Good lord...the sheer amount of stupid in the comments here is astonishing, even for youtube. So many people not understanding that this is a quick cut together of many, MANY hours of work to correctly assemble an engine, and ending with the 'money shots' of the final dyno pulls. For the unsure - of course there was assembly lube, and yes all of the required steps were followed to ensure longevity - one doesn't build engines professionally unless willing to stand behind the work. Of course the engine was broken in before those final dyno runs were made - as well as many other dyno pulls to tune it correctly. COMMON SENSE*, people!!1! What I really liked was listening to the change in tone as they loaded up the engine against the dyno - you can clearly hear the power level increasing. Engine dynos are nice... K Fox * Oh wait, I forgot - this is the internet...
+Fullboost Thanks! I do try...though sometimes I get frustrated by internet peeps and the attitudes you only see here...but sharing knowledge is fun. Thanks for the interesting channel! K Fox
@@Drunkonair12 Exactly highest octane pump gus in Usa is 93, but with the name "AKI" Anti Knock index (RON+MON/2), in europe and here on south america at least we use just the RON number, that in my country at least is 98 the highest. Btw, i just love watching engines making great power on pump gas, it´s just amazing. Great Video!
Wow... I really enjoy reading these comment sections and getting a lot of " Professional" advice from the many ENGINE builders among us. Gives me a chuckle about how serious one can get over a You Tube video of an ENGINE build, the likes of which these professionals will NEVER encounter. But seriously lads. She's a beautiful build. Sounds great. Excellent outcome and everyones happy. Well done aye.You boys should be very proud of yourselves.
@@darrenparkinson4576 because v8 supercars have their engines built in house at every team’s workshop. They have foundries so they can make their own parts. And Dandy engines is more for drag racing, not circuit work.
Right on man. ...of course he used assembly lube !. ...geeeesh. why would they even have to be shown that ? Some things can be assumed , the dude clearly knows what he is doing , but anyway thank you for time stamping it for the dummies.
Pretty interesting build. The power numbers aren't particularly surprising, this engine mimics the Ford NASCAR engine components and modifications prior to the introduction of the FP9, with the exception of the bore/stroke changes to make 460ci as compared to 358ci. At 358ci, we saw (I built engines for S&H Motorsports for NASCAR's truck series) 775 -780 horsepower under the 9 to 1 compression ratio rules. Kinda fun to see that the older ('90s) NASCAR engine technology lives on!
That is amazing...love the video and what an engine! I have built a number of 351 Cleveland's back in the 80's that made maybe 330 hp lol!! What is really interesting is at 5250rpm it looks like about 620hp and 620 ft-lb.....with nearly 2500 rpm to go! What an engine and what a build. Jealous a little :)
Nice build. I have to chuckle when commentators wonder about DOHC, or why not build a 2,000 Hp twin turbo compared to a 7 Litre pushrod small block. The "big" beauty of these engines when built right using the best parts is the benefit of monster torque and horsepower combined into a single package. Commentators seem to forget the basics. These engines are often going into cars that weigh 3,500+ lbs. I'd like to see a 2.0 Litre Twin Turbo try to keep up with 680 ft lbs of torque (multiplied through a good transmission) and attempt to keep up an identical size and weight car. Callies cranks and Dark Blocks are excellent foundations. For those that haven't used Callies, they are well known for using very high quality steel with a twist resistance and superb counterweight design. I have never seen one break. But they are expensive as hell. Engine builders love them for the ease in which to balance the rotation assembly too. You pay for what you get. DOHC hemi style heads were once available for Small Block Fords, designed by Gurney Racing engines in the 1960's. Used at Indy, they were not as efficient as the Ford Cosworth versions (which did not use a factory style SBF block) and were soon discontinued. All the components to make a DOHC head work eats horsepower. The real bench racing argument has always been about Chevrolet Small block intake port placement versus Ford's spread bore design - which one was better. It's been long argued that Chevrolet's design equalized the intake runner size and distance to the cylinder for more power than Ford's. With it came technical cooling and exhaust scavenging challenges. Today's camshaft designs and use of dyno's has pretty much equalized and solved both engines flaws. I bet Dandy could make equal power out of either one. Smokey Yunick was famous for stating, "an engine doesn't know what the name of it is, and doesn't care" - who built powerful Ford and Chevrolet engines for decades. Yunick built Ford's, Pontiac's, Chevrolet's, Hudson's, Buicks, Oldmobile's, small blocks, big blocks, DOHC's, Lean burn technology... you name it, he probably tried it. A genius decades ahead of his time. For a small lightweight small block V-8, making 800+ reliable horsepower is a lot harder than most think. This one is a beauty. +1
It's actually common for small liter engines.... But this engine is well done, and very reliable. Many high HP/torque small liter engines will blow their head gaskets readily. I would rather have the reliability over pushing absolute boundaries. The push rods are, however, a limitation for these vehicles, and limit higher RPM operations due to float, as flex is seen at high torque and rpms. A dual overhead cam setup can help mitigate this, and allow for tighter tolerances, especially with a chain driven timing belt. The beauty here is in the simpicity, as rods are more reliable at normal operating rpms. They did great on this machine.
Personally I think it's a good build 👌🏿👌🏿👌🏿. I read a lot of the comments & all I could do was chuckle. If they didn't do the things that engine builders do when building an engine I'm sure it would have blown up. They were just compressing the video tryna 2 sho as much as possible quickly
I really enjoyed the video especially with the adjustments in between dyno runs that produced more HP. So, with that 4.250" stroke Callies crankshaft, that block by DART is a .030" over 4.125" bore. We just repaired a SCAT 460 Ford c/s with a 5.000" stroke. That 5.000" stroker in a .030" over 460 Ford gives it 605CID. Thanks again for the very professional and detailed video.
hello I'm from Brazil, and here is not very common tuning in V8. I wonder what the function of the vacuum pump placed on it and what its function. Thank you and sorry for my bad english
It creates crank case vacuum which reduces pumping losses. Normally, as the pistons pump up and down they push air. The crank is not very aerodynamic either. The vacuum pump removes the air/blow-by and reduces drag.
It also helps with ring seal. Especially if they are low tension rings. Low tension rings help horsepower by having less friction. and letting the rotating assembly turn easier.
It's sad when people talk crap about turbo lag and don't realize that they are complaining about the boost threshold. At least educate yourselves to complain accurately please. While I'm at it, what's wrong with power adders? Throw a twin turbo on this (after backing down the compression) or a supercharger and see WHP over 1000 not just off the crank. Power is power, if your a true car person you should love it all.
That's a shortsighted observation. You assume you can't have an even torque curve or power band on a boosted car (again, let's educate ourselves on correct terms)? Your statement is too open ended and assumes boosted equals peaky and high wear.
Yes lag is lag and threshold is threshold. One is the point when boost starts and the other is the time it takes to get to full boost (in Lehman's term). That being said, also who brought up 2.0 4 cylinder? Since when do we only boost small engines? You can build up a NA engine all you want but you will be limited and at some point will have to use a turbo, supercharger, or nitrous. That's how it's possible to take a 4 cylinder maxed at 250 hp to over 400 by boosting it.
This is not a point of small displacement forced induction versus large displacement naturally aspirated. My point is that power adders like chargers make any engine faster. Look at all of the fastest accelerating production cars and top speed production cars. Save for the V8 Aero Atom, what do they all have I'm common? Turbo or superchargers. Sure turbo engines can suck, so can big V8's (both of which I like btw). It's a matter of performance potential. You can argue all you want but every speed shop and modification shop will tell you that any engine will have greater power potential from power adders (except electrical cars, let's be honest).
Stephen Browne turbo lag is just for losers who dont downshift, if you shift properly, and keep up the throttle while cornering ( using the clutch ) you barely notice lag at all, no matter how big your turbo is
Ok, so I am not the only one that noticed that. My dad built his own race motors including a 900hp 540ci about 30 years ago and nothing went together dry including where the rockers touched the valve stems.. oil pump was primed with a drill before the engine ever ran and motor turned over by hand before the starter ever touched the flywheel..
Yeah I noticed that too. The only thing that was remotely lubricated was the lifters. I was taught from an early age that you put oil on the rod and main bearnigs along with the camshaft. And BG you are not alone. I was always taught to take a drill and prime the oil pump up so that oil is making it all the way up to the rocker arms.
If you search for "Secrets Behind The HPF 1000 RWHP Daily Driven BMW M3 Race Engines Part Four" and look about 6 minutes in the film He explaines why he does not add oil when fitting new pistons and rings. it's all because of the special rings and the way they are finishing the bores with some kind of brush. This is just my thoughts why they did not add oil in this motor :)
There was no shine to those parts and I would have used some assembly lube. My dad used to build 1000hp naturally aspirated race motors and he would cringe to see that thing being built without lube.
Yea the ford windsor engine has been around since 1962, so the design is a little more simple than a 32V DOHC AMG engine. These "locksmiths" just built an engine that puts out about double the power than a shitty AMG, so take your jeremy clarkson repeated bullshit somewhere else
kingssuck06 to be a little metrice here: 7.55 Litres, build to last about 500Kilometers (for you 310 Murican meters) ,compared with an 6.2 Litres that will last till muricans will stop praising their carbed big blocks .
vivalaphill So when ford makes just as much power with the 5.0 Coyote as the 6.2 AMG, where does your argument go then? Get jeremy clarksons balls out of your eyes. What will your next excuse be?
look at all these haters that never built an engine from scratch and don't understand what the blueprint numbers stand for... give me a break. go learn how to blueprint, build and tune an engine. then you will appreciate this video, it's not rocket science.
+Ramiro Pinon It's not hating, it's more along the lines of making fun of someone for using a carb and distributor in the year 2016... lol. Far better numbers and more granular control of fuel and spark (among other things) can be controlled with a computer and electronic fuel injection. This is a waste.... these builders are stuck in the past.
+stealth418 mate, these builders run 7s in full body leaf sprung Falcons's (injected turbos). Customers choice mate, he who has the cash calls the shots.
a waste, it still works well just like it did before granular control computers came along,have you owned an old v8 streetcar,fuck the new trend, i wouldnt want to add all that shit anyway.
+ExaltedDuck Looked like maybe Molybdenum grease to me. Regardless, he's doing several runs of 7500 rpm on that stroker. Must be doing something right.
ladamyre1 Certainly, yes, they are professionals with far more experience building engines far better than anything I'll likely ever get to drive. That is why I was surprised to see that particular step omitted. Perhaps it is a bit of their secret mojo.
+ExaltedDuck Have you considered that it takes a few trial assemblies to put together such an engine and that they took footage when it was convenient and not all footage was from the final assembly.
+Shawn Bradley I didn't see a lot of things. Like torquing all the bolts, using plastigage on the bearings, timing the cam, break-in, etc... but I'm not dumb enough to believe they didn't do any of that because it just made an 800hp dyno pull.
chains stretch and wear. the quality belts they can make these days are actually more reliable and consistent. Although I do like the sound of a chain better.
Cam insertion without lube or a cam stick, assembling rings without a ring tool, dropping pistons into cylinders without lube or rubber guides, letting the con-rod scrape along the cylinder bore, incorrect pull on the torque wrench, steel studs going into aluminum dry, electric screwgun used on them before hand-starting them, only one torque pass, shit that stud is going in cross-threaded, they'll have to pull the head and tap that hole. Trick parts, but looking sloppy as hell.
Terry Bartak what would you want? a fast engine assembly with little attention to detail which will inevitably end in premature failure. Or" some one who gives the passionate philosophical touch that this kind of highly strung race motor requires!! yea? The end...
That's impressive power through a carb. Nice. I'd love to see the whole, uncut, video of the engine assembly and running in. No music, just the sound of spanners, metal and engineering.
Australian video yet you are talking shit about americans, who invented the computers that the rest of the world uses for fuel injection. I am american and realize it is the land of freeDUMB but you sound like you are from there.
Incorrect! Step 1: start with about a 5 inch stack of hundred dollar bills. It doesnt matter what brand it is because money buys power. Its all about how much you can afford to build...lol
I am currently building a 6 cylinder Jaguar race engine, in this case what's to stop me calling it Ford after all absolutely none of it was manufactured by Ford. I mention this because I have run into it a number of times we build engines based on genuine manufacturers blocks and other parts granted these are enhanced/ augmented by racing rods and cams etc but the bulk is original then you get to a circuit and the car next to you has an engine that has never been anywhere near the original factory.
You don't really understand the concept of hot rodding ,do you. It's a Dart block based on a Ford design. Dart does the same thing with GM and MoPar engine designs.
fred grove All racing engines are built from the best factory and aftermarket parts available. Do you think the Chevys running at Indy are running the same engine as your Corvette or Vega?
That is some SICK power there- was the video edited because I didn't see any break-in, etc. Just wondering the advantage of copper head gaskets? Something to do with heat absorption?
Lot of really nice parts in that thing, but that's a really sloppy, careless build. Crank dropped in dry? Drag the rod down the bore installing pistons? Looks (obviously can't feel it myself) like there's more rotational drag with three slugs in it than the whole rotating assembly should have, with obvious tight spots. There's moly on the main bolts, but not enough to do anything. At one point, when he's blasting the head studs in with mini impact, it looks like he's got the phone up to his ear. Then there's the valve lash -- which you can see by how hard he's got to yank on the feeler -- that has to be too tight. Finally, I know it's got a giant roller in it, but it seems to be flopping around at idle on the dyno something fierce; more like misfire than idle lope. Sure, it makes good power, but for how long until it starts to tear itself apart? Was it a race to see how quickly it could be built?
Dude... I appreciate your comments :) Fuck I own this thing and I have nothing good at all to say about this build apart from the fact that I managed to catch it at 103km... I researched and developed the engine over two years, unfortunately I trusted DANDY to design and put the top end together for me as I was working FIFO and didn't have time... Bad Move! no expense spared and Dandy chose to put CRANE BLUE valve springs in the top and then rev her to 8500... The chugging you can hear is 7 broken inner valve springs... not to mention pistons actually kissing the heads by about a thou at high revs... 7k later the old girl is behaving well and giving me some good numbers at the track, Spewing this cnt is getting all the glory when Pats Garage developed it... I'm sure Dandy just threw it together to get a "High Horsepower Hit" on you tube... Cant complain... bad choice and hey shes doing well... 630 at the treads with a 9.5 on the first night :)
ThaCrew2008 that's B.S. I don't believe you.Gets obvious they're not gonna show every step of the build an a 8 minute video and the dyno said 7500 rpm and with 870 horsepower what's not to be happy about with only 12.5 comp and 98 pump.
nice to watch the build... but: OHC was invented decades before. The benefits of OHC are well known. Rediculous to still build this "decades behind up to date" engines. Why Ford came up with DOHC-engines as a brand new invention in the late 1970 years, some 4 decades after first invention of DOHC from Alpha Romeo we don´t know. Americans most probabely need some more time to adapte to new standarts. ;-)
That`s what i mean. Its not an OHC-engine and that is "behind standart". Pushrods are slow and it is a huge mass what has to be moved very fast in higher revs, what causes inefficient "breathing" of the cylinders. ;-)
Hey I love ohc motors, and if you do your homework on valve motion you'll see dohc doesn't have a huge advantage over a rocker arm sohc, the rocker arm allows faster valve acceleration and velocity meaning more lift for any given duration or less duration for any given lift But anyways, the pushrod v8 is actually a really compact package for its displacement. look up the illmore Mercedes Indy car by reverting to pushrods the rules allowed an extra 300cc not much but under boost its a ton. Or how about you check out a tf dragster about 10x the power per liter of a f1 or Moto gp Or how about a nhra pro stock. they take a pushrod valve terrain beyond 12000rpm And make 1450hp from 8l na btw this engine would rip whatever you have..... And if we go to hp per liter, it will still demolish what ever you own, and even if you owned a turbo 4 or what ever you fancy, on a road course the big na engine is a monster.... stick this in a ac cobra or a gt40.... you'll see some seriously pissed Lamborghini and Ferrari drivers when you pass them
+Harry Crete i dont think so :D just an idiot and thinks germans could do anything better haha ... seems like that car is new to the car / tuner scene and just wants some attention and representing his country ..thats one of the guys that would compare a little fine tuning manufacture with a huge mass producing tuner like amg just focused on the big factorys where everything has to look soooooo perfect but ok ...haha the funny thing is im an 17 year old car freak also living in germany and im really interested in how old that guy is
all big hp motors if you look will piss off the chain and run a belt due to its ease of service and timing ability and you can visually check it. and change the cam timing in 5 min....its not a daily driver chain wouldnt last a pass without oil
AND THE GERMANS WENT TO FORD 3 YEARS AGO FOR 3 CYLINDER TECHNOLOGY. FORD BUILT SELF DRIVING CARS 30 YEARS AGO. MERCEDES JUST DEVELOPED THIS TECHNOLOGY WITH OFF THE SELF PARTS FROM OTHERS.
Nice work in building the engine there are to many haters out there that don't know what horse power is just cuz they drive a civic lol keep it up the good work. I build a 408w with a 671 Hampton blower on a 94 Mustang old school style( Ford Racing )
What a masterpiece. Its beauty is in its simplicity. N/A American style, at its finest. Few things tho: I have never seen the sealing rings thats new for me. Can someone elaborate? And also, with as many timing belts as I have changed, what is the advantage of running it instead of a nice double roller? Or my personal favorite. ...noisy timing gears!
Were those O-rings they were installing at 2:56 & 3:42? A step I'm unfamiliar with. And what's with the gold piston tops? For show or functional? Damned impressive numbers.
The 427 is a different family of engine. From the factory the Windsor topped out at 351ci, although people do stroke the motor to 427ci and in this case 461ci.
My mom had a 1968 Ford Fairlane with a 428 Cobra Jet engine, wish they would have kept it, it is a Collectors dream and it was all original with the fluffy blue shag carpet from factory! They also had a 1968 Gold Plymouth GTX Convertible with 440, that was purchased new in California and drove to Indiana, the guy blew the motor and sold it to them for $400 in 1969! Had it been a Hemi there was only 36 produced that year! But for hers with the 440 there are places saying only 506 were Built that year! Both were mint condition, but they had kids to worry about and the vehicles never really mattered! When she was in high school you could buy 60's Impalla's used with 327's and 427's and True SS models for as low as $15! Wish those days were still here! The 427 Windsor as I was talking about was in the Saleen S7 (2000-2004) but it was bored and stroked 351 Windsor with 550 BHP at 6400 rpm! But that car was capable of 220 mph! In 2005 the Saleen S7 was upped with twin turbos and would top 248 mph and had the same engine with 750 BHP at 6300 rpm! In all reality I know ford only sold the 428 and 429 Cobra Jet big blocks and also had a Boss 429 Hemi, but Mickey Thompson did develop and manufacture a few modified 427 Hemi's but they would have been based upon ford big blocks that were available obviously the from the MEL "Lima Plant" or FE engine family! But while researching I found this from the FE family! The Ford single overhead cam (SOHC) 427 V8 engine, familiarly known as the "Cammer", was released in 1964 in an effort to maintain NASCAR dominance by seeking to counter the extremely powerful, enormously large block Chrysler 426 Hemi "elephant" engine. I obviously never mentioned "Factory Made 427 Windsor" (I Should have mentioned the Saleen S7), just was reading literature about it's power and the engine they had in it! But you should have guessed that, just as this video talks about, that it was a modified engine I was referring to! So thanks for reminding me to correct and clearly refer to where the information on the 427 Windsor was from!
People will always complain it's a giving when your posting videos. The funny thing is that people whom complain the most have never built an engine in their life. Maybe assembled an engine but not built it. A monkey can assemble an engine, but it takes a true Engine builder(Technician )to build an awesome machine.
That's maybe the first dyno session I've watched where more power was made without the carb spacer. That means they got it right when they designed that intake, lol. Sweet engine. Replace that carb with a throttle body, drill some injector ports, and it will be perfect for my '70 ford mustang restomod dream car.
Absolutely Incredible, hell of a build and im gona be considering that recipe in the future for sure. Great video and great job, keep the builds n recipes coming please!!
Heck of an engine there! Only thing I noticed though was on the dyno pulls, when the throttle got cracked open all the way it almost seemed like it was holding back for a few seconds, maybe a carb/timing tweak? Seemed like the motor couldn't overcome the dyno until it got some rev's up. Regardless though, a really nice build!
Put a feeler gauge between the connecting rods to take up the thrust clearance before you torque down your caps. If you'll take down one you just built the way you are, you'll see some of the bearings with a tiny bend where the twist let you mash the insert. That small place bleeds off some oil pressure and can make the difference when you're pushing the RPM limits.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Good lord...the sheer amount of stupid in the comments here is astonishing, even for youtube. So many people not understanding that this is a quick cut together of many, MANY hours of work to correctly assemble an engine, and ending with the 'money shots' of the final dyno pulls. For the unsure - of course there was assembly lube, and yes all of the required steps were followed to ensure longevity - one doesn't build engines professionally unless willing to stand behind the work. Of course the engine was broken in before those final dyno runs were made - as well as many other dyno pulls to tune it correctly. COMMON SENSE*, people!!1!
What I really liked was listening to the change in tone as they loaded up the engine against the dyno - you can clearly hear the power level increasing. Engine dynos are nice...
K Fox
* Oh wait, I forgot - this is the internet...
one of a very few intelligent comments :)
+Fullboost Thanks! I do try...though sometimes I get frustrated by internet peeps and the attitudes you only see here...but sharing knowledge is fun. Thanks for the interesting channel!
K Fox
Buncha know it alls. SAD
Oh god, you made me read the commets..my brain.... it hurts...
هههههه
That much power, 'naturally' and on pump gas is very impressive. I don't care what anybody says. Fantastic results !!!
Its a small block to boot!
Where do u buy your 98 octane pump gas?
@@chasewebber4316 Bit late but our octane is different form your octane our 98 I believe is your 93 octane
Ya? How’d they get there? No specs! Useless video of nothing more than assembling an engine.
@@Drunkonair12 Exactly highest octane pump gus in Usa is 93, but with the name "AKI" Anti Knock index (RON+MON/2), in europe and here on south america at least we use just the RON number, that in my country at least is 98 the highest. Btw, i just love watching engines making great power on pump gas, it´s just amazing. Great Video!
Although Im not a Ford fan... That is a thing of beauty!!! 864 horses and 662 foot pounds of KICK ASS!
So, this is my 2 year olds favourite video.. about 3 times per day I get to see this build... Lucky it's a good watch
My cousin had a 70 F-100 swb 2wd 3 on the column with a 351 Windsor, dude it was one of the best engines I've seen, and I'm a Chevy guy.
Wow... I really enjoy reading these comment sections and getting a lot of " Professional" advice from the many ENGINE builders among us. Gives me a chuckle about how serious one can get over a You Tube video of an ENGINE build, the likes of which these professionals will NEVER encounter. But seriously lads. She's a beautiful build. Sounds great. Excellent outcome and everyones happy. Well done aye.You boys should be very proud of yourselves.
Dandy engines are one of the most respected engine builders in this country
If the're so good,why aren't the main players in V8 Supercars queing-up to buy their services????
@@darrenparkinson4576 because v8 supercars have their engines built in house at every team’s workshop. They have foundries so they can make their own parts.
And Dandy engines is more for drag racing, not circuit work.
See money can buy you happiness
Happiness is a sidefect of the things you buy
For those that keep saying there is no assembly lube, what do you think that is at 1:07 and 2:32 a bucket of chips?
Martin Ellul 1:30
Martin Ellul they are all retards
Right on man. ...of course he used assembly lube !. ...geeeesh. why would they even have to be shown that ? Some things can be assumed , the dude clearly knows what he is doing , but anyway thank you for time stamping it for the dummies.
hey... the Cleveland engines were raced forever.. used to love the pro stock class.... heads are everything....
And that's why I went with a big cube, 351C.
Pretty interesting build. The power numbers aren't particularly surprising, this engine mimics the Ford NASCAR engine components and modifications prior to the introduction of the FP9, with the exception of the bore/stroke changes to make 460ci as compared to 358ci.
At 358ci, we saw (I built engines for S&H Motorsports for NASCAR's truck series) 775 -780 horsepower under the 9 to 1 compression ratio rules.
Kinda fun to see that the older ('90s) NASCAR engine technology lives on!
That is amazing...love the video and what an engine! I have built a number of 351 Cleveland's back in the 80's that made maybe 330 hp lol!!
What is really interesting is at 5250rpm it looks like about 620hp and 620 ft-lb.....with nearly 2500 rpm to go! What an engine and what a build. Jealous a little :)
Torque and Horsepower ALWAYS match at 5250, it is a math "thing" HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252
Nice build. I have to chuckle when commentators wonder about DOHC, or why not build a 2,000 Hp twin turbo compared to a 7 Litre pushrod small block. The "big" beauty of these engines when built right using the best parts is the benefit of monster torque and horsepower combined into a single package. Commentators seem to forget the basics. These engines are often going into cars that weigh 3,500+ lbs. I'd like to see a 2.0 Litre Twin Turbo try to keep up with 680 ft lbs of torque (multiplied through a good transmission) and attempt to keep up an identical size and weight car.
Callies cranks and Dark Blocks are excellent foundations. For those that haven't used Callies, they are well known for using very high quality steel with a twist resistance and superb counterweight design. I have never seen one break. But they are expensive as hell. Engine builders love them for the ease in which to balance the rotation assembly too. You pay for what you get. DOHC hemi style heads were once available for Small Block Fords, designed by Gurney Racing engines in the 1960's. Used at Indy, they were not as efficient as the Ford Cosworth versions (which did not use a factory style SBF block) and were soon discontinued. All the components to make a DOHC head work eats horsepower.
The real bench racing argument has always been about Chevrolet Small block intake port placement versus Ford's spread bore design - which one was better. It's been long argued that Chevrolet's design equalized the intake runner size and distance to the cylinder for more power than Ford's. With it came technical cooling and exhaust scavenging challenges. Today's camshaft designs and use of dyno's has pretty much equalized and solved both engines flaws. I bet Dandy could make equal power out of either one. Smokey Yunick was famous for stating, "an engine doesn't know what the name of it is, and doesn't care" - who built powerful Ford and Chevrolet engines for decades. Yunick built Ford's, Pontiac's, Chevrolet's, Hudson's, Buicks, Oldmobile's, small blocks, big blocks, DOHC's, Lean burn technology... you name it, he probably tried it. A genius decades ahead of his time. For a small lightweight small block V-8, making 800+ reliable horsepower is a lot harder than most think. This one is a beauty. +1
come on, 865 horses and 660 torques out of 7,5 litre engine? :D unacceptable!
It's actually common for small liter engines.... But this engine is well done, and very reliable. Many high HP/torque small liter engines will blow their head gaskets readily. I would rather have the reliability over pushing absolute boundaries. The push rods are, however, a limitation for these vehicles, and limit higher RPM operations due to float, as flex is seen at high torque and rpms. A dual overhead cam setup can help mitigate this, and allow for tighter tolerances, especially with a chain driven timing belt. The beauty here is in the simpicity, as rods are more reliable at normal operating rpms. They did great on this machine.
Ford > cheby
Personally I think it's a good build 👌🏿👌🏿👌🏿. I read a lot of the comments & all I could do was chuckle. If they didn't do the things that engine builders do when building an engine I'm sure it would have blown up. They were just compressing the video tryna 2 sho as much as possible quickly
I really enjoyed the video especially with the adjustments in between dyno runs that produced more HP. So, with that 4.250" stroke Callies crankshaft, that block by DART is a .030" over 4.125" bore. We just repaired a SCAT 460 Ford c/s with a 5.000" stroke. That 5.000" stroker in a .030" over 460 Ford gives it 605CID. Thanks again for the very professional and detailed video.
Look what i stumbled across!! Frankie Ma man. Me and Dad are watching. What a sound out of that motor. Awesome!
I would put that engine on a pedastal and display it as art.
12.5:1 compression ratio? That is damn impressive.
I'd love to hear it at 14:1 w some good fuel
Perfect engine for a Ford Maverick 1969-73 two door of course
Mavericls are hideous
I’m still here. Love this video. That’s a badass engine.
Amazing job building mg that emgine!!!! You guys are great it's good to see Ford power when it's done right
good to see any big hp engine done right..
hello I'm from Brazil, and here is not very common tuning in V8. I wonder what the function of the vacuum pump placed on it and what its function. Thank you and sorry for my bad english
It creates crank case vacuum which reduces pumping losses. Normally, as the pistons pump up and down they push air. The crank is not very aerodynamic either. The vacuum pump removes the air/blow-by and reduces drag.
thanks man, I was fascinated with it, thank you for your explanation
It also helps with ring seal. Especially if they are low tension rings. Low tension rings help horsepower by having less friction. and letting the rotating assembly turn easier.
It's sad when people talk crap about turbo lag and don't realize that they are complaining about the boost threshold. At least educate yourselves to complain accurately please. While I'm at it, what's wrong with power adders? Throw a twin turbo on this (after backing down the compression) or a supercharger and see WHP over 1000 not just off the crank. Power is power, if your a true car person you should love it all.
That's a shortsighted observation. You assume you can't have an even torque curve or power band on a boosted car (again, let's educate ourselves on correct terms)? Your statement is too open ended and assumes boosted equals peaky and high wear.
Yes lag is lag and threshold is threshold. One is the point when boost starts and the other is the time it takes to get to full boost (in Lehman's term). That being said, also who brought up 2.0 4 cylinder? Since when do we only boost small engines? You can build up a NA engine all you want but you will be limited and at some point will have to use a turbo, supercharger, or nitrous. That's how it's possible to take a 4 cylinder maxed at 250 hp to over 400 by boosting it.
This is not a point of small displacement forced induction versus large displacement naturally aspirated. My point is that power adders like chargers make any engine faster. Look at all of the fastest accelerating production cars and top speed production cars. Save for the V8 Aero Atom, what do they all have I'm common? Turbo or superchargers. Sure turbo engines can suck, so can big V8's (both of which I like btw). It's a matter of performance potential. You can argue all you want but every speed shop and modification shop will tell you that any engine will have greater power potential from power adders (except electrical cars, let's be honest).
Stephen Browne turbo lag is just for losers who dont downshift, if you shift properly, and keep up the throttle while cornering ( using the clutch ) you barely notice lag at all, no matter how big your turbo is
+TheEvanovitch ok so ride the clutch while cornering? yeah yeah lol
I noticed that no oil was added when fitting the bearings nor the piston rings. Why did you do so? Is there a specific reason ?
Ok, so I am not the only one that noticed that. My dad built his own race motors including a 900hp 540ci about 30 years ago and nothing went together dry including where the rockers touched the valve stems.. oil pump was primed with a drill before the engine ever ran and motor turned over by hand before the starter ever touched the flywheel..
Yeah I noticed that too. The only thing that was remotely lubricated was the lifters. I was taught from an early age that you put oil on the rod and main bearnigs along with the camshaft. And BG you are not alone. I was always taught to take a drill and prime the oil pump up so that oil is making it all the way up to the rocker arms.
LOL.. oil breather hangs out bottom of oil pan?
If you search for "Secrets Behind The HPF 1000 RWHP Daily Driven BMW M3 Race Engines Part Four" and look about 6 minutes in the film
He explaines why he does not add oil when fitting new pistons and rings. it's all because of the special rings and the way they are finishing the bores with some kind of brush.
This is just my thoughts why they did not add oil in this motor :)
There was no shine to those parts and I would have used some assembly lube. My dad used to build 1000hp naturally aspirated race motors and he would cringe to see that thing being built without lube.
i just watched the video of an 6.2 litre amg engine being assembled, those ford guys are locksmiths compared to those precision workers in germany
Yea the ford windsor engine has been around since 1962, so the design is a little more simple than a 32V DOHC AMG engine. These "locksmiths" just built an engine that puts out about double the power than a shitty AMG, so take your jeremy clarkson repeated bullshit somewhere else
kingssuck06 1 Word: Technology -> I won.
vivalaphill All that technology to make half as much power as an engine from the 60's? Makes sense......
kingssuck06 to be a little metrice here: 7.55 Litres, build to last about 500Kilometers (for you 310 Murican meters) ,compared with an 6.2 Litres that will last till muricans will stop praising their carbed big blocks .
vivalaphill So when ford makes just as much power with the 5.0 Coyote as the 6.2 AMG, where does your argument go then? Get jeremy clarksons balls out of your eyes. What will your next excuse be?
look at all these haters that never built an engine from scratch and don't understand what the blueprint numbers stand for... give me a break. go learn how to blueprint, build and tune an engine. then you will appreciate this video, it's not rocket science.
It's YT, lots of experts on everything, apparently the stats say they usually teenage males, so no experience or knowledge.
+Ramiro Pinon must be chevy guys
+Ramiro Pinon It's not hating, it's more along the lines of making fun of someone for using a carb and distributor in the year 2016... lol. Far better numbers and more granular control of fuel and spark (among other things) can be controlled with a computer and electronic fuel injection. This is a waste.... these builders are stuck in the past.
+stealth418 mate, these builders run 7s in full body leaf sprung Falcons's (injected turbos). Customers choice mate, he who has the cash calls the shots.
a waste, it still works well just like it did before granular control computers came along,have you owned an old v8 streetcar,fuck the new trend, i wouldnt want to add all that shit anyway.
860 NA on pump? Nice!
amazed mee too
Have you got literally nothing better to do than correct people's spelling in a comments section?
Don't worry about him. He goes around correcting everyone, but a good percentage of his "corrections" are wrong.
Great video, comments section made my brain hurt a little bit but amazing work.
I'm watching this from all the way in the U.S. Virgin Islands ! ! !
give the germans that many cubes and you would have enough power to launch te spaceshuttle
***** ive seen 400 ci n/a small block fords making close to 1200hp. Not only germans can make good hp
Only thing Germans can make is shower heads with 11 holes.
Ilya Kirkby lol Germans, I'm sure the guy that wants a 400ci v8 wants to actually drive it not repair it.
Kendin Çöz
》`
No pre-lube on the crackshaft and connector rod journals?
Medo.I don't believe
+ExaltedDuck Looked like maybe Molybdenum grease to me. Regardless, he's doing several runs of 7500 rpm on that stroker. Must be doing something right.
+ExaltedDuck My thoughts exactly. ???
ladamyre1 Certainly, yes, they are professionals with far more experience building engines far better than anything I'll likely ever get to drive. That is why I was surprised to see that particular step omitted. Perhaps it is a bit of their secret mojo.
+ExaltedDuck Have you considered that it takes a few trial assemblies to put together such an engine and that they took footage when it was convenient and not all footage was from the final assembly.
No run-in before giving it hell on the dyno?
+Terry Clark ofc there is, would you like to watch 30mins of engine run in and oil change? that would be a long video...
+PHUSII Fair enough, I guess modern engines don't need a lot of running in like the old days when it was 1000km or more.
+Terry Clark You want to hear hell on a dyno? Here you go - soundcloud.com/ckc-dillpickle/wind-up-sound
+Terry Clark Race engines are assembled with loose tolerances compared to factory stock engines.
+AmericanThunder really? I would have thought the tolerances would be much tighter...
This is one of the greatest videos on RUclips. Well done.
Awesome engine build, with great music. A rare combo.
Why would you assemble an engine dry like that without any assembly lube?
Noob
+Shawn Bradley Yes I was cringing each time the engine was cranked over.
you don,t see him put anything on it?
just asking a question there fuck nuts.
+Shawn Bradley I didn't see a lot of things. Like torquing all the bolts, using plastigage on the bearings, timing the cam, break-in, etc... but I'm not dumb enough to believe they didn't do any of that because it just made an 800hp dyno pull.
Totally fucking awesome!
Fort Worth, TX
holy cow, stronger than McLaren 675
Gonna lean on this again. What an absolute monster of an engine.
Looks cool when its new.Good job,greetings from Moscow Russia!
looks gorgeous except that timing belt, I hate belts as they are unrealiable. If that was a chain that engine would be perfect imo.
chains stretch and wear. the quality belts they can make these days are actually more reliable and consistent. Although I do like the sound of a chain better.
@@Trumplicanbelts also stretch and wear...and snap.
Cam insertion without lube or a cam stick, assembling rings without a ring tool, dropping pistons into cylinders without lube or rubber guides, letting the con-rod scrape along the cylinder bore, incorrect pull on the torque wrench, steel studs going into aluminum dry, electric screwgun used on them before hand-starting them, only one torque pass, shit that stud is going in cross-threaded, they'll have to pull the head and tap that hole.
Trick parts, but looking sloppy as hell.
lol
The pistons had lube on them, it was behind the ring which isn't inserted itself.
***** replygif.net/i/166.gif
But it only took them 8 minutes.
Terry Bartak what would you want? a fast engine assembly with little attention to detail which will inevitably end in premature failure. Or" some one who gives the passionate philosophical touch that this kind of highly strung race motor requires!!
yea? The end...
holy shit 860 on pump gas with no boost!
Boost is for pussies
Nobith Thanksy ถาม
That's impressive power through a carb. Nice.
I'd love to see the whole, uncut, video of the engine assembly and running in. No music, just the sound of spanners, metal and engineering.
FORD FTW!! Gotta love small block Fords.
I have one word; LUBRIPLATE!
1968 called, they want their carburator back!
1998 called your dads nutsack wants you back...lol
Australian video yet you are talking shit about americans, who invented the computers that the rest of the world uses for fuel injection. I am american and realize it is the land of freeDUMB but you sound like you are from there.
F.I. gives no more HP...a lot of times less...just better cold-start and stuff.
Buff Barnaby
You have no idea what you are talking about, would you also say that WW2 bombs had better accuracy then guided munitions from today?
@@numberpirate fail comparison. its rather about the bang
Gotta love that assembly lube! Works so good you dont even have to put it on!
music to my ears...beautifully done...ooorrraaahhh...salute from the Philippines...
but will it fit my honda ?
Fuck u and your Honda
Sel Gules haha :D vtec POWERSHIFT vtec POWERSHIFT ^_^
MAAAAD!
With enough time and money. But I wouldn't waste a good engine on a Honda...
There is no replacement for displacement, high compression and the music and smoothness of 8 cylinders!
Lol
How to build horsepower.
Step 1. Start with a Ford....
Incorrect! Step 1: start with about a 5 inch stack of hundred dollar bills. It doesnt matter what brand it is because money buys power. Its all about how much you can afford to build...lol
It was just a joke dude. calm down
Krankie V He said "lol"... You calm down.
there isn't hardly a Ford part in this motor! Not the block, the heads, the cam, the oil pump, a bearing ANYTHING!
It was a joke, and it is Ford design, just not built by them. Chill out lol
Very nice build, all NA. Incredible running a 4.250 stroker to 7500? Interesting to see the heavy metal plugs for the crankshaft balancing 👍
So cool to hear the pistons expand and lubing up when running!
Which bit of this engine was Ford?
This is one of the few comments, that no-one has commented on, not even "Anthony Space-cadet Smiff"...
block design i guess.. they could of used a ford aftermarket block with the same results rather then a dart block.
I am currently building a 6 cylinder Jaguar race engine, in this case what's to stop me calling it Ford after all absolutely none of it was manufactured by Ford. I mention this because I have run into it a number of times we build engines based on genuine manufacturers blocks and other parts granted these are enhanced/ augmented by racing rods and cams etc but the bulk is original then you get to a circuit and the car next to you has an engine that has never been anywhere near the original factory.
ALL IS FORD.
you should change the title from How to build HORSEPOWER to How to assemble HORSEPOWER.
Why call it a 'FORD' when every component is aftermarket? It may be a Ford pattern but it really isn't a Ford engine.
Well there are parts from several different companies. And this is a ford block ssooo?
Watch it again, it is not a Ford block, it is an aluminium copy of a small block,
fred grove
ye copy of ford block,so design and all of potential is ford .dosent mather whou cast it
You don't really understand the concept of hot rodding ,do you. It's a Dart block based on a Ford design. Dart does the same thing with GM and MoPar engine designs.
fred grove All racing engines are built from the best factory and aftermarket parts available. Do you think the Chevys running at Indy are running the same engine as your Corvette or Vega?
Excellent work ! Some beautiful music from that beast of an engine !
That is some SICK power there- was the video edited because I didn't see any break-in, etc. Just wondering the advantage of copper head gaskets? Something to do with heat absorption?
+jim dandy copper head gasket holds pressure much better than others and is less likely to fail over time.
Lot of really nice parts in that thing, but that's a really sloppy, careless build. Crank dropped in dry? Drag the rod down the bore installing pistons? Looks (obviously can't feel it myself) like there's more rotational drag with three slugs in it than the whole rotating assembly should have, with obvious tight spots. There's moly on the main bolts, but not enough to do anything. At one point, when he's blasting the head studs in with mini impact, it looks like he's got the phone up to his ear. Then there's the valve lash -- which you can see by how hard he's got to yank on the feeler -- that has to be too tight. Finally, I know it's got a giant roller in it, but it seems to be flopping around at idle on the dyno something fierce; more like misfire than idle lope.
Sure, it makes good power, but for how long until it starts to tear itself apart? Was it a race to see how quickly it could be built?
Dude... I appreciate your comments :) Fuck I own this thing and I have nothing good at all to say about this build apart from the fact that I managed to catch it at 103km... I researched and developed the engine over two years, unfortunately I trusted DANDY to design and put the top end together for me as I was working FIFO and didn't have time... Bad Move! no expense spared and Dandy chose to put CRANE BLUE valve springs in the top and then rev her to 8500... The chugging you can hear is 7 broken inner valve springs... not to mention pistons actually kissing the heads by about a thou at high revs... 7k later the old girl is behaving well and giving me some good numbers at the track, Spewing this cnt is getting all the glory when Pats Garage developed it... I'm sure Dandy just threw it together to get a "High Horsepower Hit" on you tube... Cant complain... bad choice and hey shes doing well... 630 at the treads with a 9.5 on the first night :)
30k
ThaCrew2008 that's B.S. I don't believe you.Gets obvious they're not gonna show every step of the build an a 8 minute video and the dyno said 7500 rpm and with 870 horsepower what's not to be happy about with only 12.5 comp and 98 pump.
@Tim Martin he's got a video of the engine in his car, fucknuts.
after all that they put a carb on the mill kind of a waste
+cartmanrlsusall I was thinking the same.
cartmanrlsusall you gotta be a moron. A carb is cheaper easy to tune and makes more power.
nice to watch the build... but: OHC was invented decades before. The benefits of OHC are well known. Rediculous to still build this "decades behind up to date" engines. Why Ford came up with DOHC-engines as a brand new invention in the late 1970 years, some 4 decades after first invention of DOHC from Alpha Romeo we don´t know. Americans most probabely need some more time to adapte to new standarts. ;-)
+stollifa Appreicate an old muscle car for what it is, it suits the car perfectly and sounds unreal.
+stollifa I believe this is an OHV engine, the cam is near the crankshaft not near the valves and the valves are driven by pushrods.
That`s what i mean. Its not an OHC-engine and that is "behind standart". Pushrods are slow and it is a huge mass what has to be moved very fast in higher revs, what causes inefficient "breathing" of the cylinders. ;-)
Fullboost
of course, u are right. It´s what it is...
Hey I love ohc motors, and if you do your homework on valve motion you'll see dohc doesn't have a huge advantage over a rocker arm sohc, the rocker arm allows faster valve acceleration and velocity meaning more lift for any given duration or less duration for any given lift
But anyways, the pushrod v8 is actually a really compact package for its displacement.
look up the illmore Mercedes Indy car by reverting to pushrods the rules allowed an extra 300cc not much but under boost its a ton.
Or how about you check out a tf dragster about 10x the power per liter of a f1 or Moto gp
Or how about a nhra pro stock. they take a pushrod valve terrain beyond 12000rpm And make 1450hp from 8l na
btw this engine would rip whatever you have..... And if we go to hp per liter, it will still demolish what ever you own, and even if you owned a turbo 4 or what ever you fancy, on a road course the big na engine is a monster....
stick this in a ac cobra or a gt40.... you'll see some seriously pissed Lamborghini and Ferrari drivers when you pass them
proud of you dandy
grouse - good job fellas - impressed with the vacuum pump as well!
looks semi professional. but i forgot, im german and used to perfect engineering ( eg AMG)
+Harry Crete haha what a dumbass every country and more every mechanic has its own strenghts and weaknesses
+Harry Crete i dont think so :D just an idiot and thinks germans could do anything better haha ... seems like that car is new to the car / tuner scene and just wants some attention and representing his country ..thats one of the guys that would compare a little fine tuning manufacture with a huge mass producing tuner like amg just focused on the big factorys where everything has to look soooooo perfect but ok ...haha the funny thing is im an 17 year old car freak also living in germany and im really interested in how old that guy is
+Harry Crete and sorry for the bad english oh man its so long ago i had to use it :/
If you look closer there are some Japanese laughing at your joke
+Harry Crete aren't you the one who is jealous here? kek
there were so many things wrong with that build
Well why don't you show us folks how's it done! Otherwise shut the fuck up and let us enjoy the got damn video!!
Your comment makes my nuts itch. There’s always some dickhead that thinks they’ve done it better. Please teach the class Jimmy boy
what they messed up on was that fact they used a timing belt not a chain so i wouldn't buy that motor
all big hp motors if you look will piss off the chain and run a belt due to its ease of service and timing ability and you can visually check it. and change the cam timing in 5 min....its not a daily driver chain wouldnt last a pass without oil
because you are an expert
No expert just 20 years of experience learning every day keyboard worrier. ...
***** I just paid $2500 to replace one
Nascar engines use belts.
I put a bored & stroked 251 Windsor in my Superformance AC Cobra. Almost 500hp. Smooth and powerful with pump gas.
How to build horsepower.
Step 1 - Go to the Germans
AND THE GERMANS WENT TO FORD 3 YEARS AGO FOR 3 CYLINDER TECHNOLOGY. FORD BUILT SELF DRIVING CARS 30 YEARS AGO. MERCEDES JUST DEVELOPED THIS TECHNOLOGY WITH OFF THE SELF PARTS FROM OTHERS.
More like unreliable horsepower 🤣🤣🤣
Yeah this is real practical innovation it tell you that technical technology is holds the world
Nice work in building the engine there are to many haters out there that don't know what horse power is just cuz they drive a civic lol keep it up the good work. I build a 408w with a 671 Hampton blower on a 94 Mustang old school style( Ford Racing )
I'm a Chevy guy, but that bad boy is a beast, nice work!
Wow that intake sounds so good!!
What a masterpiece. Its beauty is in its simplicity. N/A American style, at its finest. Few things tho: I have never seen the sealing rings thats new for me. Can someone elaborate? And also, with as many timing belts as I have changed, what is the advantage of running it instead of a nice double roller? Or my personal favorite. ...noisy timing gears!
It is appreciable to see engine assembly from abnitio to testing. great job and a lot for learners as well as users.
Were those O-rings they were installing at 2:56 & 3:42? A step I'm unfamiliar with. And what's with the gold piston tops? For show or functional? Damned impressive numbers.
Was just reading about the Windsor's, the 427 is impressive!
The 427 is a different family of engine. From the factory the Windsor topped out at 351ci, although people do stroke the motor to 427ci and in this case 461ci.
My mom had a 1968 Ford Fairlane with a 428 Cobra Jet engine, wish they would have kept it, it is a Collectors dream and it was all original with the fluffy blue shag carpet from factory! They also had a 1968 Gold Plymouth GTX Convertible with 440, that was purchased new in California and drove to Indiana, the guy blew the motor and sold it to them for $400 in 1969! Had it been a Hemi there was only 36 produced that year!
But for hers with the 440 there are places saying only 506 were Built that year! Both were mint condition, but they had kids to worry about and the vehicles never really mattered! When she was in high school you could buy 60's Impalla's used with 327's and 427's and True SS models for as low as $15! Wish those days were still here!
The 427 Windsor as I was talking about was in the Saleen S7 (2000-2004) but it was bored and stroked 351 Windsor with 550 BHP at 6400 rpm! But that car was capable of 220 mph! In 2005 the Saleen S7 was upped with twin turbos and would top 248 mph and had the same engine with 750 BHP at 6300 rpm!
In all reality I know ford only sold the 428 and 429 Cobra Jet big blocks and also had a Boss 429 Hemi, but Mickey Thompson did develop and manufacture a few modified 427 Hemi's but they would have been based upon ford big blocks that were available obviously the from the MEL "Lima Plant" or FE engine family!
But while researching I found this from the FE family! The Ford single overhead cam (SOHC) 427 V8 engine, familiarly known as the "Cammer", was released in 1964 in an effort to maintain NASCAR dominance by seeking to counter the extremely powerful, enormously large block Chrysler 426 Hemi "elephant" engine.
I obviously never mentioned "Factory Made 427 Windsor" (I Should have mentioned the Saleen S7), just was reading literature about it's power and the engine they had in it! But you should have guessed that, just as this video talks about, that it was a modified engine I was referring to!
So thanks for reminding me to correct and clearly refer to where the information on the 427 Windsor was from!
870hp on 98 octane ! who would hit the thumbs down on that ?
People will always complain it's a giving when your posting videos. The funny thing is that people whom complain the most have never built an engine in their life. Maybe assembled an engine but not built it. A monkey can assemble an engine, but it takes a true Engine builder(Technician )to build an awesome machine.
GREAT BUILD,AMAZING HORSE POWER, THANKS FOR A GREAT VIDEO
3:28 What went wrong there? did he cross thread it? or is the gasket causing a problem?
Those cylinder heads are bloody nice !
Absolutely fantastic! go get em guys! fabulous!!!!! 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
Yeah when i saw the belt drive i was stunned!!! Chain drive is the only way to go. But besides that she is a BEAST!!!!!
This looks so much fun to do
That's maybe the first dyno session I've watched where more power was made without the carb spacer. That means they got it right when they designed that intake, lol. Sweet engine. Replace that carb with a throttle body, drill some injector ports, and it will be perfect for my '70 ford mustang restomod dream car.
8:30
Что делала свеча зажигания в карбюраторе?
Торчала , йопт!!😎
Im not that much of a Ford fan but this video is really good.
Absolutely Incredible, hell of a build and im gona be considering that recipe in the future for sure. Great video and great job, keep the builds n recipes coming please!!
800+ horsepower out of a naturally aspirated engine with 93 octane. Impressive and I like Chevy.
how good is this guy! man franks great... i wish i could meet him up in close
Did a great job enjoyed watching it everything Billet aluminum awesome!
Sweetness. And thank you for killing the music when you got to the dyno room. Nothing worse than masking the sound of a purring engine.
Still find myself coming back to this video
This is a thing of beauty!
Incredible engine. Beautiful job!
Heck of an engine there! Only thing I noticed though was on the dyno pulls, when the throttle got cracked open all the way it almost seemed like it was holding back for a few seconds, maybe a carb/timing tweak? Seemed like the motor couldn't overcome the dyno until it got some rev's up. Regardless though, a really nice build!
Amazing power for pump 98 and that much compression
Put a feeler gauge between the connecting rods to take up the thrust clearance before you torque down your caps. If you'll take down one you just built the way you are, you'll see some of the bearings with a tiny bend where the twist let you mash the insert. That small place bleeds off some oil pressure and can make the difference when you're pushing the RPM limits.
Seems to be missing a gasket on the china wall under the intake? @5:43
Watching this is so satisfying :D