"But of course this doesn't work because..." *shows a extremely complicated 8 move counter* Never change dude, you are precious, really enjoy your content
Its funny you say that. Last year I encountered a lot of cheaters on both chess.com and lichess.org. I think chess.com is far worse as they are probably reluctant to ban players to earn those fees. I closed my chess.com account as a result of my frustration with cheaters there. Anyway, I noticed this year I have seen very few cheaters on lichess.org. I can't be sure its due to the actual number of cheaters going down or a result of my rating going up 300+ points on various time controls. Its nice to play online against players whose rating matches their skill level.
i stopped to play for the same reason. and even if i report the player who cheats, his account is not closed, coz anyone can play 100% best move game with every move in less than 10 seconds.
Supernova I think it's cause they are getting banned since recently I got a message from lichess that I lost to 3 separate cheaters and they had their accounts banned
Sure crazy to see how much is changed huh man? I bet you never imagined your channel growing to this height. I’m proud of you man. Been here since 2000 subs. Still my favorite chess channel by far. And I’m sure many will agree with me. Hope you get to a million.
Been watching daily since about 3k subs early summer last year. I stopped watching matojelic's videos and the other videos I watch are from the chessnetwork, st. louis club, or Atlanta club. But I rarely go to them anymore unless I'm looking for a specific lecture.
I usually don't watch re-runs but considering how my vast chess knowledge has increased this remastered, collectors edition is worthy of my time. Thanks!
We truly appreciate your increased knowledge. One #suggestion is if you could review a few games by players in the 1000 - 1500 range to go over the common mistakes. Thanks Mator
I re-watched the original game three coverage yesterday. And after seeing this update, it's clear your vast knowledge has expanded to heroic proportions. Thank you so much for sharing it.
One thing has just occurred to me... If I were to play a match against Fischer, it would put me into the same rarified category of grandmasters that Taimanov and Larsen belong to... 😜
Perhaps there could be a 'Fischer Number', akin to the Erdős Number, or Degrees of Kevin Bacon... how many connections does it take to get from you to Fischer? For instance, Ben Finegold's Fischer Number is 2, since you go from him to his dad (Ron Finegold), then from his dad to Fischer... his dad played Fischer, and he obviously has played his dad. Whether this would be in tournament play, or just ad-hoc, would be another criteria... 'what is your tournament Fischer number?'.
Mine is 2. I played the late great GM Anatoly Lein in the US Open (Round 10!) in 1978. He played Spassky (as well as a few others who played Fischer) a few times in the USSR Championships.
I read a chess book back in the 1980s describing this line but it didn't demonstrate how it should be followed up as Antonio did here. I have only now thirty five years later began to deploy it in my repertoire against the KID.
I really appreciate getting a postscript on this game. The first video raised a lot of questions, and as a critical point in one of chess's most legendary stories, it deserved this extra positional analysis. Perfect.
About 4k or 8k, it depends on the users monitor, if the user has a 1080p monitor, then there is no difference between 4k and 1080p, but if they have a 4k or a higher resolution display, then the difference is noticeable
RioT_CS he’s talking about the human eye, i also heard once the average eye tops out 3300ish not even being able to register 4k. idk tho this only the second time/person ive heard say that
It depends on the screen size/pixel density, 4k is 4x denser in pixels than 1080p (if the screen size stays the same, of course), and that is quite noticeable
Can you stop picking on someone who does not speak English as a native language and who is providing great content at no charge? Just sit back and "enjoy the show" and be grateful.
Mitch Friedfeld Lol, relax man. English isn't my first language either, I also have the habit of saying two words constantly together because I got used to it. And btw I got a like from agadmator so I guess he gets that I'm only joking.
If he ever says "knowledge" without "vast" i wont like the video. I allready miss his grip for the sound... Oh, a "vast" pawn would be something too. ;)
Mustafa Ba Haj. You can please some of the people some of the time but you can never please all the people all the time. Critics often back peddle and claim they are joking after posting a stupid comment.
Thank you very much, agadmator, for remaking this video, I enjoyed it very much! Taimanov made a really unfortunate decision and Fischer was more than a bit lucky this time.
Any news about you attempting to have an interview with Nezhmetdinov's son? I remember something like that you said in the past, around last month if I'm not mistaken.
It is a myth that the human eye cannot perceive 4k agadmator. Our eyes don't perceive in resolution and having a higher pixel density is useful for larger screens as well as screens closer to the face. There's diminishing returns with distance and size, but there's definitely a benefit to quality with having 4k!
The resolution depends on the size of the screen and the amount of pixels. Obviously on a big screen with many pixels you will see the difference bedween 1080p and 4k
Hey agadmator, i'm a 21 year old guy from portugal who follows all your videos. I started 1 year ago and I love chess ever since. Anyway, I recently started to watch a serie called "The Blacklist". I don't know if you know it, but it is about a criminal mastermind who turns himself in to the FBI and he has a list of the most dangerous people on earth. Together with the FBI they try to catch them all. On season 2, episode 11, the main character makes reference to a game that occured in 1972, bobby fischer against spassky when bobby sacrifices a bishop. I would like you to check that out because I'm not really sure if you already covered that game and I would love to see you doing it. Thanks for the amazing channel. Keep the good work.
The review of this game in Chess Life and Review, which I read when I was 27, quoted Fischer as saying, "If Taimanov had played Q-h3 I would have resigned."
@10:00 Go Player here. I have had rare cases where after thinking for a long time I came to the conclusion that my candidate move just doesn't work. Typically, i then chose another move very quickly which can be almost as bad as using the flawed one. It seems to psychologically difficult to go back to thre drawing board and spend even more time to properly evaluate other moves after wasting so much time.
A recommendation: perhaps highlight the board (or pieces) whenever you play your hypothetical moves? Sometimes I lose track whenever you begin/pause the actual game play
Chess history should be broken down into two basic eras: Pre-com and Post-com (Pre-computer and Post-computer). That would settle the G.O.A.T. argument with Fischer being the greatest Pre-com chess player and Kasparov or Carlsen being the greatest Post-com chess player. If one wanted to expand the era concept, Morphy would be the G.O.A.T. of the Romantic Era; Capablanca would be the G.O.A.T. of the the Positional Era; and Alekine would be the G.O.A.T. of the Ruskie Era.
Lol- How long one needs to study a position to see the path depends greatly on the caliber of the player, yes? I played against Tarjan in a simultaneous and got him to accept a draw. Before he accepted, he said, "You have the better game". I could feel that it was but I COULD NOT see it. A month later I woke from sleep with the solution.
it's funny what you said about the deep think and not finding better moves than the one you thought of pretty quickly. now i am not a good player but i thought king move to h8 quick and my thought was it makes it so the knight isnt pinned and the queen isnt in as good an attack spot, but then i started looking around at a few other moves trying to figure out if they could be countered harshly.
We have to remember that Fischer was also a regular in psychological warfare. Fischer knew that Q-H3 was a losing move for him but he must've played K-H8 so stoically that Taimanov could not think for himself in that moment. I bet you Fischer for the entire 72min had the same smug face that never gave Taimanov any hope so he figured that it must be true there was no other better option than the move he made. Fischer went to war. He didn't just play a game. It was no holds barred for Fischer every match.
I have a 1440p ultrawide monitor and the difference between 1080p is striking. We have a few 4K monitors at work and you can definitely see the difference. So not sure what you meant that you can't see 4K. You most definitely can.
Hey, Antonio are you following the Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz: Rapid Rounds? There are some very interesting games happening. In the round 7 Caruana blundered a winning position against GM Dominguez I believe. The official commentary of the GCT is fine, however, I'd love to see your take on some of the positions ;)
Who told you that the human eye can't see 4K? That makes as much sense as asking how long is a string.... What matters is pixels per degree of viewing angle. Pixel size and viewing distance are the determining factors. Number of pixels on a display means nothing by itself....
The theory keeps popping up in surprising places.... Maybe it's a conspiracy theory made by the media (and promoted by Agadmator?!) to make us think we don't want 4K?
In the 1973 USSR chess championship - "The strongest of all" - Taimanov played the same line against Spassky, but Spassky improved Fischer´s play and crushed Taimanov brilliantly.
my man,had taimanov,found qh3,this could have been a treat to watch,fischer of course had the ability to put off such an attack,but this attack would have been so strong and i even doubt fischer or any modern player could have defended this.
Hey dude, on 7:29, what if white replies with Be7 attacking the Queen? Since Be7 QxRc7, and after QxNd5+, i think any move black makes, white is still better. Or am I missing something here?
Fischer had all of these small improvements worked out much before. That's why he is always confident. He would loose a game or two due to his cockiness but otherwise he was invincible.
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Sneaking [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ILUps2zDFU/mqdefault.jpg)
"But of course this doesn't work because..."
*shows a extremely complicated 8 move counter*
Never change dude, you are precious, really enjoy your content
lol i thought the same
an*
What a kiss ass
@@mikevaldez7684 fuck you, Antonio deserves all the praise and accolades he receives.
This is the crispest, best quality 180p video I've ever seen. Not to mention the how vastly my knowledge has been boosted by viewing it.
180p???
listen to what he says at the begining of the video :D not 1080p but 180p. that's why MrVvulf was joking
I like to watch Agadmator's video in 144p as it consumes far less bandwidth. Only issue is you can't read the quotes.
I have a 4k tv, and I can definitely see the difference with my human eye, compared to 1080p (hd / 2k)
@@djudju8047 oh lord 144p Dont be so cheap atleast try it on 240p.
The pain when you play beautiful attacking chess and other online player is using engine to defend properly can be felt in this game.
Its funny you say that. Last year I encountered a lot of cheaters on both chess.com and lichess.org. I think chess.com is far worse as they are probably reluctant to ban players to earn those fees. I closed my chess.com account as a result of my frustration with cheaters there.
Anyway, I noticed this year I have seen very few cheaters on lichess.org. I can't be sure its due to the actual number of cheaters going down or a result of my rating going up 300+ points on various time controls. Its nice to play online against players whose rating matches their skill level.
i stopped to play for the same reason. and even if i report the player who cheats, his account is not closed, coz anyone can play 100% best move game with every move in less than 10 seconds.
Not anyone who is better than you is a cheater. Maybe you are just trash at this game lmfao.
12InchesUnBuffed i agree to u some players are accusing me a cheater just because i play excellently btw my rating is around 2k+ in any chess online.
Supernova I think it's cause they are getting banned since recently I got a message from lichess that I lost to 3 separate cheaters and they had their accounts banned
"does look a bit fishy" I see what you did there
Sure crazy to see how much is changed huh man? I bet you never imagined your channel growing to this height. I’m proud of you man. Been here since 2000 subs. Still my favorite chess channel by far. And I’m sure many will agree with me. Hope you get to a million.
By far the best chess channel on the internet
I absolutely agree, I think it's important to remind agad of this because he is putting in a lot of effort
Ganjalf The Green Yeah, you can tell he truly dedicates a part of his life to chess.
Fully agree
Been watching daily since about 3k subs early summer last year. I stopped watching matojelic's videos and the other videos I watch are from the chessnetwork, st. louis club, or Atlanta club. But I rarely go to them anymore unless I'm looking for a specific lecture.
I usually don't watch re-runs but considering how my vast chess knowledge has increased this remastered, collectors edition is worthy of my time. Thanks!
Fischer is a freaking genius..... It's completely shows in all of his games
We truly appreciate your increased knowledge. One #suggestion is if you could review a few games by players in the 1000 - 1500 range to go over the common mistakes. Thanks Mator
*Bobby Fisher was doing engine moves in 1971, that's why he's the best chess player ever*
Capablanca was doing engine moves as well.
I re-watched the original game three coverage yesterday. And after seeing this update, it's clear your vast knowledge has expanded to heroic proportions. Thank you so much for sharing it.
I really love that first video. Those earlier Agadmator Fischer videos were what first really got me in to chess.
I love how frequently u post
One thing has just occurred to me... If I were to play a match against Fischer, it would put me into the same rarified category of grandmasters that Taimanov and Larsen belong to... 😜
Marian Palko I don't think that resign on move 42 and checkmate on move 15 is the same ;)
A victim is a victim :)
Perhaps there could be a 'Fischer Number', akin to the Erdős Number, or Degrees of Kevin Bacon... how many connections does it take to get from you to Fischer? For instance, Ben Finegold's Fischer Number is 2, since you go from him to his dad (Ron Finegold), then from his dad to Fischer... his dad played Fischer, and he obviously has played his dad. Whether this would be in tournament play, or just ad-hoc, would be another criteria... 'what is your tournament Fischer number?'.
Mine is 2. I played the late great GM Anatoly Lein in the US Open (Round 10!) in 1978. He played Spassky (as well as a few others who played Fischer) a few times in the USSR Championships.
That would make your Fischer number 3... you to Lein, Lein to Spassky, Spassky to Fischer.
This is definitely one of the better games ever played. Amazing how they can calculate these lines.
I read a chess book back in the 1980s describing this line but it didn't demonstrate how it should be followed up as Antonio did here. I have only now thirty five years later began to deploy it in my repertoire against the KID.
I really appreciate getting a postscript on this game. The first video raised a lot of questions, and as a critical point in one of chess's most legendary stories, it deserved this extra positional analysis. Perfect.
About 4k or 8k, it depends on the users monitor, if the user has a 1080p monitor, then there is no difference between 4k and 1080p, but if they have a 4k or a higher resolution display, then the difference is noticeable
RioT_CS he’s talking about the human eye, i also heard once the average eye tops out 3300ish not even being able to register 4k. idk tho this only the second time/person ive heard say that
It depends on the screen size/pixel density, 4k is 4x denser in pixels than 1080p (if the screen size stays the same, of course), and that is quite noticeable
It also depends on the source material authoring and whether it is a still or video.
Jay Weed then did you watch the video twice :P
@@Jay_Weed420 but average eye can see difference between FHD and UHD. As you said average eye can see around 3k and FHD is just below 2k
After that king h8 move Taimanov was like: "Fischer why you gotta be so rude don't you know i'm human too" LMAO...
King Zero i'm gonna marry you anyway...?
KappaPride
Your comment is MAGICal
3:33 "(...) everything else will now be the same as in game 1, but very different as you will see".
Mom: If everyone thought it was cool would you still do it?
Me: yes...especially when agadmator thinks its cool
Actually, it was the first game of yours I watched a year ago and subscribed your channel!!
7:35
"This rook on c7 does look a bit FISHY here"
And it's a game against Fischer!
I get it now.
Taimanov was all at sea after that move!
Can you ever say "knowledge" without "vast"? 😁😁
Can you stop picking on someone who does not speak English as a native language and who is providing great content at no charge? Just sit back and "enjoy the show" and be grateful.
Mitch Friedfeld Lol, relax man. English isn't my first language either, I also have the habit of saying two words constantly together because I got used to it. And btw I got a like from agadmator so I guess he gets that I'm only joking.
If he ever says "knowledge" without "vast" i wont like the video. I allready miss his grip for the sound... Oh, a "vast" pawn would be something too. ;)
Mustafa Ba Haj. You can please some of the people some of the time but you can never please all the people all the time. Critics often back peddle and claim they are joking after posting a stupid comment.
Nevertheless, it would be not as steadfast for when Agadmator says it without "vast"
The scenarios you explain in detail is awesome. Helpful how you paint the picture in my head as you explain what if he makes this move, or doesnt .
Love you agadmator! The human eye can perceive the difference between 1080 and 4K, but not on a small screen and not far away.
I really value you. You’ve given a sense of narrative and historical continuity in my chess life that is very valuable
Thank you very much, agadmator, for remaking this video, I enjoyed it very much! Taimanov made a really unfortunate decision and Fischer was more than a bit lucky this time.
Thanks for rekindling my love of chess. Great video as always
Yehh..get to million soon....doing well man.
great journey so far
What a crazy game, white on the attack the entire time and Fischer still comes out with basically a win. Incredible
Mikhail is Tal and Nigel Short
Actually Tal was quite short and Nigel is quite tall.
@@davidcopson5800 that is true, how ironic is that looool
Taimanov truly cracked when playing against Fischer.
By far, your best video so far...
Beautiful game and second analysis of this wonderful game.
Any news about you attempting to have an interview with Nezhmetdinov's son? I remember something like that you said in the past, around last month if I'm not mistaken.
you deserve more than 2 Million views bro the amount of work an dedication you put into your video is deserving of that congrats
It is a myth that the human eye cannot perceive 4k agadmator. Our eyes don't perceive in resolution and having a higher pixel density is useful for larger screens as well as screens closer to the face. There's diminishing returns with distance and size, but there's definitely a benefit to quality with having 4k!
Best non-stealing-my-money 180p video on this match I've ever seen!
Nice video as always, loving the Fischer series
Great work, Antonio. Regards from Argentina
oh nice, obviously im a cool guy
The resolution depends on the size of the screen and the amount of pixels. Obviously on a big screen with many pixels you will see the difference bedween 1080p and 4k
Hey agadmator, i'm a 21 year old guy from portugal who follows all your videos. I started 1 year ago and I love chess ever since. Anyway, I recently started to watch a serie called "The Blacklist". I don't know if you know it, but it is about a criminal mastermind who turns himself in to the FBI and he has a list of the most dangerous people on earth. Together with the FBI they try to catch them all. On season 2, episode 11, the main character makes reference to a game that occured in 1972, bobby fischer against spassky when bobby sacrifices a bishop. I would like you to check that out because I'm not really sure if you already covered that game and I would love to see you doing it. Thanks for the amazing channel. Keep the good work.
I mentioned it once, but will cover it soon.
Agadmator: 4k steals your money.
-constantly increasing our vast knowledge.
I wish I could go back in time and give Taimanov a hug.
I love the in depth analysis!
This video was so great I whish I could like it twice! Many thanks agad
9:18 -- for those of you who were able to do it, you are an excellent defender... or and excellent subscriber, who remembers it from my previous video
You are excellent. Very entertaining content. Love the Croatian accent! :)
The review of this game in Chess Life and Review, which I read when I was 27, quoted Fischer as saying, "If Taimanov had played Q-h3 I would have resigned."
Well that would have been silly because it was still defendable.
Sounds like he was just rubbing it in
18:38 "A knight and rook are no match for the queen." Even less so are a knight and bishop.😂
@10:00 Go Player here. I have had rare cases where after thinking for a long time I came to the conclusion that my candidate move just doesn't work. Typically, i then chose another move very quickly which can be almost as bad as using the flawed one. It seems to psychologically difficult to go back to thre drawing board and spend even more time to properly evaluate other moves after wasting so much time.
A recommendation: perhaps highlight the board (or pieces) whenever you play your hypothetical moves? Sometimes I lose track whenever you begin/pause the actual game play
Great job! Really nice channel.
Nice haircut man. 😏
Thank you so much agad you are just the ches master
Chess history should be broken down into two basic eras: Pre-com and Post-com (Pre-computer and Post-computer). That would settle the G.O.A.T. argument with Fischer being the greatest Pre-com chess player and Kasparov or Carlsen being the greatest Post-com chess player. If one wanted to expand the era concept, Morphy would be the G.O.A.T. of the Romantic Era; Capablanca would be the G.O.A.T. of the the Positional Era; and Alekine would be the G.O.A.T. of the Ruskie Era.
Lol- How long one needs to study a position to see the path depends greatly on the caliber of the player, yes? I played against Tarjan in a simultaneous and got him to accept a draw. Before he accepted, he said, "You have the better game". I could feel that it was but I COULD NOT see it. A month later I woke from sleep with the solution.
Nice ( - :
@Peter sturm The king of the jungle.
it's funny what you said about the deep think and not finding better moves than the one you thought of pretty quickly. now i am not a good player but i thought king move to h8 quick and my thought was it makes it so the knight isnt pinned and the queen isnt in as good an attack spot, but then i started looking around at a few other moves trying to figure out if they could be countered harshly.
At 14:32 - 14:37,after the move 30 Qb3,instead of the presenter's suggested move - 30 ... b5,black has30 ... Rd331 Qa4 Ra332 Qb5 Qe3+33 Kf1 Rxa2
U have increased our already vast knowledge.
one of the best games i have ever saw, fischer had to dig deep and taimanov played the game of his life.
18:40 "so yeah, that's pretty much shit"
Reminds me of crazyrussianhacker 😂
The more games I see the more I am convinced that Fisher is one of three the most accurate players of all times...
Who are 1 and 2 according to you? I would have to say Paul Morphy was 1 and Capablanca was 2. Just my opinion.
Rumours are there that agadmator is matos son 😂😂....nice game btw....ur very punctual....😊...!!
In this game, Fisher looked like the Road Runner, and Taimanov like Wiley Coyote
At 15:50 why not Bd5 immediately? Why must you repeat the position with Qe3 and Qc1?
We have to remember that Fischer was also a regular in psychological warfare. Fischer knew that Q-H3 was a losing move for him but he must've played K-H8 so stoically that Taimanov could not think for himself in that moment. I bet you Fischer for the entire 72min had the same smug face that never gave Taimanov any hope so he figured that it must be true there was no other better option than the move he made. Fischer went to war. He didn't just play a game. It was no holds barred for Fischer every match.
This game is crazy.. hell complicated.
the soviets probably thought fischer had some new war technology installed in his brain when he played h8
I have a 1440p ultrawide monitor and the difference between 1080p is striking. We have a few 4K monitors at work and you can definitely see the difference. So not sure what you meant that you can't see 4K. You most definitely can.
I was astonished at the way taimanov was treated after this match. Was anybody else was treated this way
Hey, Antonio are you following the Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz: Rapid Rounds? There are some very interesting games happening. In the round 7 Caruana blundered a winning position against GM Dominguez I believe. The official commentary of the GCT is fine, however, I'd love to see your take on some of the positions ;)
I play ordinary chess and still get upset if I lose.I just cannot imagine how heartbroken Taimanov must have been,when he played against Fischer.
Who told you that the human eye can't see 4K? That makes as much sense as asking how long is a string.... What matters is pixels per degree of viewing angle. Pixel size and viewing distance are the determining factors. Number of pixels on a display means nothing by itself....
pretty sure he was trolling, and you took the bait. there's always one...
The theory keeps popping up in surprising places.... Maybe it's a conspiracy theory made by the media (and promoted by Agadmator?!) to make us think we don't want 4K?
You know you are having a bad day when you sit and think for 72 minutes and then come up with the worst move of the game.
In the 1973 USSR chess championship - "The strongest of all" - Taimanov played the same line against Spassky, but Spassky improved Fischer´s play and crushed Taimanov brilliantly.
looking forward to the video u will make about the caruana blunder!
I'm watching your videos daily
15:17 Damn I found Bc5+ :( am I still cool tho?
@Pablo Man - you have written the perfect definition of how to approach chess.
Interesting all the variations
16:01 You can just play Bd5 instantly, no need for checks.
Of course I found Bc5 and I was like "come on! it should be the bishop, not the queen", but yea it's way cooler haha
The human eye can only see between the ranges of 20Hz to 20kHz
Also i watch youtube in 144p because im poor
that is a quote of a man who feels guilty for crushing his opponent
I like the haircut. It looks very sharp and suits you.
Amazing game and amazing analysis. Would have been possible a sacrifice of rook h6, and then Qh3 on that crucial position?
Taimanov must have felt like jumping out the window when they showed him that queen move he missed. What a gut punch it must have been.
my man,had taimanov,found qh3,this could have been a treat to watch,fischer of course had the ability to put off such an attack,but this attack would have been so strong and i even doubt fischer or any modern player could have defended this.
I notice in this saga you have never point out yet (might have missed it) that is in this move that we have a completely new game.
11:43 why Bc4? You can just take the rook and play Nf7+ picking up the queen
Taimanov played beautiful moves.....yes....all beautiful things are destroyed mercilessly.....😎😎😎
How ironic that the move Taimanov missed is very close to the move Fischer saw in his Mozart's Symphony game, again against Spassky.
YES I AM A GREAT DEFENDER WITH ENGINE PRECISION THANK YOU FOR THE COMPLIMENT AGADMATOR
I thought about attempting to be extremely cool for a few seconds, and then decided I just wanted to enjoy the show, as usual.
Hey dude, on 7:29, what if white replies with Be7 attacking the Queen? Since Be7 QxRc7, and after QxNd5+, i think any move black makes, white is still better. Or am I missing something here?
After Bb7 even R×h6 is winning for white.After playing beautiful game taimanov missed many moves because he was intimidated by Fischer.
21:42 Qd7 or Qe7 and Black is fine here.
Qu'elle defense... superbe!
At 11:08 after Qf3 white could also go for Rf6 it could be a good move
Fischer had all of these small improvements worked out much before. That's why he is always confident. He would loose a game or two due to his cockiness but otherwise he was invincible.
Fischer even took 18 months off to plot his revenge and he came back damn near unbeatable. Fischer was the King of all chess grandmasters.
i like your sarcasm