"PhD Biologist Rejects Evolutionary Doctrine"-They are teaching this stuff to our kids? Please watch

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 авг 2024
  • Welcome to an eye-opening journey where we uncover the controversial stance of a renowned PhD biologist who boldly rejects Darwinian evolution.
    Discover the compelling arguments and groundbreaking evidence that challenge the conventional teachings we've all heard in school. This video is a must-watch for anyone curious about the origins of life and the ongoing debate in the scientific community.
    Dr Standish has a Bachelor's in Biology, a Masters in Zoology, a PHD in Environmental Biology and Public Policy. He is a professor in biology and has lectured all around the world.
    🌟 Subscribe for more thought-provoking videos! Don't forget to hit the bell icon to stay updated on our latest content.
    👍 Share this video with as many people as possible to spark meaningful discussions!
    💬 Comment below with your thoughts and opinions - we love hearing from you! Please keep comments respectful! Thank you.
    🙏 Support us with a Super Thanks donation to help us continue bringing you high-quality, informative content.
    Together, let's explore the depths of science and challenge the status quo!
    #ScienceDebate #EvolutionVsCreation #DarwinControversy #PhDBiologist #EvolutionMyths #ScientificDiscussion #ChallengingDarwin #ScienceTruth #BiologyDebate #EvolutionDebunked #Biblically #Sounddoctrine
    #FrankTurek #Biblical #prophecy #christian #genesis #Bible
    #ScienceRevolution #BiologyFacts #OriginsOfLife #ScientificEvidence
    #BreakingScience #God #Scripture #truth #Searchingforanswers #Racism #Hitler #CriticalThinking #SubscribeForMore
    Background music by: I Am a Man Who Will Fight for Your Honor by Chris Zabriskie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommon...

Комментарии • 110

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon Месяц назад +4

    In physics matter and energy cannot make or direct themselves. So there was a time when matter and energy were made as well as time itself since measurable time can’t exist without a great amount of matter. This means there was a time when time was made in the not too distant past. This shows that every physical thing is the result of a Creation.
    Only your Creator can perfectly cover for you Himself and remake you again from the inside out by the power of His true word as no one else ever can. This is the only absolute truth in existence.

    • @captaingaza2389
      @captaingaza2389 Месяц назад

      Stop asserting nonsense and DEMONSTRATE a creator exists
      Xtians love to assert nonsense without ever DEMONSTRATING said assertion
      Y’all pathetic

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon Месяц назад +3

    If you want to define extra copies as junk, that’s up to you. It is still avoiding the overall structure of the genome that determines what’s what. Hand waving away genetic entropy doesn’t mean that it goes away.
    Impress me with something substantial like how you get billions and billions of viable functional bits of written programming that’s not there by making mistakes to the viable functional written programming that is there. …in a limited amount of time or any amount of time.

    • @davidvalenzky7010
      @davidvalenzky7010 Месяц назад

      When was the last time you took your head out of your ASS

  • @luisdasilva3879
    @luisdasilva3879 Месяц назад +5

    Adaptation is not evolution , I believe and it makes sense that God created us with adaptation skills , This confused Darwin in his research on the Galapagos Islands regarding birds' beaks .

    • @thetabletopskirmisher
      @thetabletopskirmisher Месяц назад +2

      You can evolve/adapt. I prefer the term micro-evolution: small adaptations. Darwinian macro-evolution is just nonsense.

    • @captaingaza2389
      @captaingaza2389 Месяц назад

      @@thetabletopskirmisher
      The fossil record says you’re wrong
      Try another LIE 😂

  • @MachinedInWood
    @MachinedInWood Месяц назад +1

    If the remake Willy Wonka with an “anything but white” guy, this is the guy…

  • @PureCarbon
    @PureCarbon Месяц назад +1

    Roses are red, my shirt is yellow, this guy has a PHD that Andrews University doesn't offer.

    • @poliincredible770
      @poliincredible770 Месяц назад +1

      Notice how nobody who believes he evolved from an ape-like creature ever shows who in his lineage was an ape-like creature?

    • @sentienttree6286
      @sentienttree6286 20 дней назад

      ​@@poliincredible770 I don't know any human who is not an ape-like creature. Give me a feature that you think is unique to humans?

    • @poliincredible770
      @poliincredible770 20 дней назад

      @@sentienttree6286 apes have a hole at the back of their skull where the spine attaches, humans have a hole at the base because we walk upright and they walk on all fours.

    • @sentienttree6286
      @sentienttree6286 20 дней назад

      @poliincredible770 are Ardipithecus and Austrolipithecus apes? Because they also have anterior foramen magnums and walked upright (can't remember the specific species off the top of my head)

  • @georg7120
    @georg7120 Месяц назад +1

    Does he have an alternative theory?

    • @imwelshjesus
      @imwelshjesus Месяц назад

      Yes, its the baby jesus wot dun it all cos it says so in a bumper book of ancient fables, myths and scams. Ah! men.

    • @spamm0145
      @spamm0145 Месяц назад +1

      @@imwelshjesus Evolutionists have been guilty of fabricated and fraudulent evidence for the impossible theory of evolution, this is because a lie has to be supported by those very things. The bible is Gods word and has no need to lie. For example, the bible clearly states all living things were created, there is complex purposefully arranged information in all living organisms, what do we observe about information? The source is always a mind. Evolution requires you to ignore this absolute fact in favour of information just pops into existence without the need for a mind. A.I. can produce new information from existing data sets but what is the original source of the A.I.? A mind. You can pretend that complexity and information does not necessitate the source being a mind but that is not reality. Even the so called 'simple' cell is greater in complexity than any technology mankind has devised, yet according to evolution the information within this biological miracle did not require a mind. This is why the bible labels people 'fools and scoffers'

    • @thomasmyers9128
      @thomasmyers9128 Месяц назад +2

      We are created….
      Do you believe that
      Something came from nothing
      Life came from non life
      Reason came from non reason
      Order comes from non order
      It’s goes on and on

    • @truthbebold4009
      @truthbebold4009 Месяц назад

      My theory is that it was not mindless, meaningless, purposeless forces that are responsible for our existence.

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 Месяц назад

      @@thomasmyers9128 The problem there is the origin of a creator.

  • @teroomakirai5170
    @teroomakirai5170 Месяц назад +2

    A++++😮😅❤

  • @forrest7050
    @forrest7050 Месяц назад +1

    He keeps talking about a god. God does this, god does that etc. As a scientist should he not define first of all what a god is and show the evidence for the existence of this god? And then explain, with evidence, HOW he did these things. If he presents this as a paper for peer scrutiny, THEN he might have a foundation for offering an alternative hypothesis for evolution. Until he does this this whole video is just meaningless, it is merely his opinion.

    • @anilkanda611
      @anilkanda611  Месяц назад +2

      Your comment is meaningless. Science is about discovery and looking at all viable options. Second, this isn’t a phd paper -it’s a TV show. It’s made to share perspectives.

    • @forrest7050
      @forrest7050 Месяц назад

      @@anilkanda611 All that is exactly what I was implying. Science is indeed all about discovery. No scientist is adverse to having theories challenged. Falsifiability of a theory is one of the key attributes of a scientific theory. And a necessary component of the scientific method. So if he wants his opinion to be taken seriously he needs to present it as an alternative hypothesis to the current theory of evolution, (not, by the way, the hypothesis presented 160 years ago.)
      Until he does that his understanding of evolution has no validity and is only worthy of being presented on a chat show. It is meaningless to equate what he says to science. it just equates to his opinion.

    • @JoyPeace-ej2uv
      @JoyPeace-ej2uv Месяц назад

      @@forrest7050 It is equally important to equate Darwinism as was said in the video to a religion and not science. Darwin had some examples not real science and a friend pushed him to publish over his own conscience. He realized it could be misunderstood and used for what some people eventually did. Apply it to people groups and try to say some humans are more "evolved" than others thus superior. Racism. It does not belong in science text books without a LOT more evidence that has not been produced. I have studied it all the way up to the Master's level. Evidence lacking and a lot of arguments in class.

    • @Spluush
      @Spluush Месяц назад

      @@anilkanda611 Actually his comment is valid, you can't disprove something with something that you have no evidence of and can not even define in reality, it's nonsense.
      You're a grifter.

    • @griffinsi7818
      @griffinsi7818 Месяц назад +1

      Men became scientific because they excepted order in nature and they expected it because they believed in a a creator.
      The idea that a scientist cannot mention God is a later development within science as attempt to disprove God.
      Your comment actually highlights how successful the devil has been in warping things like he typically tries to

  • @kris78787
    @kris78787 Месяц назад

    They also lied to us about earth being a round ball. The earth is flat.

    • @JohnA-bear
      @JohnA-bear 29 дней назад

      ​@SaintFluffySnowWater will always find its level. Water levels are accurate tools for leveling foundations. Spirit levels with the air bubbles are very reliable. On a flat earth water finding its level is an easy concept to understand. If the earth is a globe, the oceans curving around a ball shaped earth. That flies in the face of water finding its level plus the water levels wouldn't be an accurate way to set foundations. We should be able to find and measure curves in lakes and oceans.

  • @davidvalenzky7010
    @davidvalenzky7010 Месяц назад

    Endless Bullshit

    • @spamm0145
      @spamm0145 Месяц назад +3

      You have perfectly described the absurdity of 'molecules to man'

    • @truthbebold4009
      @truthbebold4009 Месяц назад

      💥+⌛=🦋🐇🌼

    • @captaingaza2389
      @captaingaza2389 Месяц назад

      Are men not made of molecules?
      Oops
      😂😂😂