, even at personal cost.
💯
Matriarchies put women into positions of power but not so much into positions of responsibility.
🙌 🏅
Men's *FORMAL* positions of power - which in reality were precarious positions of servitude given power in order to carry out that service - were erroneously seen as positions of power only and the responsibility part was ignored. It was a prize, a trophy, for greedy, ignorant, narcissistic drones.
That is not Matriarchy - that is Gynocentrism!
An exception to this is the Philippines. It is very matriarchal (at the familial level), but first-born daughters bear most of the responsibility.
Name a female president
Power without responsibility is an unmitigated disaster.
"Handouts without responsibility destroy human dignity" ~Former senator Bob Dole
Most men through it history did that
@@ragsrare3771 Only in more "recent" times. Traditional government, the Thingdom, does not allow for that. Republics, Democracies, Empires, etc. are what allows for that to happen on a large scale.
@@wegfarir1963 Whole history is full with male rulers who are never held responsible. Not only recent.
Knowledge, Responsibility, Control are intertwined.
You cannot control or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to know.
You cannot know or properly control that which you are unwilling to be responsible for.
You cannot know or be responsible for that which you are unwilling to control.
Think back to when you were learning to ride a bike, drive a car, etc. - it started out shaky, uncertain, due to a lack of knowledge or skill (control). As you learned more about what you were doing and how to do it, you knew more, you were willing to be more responsible, you were able to increase your control - until you reached a point sufficient in all 3 areas that you could reliably ride the bike, drive the car, etc.
Now imagine refusing any responsibility for driving the car. One way of refusal is deciding that pedestrians were targets instead of beings to be respected. You can imagine the result. How about refusing to know? Close your eyes while driving. You have no visual input with which to drive the car. What happens? How about refusing to control. Take your hands off the steering wheel while on the highway - what would happen?
Power is an enormous amount of Control. That level of control requires a high level of knowledge and responsibility to maintain GOOD control. What often happens is bad control leads to bad results, the person in control doesn't want to be responsible for bad results - and the lower the responsibility, the less control, the less they are willing to know, and you see the dwindling spiral. More bad decisions happen. Fear of consequences should they lose power comes into play, so they desperately hang on for survival.
And this is the best case scenario. Is it any wonder the sane people tend to avoid power, while the corrupt criminals [who have little if anything to do with responsibility] are drawn to it, if only to have power to avoid accountability for their own crimes?
Benjamin Franklin said a Republic was created in 1776. It is up to us, all of us, to keep it. We have for far too long allowed the criminals to "represent" us, and look what that has wrought.
Matriarchy fails because reality is actually not created by feelings.
university studies show that women don't have more emotions than men. women just express their emotions more
Feminism has been used to shift our societies and economies from single income families to two income families. This has enabled exponential real estate inflation and industrial production & consumption.
Finally. Someone gets it. Well said.
And now wamon is inflated out of the possibility to be full time homemaker.
THIS!!!!
You're not wrong
And now a lot of women wonder why most men can’t pay all of the bills.
When I was a kid loud Feminists argued stridently that if there was a female Prime Minister of Great Britain then all wars and fighting across the globe would stop. Then Margaret Thatcher was elected in England and that particular axiom disappeared from political discourse entirely.
Imagine being dumb enough not only to believe the PM's gender mattered but also to believe Britain had any relevance to influence world affairs after 1945.
And the feminists hated thatcher because she was traditional in most of her values
@@theverystones2643😂
@@theverystones2643 So true, a most valuable lesson for radical feminists.
They should be happy. See, women suck as rulers just as badly as men! Equality!
I’ve been bullied by other women and consequently, a matriarchy sounds like hell on earth to me.
Same here
MORE heirachal than EVER BEFOOORRREEEE. 😂
In the same way that patriarchy hurts men? In the exact same way? 🤔
@@SubtleStair No. The patriarchy "hurts men" exactly whenever the feminist narrative needs it to "hurt men", while at the same time, the patriarchy keeps all men above women and gives men all the power, status and privilege in society, which of course, benefits men, but as before mentioned, simultaneously does THE OPPOSITE of benefiting men, whenever it needs to in order to support some feminist ideological claim.
Think of it as wave function collapse in quantum mechanics, where the particle position remains a secret until the wave function collapses and reveals the nature of men's evil. Or like a coin toss where it's heads - women are victims, or tails - men are oppressors. Or a Three Card Monty game where there's a privileged sinful man hiding behind every card. There are many variations, but you get the idea.
@@etsequentia6765 patriarchy does hurt men because only top percent of men get benefits. A egalitarian one which all men get benefits is the one benefits men.
Because men and women are not the same. It's almost like we were designed for different roles. Shocker
IKR mine mind blown.
We are far more similar than we are different.
@@Knight766 sure. But both sides are focusing too much on the differences, and not enough on the similarities. I’m just trying to point to the fact that, yes we are different, but we should focus on the similarities, rather than differences. We need each other. We need to collaborate.
This sketch sums it up perfectly: ruclips.net/video/-rC-nDkae5k/видео.html
@@mrastronaut9078propaganda. we dont have anything in common with them
What feminists don't realize is that working within limitations is incredibly freeing. Limitations keep out negative things. Houses are limitations from the weather, traditional western marriage is a limitation on sexual experiences with the world, but within a marriage, it's a lot of fun.
@@danieldosso2455 Wow, you are absolutely correct
Schopenhauer said that all limitations make people happy.
You want women to stay in houses?
I don't think my marriage is fun.. more like work
@@bjung8858 It requires sacrifices, but that's what makes it so fulfilling.
After my dad passed, my family changed from a patriarchy to a matriarchy over night. Things very quikly went off the rails, and while my mom tried her best, she could not protect their legacy. I reflect on what went wrong often. As man, my dad knew he was expendable. Men are raised that way. The highest honour is to die protecting your family. Family comes first. My mom was more concerned about her own feelings and happyness and eventually tore our family apart with selfish decisions. She died of cancer, and squander my dads inheritance on her own indulgences. I miss my dad, and learned that men are not as expendable as I once believed.
What ever made you feel men were expendable?
@@fronttowardenemy9994 that would be the social construct outside the home.
@@lexzenis2544 so society tells you that your dad is disposable, to be discarded like a piece of rubbish once he no longer a utility? And females choose to believe what society says rather than what your own eyes show. You liked the idea that men are expendable because women think in a zero sum game, it made you feel more valued if men weren’t. Fathers are clearly wasting their time and lives on these people.
@@lexzenis2544 then society is clearly not worthy of men’s sacrifices. Point noted.
Men are expendable (to a point) in a well functioning society. Sure it sucks if its someone important to you, but the men that remain should be picking up that slack and helping the next generation grow and thrive. Society now though has been sinking deeper and deeper into the quicksand, at some point unless it does something intelligent it will collapse into anarchy.
“Kids don’t need a bigger house. They need values instilled in them.” Convicting words 24:02
need big houses, large spaces, Nature and culture.
Amen! A man and a woman in a marriage is Biblical. It is amazing how both men and women contribute to society in slightly different, yet equally important ways!
Its how victorious nations die, they can afford more, their men build more, but they don't want to be mean to their own kids so they skip the discipline.
@@lukek1949 Marriage existed before that book of nonsense
@@dexstewart2450 - The Book covers LiFe before the existence of man & so
if you become respectful & wise you may get to see
your ancestors, if not, they will get to hear of you.
Psalms 19: 7 - 10
Jude 14, 15; John 11: 21 - 27
Insert that one famous clip from the TV show Survivor, where the group of men are quickly able to gather food, build a fire and assemble structures to sleep in and protect from the weather. Were as the women just sit around and argue until some of them wander over to the male group.
damn i wanna watch that
@@Silverstreamable You don't. It's infuriating.
The game was rigged in favour of the women yet they still lost
The women couldn’t figure out how to obtain food and they “found” a piglet and instead of eating it, they adopted it and tried to name it. Meanwhile the men were hunting small alligators.
I saw this quote somewhere that perfectly encapsulated all of the divorces of people i have personally known.
"Men give up their happiness for their families,
Women give up their families for their happiness."
Matriarchies fail because future success requires sacrifice.
Facts, and they want someone else to sacrifice for matriarchy, mainly men and we're not falling for it.
Lol. Yeah. And other things… accountably… etc.
No matriarchies fail because, as was pointed out in the video, only men can be the enforcement arm.
And if you can just get what you want at any time by opening your legs for a man, why would you ever sacrifice?
@@hansgullickson4080
Literacy...
My parents divorced when I was 4. They had joint custody but my mom actually wanted me to be with my dad during the week and her on weekend. This is because she knew he would do a better job taking care of me and he most definitely was by far the more responsible parent. It wasn't 100 percent stable with my dad cause he was a young mechanic that didn't make a whole lot but definitely more stable than the chaotic life my mom was living. When I was with her she usually had a dysfunctional boyfriend and a lot of times would just leave me with my uncle so she could go out to the bars. Sometimes she would even bring me along. She's not a horrible person. She loves me and I never went hungry when I was with her but she was never responsible. She prioritized men over her kids but she would never admit that. My dad worked a lot and at times it felt like he should be around more often but he was really working hard so he could take care of me and eventually my little brother too. He was still always there and taught me responsibility, accountability, respect, and discipline. He's always been there to help me and even gave me a job that i fell in love with and will be my career. My mom never did anything for her future. Every job she had she ended up quitting. No 401k. No Ira. 55 and she has nothing cause of the decisions she made in the past. Now I'm the only one that will help her.
What I'm trying to say is fathers are seen as the not so necessary parent when in actuality they are absolutely necessary and are often times the better parent.
Statistically, not enough people will read your comment for its length, but that doesn’t make it any less poignant, accurate or exemplary.
As a career auto worker and a single father (with an ex who dodges accountability constantly), I would love to meet your dad, shake his hand, and share a beer with him. 🍻 ❤️
Being a good man is an uphill climb in western society. Good on you for recognizing his sacrifice and his efforts. 💪 🙌
@@TheTexican05 he's a dope mf. Can promise you it wouldn't just be one beer, though.🤣
I was lucky.
My parents divorced (amicably) when I was 10. Me and my older brother lived with our mother. Our mom worked herself to the bone while always making time for us as best she could.
She was always calm and collected, and when shit went down she always kept her head. When me and my brother did stupid shit all she needed to do was give us The Eye or speak with That Tone and we'd get our shit in order.
She was my role model growing up.
I learned how to deal with life, how to knuckle down and work hard even if it sucked, and to keep a cool head when the shit hits the fan, not from lectures or lessons, but from seeing her living example.
Her one glaring weakness, both when we were growing up and now, is handling money and budgeting. I learned from that too, but as a negative example of what not to do.
My dad on the other hand . . . He wasn't a bad dad, but he basically wasn't a dad at all. He was kind of a non-entity, a ghost, present but not really having any impact, during the majority of my life, even before they divorced. It's only now in my thirties and his sixties that he's trying to be a dad. Too little too bloody late, but at least he's trying, if clumsily and poorly.
Pretty sure that his difficulties being a dad stem from a combination of his experience with his own very strict, very old school dad and him almost certainly being autistic. (Source: I'm a late diagnosed autistic and knowing what to look for now it seems almost certain that dad's autistic too.)
@DefaultFlame being a poor parent is definitely not unique to either gender. I've known some kids growing up with some deadbeat ass dads but had strong mothers. From my experience, however, it does seem like the kids without fathers have the biggest issues with respect and discipline.
@@vcalv9354 Yeah, I think my dad just didn't know what to do and defaulted to letting mom raise us for the most part, even when they were together.
I resent him just a little bit for not really trying harder when I was growing up, but I understand why. He had an unreasonably harsh dad growing up, who only provided an example of what not to do. Combine that with undiagnosed autism and mom's excellent parenting and I can see why he just kind of coasted, settling into the role of breadwinner and nothing else.
Like I said before, he wasn't a bad dad, the issue is that he wasn't really much of a dad at all, he was just kind of there. Present, but not having much of an impact.
Ages ago I did a report in middle school about suffrage and the 19th, so I interviewed my grandmother, who was a young woman at the time. I remember thinking how insane she sounded as she recounted telling my grandfather to vote against pro-suffrage candidates. She didn't want it. I did not understand for a very very long time.
amazing. grace goodwin was an author at the time and she recounts the same thing. suffrage was a disaster.
I think it was also a very clear indicator of how women still very much had power with voting. When people got married, that vote the man made was typically for the betterment of the family, they usually consulted their wives on the situation, and the outcome was more or less what both of them thought was right. Could it be completely vetoed by the man? yes, but that wasn't a substantial enough part of our society to really make women have no voice at all.
Thank god for men who know how to be fathers and women who know how to be mothers otherwise we wouldn't be here.
"Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny." - Aristotle
This is not a "new" phenomenon.
@user-xs3sj3em6u
The quote is complete bullshit. It's not just that Aristotle never said that. There was no republics, and democracies were lead exclusively by men.
@@mmestari You're complete bullshit, numerous sources attribute that to Aristotle, altho it's possible that Plato said it as well.
@@uncbadguyAristotle was using old greek boomer language for
Strong men masculine republic creates easy time easy time allowed soft people in feminine democracies which led to tyranny and we back at hard times
Which give way to collapse, more tyranny or a new republic.
Parents should not only teach men how to treat women, but just as importantly, teach young girls how to treat men. What a concept!
Amen
I did that with my daughter and she is so much better off for it! All of her friends struggle maintaining a healthy romantic relationship with men; and she has thrived. 🌹
That's not the problem. They are intermediate to actual children and actual adults, and societies operated accordingly for all of human history. No amount of teaching can remediate the consequences of pretending otherwise.
@@epicmercury333do you have some advice or insights about it that you can share with us?😅
@@lordexdj First I tried to model proper male before towards her, always treating her like a lady unless she was doing something really harmful.
Second, when she did become verbally malicious and manipulative with her brother, I warned her that girls/women have an advantage with words (and therefore, emotional manipulation). But boys/men have the physical advantage and that she needs to careful. If she ruthlessly attacks her brother verbally/emotionally, he’s eventually going to be bigger than her and use his fists.
She didn’t seem worried about it at the time, but she did stop being so cruel. Of course, I taught my son to restrain his physical aggression and channel his aggression into sports or worse case scenario, destroy an object and not his sister.
Within a few years, her brother was bigger and much stronger than she was. But I taught them both restraint: her to be careful with her words/emotional manipulation and for him to be careful with his physicality, because he could really hurt her without even trying.
This is why in ancient times a common curse was 'May you be ruled by your women'.
word
Some of us guys still use some variation of that saying when speaking of or to beta boys.
Erin, they'll throw you out of college for this kind of blasphemy. Of course, that probably means that you are correct and that is something that has to be suppressed and destroyed.
Truth and facts are anathema to the narrative and must be eliminated. I consider you heroic for espousing facts and standing up to the power of "feminism".
Let the feminist build their matriarchy while we are chilling in the woods with the bears.
Cool. I’m going to Thailand a bang pros
They make great gym bros
ruclips.net/video/GBY2xsu2Juk/видео.htmlsi=Pi5Hb76QJRke-3Dn
@@hansgullickson4080lady boys
They’ll get other men to hunt you and put you to work.
Bearmaxxing 🐻 😎
With respect to what you said about bonobos, the irony is that male sexuality has been increasingly vilified and effectively criminalized while sexual liberation was celebrated for women. So, it’s actually gotten much worse for men which is reflected in that fact that there’s now a large disparity between the number of men who are sexually active and the number of women who are, because far fewer men are having sex because the pursuit of sex by men is considered socially unacceptable or worse, while it is celebrated for women. This is one of the most harmful aspects of the current push for a matriarchy.
Wow, you're totally right
It really annoys me when "pro-sex" feminists cite bonobos. In bonobo culture, the females use sex to curb male aggression. If humans actually acted like bonobos, then women would see male anger and frustration as a signal to submit to them sexually. In other words, some incel screaming in rage that he can't get laid would trigger a bunch of women to have sex with him. Does this sound anything at all like how women actually act? No! Of course not!
Completely not the case. Pursuit of sex by men is very socially acceptable. Not only is a guy who gets laid envied by peers, but considered a 'true man'. Women prefer men with sexual experience. Trying to laid is just 'boys being boys'. The 'vilification' is of consent and what exactly that means... Because of the power differential previously, it didn't matter if the woman objected and now that's in question
@@ne0x1ty How absolutely delusional. Only male sexuality is vilified in this country because of false claims like the ones that you just made that result in false paradigms like what you said about consent. It’s not living in reality. The reality is that men can be accused of harassment and worse for pursuing sex, for expressing the desire, for looking like they want to, and they have to be on guard for getting in serious trouble for even thinking it, which is why they have to be surreptitious about it. The whole comment about power is nonsensical as well. This is not the 80s anymore. Men who get laid as you say, which speaks volumes about the shallow and cynical way that you view it, are not talked about that way anymore. They may be envied but it’s because other guys are wondering how they pulled that off without getting in major trouble.
@@ne0x1ty Absolutely not true but RUclips is protecting your lies because I refuted your claims but my comment is nowhere to be found. What you said is absolutely untrue and male sexuality is vilified and effectively criminalized, and no of what you said maps onto reality in the current year.
I hope your parents are as proud of you as I would be.
Oh.
My.
God.
Erin, thank you for creating at least the second most important sociological video I've ever seen. (While being a little dry ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) in nearly the calmest, most balanced way I imagine a person could do, you showed that either men or women who push their advantages over others will cause the pain and downfall of very many. I want as many women- and men- to succeed and prosper as possible, but how unfortunate it is for the majority of people to have shown that they don't. You are a very rare teacher, and I want to say thank you so much again for your public service, please keep up the interstellar work, and take care.
@@acceletron You are welcome 🙏
@@erinbyrd5377 :^)
"Every society rests on a barbarian base. The people who don't understand civilization, and wouldn't like it if they did. The hitchhikers. The people who create nothing, and who don't appreciate what others have created for them, and who think civilization is something that just exists and that all they need to do is enjoy what they can understand of it-luxuries, a high living standard, and easy work for high pay. Responsibilities? Phooey! What do they have a government for?"
...."and now, the hitchhikers think they know more about the car than the people who designed it, so they're going to grab the controls"
...."and they have a democracy, and they are letting the enemies of democracy shelter themselves behind democratic safeguards." ― H. Beam Piper, Space Viking
@@spacedinosaur8733 Totally
Something to go on the reading list and great cover art.
Feminism appears to be more of a way to dismantle a Nation. Let me explain:
It's not 'Feminists' who are the problem, as they are just naive to the words of sneaky, 'snake-oil salesman'. While both women and men can be manipulated by, 'faulty-products' shady marketing, bad philosophy, false promises etc..(bad men).. when these products and Ideas are sold, exclusively to women, there's a weak spot where 'good men', ironically, can not help.
If men are best suited to be protectors of women, in any given society or nation.. This is the week spot. Foreign Adversaries want your country to fail. Tricking women into hating their men only makes the 'bad guys' happy, as our Nation suffers as a whole.
Piper was a great author, sad he left us so soon. He did it on his own terms, even if we don't understand them.
One of my favorite authors.
Growing up I was always subjected to the line "If women were in charge there would be no wars". When I got old enough to have my own opinion I would bite back with lines like "If women were in charge, the world leaders cycles would all sync up and we'd have a global conflict every 28 days or so", which as you can imagine did not go down well. Then one day I decided to research female rulers throught history and found very few were not involved in a war and just as capable of commiting atrocities. Queen Ranavalona I of Madagascar was so cruel and barbaric that she was responsible for 50-75% of of deaths of Madagascar's population. I wrote down a long list of every queen throughout history and what they were involved in, and when I heard that line again, I read it out to them and miraculously, I never heard it again....
Guess I need to do more research. Good job 👍
Love it
Stupid claims by stupid people being corrected
I would very much like you to give us that list for science.
I want the list too. I'm in education. This list can impact greatly.
Victoria was also not nice, Elisabeth 1, also not. And the "queen if seven heavens" (Maya) also...
Anyone who has anything negative to say about this video is actually saying more about themselves.
To anyone who thinks there would be peace if women ruled the world, I ask: have you ever seen two women who are angry at each other? Female vs female anger is more intense than any other wrath.
I think matriarchies fail for the same reason Bumble got rid of their "only women can message first" mechanic.
At the end of all things. We all simply expect men to step up. And that's really all there is to it.
If men all disappeared, even the most devout feminist would still expect a man somewhere.... somehow.... to just appear and take care of something they need help with.
wait why did they get rid of it?
@@AnimalAlmighty Because women were complaining that they had to make the first move. You know. The entire point of the App. If I had to guess they didn't like being rejected instead of being the one doing the rejecting.
Women ruin things.
Whereas a tyrannical father says “Do it, your feelings be damned” a tyrannical mother requires you to like it as well” (edited)
@@kc6810 You dont need to live here. You can leave anytime.
@@kc6810 Women could change if they wanted to. And we should want to; what women, as a group, are doing is destroying everything.
@@kc6810because there are not only tyrannical parents in this world.
@@kc6810well, if you consider yourself to be a tyrannical mother to be - then don't, your unborn children would thank you for that mercy.
@@GlasbanGorm Don't say things like that.
Your sociology teacher gave you an F for this essay, didn't she?
F for Fantastic, Fabulous, yeah.
The very first minute alone gave me flashbacks of the 2024 barbie movie.
"If society does become a matriarchy, it's because Men would allow it to happen. All men would have to do is say 'we're stopping this social experiment' and that would be the end of it." - Spot on.
Sadly the men of today cannot say NO to a woman.
Indeed, I see signs that men are starting to wake up.
@@DaveRoberts308Are they? Where are the men's rights activists demanding equality in the selective service or male quotas for teachers? They are still being ignored and nobody is talking about the MRM because the matriarchy censors and nobody discusses ideas that they don't even know exist.
MGTOW is on it
@@RandomDarter I totally disagree. As a man I understand the frustration and relationship dysfunction that drives men to want to go their own way, but MGTOW separates men from women entirely. But men need to take back society from those women, then work with those women to build families and societies.
I'm not here to argue pro vs con of MGTOW; that's pointless. But I'm saying that men need to take back society, not divorce themselves from it.
If women were in charge, we'd still be living in grass huts - Camille Paglia
Well she’s wrong cuz what’d happen is an opposing force like China would quickly take over.
Yes, but we’d have nice cushions 😄
@@drstrangelove4998 😜
@@drstrangelove4998 So many that it would be impossible to sit on the couch...
I don't know about that. Women tend to be a civilizing influence on men since women demand much more of their living conditions and lifestyles than men. Men are much more willing to live with less and to endure everyday hardship than women.
I'd think that in a matriarchy, we'd have many more creature comforts than we do now, because that is what women tend to want that men do not.
Matriarchies fail because women believe that a hug can fix everything.
They also will require everyone to pee sitting down.
I feel lucky to catch such an insightful creator at this early stage of having only a few tens of thousands of subs. Well-written and thought-provoking piece.
poverty always restores the natural state of things
this.
God save the earth from women.
Talk about your grave yard cheer leader. Are you bragging or complaining?
NOPE! It just reminds us why we modified human nature in the first place.
@@hoottasshell The way you used so few words to show that many malfunctions in your brain is downright impressive.
The women who I grew up around in the 60s and 70s were smarter funnier more resourceful and industrious and had self awareness . Humility is a sign of intelligence .
What? Those same women are the reason the world is the way it is right now.
@@chadcadsonvii5258 They were women who were young in the 40's .They were real women who loved being women . Not feminists.
I would challenge the idea that humility is a sign of intelligence. There are a lot of intelligent people that are arrogant because of their intelligence. I would say humility is more a sign of the ability to self reflect, and an ability to set aside one's self
COVID was an excellent sign on that.
There were a ton of "intelligent" experts and credentialed professionals who overnight adopted mantras, rituals and reveled in being petty tyrants.
@@aaronadamson7463 humility is a sign of good character, also of self awareness and situation/reality awareness imo
Nicely argued presentation. The problem is those who most need to listen to this information are opposed to the use of anything like evidence.
I have already watched a quite a few videos on this channel. All of them had well argued and substantiated points. Had not subscribed before, as I never subscribe based on having watched just a a handful of videos, despite liking them. Now I have watched enough. You have earned my subscription.
It’s so refreshing to hear a very intelligent woman talk about an arguably difficult subject for most women to discuss.
Where did you see an intelligent woman?
@@markherbert1978 LMAO... you sound like a Cuck... bet you're still a virgin...
@@markherbert1978 Definitely not your mom, because the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
@@Insomnolant1335Jesus man don't kill him
@@iantsai6082Nah let him cook
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." - George Orwell.
Not true in this day and age, those rough men would rather do business with those that seek to do "us" harm...
Men are also the ones doing the harm though lol
You know, I wonder about this sometimes. Its the same logic the US military uses. But what I wonder... do we even need this kind of protection in the first place? Is life really so harsh that we need to be protected with violence?
I don't know about you, but I've been able to protect people through indirect means far more effectivly than violence. I could be strong with muscles and threaten those who might harm my family... but all it takes is one other person with a gun to end all that protection.
If you really want to protect those you love... violence isn't the best way to do it. You have to extend your influence and reach so far, that nobody has any reason to harm you. In fact, people around you are so loyal to you because of your aid and influence, that they will PROTECT YOU.
This, shows how backwards we have it all....
@@JackPitmanNica Our "civilization" is not for ever, when economics crashes or some other important event occurs, words would not protect you from those who will try to take all from you. We live among animals...
@@raziel4949 Perhaps. Or perhaps, we are fundementally incapable of imagining peace. In Somalia, there was a period of anarchy. This period is one of the more peaceful periods in recent Somalian history.
On another similar vein; back in the 1980s the US had plenty of ideas about what was going to happen when the USSR fell. Many people in the USA brass beleived that the USSR falling meant world war. Nobody believed that the USSR would fall peacefully.
Let me ask you, what ended up happening?
We are so wired to violence - that we are unable to see the peace within ourselves - that we are unable to see a peaceful option...
Thank you being reasonable and fighting back against the echo chamber❤
"Kids don't need a bigger house they need values instilled in them" those words will stick with me.
Ironically, this is almost the same goal for communism. The values may differ.
Feminism has transformed the economic relationship between men and women from being complementary to competitive.
@@LawrenceMclean 100 %
Also agree, heard it out of my wife’s mouth the one year she made more money than me out of the 11 years we were married.
Women should have realized that in a good economic partnership with men most of them can benefit from his success more than they could achieve on their own. This is not men oppressing women. Rather it's men and women in a successful partnership oppressing their competitors of either sex. It only looks like oppression if women are determined to go it alone without partnering with men. (This only works for highly skilled, dedicated, focused women like old-time female physicians who were usually childless and often unmarried.) If they want to have children without men, this only works if the state takes over the role of husband/provider, which women in western countries have ensured that it does!
In addition, since the jobs women do are not as valuable (wealth-producing) as the ones men do (as Ms Byrd points out), when women try to work for money, the wages they earn just contribute to price inflation: more money chasing the same amount of valuable goods. (That's why it takes two incomes to live nowadays. The woman's wages simply push up prices.) No one will voluntarily pay for an HR department. It and the employees there (almost all female) exist only to comply with various government regulations that act as a make-work program. Same with social work Health care employs as many people as it does because it is substantially free or subsidized, so people buy more of it than they would if they had to pay for it. Teaching is valuable only if it produces better outcomes than home-schooling could. Our parents believed it did. Who does anymore? And female-dominated teachers unions ruined it! So unless women are working in the true private sector, producing wealth in return for a wage the employer pays willingly to purchase value, women's work is mostly inflationary and therefore valueless.
The idea that women should be able to go it alone and out-compete men is fundamentally a lesbian philosophy. Because lesbians *can't* countenance forming an economic partnership with men, they are driven into seeing themselves as oppressed. Same is true of heterosexual women who can't attract a man: they are doomed to bitter loneliness, the kind of soil in which Marxist philosophy germinates and thrives.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 Very well said-thank you.
@@lesliemacmillan9932 I liked your comment. Everything you stated is correct, however, there is another dimension that is not discussed, and not allowed to be discussed (as I have found out).
Western civilization is being destroyed. At a certain level in the political class the idea is that it is being destroyed to make something better. At a level of power above them, there is a somewhat more sinister motivation to restore Civilization to a state in which it serves to benefit solely those who own it (ordinary citizens being reduced to serfs). At the highest level, I think the motivation is revenge. There is evidence for my outlandish theory, however, you have to find it for yourself.
Preaching to the choir. Subscribed just to support you. Good luck and keep up the good work.
This is spot-on correct in my opinion. The world would be a better place if women stopped complaining about being oppressed, and started actively investing of themselves in their homes and families. Things wouldn't be better if women ran things. It's better when they are at home taking care of the family, the kids, and the home. It's on their shoulders to make good, solid families with their husbands and quit wanting to run off and work for a paycheck. It's really that simple. Quit thinking you're oppressed. You're not. You were fulfilling a unique role in the home. Only women can do that, so quit complaining and get back to it.
Why is it a competition between men and women? Why are we not on the same side? Why are we not a team?
Why is it a competition between men and women? Why are we not on the same side? Why are we not a team?
There is no greater hell than people blaming each other for everything and nothing getting done.
I work at a place where about 90% of the workers are female. It is Hell. All they do is complain for 8-12 hours nonstop. Trash talk the boss, ignore men like they are not there and keep backstabbing everyone while they try to destroy everyones reputation by mocking, lying and spreading rumours.
Meanwhile all the men are just having fun and are very respectful with eachother.
Women...☕
So said Adam and Eve
I base it on personal experience and not on findings or studies. I grew up in two different homes.
As a child youngest of 4 my mother decided she no longer wanted to be with her husband ( my dad). Till age of 12 I grew up with my mother and 2 older sisters and a brother , My life was miserable and absolutely chaotic. Then I moved in with my father till I went off to join the military. He turned me into a responsible, respectful, self sustainable, physically active athlete, and disciplined man.
Meanwhile my older brother has been in and out of jail throughout his life, and my 2 sisters' lives are a mess .
I owe him my life.
The sadist thing is that she destroyed our family just because she claimed that my dad was too difficult to live with because he was a Vietnam veteran and that he was too serous, she wanted her life to be more carefree and fun.
Got her cake and wanted all to herself.
Respect to your father for overcoming the trauma of war to raise you. I wish peace to you both.
A woman will sacrifice her family for her own happiness
As an older woman I believe Hollywood & woman's magazines took over by design the cultural formation roles formerly done by the tribe. When the economic crash happens women will need to go back to our reality based roles. BUT if we do not grasp the power of media in the hands of people who hate humanity & uses us like cattle we will slide back. I pray thus does not happen.
@@AlphaChad-mi6pj A man will too sometimes.
First time I've heard of you. Great video and you have a new subscriber...until YT unsubscribes me when I'm not paying attention.
Very eloquent and poignant. I appreciate you doing the reading/research and presenting the topic in a very matter-of-fact type of way, unbiased and unburdened by political leanings.
10/10 video. Subscribed.
P.S. : This is only the tip of the iceberg. There are so many underlying patterns that keep repeating themselves that are slowly eroding at progress and society as a whole. Never stop questioning the status-quo, but make an effort to understand just why it exists in the first place. That is the key to improvement.
Modern people in power have forgotten that with great power comes great responsibility.
They forgot me
Spiderman really is the best hero.
You really need to stop living in fantasy land...you're fictional little quotes don't mean a damn thing, and you nonces keep spewing them thinking you're clever for it.
Its like in that old joke:
Heaven is when germans are engineers and italians are cops
Hell is when germans are cops and italians are engineers
Never heard that before, any references by chance?
@@brainkill7034 Its an old joke that have multiple versions. Just google heaven is when germans are engineers joke
Gold
How is this relevant to the topic being discussed?
@@vanbeet5105 Relevant in the sense that a system works great in one way, but if the roles reverse, it would be horrible.
To humans: love, learn and laugh. The secret to life is charity and humor. My 100 year old grandfather told me this. He was a model citizen, devote father, local business owner and to this day ive never seen a love as strong and pure towards my grandmother. Defined roles that were so complimentary. Rest in peace grandma and grandpa. Thank you for teaching our family. Love and miss you deeply
"To humans"? What are you, an alien addressing us humans? (I agree with your grandpa, tho.)
@samr.england613 yah looks weird my bad. Meant "To all humans"
Stuff like this really goes to show that women don't love men for shit. And that the truth is, they use men to opportunistically get benefits.
No wonder why women are not raised how to treat a man.
Men never stopped keeping up their end of the bargain, women nowadays seem to blame even their lack of sacrifice to us men for some reason.
A world without men: Lights out, water off, sewer backing up. Chaos. Watch any apocalypse movie.
And empty store shelves because there aren't enough women trained to drive trucks and trains, or fix them. Most would be dead in less than a year.
👍
i start to imagine that
A world? More like a week.
Just watch beR grylls survival island the women practically started starving and would most likly died without the mens help
The great american 20th century philosopher Al Bundy got it right : "Don't try to understand women, women understand women and they hate each other."
@radeksparowski174 Al Bundy was only partly correct because in fact some genuinely high quality women do exist. But those women are only available to men at or near the top of "the food chain." Other men get stuck with the "leftovers," women who despite any physical beauty or mental acuity they may possess are only interested in men for how much they can manipulate and exploit them. Moreover a woman can be a "damsel in destress" without ceasing to be romantically attractive (a male human frailty). But once a women perceives any man as "weak" or "unstable" her perception to that affect immediately and forever destroys any romantic attraction she may have had for him.
I read something similar to that in one of the Archie comics, where Mr Lodge tells Archie that it isn't worth the effort to try and understand women, not even his daughter.
Wtf are you talking about that guy ain’t no philosopher he sounds more like a serial killer.
You forgot to mention his 4 touchdowns in a single game for Polk High
@@MiyamotoMusashi-lk1ec not related to that serial killer, just namesake, btw he earned his living by selling shoes....mostly to heavily overweight fugly women, but he really loved his family.....
forgot to mention that historically female monarchs are more likely to wage wars than their male counterparts. The reason for that is that during most of human history kings and emperors were expected to lead their armies directly in the battlefield putting their own lives at risk, something queens didn't had to do because women were not allowed on the battlefield.
Yup, its pretty much like that today in our modern military now. Higher ups who decide war never see any of it.
Bra-freaking-vo. Very well researched and thought out. Everyone needs to see this, I really hope it goes viral. You'll hit 100k subs in no time with more content like this. THANK YOU!
This randomly reminded me of a time when I saw a woman on the internet angrily complaining about the word "housewife". I don't remember exactly what she said but I remember that her logic expressed as an argument was something like...
1. Housewife insinuates that the woman is married to her house[her house's wife].
2. It is absurd and offensive to say that a woman is married to a house.
3. Therefore, the term "housewife" should not be used.
In my mind, the logic continued to it's conclusion.
4. Wives are women who are married to men.
5. If housewife wrongly implies that women are married to houses, then manwife would be more accurate by implying that a wife is married to a man.
So I asked her "Would you prefer to be called a manwife?". For some reason, I think she might have been offended
that was the proper response though 😎
Of course, this could mean that the house wife was the wife that got to stay in the house, while the others slept elsewhere
What should stay at home husbands be called then? Womenhusband? 💀
@@Ash-dj5ph idiots. But if you go by the precedent, it would be househusband, because he's the cuc... man that's taking care of her home and children.
@@Ash-dj5ph They should be called based.
Either a bridge fell down, or it didn’t. Having your own truth won’t re-alive the people who lost their lives.
sad but what can only be done is to be responsible enough to never let something like that ever happen again !!
Practically speaking patriarchy that i see around me, women are in charge.
maybe not as part of nobility, but on household, the madam of the house decide pretty much all social aspect of household.
You are smart. A lot of women would never realize this.
Finally people are starting to understand we are currently living in a matriarchy.
And this is why society will come to an end, because of women and effeminate men incharge. May they ALL have Hell to pay.
Then the cycle will repeat and become truly patriarchal again.
Until we realize that both feminism and machismo are sides of the same coin we won't reach anywhere.
The mistake that normies commit is thinking that feminism is a noble movement, while originally it was, it has heavily deviated and turned into a misandrist cesspit weaponized to hand life on a silver plate to women who don't put the effort at the expense of the 99% of males in the planet who can't even have their first kiss and are blamed in spite of unrealistic standards of females.
It's not about women are all bad or men are all bad, humans in spite of their gender are garbage, a gender activism won't just fix that core problem.
We need to understand this in order to advance......
No, this is just the latest counterculture. Most people don't see things that way at all, not even along political lines.
@@DutchCobbler no, we are living in a matriarchy. Most people are just blind to what they don't want to see. They are playing ignorant because they don't want to admit what's right in front of their eyes.
@@godleveleldritchblast5257 You misunderstand my remark. I was not denying that we are in a matriarchy, I refute the idea that people have become aware of it.
Matriarchy is already here and will continue to gain momentum so long as we have unlimited food and entertainment.
Actually, the ONLY reason that it continues is that men allow it to continue!
@@francisdashwood1760 No, that is a cope that women tell themselves. That is just another excuse women have concocted to convince themselves they aren't responsible.
We have guns. We have mass telecommunication technology. If women can convince even 5% of men to obey them blindly, those men can kill anyone that resists with technology. There is nothing regular men can do.
This is women's fault. And as I said in my first comment, it will not stop until society burns because people like you refuse to take responsibility for the power you have and the misuse of it.
Please keep denying it though. I am going to enjoy watching women suffer the consequences of their actions.
Women’s suffrage necessitates matriarchy.
Nope. The globalists won't allow it.
Frigid women after they become moms? Or the women who only want hookups? Procreation and family planning is all women’s responsibility @@francisdashwood1760
Coherent video again. It sounds like you're exceedingly well read, and read for understanding. An author I discovered late in life dove-tailed well with my appreciation for Dr. Jordan Peterson, and that's the late Dr. Thomas Sowell. He was one of the USA's most brilliant economists but marginalized because he was a black conservative. He examined tons of history using the tools of economics. In a way, he was like G K Chesterton in the sense that you start with some little article, then you're buying a book a month because the writing is so lucid!
I have a lot or respect for you cannot lie, we need more impartial and objective truths in this silly world
@@arnavprakash7991 Working on a new vid you might like, I'll have it up tomorrow hopefully
My mom has had almost infinitely more problems with female coworkers than with male.
Men resolve conflicts with the implied threat of violence. Since that in a workplace setting, let alone against a woman is absolutely INTOLLERABLE, they mostly chill, or they get fired.
Women? They resolve conflicts with reputation destruction, and that kind of thing is absolutely allowed, if not encouraged. She constantly had women sticking their nose into her business and trying to get her punished or fired over things that were none of their business.
EG: She once had to seriously deal with a complaint that she was "creating a hostile work environment" because she gave candy to her friend, but wouldn't share with the pricks who were always making trouble for her.
That's an interesting point. There was a place I worked in many years ago: one of my colleagues, who was a toxic feminist, actually admitted once that she once worked in an all female environment and she said she would never do that again, just because of how toxic, nasty, dysfunctional and destructive it was. It still didn't cure her of her toxic feminism, 'though, for some reason. No fool like an old fool I guess.
@@jackspring7709 True. They have enough pattern recognition to understand bad thing is bad, but not enough cognitive ability to work out why.
@@Nevir202 True. Its an extraordinary example of cognitive dissonance.
My former job at Aldi to a T. All my bosses were women nearly a decade younger than me, all of them were catty to eachother, infighting, fucking eachother over, playing favorites. It was hell. They’d rather play favorites and try to climb over eachother and pull up the ladder than actually be good managers
@@McGriddy51095 Yep, crabbing is a nightmare!
I’m a plumbing contractor for 34 yrs. When all women need anything repaired, replaced or maintained they call men to get the work done. Women and men both totally depend on men for their precious AC in summer, heat in winter and everything in a modern house and outside in society. Inside men built and maintain every modern connivence and machines such as the furnace, the plumbing, the electrical and machines that provide us with everything in modern life. Outside men also maintain everything including roads, electric, plumbing and homes. Without men society would fall apart and not be repaired or maintained. Without men women would not have a toilet, a shower, a furnace for heat or a condenser for AC. Without men modern society would cease to exist.
Having just bought an apartment this year, I really appreciate all the handymen that did the building and outfitting. I also looked for local craftsmen with experience, not some cheap, imported labour that commercial landlords often go for. Learned a lot from them, as I'm less "hands on" as an IT engineer.
Literally no woman did any of the actual work involved, especially not one of those feminists who constantly complain that they don't earn the same as men with their idiotic art school degree.
Plenty of men don't work these trades. There are women that do. The women who work trades are FAR better than the men that don't at the job. You really have to make it a man vs woman thing when you have to understand, many years ago women weren't even allowed to do this kind of work and are hundreds of years behind. Now in this day and age, you have less men and more women pursuing this line of work due to the expansion of industries, where more people can enter different fields of work. Think about those who work at hospitals as well, as nurses, as doctors and the gender balance is more equal, also in the hospitality industry too. When men who don't do trades brag about men building everything, those men have NO RIGHT to claim the achievements of other people simply because they share the same sex. That's the same argument as 'white men invented everything' said by a white man who never invented a thing in their life.
@@svr5423 You wouldn't even hire men who are from a foreign background. What makes anybody think you would have hired a woman who works trades? You already have your biases in place, don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't.
@@codesm96 So you think hiring only craftsmen who are qualified is a "bias"?
So you imply that women cannot be qualified?
@@codesm96 "don't act like this comment proves your point because it doesn't"
If we want to get into the useless ramifications of dialectics here, that's a trial of intent fallacy, as he never explicited the OP's post "proved" his point.
So don't expect yourself to be right either, as you start with an assumption (that could very well be true, but that's beside the point).
Nor did you know for what reasons he wouldn't choose foreign labor, so that can't be used as a solid argument either for anything (such as that weak correlation : "You already have your biases in place", when you don't actually even know which they are).
Then, you conveniently omit his last sentence, which indeed, tends to confirm the OP's point. So where you at?
Rationality without actual logical biases , seems a luxury.
Here's a book recommendation."The Corner That Held Them", a fiction book written by Silvia Townsend Warner in the 1940s. It's about a medieval nunnery where the nuns do awful things to one another, and it's considered a feminist book.
@@dryden0100 This sounds good
I've learnt a lot from your video. Although I may not agree with every bit of it, I sincerely admire your great courage to speak out in the current social milieu where any one who even suggests that he/she is thinking something different from the current prevailing dogma gets labelled and attacked. And I think your final solution is the best of all, for both men and women, that we should make it a priority to teach values to our kids in order to build a better tomorrow. Thanks.
Never met a happy feminist but have met happy housewives.
People see what they want to see, unless they practice objectivity.
The happiest women I've ever met were nuns..I met one happily married woman but she wasn't a housewife and her husband was rich. They had one child. There's no general definition of happiness.
Same with men who sleeps around think they are alpha, they see nothing but a used up needles
I'm from Spain. In my country, when a woman marries, she keeps her surname. When she has children, they are given two surnames. The first is the father's, the second is the mother's. A person in Spain keeps their two surnames for life, hence why a married woman does not take her husband's name. There has been a trend though, of some married women adding their husbands surnames to the end of their two existing surnames. It is usually added with the use of the word "de" preceeding it. These women end up with three surnames. An example of this could be something like Maria del Mar Fernandez Alonso de Gutierrez. Too long..
@@NightinGal89 yes there is a definition of happiness , but you're probably meaning to say theres not anything in particular thatll make general human more happy, which is also nonsense. *morality of leftism vs rightism : fundemental motivation: one cannot even be sane without morality for your own sake regardless of morality . often, genes that spread are genes that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading, genes limit potential prettiness, pateince, intelligence(empathy correlates with better), lactose intolerance etc. .
most people are habitually a mindless product of their environment, the ones that arnt remind theirself of what they must prioritize regularly, like every night. ...... increasingly popular mental illness is part of the worldwide shift to more loyalty to supporting immoral corporate-government machine in the worship of games like chasing low quality social status and overdosing into desensitization in lazy lifestyle. ................habitually remind yourself that people should instead win challenges especially in terms of long term collaborative trusting relationships. then prioritize existential exploration to ward off anxiety of what you couldve done, without spending all the time on it so you can ward off anxiety of missing out on other things , especially if you havnt been making much progress in exploration. then prioritize aesthetics. winning challenges is games, not being bored overdose desensitized consumer whos become too lazy to appreciate things, improve things, etc, because hes habitually isnt required much effort per reward.
.....................the people practicing and promoting the mental illness also wage war against abrahamic religions. think of your relationship with the creator of everything as a game you having to figure out what to do, so you do what seems rational based on what you were apparently made to do, which is to be happy,. this is close to what tour genetically made to do, which is spreading your genes, because genes that spread are the ones that help spreading or at least dont prevent spreading. judge yourself as if you are someone else. are your feelings functional? do you max information sharing for max likelihood of even unexpected productivity? you are not the creator of everything, you cant know so much, influence things minimaly unless you are very confident your influencing goodly
vocational science of freedom how your assets are stolen from birth on youtube,odysee,rumble etc. yandex instead of google,types of linux instead of windows/mac. ................... so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life :see book called divine speech by nouman ali khan and sharif randhawa says " The Qur' an itself refers to its unmatched beauty and power as a proof of its divine origin, challenging its detractors to produce something comparable to it, or even to a single portion of it, if they claimed it was of human design (I0:38; 11: 13; 17:88). " "The smallest chapter (Surah) in the Quran is Surah Al-Kawthar. It is the 108th chapter and consists of only three verses. " - chatgpt .,so many people memorize quran word for word, unlike any other text.how a real muslim believes in islam, including the promise of heaven whos reward is greater than anything anyone ever has before, and hell, a punishment worse than anything else, in exchange for practicing islamic morality, a grandeur purpose of life
@@NightinGal89 I mean if you take a sampling of tiktok right now you will see woman after woman after woman who drank the feminist kool aid ranting about how much their life sucks and blaming everyone except themselves. The mental gymnastics some of them go through to blame everything on men is quite frankly gold medal worthy. And the rest of the time they're huffing high grade copium.
Don't see too many married women being miserable online unless they're feminists.
Nobody abuses power more than someone whose never had it.
And people are going to actually vote for Kamala Harris…….ha ha ha ha we may have a chance at. A matriarchal government soon.
@@rodterrell304 may as well start playing the violins now
@@rodterrell304I’m never voting for Kamala Harris. She’s a wicked and cruel person.
@@rodterrell304 she will get the baked in dem votes in the usual places, but probably not in the swing states where she needs them, hence she will need someone like Josh Shapiro or Andy Bashear as a VP, but that decision will be made by the DNC machine and the donors, who are the ones who ultimately made the decision to jettison uncle joe.
@@rodterrell304what does Kamala Harris have anything to do with this? She was a district attorney and an attorney general before becoming a senator. How is this any different than many of the men who served in those three roles?
Subbed. Profoundly brave. Keep making awesome, thought provoking content!
Great work on this! I hope it reaches more people. The pursuit of truth is the most important value. Sad to see universities throw that idea away
I have worked in two female dominated professions, and neither are any fairer or "better" than working in male dominated professions. There's a lot more back-stabbing and subterfuge, though. I appreciate the honesty of other men. I appreciate the willingness to accept mistakes and do better the next time of women.
Me too
whats with female professions, they seem to be constantly stressed and burnt out despite work itself aint that hard... is it that highschool constant "game" socially to keep up to avoid that bad side?
Granted for male dominated ones any tiny sign of weakness causes same thus mistakes should not often be admitted.
I've worked with my hands my entire life. I have never been in a male dominated field (which is the only kind of work I have ever done) where mistakes have not been accepted or forgiven as long as the one who made the mistake isn't a complete mess-up and the mistake was honest and learned from. If a man *genuinely* apologizes and actually *wants* to do better and doesn't just brush it off as 'no big thing' then he'll be accepted and even taught better. Every time. Never had it any other way anywhere and I've worked in some nasty fields.
It's about Merit with men. Earn your way, learn your way, do well, don't be a burden. If something comes up for a dude that tears him apart (divorce papers, girlfriend cheating, departed friend or family member), guess what! We're there for each other. It's times like *that* when we cover for each other and carry that 'dead weight', and be there for one of our brothers. Nobody else cares about us, society hates us, so we care for each other in ways women will never, ever be able to understand.
You don't know. You can't know. You'll never know.
The one, single time I took an office job in a female dominated field it was an utter nightmare of backstabbing, underhanded social maneuvers, fake smiles, fake friendships, dissing each other behind each others backs (and never, ever saying anything about it!), following along behind the most toxic leadership imaginable without one peep about the wrongness of what is going on, and more. It was the worst two weeks of my life.
I'm convinced women aren't capable of love at this point. You don't even have friends; you have 'girls I don't hate today, but secretly envy or want to tear down'. Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over.
@@SoulSoundMuisc Yup, there's a reason that imperial harems were known to be brutal bloodthirsty places. Mix the worst traits of women with actual power plays, assassinations and poisoning...
@@SoulSoundMuisc PREACH!!!
"Some of the stuff that comes out your mouths, a dude would lose teeth over."
Have literally witnessed this and thought the exact same thing.
Who will climb down waist deep in human waste to clean out the sanitary products they insist the didn’t flush? 😂
😂😂😂
The male slaves
@@AssortedGamer696 definitely not married.
I've visited those matriarchal households where the man instructs guests to leave the toilet seat down as a courtesy. Lift the seat and every time you'll see dried old pee splatter accumulated on the underside. Gross! Be sure to look the woman of the household in the eye when you tell her you always leave the seat up if only to wipe the gross pee splatter and leave it obviously clean for the next person.
@@AssortedGamer696 It's a joke, smart man.
Stick to your games.
The first target of feminism in didnsntling the family was to take away a woman's option to enter into and/or remain in a polygamous marriage.
My own ancestor was a second wife who was happy until new laws forced her to live like a mistress visited by a man her children called "Uncle" instead of his true title of Father.
Eliza R. Snow wrote (in an essay i found through the footnotes of "Saints Volume 2") of how the people opposed to Latter-day Saint polygamy were themselves obsessed with sex, and incapable of viewing plural marriage as anything but an opportunity for more sex. She said that those men were mad when they visited Utah because there was no "bawdy house" nor women who would engage in casual sexual relations.
Eliza R Snow said that men on the East Coast didn't want their mistresses getting any ideas about being honest women together. And while her accusations regarding the moral character of head anti-polygamists of the time may have been wrong. What she said about the consequences of banning plural marriage is absolutely correct;
Now we have hypergamy with aversion to both marriage and childrearing.
Now that I've said my piece on the matter, please do mistake me. I am a Latter-day Saint, and i stand for our policy of monogamy. But the government ban on polygamy was designed by mortals to destroy our church; and the plan to do so was given them by infrrnal forces seeking to destroy the family.
Additionally, the legal precedents set by Reynolds vs The United States and related cases are instrumental in the ongoing destruction of the family unit and free speech.
What a breath of fresh air for a man for whom women are his equal in their differences.
Thank you. Well researched and well said. Another good example often cited is that "survivor competition" they did once with men on one island and women on another. The women had troubles building shelter, trapping food, and avoiding danger. If memory serves, they needed to be rescued before the end of their scheduled time. By the end of the test, the men had created basic shelter and were hunting. And they had figured out how to get freshwater and how to safely dispose of their solid waste so that they wouldn't spread disease to each other.
@@justaskin8523 One big difference is that men know how to cooperate with each other and women don't.
@@erinbyrd5377 Another good example is the late Queen Elizabeth. While she made many charities and public service organisations, the negative effects Matriachy influence is especially insidious in England, even if it's invariably unintentional on her part. Ever since she rose to power, the Court system and Justice system in England slowly started to erode mens right's in court of law. Today, if a man got falsely accused of doing something to a women, generally speaking the Judge will always side with women even if he is innocent. Johnny Depp is a prime example of this where he lost the case in England despite the overwhelming evidence supporting his story. If they are falsely accused, men do not stand a chance. And a lot of women are starting to catch on to that fact and take advantage of that system. For example, I know a British youtuber who has a big channel and very popular got falsely accused by two women and lawyered up but his attorney likely told him there's no point litigating this and just give in to the demands which the two women wanted large sums of money knowing he was rich. He had no choice but to acquiesce to the extortion. Matriarchies do not work.
I remember that. The women told everyone they won’t need any help from the men. A week later they still couldn’t build a fire and were freezing cold. The girls told everyone they would beat the men in the competition, but when it got hard, they all went over the the men’s side of the island and flirted with the men to try and stand next to their fire and get warm.
👍👍
@@luminatrixfanfiction Thumbs up. Thank you for sharing that.... more indisputable daughters of satan.
"Everything's fine today, that is our illusion” - Voltaire
ruclips.net/video/h-U6g89YBRA/видео.htmlsi=t7OYUuxupEMbQxyq
Voltaire also said he would destroy the christian faith. He was a Jesuit. If you read the Jesuit oath you will know they are evil.
@@ianmonk6211Jesuit def aren’t evil lol. Conspiracy brain. But Voltaire was ass and not a Christian
@@ianmonk6211 and? i have had enough damage to my family caused by christianity why not cause some damage back
@@thecoolestofthe834s2 that would be the false Christianity the bible predicts will arise
The biological differences between our sexes will never change. Your video clearly expresses that fact.
Stumbled upon this video, and I'm glad I did. I'd never heard of Standpoint Theory, but it tied together so many things I've noticed in society but lacked the knowledge to name. I found this entire video very enlightening.
And I hope you won't mind my saying I think you're an absolutely lovely lady, and you have a very soothing voice. I listened to this on the way to work this morning and forgot all about how bad Dallas traffic can be.
"Women cannot impose a matriarchy without the cooperation of men, but men can impose a patriarchy without the cooperation of women." -Facts
American Survivor did a episode where it was one team of all men vs one team of all women, but they lived at the same beach. The women mooched off of the men to survive.
thank god for that
🎯💯
So you're saying... men are more powerful? And... might makes right? Or something. There is so much idiocy in this comment section I don't even know anymore.
@churchofsolipsism2716 The original comment was a quote from the video. Do you not see the quotation marks?🤦🏾♂️
Women don't understand "with great power comes great responsibility"
Women avoid accountability like the plague.
Neither do men, it seems. Think of atom bombs, poisons used on food, pollution of the planet. Yep. Men have royally fd everything up.
@@allynflinchbaugh4570 The fastest animal on Earth is a woman running from accountability.
Seriously. Like this is a funny joke and yet its not. Compare Toby Macguire's Spider-Man to the She-Hulk. Down-trodden and self-sacrificing versus successful and twerking. One a hero,....the other just a self-interested individual. Women,....and super-HEROES have nothing to do with each other. Marvel destroyed itself by not understanding that.
@@truthseekerodinson5094 His Spiderman lost his family, friends, job, even his powers and nearly dies (more than once) and yet, he still chose to be a hero and put others first.
This is a role model.
Meanwhile She hulk was all "Yeah but, I like, got wolf whistled at", and "My life is SOOOOOooooooooooo much harder than yours because of the patriarchy", while twerking in her really expensive lawyers office. She'd rather be rich and famous than do what it take to be a true hero.
This is sad.
Flawless explanation on the subject. It deserves many many more views 🙏🏼
Now let's go into every educational institution in Western society and get ALL students to watch this 25 minute video so that they actually can reflect on the trajectory of our society and understand that the social 'experiment' we've been carrying out the last 3-6 decades is failing.
Thank you for restoring my faith in the ability of members of the generations of Americans younger than my, Boomer, generation to think sensibly and rationally about social issues.
My mother was born in '30 and started college at 16. My grandmother expected her to get married, but my grandfather said 'you want to go to college? See the world? go do it'. And she did.
As an historian I have read a great deal of regular people stories. In the 19th century your everyday farm family had the father and son handling grain crops and maybe herd animals, maybe take the herd or grain to town. Women tended to take care of the garden, milk cow, orchard, cooking and cleaning. The work was done. No one was oppressed. Everyone did something. Who was oppressed there?
90% of the population, working people, systematically exploited by the owner class. 78 hour weeks, no breaks, no overtime, no job security, no benefits, no retirement.
"an historian" is how we know you are an historian.
Why do you hate women?
@@jeravincer Why do you murder puppies?
An exception you just made up means nothing.
You can't run away fast enough from someone who uses terms like "my truth", "manifest", "partner." 🏃♂️➡️
hit the like button
w8, what's wrong with "partner"?
@@vesuvius1318because it's wife or husband. Partner completely demeans the relationship.
@@ronwatford7331 or fiance or boyfriend/girlfriend... i get what you're saying, though i'd be less concerned about that over starsigns lol
Next time someone asks me my sign, i'll just make something up, and watch their mental gymnastics.
@@ronwatford7331women want partners because bringing home a paycheck is nothing compared to all the 24 hr responsibilities wives have. And those things can’t be put off till later like mowing the lawn.
50/50 is a lie. I hate to seem like an ahole, but I'm tired of having this conversation. Every man must emancipate himself, because men are more incredulous than women. I have neither the time nor the patience
Wow! You blew me away. I came to your channel expecting the worst. In less than 3 1/2 minutes you had me completely turned around. Thank you
Great to see a small and good channel finally get picked up by the algorithm.
Amazing how women can get their minds right when they're up against the impending draft 😂🤣
bingo!
But...aren;t there women already in the military?
@@debrawehrly6900 - reading comprehension much, cupcake?
DRAFT.
IMBECILE.
@@debrawehrly6900 - reading comprehension much?
DRAFT.
Don't need a d to fly a drone. However, have you seen the stats on female gamers?
Hearing you talk common sense, is infinitely more attractive than every indecent only fans account combine.
Ikr, I'm VERY attracted to intelligence, it is the most attractive trait a person can have, ofc that doesn't mean you have to be smart for me to like you, but still it's awesome
Edit I should clarify what type of intelligence I'm talking about, I'm talking about the kind and considerate intelligence, not the "I'm right and you're retarded for not thinking the same way I am" type of intelligence, those people are a huge turn off
Facts
What are the common sense takes she discusses?
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAXS
@@vicentesanchezjr.3877 Joker: You wouldnt get it....
An excellently constructed piece! Would it be fair to say a patriarchy uses truth and logic, whilst a matriarchy prioritizes emotions and feelings; the former allows for the creation and expansion of human society, where the latter, seems, to be destructive and anathema to said society!?
Ms. Byrd, you are a lady and a scholar. I've discovered in your channel a voice of reason, grace, and hope. Thank you.
I’m glad as of late I’m seeing women speaking and pushing back against the chaotic society we live in today. I pray for this channel, to accomplish their goals in stimulating minds across the U.S.A for deeper understanding.
Yes, but those women are only speaking out and "pushing back" as you call it because it benefits them. They're unable to make a go of life without the assistance of men... so they're trying to come back into the fold.
*Useful CHAMELEONS.*
Women are SURVIVORS. It's their natural tendency to align with the winning side (in this case Men) to up their odds of Survival. Women are realising that Men are waking up n are refusing to Marry them. So they are changing colours ...
In the coming times, you will see more n more Wom3n doing that.
Notice how she said that 'I have compassion for the Women who do S3x work online' and that 'we live in an Unforgiving Society'. Both are the talking points of a Woman who has skeletons in the Closet.