**You WON'T BELIEVE What Happened When This Hardcore Atheist Debated Christians! (Mindblowing!)**

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
  • Debunking Christianity was no problem for this confident atheist... until one debate changed EVERYTHING. What shocking revelation made him question his entire worldview? This is a powerful testimony you NEED to see! Anil Kanda talks with Sebastian Braxton.
    Super thanks and subscribing:
    *If you enjoyed this video and found it thought-provoking, consider giving it a SUPER THANKS! It helps us keep creating amazing content for you.
    *Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE for more mind-blowing stories and hit that notification bell so you never miss an upload!
    #atheist #christianity #debate #faith #god #converted #testimony #mindblown #shocking #lifelessons #subscribe #superthanks

Комментарии • 23

  • @seventhangel8747
    @seventhangel8747 Месяц назад +1

    I experienced the same thing.
    God baptised me with fire in my bedroom.
    Electricity was running up and down in my body.
    I didn't know what was happening.
    My friend said it was the Holy Spirit.
    I only said to God I know that you can hear me and I want to hear from you. I thought he was going to talk to me. I was still in my bed trying to hear from him.
    I never read the bible ever because I wasn't a Christian then.
    When I read the bible it says John will baptise with you water but Jesus will baptise with you with fire.🔥
    He is a living God who can hear you.
    Praise and Glory be to our Living Most High God forever 🙏

  • @Terabapu3156
    @Terabapu3156 Месяц назад

    Thanks for sharing,God bless🙏🙏

  • @seventhangel8747
    @seventhangel8747 Месяц назад

    Jesus said I will build my church and the gates of hell shall NOT prevail against it 🙏

  • @christylynnhogan
    @christylynnhogan 28 дней назад

    I was about to like this testimony until nearly halfway through when he identified himself as a heretic who doesn’t believe what God’s word says, about a topic Jesus spoke of more than most others at that. This guy needs to repent! And Anil as an interviewer needs to be a better keeper.

  • @TheoSkeptomai
    @TheoSkeptomai Месяц назад

    Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented. My position is that *_I currently have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._*
    And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 11 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that a particular god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument which _concludes_ there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating the verity of such a claim. If any of the following facts were to be contravened at a later time by evidence, experience, or sound argument, I would THEN have good reason to acknowledge such a reality.
    1. I have never been presented with a functional definition of a god.
    2. I personally have never observed a god.
    3. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god.
    4. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity.
    5. I have never been presented with any _valid_ logical argument, which also introduced demonstrably true premises that lead deductively to an inevitable conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality.
    6. Of the many logical syllogisms I have examined arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain a formal or informal logical fallacy or a premise that can not be demonstrated to be true.
    7. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon.
    8. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._
    9. I have never knowingly experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event.
    10. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed appears to have *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity.
    11. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have been presented have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as _falsifiable._
    ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any particular god.
    I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._*
    I welcome any cordial response. Peace.

    • @statutesofthelord
      @statutesofthelord Месяц назад

      Hello Theo, Atheists believe in the "No God".
      Jesus Christ spoke this world, sun, moon, and stars into existence. That means that he is the rightful owner of all this. We are Jesus' rightful possession.
      So shouldn't we do what our Creator has told us to do?

    • @AbiV31
      @AbiV31 Месяц назад +1

      Observable evidence was found in the 12 disciples who were literally crucified and slayed in horrendous ways. They testified of the God claimed by the Israelites from thousands of years ago to be true, that the Word of God was made Flesh. That they handled Him, and spent time with the Messiah. The Chosen One, the Second Adam, Son of God Son of Man.
      I first hand witnessed God defend His presence.
      When I was 5 we were hanging out on my front porch in PR. My 2 older brothers in me, at night one day were hanging out with another kid who was roughly 11-14yrs old boy, he said: "God ain't real. I'll take crap on His head if He is real. As a matter of fact if God's real let Him strike with lightning as I walk out your gate.
      Then, he proceeded to open the gate with his left hand, and guided his bicycle out the gate. He took 2 steps before A lightning ⚡ bolt struck about 2ft in front of him.
      The boy, needless to say was terrified, and I ran inside and hid and cried 😂😅. Because in that split second, when the lightning bolt hit the ground, you could see the figure of an angel standing, before it flashed to all white.
      And I knew then what the Bible has confirmed through consistent vigorable amount of research and diving into different Bible books, that Lord I read have revealed Himself to me, in very mighty ways that I can't ever deny.

    • @mrshankerbillletmein491
      @mrshankerbillletmein491 Месяц назад +1

      As many have observed there is the appearance of design in life and the universe I have never heard a good naturalistic explanation for this appearance of design. Atheists demand explanation demonstration while explaining nothing and demonstrating nothing. Can you prove Jesus is not LORD or is that just what you believe?

    • @TheoSkeptomai
      @TheoSkeptomai Месяц назад

      @statutesofthelord Are you asking if I, an atheist, believe there to be no gods? If so, the answer is YES. If that is not your question, simply rephrase it, and I will answer it.

    • @TheoSkeptomai
      @TheoSkeptomai Месяц назад

      @mrshankerbillletmein491 Why would the mere _appearance_ of design need an explanation? I am not following.