Doctor Who Season 14 Episode 3 is Vindictive and Juvenile GARBAGE!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 май 2024
- Doctor Who Season 14 Episode 3 is Vindictive and Juvenile GARBAGE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SHOUTOUT TO MEMBERS:
- AloneTogether85
- Dippy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey! and Thanks for stopping by to watch my stuff!
If you want to support the channel further, take a look at my Membership for £0.99!
/ @joetheubergeek
If you like what you see here. please consider subscribing to not just my RUclips page but also Rumble as well.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL MEDIA:
I say a lot of things on here, some of them good...
/ joetheubergeek
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow Instagram for normal, wholesome things.
Instagram (suited for everyone): / theubergeekofficial
Thank you for taking the time to watch my video,
PEACE! 
Развлечения
Is it just me, but Russel T Davis said he doesn’t want Davros in a wheelchair because he’s a bad guy he doesn’t want to represent wheelchair uses as bad guys. He’s not in a wheelchair!! It’s the bottom part of a Darlick!. With that argument, then give Darlicks legs. Then they can go upstairs and take over the world 😅😅
Maybe, a conventional Review would explain your opinion better than ony to state that wokeness and political bias destroyed this episode, too.
This version of Nurse What seems to be the untold, experimental gap year of The Doctor.
It's possible to come back from an experimental gap year. This so far looks a lot more destructive.
While I would agree RTD has been coming off like an older man trying to be hip by making things inclusive that isn't a bad thing. What's been bad in my opinion was showing he doesn't fully understand certain concepts or social attitudes. Like taking Davros out of his chair to not subliminally message that those who can't walk are bad (a real stretch for me I thought the chair was cool) or conflating being nonbinary with being trans as he did with Donna's daughter Rose, who clearly is a binary embracing trans girl. But that's not what you're complaining about. Even so, he's trying and that is good, as we all should try to be more accepting and respectful of others, it's what I think the Doctor is all about. So I will say this:
3:34 Faith is complete trust or confidence in something that isn't always a good thing. Blind faith can even be dangerous. Like stepping on a land mine it could cause certain death.
3:42 You're personally fortunate for no pro-"alphabet" stuff? Acknowledging others exist isn't even a stance it's just a fact. Bad take, Joe.
4:28 It isn't anti-religious it's anti-virtue signaling/disguised apathy.
5:02 Capitalism isn't the only thing keeping this show going, the people do, being critical of and playing with the ideas of a system that many have no choice but to engage in is how art works and how we continue to progress societies by thinking about its permutations.
5:33 For someone coming off as both angry and condescending I can't help but think you match this description.
5:37 Especially when you follow it up with this. Come on, Joe. Distasteful.
6:21 You had it just to let go of it. Death defines us because it's a part of life and without it we would never be alive. Death has everything to do with life.
6:55 Elon Musk take. Yowza.
8:07 The decision to tell us this gives the opposite impression.
Anyway, stay triggered, king. Enjoy your safe space.
What a weird response. You're critiquing the correctness of woke activism in a show that can't survive without a mass appeal. Audiences don't want it; viewing figures will continue falling, there will be no mass merchandising, and when the 2 contracted seasons are done on Disney+ the show will be cancelled.
@@rallan1953you sound so confident about this fact, when we still don’t have complete information, 1. There still is an audience, 2. The overnight rating is only the bbc broadcast which happens many hours after the episode releases online, people don’t want to wait. While this doesn’t prove the show will not get cancelled, it’s also doesn’t show that it will. So just shut up about things you don’t know about.
Oh what a beautiful take! Couldn’t have done it better.
Sound a bit salty there, but okay I don't know much. 🤷♂️
To have faith is to trust. Saying you have faith in somebody is saying you trust them. So how is it bad to blindly follow a God who provides morality, hope and purpose to a lot of people. But no you'll just prefer a world without absolutes, where anything is permissable. Murder, SA, grooming and no one will ever be punished because there's nothing once it's gone.
It is anti-religious, what are you on. RTD is a homo who blames everything wrong in his life on religion.
No, I don't want the alphabet mob in anything. It's not healthy for a society.
There was nothing wrong with capitalism, it's just brain dead pretentious modern think tanks and the idiot fools who follow them who hate it because there lazy.
How is it distasteful to criticise the pro Palestine lot for literally doing nothing but supporting a terrorist state, that murders people like themselves. Only because they were told about how oppressed they are by every major news channel. Good Palestine shouldn't exist it is an evil state, full of evil people.
Wow every one dies how deep and thought provoking.
@@matrick2227 Well, we have the consolidated figures now, and it's the lowest figures in the show's history, just like everyone has been saying. Jodi averaged about 2 million more views than the show has now.
At this point, it's less popular than when it was canceled the first time, and when Disney's contract runs out, the show will very likely be canned (and quite possibly sold to Disney outright, which might be the whole reason they got involved in the first place).
The white men that died in episode 3 were given good deaths and were presented as good people . In fact the hero at the end was the father of the girl . They were presented as brave people so I do not think that Moffat was completely hating religious people. To be honest I think you were very bias against this episode based on what came before . As a stand alone episode it was a big improvement when compared to the other two .
First off, Secularism is a Religion, Moffet is Religious, and Secondly, the Idea that "Religious People" use Faith so Don't Need proof or Evidence and are irrational is just Nonsensical and Hateful. Especially since the Oh So Rational Atheists in Todays Anti- Christian Movement continually Prove Themselves to be Childish Incompetents.
@@skwills1629 Moffat has never grasped basic religious concepts, such as faith. It's probably his weakest aspect as a writer, beyond his constant reuse of material. It ruined his Dracula miniseries a few years back as well. He's too angry to write about religion in anything but the whiniest Reddit Atheist tone, and he's getting worse with it as he gets older. He at least let the Doctor be respectful back in the Matt Smith era, now he can't even manage politeness.
@@berserkasaurusrex4233 - The Issue mainly is He has His Own Religion, Secularism, and He Gets All of what He Knows of Religion as a Topic from Atheist Sources, Who Also Push Militant Atheist Views, and Who Mainly Write Polemic. The Internet is Rife with This Sort of Atheist Who Insists We Pretend Their Decrees of God being Imaginary and Religion is all a Lie and We Must Push Liberal Secular Values must be Understood as a mere lack of Beleif in a god so it doesn't have a Burden Of Proof and cannot be Critiissed. But Honestly, The Whole Modern Atheist Rhetoric is a Trap for The Mind, Which Bills Itself as All About Rationality and Reason, so that its Adherents See it as Making Them Like Vulcans from Star Trek, Purely Logical and Rational, when in Reality is Relies on Childish Mockery and Insults, Which does Impact How They Think on Every Oher Topic. Doctor Who Today is Childish in a Bad Way, as if it is Literally Written By a Child. The Reductionism of Capitalism and Religion, and Overreliance on Catch Phrase Thinking, and Complaints that in The Real World don't Actually Accomplish Anything such as "Saying Thoughts And prayers is Bad" as if People Saying that are a Major Problem causing Harm, Really Undermines Their We are the Logical and Rational Ones. Does Anyone Who is Not a Far Left Wing Militant Atheist Shill Actually Believe These People could Solve Complex Social Issues?
In the same Way Moffet and His Cohorts Reduce and Caricaturise Christianity to Make it Easier to Show as Ridiculous and Stuopide, They Present Capitalism, The Pro Life Message, and Any Other Issue. They Reduce it Down and Twist it into a Caricature that They can Then Ridicule. The Worst of it is, They Offer Nothing After the Ridicule. The Whole Mentality is, After The Stupide Bad Thing is Gone, We Won't have Problems because Stupide Bad Thing causes the Problem, when in Real Life You can't just Get Rid of Stupide Bad Thing, You have to Do Something in its Place that Serves the same Function and Deal with the Issues Stupide Bad Thing Dealt with. Religion is Not simply Some Stories People believe are True that Causes Them to be Stupide and do Bad Things, it addresses the way Reality is Understood and How One Leads Ones Life, and the Shallow Secular Humanism They Push, which to be Fair is Not even the best Reflection of Humanist Thought, it too is Reduced, Albeit not Caricaturised or Ridiculed, Simply doesn't Work since it is itself Reduced to " I am Allowed to Have Sex with Everyone, have No Consequences for My Actions, can Live as Selfish as I want, and do as I Please with No One being Allowed to Critiise Me, They Must Cheer Me On, as I Want to Fulfill All My Hedonistic Desires, and Government Pays All My Bills", which simply is Not a Realistic Outlook.
@@skwills1629 With all those capital letters, are you an AI?
I mean, some of what you say is true, a lot of it is nonsense, but so many capitals just raises the question of what you are.
@@troffle - You Atheists Love to Ridicule My Disability. Which is How I Know You are an Atheist. After All, No One Else Attacks Me over supposed Random Capitals and Atheists have for the Last Five Years. It Really Proves You Can't Be Good Without God and Atheist Lack Empathy.
Although not an admirer of contemporary Who - it gets to a stage where people are actively looking at stuff to pick at. This seems to be that precise moment as this is about the first thing I've seen since the 2010s that felt like a DW episode is actually supposed to - certain brief moments of the 60ths notwithstanding. Not the highest bar to aim for as it's called DW and this should be the minimum expectation but it is at least a start.
For such a “woke” series and episode. It is refreshing to see that this episode champions, the power of parents and more importantly emphasizes the absolute importance and focus on fathers!
I thought that honestly! and the positives of religion at the end. and I'm p leftwing ngl😂
And also that "People die, get over it"
Antiwar and anticapitalism topics were obvious in this episode. But when they brought "faith is bad" thingy out of nowhere, i laughed so hard xD
I don't get why RTD getting someone's pronouns wrong and then correcting himself makes him a hypocrite or is a bad thing? Also the speech the Doctor gives in The Rings of Akhaten isn't written by Moffat.
The point about the "Thoughts and Prayers" thing is that it's a trite phrase that people use after a terrorist attack or mass shooting, like a virtue signal that people use online before they go about their day.
2) Matt Smith's Doctor was disrespectful at one point to the cleric soldiers in A Time of Angels, and the Bishop got one back at him. Moffat showed the Doctor as quite bigoted at times during his time as showrunner to show that the Doctor is not always right. In this story his prejudices come out under stress, and he tries to track them back at the end of the episode.
3) Moffat said the "dying defines us" line years ago. He's not wrong. The whole of art and religion would be different if no-one died. Dark Water was a thinly veiled attack on the Transhumanist movement and their attempt to abolish death. The way that it's expressed in this episode is clunky, I'll give you that.
After two-thousand-plus-years, about the only prejudices of his we've seen are against Daleks and even that got toned down when he had his own pet Dalek. Moffat does not write stories well. People who think so have just fallen for the fake Moffat image, just like other people fall for the Musk image.
@@troffle The Doctor has anti-military attitudes going all the way back to Pertwee and argued with the Brigadier all the time. This is tempered by the fact that he finds them useful sometimes. During the Tennant and Capaldi era, this was sometimes over-done I'll grant you. The Doctor's position on faith is less clear, but he's usually presented as a ardent rationalist who only believes in what we call the supernatural when he has a solid explanation for it.
@@baybarsedturner2 Of course, the anti-military attitudes, fully aware of that.
I'm just pointing out the number of times he wasn't a pacifist, is what I'm saying. Don't go shifting the goalposts.
The position on "faith" is that pretty much the only time he's ever needed it, HAVING MET A BUNCH OF GODS, was that time it was used as a trigger for a psychic barrier in "The Curse Of Fenric" and he very strongly differentiated "faith" and "religion", as the Soviet captain, Ace and the Doctor themselves demonstrated.
Also, go back to "The Face Of Evil" for what he thought of some theologists.
Thoughts And Prayers is Not a Trite Phrase. And There is No Reason to Think Those Who say it just Say it to Virtue Signal then go about Their Day. The Only Reason it is an Issue with Lefteests is Because They Hate the Idea of the prayer Part. It is a Condolence Meant to Be Understood as a Condolence. A Consolation. Attacking it just to Push Atheistic Secular Humanist Gibberish is Bygoted.
@@baybarsedturner2 I mean, it's directly stated in the 7th Doctor era that faith is a real, tangible force, it's actually a plot point he has to work around with Ace. And during both the original run and the RTD era, and even this very season, the Doctor has met literal gods.
It's a bit weird that he's suddenly acting like it's all nonsense, given all that. Moffat keeps writing the Doctor with his own prejudices, though he was better at keeping that in check a decade ago.
The Doctor states towards the end of the episode that he needs faith too, I don't think the episode is supposed to be an attack on organised religion, but maybe about blindly following without thinking, as none of the soldiers stopped to think about their enemy. The story's in the future, "capitalism" is the driving force behind the war in the episode, and it sounded like a critique of Boeing or Lockheed Martin more than everyday life.
The quote at 6:00, tbh could slot into many of Moffats prior scripts and it would feel natural. Seems like a Doctory thing to say, especially as Ruby did just die in front of him.
The Dad is a strong character who supports his daughter and, in the end, saves the day. Not very "white male" hating. That isn't me saying that never happens in the modern show, but that this was an exception imo. To me, 14, later 15 and Ruby, have been an improvement on 13s era so far. Yes, there's been some OTT moments but the quality of the show has gone up. Welcome to disagree, just my two pence :)
This episode really doesn't make a difference between faith and religion. The classic episode "The Curse Of Fenric" does, does it well, and doesn't make fun of either. But this episode? Big nope.
Also, Moffat's incompetent. If he wanted to push the "capitalism", he would've had an enemy the soldiers could shoot at to sell more ammunition (by having the mines and ambulances project holograms of enemies?), made the mines not-recyclable to sell more mines, not kill wounded soldiers to they could be sold medicines and treatments, to keep fighting, to keep using more ammunition.
You need drama, Vater's blindness needed him to die? Stupid. Just have his service to the military extended, have his credit line dropped even further, making him work harder to support his child.
Why should I care if Ruby dies? The Doctor can just breathe on her and bring her back to life. Why should I care that Vater died, his daughter didn't.
How organised is this religion? I didn't see the Ordained Anglican Marines pray to God much.
Is this episode "woke" or not? I don't even care. "None of the soldiers stopped to think about their enemy"? THE WRITER OF THE EPISODE didn't stop to think about the episode, and now the claim is he drafted this episode TWO YEARS AGO? He's incompetent and the episode is an absolute mess, that's a much bigger problem.
The quality of the show has gone down, in the one part that would be the cheapest and easiest to fix. I don't know what's worse, that the show is so irretrievably bad, or that people praise this garbage. It needs to be shut down. This horror needs to be stopped.
I'm just watching the videos made by the brave people risking their sanity with this turd now. The Nurse What Show doesn't deserve anyone's time or attention, I think the narcissists who make it will never learn that alienating the fans of a franchise is a very bad thing.
Who are literally spending your time to watch a video about this show while declaring it’s not worth anybody’s time. Clearly it is worth some of your time.
Comparatively this was a fantastic episode compared to the bloody stupid space babies and the trans episode with no actual Beatles to be seen. Surely you can't hate the show this much or be this miserable? In 2024 this is a great episode.
"Comparatively" and "In 2024 this is a great episode" are not really the ringing endorsements you might think.
@@troffle Joe literally said he would enjoy a mid episode right now. Considering this episode was better then mid, he really should have enjoyed it.
@@The_BIaze Look, it's difficult for me to respond to this. I haven't watched the episode yet, but I've liked a grand total of one Moffat episode, buried by how much I hate his other thieveries.
Maybe I'll let you know when I've seen it, but I'm not prepared to believe yet that this episode wasn't as bad as the rest of his work, or the last few years of episodes.
@@The_BIaze I've watched it. Moffat trying to set up a capitalism-driven war, he utterly failed.
There should've been accounts running for healing blindness, not terminating the soldier. The mines shouldn't have been reusable. There should have been even a HOLOGRAMMATIC visible enemy so there was something to shoot at, so they would be forced to buy more armaments. The script is incompetent. Its writer is a complete and utter incompetent who ought to be jailed.
This episode wasn't mid, it was as bad as the nappy load in the "Space Babies" garbage episode.
@@troffle It seems like you didn’t even understand the episode.
They didn’t cure Jon Vaters blindness because it was cheaper to just exterminate him and use his death make the soldiers believe there is something deadly out there, which would cause them to by more.
The mines wouldn’t have been reusable if the soldiers bought them. However these mines weren’t theirs. These mines where placed there by the system. Obviously the system would use mines that are reusable because it wouldn’t benefit of mines that just go boom once. This makes perfect sense.
Holograms cost money. The system want to make money. It’s easy to just have the soldiers die. They don’t need to see something. And they thought they needed to by more because people kept dying. There had to be something out there that was killing them. And there was.
And this is totally Moffats thing. He has written multiple episodes that criticize Capitalism. And episodes like this have existed before.
It’s not the episodes fault of you didn’t understand it.
'your world' and my world are completely different, yet as a writer also I'm not allowed to publish my world, strange that...
It shows you didn’t watch it because at the end The Doctor Clarifies why faith is absolutely necessary. But hey, continue just watching clips.
I’m glad a statement at the end corrects all the changes in the character for half a century. If you can’t understand that then there is no hope for you.
It’s not about sexual orientation to everyone. this character is not the character we grew up with if you had a character that you loved and grew up with that was completely changed like doctor who has . I would feel that you would feel the exact same frustration.
Well that's even worse. Thanks for dumping all over everybody who doesn't find faith to be absolutely necessary. But hey, continue just believing that everybody who isn't you is wrong.
@@Peaceforall20111 bruh, go to any review. This episode and the doctor here are being heavily compared to 12.
@@troffle you didn't watch the episode did you?
Doctor doesn't like blind faith in superior power that makes you blind in your own actions and stops you from questioning. Similar to having faith in a company.
Whereas he needs faith that gives hope like believing that your loved ones are always with you.
They are not the same thing
@@Knighttt662 > you didn't watch the episode did you?
No, not yet. I've said so elsewhere.
> Similar to having faith in a company.
It's funny you said that. In the 1980s episode "The Curse Of Fenric", faith is used as a defence against the Haemovores. It's what saves the army captain thanks to his belief in the Soviet, Ace in her belief of among other things her mother, and the Doctor's faith in his companions.
But all I said was that faith isn't necessarily necessary. I don't have faith in a company. I don't have faith even in humanity. There are lots of people who don't have faith.
Please don't attack me for things I'm not saying. I don't have any faith you're going to be good about this.
The doctor had his own opinions of capitalism why hate now!?
"Sensitive nature" Cries about the episode . Lol
Really goes to show he the real hypocrite really is.
@@The_BIaze Maybe the ones who cry about literally everything and demand things they don't like be changed or banned in order to benefit themselves, who then turn around and call others crybabies when someone complains about them?
Message to RTD: NO, sorry... we're not all embracing your world at all. Indeed... most people aren't.
Oh you are really showing him, right? I bet RTD is now crying in his bed because user-un9go4qe5i send him a message.
@@The_BIaze I suspect you're right.
Steven Moffat is the only decent sci-fi showrunner on the show. RTD and Chris Chibnall are very good drama writers, but sci-fi really isn't their genre. Even Moffat's era went downhill after the 50th, which was a real shame as I thought Peter Capaldi was a very good interpretation of the Doctor. I have given up on this show twice, firstly after the Timeless Child which I was angry about, and again after the Christmas episode and the specials, because I just don't get any enjoyment out of watching anymore. I think it's just not my era and probably not aimed at traditional sci-fi fans like me anymore. Should I be tempted to give them a third chance and watch the Moffat episode? Opinion seems to be mixed here, on whether it is worth it.
Gonna disagree. Moffat was not a decent showrunner, not a good writer, manage to bang out maybe one or two decent episodes but even then they weren't too well thought out.
The 50th was an atrocity. I will never forgive "What are the round things in the walls?" "No idea". I want Moffat ended forever, as one of the worst influences on "Doctor Who" ever.
It must be hard going through life hating everything.
He’s just trying to grift and make some views/money off of the Doctor Who Hate Train that the fandom menace types creat. It’s quite pathetic for them honestly
No, with the quality of episodes and sub-humans like Moffat, Davies and Chibnall, The Rings Of Power, Star Trek since 2009, AppleTV's "Foundation", Villeneuve's "Dune", commenters just like you, it's really QUITE EASY. They make it SO EASY FOR YOU.
@@troffle it’s ok. Uber Geek will spoon you now😂😂
@@troffle "sub-humans" Jesus man, it's a tv show. WTF is wrong with you?
Why is this the go-to response with you guys?
Did it Neil Cross write Rings of Akhaten, not Steven Moffat?
I'm a Christian, and yet one of my all-time favourite Doctor Who stories is the two part Impossible Planet/Satan Pit. Criminally underrated, that was a terrific story of good triumphing over evil with some genuinely challenging and provocative dialogue and themes.
The writers of Nurse What clearly forgot at one point the Doctor HAD morals, values and *FAITH* "if I believe in one thing, I believe in her (Rose Tyler)" which is what made the character fantastic! But we know this isn't Doctor Who any more anyway.
"You're a Christian, and yet one of your all-time favourite Doctor Who stories is a piece with an explicit reference to Satan being defeated by the Doctor". "And yet" is not something that really fits in that sentence.
Watch the episode! In the end the doctor literally admits that he needs faith himself.
Joey boy here just doesn’t mention that because it doesn’t fit his bullshit take.
@@The_BIaze ... telling me to watch the episode for that reason is going to put me off.
1) The 7th Doctor episode "The Curse Of Fenric" did it much, much, much, much better.
2) Faith is occasionally useful but often is based on nothing and leads to ruin. More often than not, it's based on beliefs that have no basis of reality.
So telling me that I should watch this episode because the Doctor "literally admits that he needs faith himself" is going to be FUNDAMENTALLY worse and more offensive than telling me that in the last episode the Doctor saved the world and fixed the broken history between 1925 and 1963 with a musical dance number... and not by going back to 1925.
I started disliking the show when Bill came along. Did I care that she was a lesbian? No. Did she need to remind us every single episode? Also no. If you want the inclusivity, then slip it in subtly. Make it part of the background. Make it seem like a part of every day life as normal. There is no need to shove it, and any other views held by RTD, down our throats at every opportunity. The writing, acting, and overall execution has been declining for years. Focus more on a good story with good characters instead of pushing an agenda.
Statistically Bill was one of the new who companions that made the least fuss about their sexuality.
Comparisons like Rose or Amy had way more times in which their sexuality was shown when compared to Bill.
@The_BIaze Yeah, they were shown more than spoken about. Amy and Rory's relationship being referred to so much was also annoying. I loved Donna because they made a running gag of it. To me, it's more a matter of "show, don't tell".
@@FantomoDrako Bull had her moments when her sexuality was shown. One episode literally starts with her on a date with a woman.
@@The_BIaze Yeah, and I had no problem with it. What annoyed me was that the script called for her to mention her sexuality at least once every episode and I found that needless and excessive is all.
I guess you have selective hearing. I was also put off by the doctor's faith rant - but he literally explains by the end of the episode that his feelings on the matter are conplex. "Doesn't mean I don't need it." We should be praising Moffat for giving a character conflicted feelings on something, rather than having the character have the right or wrong opinion
Look, I hate woke stuff. I truly do but a lot of you anti-Who youtubers are simply rage baiting. There was nothing 'woke' in this episode. Yes, the doctor critises the arms/war industry. How is that 'woke'? What's woke about hating people who make a living off of war? If you need to consider such a thing woke, you need to re-evaluate and get your mind out of the culture war mindset for a second.
"Doesn't mean I don't need it" is a f*cking cop out.
It's a way of trying to save their ass, so they don't get accused of anti religious vulgarity.
The venom Ncuti used in those scenes was genuine, it matches the venom he oozes when the cameras aren't rolling.
If freemason hack, Mofatt want's to tackle religion maybe he could have had them be jewish soldiers and write about wars for israel?
@@JoeTheUberGeek So, if the show is woke you hate it but if it's nuanced you hate it? Got it.
Get your mind out of the culture war mindset when this episode was about nothing other than perpetuating the culture wars? Talk to Moffat.
> his feelings on the matter are conplex
After two-thousand years and having a beyond-genius inhuman intelligence, he has "conflicted feelings" on something?
Sorry, I'm against DEI and the direction of RTD Doctor Who, but 'Boom!' was the best Doctor Who since Capaldi. I'm sure it's an anomaly, and I don't have any hope for the future of Disney Doctor Who, but credit where credit is due, it was a good story. The bar is set low, though.
There are balrogs looking down surprised to see the bar beneath them.
It was a wonderful episode. Nice to see the Doctor wise-cracking while being serious. An angry, uncompromising Doctor at times.
This is a Doctor who two episodes ago had to be reminded by a nanny to not say the word "sh_t". This is not a good wise-cracking Doctor.
No decent, balanced, sane, non-woke, non-virtue signalling, box-ticking, 'genuine' Dr Who fan watches this load of 💩💩💩💩
Hello there, I do.
I do, buzzword man
Oops sorry, me too.
Nah i kinda loved this episode
It helped that the two before it were so appalling.
Yeah, this guy doesn't understand the point this episode is trying to make. On his twitter he said this episode is about white people being bad???
Stalking much...
@@JoeTheUberGeek ?
@@RobbieMartin745 The person I commented to, deleted their comment.
I miss the old school Doctor. The stories sucks and are so self-righteous.
Wish I was back in past 30 years ago
@@OmanRather so right back into the wilderness era? I doubt that.
@@The_BIaze common sense times not insane woke times we are living in now
@@OmanRather According from the way you are using the word woke, you clearly don’t know what it means.
@@The_BIaze mmmm yes political correctness on steroids
Doctor Who used to be a show about bringing the audience together. It created UNITY. Like a sporting grand final or the Olympics or a Telethon. Judging by all your comments, do you see what the show's done now? It's created nothing but fighting, anger and hate, and everyone has a different opinion it. Whether you love it or hate the show, we have everyone hating each other because of their beliefs. Instead of bringing everyone together, the show's just driven everyone apart and just got EVERYONE offside politically. Why watch it if you're just going to get riled up and start hating either, the show or other people for their beliefs? It's not in a healthy state right now, and won't get healthier unless the show's appealing to society as a whole, instead of over-emphasizing sections of it. They should put it back on free to air and work on making it a national institution for the common good of all, instead of just, me, me, me. We should all try and see the bigger picture, and if the show's only going to bring up anger and hate, then that's not healthy for you, me or anybody, so just walk away.
The problem is I don't believe it was the show that did this, it was a bunch of grifters on the Internet chasing cheap clicks
That's what demoralization does to people, and is the primary goal of Critical Theory which is the driving force of the modern SJW/DEI/WOKE, etc. nonsense. Divide and conquer, essentially.
Now we all know doctors is not as good as used to be does it mean you could call it down?
Russell T gives everything away in the first sentence "My World" "My World" .... He is determined that we accept his world as our world...and he will bombard us with his messaging until we learn to like it.
He's a selfish bigot.
@@LauraGS564 That seems like an inconsistent comment. Wasn't that a Moffat writing?
@@troffle Seemingly Moffat is also a bigot if you believe the pure stupidity this video is trying to sell you.
Yes, in fact you shouldn’t be disrespect to people, wether they are straight, gay or bi. And some people definitely should need to learn this message.
@@The_BIaze If some people behave disrespectfully, shouldn't they be disrespected?
... and I don't mean because they're straight, gay or bi, I mean because of the way they behave and treat other people.
To RTD, no it is "NOT THE WORLD" might be yours but it is not the normal, real world.
wow, you must really hate that the last image was that of a snowflake, can't help but think there is a message in that.
Yeah- Would have been better title, “Mine over Matter” if they had a more straightforward screenplay. 😂
I aint a fan of all this woke bullshit and quite sick of it especislly with the devils chord but come on that episode was one of the best we have had in 5 years. To say its vindicitive garbage is just pure anger blinding you. It wasnt perfect but it was definitely good and a huge step up from all the other 60th garbage
to satisfy the fans maybe they can be bring the eigth doctor back
Remember that moment in Blink when the doctor explained that the angels were like corporations, stealing our time and setting us back a few decades? Yeah, me either.
It’s entirely possible to have good stories that aren’t messages.
Oh geez, grow up kid.
Yeah, grow up and cry about real things on the internet, like how video game butts are literally killing women. 😂
FAITH is a BELIEF in something without proof.
It is unscientific & unrealistic.
HOPE is a different thing entirely.
We can hope for many things:
That there is a god who cares about us, that humans will learn to be accepting of a kind & inclusive culture in the future, but we have NO WAY OF KNOWING.
Therefore, we can HOPE for it, but to have FAITH in anything without proof, is completely without foundation, and something anyone with a scientific mindset would not be likely to have.
WE HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING.
God exists. Get over it.
@@JoeTheUberGeeklol. U funny.
@@JoeTheUberGeekProve it then, you haven’t convinced me with that.
When you include things that are incompatible, you wont have a culture left in the future.
If you include things that are mutually incompatible, you wont have a culture in the future.
CHIBNALL KILLED THE SHOW, NOW RUSSELL T DAVIS AS BURRIED THE SHOW R I P WHO
Yes, but don't forget Moffat was abusing it in a hidden back room before Chibnall.
Not even Davies seems to be able to keep his story straight when talking about the characters for this disturbing program he has produced
Turn on the light
u don’t even care to have a non political-oriented opinion. the faith aspect of the episode is literally explained, it’s not just ‘faith and religion bad’. the doctor explains that it blinds you from making your own decisions, just like the blind war they are mindlessly fighting. there are many cool themes going on in this episode, that are expanded on
in this episode, the religious aspect actually affects the outcome of others, whereas before it was not as relevant to the straight up death of the doctor and his companion etc. so the doctor decides to use his words and reflect what he needed to, to save the day
it was also turned back on the doctor later on, that he hasn’t actually given up on faith and that it’s just not the best feeling to apply to different situations
Does it tho? That's very small minded. People will faith do think. In fact you have to mull over whether you believe or not in the first place. And why you even want to.
@@stevencrighton6890 just listen and don’t have ur own consensus, i can’t tell if ur left or right wing but you have to be very one sided to say smn like that lol. what happened to ppl having their own take, which i’m trying to have discourse on. add to the convo
@@steveandjeanniefrith236 u r def right actually, i think in that sense the episode is about the doctor not instantly thinking all faith is blind n that everyone has reasons for having some
I hate the "it's current year" arguments.
Just confused why he slowly turned white for a couple of seconds right before going immediately back to black, still the best episode so far though, not saying it's good though
That was the landmine charging his body up, preparing it to explode. Though I can't explain why he was able to reverse it
@@DeLegend27 I know right rofl
@@lRlMlGl Though the 10th doctor was able to expel radiation out his foot into his shoe, and also detox his body from poison with peanuts and a kiss. So its not that far of a stretch to suggest that he has the ability to hold back and even reverse the energy that was preparing his body to explode.
Bro literally had to figure out this shit rofl
@@lRlMlGl huh?
8:23 Nurse What has no right to reference Matt Smith in that way when he’s disrespected the fans so much.
You gotta be kidding, in the musical episode he was referencing the First Doctor and Totter's Lane. This show simply has no right to exist.
@@troffle be thankfull he never mentioned about the hand of omega thats why they was on earth to begin with as the og doctor played by the late william hartnell at the time never mind he crossed his own time stream which is illegal by gallifrey law but gallfreys gone so f the law.
@@robertharrison1058 Even played by William Hartnell, he crossed his own timestream by the work of the Time Lords.
There's really only one paragraph in the novelisation of "Remembrance Of The Daleks" that says the First Doctor brought the Hand to Earth.
Well okay, and that scene in Lungbarrow but you're digging into serious deep lore if you're bringing up Lungbarrow. Lungbarrow includes the idea that the Time Lords are sterile and use Looms to reproduce, so...
Seeing as they've ignored virtually everything from the books between the two series...
... well, one hopes they don't reference it. Seeing as we know from its burial in 1963 it's supposed to stay untouched until 1989... oh what the hell, they've messed up virtually every other part of the continuity.
@troffle one time was extreme emergency due to omega himself draining the universe of all energy then there was the high president of gallifrey wanting eternal life of rasselon by using the doctors to win the death games shame we never got the daleks vs cybermen in that special but hey so on two occasions it involved the time lords themselves now it's just written in for convenience sake oh and it's in the episode of remembrance of the daleks when the 7th doctor is modding aces bad the funeral director has a phone and says yes the doctor but governor didn't you say he was an old man with white hair it was in the episode itself making it Canon as the 7th doctor came a few months later by earth time from the frist doctors departure but yes like failoni and Kathleen Kennedy did with star wars rtd and gatwa will destroy established Canon of Dr who if need be.
@@robertharrison1058 ... I... yeah, I know those episodes. You're right about the "old man with white hair" reference, I stand corrected there. The reference in the book was explicitly from the first Doctor's point of view.
Why have they sped his voice up ? 🤔.
Copyright.
Did you watch the episode, or is this some ai jargin lol
Oh man, I'm so glad that I'm not watching this now. Being a Christian, who also suffers from depression, this could tip me over the edge. All those who have suicidal thoughts (which I luckily do not have) should avoid this episode like the plague. (I wonder if the suicide rate will go up after this?)
It's for reasons like this, ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
that I do these videos in my spare time!
Dr.Who is just hot,hot,hot, garbage! DEI and wokeness has killed the heart and character of the Doctor!
Killed the brain of the Doctor, and that's the worst part.
Why do they keep saying it's *insert year here* so I'm forcing my opinion on the public
Let’s regenerate
We don't want your world rtd we the doctor back not this rubbish
My guy you are just blinded by hate and you come across a little sensitive no one is forcing you to watch the show but keep boosting the rating hate watching that always works out great
it's dead after timeless child
Just put Doctor Who out of its misery. Been dead since 2017.
RTD puts HIS world on screen? Forget Doctor Who universe then!!
I didn’t find this review polarizing at all, despite comments going on both sides (looking at you ardent defenders and scripture quoters). It’s 100% possible to have a great, thought-provoking episode about a fake war caused by a company without saying “capitalism is bad mmmkay”. It’s also possible to have religion in an episode without reducing it to “faith is dumb”. That’s pretty much the complaint and it’s a valid complaint no matter which side you fall on.
They push that "faith is dumb message" while pushing for a Multi religion/Multifaith society....
The message isn't 'faith is dumb', it's that faith shouldn't be used for war and hatred, but instead for love and peace. That's why the doctor says "keep the faith" at the end, as well as "just because I don't like it doesn't mean I don't need it"
Matt Smith was the last doctor. he is now stuck in an alternate universe with dragons and greens and blacks
Womp womp
This episode was good imo, didn’t enjoy the other 2 and whether u like it or not this was a huge step up.
This video is Boring
Do you mean: bore
verb - gerund or present participle: boring
1. make (a hole) in something, especially with a revolving tool.
Or were you referring to something else? 🤔
They mean boring@@StephenRansom47
@@usm4n992 good grief, really? Well, jinkies … I’m so sorry to bother you with my snark, and lampoon of their simple graffiti …
I highly recommend watching a dog piss on a tree to mark their territory … no, that’s to sophisticated.
@@StephenRansom47 i can't tell if you're trying to be funny, or trying to act smart, neither are working btw.
@@usm4n992 😂
It’s a special technique I’m working on … I’m Boring like that.
Continue to Comment - it’s all virtual.
ur allowed to be wrong and thats okay
It is not acceptable to be told "it's okay to be wrong", from someone who's so wrong they can't use punctuation or spell the word "you're".
"We're all embracing this...", he says. Er, no, we're not. The show needs to be renamed. How about 'Dr WTF?'
It feels like 2084
What about this episode is “juvenile and vindictive” I saw and experienced a short mature concise story about the doctor standing on a land mine and talking about how blind faith without critical thinking can work with capitalism to fund wars, similar to the Israel-Palestine conflict currently taking place in modern time. I know it might be shocking to you but when it was saying not to have blind faith it wasn’t just mentioning Christianity it was mentioning all forms of blind faith. If you can’t see that in the episode then you must be suffering from some form of media illiteracy because it doesn’t take much to see what I just said above.
"all forms of blind faith" when there are literally only Anglicans there.
Tell you what I'll agree with that ONLY if the next they do this, it's Muslims instead, not Christians.
...psst, guess what... It'll never happen.
@@JoeTheUberGeek just because they are Anglicans does not mean that they are the only people they are talking about. Since when did the doctor in the episode state for anyone to not be Anglican, not once, they stated to not have blind faith and even stated at the end that it’s ok to have faith sometimes as the episode admits it is a complicated issue.
@@matrick2227 Then why are they the only ones represented on screen while they attack faith?
Suddenly we DONT want representation for Muslims and Sikhs and Hindus in a scene while Religion is being bashed?
You are trying to sanitize and excuse it, but this is Moffat being a tool. Don't try to run interference for it, it makes you seem complicit.
wtf? Faith MUST be blind. It literally means to believe something without proof.
@@lesigh1749 all of a sudden we need all types of religion on screen when we attack blind faith in religion it’s like you fail to see the allegory, I’m sure he chose an Anglican religion because it’s the first that came to mind but he could have just as easily chosen any other religion. Stop trying to make Christianity a victim here, it is not the only religion that fosters blind faith in followers. You get the same thing in cults, or the Muslim religion, what do you think Isis is, a fucking Muslim religious sect that pushes followers that blindly follow them to go to war, which is what the episode is criticising at points, the failure to look past your religion and believe it’s only attacking you is reductive and behaving the same way as you say the “snowflakes” act and is extremely reductive to any form of serious conversation about the nature of belief, religion, and faith.
Curious if RTD feels the same way about thoughts & prayers for Muslims- something tells me we’ll never know. 🙄
You meant Buddhist's. Did you not? Will you ever know? I doubt it. Also, Moffat wrote the episode. You would look less like a fool if you could get at least one thing right. Also, next time you want to comment on a Christian themed show. Please "Think" in Christian..... Should be easy according to you.
I think I see what you mean; living near Hollywood, I've seen over the years that there are many "Hollywood types" who claim they can't stand spirituality but at the same are wildly bonkers about Muslims, for whatever reason. :/
Cant see the doctor ever telling Yaz her faith was a means of not having to think for herself. That would not have passed the BBC standards.
It's been trash since matt Smith left. Sorry I meant absolute shite not trash.
Capaldi was half-fine, he put up a decent effort while the show was declining
I agree with the exception of a few of Capaldi's episodes such as Heaven Sent, which I feel is a top 10 episode of 'old new Who'.
"Were all embracing this" eh no we aren't. You do you but we are literally being forced to and kids being blatantly indoctrinated in schools. Also, If the Doctors gonna have tears down his face every episode, the tears will lose their meaning. It's just as casual as him blinking at this point. When chris, david, matts voices quivered you'd be like👀 woah.. because it was a moment that didn't happen much so when it did it eas very significant. But ive seen this doctor cry like 10 times at this point.. chill.
Is your faith before your mind?
Know me. Am I, the Doctor?
You're really gonna quote a non canon Pertwee song where he speaks rather than sings. People with faith also think. Don't be a bigot.
Brain dead take lol. Hears a simple argument against capitalism and a contextually apt and engaging argument against the faith of FICTIONAL RELIGIOUS people and freaks out about it. And I thought leftists were the ones who got triggered? 🤔😂
hahaha literally, it's honestly hilarious to watch
You are the only brain dead person here, my dude. 😢 those so called fictional religious guys are meant to represent the real ones. I know it's hard to believe.
Oh yeah capitalism bad, just because, you know, socialism never killed anyone.
@@unusualgrunt4027it’s true the world we live in revolves around capitalism, but why can’t we criticise the system?
@@poeticbradley3521 because most criticism aren't criticism of capitalist but socialist like policy put into law.
Especially through the government, like extortionate health and Safety regulations that bankrupt most small businesses, unlike big businesses which are pre establish and have the necessary resources already.
These are then blamed on capitalism instead of government meddling.
@@unusualgrunt4027
what do you think about the commentary in Boom specifically then? Because the whole business prioritising profit over health and safety I think is fair game.
Oh great yet another "Doctor Who has been overtaken by DEI Propaganda" video.
The Doctor is going to wake up and it's all been a dream (nightmare for the rest of us fans).
i haven't watched Dr who since the late 80s. this creation is just a big pile of poo. who put it there for Fack Sake! i realise now why i haven't watched tv since 2021. cant stand the constant messaging be rammed down my throat non stop.
If you haven't watched it after the 80s, how do you know it's bad? Because some RUclipsrs said so? Lmao.
@@anciantnagha I've watched it from 1979 to today including all the available backstories and read the novels between the two series. @harbourwoodlandvisitor2445 is not entirely right; it's not a big pile of poo, it's what happens when people eat the pile and then poo.
Triggered much?
Great video. Judging by some of these comments, you're right on target.
Yep. The haters of the truth gonna hate.
Every pile of crap has flies.
You aren’t special.
@@AttakusZakus 2.6 and 2.4 million flies so far, lets see how that holds up
@@lesigh1749 Down from the 1979 episode "City Of Death" with 16.1 million "flies". When the British population was 56.2 million, compared to today's 66.97 million. Ahahahahaha.
@@troffle Just 2.04 million last night, and that was almost certainly the best written episode this series will have.
The acting is so bad from Nurse What smh
Russel is allowed to make mistakes. Making fun of him because he misgendered someone is just stupid.
The Doctor doesn’t shame anyone for their faith. He just explains how blind faith can be misplaced. And the episode even ends with him admitting that he needs faith himself. If you think the episode is about how faith is wrong you clearly got the wrong idea. It’s more about not placing all your faith into something without even thinking for yourself.
You said your favorite era of this show was written by Moffat. Then you should probably remember that Moffat has written multiple episodes that criticize capitalism. Thin Ice and Oxygen come to mind. Especially Oxygen is very similar on this matter.
And oh my god, if you think that there was a message in the episode because 3 male characters die and the 2 female characters survive, you are literally lost. Characters die! And oftentimes this has nothing to do with a political message.
However, I suppose you made it clear that you are not interested in an actual discussion.
Exactly
Okay big boy, just list of two of the worst Moffat era episodes. And most of peter capaldis era was awful and overrated.
Also not gonna waste my time on this trash. wasted enough time watching the last few seasons and most of it was just insuffable garbage and unwatchable.
Rather watch somebody rant because atleast that's entertaining and not insulting.
@@unusualgrunt4027 Then don’t waste your time. Either, you give constructive criticism because you actually want something to improve or just leave. Criticism is ok but this is not criticism. It’s just ranting without common sense and without explaining why something is bad.
@@The_BIazeI did criticise you, the chose of episodes you chose as examples of Moffat woke writing. Which I said were bad as well. How about you read before you reply.
@@unusualgrunt4027 What’s the problem here? I chose these episodes not because they are good, but because they are political. Moffat has always written like that, yet Joe says he wrote his favorite era.
And you criticized me, not the show. What’s wrong with Boom?
Hahaha, you've been triggered.
Nice you titled the video after yourself
Bruh you're the sensitive one
Oh shut up. You'd eat garbage if Moffat and Davies told you to do it. Classic Who was way better.
He's entitled to his opinion. Don't like it? Go elsewhere. Point of fact, why are you even here? There are plenty of reviews brownosing this episode.
@@steveandjeanniefrith236 Cause it's fun to take the piss out of you morons who cry over the tiniest things.
@@steveandjeanniefrith236At this point, seeing how many times you've commented on this video, I'ld say you're sensitive as well lol
@@gene1131couldn’t have said it better myself, I’ve seen like 4 absolutely horrendous whining comments from this dude on this video alone.
Not as bad as Ep 1 and 2 but still poor. Ncuti doesn't cut it as The Doctor and the story and what the characters do often doesn't make sense. RIP Doctor Who.
WOMP WOMPPPPPPPP
If you can't write anything useful, step away from the screen.
@@troffle pfft WOMP WOMP to you specifically🫵😏
@@gabbyhughes9111 So, I'm hearing that you had some developmental issues neurologically growing up.
@@troffle WOMP WOMP
@@katlaskyanite Seek psychiatric help.
Another episode of the preaching "Doctor". Nee dank je. The real Doctor Who ended in 1989.
It's not like Doctor Who hasn't been progressive, it's just that it was better when being progressive before imo. The Doctor is genderfluid but it was never really a big deal
He wasn’t genderfluid until the 13th Doctor. It wasn’t suggested that time lords could change sex until Steven Moffat’s era
@@LeviPennington-vv2kq 12th said another TimeLord was his man-crush in the past, saying he was pretty sure she was a man at the time.
Right. But still, before the Moffat era, all time lords were thought to be one sex throughout their whole lives and one sex only. Plus, there is a big difference between changing your “gender” and changing your sex. The Doctor is not “gender fluid”. His biological makeup changes
Because genderfluid isn't real and no one can change there sex.
@@LeviPennington-vv2kq one of your upvotes is mine.
Here's further ammunition for your argument:
- assume regeneration is like birth and there's a roughly 50-50 chance of genderswapping. What are the odds of regenerating 14 times and having only one swap? What are the odds of flipping a coin thirteen times and coming up heads every time? 0.0122%. Would you bet the house on that?
- Moffat made his appearances of the First Doctor come out to be a lot more sexist than he used to be. Moffat introduced the idea of genderswapping regeneration. How stupid would you as a Time Lord have to be to be sexist when you've grown up in a society where either last week or next week you might be the opposite gender?
- From Colin Baker, we know the Time Lords have been at their status of "absolute power" for ten million years. If your society regularly gender-swaps with regeneration, why would you have the separate terms "Time Lord" and "Time Lady" after TEN MILLION YEARS?
- gender-swapping is boring and pedestrian, just like the TV show. In the books, they had regenerations into alien species for Time War missions. Moffat is a boring, stupid and pedestrian writer.
Irony: People screaming "If you don't like it, don't watch it!" As they watch and comment on YOUR video.
I know u liked it....come on.....say it
Schizo response😂
There’s nothing likable about it, so… no.
😂😂 this episode is amazing
it only got 2.04 million overnight viewers in the u.k that is another drop of 360,000 viewers from episode 2 ! oh well i am off now to go and stroke the grass in the grounds of wayne manor.
Alot of people lacking self-awareness in the comments. Now all of a sudden being triggered, offended, complaining about media, or being outraged by things that don't matter is a bad thing? I mean, I wish we could've come to an agreement about this year's ago, but hey let's just perpetuate it for close to a decade to the point where everyone is doing it.😂
"This is the world". His little world maybe, but not in the real world outside his ivory tower. And isn't it amazing how people who rant about the evils of capitalism are always stinking rich and taking money from the ever richer.
Hebrews 11:1
"Now faith is the substance of what is hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."
Faith is proof.
Faith is proof of delusion.
That is what tv licence pay for btw
Yeah, yeah, you are a liar.
😂 It’s awful. 😂😂😂😂 I like Neil Patrick Harris so does giving me the “you hate queers” gas. This is flamboyant and the doctor has never been flamboyant. And jinkx is always getting into trouble for sexual harassment. It’s filth. It’s retardis
Go bloodbend yourself
i have to disagree with the statement " doctor who is over" since me and every left wing fan are still watching it.
EDIT: i will admit "every left wing fan" was a big statement but i'm still seeing loads of people like it and i personally love it
Time will tell if there's enoughh of you to keep the show on the air. If the past is any indicator, the answer will be no.
The ratings prove that's not true.
and your doing worse than the garbage of jodie whittiker as the doctor and she was the worst at her time like the conservative party lefty woke lot just ruin everything for everyone else by being up their own backsides like the draconian right wing.
I'm left-wing and have been since 1980 when "Doctor Who" made me left-wing.
And this new series is utter trash.
@troffle I consider myself slightly right of center, but I'm American, so I'm probably significantly "right" of most Europeans... lol.
I love Tom Baker era Doctor Who, and enjoyed the reboot up until it became " the incredibly amazing Clara and some incidental, insignificant, background characters."
Imho, the did Capaldi wrong, and it's just steadily gotten worse and worse .
This is nothing new. In Star Trek: Strange New Worlds season one they tried to present the show as being more traditional Trek but every male white human episode-guest character got one line and was then either killed or rendered unconscious for the rest of the episode. I'm sure the white men running these shows are trying to tell us something but I'll be damned if I can see it.
If i thought there was anything in this video worth mentioning, then I would try and have a discussion with you. Enjoy your less than 1k views on most videos without something clickbait in the title. New Doctor Who deserves some criticism, like every single incarnation, but you aren’t smart enough to pull it off. Sorry babes. Most of the universe is knackered, and this channel plays a heavy part in that. Kisses xoxo
They definitely have good points worth mentioning, for example how awful every rtd episode has been bar the tennant episodes, and even those left a lot to be desired.
I liked boom, and I dont agree with every criticism here, but there are definitely good points also. This season vs 2005 season 1 just aren't comparable in terms of writing and characters.
Uh, you just mentioned this video.
why is the doctor is crying so much ?
Because he's a wimp.
That started with 10 he even went out like a bitch with his last words "I don't want to go".
You try not crying when you step on a live mine.
@@ahmadrunningwild85 I'm not a Time Lord. The Fourth Doctor stood on a landmine and didn't weep a single tear.
@@ahmadrunningwild85 The fourth doctor didnt blub.
Lol how is the white female doctor more masculine than the black male.😂