The problem with this kind of DNA storing or how it can be used against u (privacy concerns etc.) is for example different types of companies use that information to prey or capitalize and make personalized ads on your addicitons or tendencies towards addictions that are in your DNA. Sooner or later people would sell that kind of information for profit. People could also not give u a job for example because they could see u have a higher chance of getting some kind of disease or that u have some kind of disease. Maybe people would discriminate people with weaker DNAs ( being more prone to disease). Maybe partner matching would change. Because u could just search them and see what kind of disabilities they have but that's if that kind of data would go public.
I'm confused what u are trying to say here but if u thikn i was complaining, I think u missunderstood the comment. I was just brain storming what could happen with this kind of technology.
did anyone else have this bus come to their elementary school one day and have everyone take dna swabs for whatever reason? i feel like it may be more common than you would think also
It's not about people that commit crimes, it's about being related to someone that did, and the possibility that governments can use it to crush dissent. And the fact people can use it to discriminate is a monkaW.
I'm inclined to believe it, but how would the government use it to crush dissent? Like find DNA from a dissenter and track it to the individual instead of catching the dissenter physically?
@@S85B50Engine They can do that already, idk if that's a legitimate reason to not collect DNA. I would say the government should not be unconditionally trusted, they do not have your best interests at heart and if you or anyone believes that, then you are delusional of history and even just the current age. There needs to be separation between the government getting everything it needs to control your life or you very easily end up like modern day China or the world described by Orwell's 1984. Man was not made to be cattle and you should not willingly submit to it or worst help facilitate it.
@@KOSJ153 And then there's the fact that for example medical insurance companies could discriminate people because they have a higher chance of getting some medical issue and making their medical insurance rates skyrocket, or employers not hiring "high health risk" people. Kind of like how the world would become what it is in Gattaca (the 1997 film).
@@S85B50Engine then make it a law that no one can refuse to give someone insurance??? This is what happens when you privatize health care and insurance smh. Either way, the insurance thing is about the best argument so far, everything else is rebuttaled.
"What if someone uploads someone else's DNA and commits a crime to frame them" there would be no DNA of the other person at that scene there would be yours and they would use your relatives to find you there would be no framing as they can build a family tree without DNA so all they would have to do is get a similar DNA hit like one of your cousins, build a family tree based off a common ancestor, eliminate people that don't fit your general description, and your done after they get some of your DNA off a Starbucks coffee cup and match it to the scene of the crime. The only way it would work is if you got someone else's DNA and put it on the crime scene making sure that they had no alibi or were not scene by a witness away from the crimescene. Then maybe uploading DNA would work but I doubt you would get away with it. To make sure the other person doesn't have an alibi would be the difficult part.
i think its misphrased- what if you submit your DNA with someone else's name on it? Then your crime would be traced to someone else. Won't do miracles, but will still catch people off guard.
how about we make some clones or test tube babies or fuck it lets just go down the china route and make a new and improved (for better memes) hoomon bean.
Why do we give killers cool names Why name him “golden state killer”, that sounds like a awesome name for my PS3 back in the day Name him “shit eater” or something, then less people will want to do crimes, who like to be called shit eater
Well yeah, but you cant be/ hard to be found because "your name" and the fake dna already became 1 individual. Unless you are being tested again or your physical appearance is known in the crime scene.
Its surprising she hasn't gotten sued what she said about the victims problem of not dying being a personal problem. Oh it isnt the perpetrators problem of assaulting someone its the victims problem for not dying so we can help. Its like saying we cant help a student whos been badly beaten by another student because he doesnt have broken bones so its the beaten students problem
that info can be used against you. for advertising, being discriminated against by health insurance when they see that you have a proclivity for certain diseases etc. that information is literally EVERYTHING about you how could it not be a privacy issue??
@@avenoktys3253 I mean, I'm not sure how this is THAT concerning for some people. Like yeah if you are at higher risk premiums can be adjusted, but that means that risk is already there. Not something just conjured out of thin air. I don't get how targeted advertising is such a horror show to some people. Ok, I get more relevant ads, so what? You're getting them anyways. Now how much and where ads should show up is a different conversation, but if you HAVE to see an ad anyways, wouldn't you rather it be something you're interested in rather than something that's completely irrelevant? It's rare that an ad causes me to buy something but there have been times where targeted advertising shows me something I need, when I need it, and I end up buying it.
@@avenoktys3253 1. Just get adblocker, they're literally free and take 1 sec to download, literally 2. Make it illegal to discriminate people and not give them health insurance someone said why and how it would work in the comments, it was an essay so I'm not typing why it could work
@@JohnDoe-oj1ew It's the concept itself that's terrifying. The implications of having your DNA public and easily accessible to anyone and everyone is vast. It's not just targeted advertising or discriminatory healthcare pricing. It's everything. Anyone can view everything about you, your very essence that makes you a unique and distinct human being. Imagine the type of mass discrimination that would exist in such a world. You will be judged by your employers, peers and friends alike. Oh you have a mutation that makes YOU have a slightly decreased lung capacity, slightly higher risk for coronary heart disease, a lower neutrophil count or an inhibited ability for your body to release cytokines?
my translation from around 3+ years of watchtime is this: "If I would run in an interview, I'd, I I don't know, I'd tripod.... " I am still not entirely sure, but in the near future you will unerstand how one fghfgfh can mean around 7777things at the same time. He is a truly well-developed indivudual with an astonishing tallent for expressing his idea in a numerous and diverse ways.
@@whirlingfall6876 Yes, little pepe. It is a long journey, however this shouldn't discourage you. I wish you great luck and unforgettable moments while watching thee, my rockie.🧞♂️
that only accounts for healthcare? even in tax funded healthcare countries there is still things like life insurance and mortgage loans where they look into your health and could use this dna to charge you higher premiums or outright refuse you if they find high risks in your dna for bad health
"the government isnt trustable enough, it could get into the wrong hands" ok to solve that, lets just trust the government with our healthcare as well. No way they can mess that up, right? Those politicians are really smart!!!1!1 BatChest
19:37 Um.....getting falsely accused because you brother or sister commited a crime and your DNA looks super similar to theirs? That's cause for concern.
Im sorry but why did chat say the ending of her not wanting to be tracked on google or whatever is irony, she just takes peoples dna that say yes to their dna being used to track them or others for crimes or whatever
@@executioner2020 google search history has been used in the past to incriminate people. Not as sole evidence. Just as DNA evidence is not used as sole evidence.
I think the main concern would be if they start using dna to identify petty crimes. Yes right now it's for specific serious crimes, but over time this could easily expand. This would effect poorer communities more, and there is no reason to trust police with more power, when they already abuse their current power.
Poor people =/= thieves and petty criminals. The vast majority of low income people aren't criminals. Low income communities themselves are by far the most vulnerable to petty crimes.
@@googleminus1442 Petty crime is typically done out of desperation. Typically petty theft is done by people who are poorer. Instead of investing all this money into catching crime after the fact, why don't we spend money to prevent the crime, aka investing in the communities.
@@MrAMP1520 Por que no los dos? I think you're severely overestimating how much it costs to collect and store DNA and underestimating how much time and money it takes to economically develop poor communities, which is a very long term multifaceted effort. Both preventative and corrective action must be done. People can turn to crime when there are few legitimate economic opportunities, creating an environment that is even less conducive for commerce. Nobody in their right minds wants to bring their money, business, or skills to a city like Detroit. It's full of crime and bleeding thousands of residents a year. Again, preventive and enforcement actions must be done in equal measure at the same time, implementing only one or the other will not work.
@@benchoflemons398 nah but them using the database is the illegal part in the first place. If they already use the database they can just arrest the dude, unless ofcourse they use the database illegally in secret
@@TheHockey991 well if they used a legal database its different, but in that case they wouldnt have to play stupid games, they could just go and arrest him with the evidence they found, and make him give his dna you know.
@@ykhenessey3924 wym, did you not watch the video at all? The legal database links them to a fucking great great grandparent. They have 1000 people so they can't just arrest all 1000 and take their DNA, you have to collect it using other means then varify which person matched uo with the crime scene DNA.
I have something called lynch syndrome wich is a dna sequence that gives me high chance of getting cancer, ive alreadt had pre cancer tumbors removed which is plus side and potentially saves my life, the down side is that my life insurance if i choose to get it is now through the roof, i cant join adavnce armed forces such as the air force and other things. the down side is we are turning into a distopian future like movie gattica, people like me are going to get more and more discrimination as we go into the future and coputers get better and faster at reading DNA.
Yo, to be honest, even if some relative of a killer gets discriminated against, I feel like it's still worth it to have their DNA. 'Cause you know, being discriminated against for something like that is terrible, but getting raped and stabbed and brutalized is much worse. Plus, more and more people are just working at places like McDonald's or are self-employed nowadays, anyway. So who cares? McDonald's certainly doesn't. Also, even if you are working for a bigger company, chances are they won't give a fuck so long as it isn't obvious you're related to a killer. And if they start denying people jobs for the reason of them being related to a killer, they're gonna suffer real quick, just like the insurance companies will if they deny people insurance based on hereditary diseases they might develop. Because you gotta remember how bad the unemployment rate is right now. These companies are DESPERATE for new workers.
That one girl: “people say i only got viewers because I was dating a big streamer. But now we broke up so i got a chance to prove it was all me”. She acts as if building an audience isnt the hardest part to being successful on Twitch. Like yeah to some degree she gets credit that she maintained viewers. Obviously they like her or else why continue to watch her now that she broke up with her ex? But literally the hardest part is going from zero viewers to 100. A 100 to 1,000. And 1,000 to 5,000. There are thousands of talented streamers on Twitch who are charismatic, entertaining - and have that star quality. Yet 99.9% of them will fail to ever get over the first hurdle and build that initial audience. She literally skipped that entire process by dating a famous streamer. Im not saying she is bad for this. Like get that money, everyone should jump at any opportunity they get in life so good for her. But she’s being naïve if she doesn’t think her success largely was the result of her ex-boyfriend. It just is what it is. Yeah it’s annoying viewers bring it up, but why engage and try to argue its not. If i was her i would be like “your damn right he did. I won the lottery and now I’m running with it and living my dream.”
Remember when NA chat was laughing about london not being able to catch jack the ripper in the 1800's while this is in 1980's with 12 murders and 50 rapes lmfao
@Omar. FiveEleven Well the only reason they caught him was with DNA way later lmfao. Also im not even from the UK so how am I boosting my ego? I'm from Belgium which has nothing to do with both lmfao
*Chat malding at people not wanting their DNA on a companies database for concerns* Also chat: Spamming Kappa at whatever the company says and not believing anything they say.
Lol chats dumb x was right what privacy do you get from dna? Lol none evidently if your watching the video they already have your dna because you share it with other people its not private at all
What do you mean? It was ironic she was in the business of data collecting on people at such a level as getting their actual DNA, but will protect what she searches online through Duck Duck Go instead of Google.
xqc: "it's CGI, right?"
chat: "that's android camera"
POG Camera zoom
Pogman
If x is gonna get interviewed by anyone other than owl, it better be this guy and his tripod
@Squid Game 🅥?
@Squid Game 🅥 OMG IT'S THE REAL SQUID GAME POGGERS!!!!!
@@FranXiT report both please, these accounts are so cancer
chat acting like you need a phd in biology to understand highschool level science
thats not a "highschool science" my dude, you only learn nucleotides reading not sequence tracking (except translations). it's bachelors biology
@@herculet We did sequence tracking in gifted biology class.
@@herculet Cry about it
Chat hasn’t even graduated middle school
@@herculet i learnt it in high school
29:13 "that was a good video" only listened to about 10% of it probably
classic
Professional reactor LULE
Sigma
as long as he enjoyed himself, that's all that matters xqcL
Yoo
"there are 23 chromosomes in your cells"
someone in chat: i have 22 FeelsDankMan
me, who stole a $0.05 chewing gum back when i was 8: "today is the day im getting arrested and going to max security prison"
This video has some of the funniest X to Chat banter I've seen in a while
idk, especially on this one for me chat seemed especially arr tarded
@@ossyx X matched that level
Nah, it was just pure retardation like normal.
These are the types of videos that I love to watch while eating a meal, very entertaining!
shush
Shh let us enjoy weirdchamp
yea NTR is fun😏
Video: 99% of our DNA is the same for everyone
Chat: We are family
ok?
Literally one person said that 8:40 "We are family Pog" -HECimp
Xqc: What am i?
Chat: "A CLOWN" "A PEPEGA"
chat: retarded
LMAO
The problem with this kind of DNA storing or how it can be used against u (privacy concerns etc.) is for example different types of companies use that information to prey or capitalize and make personalized ads on your addicitons or tendencies towards addictions that are in your DNA. Sooner or later people would sell that kind of information for profit. People could also not give u a job for example because they could see u have a higher chance of getting some kind of disease or that u have some kind of disease. Maybe people would discriminate people with weaker DNAs ( being more prone to disease). Maybe partner matching would change. Because u could just search them and see what kind of disabilities they have but that's if that kind of data would go public.
Talking as if there's ANYTHING you or anyone can do about it. Just sit and complain.
I'm confused what u are trying to say here but if u thikn i was complaining, I think u missunderstood the comment. I was just brain storming what could happen with this kind of technology.
@@rkvoldom9818???
@@rkvoldom9818 bomb tha government.😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😯😎😎
I don't want to alarm you but I think you might have an oxygen deficiency within your brain
did anyone else have this bus come to their elementary school one day and have everyone take dna swabs for whatever reason? i feel like it may be more common than you would think also
nope but I have given finger prints while traveling overseas.
@@GreatRusio Don't worry, law enforcement can already track your wrong doings.
@@ls200076 shit... i think i can hear the fbi coming for that hershey's bar i stole a couple years back
Hopefully they don’t know about the pen I stole back in grade school-
wait someone just rung my doorbell…
xQc: what if we collect and store DNA of newborns to create the national database?
Chat: SPAWNCAMPING WeirdChamp
It's not about people that commit crimes, it's about being related to someone that did, and the possibility that governments can use it to crush dissent.
And the fact people can use it to discriminate is a monkaW.
I'm inclined to believe it, but how would the government use it to crush dissent? Like find DNA from a dissenter and track it to the individual instead of catching the dissenter physically?
@@KOSJ153 because it will enable them to plant evidence like it happens on some countries with other things such as drugs.
@@S85B50Engine They can do that already, idk if that's a legitimate reason to not collect DNA.
I would say the government should not be unconditionally trusted, they do not have your best interests at heart and if you or anyone believes that, then you are delusional of history and even just the current age. There needs to be separation between the government getting everything it needs to control your life or you very easily end up like modern day China or the world described by Orwell's 1984. Man was not made to be cattle and you should not willingly submit to it or worst help facilitate it.
@@KOSJ153 And then there's the fact that for example medical insurance companies could discriminate people because they have a higher chance of getting some medical issue and making their medical insurance rates skyrocket, or employers not hiring "high health risk" people.
Kind of like how the world would become what it is in Gattaca (the 1997 film).
@@S85B50Engine then make it a law that no one can refuse to give someone insurance??? This is what happens when you privatize health care and insurance smh. Either way, the insurance thing is about the best argument so far, everything else is rebuttaled.
"What if someone uploads someone else's DNA and commits a crime to frame them" there would be no DNA of the other person at that scene there would be yours and they would use your relatives to find you there would be no framing as they can build a family tree without DNA so all they would have to do is get a similar DNA hit like one of your cousins, build a family tree based off a common ancestor, eliminate people that don't fit your general description, and your done after they get some of your DNA off a Starbucks coffee cup and match it to the scene of the crime. The only way it would work is if you got someone else's DNA and put it on the crime scene making sure that they had no alibi or were not scene by a witness away from the crimescene. Then maybe uploading DNA would work but I doubt you would get away with it. To make sure the other person doesn't have an alibi would be the difficult part.
Some chick named Emma🚀
True aaaaaaaaaaaand... Yeah, that's pretty true. That's true and- yeah that's true. That's true. That's true- That's pretty true. That's pretty true, I mean-... That's true. Yeah. That's true. Uhm- That's true. That's fuckin' true. Uhm... That's how it is dude
Essay Andy
i think its misphrased- what if you submit your DNA with someone else's name on it? Then your crime would be traced to someone else. Won't do miracles, but will still catch people off guard.
how about we make some clones or test tube babies or fuck it lets just go down the china route and make a new and improved (for better memes) hoomon bean.
Is this a re-upload?
I swear I already watched X's reaction.
oh no, I must have seen it on a clipper channel.
Pepega Clap
Peper pega clab 🤪
pepper pedger collab
Pep edger calp
THE IRONY AT THE END OMEGALUL
This gonna turn into some GATTACA shit right here. I remember watching that movie back in my Bio class in Highschool
5:48 Felix’s brother has entered the chat.
FeelsBadMan
Why do we give killers cool names
Why name him “golden state killer”, that sounds like a awesome name for my PS3 back in the day
Name him “shit eater” or something, then less people will want to do crimes, who like to be called shit eater
Oh yes because people kill others for a cool name
@@TheBestMOC sounds like a personal problem
golden state killer and zodiac killer sound so metal
Because that's where all his crimes occurred the "golden state" is a nickname for California
Why are police officers dna not logged into a government database as part of their sworn duty? GSK would have been caught ages ago
a former police, no wonder he knows what he's doing. he knows how to hide his tracks.
This was my actual debate topic for highschool.. i had to argue against having a dna database of everyone
I mean I dont do crime but I'd rather not having my dna logged just because my brother did 23 and me. It's kind of fucked up.
Just bring up a surveillance state and they will start to stutter
@@Jaybe8891 if you have id of any sort doesn't gov have your dna that way? Curious
Nah, you gotta support it
Wow... back when chat was actually good... this was the best era and we're never getting it back. I miss long brown hair X so much.
I remember going to a police station with summer camp. They took our fingerprints to show us how it works.. i kinda think they kept them xD
You got finessed
Make all police officers put their DNA through this.
When he starts recording the camera too funny
Ok I read your name wrong I thought it said Hitler
@@cesarloya4525
came to say the same thing
What a hell of a chance
@@cesarloya4525 when people ask me how to spell my last name the easiest thing to say it it’s hitler without the t they never forget😩
Just wait untill google wanna use your DNA for even more personalized ads LULW
27:53 they match it to the dna found in the crime scene like what they did with the golden state killer, so the dna has to match.
now if only they can match me with a date.
Well yeah, but you cant be/ hard to be found because "your name" and the fake dna already became 1 individual. Unless you are being tested again or your physical appearance is known in the crime scene.
if you play this half speed at 20:20 it sounds like everyone is a little special :')
huh?
Serial killers from the 70s/80s watching this
Welp time to move to Canada
GAMING GOLEM WARLORD JUICE LORD #2
Its surprising she hasn't gotten sued what she said about the victims problem of not dying being a personal problem. Oh it isnt the perpetrators problem of assaulting someone its the victims problem for not dying so we can help. Its like saying we cant help a student whos been badly beaten by another student because he doesnt have broken bones so its the beaten students problem
chat used to attract me to xqc, now it's just a cesspool of unoriginal spammers. to the point where i watch the videos on my own
Is no one about to mention to fake spider that scared my stoned ass @ 8:47
batchest is just too funny of an emote for some reason
"BATCHEST SO FUNNY" BatChest
27:14 I'm already running to give my DNA!!! so convincing (Omegalul)
OK BUT
hows my privacy is being challenged with my DNA on a screen
that info can be used against you. for advertising, being discriminated against by health insurance when they see that you have a proclivity for certain diseases etc. that information is literally EVERYTHING about you how could it not be a privacy issue??
nothing is just on a screen it is in a databae where it is collected stored and could be sold and used by whoever has it for whatever they want
@@avenoktys3253 I mean, I'm not sure how this is THAT concerning for some people. Like yeah if you are at higher risk premiums can be adjusted, but that means that risk is already there. Not something just conjured out of thin air.
I don't get how targeted advertising is such a horror show to some people. Ok, I get more relevant ads, so what? You're getting them anyways. Now how much and where ads should show up is a different conversation, but if you HAVE to see an ad anyways, wouldn't you rather it be something you're interested in rather than something that's completely irrelevant? It's rare that an ad causes me to buy something but there have been times where targeted advertising shows me something I need, when I need it, and I end up buying it.
@@avenoktys3253 1. Just get adblocker, they're literally free and take 1 sec to download, literally
2. Make it illegal to discriminate people and not give them health insurance someone said why and how it would work in the comments, it was an essay so I'm not typing why it could work
@@JohnDoe-oj1ew It's the concept itself that's terrifying. The implications of having your DNA public and easily accessible to anyone and everyone is vast. It's not just targeted advertising or discriminatory healthcare pricing. It's everything. Anyone can view everything about you, your very essence that makes you a unique and distinct human being. Imagine the type of mass discrimination that would exist in such a world. You will be judged by your employers, peers and friends alike. Oh you have a mutation that makes YOU have a slightly decreased lung capacity, slightly higher risk for coronary heart disease, a lower neutrophil count or an inhibited ability for your body to release cytokines?
23 and me.... Do not give out your dna... The problem is privacy and freedom. The more privacy you give up the more it can be used against you
X a hungarian KEKW our Hussar warlord xqcL
Average blizzard employee 1:06
So I’m indirectly snitching?
Fuq that
ayo my school is in the botom right at 0:43
“50% nose LULW”
3:55 have no idea what he said right here. I started watching XQC recently still getting use to his stutter lol
eghgeghghehh tripod!
@@ivee0_0 lmaoooooo
my translation from around 3+ years of watchtime is this: "If I would run in an interview, I'd, I I don't know, I'd tripod.... " I am still not entirely sure, but in the near future you will unerstand how one fghfgfh can mean around 7777things at the same time. He is a truly well-developed indivudual with an astonishing tallent for expressing his idea in a numerous and diverse ways.
@@dingoto Phenomenal translation, so it's so clear to me now. Thanks, I still have a long way to master the language of XQC
@@whirlingfall6876 Yes, little pepe. It is a long journey, however this shouldn't discourage you. I wish you great luck and unforgettable moments while watching thee, my rockie.🧞♂️
Yes another banger
5:46 NICK!
PARKINSONS = 2 million spam email ads from health care providers
There goes my crime spree plans
23:00 is bc of privatized healthcare, you won't have high rates if there isn't someone charging you extra if your stuff is funded through taxes
Ikr, tax funded health-care is preferred.
that only accounts for healthcare?
even in tax funded healthcare countries there is still things like life insurance and mortgage loans where they look into your health and could use this dna to charge you higher premiums or outright refuse you if they find high risks in your dna for bad health
We could have Hasan-funded healthcare POG
"the government isnt trustable enough, it could get into the wrong hands"
ok to solve that, lets just trust the government with our healthcare as well. No way they can mess that up, right? Those politicians are really smart!!!1!1 BatChest
And now the zodiac killer this stuff is crazy
19:37 Um.....getting falsely accused because you brother or sister commited a crime and your DNA looks super similar to theirs? That's cause for concern.
I always had a hunch that Felix may be part Hungarian bc of his last name
hometown in xqc vid Pog
th legend said that why michal myers want to kill is family lol
Let me guess, it's a 5head farming extravaganza.
More Batchest tbh
monkaW oh shi...
*Translate to English*
monkaW oh shi...
Fucking yt lal
xqc needs to fucking ban chatters who order him to pause the video😂
what if the all the DNA data base gets hacked and manipulated? they probably have physical database as well i guess.
Im sorry but why did chat say the ending of her not wanting to be tracked on google or whatever is irony, she just takes peoples dna that say yes to their dna being used to track them or others for crimes or whatever
google doesnt seem as trustworthy as law enforcement and it can misuse your data,whereas DNA cant be misused .
@@executioner2020 google search history has been used in the past to incriminate people. Not as sole evidence. Just as DNA evidence is not used as sole evidence.
@@johnsonjunior547 yeah
I think the main concern would be if they start using dna to identify petty crimes. Yes right now it's for specific serious crimes, but over time this could easily expand. This would effect poorer communities more, and there is no reason to trust police with more power, when they already abuse their current power.
Agreed plus if other bad actors can get a hold of your DNA information it could be bad news
Poor people =/= thieves and petty criminals. The vast majority of low income people aren't criminals. Low income communities themselves are by far the most vulnerable to petty crimes.
@@googleminus1442 Petty crime is typically done out of desperation. Typically petty theft is done by people who are poorer. Instead of investing all this money into catching crime after the fact, why don't we spend money to prevent the crime, aka investing in the communities.
@@MrAMP1520 Por que no los dos? I think you're severely overestimating how much it costs to collect and store DNA and underestimating how much time and money it takes to economically develop poor communities, which is a very long term multifaceted effort. Both preventative and corrective action must be done. People can turn to crime when there are few legitimate economic opportunities, creating an environment that is even less conducive for commerce. Nobody in their right minds wants to bring their money, business, or skills to a city like Detroit. It's full of crime and bleeding thousands of residents a year. Again, preventive and enforcement actions must be done in equal measure at the same time, implementing only one or the other will not work.
"incest?"
-xQc, October 2021
What if the power goes out in the DNA storage facility where they freeze it and they lose all the data y'know?
13:20 why are they saying gta rp take, police literally do that all the time
@@benchoflemons398 EXACTLY BRO
@@benchoflemons398 nah but them using the database is the illegal part in the first place. If they already use the database they can just arrest the dude, unless ofcourse they use the database illegally in secret
@@ykhenessey3924 Didn't they say the Ged Match database is public? How is it illegal to use?
@@TheHockey991 well if they used a legal database its different, but in that case they wouldnt have to play stupid games, they could just go and arrest him with the evidence they found, and make him give his dna you know.
@@ykhenessey3924 wym, did you not watch the video at all? The legal database links them to a fucking great great grandparent. They have 1000 people so they can't just arrest all 1000 and take their DNA, you have to collect it using other means then varify which person matched uo with the crime scene DNA.
do a 23 and me test
it comes bundled with health and geographic location
its so funny seeing people baffled by shit we learned in grade 9 haha
tf kinda school u go to man
@@bushmaster101 basic biology
The new 3head is just-
so messed up that they are doing that dud
I have something called lynch syndrome wich is a dna sequence that gives me high chance of getting cancer, ive alreadt had pre cancer tumbors removed which is plus side and potentially saves my life, the down side is that my life insurance if i choose to get it is now through the roof, i cant join adavnce armed forces such as the air force and other things. the down side is we are turning into a distopian future like movie gattica, people like me are going to get more and more discrimination as we go into the future and coputers get better and faster at reading DNA.
x has some gigabrain moments and he doesn't even realize it
i wanted to do a ancestery test but than what if somone hacks or aquires it and frames me but i guess i leave dna everywhere
Weird that they put rape above serious assault . Also bio engineering would be a concern for the government taking everyone’s dna .
Great video
Ahhh yes some Intresting vids
No tripod Andy
He’s GUILTY
yeah man
and 100% reason to remember you're lame 9:57 lol
Where does the Family name Holes come from?
dna database
SUS MR.COW
I’m scared
12:21 i cringed at this dono cuz im hungarian too Pepepains
érzem a fájdalmad testvér
@@collen3594 legalabb chat nem annyira törődött lol
Yo, to be honest, even if some relative of a killer gets discriminated against, I feel like it's still worth it to have their DNA. 'Cause you know, being discriminated against for something like that is terrible, but getting raped and stabbed and brutalized is much worse. Plus, more and more people are just working at places like McDonald's or are self-employed nowadays, anyway. So who cares? McDonald's certainly doesn't. Also, even if you are working for a bigger company, chances are they won't give a fuck so long as it isn't obvious you're related to a killer. And if they start denying people jobs for the reason of them being related to a killer, they're gonna suffer real quick, just like the insurance companies will if they deny people insurance based on hereditary diseases they might develop. Because you gotta remember how bad the unemployment rate is right now. These companies are DESPERATE for new workers.
Lmaoo he put plates on their back and killed them if it made noise..thats some squid game type of shit
wowzers!
A brutal serial murderer is just like that show i watched!
That one girl: “people say i only got viewers because I was dating a big streamer. But now we broke up so i got a chance to prove it was all me”.
She acts as if building an audience isnt the hardest part to being successful on Twitch. Like yeah to some degree she gets credit that she maintained viewers. Obviously they like her or else why continue to watch her now that she broke up with her ex?
But literally the hardest part is going from zero viewers to 100. A 100 to 1,000. And 1,000 to 5,000. There are thousands of talented streamers on Twitch who are charismatic, entertaining - and have that star quality. Yet 99.9% of them will fail to ever get over the first hurdle and build that initial audience.
She literally skipped that entire process by dating a famous streamer. Im not saying she is bad for this. Like get that money, everyone should jump at any opportunity they get in life so good for her.
But she’s being naïve if she doesn’t think her success largely was the result of her ex-boyfriend. It just is what it is. Yeah it’s annoying viewers bring it up, but why engage and try to argue its not.
If i was her i would be like “your damn right he did. I won the lottery and now I’m running with it and living my dream.”
wrong video bro
man comparing this to chat now, not much changed. They where a lost cause to begin with
Bro you made 8mill from twitch wtffff🤧
HackerMan
*Translate to English*
Hackerman
@@r1Scooby no
@@levissilly7069 :| fungi
Really gotta stop giving these murders and rapists titles, I think that gives them a weird boost to keep going
3:28 BatChest TTours A NANOGRAM?
Never mind chat started spamming that after I commented this
Remember when NA chat was laughing about london not being able to catch jack the ripper in the 1800's while this is in 1980's with 12 murders and 50 rapes lmfao
Ah yes, Just find DNA when none was there 4Head, and if there is DNA just make sure to use DNA technology that hasn't been invented. EZ Clap.
@@oof6205 there was DNA left behind tho. Still tho its way easier to catch someone in 1980's then 1800's. NA OMEGALUL
@Omar. FiveEleven Well the only reason they caught him was with DNA way later lmfao. Also im not even from the UK so how am I boosting my ego? I'm from Belgium which has nothing to do with both lmfao
what a freedom world😏
*Chat malding at people not wanting their DNA on a companies database for concerns*
Also chat: Spamming Kappa at whatever the company says and not believing anything they say.
what do you think theyre gonna do with your DNA 4head? you really think they care about you that much? your parents don't even care about you lul
Tbh I don’t think taking dna from new borns and cataloging it is a very good idea. The pros out-weight cons.
Can you please do the test
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Lol chats dumb x was right what privacy do you get from dna? Lol none evidently if your watching the video they already have your dna because you share it with other people its not private at all
13:04
why is the dude asking the woman about duckduckgo? that shit is just plain weird
What do you mean? It was ironic she was in the business of data collecting on people at such a level as getting their actual DNA, but will protect what she searches online through Duck Duck Go instead of Google.