Which Software Handles Fujifilm Raw Files Better, Lightroom or Capture One?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- In this video I compare Capture One against Lightroom to see which of the two perform best with Fujifilm raw files. We test both current medium format sensors the 50mp and the 100mp one. We also test the APSC sensor found in current X-T series cameras. Find out which of the two software is the best option for Fujifilm raw files. #fujifilm #gfx100
B&H Link
GFX 100 (100s) - bhpho.to/2TdLryb
GF 120mm Macro - bhpho.to/3yxcQv5
GFX 50S - bhpho.to/3B1pqEr
Fujifilm X-T4 -bhpho.to/3HzQehG
Amazon Links
GFX 100 - geni.us/gfx100lrg
GF 120mm Macro - geni.us/gf120mm
GFX 50S - geni.us/gfx50sII
Fujifilm X-T4 - geni.us/fujixt4sc
Link to Film Simulation Images - 1drv.ms/u/s!Aq...
Music in this video from - share.epidemics...
get 30 days free.
Gear used in this video
==================================
Make sure you calibrate your screens - bhpho.to/2D1Nrxv
For accurate colors - bhpho.to/2CAnHab
Still the Best Mirrorless Gimbal - bhpho.to/31ANk9z
Fujifilm X-T3 - bhpho.to/2MSwITG
Fuji 23mm f/2.0 - bhpho.to/30Z0xFO
Sony a7R III - bhpho.to/2Mobvli
Sony 28mm f/2.0 - bhpho.to/2AZHVxI
Sony 55mm f/1.8 - bhpho.to/2KXA7Bq
Best Gimbal Ever- bhpho.to/33ghQnv
Rode Lav Mics - bhpho.to/2INIlbt
My favourite tripod - bhpho.to/2MYRZhj
SD Cards - bhpho.to/3qvM3Kt
Keep in touch
==================================
Main Instagram - / sondercreative
![GFX 100 II: Should Hasselblad or Leica be Worried? [minute markers in video description below]](/img/1.gif)
B&H Link
GFX 100 (100s) - bhpho.to/2TdLryb
GF 120mm Macro - bhpho.to/3yxcQv5
GFX 50S - bhpho.to/3B1pqEr
Fujifilm X-T4 -bhpho.to/3HzQehG
Amazon Links
GFX 100 - geni.us/gfx100lrg
GF 120mm Macro - geni.us/gf120mm
GFX 50S - geni.us/gfx50sII
Fujifilm X-T4 - geni.us/fujixt4sc
The GFX has no Xtrans, so I would not suspect issues, the issue was caused by the xtrans, because the algorithms out there are better handled for bayer, and yes, Lightroom has improved there as well , but it is still slower, just compare a batch against Iridient X-Transformer
The one thing I do like Lightroom for better, is their perspective correction. Easier, faster and generally more accurate.
Interesting!
For me it's about the platform that I know and have a workflow in!
I could probably get more out of my raw files in capture one but I am already paying for the lightroom and Photoshop package and I am happy with the software!
Keep up the good work!
Thank you for the kind words, very appreciated. You're absolutely right, alot of is just down to what you're used to because the difference is minimal.
This is an interesting comparison, but you should be careful with the idea that raw processor creates more noise than another. Raw processors don't create noise. You're comparing two arbitrarily different default noise suppression settings. Any noise you see is in the raw file. You should be able to equal the noise reduction between these applications by moving settings around. Once you find an optimal setting for each, you can then compare the QUALITY of the noise reduction. But right now you're just comparing arbitrary defaults.
My switch to Capture One from LR was primarily based on higher ISO images, the quality of image at say iso 6400 was significantly better with Capture One. Fujifilm x-t2/x-t3 etc. At base iso all pretty much the same, albeit I do prefer the colour controls on Capture One.
When I first switched from Sony to Fuji in 2017, Capture One was the only game in town for Fuji raw files. Fast forward to today, it’s not surprising that Lightroom has caught up. What keeps me using Capture One is that it’s just a better photo editor.
I moved from Lightroom to Luminar Neo last year. Raw support for fuji seems to be good.
It took a couple of months for proper support to be added for the new 40mp sensors. For a little while I was having to convert the raws to dng. That's probably pretty standard for new sensor releases from all manufacturers though.
I highly recommended that you take a look at Fuji X Studio. you will see the colors from there looks way more accurate than LR & Capture One.
I will thank you for the suggestion.
@@Sondercreative also don't forget to connect the camera to computer. I will provide the link to download all the custom film simulations.
You can use luma curve for more precise shadow recovery in c1
The XT4 image looked like it had more pop in capture1(to me)
Link to Film Simulation Images - 1drv.ms/u/s!AqMU3QFCgyGIoctSxW0fx6rK7xnOpw?e=w9W6r1
But you miss one point. This cameras both are Bayer sensors... There was an issue and some say that still occurs when Lightroom process X-Trans sensor based .RAF
Yep you’re right, I covered x-trans in an article on fstoppers.
You are comparing the initial build-in editing for the two applications. That is a matter of taste. Any discrepancy can easily be adjusted to make them match. I think it's more interesting that Capture One is now turned into a kind of VIP app for people who are ready to pay twice the price for a subscription - compared to Adobe. Interesting how vanity can be exploited.
Adobe Lightroom costs 12 * 12 per year; C1 costs 350 once..
@@acidtears Yes, if you stay with the old C1 version.
Have you done the same test on Sony (arw) files?
Yep but only in article form. Might make a video about it later. Its currently on Fstoppers.